Really nice vid! Would be interested in an IPS black 38" 1600p with a good local dimming feature. Do you happen to know what the CSOT roadmap looks like too? The monitor sized HVA displays they showed at CES looked stunning.
true, but it would not have burn in and color fringing issues. and a good antiglare coating for nice everyday use in different lighting conditions. but they didn't anounce a 32" 16:9 high refresh panel, yet :\
A-TW making a comeback is great. I'm still using a 12+ year old NEC pro monitor with A-TW. It greatly improves the presentation and basically removes IPS glow.
A-TW polariser on my old NEC SpectraView 2690 was doing some real heavy lifting. I am at a loss as to why this polariser technology is not ubiquitous in premium displays.
@@tftcentralhi been watching u for a while just bought this monitor to use for my ps5 any settings recommendations? I tried using hdr on but is too dark expecially when i play warzone
I've been absolutely loving my 42" C2 but definitely miss higher refresh rates and it sucks to use for work just due to babying it. A 27" 240hz 4k that can also do 480hz 1080P as an IPS seems like a phenomenal all-rounder as long as the response times are good and we're given a variable overdrive option, either via GSYNC or via its OSD. There better be a damn KVM and USB-C 90W too. I'd miss the blacks and instant response times from the TV but having one panel for everything will be great.
I found a displaydaily article which says IPS black is actually a novel change in materials, but that one of the few casualties was response times. Hopefully we can see it improve as AUO are working on it too, but for now especially with miniLED I'd wonder if improving VA's colours/angles is more practical for HRR
@@tftcentral any chance for a review of the high refresh rate stuff (u2724de, u3425we and u4025qw)? It's hard to find proper monitor reviews let alone when it comes to professional work oriented ones and everyone seems to be focused on the OLED
@lemonbrothers3462 we would like to and have been talking to Dell about them but their PR team don’t seem to have anything available. Will keep chasing
Thanks for this. The new obsession with OLED has me baffled… sure they look amazing and are great for gaming, but how many people have a PC they only use for games? I want a screen I can leave on all day and has sharp text. My only concern is the price of that new Dell 40” UW… ouch.
Bought last year the Lenovo P40w-20 based on the 40" LG IPS panel. Mostly for programming and I think these are the best of what you can get if you want both an ultrawide (to tile additional windows, I'm working with a 1:2:1 layout) and as much height as you can (to get as many lines of code as possible). There's not much competition in this segment, Lenovo, Dell and I think HP all are using the LG panel and even bundle it with similar options (like a built-in KVM). Good to see these niche panels still have some future. I've seen Dell already announced their version with the IPS Black one. Maybe a 32:9 panel would be even better, but if one targets display height, the only alternative to the 40" is the 57" Samsung, which basically works like 3 old-school 4:3 displays side-by-side.
I'm really tempted for an IPS Black 37.5 inch 3840x1600 panel with high refresh rate... this size as an OLED-monitor would be awesome as well, but I guess this won't be happening anytime soon
Excited by the prospect of a large-format monitor with a pixel density suitable for 2x scaling, and dual-mode refresh rates. That 6K screen would be an awesome hybrid productivity/gaming screen if you could run at either 6k60Hz or 3k240Hz. Though I really hope these are the early steps that eventually lead to a 42" 8k panel that can run at either 60Hz natively, or 240Hz at 4k.
The 40" UW has awesome specs but I think 2000:1 and even 3000:1 contrast ratios are simply too little too late in a world where mini-led and OLED are finally hitting their stride... but uhhh... sign me up for an OLED/QOLED version of that...
possible to do a video on LG 27GR95UM. I have not seen anyone review or really talk about this new monitor. I see they recently released an update that fixed many of the issues it had at launch
I’m waiting for the u4025q cause aside from the new panel which does look really promising, it would also be a perfect double use for work/gaming thanks to the thunderbolt 4 kvm that comes integrated in the monitor, hope i’ll notice some picture quality improvements from my current dual 1440p LG NanoIPS setup
My ideal monitor and the one I have kind of been waiting for even though it is a very slim chance it will exist would be: Criteria Monitor: Mini LED (minimum 2000 zones). No OLED because of the risk of burn in and the low brightness Excellent HDR HDR with a minimum brightness of 1000 nits full screen sustained 200+Hz 4k, 32 inch IPS Excellent colors and excellent color accuracy Excellent uniformity Excellent response times (less than 3ms is acceptable) Excellent contrast DP 2.1 Excellent motion clarity Flat screen
Pretty much what I want as well. only: IPS Black ( I guess you cover that with "Excellent Contrast", particularly as you said it twice!) 120 Hz, I'd be happy with that, but accept higher. DP 2.1 not mandatory, as I've been convinced it isn't necessary for 4K at 120 Hz. Of course, I would like some future-proofing. Must have USB-C inputs. Outputs could be mixed. Must all be USB 3.2 Gen2 20 Gbps ports. USB 4 or compatible Thunderbolt would be acceptable. Must be a flat screen. Wish list: DP 2.1 One DP input, two DP output, so I can drive three 4K screens via one cable, daisy chaining my two side monitors together. (My side monitors don't have DP out.)
