It's incredible how the ERS/Battery is rarely mentioned even in technically proficient channels. The difference is day and night, and so often what they call "skill" is just that one car is fully charged and the other is depleted. Without knowing the electric usage we are really comparing apples and oranges.
@@jaguatiricaimediata5305 well, it does take skill to strategically save and deploy the electric energy to make a pass happen. That can happen over the course of many laps during a battle for position
Some people don’t take that into account. All they see is “it has bigger number”. Yet ignore Monza where Ferrari was smoking red bull on straight with DRS.
Leclerc went outta slipstream of the haas at 330 kph, max had double slipstream with 338 kph. For me its 8 kph difference maximum. Leclerc then dropping 2 kph on full throttle shows, he was in battery-load-mode. The haas had top sped at braking point with no drs. Means full battery power deployed.Nothing to do with drs. Max was in double slipstream till end of straight, and full energy.
Thank you for this great presentation! It really shows the depth of F1 on a level that is understandable for regular people. Not just the enthusiasts or the actual data engineers at the factory.
@@nastyguy3841 Wache and his whole design team is behind the whole car, Neweys last hands on contribution to the F1 cars was him helping out on the suspension for the RB18(2022).
Yeah we can see that miserable top speed of Ferrari the 2023 Miami gp But maybe it's beacause for me the rear wing of the ferrari was with more downforce
You can't have everything. It's like Stroll crying about his horrible straight speed. Yeah? Because you can't keep the car on the road the engineers have to set up a safer, downforce heavy config to ensure you have more grip on the turns. Verstappen being so able to catch a loose rear wheel, can manage configs where a bit less of downforce is necessary, which helps his straight speed and tyre deg.
So to understand better, let's say that 15km/h is egal to 4meter/second And that a F1 Car is 5.5 meters long, it's a LOT of disadvantages for Leclers here
Pay attention to Max Verstappen Throttle application. It's the smoothest of all, he also is the only one who seems to "correct" it at the top end, removing ever so slightly a bit of throttle and then reapplying it. As if he felt something more about the traction than the others and adjusted it. 0:30
He seems to bottom quite a lot as well Leclerc, especially on the pit straight. That may also explain the lower straight line speed in addition of the DRS inefficiency.
New beautiful livery, new race suits and helmets...this Miami weekend is gonna be so exciting. Can't wait to see the car on track! 🙌 Let´s go guys! And Fred cooking behind the scenes! 😎💪 ❤🇮🇹 Forza C² ❤❤💪🏽💪🏽 💚🤍❤ Forza Ferrari! 💚🤍❤
Leclerc pulled out of the slipstream at 330 kph while Verstappen was still in a double slipstream. Verstappen also had a much better exit out of the last corner than Magnussen and once again a double slipstream with Magnussen pulling out of the slipstream first.
If Ferrari do nab up Newey from RB now that its confirmed that he will leave at early 2025 season , they have a chance of a good car from 2026 onwards I reckon.
I don't think it is that easy to say, XX kph advantage due to DRS. Well, of course, it is quite clear that Redbull had DRS advantage over the other teams at that time. But here, Max had more slipstream, and also, the tire condition might be different. Good tires can help to reach higher speeds at limited distances, as better grip and less tire slip will allow quicker acceleration.
Ferrari has the most powerful engine everyone confirmed and yo say that ferrari's top speed is bad go see las Vegas sainz hitting 366 km/h. In this case leclerc has much more downfirce on the rear wing to assure that he doesnt crash it again but verstappen has a better control of his car and he needs less downforce which helps him in the straights. And he has double slipstream so you cant compare them
leclerc doesn’t have more downforce to avoid crashing it is to save tyres get your facts right and to be honest it is sainz who has crashed more than leclerc
@@mo215300 I didn't mean it in an offensive way like both Charles and carlos. But they said that after leclerc crashed it in qualifying and was talking about stability issues. It was for both better car handling and tyres saving
They should ban DRS for 2025 as a test so that Red bull advantage goes away and teams like McLaren and Mercedes can be competitive. They were willing to invest all there resources for 2021 regulation to stop Mercedes they should do the same
And then you'll get even worse procession like the one when Alonso couldn't pass Petrov. But yeah, let's ban DRS to forcefully cripple Red Bull like how F1 changed tyre rule back in 2005 solely to cripple Ferrari. Ridiculous.
I can't believe 55 years old would pick their words the way you did but, yeah, perhaps there are children trapped inside a 55 years old body, after all. Pardon me.
In 2025 we will see Verstappen's true pace after he no longer has the best car, do you'll think he will fail or show he doesn't need the fastest car to win?
It wasn’t just the DRS, it was the Slipstream + DRS + Plus Full ERS
It's incredible how the ERS/Battery is rarely mentioned even in technically proficient channels. The difference is day and night, and so often what they call "skill" is just that one car is fully charged and the other is depleted. Without knowing the electric usage we are really comparing apples and oranges.
