I'm from Japan 🇯🇵 I became Muslim 6 years ago I had used to read philosophy books (Descartes, Kant, Platon)before being Muslim Ilmu Karam ...we don't need to know and learn as Muslim If we apply philosophy thinking , Japanese will not enter to Islam Japanese will reply and against to Islam by philosophy Da'wah by Quran and Sunnah and Akhraaq and Good Adab... it's enough Islam is composed by Quran and Sunnah , just 2. Not + Ilmu Karam
I think ive never heard a Japanese being a muslim (with all due respect) May Allah guide you to success in this life and in the next arigato akhi jazakallah khair
Jazzakallah khair for sharing and may Allah bless you and bring your family and people to Islam. The imam at my masjid done taraweeh in Tokyo during Ramadan 2019 and was very impressed with Japanese people and their values as they are very similar to Islam in many ways
Watching this video on the day Br. Mohammad Hijab Challenged Br. Abdur Rahman Hassan on a debate on 'Ilm ul Kalam. Also it's almost Ramadan 1442. Taqabal Allahu mina wa minkum. This was a much needed refresher for me. Thank you Ustadh! May Allah aza wajjal guide us all to the Correct Aqeeda. Ameen.
JazakAllah khairan ya Sheikh I love your aqeeda series,very beneficial. I learned a lot! I have a question: why many great imams of Islam such as Nawawi took from Ash'ari aqeeda (considering that their knowledge was very big)?
I had the same questions and I think I found why so. First of all, Nawawi (and other muhaddiths like ibn Hajar al Athqalani) had some VIEWS of Ash'ari aqeeda. There's a difference between to be an Asha'riy and have some similar views with them. Secondly, ummah did not recognized them for their aqeeda, but rather for their huuuuge efforts in knowledge of hadeeth. For example, ibn Hajar is famous of giving the best commentary to imam Bukhari's Sahih. And Nawawi is famous of giving the best commentary to imam Muslim's Sahih.
I saw this video months ago and i read the title and had two thoughts. One was like "But i thought this was Ash'ari thing and haram". Then i thought to myself that maybe Uthman Ibn Farooq hafidhahullah is simply explaining why it is not what the Salaf as Salih used and why we should not use, study Kalam. The latter is clearly correct. I originally saw Ustadh Abdurrahman Hassan and Shahid from 'Al Madrasatu Al Umariyyah' channels Hot stet Podcast where they discussed Ash'arism and the statements of the great Ulama of the Salaf were mentioned like the statement of Imam shafi'i rahimahullah. Also the statements of Fakh Al Din Al Razi and Al Ghazali were mentioned and how Ilm ul Kalam has no use what so ever. Worse, it is confusing and philosophy IS confusing without any doubt. So *if these experts of Kalam at the end of their lives were regretful of them wasting with Kalam, we see that is is clearly not useful* . Now i know a bit more and this information is obviously very useful. The small amount i discussed with Wannabe philosophers, i saw how irrational they were even though they tried to act as if they were rational.
Of course you did not understand, he didnt even define it really...listen to what he says from 7:26 and onwards, it does not make any sense, he is unclear and jumps. Mantiq is door to kalam or it is sitting down and speculating and talking about things...this is what i got from this video.
@@AbbasAli-ov4gj Asalām-Alaykum dear brother. No offense to you my brother, it is best to be respectful to the Sheikh. I understood what Mantiq is afterwards, this was an old comment. He does explains it, it is explained I would say, in a small amount. The Sheikh has said that in other to debate with each other, they would lay down some common terms, grounds or rules. So, in brief; philosophy has Logic, perhaps if one would say as a branch. It has a set of rules applied in an argument or in a debate that one has to abide by, in order to come to a better state of reasoning or a conclusion. All of this is based upon the limited understanding of men, all of this is rejected and has no place in the religion of Allāh.
Mantiq is just the Arabic word for Logic. Logic is the gateway to Kalaam, which is a logical look at Islamic theology. There were two main and one minor school of theology during that early period of Islam: (1) Asharai (2) Maturidi and (3) Athari. Ahmed ibn Humbel (as noted in ibn rajab) said that Allah has "yad" but that isn't a body part. A word can have a literal meaning, a metaphorical meaning, or a technical meaning in the sharia. He said the word had a technical meaning in the sharia, and we don't know what that is. He affirms the word as an attribute of Allah, but rejects it as a body part. The hambalis had Asharis in them and Al-lal Athar. Some of the later groups were anthropomorphism. There are clear books on the looks of the Prophet(saw), one can look at the shamaa'el. There isn't such clear books on the "looks" of Allah. All those body parts tend to be part of hadiths/ayah that aren't particularly talking about body parts, but something else.