@@RoderickGI seems like a solid list! The only 2 things I have something to say about are DP 2.1 and 120Hz 120Hz for me seems to be a pretty low refresh rate and the bare minimum for a monitor. Also depends on the price tag of course I personally think that if a new monitor comes out with an expensive price tag (let’s say 1000 dollars) then it just wouldn’t sell because 120Hz at that price point is unacceptable. I have a monitor that has 120Hz and I bought that thing 6 years ago and back then it was just over 1200 dollars. So a monitor with 120Hz now for gaming would be a no go (unless you are mainly using it for something else of course hahah) DP2.1 that has to be on the monitor. Yes, I have heard all the things about Dp 1.4 with DSC not being a problem but to me that sounds like an excuse to not implement the latest feature and just to cheap out generally. Again, it depends on what price points you’re looking at but if a monitor that is $1000 or higher doesn’t have DP 2.1 to me that is unacceptable. I’m gonna be spending a premium price on something I expect premium features especially because the future GPU will definitely have a DP 2.1 port
@@emiel255 I can't disagree with any of that, and yes, it comes down to price and value for money. My main monitor, used for some games when new but now mostly for business applications, is a Dell 3008WFP from 2009. It cost about AU$2250. If I was paying that much again I would want all the latest technology. Getting 15 years out of a monitor that is still working fine is pretty impressive. It owes me nothing. But I would like to match resolutions with my two 4K Dell 27" monitors that I use on the sides. My main use is business applications these days, which is why I would accept 120 Hz and DP 1.4 if the price was right. More around AU$1000 to AU$1200. I'd pay the price of the 3008WFP again, maybe a bit more, if it had higher USB specs, such as USB 4 v2.0+ with 80 Gbps, a built-in KVM Switch, and two PC inputs. Driving three 4K monitors via a USB-C cable would be... interesting. It would also save a lot on an external KVM and the use of USB for Ethernet sharing and driving the two 4K screens, for which I have a fast USB hub. Higher refresh rates for a little gaming again, at 4K, would certainly be nice. I'm still trying to decide between a gaming or Business monitor for that reason. But they wouldn't have the built-in KVM and other Business features.
Hey Simon! Thanks for these roadmap updates, they're very informative! Just to clarify, there's still no 27" 1440p 120Hz IPS Black monitors to feature adaptive sync, right?
Adaptive sync is added by the monitor manuf via the scaler so it’s hard to say what will and won’t be produced. Not sure whether the Dell Model does or doesn’t feature it tbh, not seen it confirmed. But it seems like it would be an odd omission given there’s no cost to it as such
@@tftcentral I've read somewhere that Dell doesn't support any form of adaptive sync in its launched IPS Black displays, implying those are for productivity work. Would've really been a shame not to add it still as 120Hz 1440p is quite good for casual gaming.
I feel like the biggest problem with IPS monitors is the off axis blacklight glow at the edges of the screen. I wonder if it could be reduced by adjusting the polarisers
Any idea why none of these new monitors are using gsync modules? All of them are only gsync compatible. None are gsync ultimate for example, and the last gsync ultimate was that first QD oled UW dell released. What's the hold up? gsync ultimate on oled seems to provide better hdr calibration out of the box?
I imagine there will be cut down version 27" 240hz 1440P IPS Black. If there is, that is the one I want. I wouldn't be able to have fun with OLED, I would be thinking I may be wasting OLED life span on bad game.
Everything new is welcome in the 37-45" UW high refresh rate monitor range. Still more temped by the WOLEDs coming in 2025 but I'll keep an open mind on this IPS black tech.
