I think you are missing the point. It's a right, no one owes you or anyone else justification by stating a need. Just as free speech doesn't require you to state a need before you are allowed to speak your mind.
@@dirt111112 because it’s nobody’s fucking business why someone else needs something, it’s their right to do what they want, just like you can’t explain why you need to be a pansy and go against our second amendment
GoodTimeTraveler you seem to have it backwards anyone can 2A especially 4A but the people who wrote it down clearly knew 1A was written first while they argued which order was more important; 3A with 2A only after 1A isn’t enough. Unfortunately police aren’t 3A if they have 4A. But hey at least you have 5A just in case and so on
@@keni95851 All of mankind is deserving of these rights. Whether you believe in a higher power of not, the fact of the matter is that government is OUR servant, not the other way around. They never had jurisdiction to take what cannot even be administered. For rights cannot be given, we have them naturally.
This story made me think of the time I first went shooting, it was a Glock 19, Walther PPS, and a CZ 75. What spoke out to me the most when I was at the range was how heavy the guns were and how it inspired me to be Pro-2nd Amendment and influenced me to want to become a gun owner in the future. Why the weight of the gun spoke out stuck out the most was because it taught me something, to have such a small device need so much discipline and control, gave me a little hint into what it must've been like to be a gun owner. To have the power to end a life with 5 lbs. of pressure from your finger, the responsibility that hangs over your head, the precautions you must take to make sure such a device doesn't get into the wrong hands inspired me. I wanted to have that sense of discipline and responsibility, I also realized that having a gun didn't make me feel powerful, it made me more careful, it led me to follow every instruction that was given to me, and led me to ask for advice from other people at the range. I do want to own a gun to have that right to be able to defend myself, but I want to learn that responsibility of being a gun owner and have that responsibility as an adult, I want to be able to exercise my right to the 2nd Amendment, and I want to be able to have that extra bit of security, in case if the worst comes.
@@D-Rock420 I'm personally just fine with children, felons and the untreated mentally ill not having guns. You agree with that? Or are you two THAT absolutist about it?
@@ryandonovan5895 I'd ask you to define "mentally ill" before we discuss whether the people who fit in that category should or shouldn't have firearms.
forget the nra for a moment, this is a fan-freakin-tastic story of some1 coming to understand the firearm tool that lead them to embrace the 2a and constitution as a whole. good for u, man
The weirdest part about this whole argument to me. Is that you’re arguing to take guns away from people who haven’t ever done anything wrong. Like 4 percent of gun related crime is done by people with legally owned fire arms. Do you think criminals will turn in there unregistered guns if the law told them to do so? Do you not think Mexico and South America wouldn’t just ship up guns along with the drugs they send to this country already? Do you not know that London just passed NY CITY in its murder rate and they don’t even have guns there people are just stabbing eachother to death that much? What kinda fairytale land are you living in.
Patrick Leathers they always like to point at the UK “UK has low crime rates and it has strict gun laws” but that’s bc UK has never had much crime in the first place. It’s misguided thinking you can take away people’s guns. There’s simply too much of them and our circumstances don’t allow for it. Why don’t we look at the real issue like the mental health of the one weilding the gun. It’s juvenile to just blame the inanimate object.
Are facts racist? Here is some evidence...Chicago is roughly 42% white/other, 33% black, 20% Hispanic, 5% Asian. Murder victims 2017: 20 white - 527 black - 116 Hispanic. heyjackass.com/category/2017-stats/
Who's... who's arguing for taking away people's guns? You know that's a minority opinion, right? Most gun control supporters don't want a mass gun confiscation. How comes every conversation about potential gun control dissolves to this myth about repealing the 2nd amendment?
I've always had a deep respect for you Joe, even more so now with this conversation. I've never heard of this young man before. listening to him speak so eloquently and intelligently about firearms at his age is impressive. What impresses me even more so is you letting your podcast shine a light on a subject which so many people perceived as a volatile conversation that should only be argued and not civilly conversed about. I am a gun owner and an NRA member.
I am an old white woman and a gun advocate. I would like to see more responsible young people learn that guns are a tool, albeit a deadly one. Just a tool that every responsible person in the U.S.A. has a right to own.
Lol tool? Its primary function is set to be a weapon. Thats a dumb argument. You like weapons? Then, own it.. Its a gun , a weapon , not a paint brush , or table saw . Guns are weapons ... and personally they are all over the place in the united states.. its sad that there is high gun violence in your urban areas.. im not saying im against owning a weapon.. weapons can be used to hunt and kill.. so w.e just stop calling a hand gun a fucking tool thats some dumb shit.
Not a big gun guy but this was a hell of a good episode, he's a great speaker, brought up a lot of good points for this whole debate. Would love to see more of him on.
@@aleck5431 im glad youre one of the people that can recognise the main reason you want it to be legal is purely because you enjoy it, which is a perfectly valid reason, instead of making up some bullshit about it being necessary for your families protection
We don't have to ban cars -- but we do have speed limits, MPG restrictions, age limits, the DMV, certain tests for various types of vehicles, even background checks, and so on.
Driving is not a right. Driving is a privilege. This is why your ability to drive can be removed fairly easily. Owning a firearm is a right, guaranteed by the Constitution. Removing an individual's right to own a firearm or put qualifiers on it, takes something extraordinary to happen, like the person committing a felony that they are then convicted of in a court of law. Why is it so difficult for people to understand this concept?
@@CD-pj5qi False. It was made because every human has the right to defend themselves and each other by any means necessary. Also, self defence will never become outdated. Especially since the government has used Covid-19 as a way to steal more power for themselves. Not to mention that criminals will never cease to exist. Your point is very childish and naive.
Saying you are a liberal DOES NOT mean that you have to agree with every single thing the left supports. This is why identity politics is not good for America.
Don’t get caught up in identity politics Jeremy. Having different beliefs is what we are as people. Creating barriers of thought is why this identity bullshit is so fuckedz
Joe's a Joe today. He has liberal stances on some issues, conservative stances on some issues, and somewhere in-between for some issues. Do yourself a favor and drop your tribal approach to politics.
A drunk driver kills someone the blame goes to the person and not the alcohol or the car. A knife kills someone the blame goes to the person and not the knife. An officer kills someone with a gun they call it police brutality. A civilian kills someone with a gun and they blame the gun. ...How does that work?
one of those guys No shit genius, but there are ways to safely limit guns to nutjobs Any other ordinary person won't have an issue obtaining a legal weapon of choice
Oscar Angulo Laws only matter to those that choose to obey them. We should just make murder and theft illegal, that would solve everything. AMIRITE? GTFOH with your tripe. Also you missed the whole point of SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!
Its not complicated. "Shall not be infringed" isn't difficult to understand. It doesn't need to be interpreted. If the left wants to repeal the second amendment, that process is laid out in the constitution. It has to be agreed upon by both houses of congress and the Executive branch, then it has to ratified by 2/3 of all state legislatures. Its a high bar for a reason.
Typical response, did you see the comma that separates the two statements? But I'll indulge you, who makes up the militia? By definition, what is a militia?
