What does a TUBE sound like?

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 10. 09. 2024
  • Warm... Harmonic Distortion... MOJO.... WHAT?!?
    I WAS WRONG! I had never had the chance to sit down and compare the difference between a tube condenser microphone and a FET version of the same microphone on the same source... in this case while micing an acoustic guitar and an electric guitar amp.
    Download the unprocessed files for yourself. www.recordings...
    Soyuz Launcher - imp.i114863.ne...
    Soyuz 017 - imp.i114863.ne...
    Soyuz 017 TUBE - imp.i114863.ne...
    Soyuz 013 - imp.i114863.ne...
    Soyuz 013 TUBE - imp.i114863.ne...
    Soyuz BOMBLET - imp.i114863.ne...
    (All links are affiliate links)
    Join The Patreon! / recordingstudioloser
    #tubes #recordingstudio #microhpone
    Want to work with me? Mixing, Mastering, Consulting.
    www.recordings...
    Buy my stuff yo. www.recordings...
    Follow me:
    Instagram: / recordingstudioloser
    Facebook: / recordingstudioloser
    All links are affiliate and help support the channel!
    Need a patch bay?
    Small: imp.i114863.ne...
    Large: imp.i114863.ne...
    Need Patchbay cables? imp.i114863.ne...
    My Gear:
    Neve 1084 - imp.i114863.ne...
    Distressor: imp.i114863.ne... Amazon: amzn.to/3aWqJI6
    Neve Bus Compressor: imp.i114863.ne... Amazon amzn.to/3q7UWug
    Weighted Midi Controller imp.i114863.ne... Amazon amzn.to/3d1NGfQ
    BURL MOTHERSHIP: imp.i114863.ne... Amazon amzn.to/34wqXU2
    BURL Less Expensive: imp.i114863.ne... Amazon amzn.to/3jCoi1n
    Burl B2 BOMBER imp.i114863.ne... Amazon amzn.to/3h9ojc2
    Studio Computer: imp.i114863.ne...
    Favorite hard drive: amzn.to/3mGPjAN
    Favorite Microphones!
    UNDERATED Miktek CV4: imp.i114863.ne... Amazon amzn.to/3rf5f0C
    EARTHWORKS DM20: imp.i114863.ne... Amazon amzn.to/38tchpM
    Shure SM57: imp.i114863.ne... Amazon amzn.to/2KIBFQj
    Shure SM7b: imp.i114863.ne... Amazon amzn.to/3pd9EPJ
    AEA R88: imp.i114863.ne... Amazon amzn.to/3pbAAiX
    AEA R44: imp.i114863.ne... Amazon amzn.to/3piiBHL
    My Monitors!
    Focal Twin 6be: imp.i114863.ne... Amazon amzn.to/2WB65a4
    My Sub: imp.i114863.ne... Amazon amzn.to/34xAlqH
    Slate Raven: imp.i114863.ne... Amazon amzn.to/2KIaAgi
    Canon EOS R: amzn.to/3rjNqxh
    Lens: amzn.to/37BZr9x
    Camera Mic: amzn.to/3avpGAm
    tubes. what does a tube sound like? tube amps. Glenn Fricker, tube microphone. how to mic acoustic guitar. what microphone to use on the guitar. what do tubes sound like? do tubes sound better than solid state? what do tubes do to the sound?
    patchbay, signal flow, recording studio tour music studio tour, commercial recording studio, Classic API preamp, CAPI preamp, Microphone preamp, NEVE preamp, Rupert Neve Master Bus Processor, Portico II, Manley Reference, Manley ELOP, Tube compressor, distressor
    starting a business how to start a business entrepreneur business music business #music industry, home studio, home recording studio, grow your business, how to grow your business online, how to grow your business, how to save money, money saving tips, start a business, entrepreneurship, recording studio loser, music production, in home studio, music producer, how to, music production tips, picking a daw, which daw should i pick, which daw is best

Komentáře • 62

  • @RecordingStudioLoser
    @RecordingStudioLoser  Před 2 lety +6

    Curious if you can hear a difference on youtube... Or if you downloaded the tracks and listened in your own space! Let me know!

