Is domestic violence really caused by 'gender inequality'?
Vložit
- čas přidán 24. 10. 2017
- Senator Leyonhjelm continues to try and find out why government programs, centred around preventing domestic violence, continue to claim that 'gender inequality' is the main catalyst for domestic violence, despite all the evidence to the contrary.
Keep poking holes in their garbage Leyo!
OldFox I bet u can smell the bs fumes sizzling out lol
Good enough for a poke.
He didn't really poke holes. If you listen carefully he just questioned more or less 3 things over the debate
@@arnavrawat9864Maybe you should brush up on the English language, he poked holes in their delusion and asked questioned inbetween their nonsense. Dumb a*s you are.
I swear Leyonhjelm is the only politician in Australia going out of his way to question the government. Keep it up man! Be it self-defense, freedom of speech, airsoft, cannabis, the drug war, the nanny state and more, you are the one championing the fight against insanity. LDP needs someone in the seat of every state as their first goal, then increase the numbers.
Scott Morrison is doing a great job now
But LeyonhJelm for future leader
He's becoming an Aussie version of Tray Gowdy. And thank God somone is asking the hard questions . This is getting way out of hand and has to be getting called for what it is.
@@RippedMoFuCk oh Aus is a billion years ahead of europe and canada at the mo
I am surprised nobody assassinated him yet.
This feminists arent prepared to debate their shit at all and can only repeat the same thing on and on.
Don't forget Fraser Anning.
This should be mandatory viewing for all Australians...
What a load of feminist garbage. Citing studies, web sites etc with no citations or references. Instant 'fail' if you did that in an exam or thesis at any University !!
Wilson they get away with it until they're called on the carpet and held accountable by men like Leyo
@@talldarkhandsome8587 They also did a $250,000 ad campaign using the same BS ideology. Leyo tore strips off them for also doing that, plus wasting taxpayers $$$.
Wilson Well they deserve all the criticism they receive. I love this Leyo gent. Wish we had more like him in the US.
Is it just me or does this seem like a huge waste of time and resources
The amount of evasiveness is a joke. They know they're shooting themselves in the heads if they answer straight up, so they go straight into damage control. 30 million taxpayer dollars to provide, at best, these folks wages...
QE ornotQE don’t assume they are gonna get off anytime soon a rat doesn’t stop feeding forever just cause the lights turn on they’ll just be back leeching off while u wonder where all this rat shit came from
They don't need to lie anymore. The scientific papers doing the lying now. Check hoax papers in Joe Rogan podcasts.
@@Suchen_Wahrheit yeah. They just fudge facts now.
In fact, domestic violence, by our best studies provided through the highest institutions like Harvard, suggest it’s much more 50:50.
But of course they don’t care about male victims.
So they need lane little fudged stats studies to support the only demographic they care to help.
I can’t believe these type of meetings are entertained. It’s a waste of senators time. His time is valuable.
I know it's a bit off topic, but funding being funneled into wages above all else seems to be the way mental health services are going too these days. Far too many people caring far too much about their pay packet and far, FAR, too little about their patients!
These women have dodging abilities that rival even Neo from The Matrix!!!
"If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball"
Lmao😁. It was an embarrasment!!!
How can you tell when a woman is lying? Her mouth is open.
Fuck me I thought you said dogging abilities!! Ha
"Is there a question?" Yeah, I think there's a bloody great big 30 million dollar question.
What a crazy world we live in, where mgtow is degraded (along with everything else that isn't getting with the program).
Most days I'm very happy, but every so often I ponder on disappointing factors in our society, today is one of those days.
@vidocq Totally different. Look at who has the money and cultural backing. And who is causing issues. MRA's have a noble goal, but they won't win any battles. PUA's are like the french dude from the matrix, they just try to have fun with the broken system.
MGTOW are just a bunch of dudes chilling until the whole thing sorts itself out. Such as Leo Di Caprio.
