Princess Diana Crash reconstruction 48Hours FULL 8 min
Vložit
- čas přidán 19. 05. 2024
- Segment from 1998 48 Hours episode on Princess Dianna reconstruction by McHenry Consultants.
For details see www.mchenrysoftware.com/board...
Here's links to parts: (edited Feb 2023 removed Tail Light Investigation)
0:00 Princess Diana Crash reconstruction
0:30 Dan Rather Introduction
1:16 Start of Brian McHenry Interview
1:50 Start of Casey Herbert Interview
2:18 The Witnesses are the Car
2:54 Start of Murray Mackay Interview
4:03 Lack of Evidence of motorcycles in proximity
4:28 Summary of McHenry Crash Investigation Findings
5:50 Lack of Seat Belt Use
6:19 Summary by Murray Mackay
#PrincessDianaCrash #3DCrashReconstruction #msmac3D #McHenrySoftware
#PrincessDiana #HVOSM #SMAC #CrashReconstruction
#McHenryConsultants - Věda a technologie
RIP oh lovely Lady, to this day we miss you deeply, God Bless you !❤️🙏🥰💯❤️
We came home from an early movie and turned on the TV! Not a few minutes after the crash, it seems, we sat up till dawn! Our very first thoughts were, horrifyingly, that our Princess had been murdered to prevent a marriage to Dodi. No matter your thoughts about the engagement before, we loved her and Dodi, after Diana's death. I'm not going to pretend I know who and by what method, but it was and still is an unsolved murder
No no no
Stop the silly conspiracy theories
She was not murdered
It was an easily preventable tragedy
Either by not speeding
Not DUI
Wear your seatbelts
Install safety devices in front of the posts (simple metal barriers are used in US to avoid these types if crashes)
But please
Stop the silly conspiracy theories
It was not murder
It was a preventable tragedy
@Abou well abou maybe diana should've resisted dating dodi at all. Getting too close to the fire, one is bound to get burned.
her death will forever be an unsolved mystery
its not a mystery...
its a high profile tragedy...
not unlike many which occurs on the highways of the world every day...
speeding, DUI, seat-belts not worn, and inadequate safety devices on the French roadway.
A simple metal or concrete barrier in front of the bridge support posts along the roadway would have prevented the tragedy (to date they still have not installed barriers in the tunnel)
In the US most bridge posts have simple barriers in front of them to redirect traffic back to direction of the roadway.
I think whoever set a flash off,probably blinded HenriPaul.
cmon really?
if a witness claims they "saw a flash" that was probably the headlights raking across their field of vision as the car slammed into post#13 and rotated to rest
The only "blinded by the light" was the driver blinded by DUI
ETERNA INOLVIDABLE
DIANA
💐💐💐💐💐💐💐💐
There was also someone back of their car. In the picture taken from the tunnel, Diana was looking out from the back window, and the bodyguard tried to look back from the front mirror. Then there was someone taking the picture from in front of the car. Wouldn't you think they were ambushed?
You are mixing and morphing things with no real evidence to support it
That is how conspiracy theories come about
The picture you reference has been used as the 'last pic' and was through the front window. They were being harassed by paparazzi who took many many pictures, some from the front, side, etc
They are used as teaser for click bait...These pictures were taken at some point during the night (see the reconstructed official timeline and path of travel of the vehicle that evening in the official inquisition)
but a picture was NOT taken just before the tunnel
and NOT just before the crash
probably just before Herni Paul sped off and away from them and then lost control and hit pillar #13
But the photo was not part of any conspiracy
the crash was due to DUI, speeding, no protective devices in front of the pillars, and the loss of control of the vehicle.
There was an exhaustive investigation which sifted though any and all pictures , testimony, evidence, etc
and came to the conclusion
THIS WAS NOT A CONSPIRACY!!!
@@BrianMcHenrySoftwareYou sound very naive.. keep thinking that the medias are telling the truth… stop throwing conspiracy!!!!! Have you heard of James Andanson or Eric Petel??