    • @giovannipaglioli2302
      @giovannipaglioli2302 Před 2 lety

      I can hear the difference on CZcams with a pair of good headphones. Mostly in the dynamic and harmonic reproduction of the sound. I suspect that the CZcams algorithms for compression also changes the sound on an harmonic content basis. These are AI and machine learning based so is very interesting the way they "hear" the sound comparing on thousands of listening experiences.

    • @futurebeats898
      @futurebeats898 Před 2 lety

      Pretty obvious for me. Tube = more lows and highs. Relative to mids

    • @coin777
      @coin777 Před rokem +1

      Tube has more sparkle clarity and dimensionality.

    • @AliKozy
      @AliKozy Před rokem

      I preferred the tube 013 on the distorted guitar. Its subtle but really complimented the fuzzy warmth. Loved it. Totally agree with your analysis. Greatly perceived and explained. Agree would be great if they had a version where you can flip a switch and have both FET and Tube in the same mic.

  • @nickjbland
    @nickjbland Před 2 lety +5

    I was hearing a slightly slower transient response with the Tube mics which seemed to reduce some of the spikier highs in a pleasant way. People in the comments are also saying it feels a little more open? I can see that. In all honesty though, the differences were extremely subtle.

  • @AliKozy
    @AliKozy Před rokem +6

    I've noticed while listening that the Fet version of the mics sound crisper and a touch more forward. As in you get a slight bit more clarity and presence. Not in a bad way at all. The tube mics sound a touch (minuscule) bit warmer and less present in the highs. Which is down to the saturation characteristics of the tube in the circuit. Both sound amazing. Just depends on subjective preference and what suits the song and music. I reckon you can get a decent sound using either versions. Tube ones just have that - I can do this easily and you can push me more attitude. Listening in a some what treated home studio on pretty decent monitors. I'm going for the Fet 017 myself. Great video. Would have loved to hear on vocals.

  • @BadChizzle
    @BadChizzle Před 2 lety +1

    So many places tubes and FETs are used. Preamp in a guitar amp… two different tubes can sound very different… and at the same time… an fet placed properly in that place can create warmth that’s close in a less expensive way, with far less voltage. Giving an otherwise dull circuit some harmonic content needed to bring things to life.
    So… overdriven tubes as apposed to FETs is another fun area of exploration you could tackle in future, if you have not done so. Keep in mind, all FETs are not created equal.
    This is why we measure them before we place them in our pedals when making them.
    Thank you for putting up with me. I had fun watching this one!
    Chuk

  • @thesearethesuns
    @thesearethesuns Před 2 lety +2

    More so on the LDC than the SDC: there is more openness and ‘roundness’ on the tube mics… the FETs seem to produce a flatter and clean signal. I agree with your assessment of the sound of a “bloom” from the tube-that’s an accurate account. Both beautiful sounding, and each have their respective applications.

  • @jonathanhorne6503
    @jonathanhorne6503 Před 3 měsíci

    With me and tubes it’s about understanding the circuits and how to build and repair. I’m a septuagenarian and tubes wee all I knew. When I started playing Blackface Fenders were in the stores new. I have several tube mics too and frankly both types sound good as long as the mic is healthy. They’ve come a long way since my band had two Shure 55 mics

  • @kevinbatchelor9566
    @kevinbatchelor9566 Před 2 lety +8

    With these mics and sources, the tube version felt more hifi to me. Really cool comparison.

  • @imnotoriousnate
    @imnotoriousnate Před rokem +2

    Call me crazy but I definitely hear a dynamic difference between these mics. The tube was really giving me vibes bro.

  • @codycreepcore
    @codycreepcore Před 2 lety +2

    The way you described the top end of the tube mic is pretty much the exact wording I would have used.