These people are paid huge salaries. They were asked by a Senator to supply answers to questions. They didn't do it. They turned up to another meeting and they still hadn't prepared those answers. As far as we know they still haven't. If I did this I would lose my job. At the very least these incompetent people should be given a written warning. If not, then they manager should be given a written warning.
Just shows you in this world, the government is the biggest waster of money.
Funny how women who get 30 million dollars of mostly Male paid tax dollars say domestic violence against women isnt taken seriously and is dismissed and claim women are victims of inequality. The irony of their very existent is completely lost.....30 million to tell lies and do nothing seems like alot of caring to me.
Dave XB they all need to be sacked and replaced with intelligent people who will do their job properly and not just push their bs agendas that support vagina and suppresses the dick due to wife tales.
@@arkhamkillzone The problem with the way these departments are set up is that there are no contrarians within the department fighting back against the narrative. The department has inbuilt bias, and in order for the department to stay alive and keep people employed, they need to justify their own existence by showing there's a problem that needs fixing *by them* . It's a serious problem, and it should be painfully obvious to anyone that this kind of setup is corrupt from the beginning. We have the same problem in science of researchers trying desperately to confirm their hypothesis so they can receive funding, so they fudge findings and manipulate data to show they were correct. At least the peer review system exists within the scientific world, but it really doesn't exist within government; at least, not in a way that is as effective. These hearings are the best pieces of peer review we have.
LOL a woman in a gov job getting a written warning !! That will be the day!!
“Untouchable protected white woman privilege” “ya can’t even go there”
She would cry and claim harassment!
Ask them what they are doing about the very high rates of violence in lesbian relationships
Campaigning against it while raising awareness. If not now then it will definitely be addressed
Feminist: Sorry, but there’s no data collected on women perpetrators of violence.
best comment
I know right 😂😂😂 Lesbian couples are higher at risk of domestic violence than straight couples
The assertion isn't supported by EVIDENCE, it's supported by a list of OTHER EVIDENCE-FREE ASSERTIONS.
alexolife as it usually is
Alot of soft science articles love doing this. Even in biology. They will cite "omg climate change will absolutely obliterate these creatures", and then you go to the cited article, and it cites something else. I swear it is a citation train longer than the great wall of china.
Senator Leyonhjelm has a way of rationally cutting through all the crap and getting to the core of any issue. Wish we had politicians like that in Canada.
The question is bloody obvious to anyone who is not totally incompetent and extremely arrogant. Just because it was phrased as a statement, does not justify avoiding the question based on semantics.
Just imagine in your work in private enterprise, if you got 30 million dollars for a project. Then it was pointed out to you that you had failed to provide any citations or empirical evidence to support the basis of your project, that you had failed to focus on the most important aspects of the issue and that you had failed to produce any results for that 30 million dollars.
Would your response be: "Is there a question?"
How long do you think you would have a job in say marketing or if that was your response?
And that is just imaging you were in private enterprise. These people are supposed to be doing something about a very serious problem in our society where people's lives are at risk. Instead they are wasting taxpayers money pushing their own debunked agenda.
The response simply illustrates that all the power lies with feminism and feminists like these. They are the ruling ideology and they know it. Which is why they can be so arrogant to a Senator and to taxpayers.
It illustrates that there is a power imbalance all right. Except the imbalance is the opposite way to what they claim.
If Senator Leyonhjelm keeps the heat on these feminist groups I am going to have to join the Liberal Democrats.
'we believe' is another way of saying 'this is what I want to believe'
What a load of feminist garbage. Citing studies, web sites etc with no citations or references. Instant 'fail' if you did that in an exam or thesis at any University !!
@@wilson2455 I bet these whamen have done gender studies degrees and had had years of being told whamen are oppressed. they are now justifying their well paid jobs with this nonsense.
Senator Leyonhjelm you sir need to be the Prime Minister of this once great country. It's about time we had a politician who stands up and questions the so-called Government and their sectors. Someone who looks at our so-called freedoms. It's great to see we have a wolf amongst the sheep. Keep up the great work mate.