Of course they were ambushed. Unidentified people shot bullets at the wheels from the bridge
@@sabrinag4512 Please stop with the silly postings...our crash reconstruction was based on facts...FACTS!..not garbage collected from click bait websites with garbage information. Send me facts and verifiable information (links to FACTUAL INFORMATION not silly click bait garbage) and i might consider reviewing what you send but STOP spewing forth drivel...ENOUGH!
@@sabrinag4512 dont be silly.
🙏
Noone thought having pillars like that in the middle of the roadway with no protection wouldnt be problematic?
In the US the lawyers would have sued whomever was in charge and their would be a barrier to redirect errant vehicles
In France they still have nothing in front of those pillars
But of course no other tragedies there so guess they dont feel a need
For more info see
www.mchenrysoftware.com/board/viewtopic.php?t=1304
It was supposed to belong to one of the papparozzy.
The car was a major problem...it had been in a major rollover crash and was almost completely rebuilt. The car was known to behave erratically and drivers did not think it was right. Her driver was probably drunk, Princess Diana was not wearing a seatbelt...she was also sitting in the seat where the least forces acted during the rapid deceleration of impact and the subsequent rotation across the two lanes....A working auto-tensioning seatbelt, if buckled, would have saved her life and probably everyone else in the defective car.
Not sure on the pre-crash rollover rebuild. Please send link to reputable source:did that come out in the Uk inquiry? If not its probably hyped BS.
And as far as survival, had they all had seat belts on they had ‘a best chance’ at survival but not guaranteed (especially the front seats with airbags and not having the rear seat unbelted passengers loading them after bad deployment)
BUT
a 50+ mph speed change is very high and can cause aortal separation, etc and is not guaranteed survival)
You are correct that in an offset collision seated location relative to the line of the collision force may be different due to rotation of the vehicle. But not that much
However In response I may post up the acceleration at each location to the thread “acceleration at locations other than CG” for a hypothetically similar crash. See this thread www.mchenrysoftware.com/board/viewtopic.php?p=2968#p2968
@@BrianMcHenrySoftware Very interesting and highly technical...I give my students the analogy of Kepler's Law of planetary orbits to describe the relative decelerations and "swept areas" during a violent action in the same short time period. Stapp survived deceleration from 632mph to zero in around two seconds surviving approx .45 g force at commence of water brake deceleration.
Many sources, all reliable will confirm car's history..it was stolen in Paris and crashed, written off by insurance, subsequently bought by a mechanic and repaired. Other drivers for Etoile limousines have stated the car was difficult to handle at speeds over 45 km/h.
@@Warpedsmac In a search for sources most seem conspiracy theory 'news' sources, none from legitimate news sources. Did the 'rolled over totaled vehicle' issue ever come up in the UK inquiry? if so please send any links.
On the DeltaV by position:
Excellent observation! Had not addressed that! so...I did an evaluation of a similar angled offset crash and see that the RR location is the least DeltaV (41.9 MPH) whereas most other locations are 50 MPH or greater (for CG approximately 50 MPH...i need to reload our actual crash reconstruction simulation from 1998, it was on a mini computer (PCs were not very powerful in 1998!)
And for ANY DeltaV survival is never guaranteed but don't think comparisons with the Stapp test is appropriate...but will give that some thought (water decelleration and 4 point harness, etc.)
For a summary of the DeltaVs etc please see www.mchenrysoftware.com/board/viewtopic.php?p=2968#p2968
This video needs to be viewed by many. Perhaps then, all the crazy conspiracy theories would stop. The French authorities questioned the driver of this white Fiat Uno, and instructed him NOT to speak to British Authorities.
There were witnesses who saw the Uno, entering the tunnel from the slip road, and exiting the tunnel. The car exited the tunnel, moving side to side. The driver was adjusting the rear view mirror, and there was a large dog on the back-seat. When the man was questioned, the Uno had been resprayed red. He said it had been resprayed the day before the accident, but changed his statement to say it had been resprayed after the accident. His own father said he woke his other son up during the night, and the car was sprayed just hours after the accident, where a white Uno had been seen just five miles away.
