KIA EV6 vs Volvo C40 Electric - Crash Test
Vložit
- čas přidán 24. 05. 2022
- Today, Euro NCAP publishes its third round of safety results for 2022. The KIA EV6 and the Mercedes C-Class, both large family cars, are awarded the top five-star rating. Volvo’s C40 Recharge also gets the full five stars as does the new Multivan from Volkswagen. Stellantis’ cousins, the Opel/Vauxhall Astra and Peugeot 308, are both rated as four star cars in the small family category.
The sixth generation Opel/Vauxhall Astra and third generation Peugeot 308 are both based on the Stellantis EMP2 platform and, unsurprisingly, score very similarly across all four areas of assessment. Both the offset test and the full-width crash test highlighted marginal chest injury protection for average male and small female drivers, and neither car was equipped with a centre airbag for far-side crash protection, a countermeasure which is increasingly common on modern cars. Both cars offer plenty of crash avoidance technology but do not include some of the latest advancements introduced in the market. The cars’ four-star ratings apply also to their PHEV variants.
All of the five-star cars in this test series demonstrated excellent crash protection, with scores of 90% or more, compared to 76% and 80% for the Stellantis’ cars. This dispels the notion that the difference between 5 stars and 4 stars is always due to ADAS, although that is often also the case. The cars showed consistently good results for child occupant protection as well. The largest differences between the EV6, C-Class, C40 Recharge and Multivan can be found in VRU protection they offer, in particular front-end performance, where the C-Class, fitted with an active bonnet, outperforms the KIA EV6 by a significant margin. On overall assistance technology, the Volvo C40 Recharge came out on top. Despite its somewhat different, boxy shape, the VW Multivan put in a solid all-round result that was on a par with the cars tested. - Auta a dopravní prostředky
Clickbate thumbnail BS, just showing both cars NCAP tests.
when the car hit a child get more score than didn't hit ... hahaha
Biased paid Volvo back handers hahaha
LOL? Kia didn't hit anything gets 64% on AEB Pedestrian while Volvo crashes with a child right in the middle and still gets 70% wow.
Europe car social credit +50
Because you get points when hitting people like in video game 😂. I bet there is an explanation for that situation, it doesn't make any sense all Volvos use the same safety technology and I haven't seen before a failure like this.
in this note is also the total pedestrian safety considered, including the head or leg impact injury, etc. In short, not only does an impact have to be prohibited (with the help of the respective sensors, radar, cameras ...), but in case of an impact, the measures must have been taken to reduce the induced injury, like designing an energy absorbant bumper or utilization of materials to fulfill the requirements. in the respective tests, the transferred energy is measured using the tools you saw in the video.
Those figures are on the basis of several trials and checks. Whereas the video is to give you a glimpse of those tests. Had it not hit the child in that moment that score would have been 85 instead of 70
GTA5 lol
6:39 And volvo still gets a higher score?
Are you kidding me? 🧐
I was about to make the same comment 🤔
thats leak content 🤣
in this note is also the total pedestrian safety considered, including the head or leg impact injury, etc. In short, not only does an impact have to be prohibited (with the help of the respective sensors, radar, cameras ...), but in case of an impact, the measures must have been taken to reduce the induced injury, like designing an energy absorbant bumper or utilization of materials to fulfill the requirements. in the respective tests, the transferred energy is measured using the tools you saw in the video.
Overpopulation solved
i'm sure it's the child's failure, not Volvo🤣 and probably Volvo's hits are more safe than Kia's without hit🤣
뭔가 시험 점수에서 의구심이드네요.
어린이를 친 볼보가 사람을 다 피한 기아보다 점수가 더 많이 나오다니..
유럽 브랜드 점수가 있는듯...ㅋㅋ
Volvo - даже если вы не хотите ездить на volvo она всё равно найдёт вас и заставит прокатиться, хотя бы на капоте
테스트 기준의 설정에 대한 포인트라 점수에 의심은 없습니다.
다만 모든 안전테스트는 절대적이라고 하지는 않고 참고 사항이라고 합니다.
참조만 하시고 판단은 주관적으로 하시는게
흉기차잖냐
@박춘배 니프사니얼굴
볼보는 아이 치고도 다 피한 기아보다 점수 높네ㅋㅋㅋ
걍 유럽에서 자국 자동차 기업 밀어주는거임. 옛날부터 유럽 보이지않는 무역장벽은 유명함. 환경규제도 그래서 만든거임
@@dog_pepe.25어느나라든 자국 브랜드 밀어주는건 맞는데 볼보는 중국자동차 회사임
지리자동차에 합병됬음
지리자동차 고급브랜드가 볼보
They should show the kid flying. Would encourage engineers to improve the safety features. 😁😁😁
So to get better score, the car needs to hit a pedestrian? Or it just 'must be' EU manufacturer? I'm confused.