What the market is missing is 1440p panel on a smaller inch/size combining the benefits of stellar ppi almost to the likes of 4k but adding the benefits of 1440p more usable for super high hz on the GPUs and the added benefit of a smallers screen better peripheral vision for competitive fps. Id say the ideal would be a 25.5” 1440p 300hz.
Some 23.8" 1440p 300Hz+ monitors would be KILLER, but panel manufacturers are all quite garbage and refuse to make ACTUALLY GOOD small gaming displays, right now it is all 1080p garbage 😭
funny enough before i got my Aw2723df 280hz 27'' 1440p where i sold all my older monitors i did have an old 24'' 1440p 165hz Dell S2417DG and the concept of that monitor even tho it was TN it was insane, super responsive and seriously nice lookin 1440p at 24'' the ppi and sharpness was nuts @@shanksisnoteventhatstrongbruh
Damn black ips and 360hz 1440p. Sounds perfect if it wasnt for the new oleds. But if those turn out to have bad burn in for users that use them more then gaming it will be good option.
IPS Black could make 8K LCD viable again. 3,000:1 contrast on a 55" 8K120hz LCD would be fantastic. (The Samsung QN900C is still only 1,700:1 contrast).
IPS black looks really promising, and if they would use also improved polarizer, even better. But I believe the production dates are pushed too far. Of course you need to deliver reliable panels, but by the next year the OLED panels will probably improve to offer 300+nits in SDR and better resistance to burn-in. It is really nice to see monitor market becoming competitive, but I do not think I am prepared to wait for another year to upgrade.
@@user-wm1tb7ji5t Why? Contrast is still minuscle compared to OLED (apart from Q-OLED in a brightly lit environment) and response times are noticably slower as well (and I'm afraid they'll get slower with higher contrast, which seems to be typical behaviour for LCD panels). It's an amazing development nevertheless, especially if the prices won't be ridiculous, but for people who can really afford OLED displays there are few reasons to be interested in IPS Black. By really being able to afford I mean being able to replace them in 3 years in case of burn-in that MAY occur due to suboptimal use cases paired with lack of appropriate care/precautions or something else happens to them. I'm guilty of getting things I'm not actually able to afford in this way myself.
Damn, really? ZERO 23.8"-24.5" 1440p 300Hz+ options... im gonna cry man, 1st AUO with no 23.8" 1440p high Hz gaming panels and now LG Display too refuses to make ACTUALLY GOOD small gaming panels, LG Display is a massive disappointment.
Each has their own benefits and characteristics. This video includes a comparison and pros and cons Which is the Best 32" OLED Monitor for You? czcams.com/video/9DIFeckaKls/video.html
Great for office work and SOME creative applications I'm sure, Dead tech for gaming. As soon as we get PHOLED is game over for ANY other panel tech for gaming that isn't a evolution of OLED/ PHOLED. Everything else is just too slow, and with the efficiency PHOOLED will bring, the already small/ unlikely chance of getting burn in will drop to almost ZERO while offering better HDR and ultra Elite speed that nothing else can touch. PLS just ditch everything else and advance OLED stuff as fast as possible LCD ANYTHING is just an obsolete waste of valuable resources and money.
The 5k2k 120hz is my endgame for monitors. Enough real estate with clean fonts for work, and small enough pixels for me to not mind non-integer scaling in games.
@@thecwwshow8036 Yeah it's ultrawide 4k (same vertical res), but since "ultrawide 4k" could also mean same horizontal res (3840 x whatever) it is way simpler to just call it 5k2k.
i would like to get one of those 1440p 480hz monitors to compete in games, but i think the war against cheaters is lost, therefore i will go for the 4k 240hz models to enjoy singleplayer and cooperative games and movies.
As a console gamer I can't imagine the struggle of competetive multiplayer gaming on PC. You have guys with 240 Hz (soon 480 Hz) OLEDs or 500 Hz TN/IPS monitors and other high-end hardware from CPU and GPU to gaming mice(?) with up to a few times more fluidity and responsiveness thanks to higher FPS and lower input latency etc; you have guys using on-display crosshairs, black equalizers and similar stuff; and then you have straight up cheaters (though I'd argue the previous category are cheaters too).
I'm glad that they are already developing IPS Black 2.0
Gives us confidence that this technology is with us for a long time.
thanks for keeping us up to date 👍
Really nice vid! Would be interested in an IPS black 38" 1600p with a good local dimming feature.
