Why NVidia is betting EVERYTHING on the METAVERSE
Vložit
- čas přidán 16. 08. 2022
- Use 25% code : C25
Win10 pro key（$15）：biitt.ly/pP7RN
Win10 home key（$14）：biitt.ly/nOmyP
Win11 pro key（$21）：biitt.ly/f3ojw
office2021 pro key（$60）：biitt.ly/DToFr
Bzfuture 2022 back to school 50% off : biitt.ly/EIe2z
Support me on Patreon: / coreteks
Buy a mug: teespring.com/stores/coreteks
Bookmark: coreteks.tech
My channel on Odysee: odysee.com/@coreteks
I now stream at:
/ coreteks_youtube
Follow me on Twitter: / coreteks
And Instagram: / hellocoreteks
Footage from various sources including official youtube channels from AMD, Intel, NVidia, Samsung, etc, as well as other creators are used for educational purposes, in a transformative manner. If you'd like to be credited please contact me
#nvidia #metaverse #ai - Věda a technologie
This just sounds like a commercial horror story! If Nvidia has anything to do with it, they'll pull support and force upgrades within years
If they are trying to build an ecosystem that would work against their interests. Look at how long Apple supports their devices for example. Also Nvidia is still releasing driver updates for 8 year old GPUs.
@@rayhaanomar1200 they withdrew support for my last Nvidia GPU less than 3 years after it was on retail.
8 year old design isn't the right point when they recycle chips and release them under new model numbers or in this case the same model as a GPU from a later generation.
The metaverse's description is so weak that makes chasing it from "pretty much impossible" to "we already have it" given interoperability between internet, games, webs, videos, social media and many more not only already exists, but is easily extensible by any developer.
Shut up hater the meta verse is the future dude!
One thing Coreteks is not good at is predictions, so who knows.
For my part, I look forward to corporatized, corrupt, centrally controlled projects like meta failing miserably. The internet was cool because it was decentralized, bottom up.
The Metaverse is a gimmick, we can't sustain that energy lost to dumb entertainment purposes for the rich.
Just take a look what is happening in the world in this summer heat, one of the core survival ingredient is drying up.
How can you build on top of that while the core structure is failing in multiple countries.
I agree with you. If someone creates a decentralized hosting service for instance based on what torrents do and we can host each others applications and get some crypto in return for providing the hosting that will be the nail in the coffin of big corporations. That's what someone has to do to get our decentralization back in my opinion.
@@desireisfundamental Need proper public owned Backbones for Digital Communications owned by the people and then peer to peer generation of communications technologies (VR / AR / Vid / Audio etc).
Big problem I see here is monopolisation by Corporations of 3D Internet and the milking of peoples lives and privacy as a result. Metaverse - Facebook - no thanks.
Open Systems and Peer to Peer hosting and generation - the same as we have to move forward with Energy Infrastructure and Agriculture.
As someone who grew up with PC's and had a thirst for technology - the recent few years has put a huge dampener on my enthusiasm for tech and where it is heading. Sort of like the Borg (Coirporations and WEF) vs The Federation of older ST.
Douglas Adams called it in the 90s. This is a bottom up world now. The sore losers at the top are doing everything they can to change the inevitable or to convince us otherwise. But it's true. Bottom up is cool and much better for most people. And bottom up scares the heck out of the few at the top.
@@desireisfundamental well it's always good to also get back into reality when you realize having something too decentralized like crypto can also bite you in the arse in the end. They are as bad and corrupt with all those scams, pump and dumps like the worse of a corporation, and at the end of the day it stops even functioning like a currency.
We'll go back in time to when electricity was scarce and then continue on. I dont think the metaverse will become the thing that corporations want it to become. And we will wave goodbye to corporations that presumably "can't fail to ruins" from what it seems today. Only time will tell.
The metaverse looks like a solution to a problem we don't have. Lots of brilliant marketing will be needed to manufacture a need for it.