British authorities requested he answer questions, and attend the inquest, but he refused many times. He could not be forced to cooperate with our authorities, as he is a French national. The man, Le Van Thanh has said he never wants to speak about it again; that it's over. All this information is in the public domain. My questions are, why did the French authorities want this hushed up? Is this why there was supposedly no CCTV footage? All this could have been resolved years ago. The attitude towards the monarchy changed forever, which could have been avoided. None of this changes the fact that Henri Paul was driving too fast, and lost control after clipping the Uno, but it goes a long way to explain why there was so much controversy over the alcohol level blood tests. Maybe he wasn't over the limit at all, and it was just a tragic accident. Better to blame a dead man, than involve the living; which could have caused international tension.
the fact the identity of the 'uno driver' is only recently coming out (i don't believe it was a part of the inquiry)
You added a couple conspiracy theories which i find issue with:
You mention "British authorities requested he answer questions, and attend the inquest, but he refused many times" please post a link to a source for this information?
You mention that the French police allegedly covered up the identity of the driver? (I do have issue that simply spray painting a car red should not have hidden the car since car color is part of registration? at least in US it is! but how many white Unos were registered in France at the time? and did they track down every one? (i doubt it!))
You also mention CCTV: the ONLY CCTV cameras were security cameras at businesses near the tunnel and they did not capture anything so no conspiracy about cameras erased, etc.
It was a tragic crash, and had they had barriers in front of the posts? had he not been speeding?
There simply is NO WAY the Uno driver could have timed when to enter to cause interaction with the Mercedes and KNOWN it would run the car into a post.
A tragic event but high profile crashes always bring out the conspiracy theories...
We are living in the #AgeofDisinformation
where any and every crazy theory can find support and reinforcement on the web
@@BrianMcHenrySoftware - I am not saying that it was planned. I am agreeing it was just a tragic accident. With regards to CCTV, the camera at the entrance of the tunnel recorded someone else speeding 15 minutes before the accident. Here is a link to some information on the driver. He was part of the French inquiries, the same year of the accident:
www.standard.co.uk/hp/front/owner-of-white-fiat-uno-refuses-to-give-evidence-at-diana-inquest-6610213.html
@@Jomanka100 thanks for the link. Strange the driver was not produced to testify at least to the French police (Is it not a crime to leave the scene of a crash in France?).
Let me know any links on the CCTV particularly that a camera collected information 15 min before the crash but not of the crash (where exactly was the camera located, did it record and store or simply a monitor, etc...the crash was in 1997 so technology not that sophisticated and resolution poor)
it was a tragic event. It was a high profile event. It is surprising there was not full cooperation between the French and UK governements
@Barbara Nannucci I repeat my response to your other post:
IT WAS NOT AN ASSASINATION! PLEASE STOP SPEWING FORTH CONSPIRACY DRIVEL.
In this #AgeofDisinformation it is probably a waste of my time to respond to you however i will point out a MAJOR flaw in your #ConspiracyTheories. Please watch the whole 8 minutes as i am simply repeating what i said in the interview:
Had a motorcyclist been 'immediately behind her car' How did he stop? How did he avoid crashing/losing control without leaving any skid marks? On a motorcycle to stop from 70+ MPH takes TIME (he has to Perceive the car in front is going to crash and then react/respond and BRAKE so the there is a DISTANCE and hard evasive braking LEAVES MARKS!! AND more than likely the rider bike would have crashed also...
Had he been behind her he would have crashed into the vehicle since the Mercedes crashed into a post at 70 MPH and then spun around ACROSS BOTH LANES!!
So your theory/conspiracy is flawed.
Certainly trying to escape the paparazzi motivated the DUI driver to speed and lose control of the vehicle and unfortunately crash into post #13 (and again had their been a simple guardrail in front of the posts it would not have been a fatal crash)
Also how did these assassins KNOW the route the Mercedes would take? (if you delve deeper you will see he took arbitrary routes and had decoy vehicles...How did they coordinate their movements to make the DUI driver SPEED and SWERVE and ultimately CRASH?
HOW?
Technology did NOT exist in 1997 to allow the alleged "assassins" to coordinate such an intricate arbitrary scenario
Please take your conspiracy theories to another place on the web.
in this #AgeofDisinformation you can no doubt find others who refuse to accept the arbitrary and tragic crash circumstances
Please go elsewhere to find support for you informed theories.