In the parlance of the day, "well regulated" simply meant well trained. Look it up. And it guarantees the right of "the people" to maintain arms, not the states. Look at the Federalist Papers, particularly Federalist 46. James Madison lays it all out. The second amendment exists to provide a counter balance to government power and the founders viewed a well armed populace as essential to the survival of a free people. (Its not about hunting or shooting a burglar. That was just assumed to be totally obvious) Privately owned cannons were covered by the second amendment back in the day in fact.
5point 5six that’s the best you got? I’m not Dem nor Republican.... I don’t live in boxes! Nor do I live on plantations.... he’s a phuck boy, just like you.
I grew up with a loaded gun under the sofa. We knew it was there. We didn't touch it. Our gun never jumped out from under the sofa and shoot anyone. It just lay there, waiting on someone to clean it intermittently.
First gun I owned was an XD 40. I didn’t think it was “too much caliber”. But more to the point. I’m not surprised, but never thought of it, that NRA members don’t commit “evil acts” with guns. Who is this dude? More articulate than I am on this subject. Want to hear more of him.
Here is a link to his videos on gun reviews he does to get a feel. His articulation pretty much translate through every video... Great stuff and great editing. czcams.com/video/gto2DCm6Lx4/video.html
This dude is awesome, I had no idea he was only introduced to firearms after adulthood, good to see even one person see the other side of the 2A community
Not really. Rogan tries to shove a stupid argument "no member of the NRA has ever done X". Well sure, the NRA has a lot of good responsible shooters. It's one of the things they teach. But the fearmongering they spew is very much in the American popular consciousness and foments violent rhetoric.
What I hate is how often anti gunners bring up the NRA... I think most gun owners don’t “support” the NRA In fact I find more people who think the NRA hurts gun rights more than it supports gun rights
Has he talked about the youtube headquarters getting shot up yet? I'd love to get Joes take on why the media didn't cover it much. Could be because a female, vegan, Muslim, woman done it in a gun free zone in one of the strictest gun law states. If the focus wasn't on the tool and more on the people and a way to prevent these atrocities, things might actually change.
Unfortunately the GOA doesn't have the voice and the pull of the NRA in the political sphere. GOA needs to become more mainstream so we can retire the NRA.
BOB honestly no company will support a group that is 100% against regulation. It’s a bad business move and I’m sorry but the majority of people and gun owners don’t feel the way you do.
As an NRA life member. I would not suggest joining. I cannot get any help with anything that has to do with a gun. Every time I go online for the NRA there is nowhere to log in. But it will ask you if you want to become a member. I have been buying guns for a while now. Just went in to buy another one. I got a DENY from the FBI. As a lifetime member they have no idea how to help me. What are they good for??? There is no way to ask them questions, and if you do have a question about guns. They do not know the answer. Do not join the NRA.
Thank you for explaining your experience with the NRA. What are your thoughts on GOA? Any advice will be greatly appreciated. Take Care & Stay Vigilant ⚔️
Most people today will not realize how important the second amendment is until we’re in a situation where we all need them in our hands and don’t have them.
Really Bob, history would say otherwise. Look at Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan. All wars where U.S. troops with all their air superiority and tanks etc struggled to fight off the local insurgents. We the people, if it came to "that" would fair just fine.
Vietnam deaths: ALLIED (47 000); NVA/VC (444 000) CIVILIANS (627 000) Your definition of fine is different to mine. This, also in a time where killing is nowhere near as efficient as it is now. There are arguments for guns (not many), but keeping you safe from governments is not one of them.
I really, really would like to know what situation that might be. Because frankly, I've no idea what the fuck y'all are thinking. What situation might occur where you need to have guns? Not just hunting rifles or shotguns, but assault rifles? And don't give me any bullshit about "assault rifle isn't a thing." I'm an Army veteran. I know what an assault rifle is. I know what they're designed to do and I know in detail how they differ from hunting rifles. So stow that nonsense and tell me exactly when you think Americans will need to have military weaponry.
Damn that brother just spoke more truth than anyone I've heard in a long time ... white, hispanic, black american period. Truth does & always should transcend race & social status. 💯 agree with him.
Proxxiy you know fuck all. Lots of guns here in KY and no school shootings. Fucking idiot. The CULTURE changed and stopped embracing Americanism. Became more like socialists in urban areas. And socialists and anarchists are killers. Now, piss off dunce.
@@Varama Shootings have been going down since the 1990s yet there are more guns than ever. Oh do you mean someone could get an illegal gun. Crazy how crazy people do crazy things but hey like less than one percent of the population commit crimes yet we all are fucked up. Use your brain next time you post.
The right to self defense is deeper than a human right. It's an animal right. The 2nd amendment acknowledges your animal right to defend yourself as vigerously as you can muster.
jackhandy00 NO. The 2nd amendment guarantees the citizen the right to overthrow our elected government. It's to keep the government in check. To fight against tyrannical governments. To remind the government who is really in power (citizens)
Marius Dicpetris ????? I hope you don't mean we are killing each other with gun by tens of thousands each year.... That simply isn't true. Cite your source... Don't perpetuate falsehoods to match your agenda. Car kill more people every year than guns do. Obesity kills more people every year than firearms do. Should we ban cars and fat people?...
There's no such thing as an "animal right". Animals have no concept of rights. Lmao. Rights don't actually exist, you know? They're things we've made up but we've agreed to abide by them. You think people should have the right to defend themselves as vigorously as they can muster. So does that mean you think citizens should be allowed to own rocket launchers? Tanks? Mines? If not,, you already disagree with your own argument.
Shannon Farrell Note though that cars have a ton of regulations and laws attached to them. Note that people need a license to drive a car, and they can have their license taken away. Also note that cars have a cvital purpose in our society and it would cease to function without them. And banning fat people is a stupid idea to combat obesity. That's a dumb argument because nobody's suggesting banning gun owners. Obesity also doesn't kill anyone but yourself.
Here's a great analogy: If a carpenter builds you a house, and the house falls down and kills someone, do you blame the hammer? Do you seek to ban hammers? No. The *carpenter* gets the blame, _their_ training, _their_ intention, _their_ skills get the scrutiny... No one looks at the hammer and thinks that is the problem.
Hey Joe, first off love the channel and the topics you come to the table with. This is such a good topic and I really hope that all those who follow your channel take the time to listen to it all the way through. We have a lot in common and I've watched your stuff for years through different platforms. Love Steve Rinella, Cam Hanes (I'm a born and raised Oregonian), various MMA channels, and the list can go on. Anyway, your channel reaches so many people including those that oppose everything you say. I'm an NRA member, avid Bowhunter, OHA, RMEF, and a couple others that give to conservation of animals, and their habitat. Keep doing what you're doing. Love it!
The NRA has sponsored more laws on regulations than any other "gun rights" group. They wrote the background check legislation. The NRA is on the govts side. If you wanna support 2A that would be the GOA. Any restrictions or regulations go directly against the most important words of the amendment. SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!
