Near Space Weather Balloon Shows Earth Curve
Vložit
- čas přidán 6. 02. 2022
- Screenshots from the following video have been used dishonestly by Flat Earthers to claim that it proves the horizon is Flat when seen from high altitude.
Original video:
"Near Space Weather Balloon Launch With Gopro to 109 000 Feet!" by Rotaflight
Short clip: • Near Space Weather Bal...
Full video (4 hours): • Near Space Weather Bal...
As we will see, the horizon is curved when the horizon is in the center of the frame. At all other times, the horizon is distorted by the Fish-Eye lens
FAIR USE STATEMENT
This video may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This material is being made available within this transformative or derivative work for the purpose of education, commentary and criticism and is believed to be "fair use" in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107.
For more information go to: www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/...
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this video for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Any attempt to misuse copyright to intimidate, harass or censor this video or its author will be vigorously defended.
NOTE: The author of this video uses www.counterdmca.com/ as an 'Agent of Service' to respond to DMCA takedown notices, and his personal information will not be divulged in the counter-notice.
Screenshots from the following video have been used dishonestly by Flat Earthers to claim that it proves the horizon is Flat when seen from high altitude.
Original video:
"Near Space Weather Balloon Launch With Gopro to 109 000 Feet!" by Rotaflight
Short clip: czcams.com/video/95NDkABAsSk/video.html
Full video (4 hours): czcams.com/video/9dfVtaZbuIQ/video.html
As we will see, the horizon is curved when the horizon is in the center of the frame. At all other times, the horizon is distorted by the Fish-Eye lens
FAIR USE STATEMENT
This video may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This material is being made available within this transformative or derivative work for the purpose of education, commentary and criticism and is believed to be "fair use" in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107.
For more information go to: www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this video for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Any attempt to misuse copyright to intimidate, harass or censor this video or its author will be vigorously defended.
NOTE: The author of this video uses www.counterdmca.com/ as an 'Agent of Service' to respond to DMCA takedown notices, and his personal information will not be divulged in the counter-notice.
@DOOM GRIFTER why L:2? L2 is a long way away, 1.5 million km. Flerfers just say they are all fake anyway. Just like with all the other images of Earth from space, including the Himawari satellite images. When they finally set up webcams on the Moon, Flerfers will say they are fake too. They have to.
They're going to claim they're using a fish eye camera or this is CGI or some kind of made-up complex optical illusion, there's no point arguing with these people.
Yup, there's always an excuse.
GoPros are fish eye. Go watch the full video. The earth starts curving this much at 500ft. Dazza, like all his videos, is intentionally being dishonest.
@@agaetis9472 what part of (quote) "As we will see, the horizon is curved when the horizon is in the center of the frame. At all other times, the horizon is distorted by the Fish-Eye lens" do you not understand?
Apparently it is acceptable for Flat Earthers to use fish-eye GoPro videos to "prove" the Earth is flat using cherry-picked frames but it is not ok for Globe Earthers to use frames where the horizon is right on the centre of the frame where there is zero distortion?
"Dazza, like all his videos, is intentionally being dishonest". Can you provide specific examples of where I have been intentionally dishonest in any of my other videos? Or are you just trolling?
@@dazzathecameraman oh i understand, it just doesn't matter, you're intentionally using the curved lens footage and disregarding the (tens of) other footage that don't use fish eye. This is how you're being dishonest.
"apparently it is acceptable-" no, it has *never* been acceptable to use fish eye. this is the basis on how we judge how flat the horizon is, why would we accept curved lens, again you're making no sense or you're obfuscating the truth to gatekeep.
@@agaetis9472 Why do you find it so difficult to comprehend how fisheye distortion works? Any straight line at the center of the picture will remain straight. This one doesn't.
In before people say, "But all lenses are curved".
Y.I.H.F.F.
as are eyeballs! ;)
0:20 and 0:38 vs 0:22 and 1:00
In the first time stamps camera is pointing downward and the curve is very prominent, in the second set the camera points upward and the curve levels out and becomes nearly convex as it goes upward.
Disregard the camera lens argument, what’s the explanation of the different curve prominence within just a few seconds in between a shot?
In the opening screen caption and in the description under the video, I state "As we will see, the horizon is curved when the horizon is in the center of the frame. At all other times, the horizon is distorted by the Fish-Eye lens". The explanation is that "At all other times, the horizon is distorted by the Fish-Eye lens". The point of this video is that the shape of the horizon or curve prominence will only be shown correctly when it passes through the dead-center of the video frame. All other times, it will be distorted, either more convex or more concave.
@@dazzathecameraman Well said.
Yep,Earth Is a huge sphere compared to our perception of reality....flerfoholics thinks the ball Earth is small enough to detect curvature no matter where you look...lol
Can’t have it both ways guys. At that altitude the horizon should be a few degrees below eye level right? So catching it in the center of the frame means the camera is pointing down.... what happens when you point a fisheye lens down? How about this..... let’s try with no fisheye? Lol
All that matters is that the horizon is dead centre in the middle of the frame - and yes, this can be when the camera is pointing "down" - a camera doesn't "know" whether it is pointing up, down or otherwise. The distortion to the horizon is when the horizon is above or below the centre of frame.