Whatever became of the elderly French man who was frantically telling a reporter about being just ahead of the accident? A brilliant flash of light in his rearview mirror temporarily blinded him and a few seconds later, a highpowered motorbike with two figures on it sped past him...Have never heard of or seen footage relating to this again...
martians kidnapped him and flew him to the moon?
oh wait no UK special services...James Bond got him!
CMon you are parroting silly conspiracy theories
Please take these silly things elsewhere.
HAD there been ANY truth to your rumor, it would have come out!
It was in the witness statements given. Read John Morgan Paris London Connection - How they murdered Princess Diana. It’s the biggest cover up in the world.
We ask governments in all countries to unite the bridge pillars as high as one or two meters so that if a car hits a bridge support, it can still slide not as badly as a car crashes into a bridge pillar so that an accident hitting a pillar like what happened to Princess Diana does not happen again, sorry and thank you.
An easier and less expensive solution would be as a minimum to install metal guardrails along the roadway adjacent to bridge supports to redirect the vehicle and avoid these types of crashes.
There are a LOT of bridges without any protective devices for the bridge supports.
See www.mchenrysoftware.com/board/viewtopic.php?p=2793#p2793
It could have been avoided.. Seems silly mistake by driver.. Secondly, medical help seemed delayed and not upto the mark..
yes it should have been avoided...however things like that happen every day...speed, DUI, crashing into immovable objects (the unprotected posts)
Now as far as medical response...
if you read the inquest info on that you will read that she coded a few times while at the scene and so they worked to stabilize her before moving her
Also in France they don't speed through the streets (like they do in the US) to get to a hospital (they prefer to avoid another crash)
Main point is there was not delay or problem with the medical help.
A 50+ MPH impact speed where the vehicle slammed into a post and so she then slammed into the back of the passenger seat probably caused her internal organs to fail/separate/etc...sorry to be graphic however it was a horrific crash..at 50+ MPH speed change it is is a possibly survivable crash but only possibly...most times that amount of speed change causes death.
Yeah she was alive when they got to the scene. So sad.
It will remain unsolved
It is and has been solved for a long time.
You (and others) simply refuse to accept scientific crash reconstruction findings and conclusions.
t doesn't mean that it hasn't been solved!
It just demonstrates that you (and others) simply refuse to accept the findings.
In summary...Drunk driving, speeding, failure to control the vehicle, not wearing seatbelts, lack of protective barriers in front of the bridge supports, these are the WHY the tragedy happened.
For more info see www.mchenrysoftware.com/board/viewtopic.php?t=1304
Did the car flip to squash the roof like that.
roof wasn't squashed...the roof WAS cut off by emergency personnel but no rollover or damage to roof like that see picture on this thread (and additional information on the crash)
www.mchenrysoftware.com/board/viewtopic.php?p=2190#p2190
@@BrianMcHenrySoftware thankyou McHenry. I didn't think so, but All of time was spent trying to release her..France doesn't have that emergency medical team that .can attend to trapped people like Britain does?they climb in and administer immediately. I know I am just flapping my fingertip .
@@lorrainepollock4997 i agree...had it happened in UK or USA
1st there probably would have been a barrier along the roadway so they wouldn't have hit a post (merely scraped along the barrier)
2nd emergency vehicles don't run wild in the streets in France like they do in UK/US or that's what i hear as many have wondered why the emergency services weren't rush rush rush.
...but an added delay was that she did code more than once at the scene (severe internal injuries due to the severe impact with the post) and guess the emergency people wanted to stabilize her in the ambulance before moving her from scene...
and no problem with questions/comments
but i like your term...flappin yer fingertips...thanks! I'm gonna use that!
...In this #AgeofDisinformation sooooo many folks flap their fingertips...
No the firemen trampled all over it and this was the image used to shock the world. There are photos which show Diana’s side was relatively undamaged. There are also photos of her sitting in the back grimacing in pain , very much conscious and alive. Plan A was to kill her outright in the crash and Plan B to finish her off in the ambulance if she survived. It was a highly sophisticated assassination.