Also says under a well regulated militia. Btw the amendment was written in a pretty vague sense and with no foresight as to how powerful these weapons would become.
ok this is just more government propaganda, (had a quick look at colins channel) If you really like guns go watch demolition ranch (my fav) just for one
I hate when people use the “cars can be weapons too” argument...yes a car, knife, bat, chain saw, etc, etc can be used as a weapon to cause harm, but all those objects are used primarily for other non lethal purposes. A gun has only one purpose and that is to kill or threaten to kill another living thing. That’s why they should be regulated JUST LIKE CARS ARE!!
They ARE regulated! You don't just walk into Bass Proshops, plop down your money and walk out with a firearm! There's a test, background check and in most states a multiday waiting period!!
You get rid of guns like in the UK and China they just replace it with mass stabbings which happens all the time in those countries and elsewhere! Number 1 cause of murder is hands and feet guns are further down the list and rifles at the bottom..
I'm a 11 year Marine vet, a gun owner, an NRA member...and a black male in his 30s. And I condemn the mass shootings, the needless killing of my fellow black men by police and the general discord in this country surrounding firearms. The problem isn't guns, it's people. Same way you wouldn't let someone with extreme mental health issues operate a vehicle...so to shouldn't they be allowed to operate or own a firearm. We need better tests and failsafea to insure they have no access to them...NOT banning firearms or amending the 2A. I'm a card carrying liberal, but the left are definitely addressing the gun debate in America completely wrong.
Cars aren’t built to kill people though. Cars are for transportation. Guns are specifically made for killing. That point was not the greatest. Also this guest should understand that back in the 1960’s once the panthers started legally exercising the 2nd amendment, most state and the federal government moved very quickly to enact laws that prevented them from doing so. My point being this country and the people are very select at who should own and carry those said weapons.
Gun Owners of America >>>>>>>>>> NRA. I love Colion a lot & he's a great guy.....but GOA is actually fighting for preserving & RESTORING all of our 2A rights, unlike the NRA. The NRA is only for maintaining the status quo...just like establishment Republicans. This is NOT a helpful strategy for maintaining the 2nd rights of Americans b/c the anti-gun people are going to win sometimes (It's just a reality) and the NRA has decided to just let them have their occasional "wins" in order to not rock the boat. They need to fight for restoring rights. They need to be like GOA.
There is absolutely NO comparison between cars and guns. Guns are ONLY meant for destruction. Period. Whether or not the thing one is destroying had it coming, or not, whether it's an empty bottle, or a deer, or a human being, guns can only destroy. Cars are for the purpose of transportation, regardless of the way people abuse them. You're child isn't going to get his head blown off from touching an idle car the wrong way. Bullshit analogy, Rogan.
Duck Landes myself being a gun owner I'm for the right to bear arm's. But hearing people say stupid shit like your post. I understand why anti-gun people think most gun owners are dumb loser's.
I thought my comment was "stupid" enough that intelligent people would know it was tongue in cheek. A joke that demonstrates how "stupid" it is to blame a tool rather than the person misusing the tool. I guess it went right over your head. Sorry to have triggered you with my joke.
Doom Penguin A kid in my 8th grade class stabbed another kid through the throat with a bic pen, and I personally got stabbed in the shoulder with a pencil. Never been shot. Therefor pencils are more dangerous than guns by my experience.
Though my original comment was said tongue in cheek, there is a ring of truth behind it. More than 1000 school children, in California alone, are seriously injured each year by "school supplies" (pens and pencils) in school yard brawls. In the U.S. there are more than 230 pencil related deaths a year.
My first gun was a DD44 Dostovei, and then I traded it in for an RC-P90, but it's illegal because it's fully automatic and fires 80 rounds at a time. I'd shot a Klobb before, but it was weak. I also have a Cougar Magnum and a D5K Deutsche.
The day I legally bought my own firearms was one of the greatest days of my life I truly felt I was an American. - I am a staunch advocate of private gun ownership I believe in the right to Home self defense and sport shooting. God Bless NRA
If an object you simply purchased makes you feel any more or less belonging to a society, you're a moron. Same goes for the idiots that care about flags and rituals but not their fellow Americans.
Raul- What does me owning a firearm have to do with anyone else, I’m not a criminal and why should I be punished for the actions of one person, that’s the question that no one can ever answer, and come on you think the European governments care about their people, what about Australia’s or Canada’s, they are intentionally flooding their countries with the shittiest possible people you could find.
Great conversation! Every human being does have the right to defend their life, liberty and that of their loved ones. No amendment necessary, but it is there to that end.
Driving cars is a bad analogy just because cars utility is so woven into everyday society that we cannot get rid of them. Guns are not. You can easily go through your life without a gun, it's a challenge to go through life without a car. I'm not saying anything on gun control, I'm only saying that the analogy is not a great comparison.
I wish there was another national firearms association I could join besides the NRA. Because I’m a gun owner and the NRA which refuses to support or endorse what I would consider reasonable gun control measures does not line up with so many of the beliefs in this country that most gun owners hold. There are WAY more than 5 million gun owners in the USA and yet the NRA only has 5 million numbers. What does this tell you?
No your right to a firearm is not a natural given human right, it's a right you have as an American, some other coutnries would grant you that right too, this guy is just wrong.
That the NRA was started by veterans of the Civil War doesn't surprise people, that it was started by UNION/Yankee vets really annoys the Guns 'n' Confederate Flags crowd.
@Bro Spec People die everyday. You've just chosen to hone your focus on gun violence. If the US was how you claim it to be, people wouldn't be clamoring from all over to get here.
Cars have more use than guns. That's why we don't ban cars, but we have laws that suppress cars, we have speed limits, seat belts, we make the roads with curves so cars can go faster around them. We don't have much for guns.
Do you have a right to have a grenade? Or a tank? Or chemical weapons? We obviously draw the line somewhere. The argument is about where that line should lay.
@@marlinmurrell620 the NRA and many politicians are opposed to passing legislation on universal background checks. They’ll oppose waiting periods, they will oppose anything that might decrease the number of guns being sold in any way.
He makes a perfect argument for anyone to be able to own a fully functioning tank, or nuclear weapon. Fine, it is a right. You accept the consequences. America is truly unique.
I respectfully disagree- I think when one asks a question like “do you need an AR15”; they’re not questioning your second amendment right, because that’s inalienable. They’re questioning whether you are extending beyond the limits that our forefathers imagined. When they drafted the first amendment, they certainly wouldn’t think to allow all speech. The same applies to every single other amendment. It’s about reasonable restrictions. It’s what John Locke wrote about; giving up a portion of your rights (not your rights in entirety) for the welfare of all people under that government.
rascalMatt17 I am a natural born US citizen. I took AP Government. I think I know what the first amendment says. By instituting things like stricter background checks, your rights aren’t being infringed upon; instead they are checked by the government to ensure that you are acting in a lawful manner.
You are an idiot, don't speak for the founding fathers about the 2nd amendment unless you educate yourself in their intent. You have no idea what you are talking about
I've introduced quite a few people to shooting guns for the first time, and ALL of them are amazed by the power, and LOVE how fun it is to shoot a gun safely. Teaching those people the essentials of gun safety is also very important, which is what I do right off the bat.
