How to Validate Computerized GxP Systems in the Life Sciences 11 08 16

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 6. 08. 2024
  • The cost and time associated with validation of GxP computerized systems can represent a significant part of the overall software implementation budget.
    For many years, life science companies have been burdened with the cumbersome process of validation, often taking as long as the implementations themselves.
    Regulatory agencies have recognized this and recommend a risk-based approach to focus validation efforts on high-risk areas and reduce the validation burden whilst improving quality. This approach is at the core of Montrium’s validation service offering.
    To find out more:
    www.montrium.com/professional...
  • Věda a technologie

Komentáře • 24

  • @pria209
    @pria209 Před 5 lety +5

    A very informative yet concise tutorial, thank you for this.

  • @ameersingh1549
    @ameersingh1549 Před 2 lety

    Very nice explanation. Thank You So Much.

  • @jaiganesh1974
    @jaiganesh1974 Před 6 lety +2

    Nice presentation on validation

  • @zainuddinbrahim4625
    @zainuddinbrahim4625 Před 3 lety

    nice one i can use ur webinar as an example as i am going for a job interview for the IT aspect of LIMS.

  • @santoshkumar2712
    @santoshkumar2712 Před 3 lety

    excellent sessions

  • @jagadeeshponnada8628
    @jagadeeshponnada8628 Před 10 měsíci

    Nice explanation, thank you

  • @aga080
    @aga080 Před 6 lety

    thank you

  • @TheDodwyer
    @TheDodwyer Před 5 lety

    Liked this video, very clear over view of Validation of GxP systems

  • @shaileshyaduvanshi8827
    @shaileshyaduvanshi8827 Před 6 lety +1

    Good Information , Please also make more videos on type of documents which is used , with example of testing and validating any hardware/software

  • @kims144
    @kims144 Před 5 lety +3

    What is the FDA definition of GxP validation? I see GAMP 5 being pushed around a lot. What about ISO 80002-2 and why not use that over GAMP 5? Thank You for the good work and this webinar.

  • @ajithkumar.8316
    @ajithkumar.8316 Před 2 lety

    Very informative

  • @TheZ1A900
    @TheZ1A900 Před rokem

    "Contemporaneous" wow normally "Testing Schedule" :) but nicely spoken and informative

  • @rahulsingade2778
    @rahulsingade2778 Před 3 lety

    thanks........

  • @TechoWeeds
    @TechoWeeds Před 2 lety

    Can we have a PDF doc for reference?

  • @nlrfolkstv8427
    @nlrfolkstv8427 Před 3 lety

    Gud info

  • @sanvagus
    @sanvagus Před 6 lety

    Can you please explain where FQ (functional Qualification) falls in testing or is it different terminology for either IQ, OQ or PQ/UAT ?

    • @pria209
      @pria209 Před 5 lety +2

      Functional Qualification would be the same as OQ, OQ is typically done based on the FRS, PQ on the URS

    • @sumitchaudhary571
      @sumitchaudhary571 Před 4 lety +1

      @@pria209 Do you know how to write test for OQ and PQ?
      is there any tutorial for that you know?

  • @chatnoir7423
    @chatnoir7423 Před 3 lety +1

    @24:52 "Electronically 17% , Paper 42% , Hybrid Approach 42%" 🤔 ........Total = 101% ----> Software Validated !!!!! 🤣🤣🤣. Nonethles still remain a very useful presentation. Thanks 🤗

  • @jongmedellin4890
    @jongmedellin4890 Před 3 lety

    we are interested

  • @gail9114
    @gail9114 Před 4 lety +1

    A lot of information on the basics of computer system validation are provided however it sounds entirely scripted. It is not being presented naturally like many WebEx allowing the audience to feel engaged. it just sounds like she’s reading off a script and rushing through it. So while informative I’ve had to stop and replay often to grasp what is said in order to comprehend it. And I am an experienced senior CSV consultant Who already knows this information.

    • @maheshchavan5569
      @maheshchavan5569 Před 2 lety

      u should motivate instead, dont wast ur time then, go and search any other vidio.