@@mynameisthis1580 Allāh has Two Blessed Hands which Befits His Majesty, free from any resemblance to any of His creation and as well as His other Attributes. We believe in them as they are mentioned without going into their details. Allāh has Stated He has Two Hands and the Prophet (ﷺ) has affirmed them, we believe in them that they are free from any resemblance and we do not delve into their details. This is the right path.
2. At 21:12 he read مَنْ طَلْبَ العِلْمَ....... Either he doesn't know how to read verbs in arabic or he doesn't know the baab of verbs. It meant to be read as مَنْ طَلَبَ العِلْمَ Bec فعل ماض ثلاثي مجرد ain kalimah is mutaharrik and in this verb it is maftooh
3. At 22:49 he read حُكْمِي بِأَهْلُ الكَلَام........ It's very basic arabic as harf jarr الباء came before اهل and it should give it kasrah but he read with dammah I have no idea why he did that.
@@adamali7891 I checked one of his new clips where he is mentioning nahw books He said قطرة الندى which is قطر الندى I was surprised that even beginners know it
How dangerous is philosophy?! Just look at some of our mainstream daee. Just look it up what philosophy did to them(I don't have to say the name). May Allah guide us.
Read the book Dhamm Al-Kalām wa Ahlihi by or "Condemning Kalām (speculative theology) and Mutakallimeen (practitioners of Kalām)" is a book written by Abu Ismail Abdullah Ibn Muhammad Al-Harawi Al-Ansari, known as Abu Ismail Al-Harawi (396H - 481H).
4. At 22:50 he read أَنْ يَضْرَبُوا...... this part made me believe that he does not know basic arabic. It meant to be ......يُضْرَبُوا..... and this is based on his translation of it at 22: 57. So it should be read majhool I.e. passive voice.
Are you here only to look at the faults of people? I know the shaykh knows Arabic, even if his accent needs a little more work. May Allah guide us all. Ameen.
@@servantofthemostmerciful7985 There is a big difference between accent and grammar mistake. If you know that he knows arabic than can you give an explanation to his mistakes ?
@@alisheikh9630 Do you really think he made a mistake? I heard the translation he gave and he translated in the majhool (passive) and not at all the active (ma’roof) form. He said “they were hit...” and not “they hit...”. You are clearly wrong.
@@servantofthemostmerciful7985 I hope you understood my question it was about his arabic reading according to grammar rules I can't believe where blind following can take one person
@@alisheikh9630 Brother, his accent is not so great. It is not about the reading. It is about his understanding. He understood it well and he knew it was majhool. So what if he could not pronounce it correctly due to his accent? This is his accent and nothing else. Brother, why are you only looking at the faults of people? Aren’t you afraid that people will one day look at your faults? This isn’t even a fault of his as he has no control over his accent. Had he made a grammatical mistake, I would be the first to say so, but he hasn’t.
How would you describe ILM AL KALAM Is it science of discourse; or Islamic scholastic theology; or Speculative theology; or Philosophical study of islamic doctrine! You mulla dudes always confuse us simpletons.
Plz before criticism and swears read carefully if you don't know arabic get it checked by someone who knows arabic grammar and than reply I am happy to take any criticism
1.At 0:26 he said قُبُول with a dammah on ق this changes the meaning. With dammah it is plural of قُبُل which is opposite of دُبُر. Viewers can check dictionary for that. However قَبُول With fathah is masdar which means to accept. He repeated with dammah at 0:55 again.
Imagine offering Sheikh Uthaymeen's interpretation of what Radd is, and using ibn Qudama the student of Abul Faraj ibn Jawzi who was against anthromorphism. Got to love the inability to understand context of radd🤣 Also wasn't ibn Qudama al maqdisi a supporter of the Asharite Ayyubids, I guess he forgot to do his takfeer and refutation of them and their Ashari creed. I can see why people are against throwing out Aqal (rationalism) because if things are critiqued it allows one to see things througha different lens. May Allah ta'ala guide all of us. Ameer!