Do you happen to know what the CSOT roadmap looks like too? The monitor sized HVA displays they showed at CES looked stunning.
No I’m afraid we don’t have any info on their roadmap
4k 32 inch 240hz IPS Black for desktop and gaming use.
i want one
It may be good but backlight bleed is still there.
With the new gorilla glass gloss!
true, but it would not have burn in and color fringing issues. and a good antiglare coating for nice everyday use in different lighting conditions. but they didn't anounce a 32" 16:9 high refresh panel, yet :\
Just get OLED
A-TW making a comeback is great. I'm still using a 12+ year old NEC pro monitor with A-TW. It greatly improves the presentation and basically removes IPS glow.
A-TW polariser on my old NEC SpectraView 2690 was doing some real heavy lifting. I am at a loss as to why this polariser technology is not ubiquitous in premium displays.
yeah i'm hoping it will make a big return :)
@@tftcentralhi been watching u for a while just bought this monitor to use for my ps5 any settings recommendations? I tried using hdr on but is too dark expecially when i play warzone
Which monitor do you mean?
@@tftcentral the new alienware 324k oled
@@tftcentralthe new Alienware 32 4k oled
I wonder if we'll see a 5k/1440p dual-mode option at some point in the future. Would be much more enticing to me, at least on a 32 panel.
It would be perfect on a 27 inch panel
Please review the LG 27GR95UM !
Thank you for these videos!
I'm very interested to see the response time tests of these IPS Black panels. 🙃
I've been absolutely loving my 42" C2 but definitely miss higher refresh rates and it sucks to use for work just due to babying it. A 27" 240hz 4k that can also do 480hz 1080P as an IPS seems like a phenomenal all-rounder as long as the response times are good and we're given a variable overdrive option, either via GSYNC or via its OSD. There better be a damn KVM and USB-C 90W too. I'd miss the blacks and instant response times from the TV but having one panel for everything will be great.
You can get kvm and pd from other device, don't try to push everything into one device, it will become irreplaceable.
Was hoping news about some 27 inch Dual mode IPS Black display with mini LED :/
I found a displaydaily article which says IPS black is actually a novel change in materials, but that one of the few casualties was response times. Hopefully we can see it improve as AUO are working on it too, but for now especially with miniLED I'd wonder if improving VA's colours/angles is more practical for HRR
5:57 there's is one monitor already available with that 24:10 ~38'' panel, the Dell U3824DW that launched alongside the 49'' model
So there is! That one slipped by us undetected 😀
@@tftcentral any chance for a review of the high refresh rate stuff (u2724de, u3425we and u4025qw)? It's hard to find proper monitor reviews let alone when it comes to professional work oriented ones and everyone seems to be focused on the OLED
@lemonbrothers3462 we would like to and have been talking to Dell about them but their PR team don’t seem to have anything available. Will keep chasing
Is there any information about a 27" 4k 120hz+ IPS black monitor?
Will there be a newer version of the Dell U2723QE monitor?
All the info we have at the moment is contained in this video I’m afraid
Any IPS black models planed with Mini-LED FALD for Real HDR?
Not on this latest roadmap unfortunately
Thanks for this. The new obsession with OLED has me baffled… sure they look amazing and are great for gaming, but how many people have a PC they only use for games? I want a screen I can leave on all day and has sharp text. My only concern is the price of that new Dell 40” UW… ouch.
Bought last year the Lenovo P40w-20 based on the 40" LG IPS panel. Mostly for programming and I think these are the best of what you can get if you want both an ultrawide (to tile additional windows, I'm working with a 1:2:1 layout) and as much height as you can (to get as many lines of code as possible). There's not much competition in this segment, Lenovo, Dell and I think HP all are using the LG panel and even bundle it with similar options (like a built-in KVM). Good to see these niche panels still have some future. I've seen Dell already announced their version with the IPS Black one. Maybe a 32:9 panel would be even better, but if one targets display height, the only alternative to the 40" is the 57" Samsung, which basically works like 3 old-school 4:3 displays side-by-side.
I would so love to see more 5120x2160 monitor options. 😍
I'm really tempted for an IPS Black 37.5 inch 3840x1600 panel with high refresh rate... this size as an OLED-monitor would be awesome as well, but I guess this won't be happening anytime soon
no plans in the OLED space, no. But the IPS Black option looks attractive :)
@@tftcentralWhy only 60 Hz though while the 40" 5120 x 2160 is 120 Hz?