When the 2nd was written, the colonies had been constantly harassed by British soldiers who, among other things, confiscated weapons they thought could be used against them. Therefore, it was written to say that a state (a political entity) would not be free unless its citizens could organize a response to an enemy. The main idea is that taking someone's guns away needed to be criminalized to make oppressing us unattractive. Now, at that time we didn't have the layers of law enforcement and national defense that we now have but the 2nd is written with no stipulations and is therefore enshrined as a basic right of the US citizen.
Its not called the Bill of needs for a reason, its The Bill of Rights.
Granted! Yet, still can't provide an answer regarding need
I think you are missing the point. It's a right, no one owes you or anyone else justification by stating a need. Just as free speech doesn't require you to state a need before you are allowed to speak your mind.
Tim Williams
Well one is an established right and the other talking point is talk at the dinner table.
@@dirt111112 Do you want me to explain the importance of an amendment just ask.
@@dirt111112 because it’s nobody’s fucking business why someone else needs something, it’s their right to do what they want, just like you can’t explain why you need to be a pansy and go against our second amendment
"I just contained an explosion in my hand" giggitty!
There is no 1A without 2A
GoodTimeTraveler you seem to have it backwards anyone can 2A especially 4A but the people who wrote it down clearly knew 1A was written first while they argued which order was more important; 3A with 2A only after 1A isn’t enough. Unfortunately police aren’t 3A if they have 4A. But hey at least you have 5A just in case and so on
@@toad5769 I thought all rights came from the mystical man in the sky. Now you're saying they come from each other...
@Melancholy Soldier Then why do we cling to those MAN MADE "rules" like they're divine intervention?
@@toad5769 He means that you can only fight to keep your rights if you have the means to do so. E.G: guns.
@@keni95851 All of mankind is deserving of these rights. Whether you believe in a higher power of not, the fact of the matter is that government is OUR servant, not the other way around. They never had jurisdiction to take what cannot even be administered. For rights cannot be given, we have them naturally.
This story made me think of the time I first went shooting, it was a Glock 19, Walther PPS, and a CZ 75. What spoke out to me the most when I was at the range was how heavy the guns were and how it inspired me to be Pro-2nd Amendment and influenced me to want to become a gun owner in the future. Why the weight of the gun spoke out stuck out the most was because it taught me something, to have such a small device need so much discipline and control, gave me a little hint into what it must've been like to be a gun owner. To have the power to end a life with 5 lbs. of pressure from your finger, the responsibility that hangs over your head, the precautions you must take to make sure such a device doesn't get into the wrong hands inspired me. I wanted to have that sense of discipline and responsibility, I also realized that having a gun didn't make me feel powerful, it made me more careful, it led me to follow every instruction that was given to me, and led me to ask for advice from other people at the range. I do want to own a gun to have that right to be able to defend myself, but I want to learn that responsibility of being a gun owner and have that responsibility as an adult, I want to be able to exercise my right to the 2nd Amendment, and I want to be able to have that extra bit of security, in case if the worst comes.
A black nra member. THE LEFTS WORST NIGHTMARE
A black man that voted for Trump. LEFTS SECOND WORST NIGHTMARE
I just joined.
I support gun ownership but let be honest nra has racist history when comes to black gun ownership. I citing the Mulford act as an example
NRA is trash. The 2nd is all you need the NRA is corrupt and only intended for let's be real white people
The asiatic Lion the police also had racist up bringings. But I still love them. Also this was just made. czcams.com/video/AIwXarl6w-M/video.html
Colion is the man. He's a good representative for our gun rights.
Stephen 1982 Philando Castile was also thought to be a good rep, ....
Yup, he seems calm and articulate. Problem is, not all gun awners are.
He’s just a slave for your white fear mongering agenda.
jam1148
I'm sure slaves in the 1850s would agree that having guns makes them slaves to their own fear lmao!
Yes he should be a politician it’s 3 and a half minutes and he has yet to talk about the NRA
“Shall not be infringed”. That’s all imma say
Tell that to Illinois, Michigan, California, etc.
@@D-Rock420 I'm personally just fine with children, felons and the untreated mentally ill not having guns. You agree with that? Or are you two THAT absolutist about it?
@@ryandonovan5895 so then what part of "shall not be infringed" are you not understanding?
@@ryandonovan5895 I'd ask you to define "mentally ill" before we discuss whether the people who fit in that category should or shouldn't have firearms.
@John Smith I do hope you're trolling. Don't think you are, though.
I canceled my NRA membership when it came out that Wayne Lapierre was spending millions of dollars on vacations and homes and private jets etc
forget the nra for a moment, this is a fan-freakin-tastic story of some1 coming to understand the firearm tool that lead them to embrace the 2a and constitution as a whole. good for u, man
The weirdest part about this whole argument to me. Is that you’re arguing to take guns away from people who haven’t ever done anything wrong. Like 4 percent of gun related crime is done by people with legally owned fire arms. Do you think criminals will turn in there unregistered guns if the law told them to do so? Do you not think Mexico and South America wouldn’t just ship up guns along with the drugs they send to this country already? Do you not know that London just passed NY CITY in its murder rate and they don’t even have guns there people are just stabbing eachother to death that much? What kinda fairytale land are you living in.
ALJustice0 lol basically get rid of every liberal city and we are the safest country. Chicago. NY Detroit
Patrick Leathers they always like to point at the UK “UK has low crime rates and it has strict gun laws” but that’s bc UK has never had much crime in the first place. It’s misguided thinking you can take away people’s guns. There’s simply too much of them and our circumstances don’t allow for it. Why don’t we look at the real issue like the mental health of the one weilding the gun. It’s juvenile to just blame the inanimate object.
Even in Chicago...if you are white and do not live in a gang infested part of the city you are as safe as the safest places in Europe.
Are facts racist? Here is some evidence...Chicago is roughly 42% white/other, 33% black, 20% Hispanic, 5% Asian. Murder victims 2017: 20 white - 527 black - 116 Hispanic.
heyjackass.com/category/2017-stats/
Who's... who's arguing for taking away people's guns? You know that's a minority opinion, right? Most gun control supporters don't want a mass gun confiscation. How comes every conversation about potential gun control dissolves to this myth about repealing the 2nd amendment?
I've always had a deep respect for you Joe, even more so now with this conversation. I've never heard of this young man before. listening to him speak so eloquently and intelligently about firearms at his age is impressive. What impresses me even more so is you letting your podcast shine a light on a subject which so many people perceived as a volatile conversation that should only be argued and not civilly conversed about. I am a gun owner and an NRA member.
I am a gun owner and an NRA member.
ok, im not...
crap, how to i fix this...
uh...
i am the batman!
robert paulson?
I am an old white woman and a gun advocate. I would like to see more responsible young people learn that guns are a tool, albeit a deadly one. Just a tool that every responsible person in the U.S.A. has a right to own.