Ibn qudamah and ibn jawzi didn't believe yall philosophical stuff, they lived among asharis therefore they didn't want to expose themselves lot to be hurtin' by y'all
@@FlammablePunch The only problem with that is, that they lived in Iraq and are arguing they compromised their religion and aqeeda for appeasement🤣 Also, this philosophical dismissal is incorrect, God revealed the Qur'an on a qawn that thinks. Philosophy is the name of the science of thinking. Much like Aqeeda and divisions of tawheed is the word used for the science of eman. The name might be innovated, but the asal is sound in both cases.
Ibn Qudamah wrote in his book, Hikaayat ul-Munaadharah fil-Qur'aan Ma'a Ba'd Ahl il-Bid'ah page 35: “And we do not know amongst the people of innovation, any faction who conceal their saying, and do not have the boldness to proclaim it (openly) except the Heretics (Zanaadiqah) and the Ash'ariyyah.”
How a Salafi debates with an atheist: Atheist: Why do you believe in God? Salafi: Because the Qur'ān says there's a God. Atheist: Well, Why do you believe in the Qur'ān? Salafi: It's the Book of Allāh. Atheist: Ok! Why do you think that It's from Allāh? Salafi: The Qur'ān says so! That's why. That, my friends, is a classical example of circular reasoning. You really can't have a reasonable discussion with these atheists, agnostics and modernists without some prior knowledge of Philosophy, Logic and Ilm-al-Kalām.
Your comment shows the level of your ignorance and that you did not read Quran or even understand it as there are verses clearly respond to athiest and whatsoever you call and the salaf ulema depends on. Even in authentic hadeeth there are responses given. So please learn before you show your ignorance and false claims about salafi and try to apply your philosophical imagination with stupid people.
@@yasserf8809 If an atheist comes upto you and says, "I believe that the universe is eternal". How will you disprove that using only the Qur'ān and Sunnāh? You will have no choice but to resort to Ilm-al-Kalām!
@@Husayn0318 Nope you are wrong again. That has nothing to Do with ilm ulkalam. Simply Science match the Quran and agree in that the universe has a beginning as well as Everything created as mentioned in the Quran . So for what i need ilm ulkalam for?!
@@Husayn0318 Al-Bukhari recorded that Jubayr bin Mut`im said, "I heard the Prophet recite Surat At-Tur in Al-Maghrib prayer and when he reached this Ayah, أَمْ خُلِقُواْ مِنْ غَيْرِ شَىْءٍ أَمْ هُمُ الْخَـلِقُونَ - أَمْ خَلَقُواْ السَّمَـوَتِ وَالاٌّرْضَ بَل لاَّ يُوقِنُونَ - أَمْ عِندَهُمْ خَزَآئِنُ رَبِّكَ أَمْ هُمُ الْمُسَيْطِرُونَ (Or were they created by nothing Or were they themselves the creators Or did they create the heavens and the earth Nay, but they have no firm belief. Or are with them the treasures of your Lord Or are they the tyrants with the authority to do as they like), I felt my heart would fly away." This Hadith is collected in the Two Sahihs using various chains of narration. Jubayr bin Mut`im went to the Messenger of Allah after the battle of Badr to ransom the captured idolators. At that time, he was still an idolator. Hearing the Prophet recite this Ayah was one of the reasons that he later embraced Islam. Ilm ulkalam only leads to innovation without Quran and Sunnah and wht is in Quran and sunnah are enough.
I was thinking highly of him but sorry to say the guy does not even know basic arabic and cannot read basic arabic text in Arabic. Bec of that I will not take deen from him. Also he can do mistake rather big mistakes in understanding the deen from the books of salaf saalih. If he contacts me personally I would point out his mistake. If he wants than he can leave his number and I would contact him.
@@jebrilabdulazeez Brother my intention is to speak to brother and make him aware of his mistakes I have asked to have his number to mention those mistakes I think the brother can represent himself better
@@alisheikh9630 who are you to correct his supposed mistakes? What qualifies you to do that? He has 2 islamic decrees from well credited Islamic universities as well as 2 engineering decrees. By the way he's relating what the scholars have said about ilmul kalaam not what he thinks. History proves that most of students of knowledge and even scholars who went to learn about ilmul kalaam ended up either with clear kufrr or they brought innovation to the religion and I fear for brothers who engage in this today such as Mohammed hijab and his co.
Oh and if you want to listen to someone who coats every ayah,hadith and the aqwal of the scholars in Arabic I advise you to listen to ustaad abdurrahman Hassan on al madrasatu al umariyyah he will even sometimes forget to explain in English but since most people don't know Arabic this ustaad explanations in English is amazing and no doubt he can make mistakes since he's human but so does everyone make mistakes. What matters is what does he's message convey to the public who are mostly lay.
