TBH, I always used to ignore Mufti Aby Layth's video whenever it popped on my screen cause I never took him seriously for his appearance. But once I started listening to him, I never stopped. He has a heart of gold. Now, I always enjoy listening to him. Respect to Mufti from Bangladesh.
@@rehmanahmed7742 Islam is the only truth. Some Muslims are having such crisis is because of lack of knowledge. First, they themselves don't study the religion with the mashaykhs and second, the doubts that infiltrate their minds by the atheist preachers. The first command of Allah Azzawajal to humans were "Iqra" means "Read" and that we don't do.
Alhamdullilah you bring up some very valid points brother Mufti Layth. I am a convert from the early 90's and I remember Sahih Bukari being pushed on me and others heavily. Thank you and may Allah bless you for challenging certain norms which have probably caused great damage. I really feel on some level Allah has guided me towards you. Not to say I agree with everything ☺️ but you are helping to clear my heart and mind of long held doubts about some of the things I have read in these books.
@Hail Almighty Lord Zeus he explained this, in a two hour video on the age of Aisha. If you actually listened, he is AGAINST many of the things in Bukhari as he considers many hadith false.
@@thepoorsultan5112 so he's deceiving us saying ayesha r.a. was NOT 9 years of age? I obviously do not agree with everything he says, but some of the things he says makes sense. Allah calls us to use our intellect in the Qur'an. And I defiantly so not belive EVERYTHING in bukhari
Mufti Abu Layth reminds of a very apt expression and if anyone can just go past that initial "spiky hair, goaty..."cover of his,..an enlightening world opens up. Ma-sha-Allah. ...."don't judge a book by its cover", in his case is apt. Personally, I like his random laughter outbursts, interspersed with his 'gujerati' expressions.....priceless.
Whenever I see this Mufti I see still there is hope for muslims to survive. Everything he says must be taken seriously and followed.He is bringing the real Islam to the world and debunking the superstitions that have come to harm Islam.
Who is Farabry? What is his bio? never heard of him Mufti saab. This info is so intriguing, its so facinating to learn the hidden stuff for many centuries. Wow! thanks to youtube for bring forth all this stuff through the honest and learned mufti( stand alone scholar) you not the puppet scholar. Please start an online course to teach us the the history of hadith and its authenticity. 🤟😁🙏👌👍
Salam Mufti. Is there any way to invite shaykh Akram Nadwi on MindTrap? I'd love to hear a discussion between you two. You can bring up this topic as well. :)
The learned scholar Javed Ahmad Ghamidhi , has better understanding and view point about ahadith. His explanations about what ahadith actually is how to incorporate them in your understanding is what I recommend to others. If distinguished sahaba like Umar al khattab and Abu bakr would not quote any hadith unless it was absolutely vital for it to be uttered( for administrative purposes and clarification of an important issue) who are we to even discuss them. They were extremely careful for one an only reason, that if anything they quoted was not what exactly Prophet s.a.w said, it would constitute a slander against him. What and how would they feel when they would confront him in hereafter, what answer will they give. Personally i fear for all these moulwis and Hadith scholars who teach these dubious and false sayings without a thought about what they are doing.
I agree. I can work with this. Plus, people have started worshipping ahadith. They have abandoned the Quran unfortunately. Surah Furqan verse 30 “And the Messenger said, ‘O my MAINTAINER, indeed my people have taken this Quran as Deserted.”
@@guardingsoul6652 yeah I agree... since salafi movement started in 90s... People started to regard shahih Bukhari as 100% authentic just like Quran and Bukhari himself started to almost become prophet that free from err
@@ARKAN9765 ya all gotta understand imam bukhari simply collected the sahi hadiths.. he just COLLECTED.. the hadiths belong to prophet when we say bukhari is perfect we mean hadiths.. every hadith is sahih and it is all graded sahih after intense research.. we can no follow islam without hadiths.. Quran doesnt teach us how to pray namaz
Love to watch every video of yours mufti. If all mulla n shaikh come to one table then they not gonna get halwa. Means no more sheerni lol n dis 1 very biiiig problem. Bless u mufti
Jonathon Brown wrote a book about the canonization of bukhari, how reluctant certain schools were to accept it. I only skimmed through it. He's a clever cookie though. I'd love to see that conversation. I think the main reason people don't want bukhari to be critisised is because it has been the held up as the best hadith collection ever for Sunni's. If if bukhari is a crapshoot, then every hadith is. You either gotta become your own scholar, start again completely from scratch, or become Quran-only. Either way that gives people massive anxiety.
Dan Brubaker wrote a book (textual critism of Quran). There are 4000 instances of changes to the Quran manuscripts which refutes the Quranic claim that God preserved the Quran from change czcams.com/video/1Ge8wEYkyIs/video.html Jay Smith explains how the Quran was compiled from AD600-1985. All the variations, changes and standardizations from Original to the King Fahd version in 1985 czcams.com/video/3nXzi-_WTdI/video.html Dan Gibson explains the original location of Kaaba was in Petra, Jordan and then moved to Mecca by Ibn Zubair after the 2st Islamic Civil war(Abbasid vs Ummayad) 50th min - Year 70AH in Islam is just 1 page as opposed to entire chapter. “The history of Al Tabari“ Implies the information on change from Petra to Mecca was censored/deleted. www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/mecca czcams.com/video/QGLWh5Cd-xo/video.html
But aren't the narrations in Bukhari found in other sources? What is the issue with the book not having been transmitted authentically, what is lost exactly?
Nothing missing .... the highest level of hadith .... some hadith listed as Golden hadith' meaning only 3 link's in the chain of narration going back to the prophet saw himself .... still they reject Bukhari ... next they will reject the Quran , they are under cover Shia's in my opinion not Maliki's .... because Imam Malik being the pious man he was would reject these lost soul's
@@786qad This is the most idiotic and hateful comment i've read. So if hitler said 1+1 is 2 would it be wrong just because the truth came from hitler? You should stop your hateful salafi brainwash and think for a moment and be honest to yourself.
The Farabri argument applies only to hadiths [ahadith] related in Sahih Bukhari and nowhere else. It fails for Bukhari hadiths [ahadith] found also in other collections.