Lol tool? Its primary function is set to be a weapon. Thats a dumb argument. You like weapons? Then, own it.. Its a gun , a weapon , not a paint brush , or table saw . Guns are weapons ... and personally they are all over the place in the united states.. its sad that there is high gun violence in your urban areas.. im not saying im against owning a weapon.. weapons can be used to hunt and kill.. so w.e just stop calling a hand gun a fucking tool thats some dumb shit.
Look up definition of tool matt states typically hand held item to carryout a specific task so yes its a tool you tool
@@mathieuperreault310 fail
@@mathieuperreault310 so you say its not a tool then say you use it to hunt you're an idiot
@@mathieuperreault310 weapon is just a subcategory of tool you brainlet.
Not a big gun guy but this was a hell of a good episode, he's a great speaker, brought up a lot of good points for this whole debate. Would love to see more of him on.
-Blackrock Wednesday- you’re racist
Colion has his own channel. Worth looking up
LOUIS XVII Wha...?
Gabriel m I'll have to check it out, thanks for the heads up!
Dudes channel is awesome, very smart gun guy.
Why does anyone NEED an AR15? Why did Rosa Parks NEED to sit at the front of the bus???
Col. Cotton Hill Lol I may be stupid, but wtf is your point?
Fake news. She never sat the front of the bus.
CreamyConcrete She tried....
Col. Cotton Hill Colion Noir actually posted a meme on Instagram with this exact statement. People were pissed!! 😂😂
@@aleck5431 im glad youre one of the people that can recognise the main reason you want it to be legal is purely because you enjoy it, which is a perfectly valid reason, instead of making up some bullshit about it being necessary for your families protection
We don't have to ban cars -- but we do have speed limits, MPG restrictions, age limits, the DMV, certain tests for various types of vehicles, even background checks, and so on.
You don't get a background check for a drivers licence... Also, having a car is not a right.
Driving is not a right. Driving is a privilege. This is why your ability to drive can be removed fairly easily. Owning a firearm is a right, guaranteed by the Constitution. Removing an individual's right to own a firearm or put qualifiers on it, takes something extraordinary to happen, like the person committing a felony that they are then convicted of in a court of law.
Why is it so difficult for people to understand this concept?
@@MattLovesVinyl They understand. They just don't like the answer. Tough titties for them though, because it's in the bill of R I G H T S.
Matthew Cafaro cause the 2nd amendment was made when guns were more of a necessity it’s since then became outdated
@@CD-pj5qi False. It was made because every human has the right to defend themselves and each other by any means necessary.
Also, self defence will never become outdated. Especially since the government has used Covid-19 as a way to steal more power for themselves. Not to mention that criminals will never cease to exist. Your point is very childish and naive.
Taurus pt111 subcompact
Joe: "that's a big fuckin gun"
😂 Joe doesn't know jack shit about guns
He literally clarified right after he meant the kick was big.
Joe's not a liberal today.
JeremyFacelift tomorrow with Whitney Cummins? He will be.
Saying you are a liberal DOES NOT mean that you have to agree with every single thing the left supports. This is why identity politics is not good for America.
Don’t get caught up in identity politics Jeremy. Having different beliefs is what we are as people. Creating barriers of thought is why this identity bullshit is so fuckedz
Joe's a Joe today. He has liberal stances on some issues, conservative stances on some issues, and somewhere in-between for some issues. Do yourself a favor and drop your tribal approach to politics.
Omega LUL ya I know some liberals that a very pro guns
This guest is a good one , very well reasoned and spoken
Joe may be the biggest flip-flopper of all time. He changes his opinions about everything depending on who he is talking to.
I think Noir is a great person to have as a NRA , and 2nd amendment advocate , but I think he should distance himself from Rogan .
Maybe he is open minded and wants them to finish their thoughts so he doesn't interrupt them and close them down
Deathless, I am a pro-gun guy but I can definitely agree with this statement
@David G. Obvious troll is obvious.
Well he's running the most popular podcast so he must be doing something right
A drunk driver kills someone the blame goes to the person and not the alcohol or the car.
A knife kills someone the blame goes to the person and not the knife.
An officer kills someone with a gun they call it police brutality.
A civilian kills someone with a gun and they blame the gun. ...How does that work?
Is it the bill of wants, the bill of needs? Bill of RIGHTS. We have the RIGHT to defend ourselves.
one of those guys
No shit genius, but there are ways to safely limit guns to nutjobs
Any other ordinary person won't have an issue obtaining a legal weapon of choice
Goddamn right.
2nd amendment is in the constitution not the bill of rights.
Oscar Angulo
Laws only matter to those that choose to obey them. We should just make murder and theft illegal, that would solve everything. AMIRITE? GTFOH with your tripe. Also you missed the whole point of SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!
Only if you’re in a militia.
Its not complicated. "Shall not be infringed" isn't difficult to understand. It doesn't need to be interpreted. If the left wants to repeal the second amendment, that process is laid out in the constitution. It has to be agreed upon by both houses of congress and the Executive branch, then it has to ratified by 2/3 of all state legislatures. Its a high bar for a reason.
Ian Medford well regulated isn't hard to understand either
WE ARE THE well regulated Militia FUCKTARD!
Typical response, did you see the comma that separates the two statements? But I'll indulge you, who makes up the militia? By definition, what is a militia?
Ichuka there is a comma between the two statements. Punctuation matters. *Black Rifles Matter*
In the parlance of the day, "well regulated" simply meant well trained. Look it up. And it guarantees the right of "the people" to maintain arms, not the states. Look at the Federalist Papers, particularly Federalist 46. James Madison lays it all out. The second amendment exists to provide a counter balance to government power and the founders viewed a well armed populace as essential to the survival of a free people. (Its not about hunting or shooting a burglar. That was just assumed to be totally obvious) Privately owned cannons were covered by the second amendment back in the day in fact.
This dude gets it
GOA not NRA. I left the NRA for the GOA.
Love me some Colion Noir. Great guest Joe!
EventHorizon the man is extremely intelligent, I enjoyed just hearing him talk
fuck you
Colion Noir, Clarence Thomas, OJ Simpson, Herman Cain, Ben Carson and Amarosa are a unique form of blacks, called “Thomas”
We Wuz King Eric ... keep regurgitating your Dem masters beliefs. When you're done get back to the plantation boy.
5point 5six that’s the best you got? I’m not Dem nor Republican.... I don’t live in boxes! Nor do I live on plantations.... he’s a phuck boy, just like you.
"U want to take a right from me that 100 yrs ago I wasn't considered human enough to have". Colion
This guy's awesome
I grew up with a loaded gun under the sofa. We knew it was there. We didn't touch it.
Our gun never jumped out from under the sofa and shoot anyone.
It just lay there, waiting on someone to clean it intermittently.
Joe flips and flops more than my flip flops. Btw I am the NRA. I have been the NRA since I was 18. Last year I became a lifetime member.
Gianna Filicia he doesn’t flip flop so much as he does try and be reasonable and understanding of the people he has on
He can't argue with everyone on the show. He has to be able to listen to every opinion without being distracting even if he disagrees with it.
aww does baby want his rhetoric to be pre-packaged and easy to follow?