@@MuhammadAli-mz4pq that is not kalam that is permissible. That is falsafah that is antithetical to the Sunnah. Salafis don't have the brains to understand it anyway.
Shaykh uthman is one of those defending the undefedable and minority opinion that any worship without an example of it literally done in the exact form by the prophet pbuh or companions is haram n incurs sin. This is v stupid and historically stupid also. Also in the history of understanding bid'ah rulings in fiqh he should know that without America his preferred definition of bid'ah would stay where it was before Britain installed the sauds as their companions in hijjaz, ie very minority. I urge Muslims to follow the overwhelming majority of scholars over many many decades in understanding the meaning of bid'ah. Some may ask, if it were the majority scholars over decades why is shaykh uthman daring to disagree together with his mostly Saudi lackeys? This is because the founder and popular source of the modern day propagation of this definition of bid'ah, Muhammad bin Abdul wahab, has insanely decreed in his books that almost all Muslims were wayward at his time and he came to correct alllllll these majority scholars and purify their faith! Shaykh uthman is among those falling in this trap of blinded arrogance of daring to consider majority Muslims scholars in so many regions of the world including in his teachers' pre 'Britain installed government' region, as bid'ah practitioners. He probably also believes the act of sitting or being in a specific position is suitable for Allah but in the way Allah wants while sunni know that Allah does not sit or stay anywhere the way we use that word no matter what the definition. So just ignore this wahabi pls.
@@zaid4785 like I said that is a minority and stupid interpretation of the meaning of bid'ah. I repeat: minority. And also inapplicable, even in Saudi. U should read more on why its a minority opinion in vast literature of centuries of islamic scholarship on bid'ah.
This guy knows shit about ilm al kalam and here he's giving dars like he is some shaykh ul islam. First learn what ilm al kalam is and what it is about then talk blah blah
I'm from Japan 🇯🇵
I became Muslim 6 years ago
I had used to read philosophy books (Descartes, Kant, Platon)before being Muslim
Ilmu Karam ...we don't need to know and learn as Muslim
If we apply philosophy thinking , Japanese will not enter to Islam
Japanese will reply and against to Islam by philosophy
Da'wah by Quran and Sunnah and Akhraaq and Good Adab... it's enough
Islam is composed by Quran and Sunnah , just 2.
Not + Ilmu Karam
Thats good to hear brother/or sister. May Allah keep you steadfast!. Asalamu3lkum from U.S
What a great post Allhamdulliah. Assalamualaykum my brother from Japan
I think ive never heard a Japanese being a muslim (with all due respect)
May Allah guide you to success in this life and in the next
arigato akhi
jazakallah khair
Jazzakallah khair for sharing and may Allah bless you and bring your family and people to Islam.
The imam at my masjid done taraweeh in Tokyo during Ramadan 2019 and was very impressed with Japanese people and their values as they are very similar to Islam in many ways
May Allah preserve you shyakh ❤️
Masha'Allah! This noble brother is upon haqq.
the noble shaykh is best i heard in english and true path
He is upon Wahhabism. And completely ignorant of the Ilm Al Kalam. The Haq word doesn’t fit there.
@@roshanburgai3902wAhAbIsM 😢😢🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺
@@roshanburgai3902 😂 what's a wahabi jaahil grave worshipper 😂
Maasha Allaah a very important lecture. May Allaah bless shaykh uthman with khair, Ameen
Ameen! Are you from Mozambique brother?
Jazakallahu khair for this.
Watching this video on the day Br. Mohammad Hijab Challenged Br. Abdur Rahman Hassan on a debate on 'Ilm ul Kalam. Also it's almost Ramadan 1442. Taqabal Allahu mina wa minkum. This was a much needed refresher for me. Thank you Ustadh! May Allah aza wajjal guide us all to the Correct Aqeeda. Ameen.
Ameen, Alhamdulillah I’m also watching this due to the challenge M Hijab gave Ustadh Abdulrahman
@@abuhasan8055 you are deviant brother
@@mesutozil7903 are you out of your mind
@@abuhasan8055 Mo Hijab is an ignorant clown.
He will bully anyone who points out his mistakes.
Allahumma barik Sheikh Uthman ibn Farooq
Jazakumu Allahu ghayran!
JazakAllah khairan ya Sheikh I love your aqeeda series,very beneficial. I learned a lot!
I have a question: why many great imams of Islam such as Nawawi took from Ash'ari aqeeda (considering that their knowledge was very big)?