  • @thesearethesuns
    @thesearethesuns Před 26 dny

    Relistened after two years… I definitely hear it. The low mids sound denser and perhaps “bloom” with the tube
    microphone. I hear more overtones/harmonics. The FET is fast. I could see what you mean by limitations, because the picture of the sound is processed quickly and seems less dimensional and complete.

  • @alexlechanteur3606
    @alexlechanteur3606 Před 2 lety +6

    Those Soyuz sounds so nice ! I've felt like tube sounded a bit more open and wide than the fet version. For me, Fet mics always had a bit of a "compressed" sound wich can be really great. For me with tube they usually sounds just more open, there's more air and it sounds just natural and "organic". Nice comparison !

  • @seanwalsh999
    @seanwalsh999 Před 2 lety +1

    Well now I know why the 57 is the industry standard. Thanks for the test.

    • @BojanBojovic
      @BojanBojovic Před měsícem

      Industry standard is a myth. Just use your gear and enjoy.

  •  Před 2 měsíci

    Well i think WARM is the most ambiguous word used to define a sonic character. As I read in the comments, warm is a different thing for each one of us. For me the FET was definitely the "warmer" that meaning, less bright and bity, slower transient response, or less attack you might say, maybe "creamier". The tube to me had more top end, "open" you might say, I felt a less compressed sound. "warm " would´t be the adjective i´d use for the tube.. I dont know, for me "warm" is like the bridge pickup of a strat vs all the others, definitely more bottom end and less bity,. Would love to hear your thoughts though as I´m not a native english speaker.

  • @deangiamette8367
    @deangiamette8367 Před 2 lety +2

    Both the mics in the video were transformer balanced I believe. Same xfrmer, similar sound? It would be interesting to add an electronically balanced FET vs Xfrmr balanced tube. Just to know how the transformer skews the results.

  • @DeeLo256
    @DeeLo256 Před 4 měsíci

    That tube sounds warmer forsure.

  • @JayBeBerg
    @JayBeBerg Před 2 lety +2

    Over youtube the 013 fet sounded warmer and the 013 tube more hifi. Not what I expected.

  • @satch72
    @satch72 Před 2 lety +1

    This is super ineteresting to hear the difference. Pretty subtle over CZcams but I hear what you're saying about the high end on the tube mics sounding more open. I hear the difference more on the LDC than the small. Wouldn't mind hearing the difference's between them and some of the other workhorse mics you have.

  • @davebird534
    @davebird534 Před 9 měsíci

    The difference right away on the first acoustic demo . Not sure what you guys are hearing but I'm hearing it. Not a huge difference but there is definitely a difference! The effete is brighter on top has a little more pronounced upper mid-range. The tube Mike has a fuller low mids and middle mids , like up to maybe around 1k. It's a little more compressed in smoother ,slightly less harsh . Course now if you put a vintage tube in there that's going to change it to and most likely for the better if you get the right one !

  • @casemcdonald2152
    @casemcdonald2152 Před 2 lety

    From what I've read, the only difference is with excess. A fet, or any solid state transistor, will clip. A tube will overdrive, and distort.

  • @alexmasters23
    @alexmasters23 Před 2 lety +1

    1. the biggest difference i heard on youtube was the 017 on the acoustic. the mid-forwardness you heard in the fet i heard as a midscoop in the tube hahaha 2. you got me i bought two drums packs along with the unprocessed files

    • @RecordingStudioLoser
      @RecordingStudioLoser  Před 2 lety

      1 Interesting I'll have to go back and listen again!
      2 😂😂 I hope you like them!

  • @seacave853
    @seacave853 Před 2 lety

    tube stuff has superb clarity

  • @darrylweller6143
    @darrylweller6143 Před 2 lety +1

    Trying decide between the 013 tube and 017 fet, for acoustic guitar. This was good

    • @RecordingStudioLoser
      @RecordingStudioLoser  Před 2 lety

      The fet is cool. I feel like the 013 tube has way more uses.
      However if your just looking at Acoustic guitar the 017 would be my pic.