What supersedes even the farabari argument is if a Hadith in either Bukarhi or even in other Hadith collections + Bukarhi goes against reason, an Islamic principle or Quran.
I think what this shows is that even the “most” authentic book can not necessarily be taken at face value and if Bukhari can’t, then what to say of the other kitabs of Hadith?
None of these replies negates my original premise. For the *Farabri argument* to hold any weight, one would have to examine only those hadith found in Bukhari and nowhere else.
@@Hakim-it8fn I’m just saying generally, the argument of Hadith contradicting reason or an Islamic principal or Quran means that , that hadith cannot be trusted. I’m not going into this whole authenticity of Bukarhi, that’s outta my pay grade lol, I’ll leave that to Hadith scholars like mufti.
very interesting.. Imam Malik differentiated sunnah and hadiths (stories, news, one-on-one transmintted info). almost answering my doubt about the so called hadiths collected and written 250 years after our beloved prophet pbuh died. very difficult to defend many hadiths in sahih bukhari
There is some truth to this but it is more complex. Imam Malik (Raheem Allah) was a person of sunnah and narrations but transmitted them with care and necessity.
I believe he would have become the most followed islamic speaker if he wears like all other shaikhs. Indeed he is very knowledgeable but yes I disagree with him on few things. May God bless mufti sab. ❤🇮🇳
The only thing that is 💯 is Quran dats the uncredited speech of Allah anything else could have mistakes not 💯 as far as I was taught and Allah knows best
I was debating with another Muslim and they kept asking for proof but ONLY from Bukhari. Like bro, Bukhari is just a book like any other but you're treating it like something holy and asking hadiths ONLY from Bukhari.
Shias and Sunni's are brother's thank you for this video very informative brother keep up the good work and highlight the truth but please no need to debate with any individuals on any ideology or may I say religion because it's a waste of time not even single individual who could claim that he or she have ever seen that any individuals who admits his or her defeat if some individuals have seen it please do send me the link were I could research by myself without being biased towards any ideology or may I say religion so now and always will be up to individual's to research by themselves without being biased towards any ideology or may I say religion like always all the best to Muslim and Atheism love from Pakistan 🇵🇰
You should debate people like Adnan Rashid muhammad hijab etc.. these people do more harm to Islam than defending it. All to protect hadiths no matter what
You remind them of that good looking kid in school who seems as if he doesn't care about school but gets 90s and 100s then people are like damn and his haters get extra jelly.
@@ydw8405 why cherry pick? Why can’t you dump the ones which demeans Rasulullah and stop justifying it? That’s one of Mufti’s main arguments. If there is a Hadith which states he SAW) is forgetful pro Bukharis are quick to justify it with the Ayah Ana basharun mithlukum but ignore another Ayah which says wa ma yantiqu anil hawa.
Mufti why don't you honestly tell the people about the Bukhari manuscript of Abu Ibrahim al-Nasafi, on this version, Abu Sulayman Al-Khattabi (d.386) [Bukhari died 256] made a commentary on Bukhari, which is still available and sold TODAY. The ahadith in it are identical with the one of Firabri. Not even talking about the manuscript of Bukhari of Tahir al-Nasafi, Jurjani, Abu Talha al-Bazdawi, Hammad ibn Shakir and so on. So that Firabri is the only narrator is a lie 🤣
Dan Brubaker wrote a book (textual critism of Quran). There are 4000 instances of changes to the Quran manuscripts which refutes the Quranic claim that God preserved the Quran from change czcams.com/video/1Ge8wEYkyIs/video.html Jay Smith explains how the Quran was compiled from AD600-1985. All the variations, changes and standardizations from Original to the King Fahd version in 1985 czcams.com/video/3nXzi-_WTdI/video.html Dan Gibson explains the original location of Kaaba was in Petra, Jordan and then moved to Mecca by Ibn Zubair after the 2st Islamic Civil war(Abbasid vs Ummayad) 50th min - Year 70AH in Islam is just 1 page as opposed to entire chapter. “The history of Al Tabari“ Implies the information on change from Petra to Mecca was censored/deleted. www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/mecca czcams.com/video/QGLWh5Cd-xo/video.html
Mufti Layth i amve found u among the v few scholars with not only amazing knowledge n wisdom to go beyond the traditional interpretation n beliefs which has harmed islam more than doing any good. Mostly musilim blindly follows the scholars of their sects who blindly follows imams or older scholars n they have heavily relied on hadiths which has ambiguity n dobeious reliability in many cases. Unfortunately often hadith has been the reason to poluted n deviated from the original message of Allaha. Like many other religions the misunderstanding n changes in the religions has made religion corrupted n irrelevant to modern times. Much more energy need to be given in understanding Quran in new prespective.
Mufti, my son watch you regularly and he gets delighted when you mock mullaism. Trust me, we need more of you. Request. Please bring little change (NOT MODESTY )in your attire. We need more of you. Little change please. We are sick people. We still judge on the basis of self-imposed code of uniform. We need more people to watch and listen to you.
@@c5quared626 @C 5quared what belief are they selling out? Wearing earring is a belief? To not joke around in matters like the christchurch incident is violating their belief?
Would have to say that by dressing in an approachable manner actually makes him more authentic. He establishes his credibility on his arguments as one should.
Erm...mufti saab you yourself said you don't want a formal academic debate. You want people to come into your house for a 'discussion'...of course in these formats the louder voice will overpower a more softly spoken voice just by sheer noise pollution. Also as a guest one is more likely to be extra polite..
So what? He just doesn't want people to act with childish, ridiculous behaviour like Asrar Rashid. You can come in for a discussion, without formal itty-bitty nitpicky rules, and you can still lay forth logical arguments, on both sides. Which is what mufti is doing.
@@texan4548 He should agree to an academic debate following a structured format chaired by someone both agree to..he claims to be a scholar, he should behave as such.
