Tesla Model 3 (2018) Frontal Crash Test
Vložit
- čas přidán 19. 09. 2018
- This is the NHTSA NCAP frontal crash test for 2018 Tesla Model 3 (RWD/Long Range)
The car achieves the lowest probability of injury of any vehicle ever tested by NHTSA.
NHTSA New Car Assessment Program (NCAP) Frontal Impact:
The frontal crash test evaluates injury to the head, neck, chest, and legs of the driver and front seat passenger. Crash test dummies representing an average-sized adult male and a small-sized adult female are placed in the driver and front passenger seats, respectively, and are secured with seat belts. Vehicles are crashed into a fixed barrier at 35 mph (56.3km/h), which is equivalent to a head-on collision between two similar vehicles each moving at 35 mph. 1 star is the lowest rating; 5 stars is the highest. More stars equal safer cars.
Overall Rating: 5-Star
Overall Front Star Rating: 5-Star
Front Driver Side: 5-Star
Front Passenger Side: 5-Star
Overall Side Star Rating: 5-Star
Combined Side Barrier and Pole Ratings (Front Seat): 5-Star
Combined Side Barrier and Pole Ratings (Rear Seat): 5-Star
Side Barrier Rating: 5-Star
Side Barrier (Driver): 5-Star
Side Barrier (Rear Passenger): 5-Star
Rollover Star Rating: 5-Star
The rollover rating measures the risk of rollover in a single-vehicle, loss-of-control scenario.
Buying a Tesla? Use this Tesla referral code and get $100 Supercharging credit for your Model S, Model X or Model 3:
www.tesla.com/referral/albert...
CrashNet1 is a crash test video database with a collection of over 1,500 crash tests. Videos include test footages of late model vehicles, vintage car crash tests, child seat crash tests and more. We'd love to have you as a subscriber.
Browse test videos: / crashnet1 - Auta a dopravní prostředky
Finally, we get results
Looks very safe... wouldn't expect less from Musk. Can't wait to see it in IIHS's small overlap tests...
Evi1M4chine sounds like someone is jealous!
Like every other car. This got no better rating than a VW Golf. I wouldn't expect anything less from any other manufacturer either. Every single manufacturer's current cars are full 5 star rated. So nothing special here.
do u like ppl on drugs?
Yes but at least he knows the engineering behind it. People underestimate the importance of leadership... Without proper leadership. Things get nowhere...
sure, why dont you get in the car & do it again?
That front part still had like half a meter more cushion to go.
Euro NCAP tests at 40 Mph with a 40% frontal impact. That is a lot more difficult. This one is relatively easy.
From their description:
Frontal crashes are responsible for more deaths and serious injuries than any other accident type. A typical scenario is a head-on collision between two oncoming cars at moderately high speeds. In most collisions of this type, only a part of the vehicle front width structure is involved, i.e. the two colliding vehicles are offset.
In the full-scale test, the car is driven at 64km/h and with 40 percent overlap into a deformable barrier which represents the oncoming vehicle. The test replicates a crash between two cars of the same weight, both travelling at a speed of 50km/h. Two frontal impact dummies representing the average male are seated in the front and child dummies are placed in child restraints in the rear seats.
In this crash, the vehicle structure is put to the test. Limited structural engagement may expose occupants to increased intrusions. Crash forces have to be efficiently directed to parts of the car where the energy can be efficiently and safely absorbed. The front crumple zone must collapse in a controlled way, leaving the passenger compartment as undeformed as possible. Rearward movement of the steering wheel and the pedals must be limited if serious injuries are to be avoided.
It scored maximum points on the Euro NCAP 40% frontal impact offset test.
No wonder they crashed, Driver put a metric ton of colorful makeups it glued her eyes shut, couldn't see the road.
What a Dummy.
These are dummies and are meant to crash. Aka not real people or coditions.
It crashed because the driver was a WOMAN dummy. helllooooo???
@@jacksonbangs6603 WOOOOSH
Wow. Did the windshield even crack??!!
I believe it did, along the right side. You can see it in the overhead shots at the end.
?
It did, look at right side at 1:09
The windshield did not even crack than the other cars awesome 👏
That is amazing I don;t think I have ever seen a car handle it that well.
You clearly have not watched many crash test videos then. You are so ignorant. Look at the crash tests of a C Class, a VW Passat, a Volvo S90 all of which performs better in their crash tests.
@@SDav21 quiet please. That's all I can feed you with.
@@rueben44 You simply need to watch more videos because the ignorance is tangible.
5 Star...Best that can be scored. Ignorance is tangle. :)
@@rueben44 A car can not score more than 5. The scoring system is 0 to 5 stars. Simple.
Looks better than the good old favorite Veedub Beetle.
However, how does she fare at a more dangerous speed like 80mph (100kph)?
Also, the 4inch offset crash which simulates drifting into the opposite lane causing a near miss hit swerving to avoid headon collission is a wee bit more regular occuring.
Where is the 40% frontal overlap test? i want to see how it performs on that...
how is it on EuroNCAP? would be good to compare. Also, how better it is than an ICE.
Did they remove the battery?
Does anyone know what sweet the car had as it crashed ???