Kamila Sak Even the knowledge can make mistakes that’s why we follow the evidences
I had the same questions and I think I found why so.
First of all, Nawawi (and other muhaddiths like ibn Hajar al Athqalani) had some VIEWS of Ash'ari aqeeda. There's a difference between to be an Asha'riy and have some similar views with them.
Secondly, ummah did not recognized them for their aqeeda, but rather for their huuuuge efforts in knowledge of hadeeth. For example, ibn Hajar is famous of giving the best commentary to imam Bukhari's Sahih. And Nawawi is famous of giving the best commentary to imam Muslim's Sahih.
What is the evidence that this great imaam was asha,ri ?
Why does the earliest aqeedah video I can find start from episode 30?
@@Anon-uv9mj go to playlists on the channel and go to the bottom the whole series is there
Barakallahu feekum
As salaamu alaikum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatahu. Jazak Allahu khair
Just wondering the microphone the shaykh is using, the camera he is using, the app he is using to give dawah - are coming from Quran and Sunnah?
22:10 I heard Molana Tariq Jameel.
Same
Assalamu alaykum, we are missing the last video about the names of Allah swt. It stopped in number 102. Can you upload it? Jazakallahu khairan
i love ilmol qalam mantiq balagha and qira'a. to understand the truth of islam by studying ilmol qalam.
I thought Ibn Abbas (ra) made tawil of a verse.
I saw this video months ago and i read the title and had two thoughts. One was like "But i thought this was Ash'ari thing and haram". Then i thought to myself that maybe Uthman Ibn Farooq hafidhahullah is simply explaining why it is not what the Salaf as Salih used and why we should not use, study Kalam. The latter is clearly correct.
I originally saw Ustadh Abdurrahman Hassan and Shahid from 'Al Madrasatu Al Umariyyah' channels Hot stet Podcast where they discussed Ash'arism and the statements of the great Ulama of the Salaf were mentioned like the statement of Imam shafi'i rahimahullah. Also the statements of Fakh Al Din Al Razi and Al Ghazali were mentioned and how Ilm ul Kalam has no use what so ever. Worse, it is confusing and philosophy IS confusing without any doubt. So *if these experts of Kalam at the end of their lives were regretful of them wasting with Kalam, we see that is is clearly not useful* .
Now i know a bit more and this information is obviously very useful. The small amount i discussed with Wannabe philosophers, i saw how irrational they were even though they tried to act as if they were rational.
@abbas abdullah Sure, what ever you say، شخص عادي
@@mohamudahmed6554 Yeah.
السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته
Which book are your reading from بارك الله فيك
Lum’atul I’tiqad by Ibn Qudamah (R.A)
37:00
25:15 so we shouldn't learn about science, math, etc.?
Asalām-Alaykum. I understood what is Kalām and Ilm Ul-Kalām but I did not understand Mantiq.
Of course you did not understand, he didnt even define it really...listen to what he says from 7:26 and onwards, it does not make any sense, he is unclear and jumps. Mantiq is door to kalam or it is sitting down and speculating and talking about things...this is what i got from this video.
@@AbbasAli-ov4gj
Asalām-Alaykum dear brother. No offense to you my brother, it is best to be respectful to the Sheikh. I understood what Mantiq is afterwards, this was an old comment. He does explains it, it is explained I would say, in a small amount.
The Sheikh has said that in other to debate with each other, they would lay down some common terms, grounds or rules.
So, in brief; philosophy has Logic, perhaps if one would say as a branch. It has a set of rules applied in an argument or in a debate that one has to abide by, in order to come to a better state of reasoning or a conclusion.
All of this is based upon the limited understanding of men, all of this is rejected and has no place in the religion of Allāh.
Mantiq is just the Arabic word for Logic. Logic is the gateway to Kalaam, which is a logical look at Islamic theology.
There were two main and one minor school of theology during that early period of Islam: (1) Asharai (2) Maturidi and (3) Athari.
Ahmed ibn Humbel (as noted in ibn rajab) said that Allah has "yad" but that isn't a body part. A word can have a literal meaning, a metaphorical meaning, or a technical meaning in the sharia. He said the word had a technical meaning in the sharia, and we don't know what that is.
He affirms the word as an attribute of Allah, but rejects it as a body part.
The hambalis had Asharis in them and Al-lal Athar. Some of the later groups were anthropomorphism.