@@dazzathecameraman ok good point 👍. Now how about just not using a fisheye lens at all? Personally I don’t think that’s too much to ask
@@personanongrata2045you've missed the actual point of this video. The damn thing distorts just as much in opposite direction when pointed up and the horizon is at the bottom of the screen. So obviously the image is perfect in the center of the frame. With that information you now have only one rational conclusion.
@@deanmlshredder you’re the one that missed the point. If you have to use a fisheye lens to show curve… well…. You sure as hell can’t use that as proof of anything. I don’t know if the earth is flat or round. And unless you’ve actually been to “ space “ then if you think you do you’re lying to yourself
@@personanongrata2045 you can. The lens won't work any differently up there than it will down here. In the center is the undistorted image and the damn thing is round. Not a hard concept
The description of this and the original video don't say anything about the location, but the annotations at 0:54 reveal that this is above Trøndelag in central Norway, and we are looking more or less to the west.
My best guess is that the balloon was launched from somewhere close to Stjørdal, about 25 km east of Trondheim.
Thanks. I just had a look through the links in the various videos. There is a flight map shown at 11:50 in this video:
czcams.com/video/95NDkABAsSk/video.html
@@dazzathecameraman
Thanks! 😀
I didn't consider how long the balloon would drift during the flight, but it obviously passed close to Stjørdal about halfway. The footage in your video seems to be from roughly that point.
@@fromnorway643 it is amazing that they were able to recover it
@@dazzathecameraman
Yes, with some bad luck, it might have ended up in the Trondheimsfjord!
Funny is that an hypothetical "pizza Earth" if see from the height will show curved borders - after all a disk has curved borders.
So how "flath'ards" expect seem a straight horizon in this kind of video?
They'll just say your line was bent!!
Anyone one who says flat instead of curved cannot possibly oversee the implications that their statement has on industries, science, and all other aspects that work perfectly with the globe model!
FYI NASA as well as several missile manufacturers release schematics for their vehicles/weapons guidance systems very often. You will find many man many of them request systems that are meant to operate on a "stationary non rotating earth" lol.
Not to mention Einstein nor Stephen Hawking (who apprently doesnt understand science according to you) mentioned he could not disprove geocentric model, so he chose the heliocentric for philosophical reasons. Look it up meng.
Those aren't "schematics," those are mathematical models, and they routinely avoid computing things that don't matter *by "assuming" they don't exist in the mathematical model*.
So one common model making the rounds assumes a "rigid-body, unchanging-mass airplane in a stationary-air, flat, non-rotating world" - NONE OF WHICH ARE TRUE IN REAL LIFE. Just pretended to be true (because they can safely be ignored) to simplify the computation.
You're also misinterpreting Einstein, who found there is *no* absolute reference system - all are valid. Yes, that means you can use a system where the Sun and all the planets move relative to the Earth - but it doesn't work very well (look up epicycles).
If the footage is from near the top of that flight (109,000 ft = 33.2 km), the curvature will be the same as when looking towards the edge of a 2-metre-wide circle from 10 cm above its centre.
Oh, wow. 🍿
Why there are never records or pictures of the moon, when there send weather baloons in the Atmosphäre? Always we se only the sun. Why?
How large is your ball? 🤔
Very nicely and accurately earth curve proven ,,, again. It'll never sink in with these creatures, sad for them but hilarious for us.
🌎 globers 🌍 lol 😂
@@sunsetlights100 Glad you agree. Thanks for even adding a couple of examples.
@@sunsetlights100 globers know how to measure the real curvature even from distorted images. Flat earthers like you don’t even understand how this can be done, not even if it is explained to you. That’s why you believe the earth is flat while every single geometric measurement tells its curved with a radius of about 6,370 km.
How many geometric measurements of R and curvature drop do you need to be convinced that the earth is a globe? 10, 50, 100, 1000? I can give you hundreds of thousands such measurements right now, many to cm accuracy.
@@sunsetlights100 "Nuh-uh."
X🌍x globalists theory's in decline .....
Gotta lie to flerth.
But GoPro's famously have fish eye lenses, and our eyeballs are round, so somehow magically that makes everything we look at round too! To really see the flat earth you must pluck your eyes out and have someone stand on them. THEN you will see the curvature just fades away!
Bhahahaha! I laughed out loud! ;)
But, can't we just leave the eyeballs in their head but crush the head with something like about a 20 ton block of concrete, steel or whatever instead? Taking the eyeballs out and destroying them would give us a flatard who can genuinely even go to space and say " ah don see nah cureve".
@@dazzathecameraman High altitude balloon videos are interesting and entertaining enough to upload, but flat Earthers wouldn't be convinced of Earth's sphericity even if they went up in a billionaire's rocket. You just can't cure oddballs of their oddness.
@@mosquitobight indeed! If a Flerfer was taken up in a rocket and did a few orbits of the Earth, they would say it was all faked.
ewe think eyeballs are round?
Nice work, Dazza, Goodonyamate!
I'm going to go out on a limb here, and hazard a guess that we've just observed what some would call a curved horizon.