@@msg2743 I am a she not a he. You may be confused but I'm good. I feel good today. I triggered a he/she
@MIKE HUNT Your channel name Jajaja only someone sporting that level of stupidity would be a Joe fan.
First gun I owned was an XD 40. I didn’t think it was “too much caliber”. But more to the point. I’m not surprised, but never thought of it, that NRA members don’t commit “evil acts” with guns. Who is this dude? More articulate than I am on this subject. Want to hear more of him.
joshua hand Colin Noir is his name I think???
yea he has a channel on youtube as well
ReGo001 I didn’t say “any crimes”. I said evil acts with guns referring to what Joe said regarding mass shootings. Fuck outta here.
Here is a link to his videos on gun reviews he does to get a feel. His articulation pretty much translate through every video... Great stuff and great editing.
czcams.com/video/gto2DCm6Lx4/video.html
He has many great videos on CZcams. He speaks very well because he is a lawyer as well as a gun rights activist.
This dude is awesome, I had no idea he was only introduced to firearms after adulthood, good to see even one person see the other side of the 2A community
That was one of the best clips ever on the subject of guns and the NRA
The entire 2hr post cast is great
Not really. Rogan tries to shove a stupid argument "no member of the NRA has ever done X". Well sure, the NRA has a lot of good responsible shooters. It's one of the things they teach. But the fearmongering they spew is very much in the American popular consciousness and foments violent rhetoric.
I suggest you look up the Mulford Act. If you do, you'll understand the hypocrisy of your comment
When in the hell are we going to start talking criminal control
Colion Noir in the house!!! So happy to see him on your channel!
For once I am in agreement with the gun conversation, it just makes sense. Thank Colion, you have gained another subscriber
,(fellow NRA member!)
lol NRA member finally agrees with the gun conversation?
What I hate is how often anti gunners bring up the NRA... I think most gun owners don’t “support” the NRA
In fact I find more people who think the NRA hurts gun rights more than it supports gun rights
Has he talked about the youtube headquarters getting shot up yet? I'd love to get Joes take on why the media didn't cover it much. Could be because a female, vegan, Muslim, woman done it in a gun free zone in one of the strictest gun law states. If the focus wasn't on the tool and more on the people and a way to prevent these atrocities, things might actually change.
Tripper Does Or cause, wait how many people died?
When did this happen?!
Ever notice how your conspiracy theories exactly fit your world view?
Holy shit I actually forgot about that
Damn, I almost forgot about that.
It is pretty weird how that was shortly covered if it was even covered at all....
Wow, really impressed with Colion, he has articulated a very difficult subject so well. Good job!!!!!
the NRA is not pro gun enought (im not joking)
Unfortunately the GOA doesn't have the voice and the pull of the NRA in the political sphere. GOA needs to become more mainstream so we can retire the NRA.
LOL
Hey loren.
BOB honestly no company will support a group that is 100% against regulation. It’s a bad business move and I’m sorry but the majority of people and gun owners don’t feel the way you do.
Very true if they don't go against big gov thugs who shoot card carrying gun owners then they defeat their own purpose.
As an NRA life member.
I would not suggest joining.
I cannot get any help with anything that has to do with a gun.
Every time I go online for the NRA there is nowhere to log in.
But it will ask you if you want to become a member.
I have been buying guns for a while now. Just went in to buy another one. I got a DENY from the FBI.
As a lifetime member they have no idea how to help me.
What are they good for??? There is no way to ask them questions, and if you do have a question about guns.
They do not know the answer.
Do not join the NRA.
Thank you for explaining your experience with the NRA. What are your thoughts on GOA? Any advice will be greatly appreciated.
Take Care & Stay Vigilant ⚔️
Yea guns are good and all, but I was hoping this clip would actually go into details about the NRA lol.
Noir is awesome man..so happy he got on Rogans podcast
Most people today will not realize how important the second amendment is until we’re in a situation where we all need them in our hands and don’t have them.
Brent Taylor if "that" time comes your guns aren't doing shit.
Really Bob, history would say otherwise. Look at Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan. All wars where U.S. troops with all their air superiority and tanks etc struggled to fight off the local insurgents. We the people, if it came to "that" would fair just fine.
Vietnam deaths: ALLIED (47 000); NVA/VC (444 000) CIVILIANS (627 000) Your definition of fine is different to mine. This, also in a time where killing is nowhere near as efficient as it is now. There are arguments for guns (not many), but keeping you safe from governments is not one of them.
I really, really would like to know what situation that might be. Because frankly, I've no idea what the fuck y'all are thinking. What situation might occur where you need to have guns? Not just hunting rifles or shotguns, but assault rifles? And don't give me any bullshit about "assault rifle isn't a thing." I'm an Army veteran. I know what an assault rifle is. I know what they're designed to do and I know in detail how they differ from hunting rifles. So stow that nonsense and tell me exactly when you think Americans will need to have military weaponry.
Bob If that’s true it won’t matter either way but that’s not the point at all
Damn that brother just spoke more truth than anyone I've heard in a long time ... white, hispanic, black american period. Truth does & always should transcend race & social status. 💯 agree with him.
Murica.. Pew Pew
you mean pow pow ;)
we don't really do pew.
We do phew, though. As in when we took out Afghanistan, and Iraq, Pakistan and Iran said "phew"... :)
Lol...
Proxxiy you know fuck all.
Lots of guns here in KY and no school shootings. Fucking idiot.
The CULTURE changed and stopped embracing Americanism. Became more like socialists in urban areas. And socialists and anarchists are killers.
Now, piss off dunce.
pew pew pewdiepie
@@Varama Shootings have been going down since the 1990s yet there are more guns than ever. Oh do you mean someone could get an illegal gun. Crazy how crazy people do crazy things but hey like less than one percent of the population commit crimes yet we all are fucked up. Use your brain next time you post.
The right to self defense is deeper than a human right. It's an animal right. The 2nd amendment acknowledges your animal right to defend yourself as vigerously as you can muster.
jackhandy00 NO. The 2nd amendment guarantees the citizen the right to overthrow our elected government. It's to keep the government in check. To fight against tyrannical governments. To remind the government who is really in power (citizens)
But what is actually happening? We are killing each other at the rate of ten's of thousands every year.
Marius Dicpetris ????? I hope you don't mean we are killing each other with gun by tens of thousands each year.... That simply isn't true. Cite your source... Don't perpetuate falsehoods to match your agenda. Car kill more people every year than guns do. Obesity kills more people every year than firearms do. Should we ban cars and fat people?...
There's no such thing as an "animal right". Animals have no concept of rights. Lmao. Rights don't actually exist, you know? They're things we've made up but we've agreed to abide by them.
You think people should have the right to defend themselves as vigorously as they can muster. So does that mean you think citizens should be allowed to own rocket launchers? Tanks? Mines? If not,, you already disagree with your own argument.
Shannon Farrell Note though that cars have a ton of regulations and laws attached to them. Note that people need a license to drive a car, and they can have their license taken away. Also note that cars have a cvital purpose in our society and it would cease to function without them.