At what speed is this occurring?
At which speed was this ?
0:05 the dummy is like "What the fuck?!?!"
wow you would just have to replace the front end.... batteries okay, all rear drive components ok
35 mph (56 km/h)
Looks good but i hope they do something about that big screen someone reported that during an accident his hand crushed the screen
*T E S L A I S L I F E*
Quite literally.
No man. Not for me. It's so boring to drive. I don't think I can drive them for more than a mile without falling a sleep from boredom. 2 pedal cars are simply not for me.
no Man..IS DEAD...FIRE FIRE WHEN YOU CRAHS WITH OTHER CAR FOR YOUR BATERIS
Más velocidad
NCAP? EUROCAP? Who did this crash test. It didnt look like the industry standard 43mph.
Speed?
60kph
Anyone else think the dummy bled at 0:41? lol
The top test is small overlap crash test and i do not see any bag head protection
Watch the multi car test going over multi speed bumps in sequence. The Tesla breaks apart and explodes catching fire
The machine pulling the car forward is noisier than the car itself lol
The Test Car has no battery ;-)
Хорошо когда машина безопасна! Лайк тесловцам!
Long time
Показали бы лучше боковой удар - по батареям - вот это будет интересно ..))
The only flaw is that the door is electronic release for the rear so if the electronics die in the accident the rear doors don’t open
Or, maybe, just maybe, the people in the front can get out then open the rear doors from the outside.
Amm ol true but still would be better if there was a mechanical emergency latch and it’s really rare for the power to go out in an accident but still it’s better
They do have a mechanical mechanism
Sandro Silva only the front have a emergency release not the back it only has an electronic button
where's the fire ???? dont they go up in flames?
If this was a gasoline vehicle, the engine would crushed my knees.
What? That's not even true at all. Most traditional ICE vehicles nowadays do just fine in front crash tests. Hell, just look at the Honda Civic. This isn't unique to Tesla or the Model 3.
Just look at the NHTSA front collision scores of ICE cars in this price range... They're almost all the same rating.
Look at the crumpling in this Model 3 front... that space left there easily fits the engine. At these speeds crumpling isn't much of a problem.
Wow but you are so ignorant. The engine in an ICE vehicle NEVER intrudes into the cabin. It is designed to break away. Lol. You're so silly. Look at every other crash test of even smaller cars. There is absolutely NO intrusion into the passenger space whatsoever which is why basically every single car today has a 5 star rating.
my volvo built in the early 70s has engine mounts that are designed to sheer in a front end collision and go underneath the car, avoiding the passengers in the cabin.
@@SDav21
Internal combustion engine breaks away in frontal collision? Come on, it'll break your legs first
yeah! bring some to europe and we do a proper test at EuroNCAP.
No
Too bad Model 3 isn't approved for Europe yet... Doesn't look like it will be anytime soon.
It isn't approved for Europe, because their already know that will get bad score at EuroNCAP.
Maybe, although that wouldn't be stopping Tesla. EuroNCAP is voluntary anyway, they could market their car by pointing to the less strict NHTSA safety test, most customers have no idea that there are differences.
The Model 3 isn't going to be approved for Europe due to design elements though, like the central touchscreen controlling everything. They'd have to make an entirely different, more "traditional" Model 3 design to sell in Europe. And that would go against their ideals.
No, that is not truth model 3 is on ours websites already with the same caracteristics as american version is a question of time to star selling in our market, and euroncap is not voluntary, every year euroncap select brands and models relevants for our domestic market or one which is particularly important in a certain market segment, then euroncap buy directly and anonymously at least four car required for test on dealership, they conduct the "PROPER" test and publish the results generaly this test will have huge impact on sells in our market.
Crash testing for dummies.
If it was given anything other than a 5 star rating, Elon would have sued you for slander.
I am a huge fan of Tesla and Elon, Evs, but... kind of weird to me it gets 5 stars. Maybe the car is not damaged much, but what about the organs of passengers? The controlled zone of impact here is very short, means, the deceleration force goes into passenger bodies smashing lungs onto the front window... Yes I know the mannequins have impact sensors, but how did they measure how human body would react to such brutal stop? What about the necks, brains, other vital organs?
The crumple zone here is much larger than almost every other car on the market. That's what makes it so safe. Obviously, it's not 100% safe, just safer than most cars.
The 5 star rating includes the condition of the passengers
Just don't hit a rock or some road debris, rips into the undercarriage battery and up in flames the Tesla goes..
thudtheace cause rocks can cut through titanium
Damn, true.
I love seeing rocks hitting the fuel tank firing cars up every day in the morning.
@@maximilianendes1291
Haha😁
increase that speed by another 40mph (actual speed people drive ) and that tesla will kill everyone inside
ealiev60 oh stfu already
75MPH into a fixed barrier is very likely to kill people from internal injuries, even if the passenger cage is preserved, regardless of car model.
There already was a highway speed Model 3 crash into a concrete barrier with the driver walking away unharmed.
I doubt it was a full 75MPH directly head on like this test (as suggested by ealev60). Usually at least some breaking is applied, and the collision is not perfectly straight on.
And how is that any different from any other car, especially ones with a large hunk of metal in the trunk?