Personal Jurisdiction - SIMPLIFIED
Vložit
- čas přidán 5. 07. 2024
- Our Website ►personalbarprep.com/
Please share, comment, & subscribe!
In our series SIMPLIFIED, Jay Chavkin tackles topics on the California bar exam that often stump students & explains them in a quick, easy-to-understand video. Today: Personal Jurisdiction.
Jay Chavkin is the instructor and tutor at Personal Bar Prep, the company he founded in 1995 with the mission to provide California bar exam preparation that is truly personal and that has students directly engaging with the material. Personal Bar Prep offers a live, small group oriented course that focuses on practice and feedback. Jay also provides private tutoring.
For more information about the course or tutoring services, visit personalbarprep.com or call at 818-554-5664.
If you have suggestions for future topics on SIMPLIFIED, please leave a comment!
This is the best explanation of PJ I’ve ever heard. Succinct.
So helpful for my civil procedure class... you explained 9 minutes of what was 4 weeks of total confusion for me as a 1L! thank you!
You're welcome! Thank you for your comment.
May GOD bless and protect you! GOD is good! GOD is love in times of hate, GOD is strength in times of weakness, GOD is light in times of darkness, GOD is harmony in times of chaos, and GOD is all you need! If you need more love/strength/anything GOD is there! GOD loves you ND JESUS loves you! GOD BLESS!
You just summed up a 3 week course in 9 minutes! Amazing! Thank you.
So useful! Thank you.
This was the BEST law video explanation I have ever heard/seen. You have yourself a new subscriber and follower here! 🎉Thank you. I am not a law student but have learned it is single most important thing to teach your children these days. It’s dangerous when you and your kids know the law as a civilian. 😮it’s also a great side-hustle to exercise your rights lol. Sorry lawyers!!!!
This is extremely helpful! I couldn't find a non confusing explanation of this topic, but you simplified it so well!
Thank you! I'm glad you found it helpful.
This guy is good
I was getting a bit caught up on where we need to bring in the specific v general analysis, thanks for clearing that up!
This is truly excellent! I feel as though I understand this system of tests now, but I haven't found anything nearly as clear and concise on the matter as this video is! Bravo, and thank you!
Happy to hear that, thank you!
Thanks so much! in my 1L year and personal jurisdiction didn't make a lot of sense to me before I started asking it like a series of questions
Super helpful, criminally underviewed, and a godsend for a sad 1L
Both my son Cameron and I went to the Hospital in California. As a matter of fact, I was injured by a coffee burn at McDonald's (even before Stella Leibeck) when I was an employee of Blockbuster video. in California, but not justly compensated. I still have marks, and Cameron was diagnosed with Autism in California.
Great video
Great video!!
Thank You!
More more more! Please!
Thank you!
Thank you sir
Great Video!!!
Thank you!
What happened to our independent states per constitution ? If we are forced in by threat and duress of jails and guns, what happened to our constitutionally unalienable rights, all men die for ? Please respond. Please explain who created these birthing bonds, and why all of this isn't a form of trespass upon man and women ? Is this a penatly in lieu of the gold confiscation, after 192 hjr, instead of a promised payment back of any debt ? Why isn't this being done out here ? Don't we hire public servants to get this done ? Why isn't irs knowlegable of 26 without positive law ? I don't quote get it. What about k-nees caps to pray on ? And banking trades ? In Irs books who is source ? Who gives the seed money ?
Is this just for the California bar? Because the 2017 Supreme Court case BNSF drastically scaled back general jurisdiction for corporations. There is no "at home in the forum state" analysis now; it's really just incorporation or business headquarters.
A very useful video...simplified presentation..easy to understand
Sir please make a video on proportional representation of voting system.
I'm not sure I understand long arm statutes. Could you please explain this a different way for me
Can you explain Subject -Matter-Jurisdiction and must you have both in a case?
i had lived in California for 9years came to texas to visit for christmas and decided to stay with my parents ,enrolled my children in school in feb. in june my daughter made some serious acusassutions against me cps WAS INVOLED NOW they took my kids away ..does texas have juristriction
Could you do a video on Freedom of Speech/Protected Speech?