And banning fat people is a stupid idea to combat obesity. That's a dumb argument because nobody's suggesting banning gun owners. Obesity also doesn't kill anyone but yourself.
Here's a great analogy:
If a carpenter builds you a house, and the house falls down and kills someone, do you blame the hammer? Do you seek to ban hammers?
No.
The *carpenter* gets the blame, _their_ training, _their_ intention, _their_ skills get the scrutiny... No one looks at the hammer and thinks that is the problem.
Hey Joe, first off love the channel and the topics you come to the table with. This is such a good topic and I really hope that all those who follow your channel take the time to listen to it all the way through. We have a lot in common and I've watched your stuff for years through different platforms. Love Steve Rinella, Cam Hanes (I'm a born and raised Oregonian), various MMA channels, and the list can go on. Anyway, your channel reaches so many people including those that oppose everything you say. I'm an NRA member, avid Bowhunter, OHA, RMEF, and a couple others that give to conservation of animals, and their habitat. Keep doing what you're doing. Love it!
The NRA has sponsored more laws on regulations than any other "gun rights" group. They wrote the background check legislation. The NRA is on the govts side. If you wanna support 2A that would be the GOA. Any restrictions or regulations go directly against the most important words of the amendment. SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!
A Background check is an infringment.
one of those guys guaranteeing the safety of others....including other gun owners, is infringement?
Also part of the Second Amendment: WELL REGULATED.
Also says under a well regulated militia. Btw the amendment was written in a pretty vague sense and with no foresight as to how powerful these weapons would become.
Not if you think the most important words are WELL REGULATED.
Colin Noir awesome gun channel, long time fan!! So cool to see you on Joe’s show, 2 of my long time favs, very very cool💪🇺🇸💪
Explain this: www.gq.com/story/inside-federal-bureau-of-way-too-many-guns
ok this is just more government propaganda, (had a quick look at colins channel)
If you really like guns go watch demolition ranch (my fav) just for one
dpuntaric I'm not entirely sure what you are implying.
I hate when people use the “cars can be weapons too” argument...yes a car, knife, bat, chain saw, etc, etc can be used as a weapon to cause harm, but all those objects are used primarily for other non lethal purposes. A gun has only one purpose and that is to kill or threaten to kill another living thing. That’s why they should be regulated JUST LIKE CARS ARE!!
They ARE regulated! You don't just walk into Bass Proshops, plop down your money and walk out with a firearm! There's a test, background check and in most states a multiday waiting period!!
You get rid of guns like in the UK and China they just replace it with mass stabbings which happens all the time in those countries and elsewhere!
Number 1 cause of murder is hands and feet guns are further down the list and rifles at the bottom..
"Why do you need to take my AR-15?"
Colion Noir.... Thank you......
This dude is legit.
I'm a 11 year Marine vet, a gun owner, an NRA member...and a black male in his 30s. And I condemn the mass shootings, the needless killing of my fellow black men by police and the general discord in this country surrounding firearms. The problem isn't guns, it's people. Same way you wouldn't let someone with extreme mental health issues operate a vehicle...so to shouldn't they be allowed to operate or own a firearm. We need better tests and failsafea to insure they have no access to them...NOT banning firearms or amending the 2A. I'm a card carrying liberal, but the left are definitely addressing the gun debate in America completely wrong.
Cars aren’t built to kill people though. Cars are for transportation. Guns are specifically made for killing. That point was not the greatest. Also this guest should understand that back in the 1960’s once the panthers started legally exercising the 2nd amendment, most state and the federal government moved very quickly to enact laws that prevented them from doing so. My point being this country and the people are very select at who should own and carry those said weapons.
GOA
Kakarot agreed
Much better than the rights hating NRA that has lobbied for more restrictions than anyone else. *SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED*
GOA The real defenders of our 2nd Amendment right!!!
Gun Owners of America >>>>>>>>>> NRA.
I love Colion a lot & he's a great guy.....but GOA is actually fighting for preserving & RESTORING all of our 2A rights, unlike the NRA. The NRA is only for maintaining the status quo...just like establishment Republicans. This is NOT a helpful strategy for maintaining the 2nd rights of Americans b/c the anti-gun people are going to win sometimes (It's just a reality) and the NRA has decided to just let them have their occasional "wins" in order to not rock the boat. They need to fight for restoring rights. They need to be like GOA.
Joined a couple weeks ago
Holy shit, get Rogan got Noir on. Super impressed with Rogan.
Chill tf out
There is absolutely NO comparison between cars and guns. Guns are ONLY meant for destruction. Period. Whether or not the thing one is destroying had it coming, or not, whether it's an empty bottle, or a deer, or a human being, guns can only destroy. Cars are for the purpose of transportation, regardless of the way people abuse them. You're child isn't going to get his head blown off from touching an idle car the wrong way. Bullshit analogy, Rogan.
This guy talks about his first time shooting like people talk about losing their virginity.
So glad joe got colion on his show
I think all pencils should be banned. Not just because you could injure someone with a pencil, but because you could write mean things about them!
Duck Landes myself being a gun owner I'm for the right to bear arm's. But hearing people say stupid shit like your post. I understand why anti-gun people think most gun owners are dumb loser's.
I thought my comment was "stupid" enough that intelligent people would know it was tongue in cheek. A joke that demonstrates how "stupid" it is to blame a tool rather than the person misusing the tool. I guess it went right over your head. Sorry to have triggered you with my joke.
Because apparently words are violence these days.
And other dude...work on your irony detection.
Doom Penguin A kid in my 8th grade class stabbed another kid through the throat with a bic pen, and I personally got stabbed in the shoulder with a pencil.
Never been shot. Therefor pencils are more dangerous than guns by my experience.
Though my original comment was said tongue in cheek, there is a ring of truth behind it. More than 1000 school children, in California alone, are seriously injured each year by "school supplies" (pens and pencils) in school yard brawls. In the U.S. there are more than 230 pencil related deaths a year.
Comparing guns to cars is actually so dumb
My first gun was a DD44 Dostovei, and then I traded it in for an RC-P90, but it's illegal because it's fully automatic and fires 80 rounds at a time. I'd shot a Klobb before, but it was weak. I also have a Cougar Magnum and a D5K Deutsche.
The day I legally bought my own firearms was one of the greatest days of my life I truly felt I was an American.
- I am a staunch advocate of private gun ownership I believe in the right to Home self defense and sport shooting.
God Bless
NRA
If an object you simply purchased makes you feel any more or less belonging to a society, you're a moron. Same goes for the idiots that care about flags and rituals but not their fellow Americans.
Raul- What does me owning a firearm have to do with anyone else, I’m not a criminal and why should I be punished for the actions of one person, that’s the question that no one can ever answer, and come on you think the European governments care about their people, what about Australia’s or Canada’s, they are intentionally flooding their countries with the shittiest possible people you could find.
I wouldn't expect a mere subject of his government to get it, Raul, this is something only a citizen understands.
Paul Martinez same here buddy Charlton Heston is my President!!!
Congrats Raul, you drew out all the crazies.