See guys, this is why it is SO IMPORTANT to listen to people like Mufti above who really is well-read and learned in his area. Because, I'll give you an example 'off the page' but will demonstrate how devastating, completely false ideas and 'spun' narratives can be. To this day, you will find most leading Oxford academics say that Plato taught in FAVOR of pederasty. To this day, big league names like Stephen Fry say the same kind of thing. But it's completely false. At the time of Plato writing his dialogues, it was against the law made by Athens, to say ANYTHING against such perversion, BECAUSE half the Athenian Senate were pederasts put in as puppets by Persian wealthy interests - and the penalty for saying anything or teaching against homosexuality was death. So Plato wrote AGAINST such things, but he did so using euphemisms and very subtle explanations that he 'put into the mouth' of his character Socrates. Oxford was set up to COUNTER the Roman Catholic academic domination of Europe at the time, and thus, Oxford 'Dons' were all celibate by the rules of Oxford University, in order to attain the same 'moral respectability' (supposedly) of the celibate monks of Catholic academia at the time. Except, the Oxford guys were all homosexuals! So they 'appropriated' the euphemistic writings of Plato to try and maintain he supported their lifestyle when in fact he taught the exact reverse but used euphemistic Greek language to avoid being prosecuted by the Athenian State. And Oxford has gotten away with the lie ever since they spawned it. And now, no one much dares to challenge the Oxford false narrative because of their 'cache' and 'reputation' as learned academics. In fact, they're just political liars. This shows just how far such propaganda can go when it remains unchallenged and unchecked by those who actually know the truth. How much of modern-era Islam is dubious because of these same effects?
Can you talk with Muslim lantern Mohammed Ali about that. He’s also a smart well knowledged guy. And not a screammachine like Mohammed hijab. Joins his stream as a random and maybe you can open Muslims minds with teachings like bukhari does.
Mufti, you are running in to the same treatment other critics of Islam are also experiencing, they think they know better, but don't. And the only way they respond is acting in denial and running.....
monumental work has gone into creating the hadith collections and this work has been verified by generations of scholars ever since anyone that throws away the monumental work done to gather and grade the hadith collections is probably not a muslim everything in the hadith collections is not claimed to be true or reliable, the hadith that have been graded to be sahih are the ones that we need to rely on
The ahul-Hadith have always had a problem with Imam Malik and the school of Medina. Malik understood Hadith to be relative to the Amal of Medina , instead of hadith dogmatism. Malik’s Muwatta breaks this paradigm of ultimate authority of sahih hadith on the believer. Bukhari rates the most sahih isnad to be the Golden chain of Malik on Nafi and ibn Umar... Malik brings these chains and says we don’t follow this. The most authoritative scholar in his time , the one who inherited a tradition from the grand children of the Sahaba warned the ummah about taking your deen from these one on one narrations. But each to his own....
Dude, you repeating the same old argument, without actually knowing things. What 'monumental work', exactly? Do you really believe one man knew 700,000 hadith and their chains, by heart, and analysed then one by one? It's an invented story, if you know even simple maths. And that he started collecting hadith 230 years after the Prophet? And who are YOU to call people non-muslim? Since when has doubting hadith become a reason for takfir? And do you know that many modern scholars have revised their classifications of hadith? Listen to the two bukharigate videos, and see which arguments you can *actually* counter. I bet you don't know even 1% of what he talks about in those videos. And most 'sheikhs' around the world don't know either.
@@texan4548 The hadith collectors that we know about the most spent their entire life in this pursuit. The prophet guided people for mere 23 years, there can't be 700,000 distinct hadith. There could however be a few 100,000 chains that they found where one person could provide more than one chain and record everything. And then they are analysed we find that many hadith are simply repeating over and over again from different transmissions. Thus we get 1 hadith from maybe hundreds of transmitters. The science of hadith is of fundamental importance to the Muslim faith. Ultimately everything we know about the Prophet is through chain of transmissions, including the Qur'an itself. The hadith collection has never been accepted on a dogmatic basis, there is a reason it is called the "science" of hadith. Those that reject the hadith will soon reject the Qur'an and then existance of God, this is the inevitable end of such people.
The saying of Medina was “that no one gives fatwa while Malik is in Medina” ...Imam Malik, the master muhadith of his time rejected “sahih hadith”..did he leave the Qur’an and God?
@@Lonzetta_3laama scholars have discussed at length over course of many generations how to grade the hadith. Those hadith that are agreed upon as being sahih cannot be rejected. Their rejection is not going to render a person nonMuslim but is certainly a serious issue. Many scholars have rejected sahih hadith due to them being a singular narration on a subject or perhaps they have been deemed to be in violation with other many hadith or Qur'an (possible in case of abrogation for example) The point is that one of the things that have arisen in this age is hadith rejection where people even go as far as declaring the hadith to be a conspiracy against Islam. When we cherry pick evidence, we can easily make such claims.
Love how people just blind follow . Pick and chose flavour of the month and eventually come to think yeh if this guy says its all wrong it must be because he has a youtube channel. Absolute clowns and then they end up rejecting everything 🤣. Lets follow the Quran only. Instead of united the muslims lets just divide everyone.
And you're on the right path, because you believe the prophet married a six year old, and Moses chased a rock naked? He isn't against EVERY hadith in Bukhari, he just assesses them critically, and finds many of them very suspect. As do many other scholars.