What do you think, flerfs?
Could it be that far edge of the flat frittata world you imagine, but have never, in the history of photography, ever documented?
Could it be atmospheric gases interacting with the aetherband?
Could it be atmospheric lensing, even though there is no such thing as it's a wives tale?
Could it be foreshortening of the distal aspects of the periferalary extents?
Could NASA have infiltrated the Go-Pro company and preprogrammed all their cameras to depict any pictures of horizons as curved?
Could it be high ride?
Hmmm...🤔
Arflat ran an specific experiment and had to resort to saying that the curve was the end of the disc. Oh well.
It's literally a gopro fisheye lens LOL even your dad NDT says you can't see earth curve at this height. Not only that but there's multiple videos without the fisheye lens that are even higher and the horizon is completely flat.
@@agaetis9472 He found the part in which the horizon meets the center, so all distortion of a straight line will be removed. Still curved.
@@agaetis9472 Neil was just wrong, he doesn't study the curvature of the Earth, he studies things off the planet. And why do you think we all worship Tyson? Psychological projection mabye?
@@agaetis9472 Last reply... Could you link some of these "higher footage with no fisheye lens no curvachuh" videos?
It would always be curved on a ball or on a flat plane. Thats how cameras work idk how people on both sides are too stupid to understand this
Did you even watch my video? It would appear that you didn't. If you did, then it would appear that you missed the point.
Dazza's point is based on this:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fisheye_lens#/media/File:Vlg_shop.jpg
Any SpaceX video should be enough proof, or so I thought..
Funny you should mention that
m.czcams.com/video/qpdTm45xZ1Q/video.html
For the brainwashed, it is enough...
@@rap1df1r3 lol... deniers like you only have denial; & I find it sad that a human mind can become so entrenched in a false notion (such as the FE), that you miss out on all the true wonders surrounding you.
How can any of you watch this and not see the the curve bending around as the camera raises and lowers? What's wrong with you?
We do see it. The poster of this video clearly explains the science behind it. We also see that when the horizon is centered there is a also a curve to the horizon, not very visible to the naked eye, yet evident when a straight line is used through the center - ie the curving of the round earth.
@@JustStaringOutWindow "the science!" 😂
Look at this fisheye lens photo:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fisheye_lens#/media/File:Vlg_shop.jpg
Do you see how the shelf closest to - but slightly below - the centre is _almost_ straight? It would be completely straight if passing through the exact centre of the frame.
Dazza's point was that since there's still a visible curvature when the horizon passes through the centre of the frame, that curvature has to be _real._
They will tell you it’s a fisheye lens.
It dies look like it. When the camera moves so does the curve.
That's not up for debate, it admittedly is a fish-eye lens. The only question is whether the claimed "center" of the lens was indeed that...
Neil Degras Tyson says not even the ISS is high enough to see the curve, but I am supposed to believe this random balloon can?
@@BaronUnderbite No he doesn’t say that at all. Stop spreading BS.
@@ironmaiden5658 there is literal video footage of him saying it. CZcams it you dumby. Stop having everything spoon fed to you.
Dazza, I'm sure if you gave the measure of the frame from side to side in miles and then the degree of the curve that you show in each frame and then run the numbers, it will come out to a perfect 360* - but even that won't make a flat head round 😁
Ok...ok. I get it. The earth IS flat. LOL!
Just kidding.
0:28 : flat
of course the fish eyes camera on the ballon is pointed down ... not straight
how it could pass to round to flat and flat to round ?
only a fish eye can do that :)
have a good day
Wriggle.
He found the centerpoint of the footage where any straight line with a fisheye view will remain straight. It doesn't.
@@doddermodd I guess we'll just have to take his word for it being the center point, then. Even though we've seen footage from much higher up that still doesn't show this much "curve"...
@@rap1df1r3 Watch the video yourself, take a screenshot, find the centerpoint, and horizontally compress it to see the curve easier. You don't need to take his word.
Could you link these videos that supposedly show no curvature? Every video I've seen so far appears curved at the centerpoint. And I've seen hundreds of these.
Fisheye distortion, assuming you are filming a straight line, will make it appear convex above the centerpoint and concave below the center. At the centerpoint, it will remain flat. The horizon doesn't.
No curve لا انحناء لايوجد انحناء
Wriggle & squirm incoming. :)
You have a beautiful drawing as an avatar, I'll give you that...
@@rap1df1r3 Yeah, except that it's a photo; we also have a beautiful planet to live on too.
@@jamescollins8397Nope, a NASA employee already admitted they're all fake, look it up.
Completely off mark dude.. You conveniently stop the video when the go pro camera show a slight curve but not the other way.. How can you justify a curve with a go pro lense.. You are waisting my time..
It appears that you have completely missed the point. Did you bother to read the caption right at the start? It is also in the description under the video and in the pinned comment...
"As we will see, the horizon is curved when the horizon is in the center of the frame. At all other times, the horizon is distorted by the Fish-Eye lens"
Due to the fish-eye distortion, the true shape of the horizon can only be seen when the horizon is right in the centre of frame.
Dazza's point is based on this:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fisheye_lens#/media/File:Vlg_shop.jpg