I'll join the NRA when they apologize for the NFA, until then JPFO or GOA all the way.
I don’t “ NEED “ a Firearm, it’s my Right to bear one.
Why do you “ NEED “ a Supercar that goes over 200 MPH?
Let him get into an incident with a firearm and ask the NRA for help and see what happens. Crickets
The people hating on this video are still trying to pull condoms out of their mouth.
and afraid of guns
He said it at the end. It’s not a privilege it’s a naturally inherent right. I love that! Man, if we could all grasp that depth of knowledge.
@David G. Get your head out of Hillary and bills ass
"The gun dancing in my hand." Jesus christ lol.
Their our God given RIGHTS.. not our “needs” or “wants”.
💯
The right for what? Self defence? If so, then why have 18 of them?
Joe, make a video on how Germany is struggling with the millions of refugees both culturally and demographically.
German here.. we dont struggle with them anymore. Most of them are back in their country. Your welcome
Blame Angela Merkel
Mahuri Holmes Then why does the Muslim population in Germany keep rising...?
www.pewforum.org/2017/11/29/europes-growing-muslim-population/
What BS about refugees lol
Mahuri Holmes you are serious are just trying to make it seam as if Germany didn’t make a huge mistake
Great conversation! Every human being does have the right to defend their life, liberty and that of their loved ones. No amendment necessary, but it is there to that end.
Driving cars is a bad analogy just because cars utility is so woven into everyday society that we cannot get rid of them. Guns are not. You can easily go through your life without a gun, it's a challenge to go through life without a car. I'm not saying anything on gun control, I'm only saying that the analogy is not a great comparison.
I wish there was another national firearms association I could join besides the NRA. Because I’m a gun owner and the NRA which refuses to support or endorse what I would consider reasonable gun control measures does not line up with so many of the beliefs in this country that most gun owners hold. There are WAY more than 5 million gun owners in the USA and yet the NRA only has 5 million numbers. What does this tell you?
Joe acts like he knows all about guns but says a sub compact 40 caliber pistol is a “big effing gun.” Ooooook Joe.
Great gun but too snappy for me
I would say a 40 is big for someone who has never shot a gun before and was afraid of them at the time
Lol I was thinking the same thing
I wouldn't say it's big but it's pretty God damn powerful lmao.
Pretty sure he meant the caliber of the gun. For a first time shooter a 40 caliber, especially in a physically small gun is a “big gun”.
That's was a beautiful explanation of our 2nd amendment
I'm a lifelong NRA member, and Most people that know me don't even know I own guns.......We are not obsessed people.
In a free country, there is no requirement to show a NEED to exercise a RIGHT.
*Hey Colion*
Let’s meet in Dallas. We can drift my G35, shoot my HK 91, and talk about God given freedoms. Just promise not to steal my fiancé
slide a g35? hope that things got some kick!
Joe 'Gun Rights Activist' Rogan
Joe 'down for whatever' Rogan
Joe 'way more thoughtful and intelligent than Anthony Johnston' Rogan.
Anthony Johnston and?
Anthony Johnston yep
He interviews people of great intellect across the board. Liberals and conservatives alike.
No your right to a firearm is not a natural given human right, it's a right you have as an American, some other coutnries would grant you that right too, this guy is just wrong.
That the NRA was started by veterans of the Civil War doesn't surprise people, that it was started by UNION/Yankee vets really annoys the Guns 'n' Confederate Flags crowd.
Great conversation by two level headed guys. Keep up the good work both of you!
Amen, not a privilege, but a god given right.
God given?? Don’t think so pal.
It's a privilege to live in the US, where it is a right.
@Bro Spec People die everyday. You've just chosen to hone your focus on gun violence. If the US was how you claim it to be, people wouldn't be clamoring from all over to get here.
it's a privilege
Cars have more use than guns. That's why we don't ban cars, but we have laws that suppress cars, we have speed limits, seat belts, we make the roads with curves so cars can go faster around them. We don't have much for guns.
"The First amendment is first for a reason. The second amendment is there in case that first one don't work out..."-Dave Chappelle
There is no good argument for having guns
You’ve never taken a history class have you.
I love y’all! 🇺🇸 Sending everyone a Texas size hug and I hope everyone has a safe week.
🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Do you have a right to have a grenade? Or a tank? Or chemical weapons? We obviously draw the line somewhere. The argument is about where that line should lay.
The line was set in historical context... millitia should be armed as your typical infantry man.. with a rifle and maybe pistol...
He was doing gun videos loooong before he met the NRA.
I don't think there's anything wrong with making sure someone who owns a gun understands the responsibilities of gun ownership.
You have a right to own a gun. But the tipe of gun you own can and should be regulated
Hey Joe, I love your interviews, and your honest content. You are a necessity in this current age. Please, please, please don’t stop! Please!
Go read a book instead
Who is this dude? I'd like to learn more about the man. Seems like a pretty smart guy.
Joe Rogan changing his opinions is because he is a rational human being open to the idea that he is wrong see you should consider that.
Why do gun advocates not want background checks before getting a gun?
I'm quite sure that it's required to go through a background check.
@@marlinmurrell620 the NRA and many politicians are opposed to passing legislation on universal background checks. They’ll oppose waiting periods, they will oppose anything that might decrease the number of guns being sold in any way.
@@vhufeosqap there's already universal background checks. The States with the most strict gun laws have the most gun violence also.
He makes a perfect argument for anyone to be able to own a fully functioning tank, or nuclear weapon. Fine, it is a right. You accept the consequences. America is truly unique.
tank is pretty dope though.
I respectfully disagree- I think when one asks a question like “do you need an AR15”; they’re not questioning your second amendment right, because that’s inalienable. They’re questioning whether you are extending beyond the limits that our forefathers imagined. When they drafted the first amendment, they certainly wouldn’t think to allow all speech. The same applies to every single other amendment. It’s about reasonable restrictions. It’s what John Locke wrote about; giving up a portion of your rights (not your rights in entirety) for the welfare of all people under that government.
There are laws and restrictions on guns and what you can do with them.
rascalMatt17 I am a natural born US citizen. I took AP Government. I think I know what the first amendment says. By instituting things like stricter background checks, your rights aren’t being infringed upon; instead they are checked by the government to ensure that you are acting in a lawful manner.
You are an idiot, don't speak for the founding fathers about the 2nd amendment unless you educate yourself in their intent. You have no idea what you are talking about
I've introduced quite a few people to shooting guns for the first time, and ALL of them are amazed by the power, and LOVE how fun it is to shoot a gun safely. Teaching those people the essentials of gun safety is also very important, which is what I do right off the bat.
When the 2nd was written, the colonies had been constantly harassed by British soldiers who, among other things, confiscated weapons they thought could be used against them. Therefore, it was written to say that a state (a political entity) would not be free unless its citizens could organize a response to an enemy. The main idea is that taking someone's guns away needed to be criminalized to make oppressing us unattractive. Now, at that time we didn't have the layers of law enforcement and national defense that we now have but the 2nd is written with no stipulations and is therefore enshrined as a basic right of the US citizen.