    • @darrylweller6143
      @darrylweller6143 Před 2 lety

      @@RecordingStudioLoser
      017 fet or the tube? for acoustic guitar

  • @jerrymckenzie1858
    @jerrymckenzie1858 Před 2 lety +2

    My take on these types of comparisons is: If you can't really tell the difference, it doesn't really matter much.

    • @BukanIbuMu
      @BukanIbuMu Před 2 lety

      Until someone on Gearspace telling you that your ears are wrong.

    • @RecordingStudioLoser
      @RecordingStudioLoser  Před 2 lety

      Totally! if it can't be heard on your main source of capture... why bother

  • @zeitakulobusta
    @zeitakulobusta Před 2 měsíci

    Tubes generally have an...un-limited sweetness and def have a character - on voice try a 5-star vs a Mullard and it's obvious. Warm doesn't have to mean mushy, hazy or flabby bottom-heavy.
    Poor analogy but it reminds me of midi control vs an analog knob...stepped vs smooth and continuous. That said though there are def times when a good fet is the better choice for a more controlled sound though.

  • @68Snaps
    @68Snaps Před rokem

    I know this is an old video, but I'm currently looking for an LDC mic and hesitate between FET and Tube. And I think I finally nailed the difference. Or it's just my brain that's uniquely weird, and it won't translate to anyone. But here's what I hear, and it's more obvious on the acoustic guitar. Stereo studio monitors are great to translate left to right sound sources, but also give some sense of depth to some sounds. Some seem closer (in your face) , some seem further (emanating from the speaker cones). Well, with the FET mic, all the notes of the guitar seem to emanate from the same distance. With the Tube mic, higher pitched notes seem to be closer to you, and lower notes seem further. It's like the Tube sound is 3D, and the FET sound emanates from a flat plane. I went to audition the grand piano through the 017 FET and 017 Tube on the Soyuz yt channel, and I got the same impression.
    Could this be it?

  • @giovannipaglioli2302
    @giovannipaglioli2302 Před 2 lety +2

    I can hear the differences on CZcams too, yes. To my ear they are subtle tonally speaking but emotionally they are quite different. I can hear much more even harmonics content in the tube mic that our brain "traduction" is: this is more "real" and full and that's the sound af that instrument! But in my opinion is just a matter of psycoacoustic. We like more even harmonics respect to odd ones, tubes tends to produce even harmonic saturation and the dynamics is more "real" resembling better the natural compression that happen in the airmass. This is better? No or Yes, it depends on what Your intentions. That's my two cents and thanks for this shootout!

    • @G60syncro
      @G60syncro Před 2 lety +1

      I thought it was my eyes tricking me into hearing stuff as well but yeah! That upbeat acoustic guitar part in the second bit did sound a bit more lively and brighter to my ears with the tube mic, even on CZcams! But in the end, don't fret on it! I've got a huge wishlist and I'm filling the slots as the years go by and we make do with what we got in the garage studio. Every Friday session is a blast and now that gigs are on the horizon, it's just more motivation to get more stuff written so we can jam out!

    • @paranoidjones
      @paranoidjones Před 2 lety

      agree. my ear goes to the reinforced fundamental firming up the sound before it notices the compressed upper harmonics that make it sound 'more open.' also I feel like when people say the fet sounds compressed they mean with a slower attack that exaggerates the transient- but the fet is actually more 'accurate' than the tube from a measurement standpoint and the linear transient response makes it sound thinner and more pokey to me.

  • @AliKozy
    @AliKozy Před rokem

    P.s. you'd hear more fidelity on vocals! Maybe not a massive difference but definitely a slight different.