The Volvo C40 was designed and is produced in China, so your argument isn't even one.
@@PG-3462 But it is an European brand and this is what people know and care about. So, he is definitely right.
@@bledakaan It is now a Chinese brand, as Volvo is owned by Geely. Most Volvo models are still designed and produced by Volvo in Sweden, but the C40 is an exception.
@@PG-3462 İt is not a Chinese brand, it is a Chinese company. There is a huge difference. Do you think that even one person would recognize Volvo as Chinese ? Everybody would say that it is Swedish.
@@bledakaan Ok? It doesn't change the fact that the C40 is based from the Link & Co 05. Your personal opinion about Volvo doesn't change this.
Great to see, a kill still gives you most XP
What! There's airbags in-between the seats now! How'd I miss that 🙂
Polestar 2 :)
@@saladien9987 Isn't Polestar a subsidiary of Volvo?
@@vincentwendt720 Only 25% the rest is Geely (they own Volvo) but the parts are 80% Volvo
Kia 💪
HAHAHA
LOL L +RATIO
In my country Kia's safety is horrible
Completely annihilated that kid at 6:39 why couldn't you show it!
You can see that they were just flooring it into that kid. Want even a test at that point, more of a homicide.
too bloody
And volvo still gets a higher score lol
It was a bad kid , he didn't checked before crossing 😂
every think it hit the kid..but it didn't. if kid was hit the should be thrown away..
When a bicycle is more important than a child. 😂
Kia good
Where is that THUMBNAIL test?
Kia best 👌
Volvo's auditory warning is unacceptable, you may as well not even bother if your going to wait that late before letting the driver know there is an obstacle
They should test when 120mph coz almost all accidents fatal the car is driven at high speed
볼보는 아이 치었는데????
Wish this was as tough a test as the US NHTSA
It’s actually tougher
Only 64% in Vulnerable Road Users? Why
Looks pretty good to me
기아는 보행자 안전성 다통과해도 64프로, 볼보는 애를 깔아뭉갰는데 70프로 엌ㅋㅋㅋㅋ
민식이 놀이하는 잼민이 킬옵션이라네요
@@pilee2544 그럼 인정이지
백인 프리미엄 ㅋㅋㅋ
@@kgb8h5 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
@@pilee2544 저 애가 중국인이면 ㅇㅈ이지
Clickbait ! There’s a normal EuroNcap crush test but not between the cars as you show as in a image !
Kia no1
Kia best
볼보는 무단횡단 킬 옵션 장착해서 점수가 더 높은거냐?
6:39 6:39 6:39 6:39 6:39
volvo... for life. love my c40. fast. functional. typical swedish classy look
Wow, all these EVs being crash tested and none are blowing up 😮
Different from tesla
Layers no crash test between this 2 cars like in foto.
I always get quite sick when I see brand new cars being wrecked like this
I get quite sick when I see irresponsible pedestrians walk in front of cars like that
I mean, how else are we supposed to judge and improve safety?
@@skyristhefox oh ye I totally agree to the manufacturer’s it’s nothing but to a lot people these cars are unobtainable price wise
This test should have included main battery fire while car is still on instead of pulling manually.
6:39 70%?????? why?
KIA👍
전기차는 충돌 테스트 할때 화재는 안나는가..? 그게 궁금했는데..
메인스위치 끄고 할걸요? 시험공간애서 화재가 빌생하면 진화가 어려우니 내연차 전기차 할거없이 화재요인은 전부 없앤후 시험할듯요
@@user-xk2yc9rc9l 다 실제상황 그대로 테스트 합니다. 설계 시에도 충돌 시 화재가 안나게 하도록 합니다
중국 전기차중 테스트 뒤에 불이 난 차가 꽤 있어요
배터리에 못을 박아도 화재가 안나더군요..
추돌 테스트에선 불 안납니다. 그렇게 설계했거든요. 불나는 차들은 100km/h 정도의 속도로 때려박은 사례가 많습니다. 이 속도로 충돌은 가솔린 전기 할 것 없이 사망을 의미하는거라 현재 기술력으론 어쩔 수 없습니다. 애초에 추돌 테스트들이 시속 60km까지 있는 이유가 이 이상 속도로 사고나면 걍 휴지조각 되거든요. 실제 고속도로 사고에선 여러가지 이유로 감속이 일어나고 충돌하기 때문에 생존자들이 많은 것이구요.
실제로 한국에서 화재가 났다고 하는 아이오닉도 순간 화재발생 후 바로 꺼졌습니다 배터리에서의 화재 문제가 아니었어요
1 kid died in this video
The hit reduced the score of that test but in other similar tests it did overall better and so an overall better score. The Kia also hit the bicycle, and that with less as convincing performances in each specific pedestrian test gave it a lower overall pedestrian safety score. Had the Volvo not hit the doll the overall score would've been significantly higher than 70%. So would the Kia's score if hadn't hit the bicycle.