Finally my preferred resolution again. But 60Hz only would be very, very disappointing indeed...
Can't wait for dual mode 5K > 1440p with high refresh rates.
Excited by the prospect of a large-format monitor with a pixel density suitable for 2x scaling, and dual-mode refresh rates.
That 6K screen would be an awesome hybrid productivity/gaming screen if you could run at either 6k60Hz or 3k240Hz.
Though I really hope these are the early steps that eventually lead to a 42" 8k panel that can run at either 60Hz natively, or 240Hz at 4k.
The 40" UW has awesome specs but I think 2000:1 and even 3000:1 contrast ratios are simply too little too late in a world where mini-led and OLED are finally hitting their stride... but uhhh... sign me up for an OLED/QOLED version of that...
32” 4K 240hz mini led and great brightness with minimal halo. My dream 😢
I want a large-format 21:9 or 24:10 over 40" - 43" or 46" ideally. IPS 120Hz annnnnnnnnd 6k resolution please. that would be perfect.
Amazing, black IPS looks promising gives a middle ground to oled .
The lack of progression of the contrast ratio is depressing.
possible to do a video on LG 27GR95UM.
I have not seen anyone review or really talk about this new monitor.
I see they recently released an update that fixed many of the issues it had at launch
I’m waiting for the u4025q cause aside from the new panel which does look really promising, it would also be a perfect double use for work/gaming thanks to the thunderbolt 4 kvm that comes integrated in the monitor, hope i’ll notice some picture quality improvements from my current dual 1440p LG NanoIPS setup
yeah that looks a good new screen!
Any news on different sizing options for the 6144 by 3456 option? Think they’ll do a 45” version?
We don’t have any other info on that at the moment beyond what’s in this video I’m afraid
No mini led still? >:(
my MacBook pro's display is almost as good as an OLED in most ways and better in brightness etc! no burn in either
Hi. Any updates on 27" 1440p 480 Hz WOLED coatings? Only matte announced so far? No glossy or gorilla?
no, not for the 480Hz panel. In fact there's only one screen announced so far, the Asus PG27AQDP and that will be standard matte
My ideal monitor and the one I have kind of been waiting for even though it is a very slim chance it will exist would be:
Criteria Monitor:
Mini LED (minimum 2000 zones). No OLED because of the risk of burn in and the low brightness
Excellent HDR
HDR with a minimum brightness of 1000 nits full screen sustained
200+Hz
4k, 32 inch
IPS
Excellent colors and excellent color accuracy
Excellent uniformity
Excellent response times (less than 3ms is acceptable)
Excellent contrast
DP 2.1
Excellent motion clarity
Flat screen
Pretty much what I want as well. only:
IPS Black ( I guess you cover that with "Excellent Contrast", particularly as you said it twice!)
120 Hz, I'd be happy with that, but accept higher.
DP 2.1 not mandatory, as I've been convinced it isn't necessary for 4K at 120 Hz. Of course, I would like some future-proofing.
Must have USB-C inputs. Outputs could be mixed. Must all be USB 3.2 Gen2 20 Gbps ports. USB 4 or compatible Thunderbolt would be acceptable.
Must be a flat screen.
Wish list:
DP 2.1 One DP input, two DP output, so I can drive three 4K screens via one cable, daisy chaining my two side monitors together. (My side monitors don't have DP out.)
@@RoderickGI seems like a solid list! The only 2 things I have something to say about are DP 2.1 and 120Hz
120Hz for me seems to be a pretty low refresh rate and the bare minimum for a monitor. Also depends on the price tag of course I personally think that if a new monitor comes out with an expensive price tag (let’s say 1000 dollars) then it just wouldn’t sell because 120Hz at that price point is unacceptable. I have a monitor that has 120Hz and I bought that thing 6 years ago and back then it was just over 1200 dollars. So a monitor with 120Hz now for gaming would be a no go (unless you are mainly using it for something else of course hahah)
DP2.1 that has to be on the monitor. Yes, I have heard all the things about Dp 1.4 with DSC not being a problem but to me that sounds like an excuse to not implement the latest feature and just to cheap out generally. Again, it depends on what price points you’re looking at but if a monitor that is $1000 or higher doesn’t have DP 2.1 to me that is unacceptable. I’m gonna be spending a premium price on something I expect premium features especially because the future GPU will definitely have a DP 2.1 port
@@emiel255 I can't disagree with any of that, and yes, it comes down to price and value for money.