Absolutely !
Too many people go with the hype of an absurd announcement made by Facebook (that was made in order to shift the attention they got after Frances Haugen revealed shady stuff they do with Instagram)...
It's so sad !
We need so many people working together to make humanity behave nicely towards nature and wildlife, and what we get is people marketing stuff noone *needs*...
BINGO! It's a marketing VP's wet dream!
Do we really need TikTok though?
Nah, as long as it uses 5G and nanotech it'll be fine...
Reminds me of so many Black Mirror episodes. Don't say we haven't been warned.
I also grew up reading and watching sci-fi, but I always viewed those worlds as either dystopian or utopian; I never imagined or craved them to be real.
Well said! Nice place to visit, but you wouldn't want to die there! :-D
Isn't one of the central aspects of the sci-fi Cyberpunk/Dystopian Utopian works human behavior? The alteration/manipulation of behavior with a ruling body that dictates what is life and what is human?
I concur. I don't want those worlds we saw in fiction to be non-fiction.
Bc we don't need meta, we already have the real world, and the real world offers much higher fidelity and connection speeds.
One thing that made HTML work is being an open language.
the metaverse will also only work when it is open. i think this omniverse file stuff is open source.
Apple literally made HTML5 viable.... they killed of Flash.
Ok, now I'm certainly building my next PC with AMD only :D
Nvidia wants an iPhone moment.
So making the industry absolute garbage with a product that's not really that groundbreaking? Fair enough.
The best case scenario for users is that the metaverse is a huge, stupid waste of money that investors eventually give up on.
Nvidia is really afraid of APUs and integrated graphics, that's why it needs to create some revolutionary crap ground up like RTX
RTX is nothing revolutionary, it's just raytracing, which was used for decade in the 3D movie industry and would inevitably hit videogames regardless of nvidia.
RTX=DXR you fell for the marketing.
@@astreakaito5625 not real Ray tracing dedicated hardware is needed without Nvidia pushing the grounds first I don’t see amd trying it out.
RT is not just a gimmick. I have been playing Horizon: Forbidden West. The graphics are great, but they breakdown miserably and often. The lighting looks good outside, but it constantly breaks down indoors, in caves, or in otherwise shaded areas.
Current RT is gimmicky improvements to traditional lighting. Lumen will be the first real taste of truly good RT lighting (with tricks to save resources). This current gimmick WILL pay off… at least until it is saturated. At some point a GPU can fully RT every seen at a good enough resolution with enough geometry.
@@rars0n Doesn't Lumen use Voxel Cone Tracing instead?
Do you play much VR yourself Coreteks? if so, what's your main headset?
Wow, this sounds exactly like the kind of sales pitch we heard in the infancy of NFT.
And not in a good way, though you'd have to be delusional to be able to see that statement in a good way in the first place.
Metaverse reminds me of Elon's vacuum tube train thing. Farts in the wind, just very expensive fats by very rich people.
hahah its to oposite.
the trains at theoretical potential are actually the ultimate solution to transportation. think 20 minutes from Paris to Shanghai - the speed limit is the human body's ability to handle acceleration. they can function like electric motors with high efficiency rates the entire distance. no friction.
the biggest problem is building them. and them figuring out that the levitation can be radial. increase the vacuum. etc
You forget something very important - a growing number of people that don't want to do anything with facebook, Zuck or any of the services they provide. I have been Facbook clean for over 5 years.
Nvidia controlling the metaverse is the worst thing to ever happen.
I think of all the companies involved in building the Metaverse and I shutter a little bit. Let's pick all of the companies with track records of having the least interest in protecting their customers interests or needs and put them together into a giant room to brainstorm for an afternoon and see what ideas they managed to poop out. Oh look, let's welcome to the world the Metaverse!
The thing about apple is branding, it was already a major brand with the ipod years before the iphone, and even in the 90s it still had many die hard fans. Meanwhile the only ones that care about nvidia as a brand are hardcore PC gamers, not even gamers in general
It anymore !