That's what I believe anyway.
So hitting a bicycle is more serious than hitting a child? Wtf are Europeans thinking? 😂
The Kia did not hit the bicycle. Check again. It only pulled on the tracks on the ground with it's braking tires, due to friction, but it did not hit the bicycle at all.
I have checked again and the Kia didn't hit the bicycle, it ran over a plastic strap behind the bicycle.
People in denial will see things that don't exist and convince themselves that hitting a bike is more serious than running over a kid...someone needs to give you a good slap in the face to shake you out of your delusion.
I (obviously) own a Volvo XC40 (not the C40 but they're basically the same car, just the C40 is slightly heavier) and I was driving down a road where a child popped out exactly like the test dummy did. Mind you this is essentially a main-street/very busy road with a posted speed-limit of 45 MPH (admittedly I was going 48), and my Volvo came to a near complete stop and avoided hitting the child. When I tell you I was sacred sh*tless from how close I came to hitting that little boy, but thankfully my Volvo did it's job. Coincidentally enough this was like 3-4 weeks ago too (haha). Anyways yea IDK what happened in their test but my car does it perfectly fine (Ik there are many factors, mainly the C40 is a heavier vehicle and what not)!
The score is saying... "Volvo is EUROPEAN brand"
지금 럭셔리들은 모두 비슷한 수준. 옛날에는 불보 였겠지만.
볼보가 안전 기준을 끌어올렸음
@@sfg1013 똥 볼보 냄새나
@@sfg1013 실제였으면 아이 뒤졌는데 그것도 끌어올린거임?ㅋㅋ
@@user-BigshortGO 걱정마 흉기차는 급발진이있잖아 시동꺼짐도있고 ㅇㅇ
Overpopulation solved at 6:39, that's why the higher score
KNCAP에서도 국산차 밀어주는거처럼 비슷하다고 봅니다...
사람을 쳐야 점수가 높게 나오나봐요?
Volvo не бил ребенка, а просто хотел погладить хорошего мальчика по голове... опция пока в разработке поэтому как умеет, так и гладит )
Nice clickbait thumbnail, I fell for it
I hope KIA EV9 comes out very soon.
Its a dream car that I really want.
Kia makes horrible cars. I test drove a new KIA Ceed and it was the worst car I've ever tested. After that my appreciation for my old Mercedes E-series at that time grew immensely.
@@dingdong2103 r u srsly look at a whole company just by driving just 1 car...... It's like looking only at Aston Martin Cygnet and say this company is not good
@@limmingjun7930 Yes if their most popular new product was horrible, it speaks volumes of their products in general. Like with Toyota, you don't need to drive many of them to realize that they are just nasty to drive. There's only a couple of exceptions such as Land Cruiser 200 series or Lexus LS :)
@@limmingjun7930 If the KIA EV is truly good, they should do a complete rebrand to get rid off the shame of the recent products...Think of it this way: You test drive the car, like it... But then you think: I'm paying Mercedes price to drive a KIA, is that a good deal? Would you prefer the neighbors see a star on your car at the driveway or a KIA badge? :D
A KIA badge all day, won't want a star badge that holds the reputation of breaking down, stupid repair costs, and overall terrible reliability. KIA all day, mate, can't change my mind.
6:40 poor child
I'm a big Volvo fan but i never expected a Volvo with a 40, especially since it also uses the same CMA platform.
December 1, 2022 10:41PM
i dont know man… there seems to be a little bit of bias towards eu cars.
The Volvo failed the test and hit the child crossing. That's a win for Kia, stupid scores are completely wrong.
The Volvo alert sounds more like a phone call, that's not smart
Kia very very good
Best korea kia motors
외국인들이 보기에 얼마나 웃길까ㅋㅋㅋㅋ
@@Bayerische_Motoren_Werke ㅋㅋㅋㅋ
@@Bayerische_Motoren_Werke 외국인들도 같은생각인데 뭐가 웃겨?
Después de ver estás pruebas
Man competition really does suck compared to tesla
Leave it up to the Europeans to judge a European car better than a non European car even though it was clearly not .
Gotta love the Kia’s windshield cracking built like shit.
KIA FTW
I’m down with Volvo
Super bro..Reported as misinformation for cringe thumbnail..