@@taptronics 800 years ago ... and Bukhari was world famous in his own day, he debated with famous scholars from Medina and was regarded as the Master of hadith for is photographic memory. From when kids are born we learn of Bukhari , we ourself try to challenge him but more you read the higher Bukhari's respect elevates in our hearts. Read his life and his compilation of works before you listen to this goat
*ADNAN RASHID* is the only one that has the knowledge on this that could debate you. He knows that the Quran itself is technically a book of Hadith (most don't even know this). HE knows and how these collections 'crosses into' Al-Hadith. He also has specific knowledge that is *rarely discussed.* But for Bukhari specifically *I HEARD* there are language issues that suggest Urdu is *MORE ACCURATE* and preserved than the Arabic. Theres also large libraries *specifically in Urdu* regarding hadiths that are unique to Pakistan (I heard). Actually, think about it, one of the OLDEST masjids *VERIFIED* by GPS Qibla direction is in Pakistan. *Farid Responds* might be willing, but I don't think he has the knowledge to do it.. and it would be opening a can of worms for him. Any ex-Quran-only person would be able to do it. Actually, ANYONE who seriously digs into the Hadiths, you will eventually reach a point where it crosses into Quran etc. and it's like opening Pandora's Box - it could change your whole world around and *perspective on Islam itself.* Many its for the BETTER though and it will bring them closer to the Quran, Prophet and and Companions. The truth sets you free. And that's the place where Abu Layth is. And thats why they are hostile towards him. Remember that Peacemaking gives a greater blessing than all charity, fasting etc... or something like that.. can't remember the hadith. ;)
I HEARD there are language issues that suggest Urdu is MORE ACCURATE and preserved than the Arabic. Theres also large libraries specifically in Urdu regarding hadiths that are unique to Pakistan (I heard). Actually, think about it, one of the OLDEST masjids VERIFIED
Whether some are sahih or not... Since majority of ahadhith in bukhari are sahih, traditionally call this as sahih bukhari... This kind of discussion is not need of the hour we live in.. better avoid this kind of discussions... There are many productive things we need to discuss on. May allah guide us
Bukhari will always be world famous till judgement day. Those who know and read his life have absolute respect and nothing less. You can enjoy your 200 comments and a few subscribers .... one video on you tube of Bukhari hits 20 million views .... who's status has Allah elevated? .... get well soon brv.
St. Paul of Christianity is even more famous, does that mean God elevated him? Paul abolished the Torah and said the devil is "the god of this world" in 2 Corinthians 4:4 and lies bluntly about Hebrew in Galatians 3:16, yet Christians still believe he's a great man! Simply put, you're using a bandwagon fallacy to establish Bukhari, I mean Farabri👍
Who are you to say? And have you listened to his arguments? None of those wahhabis even dare debate him! Do you not know the gravity of calling people disbelievers?
@@illuminatethepath404 go to a channel called sunni defense and go to playlists and click mufti abu layth. See the refutations and you tell me who's running.
@@usmanuddin1366 🤣 those ain’t no “refutations” there are merely shoving their one sided views and claiming they are *the* views and therefore mufti is “wrong” 🤣🤣. Go on Twitter and see Farid coward away from a MindTrap with mufti, he can’t stand the actual facts.
@@illuminatethepath404 what are the facts? Bukharis ahadith which can be found in different chains in different books are wrong? Even if bukhari is gone, the hadiths still exist. Why do you attack bukhari? What's the use in it?
@@usmanuddin1366 No one said Bukarhi has to be gone, and the facts are in muftis Bukarhi gate videos, something gangu teli (Farid) hasn’t responded to and is chickening out from coming to his MindTrap to have a discussion, go DM Farid if he’s got the answers as you claim to come destroy this mufti if it’s so easy on his MindTrap 😂😂🤣🤣🤣
@@__Amira__ Allsh said, whatever the prophet gives, take it and whatever he prohibits, refrain from it. Hadith is what the prophet gave us so we need to accept it
TBH, I always used to ignore Mufti Aby Layth's video whenever it popped on my screen cause I never took him seriously for his appearance. But once I started listening to him, I never stopped. He has a heart of gold. Now, I always enjoy listening to him.
Respect to Mufti from Bangladesh.
@fahad alam True brother. Totally agreed. He is the one for the youth who have crisis of faith.
Same here,
@@rehmanahmed7742 Islam is the only truth. Some Muslims are having such crisis is because of lack of knowledge. First, they themselves don't study the religion with the mashaykhs and second, the doubts that infiltrate their minds by the atheist preachers. The first command of Allah Azzawajal to humans were "Iqra" means "Read" and that we don't do.
Alhamdullilah you bring up some very valid points brother Mufti Layth.
I am a convert from the early 90's and I remember Sahih Bukari being pushed on me and others heavily. Thank you and may Allah bless you for challenging certain norms which have probably caused great damage. I really feel on some level Allah has guided me towards you.
Not to say I agree with everything ☺️ but you are helping to clear my heart and mind of long held doubts about some of the things I have read in these books.
mufti is deceiving u
@Hail Almighty Lord Zeus he explained this, in a two hour video on the age of Aisha.
If you actually listened, he is AGAINST many of the things in Bukhari as he considers many hadith false.
@@thepoorsultan5112 I think Mufti Layth will humorously agree with me when I say "You're giving him too much credit." ☺️
massive respect to you.
@@thepoorsultan5112 so he's deceiving us saying ayesha r.a. was NOT 9 years of age?
I obviously do not agree with everything he says, but some of the things he says makes sense.
Allah calls us to use our intellect in the Qur'an. And I defiantly so not belive EVERYTHING in bukhari
Bukhari is hurting the islam , i have no idea who wrote those books which hv nothing to do with islam
Shouldn’t be afraid to lose ppl
If u speak the truth isn’t that wat the prophet pbuh did always spoke the truth
Mufti Abu Layth reminds of a very apt expression and if anyone can just go past that initial "spiky hair, goaty..."cover of his,..an enlightening world opens up. Ma-sha-Allah. ...."don't judge a book by its cover", in his case is apt. Personally, I like his random laughter outbursts, interspersed with his 'gujerati' expressions.....priceless.
I like that guy احمد bc he actually polite in the end and was listening to Mufti carefully lol good job to both. MUFTI is Lit! xox
Lit lol
Keep doing what you do. U r great
Yeah i know that you are always a decent host for everyone . mashaAllah 🥰
Whenever I see this Mufti I see still there is hope for muslims to survive. Everything he says must be taken seriously and followed.He is bringing the real Islam to the world and debunking the superstitions that have come to harm Islam.