Yk i actually learned how the ERS boosts you like DRS because of the F1 games XD
@@jaguatiricaimediata5305 well, it does take skill to strategically save and deploy the electric energy to make a pass happen. That can happen over the course of many laps during a battle for position
2:07 Leclerc in "Zonta simulator"
That is kinda similar lol
Ah yes, Michael Magnussen vs Mika Verstappen
Kevin taking Turn 1 ahead of Charles.
The engineer: MAGNUSSEN DRS BEHIND
There has always been a 5 seconds or so lag for all the TRs
@@martinzhang5533 I know that, but I think it's funny anyway.
Also take into account that Max had double slipstream on both occasions, which adds to the top speed.
Yeah but Leclerc was a lot closer to magnussen in the first straight
Some people don’t take that into account. All they see is “it has bigger number”. Yet ignore Monza where Ferrari was smoking red bull on straight with DRS.
@@Alp577 And you obviously didn't take setups into account as well
@@Alp577Redbull had more wing to persevere tyres which is why max could just wait till Carlos locked up
Leclerc went outta slipstream of the haas at 330 kph, max had double slipstream with 338 kph. For me its 8 kph difference maximum. Leclerc then dropping 2 kph on full throttle shows, he was in battery-load-mode. The haas had top sped at braking point with no drs. Means full battery power deployed.Nothing to do with drs. Max was in double slipstream till end of straight, and full energy.
Did you watched the Hass onboard during this stint?
The Max and The Kevin. LoL
Thank you for this great presentation! It really shows the depth of F1 on a level that is understandable for regular people. Not just the enthusiasts or the actual data engineers at the factory.
2:00 nice "The Michael" reference yelistener
I was wondering why he was using wrong grammar now it makes sense 😂
Maybe Max doing battery dump with double slip stream and DRS. All very powerful
Will Adrian Newey fix that in 2026 Ferrari?
Wache is behind Redbull's DRS, not Newey
@@nastyguy3841 Wache and his whole design team is behind the whole car, Neweys last hands on contribution to the F1 cars was him helping out on the suspension for the RB18(2022).
He would more likely go to Aston Martin, where he already has a lot of ties (the Valkyrie itself). IF he leaves Red Bull.
So that Leclerc can bin the car faster? 😂
@@jaguatiricaimediata5305 It's official he's going to leave red bull in 2025
Williams: My Max Speed is the biggest in the straight
Haas: Nah
Yeah we can see that miserable top speed of Ferrari the 2023 Miami gp
But maybe it's beacause for me the rear wing of the ferrari was with more downforce
maybe they need to change rear wing for leclerc cause that spin in qualy
@@rizkasyaukany8891 i thought he spin because he is too deep in the kerb ?
You can't have everything. It's like Stroll crying about his horrible straight speed. Yeah? Because you can't keep the car on the road the engineers have to set up a safer, downforce heavy config to ensure you have more grip on the turns. Verstappen being so able to catch a loose rear wheel, can manage configs where a bit less of downforce is necessary, which helps his straight speed and tyre deg.
I like this guy's videos but wonder how he does not get any copyright claims
RB19’s 34kph overtaking excess over SF-23 on the shortest full throttle section is pure madness. Even with DRS
I think AlphamaxNova ruined these videos for me lol, everytime the vid pauses for text I giggle now. Keep it up man, love these breakdowns
So to understand better, let's say that 15km/h is egal to 4meter/second
And that a F1 Car is 5.5 meters long, it's a LOT of disadvantages for Leclers here
Even your typos have typos holy shit
Red Bull drs in 2023 was super powerful that they had unbelievable straight line speed
the start is like old ps4 splitscreen minecraft it brings back nostalgia.
Was the big DRS-difference between RB en FER not also partly the result of the double slipstream Max had?
New to F1 - why did Magnussen not use DRS when both Lec and Verstappen could?
Have to be within 1 second of a car in front at detection point. Since Magnussen was lead car of the three he gets no drs.
@@de1623 Thank you!
@@chiroyce You're welcome 🙂
Pay attention to Max Verstappen Throttle application. It's the smoothest of all, he also is the only one who seems to "correct" it at the top end, removing ever so slightly a bit of throttle and then reapplying it. As if he felt something more about the traction than the others and adjusted it. 0:30
I think the Ferrari engine was running a detuned setup as it never reached 12k rpm like the Honda PU
He seems to bottom quite a lot as well Leclerc, especially on the pit straight. That may also explain the lower straight line speed in addition of the DRS inefficiency.