All the photos released are of after the roof had been cut off, everyone removed and the roof dropped back down. No roof damage from the wreck, they just couldn't fit the roof back onto the posts which normally hold it in place.
The more so called Diana crash 'reconstructions' I watch, the more I believe this was a cleverly devised assassination. Yes, the Mercedes was speeding, but why would you lose control so violently after a mere glancing contact with another vehicle and almost driving in a straight line? Something sinister almost certainly caused the driver to lose control of the car, once inside the tunnel, in my view.
ENOUGH ALREADY!
simply because you believe something does not give it any weight aside from to you
Believe what you choose to believe
watch the program...look at the evidence
Read our notes on things
www.mchenrysoftware.com/board/viewtopic.php?t=1304
THIS WAS NOTHING MORE THAN A TRADGEDY DUE TO SPEEDING, DUI, UNBELTED OCCUPANTS AND A LACK OF SAFETY DEVICE IN FRONT OF THE BRIDGE PILLARS
READ
Science was behind our crash reconstruction and science explains that the intoxicated driver was speeding too fast while making the left hand turn on the downward slope into the tunnel trying to escape Paparazzi and as a result of the minor clip of the Uno overreacted and lost control of the vehicle and slammed into bridge pillar #13.
Shouldn't have happened
I thought they did find the Uno.it was being fixed.
geezum...the silly conspiracy theories which accompany anything of high profile...like in Dragnet..lets stick to the facts...just the facts maam...just the facts...what you say is gobbly goop and has NO basis in fact
@@VK-qe7if If the passengers had been wearing seat belts, it would have probably saved their lives. TWO people in the rear seats not wearing seat belts. Work out the odds.
@@BrianMcHenrySoftware Well a former agent for MI6 actually saw Henri Pauls MI6 file. Fact.
@@iriscollins7583 You may be right about that Iris, especially if Diana had been wearing her belt, but I don't think a belt would have saved Dodi because the corner of the roof of the car his side suffered extreme damage in the crash, and caved in on him killing him instantly. 😢😢
@@VK-qe7if yea...of COURSE he had a file.. everyone around the Princess would have a file since Mi6 provided security for Prince William and Prince Harry so had to keep tabs on who the Princess interacted with etc...
please find other forums for debunked conspiracy theories...ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!
GIVE IT A REST!
No sound
check your sound...sometimes default is to start muted (pause the video and look at bottom by the pause button)
This guy driving was trying to impress his boss with driving skills which were poor actually
yes i agree
it is never a good idea to try to outrun other vehicles
particularly motorcycles
And being drunk he should not even have been driving!
These types of tragedies happen a lot every day on the world highways
When high profile people are involved it hopefully sends a clear message out:
1) don't' drink and drive
2) don't speed
3) wear your seat belt!
In Westminster Abbey, beneath a gold canopy, well hidden from our unworthy eyes, a professed adulterer is to be anointed with holy oil with his beloved mistress-become-wife, now proudly watching on, beside him. ... Somewhat tarnished, this besmircher and betrayer of the Princess of Wales, thinks that everything is now hunky-dory and fine and dandy. - He believes that the entire world will consider him the Defender of the Faith and the Supreme Governor of the Church of England.
Allow this prospect, Your Majesty, our noble Queen; and all your undoubted dedication and diligence of 70 years would sadly dissolve definitively into nothing; becoming completely null and void. - And the doors would firmly slam shut on the justly proud House of Windsor forever.
cmon...Prince Charles isn't the first, nor the last, married man or woman to be an adulterer...
You've penned a somewhat witty paragraph but not sure if in any way related to the unfortunate tragedy this youtube video presents.
i may need to remove your post.
But as i decide...may i remind you...
Wasn't the Church of England created because a certain prior King couldn't get a divorce
(and guess in addition to new church he started the 'off with her head' way to end a marriage too a few times...
but also the King created a new church to circumvent the power of the Pope!
(and Popes are humans too! Michelangelo was a bastard child of a Pope, eh?)
Anyhow the pomp and circumstance of the Royals shall continue
Luminous Raven Lovely use of the formidable English language. Thank You.