  • @68Snaps
    @68Snaps Před 2 lety +1

    Wow totally crazy! Maybe my ears are bad, or I need to change my old HD600, but there wasn't much difference between the 57, FET and tube!!! Mhhhh.... That's an interesting giveaway. The 57 has notorious little low end! If the mics didn't pick much of a difference it could be because of the mid/hi content of the guitar playing... I would love to see the exact same concept with an upright bass (or an electric bass), and on a male "deep" voice (think isaac hayes ;-) ).
    Anyway, a big thank you for honest videos, where the urban legends are sometimes busted.

    • @RecordingStudioLoser
      @RecordingStudioLoser  Před 2 lety +1

      Good points. Yes I'm excited to try them elsewhere. I have one I'm filming tonight. That's a little absurd. But still a fun experiment. Not vocals or bass. But a lot more strings.

  • @DavidDicksRFR
    @DavidDicksRFR Před 2 lety

    Great video!

  • @darrylweller6143
    @darrylweller6143 Před 2 lety +2

    Is the tube the winner for you?

    • @RecordingStudioLoser
      @RecordingStudioLoser  Před 2 lety

      I had owned a tube 017 before they sent me these. So testing had been fun that said I think it is the winner because I can make the tube do what the fet does. But I can make the fet do what the tube does. If that makes sense.
      In my mind I would pay the extra. But I'm also recording lots of high end sensitive things. Besides drum overheads. Choirs... orchestral. Bluegrass stuff... so to me it's well worth it. But that won't be the case for everyone.

    • @darrylweller6143
      @darrylweller6143 Před 2 lety

      @@RecordingStudioLoser
      Thank you, wondering how the tube sdc are verses the tube 017 for acoustic guitar.

  • @Bcwilderness
    @Bcwilderness Před rokem

    lol funny toothpaste on shirt :) gtreat content guy

    • @Bcwilderness
      @Bcwilderness Před rokem

      how i describe hi fi is cheap dyn fet to tube equals the diff of 1 bull through the gate 2 or 3, 3 will always be more present and thats no bull baybee no go blow some fukin windows out with a clean t shirt yeehaa sozuz are cool

  • @blashuvec
    @blashuvec Před 2 lety +1

    for me the tube is all detail more than mojo. detailed in a sense that it sounds like it's more active in capturing all the nuances and it's working harder than the FET. it's like the tube is a 20 piece puzzle set and while FET is like 15 or 10 lol both are great and to me it's all just mixing it all up depending on your mood if you're not so sure what to use on a session which happens a lot cuz there are TONS of ways to recording one thing tbh haha

  • @fetusbelt6851
    @fetusbelt6851 Před 2 lety

    Tube sounds loudest for sure, but not necesarilly best

  • @jamesr141
    @jamesr141 Před rokem

    Maybe you just mixed the mics up? 😂

  • @kenwilliams7597
    @kenwilliams7597 Před 2 lety

    The tube had more body in the bottom end.

  • @jasonsneed3731
    @jasonsneed3731 Před 2 lety

    No BIG difference to my ears. If anything it was probably the positioning of the mic. At lease on youtube. I'll download the samples.

    • @jasonsneed3731
      @jasonsneed3731 Před 2 lety +1

      I downloaded the files and the difference is there for sure. The fet on the distorted guitar sounds like its struggling / less headroom. The Tube had a bit more bandwidth than the fet.

  • @caspermaster-com
    @caspermaster-com Před 2 lety

    Tube def has more alive topend, more charismatic.

  • @KarenBasset
    @KarenBasset Před 2 lety

    The side chain from your voice to background music is set too drastic. It pumps. Love your content, just letting you know.
    It sounds like your voice is going through a guitar tremolo.

    • @RecordingStudioLoser
      @RecordingStudioLoser  Před 2 lety

      interesting.... there is no sidechain happening. I just turn down the background and automate up in the intro stinger and the end. otherwise theres nothing happening. Anyone else notice this?

  • @troycharbonneau8643
    @troycharbonneau8643 Před rokem

    Just listening on a phone speaker here, and I hear a clear difference. FET sounds limited and dull, like it’s coming from a cheap boombox. Tube sounds live, more nuances, more lows, more life, more reverb.