Video game developers have a vested interest in not making cross transferable vanity items. Then they can charge you in micro transactions to get similar items, if you could just bring it over they wouldn't get that money.
The first game to allow freely importing items at no cost (making money some other way) couldl be very successful, so other companies will have no choice but to follow suit.
I don't think so. Transferrability is a great value adder for an in-game asset. They might lose out on money from items brought in from other games, but they can make more money on selling transferrable items from their own game at higher prices.
Now imagine if these items were NFTs and the developers got a comission for every transaction.
Yeah it sorta faceplants as a concept when you put just a bit of thought into both the variety of games out there and how dragging items from one game to another can short circuit huge chunks of intended gameplay and difficulty and actually make the playing experience worse. I don't need my diamond minecraft sword in Hardspace: Shipbreaker and if I had my Marauder mech in Pillars of Eternity I'd immediately break the game. The metaverse presumes a sameness in scale and type of experience in games that just doesn't exist in the present and would be a horrific draining of the variety of games out there if they succeeded.
That some of the further responses here that are cheering it along are hoping that they'll get hooked up with NFTs is even more damning.
I think this also applies to a lot of the more productive uses of the metaverse as well, sure reorganizing your factory in VR is great as is training your robot in VR, excellent utilization of VR are a technology. What exactly does having it in the same shared universe as your couch visualization do for you? The answer is of course that it does little to nothing for you. To me at least it misses the fundamental benefit of connectivity on the internet, it's access, not interoperability. The fact that wikipedia and youtube are available on the same network is powerful because it provides access to huge quantities of information in both, how well or poorly wikipedia and youtube interact with one and other is pretty close to irrelevant as far as the user is concerned. Having some common base tools/renderers can be good and all that but Unreal and Unity have been playing that game for some time now, what does the metaverse add other then a larger more powerful set of companies trying to monopolize the space.
That's a limited POV imo, you would just need to find the right spin to make it attractive. Maybe they'd just charge you extra to have a version of the vanity that could be transferred to a suite of games. Imagine being able to transfer your preferred gun kit between all of the main shooter games for a unified cost, or getting specific perks/items/cosmetics in different games if you've hit certain milestones in others. Certain providers like Ubisoft already track your progress in their games and have stuff akin to this, and they're not alone. It's not that hard to imagine similar tactics being applied.
This isn't to say I endorse or want this to happen, I'm just pointing out that I respectfully disagree :)
Once upon a time we would have thought paid vanity items would never happen, or e-sports in themselves, and today both are raking in stupid amounts of money and business.
Times change.
The Ad is wrong. Window 10 Pro key with a free upgrade will get you Windows 11 home, with no remote desktop. If you want Windows 11 Pro, just buy the key for that directly. It’s usually the same price, $15. Some places are $11.
Dude, come on! You are old enough to remember the time when NOT EVERYONE could put content "on the internet". A time when NOT much was digital and people had to actually code their websites with text in a notepad... When we had to shoot video on magnetic tape and then digitize it if we wanted to share it, long before CZcams existed... ... So just like we went from that, to now where any child can swipe across a display, capture some "content" and then finger smudge edit it before posting it "on the internet" likewise, the crafting for that world may begin with a niche group of individuals who have the skills to create content, [if it's going to be mainstream] it will evolve to have tools that the masses can utilize to more easily create.
I don't know, the Metaverse to me is the equivalent to NFT's. It's an interesting concept but it's not something I "need" or asked for. Even the compelling reasons why I might want it or need are all weak reasons bordering novelty. I just don't see it. Am I the only one? :/
Also the “meta verse” has already existed for like 20 years all it is is just a new buzz word to sell you on a idea thats already ben a thing for awhile now
I just don't think you've really grasped the sheer importance of digital "ownership" if you believe NFTs and web3 tech to be something you don't need. This tech allows for more capabilities on the web WITHOUT having to trust a centralized entiy like a company or corp and instead trust an open-source protocol, why are people so scared of its use!? Sure distributed systems may cost more money initially, but you have immutable mechanisms to secure digital data whether that's some digital content, crypto, IP etc, there's no better system that truly can't be manipulated. Most people don't understand what Double Spending is in the first place and why it's so problematic which is the entire reason for all of this derivative blockchain tech to begin with. Do you not like censorship resistance and individual auditability?
