Civil Procedure: Diversity Jurisdiction (28 U.S.C. § 1332) (Pt 1: Complete Diversity Requirement)

SdĂ­let
VloĆŸit
  • čas pƙidĂĄn 12. 07. 2024
  • 📄 FREE CIVIL PROCEDURE OUTLINE
    Download here: link coming soon.
    📚 LAW SCHOOL & BAR EXAM PREP
    Law school prep: studicata.com/law-school
    Bar exam prep: studicata.com/bar-exam
    Free courses: studicata.com/free-courses
    ❀ COMMUNITY & REVIEWS
    Community: studicata.com/groups/community
    Testimonials: studicata.com/testimonials-an...
    Submit a review: shoutout.studicata.com
    đŸ“± TECH
    iOS app: studicata.com/ios
    Android app: studicata.com/android
    📣 ABOUT
    Studicata provides a fresher, more relatable way to prep for law school finals and the bar exam. With top-rated video lectures, exam walkthrough videos, outlines, study guides, strategy guides, essay practice exams, multiple-choice assessments, performance tracking, and more-Studicata has you covered with everything you need to ace your finals and pass the bar exam with confidence.
    Email: info@studicata.com
    Learn more: studicata.com
    🎬 VIDEO INFO
    Civil Procedure: Diversity Jurisdiction (28 U.S.C. § 1332) (Pt 1: Complete Diversity Requirement)
    00:00 Introduction
    00:09 Requirements for a Court to Hear and Decide a Case
    00:35 How a Federal Court Obtains Subject-Matter Jurisdiction
    01:21 Diversity Jurisdiction Under 28 U.S.C. § 1332
    04:26 Practice Problem 1.0
    10:47 Practice Problem 1.1
    13:57 Complete Diversity Under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)
    15:55 Timing Issues in the Diversity Analysis
    18:56 Complete Diversity Under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1)
    22:18 Complete Diversity Under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(2)
    25:00 Practice Problem 2.0
    27:23 Practice Problem 2.1
    29:16 Complete Diversity Under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(3)
    30:20 Practice Problem 3.0
    35:52 Complete Diversity Under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(4)
    36:59 Determining Citizenship of the Parties
    38:20 Determining Citizenship: Individuals ("Natural Persons")
    41:07 Determining Citizenship: Corporations
    42:05 "Nerve Center" Test (Hertz Corp. v. Friend, 559 U.S. 77 (2010))
    44:57 Practice Problem 4.0 (Part 1)
    47:56 Practice Problem 4.0 (Part 2)
    50:40 Practice Problem 4.0 (Part 3)
    53:01 Determining Citizenship: Unincorporated Associations
    54:38 Determining Citizenship: Class Actions
    55:47 Practice Problem 5.0
    1:00:03 Conclusion
    Primary sources of law for this video:
    See U.S. Const. art. III, § 2; 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331-1332, 1367.
    See U.S. Const. amend. IV, § 1; International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 316 (1945).
    See 28 U.S.C. § 1391.
    See Belleville Catering v. Champaign Market Place, 350 F.3d 691 (7th Cir. 2003); Cosgrove v. Bartolotta, 150 F.3d 729 (7th Cir. 1998).
    Hertz Corp. v. Friend, 559 U.S. 77 (2010).
    Learn more: studicata.com

Komentáƙe • 12

  • @sheillahmengesa4493
    @sheillahmengesa4493 Pƙed 9 dny

    Thank you very much, you made this so easy for me.

  • @drt7022
    @drt7022 Pƙed 3 měsĂ­ci

    Thank you for these!!!

  • @ningzhang7636
    @ningzhang7636 Pƙed 5 měsĂ­ci

    Thank you so much!

  • @sol_pinegrove
    @sol_pinegrove Pƙed 9 měsĂ­ci +1

    Thank you❀

  • @pamscasa
    @pamscasa Pƙed 8 měsĂ­ci +2

    It is broken down so well that I actually get it. Hopefully, it will click in order to write out essays.

  • @MiamiSun40
    @MiamiSun40 Pƙed 5 měsĂ­ci +1

    Suppose, P from NY for example, moved to a foreign state permanently, returns to visit family in NY and wishes to sue a NY resident, could diversity jurisdiction be applicable or would their most previous US domicile remain relevant as they are an American citizen? Does their foreign domicile mean they are treated as a foreign citizen for jurisdictional purposes? Would it be different if they still had a NY address or US bank account?

  • @zarayan7307
    @zarayan7307 Pƙed 9 měsĂ­ci

    Thank you! Can you please add a Professional Responsibility course to Leap?

  • @user-de9os2xw1o
    @user-de9os2xw1o Pƙed 7 měsĂ­ci +1

    Y'all got that outline? Lol

  • @jeffh.2588
    @jeffh.2588 Pƙed 9 měsĂ­ci

    At 22:02, this video conflicts with your video "How to Analyze Diversity Jurisdiction on a Civil Procedure Essay" at 8:30. Am I missing something?

    • @jeffh.2588
      @jeffh.2588 Pƙed 9 měsĂ­ci

      22:02 also conflicts with 41:00 in the same video.

    • @alliescholten9238
      @alliescholten9238 Pƙed 7 měsĂ­ci

      From everything I have learned and is outlined by Richard Freer there is no such thing as a dual citizen of states. You can only ever be domicile in one state at a time. Currently studying for my finals and I have looked in three different textbooks and the BARBRI resources to verify. I think there’s just an error in this video.

    • @studicata
      @studicata  Pƙed 7 měsĂ­ci +5

      ​@@alliescholten9238 This is only true for individuals (i.e., an individual can only be a citizen of one state at a time for diversity purposes). However, a corporation holds dual citizenship for diversity purposes (its state of incorporation AND its principal place of business). See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1). In the example at 22:02, it is explained that P3 is a corporation.
      Determining citizenship for diversity purposes is explained in comprehensive detail starting at 38:21 of this video.
      Thank you for bringing this up!