Who is Farabry? What is his bio? never heard of him Mufti saab. This info is so intriguing, its so facinating to learn the hidden stuff for many centuries. Wow! thanks to youtube for bring forth all this stuff through the honest and learned mufti( stand alone scholar) you not the puppet scholar. Please start an online course to teach us the the history of hadith and its authenticity. 🤟😁🙏👌👍
Yes .... We wish thst we could know about Hadith history
Nooo I missed this live stream 😭
Salam Mufti. Is there any way to invite shaykh Akram Nadwi on MindTrap? I'd love to hear a discussion between you two. You can bring up this topic as well. :)
Can someone please quote what Jonathan Brown said in his facebook post? thanks
ORITEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE YOUR DOING IT🤟🏼🤟🏼🤟🏼🤟🏼🤟🏼🤟🏼
The learned scholar Javed Ahmad Ghamidhi , has better understanding and view point about ahadith. His explanations about what ahadith actually is how to incorporate them in your understanding is what I recommend to others. If distinguished sahaba like Umar al khattab and Abu bakr would not quote any hadith unless it was absolutely vital for it to be uttered( for administrative purposes and clarification of an important issue) who are we to even discuss them. They were extremely careful for one an only reason, that if anything they quoted was not what exactly Prophet s.a.w said, it would constitute a slander against him. What and how would they feel when they would confront him in hereafter, what answer will they give. Personally i fear for all these moulwis and Hadith scholars who teach these dubious and false sayings without a thought about what they are doing.
I agree. I can work with this. Plus, people have started worshipping ahadith. They have abandoned the Quran unfortunately.
Surah Furqan verse 30
“And the Messenger said, ‘O my MAINTAINER, indeed my people have taken this Quran as Deserted.”
@@guardingsoul6652 yeah I agree... since salafi movement started in 90s...
People started to regard shahih Bukhari as 100% authentic just like Quran and Bukhari himself started to almost become prophet that free from err
For me he's the greatest scholar today and that too a traditionalist like imaams of the past..
People should definitely read him
@@ARKAN9765 ya all gotta understand imam bukhari simply collected the sahi hadiths.. he just COLLECTED.. the hadiths belong to prophet when we say bukhari is perfect we mean hadiths.. every hadith is sahih and it is all graded sahih after intense research.. we can no follow islam without hadiths.. Quran doesnt teach us how to pray namaz
Love to watch every video of yours mufti. If all mulla n shaikh come to one table then they not gonna get halwa. Means no more sheerni lol n dis 1 very biiiig problem. Bless u mufti
where has this excerpt come from?
@Horus thanks
Farid doesn't wanna debate you because he doesn't wanna get publicly humiliated
I agree many scholars many times knowingly hide or does not go refuting traditions cws it challenges their thoughts n beliefs n sectarian following.
Jonathon Brown wrote a book about the canonization of bukhari, how reluctant certain schools were to accept it. I only skimmed through it. He's a clever cookie though. I'd love to see that conversation.
I think the main reason people don't want bukhari to be critisised is because it has been the held up as the best hadith collection ever for Sunni's. If if bukhari is a crapshoot, then every hadith is. You either gotta become your own scholar, start again completely from scratch, or become Quran-only. Either way that gives people massive anxiety.
Dan Brubaker wrote a book (textual critism of Quran). There are 4000 instances of changes to the Quran manuscripts which refutes the Quranic claim that God preserved the Quran from change
czcams.com/video/1Ge8wEYkyIs/video.html
Jay Smith explains how the Quran was compiled from AD600-1985. All the variations, changes and standardizations from Original to the King Fahd version in 1985
czcams.com/video/3nXzi-_WTdI/video.html
Dan Gibson explains the original location of Kaaba was in Petra, Jordan and then moved to Mecca by Ibn Zubair after the 2st Islamic Civil war(Abbasid vs Ummayad)
50th min - Year 70AH in Islam is just 1 page as opposed to entire chapter. “The history of Al Tabari“ Implies the information on change from Petra to Mecca was censored/deleted.
www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/mecca
czcams.com/video/QGLWh5Cd-xo/video.html
But aren't the narrations in Bukhari found in other sources? What is the issue with the book not having been transmitted authentically, what is lost exactly?
Nothing missing .... the highest level of hadith .... some hadith listed as Golden hadith' meaning only 3 link's in the chain of narration going back to the prophet saw himself .... still they reject Bukhari ... next they will reject the Quran , they are under cover Shia's in my opinion not Maliki's .... because Imam Malik being the pious man he was would reject these lost soul's
The fitnah has started
Not all hadiths in bukhari are present in earlier collections
@@786qad This is the most idiotic and hateful comment i've read. So if hitler said 1+1 is 2 would it be wrong just because the truth came from hitler? You should stop your hateful salafi brainwash and think for a moment and be honest to yourself.
@@786qad takfiring shias and comparing bukhari to kalamullah, whats next akhi?
Hadith is like reading the news paper..both written by humans with there own agenda
@Wazza dan 🤣👌
THIS 💯💯💯
What agenda for Bukhari , we was poor, remained poor, never married to compile hadith? Lol get well soon
@@786qad lmao please donate your eyes if you're not going to use them! Never been better
Not all of them, read Quran 39:17-18
The Farabri argument applies only to hadiths [ahadith] related in Sahih Bukhari and nowhere else. It fails for Bukhari hadiths [ahadith] found also in other collections.
What supersedes even the farabari argument is if a Hadith in either Bukarhi or even in other Hadith collections + Bukarhi goes against reason, an Islamic principle or Quran.
I think what this shows is that even the “most” authentic book can not necessarily be taken at face value and if Bukhari can’t, then what to say of the other kitabs of Hadith?
@@The_Bearded_King loved your MindTrap! Keep up the good work on tik tok and ignore the hate. 👍🏽
None of these replies negates my original premise. For the *Farabri argument* to hold any weight, one would have to examine only those hadith found in Bukhari and nowhere else.
@@Hakim-it8fn I’m just saying generally, the argument of Hadith contradicting reason or an Islamic principal or Quran means that , that hadith cannot be trusted. I’m not going into this whole authenticity of Bukarhi, that’s outta my pay grade lol, I’ll leave that to Hadith scholars like mufti.
Sorry meant to say uncreated spelling mistake sorry guys
very interesting.. Imam Malik differentiated sunnah and hadiths (stories, news, one-on-one transmintted info). almost answering my doubt about the so called hadiths collected and written 250 years after our beloved prophet pbuh died. very difficult to defend many hadiths in sahih bukhari
There is some truth to this but it is more complex. Imam Malik (Raheem Allah) was a person of sunnah and narrations but transmitted them with care and necessity.