@@FallsFait Blockchain is a legit concept. Pity scammers give it a bad reputation with their NFTs and scamcoins.
@@thesenamesaretaken True. NFTs are also a legit concept, they’re backed by blockchain and DLT, it’s a shame many people only choose to view the entire space from the lenses of scrutiny thanks to the news’ specific coverage of the actions of some bad actors. NFTs will eat all of securities one day, wallstreet is nearing its end of global power
I really hope this isn't true as the metaverse is not even close to being approachable for the average person. It's going to be 10-20 years before it'll have mainstream appeal. This is like seeing Arpanet in 1968 and going all-in into internet immediately instead of waiting for it to mature. The tech just isn't ready yet.
They know this, too. And that's why they're doing their best to make the stuff cost about the same as a mobile phone. And, the obvious aim is to 𝙧𝙚𝙥𝙡𝙖𝙘𝙚 the phone, so people can afford to keep buying products and services.
We we will get nuclear fusion power before the metaverse becomes relevant.
Check out tilt 5, best AR on the market. On a more serious note, we need to not rely on the corporate giants for the "metaverse" The means to create the AR/VR world is already here and should be decentralised, the idea of a meta/facebook/cia/nsa with direct camera, microphone and 3d representations to our homes should be rejected along with mental manipulation that modern psychology and technology combined can produce.
People will be willing to subject themselves to what you've listed for the sake of the " E X P E R I E N C E." ☹️
@@methodedge2484 yourself included... the metaverse is here and trust me that gov doens't really need more tech to know more about you, they have all the data in the world as we are now to figure out everything they'd ever need
If the state of current year technology, from internet to smartphones, is anything to go by then decentralised projects will be niche at best.
@@thesenamesaretaken it's going to the linux of vr
@@thesenamesaretaken where is the logic in this? We're at the beginning of defi, if the trend continues we'll see defi project on every single device around... You pretend blockchain isn't immutable or something
Question: How do you guys feel about the stock price?
Hi Coreteks
How ironic that USD is mainly supported for Linux and meanwhile Nvidia treats desktop Linux like a second class platform compared to Windows.
Given the direction on different topics regarding gaming, graphics and general computing I guess we're on a major crossroad soon. Time will tell.
10:50 I think you mean: "Simple glasses that everyone without glasses can wear".
I have a contradictory relationship to Facebook/Meta: On one hand I couldn't care less about their plans for a dystopian, centralized and over commercialized VR internet called "metaverse". Where everything you say, think or do is digital and converted into profit.
On the other hand I love their heavily subsidized standalone VR headsets for playing Beat Saber.
Why the heck is "creating scarcity" seen as a GOOD THING?
they need virtual landfill and virtual cubicle to fill. Imagine creating a virtual world where everything is possible and making it scarce like the real world so you can keep doing maximum profit extraction.
Only soulless corporations could think that.
When you want to scam people by selling crap that costs you nothing to create.
Because why would profiteers bother adapting to the new possibilities the digital revolution makes possible when they can just import old restrictions from the physical world?
Metaverse = cyberpunk dystopia
The one thing I have to push back against as a constant is digital scarcity. That is a hard limit of a system that is holding back progress as it does not benefit from the idea of a duplicator.
Why buy the next best ai assistant if you can duplicate it for next to nothing? This holds back productivity in favor of slowed favorism.
"Metaverse" is just Habbo hotel for corporations
Coreteks - the good channel that makes you think "Why did I put 1.5 speed on".