This gentleman is a one last standing man in world of insanity. I really admire him and support him.
he still believes in the pay gap tho
"it's not our job to go through our website and check every citation" wow...
Basically, they’re saying they don’t have to have evidence back up any of their assertions.
THEN WHO'S JOB IS THAT? Indeed... "wow". Talk about being completely in denial.
@@veetour I think you would find that plenty of modern, sophisticated research from a number of prestigious institutions would enable them to make the assertions that they are making - such as UN women, WHO etc
Of course, if you go down and look at their sources, it's just going to be a group of articles referencing other articles that man bad, woman good. It's the academic version of a reddit circlejerk/echo chamber, much like how science was fabricated about MSG. Articles citing each other, to form a web of absolute unfounded horseshit. And the science subjects most affected by this are of course, the soft sciences - psychology, biology etc.
It's a way of saying they're not responsible for the rubbish they generate.
I'd love to see more politicians like him demanding more scrutiny like this. They'd clearly looked for research works that backed their narrative and glossed over anything that contradicted. When asked to provide concrete evidence, they had none. Worse than that, what they'd cited as sources of reference weren't saying what they claimed them to be saying. Total deception. Best of all, he questioned the ludicrousness of their statement and tore it to ribbons. Well done sir!
So my tax dollars are funding a website that can say whatever they like, regardless of whether what they say is true or not. As a former public servant I am appalled at the laxity of oversight in the expenditure of public money by these blinkered, so-called public servants. Seems public servants working for the Commonwealth can throw money at whatever they like without any due diligence.
The biggest factor is alcoholism. Not that other crap
Yes, you are absolutely right. My father was the nicest guy around until he drank whiskey, then he'd literally beat my mother to the point where she couldn't move. This was in the early 1970's. Using domestic violence as a means to address "gender inequality" to get better pay is just disrespectful to those women who are in this situation. Side note: My (4) brothers have never once been violent with a woman, though 2 of them have had their wives be violent with them. And I have never tolerated a violent man.
Shhhhhh we get a lot of tax from that
Watching this video from outside Australia I can only say, we need more people like him to fix the mess we have around the world.
This guy when he calls out indigenous and minority high rates he does more than these PC advocates ever do
PC LEADS TO SUFFERING!!!!
feminist mafia looks after its self
A definition of Citation - "a quotation from or reference to a book, paper, or author, especially in a scholarly work"....so as David points out....it's not a "a reference sighting a reference". So a lot of the assertions & statements in the absence of citations are opinions, are they not? A definition of Opinion - "a view or judgement formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge". Very interesting debate.
Specific references to sources and somebody to analyse them objectively is what's needed.
@@blahblah21747 I have heard one of the study they listed as reference and I know for a fact it was debunked.
I am sure that dude checked all of the provided ones and I am sure he will check all of the new ones because these ladies are spending money on fighting imaginary enemies and its always men.
Why arent they fighting for both genders?
What a disgrace.
You can’t debate against a woman. A debate would require reason and logic.
In other words $30,000.000.00 thats thirty million dollars has been spent on a program without result in the reduction of domestic violence and we still haven't worked out that it just may be the result of financial stress, an inability to articulate and understand feelings and emotions (on both sides), drug and alcohol abuse (on both sides) lack of a social behavioural framework and the list goes on which makes it all too hard so we will blame it on the wage gap and gender inequality. that should be ambiguous enough so that no-one questions it. well don, well done, pat yourselves on the back.
Bang on mate
women's group - "Can we have 30 million quid to stop Muslims and Abo's from smacking their wives please?"
government - "How are you going to do that?"
women's group - "We're going to teach white boys that they are bad and that it's wrong to hit women."
That's it in a nutshell.
Good work, Senator. Please keep up the good work.
What is being done to address the issues of womens violence against men?
Naughty Goat Farm not a GD thing
Nothing.
She said women almost every sentence.