My main monitor, used for some games when new but now mostly for business applications, is a Dell 3008WFP from 2009. It cost about AU$2250. If I was paying that much again I would want all the latest technology. Getting 15 years out of a monitor that is still working fine is pretty impressive. It owes me nothing. But I would like to match resolutions with my two 4K Dell 27" monitors that I use on the sides.
My main use is business applications these days, which is why I would accept 120 Hz and DP 1.4 if the price was right. More around AU$1000 to AU$1200.
I'd pay the price of the 3008WFP again, maybe a bit more, if it had higher USB specs, such as USB 4 v2.0+ with 80 Gbps, a built-in KVM Switch, and two PC inputs. Driving three 4K monitors via a USB-C cable would be... interesting. It would also save a lot on an external KVM and the use of USB for Ethernet sharing and driving the two 4K screens, for which I have a fast USB hub.
Higher refresh rates for a little gaming again, at 4K, would certainly be nice. I'm still trying to decide between a gaming or Business monitor for that reason. But they wouldn't have the built-in KVM and other Business features.
Question do you leave yor MSI 342C in long run and do you love the monitor im thinking about buying it.
Hey Simon! Thanks for these roadmap updates, they're very informative!
Just to clarify, there's still no 27" 1440p 120Hz IPS Black monitors to feature adaptive sync, right?
Adaptive sync is added by the monitor manuf via the scaler so it’s hard to say what will and won’t be produced. Not sure whether the Dell Model does or doesn’t feature it tbh, not seen it confirmed. But it seems like it would be an odd omission given there’s no cost to it as such
@@tftcentral I've read somewhere that Dell doesn't support any form of adaptive sync in its launched IPS Black displays, implying those are for productivity work. Would've really been a shame not to add it still as 120Hz 1440p is quite good for casual gaming.
I feel like the biggest problem with IPS monitors is the off axis blacklight glow at the edges of the screen. I wonder if it could be reduced by adjusting the polarisers
The A-TW polarizer mentioned can help with that and hopefully will be more widely adopted
Any idea why none of these new monitors are using gsync modules? All of them are only gsync compatible. None are gsync ultimate for example, and the last gsync ultimate was that first QD oled UW dell released. What's the hold up? gsync ultimate on oled seems to provide better hdr calibration out of the box?
Looking forward to high density PPI OLED UWs
I imagine there will be cut down version 27" 240hz 1440P IPS Black. If there is, that is the one I want. I wouldn't be able to have fun with OLED, I would be thinking I may be wasting OLED life span on bad game.
Is that bad the backlight bleed in ips black technology? i've heard about that a lot
6K? For me 4K is high enough. I would prefer improvements in pixel response time over improvements in black level. This is for gaming.
Everything new is welcome in the 37-45" UW high refresh rate monitor range. Still more temped by the WOLEDs coming in 2025 but I'll keep an open mind on this IPS black tech.
I'm sorely tempted by that U4025QW but 120hz feels a bit pedestrian. Here's to hoping they give it the Alienware treatment.
WQHD 21:9 40 inch with at least 144Hz would be great
What the market is missing is 1440p panel on a smaller inch/size combining the benefits of stellar ppi almost to the likes of 4k but adding the benefits of 1440p more usable for super high hz on the GPUs and the added benefit of a smallers screen better peripheral vision for competitive fps. Id say the ideal would be a 25.5” 1440p 300hz.
Yeah, that would have been a great combination.
Some 23.8" 1440p 300Hz+ monitors would be KILLER, but panel manufacturers are all quite garbage and refuse to make ACTUALLY GOOD small gaming displays, right now it is all 1080p garbage 😭
funny enough before i got my Aw2723df 280hz 27'' 1440p where i sold all my older monitors i did have an old 24'' 1440p 165hz Dell S2417DG and the concept of that monitor even tho it was TN it was insane, super responsive and seriously nice lookin 1440p at 24'' the ppi and sharpness was nuts @@shanksisnoteventhatstrongbruh
Damn black ips and 360hz 1440p. Sounds perfect if it wasnt for the new oleds. But if those turn out to have bad burn in for users that use them more then gaming it will be good option.
Hey does the ATW polariser used in the IPS panel have any disadvantages? There must be a reason why it isnt widely used right?
Saving a buck is a good enough reason for most companies.
A buck saved is a buck ripped off your customer!😂
Limited to 60hz in 2024... Wow. That's nuts. IMHO.