One thing many need to understand is that, if it's dystopian or not, it doesn't matter. Technological evolution can be unforgiving and the corporations developing said technology are driven by profits. XR/AR/VR can and WILL allow them to extend their businesses to earn more marketshare.
The Metaverse is going to be as successful as 3D glasses have been for film and TV. The Meta verse has been around since the earliest MMO's. Its a stupid label for an internet connected virtual spaces that can never compete with the real world. what world do you want to live The Matrix or the Real Physical world ? I know which I prefer and that one is free.
is like going for Virtual Reality in the 90s... not today
You know Linden Labs tried this too, and failed.
Did you by any chance discuss this 2 years ago? I know this is a long shot but did you discuss it 2 years ago AND Before other people did? Could you tell us more about that more often in each video please? Thank you.
@@tstager1978 I understand why you want to hear of his exclusives exclusively…I just got a very strange sensation that maybe he had discussed this 2 years ago…exclusively. Glad I’m not alone.
nReal light is already there for AR and is much simpler technology.
Look at Carmacks talk with Friedman: I agree with him saying the key is cheap accessibility and a good choice of functions to focus on. nReal do both of those right, but have no software enough - I think that is the third point to make things sell.
I will never join the metaverse and i think a lot people won't either so that would be a problem
That's like saying you'd never join web 2.0 when the internet started adding interactability. The metaverse will just be web 3.0, it will add spatial computing and wider interactability. even if you never get a headset, you'll still find yourself using it.
i mean,never say never, maybe sometimes in the distant future something cool can come out of it. Remember Hitler was nominated for the Nobel Peace prize in 1939 lmao
@@Mechenzo440 The Dystopian future that awaits us will make 1939 look like a walk in the park.
I will never play video game and I think a lot of people won’t either so that’s the problem
hahah boober 2.0
holographic glasses sounds like google cardboard but worse in almost every way
why does this give me NFT Crypto bros vibe ???
crypto or nft or web free are all good technologys. the problem is the reputation got destroyed because of people whoe used it in a bad way.
I'm surprised there's not more Ready Player One references and about how this version of the Metaverse is exactly what the corps want to build in the book :p
If they are learning from apple, they should make the glasses stylish.
The last thing we need right now is the Metaverse.
If Jensen is buying into it, it must have some real potential, the dude's razor sharp.
So my hunch is that while they are showing us the dorky heavy goggles... they've got something way better being cooked up in secret.
Cause after the first mind-blowing experience... I can only take wearing those goggles for short periods of time.... they are the Achilles heel.
Those lenses are cool and all, but that’s only ONE PART of an HMD. You still need the array of sensors or cameras and accelerometers…. Plus additional hardware to drive those displays. Then if it’s wireless, then you need an SoC, battery, and cooling…
exactly ... if it's so easy eeryone would do it ... this is why performance per watt is so important and why Apple is killing it. NVidia/Intel/AMD is far ... far behind.
My Inner-Boomer dont buy this "Omniverse" BS.
Looks the entire Meta thing sure went really well.
I love my PSVR, I know it's not the better system, but it's about the only one that works for people with glasses.
That said, there's almost no way I'd want to use it for browsing the internet, watching youtube and looking at photo's. And definitely not for using social media.
Plus I know others who aren't interested in VR as it makes them sick, and others who refuse to wear such a big headset, and some who even wont wear glasses to watch 3D movies.
Good luck getting it to catch on.
thats because the psvr heatset is big and bulcky and has bad resolution and bat tracking and bad contollers. and other bad stuff. also u are wrong about the glasses stuff.
I am not a fan of walled gardens. Open source is the way!
In my language meta means shithole where you go to buy cheap moonshine, frequented by winos etc.