What a biased bitch.
Black dragon story she's a sexist biggot!
Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu is available to mitigate violence without causing harm ;)
My mom was violent never my dad. I saw her throw things. She physically assaulted him many times. He never reciprocated. Once they split up her violence turned on me and my brother. I asked my dad once why he never reported her “no one would have believed me. And I would have been arrested even though I never touched her “.
And the HUGE amount of Gay domestic violence?
Especially the lesbian domestic violence?
And the one third of victims being men? Sighted by police
1:40 So what this woman is saying is that men who indicate positive views (or less negative views) towards beating up women... are more likely to beat up women. Wow, I'm so glad the Australian Govt spent millions of dollars to find that out.
I don't doubt for a second that in OTHER countries, or among some immigrant groups, women having little in the way of financial resources plays a role in DV (them being unable to leave due to not having the financial resources to leave, or fearing that their children will grow up in poverty without the financial support of an abusive man), but I think arguing that a woman earning 80k is more likely to get beat up because her male peers are earning more (due to working more overtime etc) is going to play that big a difference in DV outcomes compared to if she earned 80k but her male peers earned less.
So it would be more fair to say... which most reasonable people would agree with, that POVERTY is a major factor in DV... but they'd never say that because they want to push a narrative (about how important all this nonsense about the supposed "Pay Gap" is) and use this to justify the Australian Govt spending millions on their pet projects.
5:15 So you agree or disagree with their claim? Also since you link to their site and encourage people to "get educated" by reading it, 1. You do have some duty to make sure the claims by that site are factually accurate, and 2. If you believe that people who read that site will walk away more uninformed than they were to begin with, you have a responsibility NOT to link to it.
7:22 What are this woman's qualifications? Because if she has any kind of degree, someone should've explained to her that "Correlation does not establish causation". Besides, I don't think many people would argue that societies that view women with contempt are more likely to condone violence towards them, though I question the sincerity of feminists to tackle this issue until they go after the big one (Islam).
+1000
" If you believe that people who read that site will walk away more uninformed than they were to begin with, you have a responsibility NOT to link to it."
Exactly. They seem to think that by talking, they are answering the question.
They utterly failed to justify the waste of 30 million dollars to drive their own ideology which is (a) not supported by evidence and (b) is nowhere near the primary causes.
Great work.
Please talk to Karen Straughan of The Honey Badgers (CZcams/Reddit personality) - she is the most well informed person on DV in the world.
Also check out "REFERENCES EXAMINING ASSAULTS BY WOMEN ON THEIR SPOUSES OR MALE PARTNERS:
AN ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY" - it can be found on Google.
"This bibliography examines 286 scholarly investigations: 221 empirical studies and 65 reviews and/or analyses, which demonstrate that women are as physically aggressive, or more aggressive, than men in their relationships with their spouses or male partners. The aggregate sample size in the reviewed studies exceeds 371,600. "
55% of DV victims are male - how the hell can it be caused by gender inequality?!
Listening to these women are like listening to flat earthers.....
Flat earthers have stacks of evidence and observable and repeatable experiments, ie, science. These women have none
Flat earthers are more believable lol.
People who believe in the "patriarchy" as some kind of shadow overlord or "systematic racism" are quite literally conspiracy theorists. There are no evidence for their claims, the contrary! Yet they will refuse all evidence. Any evidence they see they claim is "manipulated by the white man".
I am about to watch for the first time.. Every one take a drink every time she says 'I will take that on notice.'
why is it all women working on these type of crap
For their own benefit and self interest, obviously.
Women make good factory workers: easily amused and occupied by the most montonous, mundane activities.
Government civil servants are typically incompetent, lazy, and unnecessary.
Otherwise they will have to learn how to be useful, life is too good now to beat them into submission of being good mothers, so they remain useless.
What a load of feminist garbage. Citing studies, web sites etc with no citations or references. Instant 'fail' if you did that in an exam or thesis at any University !!