Pls videos to OLED - I want to know everything aboth the new 3. Gen QD OLED and Woled
You’re in luck. We have videos on both linked in the description. Enjoy!
IPS Black could make 8K LCD viable again.
3,000:1 contrast on a 55" 8K120hz LCD would be fantastic. (The Samsung QN900C is still only 1,700:1 contrast).
Can you do
BLACK IPS vs OLED
Best. Thx !
IPS black looks really promising, and if they would use also improved polarizer, even better.
But I believe the production dates are pushed too far. Of course you need to deliver reliable panels, but by the next year the OLED panels will probably improve to offer 300+nits in SDR and better resistance to burn-in.
It is really nice to see monitor market becoming competitive, but I do not think I am prepared to wait for another year to upgrade.
ughhh all i want is a 49 inch super ultrawide oled thats 4k instead of 1440p
the dual mode...they want my money again D:
Not at all interested in anything other than OLED, but I must say, I still watch for your updates & expertise! Keep up the great work.
Awesome! Thank you!
Ips with 3000:1 contrast ratio is something you should be interested in
Same here.
@@user-wm1tb7ji5t Why? Contrast is still minuscle compared to OLED (apart from Q-OLED in a brightly lit environment) and response times are noticably slower as well (and I'm afraid they'll get slower with higher contrast, which seems to be typical behaviour for LCD panels).
It's an amazing development nevertheless, especially if the prices won't be ridiculous, but for people who can really afford OLED displays there are few reasons to be interested in IPS Black. By really being able to afford I mean being able to replace them in 3 years in case of burn-in that MAY occur due to suboptimal use cases paired with lack of appropriate care/precautions or something else happens to them.
I'm guilty of getting things I'm not actually able to afford in this way myself.
IPS black is cool and all, but 120hz is not going to cut it for me.
Try sharpening it.
Damn, really? ZERO 23.8"-24.5" 1440p 300Hz+ options... im gonna cry man, 1st AUO with no 23.8" 1440p high Hz gaming panels and now LG Display too refuses to make ACTUALLY GOOD small gaming panels, LG Display is a massive disappointment.
so no upgrade for the LG 32GQ950-B until at least 2025. No gaming version of the 38" .... so LG doesn't want any money. got it.
Isn't qd oled more superior to woled
Each has their own benefits and characteristics. This video includes a comparison and pros and cons Which is the Best 32" OLED Monitor for You?
czcams.com/video/9DIFeckaKls/video.html
Great for office work and SOME creative applications I'm sure, Dead tech for gaming. As soon as we get PHOLED is game over for ANY other panel tech for gaming that isn't a evolution of OLED/ PHOLED. Everything else is just too slow, and with the efficiency PHOOLED will bring, the already small/ unlikely chance of getting burn in will drop to almost ZERO while offering better HDR and ultra Elite speed that nothing else can touch. PLS just ditch everything else and advance OLED stuff as fast as possible LCD ANYTHING is just an obsolete waste of valuable resources and money.
I feel like IPS Black is a dead end
In what sense?
@@juanblanco7898It's an expensive IPS that's worse than VA and especially OLED
The 5k2k 120hz is my endgame for monitors. Enough real estate with clean fonts for work, and small enough pixels for me to not mind non-integer scaling in games.
5k2k is the ultra wide display? I don’t like that naming :(
That’s just the short hand for the resolution not any monitor name 😀
@@thecwwshow8036 Yeah it's ultrawide 4k (same vertical res), but since "ultrawide 4k" could also mean same horizontal res (3840 x whatever) it is way simpler to just call it 5k2k.
@@tftcentral I know. I just don’t like the short hand name. It’s not consistent with previous resolution. I never see 3k1k.
i would like to get one of those 1440p 480hz monitors to compete in games, but i think the war against cheaters is lost, therefore i will go for the 4k 240hz models to enjoy singleplayer and cooperative games and movies.
As a console gamer I can't imagine the struggle of competetive multiplayer gaming on PC. You have guys with 240 Hz (soon 480 Hz) OLEDs or 500 Hz TN/IPS monitors and other high-end hardware from CPU and GPU to gaming mice(?) with up to a few times more fluidity and responsiveness thanks to higher FPS and lower input latency etc; you have guys using on-display crosshairs, black equalizers and similar stuff; and then you have straight up cheaters (though I'd argue the previous category are cheaters too).