I think FB/Meta is heavily dependent on nVidia to create hardware and rendering software for metaverse, FB/Meta itself probably has very little experience in advanced graphical tech needed for advanced efficient large scale 3D rendering "engine" or better combo of underlying tecnologies for graphic acceleration not just of the interface but the whole AR, needed for running the whole "verse", they can't just offload to your PC, especially highly dynamic "space/verse" around the avatar representing you
I think Meta's role will be in tying things together on a platform. They will become the "Meta" of the metaverse. Nvidia will provide the tools and hardware, Microsoft the hosting and business applications, Meta the social networking of content, Apple the physical glasses, and a wide range of developers producing content.
there xiaomi glasses also. but it just glasses with screen tho
I am quite happy with the size of my head. I don't want a bigger one, thanks.
nice,just now i need the key😍
They’re desperate to keep their share price up.
The metaverse is a newer term working its way into the mainstream. There's a good chance you've heard of it, but you might not necessarily know what it is or what it means for you.
I knew it we are in a ancestor simulation
no one wanna play vr more than 1 hour maybe daily 3 hours.
I like the idea of training AI/Neural Networks in a virtual world.
I wonder if this one of those slow incremental development
No, this is one of the scary exponential ones
I liked the book Snow Crash by Neal Stephenson. Read it sometimes in the 1990s.
That's when I first heard the term Metawerse.
I dont see the point of a "metaverse".
We need to ask us a question.. we really have time for this?
We are flood with information, we jump between content from minute to minute.
This mean we dont have time to get our glasses and isolate our self from the world, we do not care much about the format anymore, just content who does not require our full focus to allow us to do our job or daily activities at the same time.
Besides.. with companies like "facebook" behind this.. I dont want to have nothing to do with it.
The Metaverse is not a tool to advanced the civilization fast.
It eats so much energy and is catered towards dumb waste less entertainment.
We need that huge energy budget to solve other problems first, before we can waste it on dumb entertainment stuff for the rich.
Advancing AI and putting that knowledge into robots is a way better path to solve underlying core issues in the civilization.
The metaverse sounds like that 3d world that was popular some time ago, companies bought property in that world etc. The popularity declined over time and like a lot of things after a while it was only used for sexual purposes. Can't even be sure of the name second live or something like that? Meta will go the same way and Nvidia is desperate for sales
Secondlife.
I know it as a place where furries hang out, and for Japanese lawsuits about destruction of in-game property.
@@nathangamble125 but doesn't this whole meta thing remind you of second life? The graphics might be better but the concept is the same
SL is indeed extremely popular among furries and people with (often very) questionable sexual interests. So is VRChat.
Anyone remember VRML?
what if you have gozzy eyes?
Oh hell no
Not sure I want to live in a world ruled by Nvidia greed, or FB's Meta lack of privacy
Metaverse: because we have now CLEARLY isn't bloated enough. /s
I'd just like to point out that all of the sci-fi stories you referenced as inspiration are explicitly dystopian. 🙂
Ppl don't want to wear glasses either.
Nvidia doesn't really have a choice. The problem is that they might not be the one who creates the 3D realm. Facebook is being big on this and even changed their name to Meta.
The medical issues, caused by a regular focusing-defocusing on a so close surface like VR-glasses or VR-headsets during eye accommodation, (like for example the ciliary muscles spasms etc.) should be taken in consideration here, especially in a long-term use case scenario. Of course a smartphone overuse comes with its own ergonomic or psychological problems too, but it's nothing close to a gradual eyesight deterioration.
On the other hand, even if the simulation of digital worlds for the sake of a social media or entertainment succeeds somehow in the near or far future, based on the Principle of Computational Irreducibility, introduced by Stephen Wolfram not so long ago, any such kind of digital reproduction of a real (or even imaginary) world will shortly turn into a boring repeatable experience, not even close enough entertaining, descriptive or helpful as the real environment around, which performs constant real time LIVE "irreducible computations".
The best use cases for the technology I imagine would be an AR-assistance for human workforce in a way which increases reasonably the speed and the precision for a given task. But even in that case, mechanical electronic devices with some robust software tools outperform us substantially in more and more work areas e.g. the swiftness of Discord's "Midjourney" A.I. Bot in the Artistic area.