Nice
1:57 lmao
New beautiful livery, new race suits and helmets...this Miami weekend is gonna be so exciting. Can't wait to see the car on track! 🙌 Let´s go guys! And Fred cooking behind the scenes! 😎💪 ❤🇮🇹 Forza C² ❤❤💪🏽💪🏽 💚🤍❤ Forza Ferrari! 💚🤍❤
Red bull'sエンジン音がジェット機に近いですね。
飛んじゃう感じ。
when Leclerc became Zonta😂
Ferrari later fixed it, that is why they did good in Spa, Monza and Vegas
Leclerc pulled out of the slipstream at 330 kph while Verstappen was still in a double slipstream. Verstappen also had a much better exit out of the last corner than Magnussen and once again a double slipstream with Magnussen pulling out of the slipstream first.
Max had a double tow. Charles had more front-wing drag.
I think it's because 2x slipstream Hass+ferrari
If Ferrari do nab up Newey from RB now that its confirmed that he will leave at early 2025 season , they have a chance of a good car from 2026 onwards I reckon.
I don't think it is that easy to say, XX kph advantage due to DRS. Well, of course, it is quite clear that Redbull had DRS advantage over the other teams at that time. But here, Max had more slipstream, and also, the tire condition might be different. Good tires can help to reach higher speeds at limited distances, as better grip and less tire slip will allow quicker acceleration.
Silly video comparison. comparing apples to oranges as people noted. show us the difference in drs based on their quali laps.
Now you can he how powerful Haas engine is over Ferrari's.
Haas uses Ferrari engines....🤣
I wonder how in the world can DRS be so different between teams?
Depends how DRS effecient, Downforce set up and draggy the car is so most prob Ferrari was just slow in that aspects
@@Yekky72637 most broken English I’ve ever read😭
@@durodesduvo8424
- demands an explanation
-gets one
-complains about english
@@Heisenberg0030 kid, if you can decyfer that comment then color me impressed.
P7 is miserable? I think Sargent and DeVries would like to have a word with you
the ferrari was way better than the williams and alpha tauri.
Ferrari still gonna run the same wing since bahrain
You know, I think F1 is kinda primitive in terms technology, like they can really go all out with the cars but are limited somehow
noone believe that haas is slightly ahead of mercedes that year
ofc... cuz they were not? Hass finished P10 in constructors, Merc P2
@@Yekky72637 i mean the car , it was meant for praising hamilton and russel , they were doing a great job
Ferrari has the most powerful engine everyone confirmed and yo say that ferrari's top speed is bad go see las Vegas sainz hitting 366 km/h. In this case leclerc has much more downfirce on the rear wing to assure that he doesnt crash it again but verstappen has a better control of his car and he needs less downforce which helps him in the straights. And he has double slipstream so you cant compare them
leclerc doesn’t have more downforce to avoid crashing it is to save tyres get your facts right and to be honest it is sainz who has crashed more than leclerc
@@mo215300 I didn't mean it in an offensive way like both Charles and carlos. But they said that after leclerc crashed it in qualifying and was talking about stability issues. It was for both better car handling and tyres saving
@@F1reMaster__EditZzparc ferme rules mate, u can’t change the rear wing
@@mikasr.5 unless there is a lot of damage
@@F1reMaster__EditZz no, the scrutineers will make sure that the car is rebuilt to the exact same set up
Yooo first
to suffer secondhand embarassment
@@Jejking idk why lol it didn't send this it waited 1 min but my sec comment ( 1 min ) is the first comment
and I doubt it will be a much better perf for Ferrari again this year in MIAMI...Max & REDBULL will pulverise FERRARI again;)C
1 min
🤡 milton
Leclrec is just slow
😂😂😂
Member when Hamilton had a car 20+ km\h faster on straights with no slipstream? I member
When? except 2014-16 era in which they had 80hp plus more than any other car
member
nascar is better
They should ban DRS for 2025 as a test so that Red bull advantage goes away and teams like McLaren and Mercedes can be competitive.
They were willing to invest all there resources for 2021 regulation to stop Mercedes they should do the same
lol not having DRS would just make it even easier for Max to gap the field. It would also make the races incredibly boring
"Our car is very slow.I gave it everything"
- Sir Lewis 🏳️🌈(2014-2021)
And then you'll get even worse procession like the one when Alonso couldn't pass Petrov.
But yeah, let's ban DRS to forcefully cripple Red Bull like how F1 changed tyre rule back in 2005 solely to cripple Ferrari.
Ridiculous.
@@ananthu8534 bro its all right but why add the gay flag? LOL
Max had double slipstream, dumb@ss.
wow calm down there DTS fan. Theres plenty of examples showcasing the strong DRS of the RB through the whole of 2023
@@oransjball DTS my @55. Ive been watching F1 since 2004, kiddo. I know the RB straightline speed is ridiculous, this was a bad example to showcase.
dont be a clown, there is no such thing as double slipstream. slipstream is slipstream is slipstream. think before u type.
I can't believe 55 years old would pick their words the way you did but, yeah, perhaps there are children trapped inside a 55 years old body, after all.
Pardon me.
Pipe it down you fucking clown
In 2025 we will see Verstappen's true pace after he no longer has the best car, do you'll think he will fail or show he doesn't need the fastest car to win?