I mean, imagine being a man with 2 functioning neurons in your brain, and listening to the unrecognisable crap coming from these people
*EVERYDAY*
I'd shoot myself.
He should be our pm!!!
Is she pretending to look intelligent by constantly playing with her spectacle
Krishna Oza Every act needs a prop.
Yes
Leyonhjelm for prime minister
"It is not our departments role to go through what’s on it’s website and see citation arrangements or referencing in that sense, with all due respect " What the Ef did I just hear her say??
One of my favorite comedians working today. He keeps setting them up and the Ministry of truth keeps knocking them down
Its crazy to think that assertive and truth seeking politicians is a rare breed when these should be the baseline characteristics of political representatives
David, you are a reasonable and sensible man trying to talk reason and sense into these souls of victim-hood who are trying to justify their positions. Keep up the great work and continue to question their conniving ways.
We need politicians like this in the U.K.
"We expect to see changes in 10 years - please keep paying me. I won't have a job otherwise."
30 million tax payer dolloros down the drain.
Great work Mr Leyonhjelm!
She talks about campaigns with indigenous celebrities through social media and online but anyone who has been/seen troubled indigenous areas know that 99% of them don't have phones or any internet facilities. 30 million dollars of tax payer money and no results is what it sounds like.
Keep it up mate ! Probably one of the few politicians around the world who truly care about their country! #lovefromcanada
Hang on!.... She's a woman so must be right!.... How dare anyone question that assertion!
The Krutchinator questioning women and treating them the same as men is misogynistic
I like that senator. He has the common sense many of the others don’t have
When you get right down to it, it's all about money. Paying the salaries of these and other people involved in "violence against women" prevention campaigns.
We need this man in the US, he would make a great senator here
Leyonhjelm should be PM, great work mate
What a stupid method of inquiry. How will we as the public get to the truth if our representatives are limited to a couple of minutes of questions which are then wasted with long winded and evasive answers. I never see any concern on the part of the departments or persons under review, because they know they only have to hold out for a short period and we will move on and continue the status quo. Go David! Do what you can in the little time they give you.
If you watch the video of David's previous questions to these women and compare that with the current one, it's like a teacher gave his students homework, to be handed in ASAP. The students all failed, and now their excuses aren't even as good as saying the dog ate my homework. Plus not a single citation is from a published study, it's all from other government, or agency,,websites. But it's only thirty million!!!
We need this guy here in Europe!
Poverty, drug and alcohol abuse, childhood abuse are far more at the heart of the issue than gender inequality.
The question of the day! "Did you achieve what you set out to do?" ...blah blah blah... Bs filter "no". If I waisted 30m on a program without quantified results, I'd be fired!
My ex had no problem getting drunk Beating on me. Kids pulling her off. Being a man police said abandoned your home, kids & leave, or suck it up. During "Me too" not a scratch on her, my face bloodied, they refused to arrest or remove her. Several times. Gender did seem to play a role.
God, he has the patience of a saint!
These people got issues. They spent their life fighting for something that is nonexistent.
@18:00 “Senator is there a question?”........”no I think this chairs giving me the wind-up!” 🤣👍
I am almost tempted to allow these ideologues to have their way if I was able to sit in safety and view the destruction their foolish meddling would cause.
What evidence? They do not have any evidence. They have assertions and opinions dressed up as research. You also have to watch them use research that is talking about third world counties (Bangladesh, Pakistan etc) and applying this to Australia.
Watch the video of this man taking them on specifically regarding the “pay gap”, it is brilliant. The women were embarrassing themselves.
to make it very simple, are Australian tax dollars being evenly distributed based on facts or feelings?
Their evasiveness is gross. Drain the swamp...
I would like to to see what questions are asked and how they are worded in the surveys, for the statistics they use
round & round & round they go.......never actually answering the bloody question!
Also $30 million is a boat load of money. These people should have to be held accountable and make transparent every single penny that was spent and the resulting ROI.
WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE for the assertions? Citations and references making assertions based on zero studies and zero statistics are meaningless!
This is the 'air soft' guy?
LOL. What a legend. Destroy them all.
@Didddin duuu nufffin Wakanda enn shiiieet too bad he isn't a senator anymore tho
All she did was reiterate the claim with a few anecdotes... But no actual evidence.
So refreshing to hear a sensible voice in government, taking the feminist witches to task.
Imagine if these universities they went to actually taught the difference between an assertion contained in a study, versus a study that provides empirical evidence to back such an assertion up.
Somehow i get the feeling that there's a lot of people making a lot of money from taxpayers within the "family violence INDUSTRY".
"It's not our job to review citations".
Brings to mind a quote in the movie "As Good as it Gets" with regards to the main character being asked how does he write woman so well... "I think of a man and I take away reason and responsibility."
God help us! We pay these fools to do this... It's a really poor reflection on the electorate that we've allowed such weak minded ideologues to have such power.
I know there are plenty of reasonable intelligent women who are thoughtful and bright. There's no sign of their existence here though.
OMG how can these people blatantly lie.
4:11 That was a really complicated way to say we we don't care how factual the data is, we fund them because they support our agenda.
Bingo
Is there anywhere we can get a script of this....
Well done David... keep asking the hard questions
Feminists got equality, in fact, in every country, they're riduculous at the same level, in the same way 😂😂😂... greetings from Italy!!! 😉
The crusade against postmodernism must be strong and vigilant!
Love this man.
Senator you are smart polite and sensible...you do a good job
Oh yeah we can ALWAYS trust the EU
We need this man in Scotland
For such a complex issue, they have certainly tried to simplify it way too much in broader terminology that doesn't truly reflect issues that require a bit more detail to give context (history of family abuse, low income, drugs and alcohol, outdated views on gender roles in relationships etc).
Love this guy for testing their theories and lack of evidence
They seem to be fighting to justify the expense. But what they should be doing is agree to examine the assertion they have made, and work towards better approaches to solving the problems of domestic violence, not desperately trying to defend their unscientific approach.
Platitudes 101 they r out of their league.
Hear them start yelping at the end, when Leyon-heart broke it down and told them they were full of sh*t?
They just expected it to all go through unquestioned, with people taking the chance to signal their virtue instead of examine at the issue.
Senator Leyonhjelm is a great man
I want to be as cool as this senator. 😃. This is the third time I watch him confront a panel of women. He is really calm. Like Morgan freeman’s voice calm.
Can't
Understand
Normal
Thinking
TABLE THE DOCUMENTS !
Wants equal treatment.
Refuses to provide equal (or even functional) results.
Fails to see the irony
Facts vs emotions, beautiful
Pigs in the money trough.
That's all we see from these committees
She keeps saying success as if information going out equals success.. I.E. equality of outreach.
Great job thanks Senator. You could use the Nordic paradox ( higher DV in Sweden and Norway etc.. ) and the high rate of DV in lesbian relationships to further challenge the tax funded scam.
He said instead of a last question he would put a comment forward, to sum up his position. Then she asks "Is there a question?"
Well he asked a lot of questions already, I think he deserved as a senator one opinion based on the evidence lol
30,000,000 dollars. Wowzers.
"we need money to buy expensive vanity bag, tour over the world, staying in luxurious hotel, giving the speech in top university gathering etc." -- so stop asking questioning and give us another 30mil.
Listen to the background starting 12:09 you can hear the women say "See he hasn't been specific about violence against women" then then next time they answer they use the phrase domestic violence for the first time.
30 million dollars for alot of social media posts, blogs and radio mentions.
This is the final year?? *Good!* what a waste of money
Brace yourself ladies, for many a clouted partner is a partner deserved of a clout.
You're not free to behave like infantile, emotionally incontinent zombies with absolute impunity, we're humans not granite.
I've seen and experienced evil and although I've walked away, I've regretted that, I fully understand those who just can't quite do so.