Mufti,,,Dr Abdul Majid has a video on youtube called debunking bukharigate,,can you please see it and do a response,, many thanks
I believe he would have become the most followed islamic speaker if he wears like all other shaikhs. Indeed he is very knowledgeable but yes I disagree with him on few things. May God bless mufti sab. ❤🇮🇳
Lol that Thumbnail
The only thing that is 💯 is Quran dats the uncredited speech of Allah anything else could have mistakes not 💯 as far as I was taught and Allah knows best
Salaamualaykum. Right on bro
Wa alaykum assalam
I was debating with another Muslim and they kept asking for proof but ONLY from Bukhari. Like bro, Bukhari is just a book like any other but you're treating it like something holy and asking hadiths ONLY from Bukhari.
You should check modern day debate channel out. That’s the channel were you guys should do the debate moderated by James kunz
Hmm..and i now this think.🤔why.. muslim arab fight each other..🤭🤭.
Salam from indonesia🙏🇲🇨🤗
Mufti Abu Layth is from Pakistan and it‘s not a fight, it‘s a discussion 😁
Salam from Bosnia 🇧🇦, Brother 😁
@Farid Responds
Shias and Sunni's are brother's thank you for this video very informative brother keep up the good work and highlight the truth but please no need to debate with any individuals on any ideology or may I say religion because it's a waste of time not even single individual who could claim that he or she have ever seen that any individuals who admits his or her defeat if some individuals have seen it please do send me the link were I could research by myself without being biased towards any ideology or may I say religion so now and always will be up to individual's to research by themselves without being biased towards any ideology or may I say religion like always all the best to Muslim and Atheism love from Pakistan 🇵🇰
Those Gangutelis are not qualified to debate even Shia. They can only debate David Wood and The Apostate Prophet Ridhwan.
Mufti can you debate David wood please 😂 or some other sheikhs that say this is haram that is haram please I find your perspectives interesting
You should debate people like Adnan Rashid muhammad hijab etc.. these people do more harm to Islam than defending it. All to protect hadiths no matter what
I always said Bhukari is not 100% authentic.
Gangu teli 🤣🤣🤣
Wait who are they talking about?
Farid response
@Hedoro Hedoes 🤣🤣
@@illuminatethepath404 u mean ganguteli
The mufti whupped Jonathan brown??? Damn!
You remind them of that good looking kid in school who seems as if he doesn't care about school but gets 90s and 100s then people are like damn and his haters get extra jelly.
I love your dress code
So, does that mean we should just ignore Sahih Bukhari ? and everything is a lie ?
Yes please
@@imgguru1277 waaw.. and so what reliable hadist should be considered ?
It’s not ALL a lie. It’s a compilation of lies, half truths and truths. Not everything in there is lie.
@@155stw And how are we going to choose ? or just cherry picking the hadists that suits us ?
@@ydw8405 why cherry pick? Why can’t you dump the ones which demeans Rasulullah and stop justifying it? That’s one of Mufti’s main arguments. If there is a Hadith which states he SAW) is forgetful pro Bukharis are quick to justify it with the Ayah Ana basharun mithlukum but ignore another Ayah which says wa ma yantiqu anil hawa.
Mufti why don't you honestly tell the people about the Bukhari manuscript of Abu Ibrahim al-Nasafi, on this version, Abu Sulayman Al-Khattabi (d.386) [Bukhari died 256] made a commentary on Bukhari, which is still available and sold TODAY. The ahadith in it are identical with the one of Firabri.
Not even talking about the manuscript of Bukhari of Tahir al-Nasafi, Jurjani, Abu Talha al-Bazdawi, Hammad ibn Shakir and so on.
So that Firabri is the only narrator is a lie 🤣
Dan Brubaker wrote a book (textual critism of Quran). There are 4000 instances of changes to the Quran manuscripts which refutes the Quranic claim that God preserved the Quran from change
czcams.com/video/1Ge8wEYkyIs/video.html
Jay Smith explains how the Quran was compiled from AD600-1985. All the variations, changes and standardizations from Original to the King Fahd version in 1985
czcams.com/video/3nXzi-_WTdI/video.html
Dan Gibson explains the original location of Kaaba was in Petra, Jordan and then moved to Mecca by Ibn Zubair after the 2st Islamic Civil war(Abbasid vs Ummayad)
50th min - Year 70AH in Islam is just 1 page as opposed to entire chapter. “The history of Al Tabari“ Implies the information on change from Petra to Mecca was censored/deleted.
www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/mecca
czcams.com/video/QGLWh5Cd-xo/video.html
Mufti Layth i amve found u among the v few scholars with not only amazing knowledge n wisdom to go beyond the traditional interpretation n beliefs which has harmed islam more than doing any good. Mostly musilim blindly follows the scholars of their sects who blindly follows imams or older scholars n they have heavily relied on hadiths which has ambiguity n dobeious reliability in many cases. Unfortunately often hadith has been the reason to poluted n deviated from the original message of Allaha. Like many other religions the misunderstanding n changes in the religions has made religion corrupted n irrelevant to modern times. Much more energy need to be given in understanding Quran in new prespective.
Mufti, my son watch you regularly and he gets delighted when you mock mullaism. Trust me, we need more of you. Request. Please bring little change (NOT MODESTY )in your attire. We need more of you. Little change please. We are sick people. We still judge on the basis of self-imposed code of uniform. We need more people to watch and listen to you.
C 5quared 😂
if he lost the earrings and knew when to get serious mufti would have a bigger audience.
@@c5quared626 @C 5quared what belief are they selling out? Wearing earring is a belief? To not joke around in matters like the christchurch incident is violating their belief?
Would have to say that by dressing in an approachable manner actually makes him more authentic. He establishes his credibility on his arguments as one should.
Erm...mufti saab you yourself said you don't want a formal academic debate. You want people to come into your house for a 'discussion'...of course in these formats the louder voice will overpower a more softly spoken voice just by sheer noise pollution. Also as a guest one is more likely to be extra polite..
So what? He just doesn't want people to act with childish, ridiculous behaviour like Asrar Rashid.
You can come in for a discussion, without formal itty-bitty nitpicky rules, and you can still lay forth logical arguments, on both sides.
Which is what mufti is doing.
@@texan4548 He should agree to an academic debate following a structured format chaired by someone both agree to..he claims to be a scholar, he should behave as such.