There are clear books on the looks of the Prophet(saw), one can look at the shamaa'el. There isn't such clear books on the "looks" of Allah. All those body parts tend to be part of hadiths/ayah that aren't particularly talking about body parts, but something else.
@@mynameisthis1580
Allāh has Two Blessed Hands which Befits His Majesty, free from any resemblance to any of His creation and as well as His other Attributes.
We believe in them as they are mentioned without going into their details. Allāh has Stated He has Two Hands and the Prophet (ﷺ) has affirmed them, we believe in them that they are free from any resemblance and we do not delve into their details.
This is the right path.
Wednesday, 21 June 2023
2. At 21:12 he read
مَنْ طَلْبَ العِلْمَ.......
Either he doesn't know how to read verbs in arabic or he doesn't know the baab of verbs.
It meant to be read as
مَنْ طَلَبَ العِلْمَ
Bec فعل ماض ثلاثي مجرد ain kalimah is mutaharrik and in this verb it is maftooh
WHAT book are you explaniing sheik??
Lum’atul I’tiqad by Ibn Qudamah (R.A)
That mention of molana tariq jamil😂23:00
22:09 😂
kind of smooth
3. At 22:49 he read
حُكْمِي بِأَهْلُ الكَلَام........
It's very basic arabic as harf jarr الباء came before اهل and it should give it kasrah but he read with dammah
I have no idea why he did that.
I don't know if it's nerves but he makes these mistakes round the clock.
@@adamali7891
I checked one of his new clips where he is mentioning nahw books
He said قطرة الندى which is قطر الندى
I was surprised that even beginners know it
How dangerous is philosophy?! Just look at some of our mainstream daee. Just look it up what philosophy did to them(I don't have to say the name). May Allah guide us.
Read the book Dhamm Al-Kalām wa Ahlihi by or "Condemning Kalām (speculative theology) and Mutakallimeen (practitioners of Kalām)" is a book written by Abu Ismail Abdullah Ibn Muhammad Al-Harawi Al-Ansari, known as Abu Ismail Al-Harawi (396H - 481H).
Also, watch this series as well, this will illustrate to you some of its harms.
czcams.com/play/PLX3yMQTyU8CUoAB0nMnisDCWFOny-zFsC.html
22:08 sneaky XD
Idgi
There's a deviant speaker in pakistan, Maulana Tariq Jameel, he does this people pleasing, telling people fabricated stories to impress them.
@@nashitkhan9611 oh ok lol
4. At 22:50 he read
أَنْ يَضْرَبُوا......
this part made me believe that he does not know basic arabic.
It meant to be
......يُضْرَبُوا.....
and this is based on his translation of it at 22: 57.
So it should be read majhool I.e. passive voice.
Are you here only to look at the faults of people? I know the shaykh knows Arabic, even if his accent needs a little more work. May Allah guide us all. Ameen.
@@servantofthemostmerciful7985
There is a big difference between accent and grammar mistake.
If you know that he knows arabic than can you give an explanation to his mistakes ?
@@alisheikh9630 Do you really think he made a mistake? I heard the translation he gave and he translated in the majhool (passive) and not at all the active (ma’roof) form. He said “they were hit...” and not “they hit...”. You are clearly wrong.
@@servantofthemostmerciful7985
I hope you understood my question it was about his arabic reading according to grammar rules
I can't believe where blind following can take one person
@@alisheikh9630 Brother, his accent is not so great. It is not about the reading. It is about his understanding. He understood it well and he knew it was majhool. So what if he could not pronounce it correctly due to his accent? This is his accent and nothing else. Brother, why are you only looking at the faults of people? Aren’t you afraid that people will one day look at your faults? This isn’t even a fault of his as he has no control over his accent. Had he made a grammatical mistake, I would be the first to say so, but he hasn’t.
22:08 oops 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
How would you describe ILM AL KALAM
Is it science of discourse; or
Islamic scholastic theology; or
Speculative theology; or
Philosophical study of islamic doctrine!
You mulla dudes always confuse us simpletons.
According to mutakalim islam maulana ilyas ghumman it is defending the true beliefs and refuting the heritical beliefs however it may be
22:10 Maulana Tariq Jameel 😂
I am a Christian. Just trying not to be ignorant
Plz before criticism and swears read carefully if you don't know arabic get it checked by someone who knows arabic grammar and than reply
I am happy to take any criticism
listen to asrar rashid
1.At 0:26 he said قُبُول with a dammah on ق this changes the meaning. With dammah it is plural of قُبُل which is opposite of دُبُر. Viewers can check dictionary for that.
