Civil Procedure: Federal Question Jurisdiction (28 U.S.C. § 1331)
Vložit
- čas přidán 2. 08. 2024
- 📄 FREE CIVIL PROCEDURE OUTLINE
Download here: link coming soon.
📚 LAW SCHOOL & BAR EXAM PREP
Law school prep: studicata.com/law-school
Bar exam prep: studicata.com/bar-exam
Free courses: studicata.com/free-courses
❤️ COMMUNITY & REVIEWS
Community: studicata.com/groups/community
Testimonials: studicata.com/testimonials-an...
Submit a review: shoutout.studicata.com
📱 TECH
iOS app: studicata.com/ios
Android app: studicata.com/android
📣 ABOUT
Studicata provides a fresher, more relatable way to prep for law school finals and the bar exam. With top-rated video lectures, exam walkthrough videos, outlines, study guides, strategy guides, essay practice exams, multiple-choice assessments, performance tracking, and more-Studicata has you covered with everything you need to ace your finals and pass the bar exam with confidence.
Email: info@studicata.com
Learn more: studicata.com
🎬 VIDEO INFO
Civil Procedure: Federal Question Jurisdiction (28 U.S.C. § 1331)
00:00 Introduction
00:10 Requirements for a Court to Hear and Decide a Case
00:50 How a Federal Court Obtains Subject-Matter Jurisdiction
01:47 Components of Federal Question Jurisdiction
02:54 Constitutional Component (Article III, § 2)
04:07 Osborn v. Bank of the United States, 22 U.S. 738 (1824)
06:56 Statutory Component (28 U.S.C. § 1331)
08:00 "Arise Under" Federal Law Requirement
10:07 Well-Pleaded Complaint Rule
10:28 Louisville & Nashville R.R. Company v. Mottley, 211 U.S. 149 (1908)
13:51 Defendant's Response is Irrelevant
17:35 Significance Rule
19:28 Creation Test
22:23 Grable Test
24:41 Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson, 478 U.S. 804 (1986)
28:41 Grable & Sons Metal Prods., Inc. v. Darue Eng'g & Mfg., 545 U.S. 308 (2005)
36:38 Conclusion
Primary sources of law for this video:
See U.S. Const. art. III, § 2; 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331-1332, 1367.
See U.S. Const. amend. IV, § 1; International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 316 (1945).
See 28 U.S.C. § 1391.
Osborn v. U.S. Bank, 22 U.S. 738 (1824).
See American Well Works v. Layne, 241 U.S. 257 (1916).
See Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. Mottley, 211 U.S. 149 (1908).
E.g., Franchise Tax Bd. v. Laborers Vacation Trust, 463 U.S. 1 (1983); Caterpillar Inc. v. Williams, 482 U.S. 386 (1987); Holmes Grp., v. Vornado Air Circulation Sys., Inc., 535 U.S. 826 (2002).
See Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson, 478 U.S. 804 (1986).
See Grable & Sons Metal Prods., Inc. v. Darue Eng'g & Mfg., 545 U.S. 308 (2005).
Learn more: studicata.com
Keep these videos coming! They are amazing!
Thank you so much for this lesson. It was really easy to follow and I was able to understand to.concept of federal question jurisdiction much better!
Awesome-I'm glad it was helpful for you!
When I get to the supreme Court pro SE I'm buy you all a round. But really thanks studicata and you tube team's 👍🏼👍🏼💯
Really enjoyed this video. Could you provide a link for the outline mentioned?
I thank you so much for putting this together.
Excellent lesson! Thank you!
In a federal question action, are any and all following claims under jurisdiction because it started as a federal question or do we have to check for supplemental jurisdiction?
What's ddcb?
Life saver 🙏
...as you ask for profits to fix the issues while ignoring me and the declaration of independence.
🔥 🔥 🔥 ✌️
...and the evidence given against you according to the constitution.