Openly challenged by hanafi scholars this guy just barks and laughs like the devil ... no etiquette in how to reply.
He read it to 4 scholars in which one was ahmad bin hanbal student of imam jafar e sadiq who was great grandson of hazrat husayn like the 6 imam
Who is farabri
The one and only rawi(narrator) of Bukhari👍
@@justchillin3492 is he abu huraira?
@@aamenahkhan6108 no, he's the dubious figure that transmitted the whole collection of bukhari
See guys, this is why it is SO IMPORTANT to listen to people like Mufti above who really is well-read and learned in his area. Because, I'll give you an example 'off the page' but will demonstrate how devastating, completely false ideas and 'spun' narratives can be.
To this day, you will find most leading Oxford academics say that Plato taught in FAVOR of pederasty. To this day, big league names like Stephen Fry say the same kind of thing.
But it's completely false. At the time of Plato writing his dialogues, it was against the law made by Athens, to say ANYTHING against such perversion, BECAUSE half the Athenian Senate were pederasts put in as puppets by Persian wealthy interests - and the penalty for saying anything or teaching against homosexuality was death. So Plato wrote AGAINST such things, but he did so using euphemisms and very subtle explanations that he 'put into the mouth' of his character Socrates.
Oxford was set up to COUNTER the Roman Catholic academic domination of Europe at the time, and thus, Oxford 'Dons' were all celibate by the rules of Oxford University, in order to attain the same 'moral respectability' (supposedly) of the celibate monks of Catholic academia at the time. Except, the Oxford guys were all homosexuals!
So they 'appropriated' the euphemistic writings of Plato to try and maintain he supported their lifestyle when in fact he taught the exact reverse but used euphemistic Greek language to avoid being prosecuted by the Athenian State. And Oxford has gotten away with the lie ever since they spawned it. And now, no one much dares to challenge the Oxford false narrative because of their 'cache' and 'reputation' as learned academics. In fact, they're just political liars.
This shows just how far such propaganda can go when it remains unchallenged and unchecked by those who actually know the truth. How much of modern-era Islam is dubious because of these same effects?
Mufti intimidating beta bhai jaans, with his muscles 😂🤣
who is RABRI?
FArabri. Muhammad ibn Yusuf al Farabri. He was the most well known of the transmitters of Sahih al Bukhari.
@@seletarroots3258 ok , never heard of this fella.. so whats his story
@@mohammedpatel6543
That he transmitted the whole Sahih Al-Bukhari in its original and unadulterated form.
Man said rabari 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Farabri is the one and only narrator for sahih bukhari
Can you talk with Muslim lantern Mohammed Ali about that. He’s also a smart well knowledged guy. And not a screammachine like Mohammed hijab. Joins his stream as a random and maybe you can open Muslims minds with teachings like bukhari does.
U are driving them crazy all hardcore salafi/ cousin of ISS.... ha ha....
Mufti, you are running in to the same treatment other critics of Islam are also experiencing, they think they know better, but don't. And the only way they respond is acting in denial and running.....
He is not a critic of Islam. He is critical of SOME of the hadith in Bukhari.
are you defending of Buhari
monumental work has gone into creating the hadith collections and this work has been verified by generations of scholars ever since
anyone that throws away the monumental work done to gather and grade the hadith collections is probably not a muslim
everything in the hadith collections is not claimed to be true or reliable, the hadith that have been graded to be sahih are the ones that we need to rely on
The ahul-Hadith have always had a problem with Imam Malik and the school of Medina. Malik understood Hadith to be relative to the Amal of Medina , instead of hadith dogmatism. Malik’s Muwatta breaks this paradigm of ultimate authority of sahih hadith on the believer. Bukhari rates the most sahih isnad to be the Golden chain of Malik on Nafi and ibn Umar... Malik brings these chains and says we don’t follow this. The most authoritative scholar in his time , the one who inherited a tradition from the grand children of the Sahaba warned the ummah about taking your deen from these one on one narrations. But each to his own....
Dude, you repeating the same old argument, without actually knowing things.
What 'monumental work', exactly?
Do you really believe one man knew 700,000 hadith and their chains, by heart, and analysed then one by one?
It's an invented story, if you know even simple maths.
And that he started collecting hadith 230 years after the Prophet?
And who are YOU to call people non-muslim? Since when has doubting hadith become a reason for takfir?
And do you know that many modern scholars have revised their classifications of hadith?
Listen to the two bukharigate videos, and see which arguments you can *actually* counter.
I bet you don't know even 1% of what he talks about in those videos.
And most 'sheikhs' around the world don't know either.
@@texan4548 The hadith collectors that we know about the most spent their entire life in this pursuit.
The prophet guided people for mere 23 years, there can't be 700,000 distinct hadith. There could however be a few 100,000 chains that they found where one person could provide more than one chain and record everything. And then they are analysed we find that many hadith are simply repeating over and over again from different transmissions. Thus we get 1 hadith from maybe hundreds of transmitters.
The science of hadith is of fundamental importance to the Muslim faith. Ultimately everything we know about the Prophet is through chain of transmissions, including the Qur'an itself.
The hadith collection has never been accepted on a dogmatic basis, there is a reason it is called the "science" of hadith.
Those that reject the hadith will soon reject the Qur'an and then existance of God, this is the inevitable end of such people.
The saying of Medina was “that no one gives fatwa while Malik is in Medina” ...Imam Malik, the master muhadith of his time rejected “sahih hadith”..did he leave the Qur’an and God?
@@Lonzetta_3laama scholars have discussed at length over course of many generations how to grade the hadith. Those hadith that are agreed upon as being sahih cannot be rejected. Their rejection is not going to render a person nonMuslim but is certainly a serious issue. Many scholars have rejected sahih hadith due to them being a singular narration on a subject or perhaps they have been deemed to be in violation with other many hadith or Qur'an (possible in case of abrogation for example)
The point is that one of the things that have arisen in this age is hadith rejection where people even go as far as declaring the hadith to be a conspiracy against Islam.
When we cherry pick evidence, we can easily make such claims.