However قَبُول With fathah is masdar which means to accept.
He repeated with dammah at 0:55 again.
Yeah. He makes these mistakes sometimes while reading mutoon. Doesn't think much of it.
He makes many blunders in his readings of the mutoon.
This is from Nabi Muhammad s.a.w. and NOT from Ham bin Nuh a.s. YOU OK?
Our Lady Of Lourdes what are you talking about?
@@MasjidRibat Ruqyah Sihir now. Difficult to explain 46 Nubuwwah 1 Ruqyah
Our Lady Of Lourdes I am not sure if there is a language barrier here but I have no idea what you are talking about
@@MasjidRibat I've explained. Goodbye
Our Lady Of Lourdes no you really have not
Ibn taymiyyah limited the hands of Allah to having 2 hands 🙌. BLASPHEMY
Imagine offering Sheikh Uthaymeen's interpretation of what Radd is, and using ibn Qudama the student of Abul Faraj ibn Jawzi who was against anthromorphism. Got to love the inability to understand context of radd🤣
Also wasn't ibn Qudama al maqdisi a supporter of the Asharite Ayyubids, I guess he forgot to do his takfeer and refutation of them and their Ashari creed.
I can see why people are against throwing out Aqal (rationalism) because if things are critiqued it allows one to see things througha different lens.
May Allah ta'ala guide all of us. Ameer!
*Ameen!
Ibn qudamah and ibn jawzi didn't believe yall philosophical stuff, they lived among asharis therefore they didn't want to expose themselves lot to be hurtin' by y'all
@@FlammablePunch The only problem with that is, that they lived in Iraq and are arguing they compromised their religion and aqeeda for appeasement🤣
Also, this philosophical dismissal is incorrect, God revealed the Qur'an on a qawn that thinks. Philosophy is the name of the science of thinking. Much like Aqeeda and divisions of tawheed is the word used for the science of eman. The name might be innovated, but the asal is sound in both cases.
@@yourstruly5706 go and check how Ibn qudamah refuted the asharis
Ibn Qudamah wrote in his book, Hikaayat ul-Munaadharah fil-Qur'aan Ma'a Ba'd Ahl il-Bid'ah page 35: “And we do not know amongst the people of innovation, any faction who conceal their saying, and do not have the boldness to proclaim it (openly) except the Heretics (Zanaadiqah) and the Ash'ariyyah.”
How a Salafi debates with an atheist:
Atheist: Why do you believe in God?
Salafi: Because the Qur'ān says there's a God.
Atheist: Well, Why do you believe in the Qur'ān?
Salafi: It's the Book of Allāh.
Atheist: Ok! Why do you think that It's from Allāh?
Salafi: The Qur'ān says so! That's why.
That, my friends, is a classical example of circular reasoning.
You really can't have a reasonable discussion with these atheists, agnostics and modernists without some prior knowledge of Philosophy, Logic and Ilm-al-Kalām.
Your comment shows the level of your ignorance and that you did not read Quran or even understand it as there are verses clearly respond to athiest and whatsoever you call and the salaf ulema depends on. Even in authentic hadeeth there are responses given.
So please learn before you show your ignorance and false claims about salafi and try to apply your philosophical imagination with stupid people.
@@yasserf8809 If an atheist comes upto you and says, "I believe that the universe is eternal".
How will you disprove that using only the Qur'ān and Sunnāh? You will have no choice but to resort to Ilm-al-Kalām!
@@Husayn0318
Nope you are wrong again. That has nothing to Do with ilm ulkalam. Simply Science match the Quran and agree in that the universe has a beginning as well as Everything created as mentioned in the Quran . So for what i need ilm ulkalam for?!
@@yasserf8809 Thank you for agreeing with me :)
@@Husayn0318
Al-Bukhari recorded that Jubayr bin Mut`im said, "I heard the Prophet recite Surat At-Tur in Al-Maghrib prayer and when he reached this Ayah,
أَمْ خُلِقُواْ مِنْ غَيْرِ شَىْءٍ أَمْ هُمُ الْخَـلِقُونَ - أَمْ خَلَقُواْ السَّمَـوَتِ وَالاٌّرْضَ بَل لاَّ يُوقِنُونَ - أَمْ عِندَهُمْ خَزَآئِنُ رَبِّكَ أَمْ هُمُ الْمُسَيْطِرُونَ
(Or were they created by nothing Or were they themselves the creators Or did they create the heavens and the earth Nay, but they have no firm belief. Or are with them the treasures of your Lord Or are they the tyrants with the authority to do as they like), I felt my heart would fly away." This Hadith is collected in the Two Sahihs using various chains of narration. Jubayr bin Mut`im went to the Messenger of Allah after the battle of Badr to ransom the captured idolators. At that time, he was still an idolator. Hearing the Prophet recite this Ayah was one of the reasons that he later embraced Islam.