Sadly most business won't care about health issues that stem from forcing it workers to be using AR/VR all day at work.
VR headsets currently focus on a visual plane that's about 2m away. It's far better than phones or monitors in that regard
@@zamundaaa776 That's true of course, but a constant fixed focus distance in Headsets without the immediate ability to freely change focus distance by looking at different places around is not a healthy solution at all, for other reasons. In the case of AR glasses - If there is an Reflective/Refractive object close to the eyes, one that emits or transmits light as additional information (such as the AR glasses), sight needs to jump from real objects to a fixed augmented projection, and often loosing focus due to light noise (highlights in the reflective surface caused by glossy reflection/refraction) in an artificial or daylight environment. On top of that - light sources with different refresh rate frequency and color temperature in a such extreme focus range (3-4 cm to 20 meters and more, if you are outside or with openings present) can introduce you to some wild headaches and dizziness.
We can't even play the same game with our friends on different platforms due to vendor lock-in (playstation vs xbox) and now we're supposed to have EVERYTHING work seamlessly with EVERYTHING else?
Give it time, also it's not so much about those games as you think, it's more like the internet and facebook integrated with everything in the real world.
@@GeneralBlackNorway I know it's not about games. My point was every vendor wants lock-in, interoperability is a huge issue. I just can't see a unified metaverse ever happening. To have an actual singular metaverse you'd need major cooperation across every single vendor, facebook, google, apple, microsoft, etc. Open APIs to run everything on, so cooperation between intel, amd, nvidia, arm, etc. I think we might see more internet and VR integration into real-world stuff but it's going to be fragmented IMO.
@@xtremereactionsllcincorpor2583 I agree, it will see a fragmented beginning, but over time pressure will mount for integration.
If VRChat is anything like the Metaverse I wish it would crash and burn instantly.
The metaverse is like interconnected VR. And VR is now, and probably forever will be, a niche pastime. Most people won't strap on a headset out of a bad Flash Gordon movie more than a few times, as a curiosity. VR sunshades-looking glasses with discreet earbuds would need to make the scene. I suppose a phone- or tablet-based window into virtual worlds might work well enough, but what would be the draw for the masses? So far, there isn't much, and nothing that can't be accomplished with more established internet tools. Is there a real need to interconnect 3D worlds into one metaworld (or verse)? I don't know, and nothing I've read or watched so far has changed that very much.
In short, I remain very skeptical the metaverse will ever achieve critical mass, and won't become yet another monetization paradise for corporations through NFTs or whatever fad emerges next. I never had such misgivings about the internet itself, because it was something genuinely new and exciting, which brought incalculable new utility to humanity. I just don't see that kind of potential in the metaverse, although I'm sure it will have its uses (like VR and AR do).
VR Porn is probably the most compelling current use case. Usage every night.
@@brainletmong6302 Porn did wonders for VHS and streaming adoption, just saying.
Please make more videos Virtual reality Coreteks
zzz.... Second Life again. If NVidia is betting everything on the metaverse (which I doubt), and if Facebook is scaling back R&D on the metaverse, what does that mean for NVidia stock?
But we already COULD have one sword in every universe. It's not in universe creators' financial interest, though. For all that ethereum does, this is Vitalik's/Ethereum's stupidest application.
Exactly, we can't even play the same game with our friends on different platforms due to vendor lock-in (playstation vs xbox) and now we're supposed to have EVERYTHING work seamlessly with EVERYTHING else?
My brother is a VR developer. He has an office with headsets hanging all over the place, and in the last two years or so I've only put one on for a few minutes when I stop by and he wants to show me something he's working on. I find VR to be a very cool technology, but It'll never be as amazing as the real world. I think that the closer we get to making the metaverse a real thing the more resistance to living in a digital fabrication will come up for the collective.