Question: So, In a civil procedure (A divorce Case) Example: I was divorced in one state, 2 years later moved to another state, I have no minimums with the prior state. I was ordered to pay Alimony, my husband served me in the state I'm in now for contempt. Can Jurisdiction be challenged now regarding the contempt?
you start out by saying, "if these exist..." . So, am I supposed to believe that the things that are relied on to obtain jurisdiction are just "gimmies"? It is just assumed that this applies? I know this is supposed to simplify the process, but the way you explained it, I cannot get past the fact that this jurisdiction you are talking about, solely relies on the fact that those things you say need to exist, exist at all. Even if I decide to assume that they exist, how can it be proved that any of these thing at all even apply to me, or anyone else for that matter? Maybe I am slow, but, how is it that any of this applies to anyone at all in the first place? I have never thought about this before, but every part of this is done by assumption, or is even magical or something, because most people that are served with a subpoena, or has a warrant, do not go to court by choice, or to indicate a minimum contact. People go to court , in most cases, because if they do not, people with badges and guns will come to your home, put you in hand cuffs, possibly impound your vehicle(which means you lose your car, job, and most likely your home shortly thereafter), and will lock you in a cell or cage, unless you are one of the lucky few that have enough money to pay for a bond for your release. I am disturbed by the premise of what I am hearing. It bothers me that we have the largest number of incarcerated people on this planet, and the authority to hear even a percentage of these cases were based on nothing more than an assumption that there is a right for the court to have control over these people in the first place. Anything past that part is irrelevant, because if those first things you just skim right over, do not exist, then the rest of it is void. These kinds of things cannot be assumed. There has to be physical evidence. It cannot be just because someone is at a certain location, at a certain moment in time, and because of this, all these things just magically apply to everyone, right? If that were the case, then how many people were coerced into signing a plea bargain, which is a voluntary contract to do something, and consent to the giving up of their rights, when they should of never been in the situation in the first place? This has irritated me to my soul. I am sure I will hear some replies that think i am dumb, or just not learned enough in the law in order to understand. But that statement in, and of itself is a huge problem, because in order for all of these codes and statutes to be enforced because of some agreement they think people have, and have an obligation to, by some mysterious assumed contract or something, is absurd. I never signed anything agreeing to any of these things. If anyone has proof, I am totally open to having my mind changed, but in order for a contract to be enforceable, every party to the contract has to have clarification, and understanding, as to each and every part of that contract. And there has to be consideration by both sides. What exactly is the consideration for those not on the side of the court, etc. That we do not have to go to prison? That people with badges and guns won't shoot us, take our vehicles and homes, and will not throw us in a cage for years of our lives, forever branded as a criminal, and barring people from any kind of meaningful outlook as to the economic status for the rest of their lives? Again, I am not in law school, but that is a stretch of any imagination, wouldn't you say? To me that sounds like duress, coercion, and conspiracy. I welcome anything that will help me to understand this. Please share. For now, I am going to go see about purchasing some older and new law texts, and search the bound volumes of the supreme court, and see what I can find. Thank you for allowing me to share and participate in your video and teachings.
You are awake, and you see the real picture, we are dealing with a mafia pretending to be Mr.Government, it's all a fraud, judges are not really a judge, they are administrators, our Courts are all operating under color of law to deal with our colorful (fake) money, we the real Americans have more authority than any police do, we are the real Sovereign people born with unalienable rights that was given to us by God and the planet, this thing calling itself government takes our sovereignty away from us by tricking us into signing contracts with them, everytime we put our signature on anything dealing with this gov takes more and more of our sovereignty from us, i apologize for going off over it, i am sickened by the whole System as it's clearly corrupted to the core.
@@bornfree3124 thank you, and i agree. but, man onky has rights that he is willing to defend. remember, even if it pains us, and they may not deserve it, we must also defend the rights of all others, no matter what. if we do not see us stand up for others, then others will not trust us or help us when the time comes. it is hard to endure the willful ignorance that has overtaken people. and scarier, they are seemingly willing to perish for it. i think that some truly agree with these views, and support it, because alone, they could never committ the atrocities that are being promoted, and need this to happen in order to bring them to fruition. and, lately, the closer to someone you are, or the longer you have known them, the apt they are now, to turn out to be a huge, untrustworthy, piece of shit. i would enjoy corresponding with you via email. if i can figure out how to get mine to you without making it public, i will do so.
thanks for the encouragement
Go over the two categories of due process. Procedural and substantive. This way people won't be held accountable to unjust laws that do not necessarily apply.
If I have an active library card that is sparsely used, sounds like THEY cannot use that for general juris'n, only for related (specific) jurisdiction. That is how I am hearing it. I do not live in the municipality; (public policy enforcement matter, without consent, on private land without express contracts of any kind; no harm, no foul).
Can I hire you to tutor me on this concept? 2 hour phone ?
Yes, check out our website: personalbarprep.com
Is this personam jurisdiction?
May GOD bless and protect you! GOD is good! GOD is love in times of hate, GOD is strength in times of weakness, GOD is light in times of darkness, GOD is harmony in times of chaos, and GOD is all you need! If you need more love/strenght/anything GOD is there! GOD LOVES YOU AND JESUS LOVES YOU! GOD BLESS!
Somebody is obviously cent sore eeng, comments here.
The defendant is a fool. Don't be a fool.
Can you be guilty of murder by stabbing a corpse, certified dead
Wow isnt it awesome that we give all our power to government instead of our creator !
Super helpful! Thank you!