Ilm ulkalam only leads to innovation without Quran and Sunnah and wht is in Quran and sunnah are enough.
im doubting the knowledge of this man
Your reason?
@@iimiboy because his arabic reading is like a primary school student. There are some videos on youtube, check it
@@RIMJANESSOHMALOOG and your Arabic is good yea? I know your referring to them 2 clowns who can't speak English let alone Arabic
I was thinking highly of him but sorry to say the guy does not even know basic arabic and cannot read basic arabic text in Arabic. Bec of that I will not take deen from him.
Also he can do mistake rather big mistakes in understanding the deen from the books of salaf saalih.
If he contacts me personally I would point out his mistake.
If he wants than he can leave his number and I would contact him.
@@agadirand4four347 more than 3 places
If some body can leave the number than I can explain the mistakes
You say he doesn't know basic Arabic but wrote huge books in Arabic and has many ijazas from many scholars.
@@jebrilabdulazeez
Brother my intention is to speak to brother and make him aware of his mistakes
I have asked to have his number to mention those mistakes
I think the brother can represent himself better
@@alisheikh9630 who are you to correct his supposed mistakes? What qualifies you to do that? He has 2 islamic decrees from well credited Islamic universities as well as 2 engineering decrees. By the way he's relating what the scholars have said about ilmul kalaam not what he thinks. History proves that most of students of knowledge and even scholars who went to learn about ilmul kalaam ended up either with clear kufrr or they brought innovation to the religion and I fear for brothers who engage in this today such as Mohammed hijab and his co.
Oh and if you want to listen to someone who coats every ayah,hadith and the aqwal of the scholars in Arabic I advise you to listen to ustaad abdurrahman Hassan on al madrasatu al umariyyah he will even sometimes forget to explain in English but since most people don't know Arabic this ustaad explanations in English is amazing and no doubt he can make mistakes since he's human but so does everyone make mistakes. What matters is what does he's message convey to the public who are mostly lay.
Ahistorical Salafi oft-repeated nonsense!!!
Imam Abu Ismail Al-Harawi have written a book called Damm wa Kalam, it gathers about 1000+ narrations of the Salaf condemning it.
@@MuhammadAli-mz4pq that is not kalam that is permissible. That is falsafah that is antithetical to the Sunnah. Salafis don't have the brains to understand it anyway.
Shaykh uthman is one of those defending the undefedable and minority opinion that any worship without an example of it literally done in the exact form by the prophet pbuh or companions is haram n incurs sin. This is v stupid and historically stupid also. Also in the history of understanding bid'ah rulings in fiqh he should know that without America his preferred definition of bid'ah would stay where it was before Britain installed the sauds as their companions in hijjaz, ie very minority. I urge Muslims to follow the overwhelming majority of scholars over many many decades in understanding the meaning of bid'ah. Some may ask, if it were the majority scholars over decades why is shaykh uthman daring to disagree together with his mostly Saudi lackeys? This is because the founder and popular source of the modern day propagation of this definition of bid'ah, Muhammad bin Abdul wahab, has insanely decreed in his books that almost all Muslims were wayward at his time and he came to correct alllllll these majority scholars and purify their faith! Shaykh uthman is among those falling in this trap of blinded arrogance of daring to consider majority Muslims scholars in so many regions of the world including in his teachers' pre 'Britain installed government' region, as bid'ah practitioners. He probably also believes the act of sitting or being in a specific position is suitable for Allah but in the way Allah wants while sunni know that Allah does not sit or stay anywhere the way we use that word no matter what the definition. So just ignore this wahabi pls.
@@zaid4785 like I said that is a minority and stupid interpretation of the meaning of bid'ah. I repeat: minority. And also inapplicable, even in Saudi. U should read more on why its a minority opinion in vast literature of centuries of islamic scholarship on bid'ah.
Brother you comment has nothing but blaming and slandering
This guy knows shit about ilm al kalam and here he's giving dars like he is some shaykh ul islam. First learn what ilm al kalam is and what it is about then talk blah blah
#onemessagefoundation