국뽕은 아니 지만
인정할 부분은 인정 합시다,
대한민국 화이팅 입니다
In India Kia provide paper wrapping engine in name of safety
That’s for Seltos and Sonet. Yes agreed. VW does way better for that price.
wait a minute, the volvo decimated that child. LOL yup 100% safe yup. Edward Cullens save him
請問撞擊時電池的電量多少？撞擊後電池是否會自燃🔥
중국산 배터리가 아닌 한국산이라 불이 안남^^ 중국산 이었다면 불은 당연히 났을텐데 ㅋㅋㅋ
@@Akasaka99 Samsung Galaxy Note 7 was Chinese?
@@rdmz135 ok china
@@rdmz135Yes. Not only Samsung SDI batteries exploded, also Some defective batteries were made in China factory, but Samsung announced that was Samsung's QC problem. So, that's the officially Samsung's fault. However, 17 numbers of flame incidents Hyundai Kona had were all due to the China made defective batteries.
woah! interesting
The EAB doesn't work. I hit a fucking deer with my kia ev6 😭😭😭
Ahhh you guys don't get it ..those are -% that's why Volvo did get more points...
6:40 WTF!!!
Kia body is not for safety service ...while Volvo kills the child ...still Volvo safety features strong also the body is tough, people inside the car's r safe ✌️
World strongest vehicle of Volvo
good
내부로 유리파편이 많이날리네요.
썬팅하면 안날릴듯
한국도 삼성이 겔럭시 휴대폰 발매할 때 까지 wifi zone없었음. 그후? 2년만에 LTE no.1 + free wifi zone 천국 됨
it s not volvo it is colvo
Conclusion: no significant difference. Both very safe. Buy KIA, you probably will get more car for your money. Just a wild guess.
And the Volvo C40 is manufactured in China, so I'd prefer buying the Kia
6:41 thwy just paused the video ..
I'm sure it's the child's failure, not Volvo🤣 and probably Volvo's hits are more safe than Kia's without a hit🤣
Kia very good!
저건 수출용 EV6... 착각하지 말자.
개소리 하고있네
Lazy content didn't even compare both statistic together
We just trust and love to die in FIAT
캬 여기서도 한국인의 국뽕 댓글들을 볼줄이야....
За Корею
수출형이죠?
내수용은 과연???
점수가 높을수록 안좋은거임?
서로 깐다는 줄
볼보 전기차 기술력은 현기한테 안되나보네..ㅋㅋㅋ
Volvo 😍
Kia is better
Volvo 👍👍👍
Click bait!
보행자 안전 64%.. 살인기계인가?
Volvo For Life 👍🏻🇸🇪
3:27,6:56 thank me later
볼보자동차 중국산입니다
중국산이 포장지 지대로 갈아타서 우리나라 드라마나 예능에 오지게 광고하면서 이미지 세탁 오지게 했습니다
S90만 중국에서 생산됨
중국산 살 돈은있고? ㅋ 아직도 이소리 떠들고 다니는 애자가 있다니 기가 막히넼ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
중국에서 인수를 잘하기도 했고, 지리에서 아무 터치 없이 지원을 해주니 최고가 될수밖에요. 스웨덴 볼보의 명성을 더럽히지 않는 중국차입니다.
@@jongminlee5849 근데 중국이 최대주주인것은 변함 없다 왜 경쟁력이 없어서 타국에 팔렸는지 잘 생각 해봐야 함
아 똘추 여기 또 있네ㅋㅋ 현기차 미국에서 만든건 미국차냐?ㅋㅋㅋ 브랜드 기술력은 그대로 가지면서 지리에서 볼보는 노터치다 그냥 볼보는 볼보다
중국 볼보가 설마 안전성테스트에 돈을 썻겠냐? 이런생각을 해보게되는군
Ev6 대한민국에 판매되는 내수용과 수출용이 같은 프레임인지 앞패널 도어패널 안쪽이 궁금하다 확인해볼 필요가 있다 내생각엔 아닐수도 있을것같다
KLICKBAIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
又遇到唬爛片😂
가격차이를 고려하면 안전성의 차이는 미미해 보임.
팩트는 가격차이도 미미하다는거지 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 볼보 대신 기아 선택할 외국인이 있을까?
@@PCH_CZcams 있으니까 팔리겠지?
가격차이 별반 없음
@@user-ek5vv5kh4q 없으니까 유럽 점유율이 개판이겠지?
@@PCH_CZcams 올해 9월까지 유럽 점유율 현대기아그룹 9.9%로 3위에요. 폭스바겐24. 5%, 스텔란티스18.9%, 현대기아 9.9%, 르노9.3%, 토요타7.2%, bmw7.1%, 벤츠5.8% 생각보다 선택 많이 합니다.
ㅋㅋㅋ 이게 공정한 테스트냐?
Tidak masalah walau aman volvo tapi kalau volvo s90 beradu dengan genesis g90 volvo kalah
😂 😂 😂
Volvo: 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍💪💪
Genesis: 👎👎 weak
volvo👎👎
genesis👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
여러분 개어그로입니다.