Lmao im 17 and i know more about this guy
Please educate us great child 😅😂
Mufti,
Just demolish Bukhari in a series of videos and leave it at that.
He done it in monday night with mufti episode 87 and 88 if I'm correct
Love how people just blind follow . Pick and chose flavour of the month and eventually come to think yeh if this guy says its all wrong it must be because he has a youtube channel. Absolute clowns and then they end up rejecting everything 🤣. Lets follow the Quran only. Instead of united the muslims lets just divide everyone.
@@Asif_Malik786
Instead of being dismissive, show what you know.
He has two Bukharigate videos.
He is also not against all hadith, just some.
@@Asif_Malik786 are you advocating against following the Qur'an?
ANYTHING tht goes against quran n sunnah is PATHETIC
Dimebag mufti, with that necklace you got on. You play guitar my friend? 😄 By the way punanny means something different in america.
Thank God ! The ummah was on a Dalala for 1400 years by using the Bukhari until you and the other dudes showed up !
Probably Bukhari became popular less than 500 years ago. When Muslims reached Andalusia, Imam Bukhari hasn't born yet.
@@taptronics 500 years ago... Bruh please stop exposing your ignorance.
The Bukhari book wasn't famous for 600 years ?!
And you're on the right path, because you believe the prophet married a six year old, and Moses chased a rock naked?
He isn't against EVERY hadith in Bukhari, he just assesses them critically, and finds many of them very suspect.
As do many other scholars.
@@taptronics 800 years ago ... and Bukhari was world famous in his own day, he debated with famous scholars from Medina and was regarded as the Master of hadith for is photographic memory. From when kids are born we learn of Bukhari , we ourself try to challenge him but more you read the higher Bukhari's respect elevates in our hearts. Read his life and his compilation of works before you listen to this goat
@@786qad Bukhari an exile from Bukhara isn't important
*ADNAN RASHID* is the only one that has the knowledge on this that could debate you. He knows that the Quran itself is technically a book of Hadith (most don't even know this). HE knows and how these collections 'crosses into' Al-Hadith. He also has specific knowledge that is *rarely discussed.* But for Bukhari specifically *I HEARD* there are language issues that suggest Urdu is *MORE ACCURATE* and preserved than the Arabic. Theres also large libraries *specifically in Urdu* regarding hadiths that are unique to Pakistan (I heard). Actually, think about it, one of the OLDEST masjids *VERIFIED* by GPS Qibla direction is in Pakistan.
*Farid Responds* might be willing, but I don't think he has the knowledge to do it.. and it would be opening a can of worms for him. Any ex-Quran-only person would be able to do it.
Actually, ANYONE who seriously digs into the Hadiths, you will eventually reach a point where it crosses into Quran etc. and it's like opening Pandora's Box - it could change your whole world around and *perspective on Islam itself.* Many its for the BETTER though and it will bring them closer to the Quran, Prophet and and Companions.
The truth sets you free. And that's the place where Abu Layth is. And thats why they are hostile towards him. Remember that Peacemaking gives a greater blessing than all charity, fasting etc... or something like that.. can't remember the hadith. ;)
Your sure about that? 👇czcams.com/video/dDKqqFDCzvI/video.html
I HEARD there are language issues that suggest Urdu is MORE ACCURATE and preserved than the Arabic. Theres also large libraries specifically in Urdu regarding hadiths that are unique to Pakistan (I heard). Actually, think about it, one of the OLDEST masjids VERIFIED
@@nehakulkarni5009
He didn’t say urdu was created by Islaam 🙄
@@lavish_1717 He didn’t say
@@nehakulkarni5009
Yes he should have said India. But what’s ishiliam? Do you mean ismailli Shia sect?
Whether some are sahih or not... Since majority of ahadhith in bukhari are sahih, traditionally call this as sahih bukhari... This kind of discussion is not need of the hour we live in.. better avoid this kind of discussions... There are many productive things we need to discuss on. May allah guide us
This guy isn’t a fukin mufti
Why are you obsessed
Bukhari will always be world famous till judgement day. Those who know and read his life have absolute respect and nothing less. You can enjoy your 200 comments and a few subscribers .... one video on you tube of Bukhari hits 20 million views .... who's status has Allah elevated? .... get well soon brv.
St. Paul of Christianity is even more famous, does that mean God elevated him? Paul abolished the Torah and said the devil is "the god of this world" in 2 Corinthians 4:4 and lies bluntly about Hebrew in Galatians 3:16, yet Christians still believe he's a great man!
Simply put, you're using a bandwagon fallacy to establish Bukhari, I mean Farabri👍
Abu layth and the caller I don't believe are Muslims.
To Allah we shall return for His Judgement and we won't be wronged !
Who are you to say?
And have you listened to his arguments? None of those wahhabis even dare debate him!
Do you not know the gravity of calling people disbelievers?
Talk to farid, don't run
Farid is the one running brotha
@@illuminatethepath404 go to a channel called sunni defense and go to playlists and click mufti abu layth. See the refutations and you tell me who's running.
@@usmanuddin1366 🤣 those ain’t no “refutations” there are merely shoving their one sided views and claiming they are *the* views and therefore mufti is “wrong” 🤣🤣. Go on Twitter and see Farid coward away from a MindTrap with mufti, he can’t stand the actual facts.
@@illuminatethepath404 what are the facts? Bukharis ahadith which can be found in different chains in different books are wrong? Even if bukhari is gone, the hadiths still exist. Why do you attack bukhari? What's the use in it?
@@usmanuddin1366 No one said Bukarhi has to be gone, and the facts are in muftis Bukarhi gate videos, something gangu teli (Farid) hasn’t responded to and is chickening out from coming to his MindTrap to have a discussion, go DM Farid if he’s got the answers as you claim to come destroy this mufti if it’s so easy on his MindTrap 😂😂🤣🤣🤣
Bukhari is the most authentic after the quran, period
Never
HAHAHA
Do you have any evidence .mad man
hadith are not Allah's words nor the messenger direct words either. Quran is the one and only truth.
@@__Amira__
Allsh said, whatever the prophet gives, take it and whatever he prohibits, refrain from it.
Hadith is what the prophet gave us so we need to accept it
Talk with @adnanrashid @mohammadhijab