Corteks is always great for getting so close to the edge he falls right off, but I've found that seeing it as a bit of entertaining thought experiments is better than seeing it as actual predictions.
p.s. Corteks must die inside every time he reads the comment section where everyone instantly knows better than the highly researched video he just presented.
Cheers
I agree, nothing will be as amassing as the real world, yet here we are spending endless hours in front of screens on the flat internet that replaced pen and paper.
”Hatset”…
honestly I think they're making a huge mistake, but I was wrong about facebook
Even as someone that tries to in the know about upcoming trends and technology. Metaverse is a meme. There is a huge difference between sitting at a desk and staring at a screen vs something strapped to your face that ruins your perception of your physical space. Even if VR headsets get smaller and lighter wearing it will still be a burden. It won't replace social media, we already have instant communication in our pockets. Some white collar jobs might try to replace their office with it to only find out it will always be more efficient to have workers physically there. This will go the way of PShome a small dedicated userbase but not enough to achieve mass adoption. The metaverse bubble will pop and hard.
Imagine a phone that is weightless and effortless to move around. Now imagine this phone can transform and change it's screen size to what ever suits you in that moment, for example a TV on a wall or tablet at your desk. Now imagine that the screen is not just a single screen, but can integrate is self seamlessly with your physical environment as holographic additions. This is the future of Augmented Reality (AR), where all you need to do is put on a pair of glasses. In the far future it wont even be glasses, it will be straight to your brain.
For now all it looks like is gimmicks, but just like we use our phones for so much stuff today, we will use AR for just as much and more in the furutre.
@@GeneralBlackNorway But AR is not separate digital space like the metaverse. I can imagine a space where AR does take off. Early adopters will fitness applications where your hands aren't so freely available. Bikers using GPS. Someone will do a theater experience and the glasses apply digital effects to the stage actors. You can sell AR as a functional device, Metaverse will always be consider a video game. For example getting my elderly parents to try walking around a digital museum for 15 minutes is one thing but tell them they have to do their Church meetings in a metaverse chatroom they would riot.
Also I question how many people would being willing to undergo invasive brain surgery for the AR experience without glasses.
There is obviously going to be demand for a leightweight, wireless headset. But the metaverse itself is nothing but marketing babble. No substance whatsoever.
MetaShit.
For those confused, remember, YOU aren’t the market. What sells does not need to make sense to you.
We aren’t even close enough to a Metaverse alpha to judge it.
I'm a PCVR gamer and love VR, but I will have nothing to do with Facebook and Meta. Valve Index still king.
Yes, yes, aaaaand YES!
All of the Metaverse sounds like pipe dreams from some rich old person who says "cyber" a lot. Persistent, connected worlds? Stored where? Who connects them? Why? Digital twin factories, sure, imagine the cost of keeping the twin updated every single time someone changes something. Why would one game company cooperate with another on an item, let alone an entire industry? Who codes all that? When do they see ROI? Who will manufacture custom furniture? At what price? The list goes on...
It's all about teaching robots to everything, reducing cost and real world automations. In terms of using Metaverse just a sauce like Fortnite 2.0
Electricity cost 1MWh 4000 euro
Coreteks is the Matrix.
VR chat
hmm
Meta verse is the future bro
Me as a MMO player: *Pathetic*
As much as a computer nerd,geek,gamer,tech enthusiast that I am, I'm not spending a cent in the metaverse, Worthless rubbish.
Better off buying 10kg bags of rice the way the world is going, You can all buy your fake 10kg digital bags of rice and try and eat it, I'll stick to the real thing!
It's the same as NFT's, Digital rubbish that anyone else can just get a copy of, Give me a real Picasso painting to hang on the wall.
NFT's are much further, they are selling land as NFT now.
It is all constructed to go around the evil banking empire!
I'm with you on that!
On shane we'll see about that in a few years
Impressive video as always
Thanks for sharing :-)
they should have started doing this since 2014 instead they went after AI