Nikon 70 200mm f2.8 lens - Why It's My Favorite Lens
Vložit
- čas přidán 10. 09. 2024
- Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II AF-S Nikkor Zoom Lens: amzn.to/2K5epXB
photofonz.com - Is Nikon's Nikkor 70 200mm f2.8 VR lens the best lens made by Nikon? It is for me when I'm doing portrait and wedding photography, and yes,it is also a favorite among pros for sports, fashion and wildlife photography.
Most pros will agree Nikon's 70-200mm f2.8 VR lens has the stunning performance that serious amateur and pro photographers seek out to capture razor sharp images. Here Photofonz talks about and shows several images and gives his 3 top reasons that make this his favorite lens.
If you are looking for the right tool to do the job, consider this lens if your speciality is wedding, portrait, fashion and even wildlife photos. Here is a great example why Photofonz would give a higher priority to lens selection than in camera body selection.
Disclaimer: All opinions expressed in this video are my own. The links shared in this video and description contain affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. This helps support the channel and allows us to continue to make videos like this. Thank you for the support!
Thanks, I have this Nikor 70-200mm for about 15 years or so. I have used for Action Sports, Landscapes,, Portraits. I agree 100% it is my favorite lens of the many lens i own. Very nice to the point review.
I've got this lens on my D7200, and I love it! But I must admit, I really love doing portraits with my old 50mm 1.8D! That's one cheap and sharp little number!
Good info here sir.... just bought this lens a few months ago and still learning how to use it. Many thanks..... JJ
Hello Photofonz... i agree with you on all points... i have the old 80-200/2.8 AF-D, it's a 1992 lens that i bought used in 1998.... it is very sharp and worked great on my old FM2 and F90X.... and it still works fine with excellent results on my D2H and D300... here in Italy it goes used for 400 - 600 euros... depending on condition...
I have it and it is my MOST used lens.. It is TACK sharp and the VR works great.. Almost all my scenery is photographed in the twilight and golden hours hand held but braced well against my window
Thank you for your perspective on the use of this focal length and the high quality of the Nikon lens. I considered the Nikon 70-200 f2.8 and opted for the new Tamron 70-200 f2.8 g2 lens. The cost savings was a key factor plus as an amateur, the build quality and lens performance was excellent and meeting my needs.
Thanks for this! I found this at a nice price used and it is coming to dady tomorrow, cant wait! Will be used on the N D7200.
Hey, how is it with d7200? I'm planning the same setup
I'm already broke with the d810 and 24-70 2.8
sir your photography is so nice sir i am not speak .English but i am love photography
one question why iso 400 it seem to be a clearly and a nice day?
Bob Ramsey Great question! In the early days of digital cameras, I was reluctant to shoot anything above ISO 100. As the technology advanced, higher ISOs were much more usable. Today, the newer cameras are so far advanced in higher ISO shooting. It seems like ISO 800 is what ISO 100 used to be.
I love my 70-200...now , 2020 I still use it with my old CCD sensor Nikon D200 for orchid pictures and portraits...
Back focus on my d5300 almost all the time (the 18-140 works nicely on that body). The 70-200 Worked great on a d800.
Thinking of getting a secondhand Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G IF-ED VR. Can l use it with a Nikon D750?
Yes, the Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G IF-ED VR lens can be used on either DX or FX camera bodies like the D750. www.ebay.com/itm/126198853313
Why don't you lower the shutter speed AND ISO?
+Mark Ferwerda That's the first thing I thought when I saw the settings. I don't think there's any reason not to be at 1/1000.
+Mark Ferwerda OK actually he already answered this question 5 times below :)
I have the Nikon af-s 80-200, I got great results with it today. i miss the vr of my 70-300 though.
I have one coming !!!!
What was your distance from the subject at 200mm?
Question, why would u use iso 400 and 4000/th of a second? why not just drop iso to 100?? makes no sense to me or did i miss something??
+Kung Cidro No, you did not miss anything and you make a good point. While it is usually beneficial to use the lowest ISO, however with the latest advances in photo technology, I don't mind shooting in ISO 400, 800 and beyond. Since I was shooting in aperture priority with a lens opening of f/2.8, 1/4000 of a second was calculated by the camera.
It is good practice to keep the ISO on the lower side when doing photography for a client, especially if a large wall portrait is to be ordered. Over the weekend I photographed a family portrait outdoors with ISO settings mostly in the 500 range and some up to ISO 800. I am confident my Nikon D7200 and Fuji X series cameras will still produce exceptional quality wall portraits.
One thing to consider: When the lighting is low, to avoid camera shake and or subject movement, it may be necessary to raise the ISO. Better to risk having a tiny bit of noise, than have to show your clients blurry images. A properly exposed image also is important.
I currently have a canon 600D & sigma 17-50. Do you think the nikon D600
oil issues have been fixed? I would like to buy one with the nikon 80-200.
I take landscape photos and some portraits. Would I see a image improvement
with full frame. Thanks
michael
According to some Nikon D600 users, the oil issues have been resolved, see: forum.nikonrumors.com/discussion/84/d600-dustoillubricant-issuediscussiondiscontinuation-and-price-reductions/p1
Because of current quality control on the D600, it may be a good time to pick one up if you see a good deal on one. I am a fan of the D600 and would consider one if I was looking for a new full frame.
One advantage of using full frame (FX) sensor cameras is that you'll be able to get a shallower deph of field, giving you more background blur. This is useful when doing portraits. I also like the fact that you should be able to get better images at higher ISOs. Plus, you won't have the crop factor in the full frame sensor camera. This is useful when trying to get a nice wide angle image, since you can use get the focal length of the lens you are using, what it was meant for.
However, most new crop sensor cameras have gotten so good. Unless, you plan on printing huge wall murals, and really need the higher iso benefit, you may not see a huge difference. Plus, with full frame cameras, you have the added expense, additional size and weight and may have lens availability problems.
Thank you so much for this awesome review. I will get this one for my Christmas present...I have one more question...I am using D90 Nikon body...Do you think this lense fit to my D90 body? Thank you for answer in advance Sir!!
Yes, Nikon's AF-S NIKKOR 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR lens will work on both FX (full frame) & DX (crop sensor) camera bodies. When used with a DX body, it will give you a 105-300mm equivalent focal length range.
I believe you'll find this lens a great combination with your D90, which is still a fantastic camera. I've used this lens on a Nikon D750, which is a full frame, as well as several DX bodies such as the Nikon D7200, D300 and even the Fuji S2 &S3 in the early days of electronic imaging, which if my memory serves me correct, is a Nikon N80 & D100 body respectively.
If you can do without the VR, the 80-200mm 2.8 AF-S is pretty great too.
Yes, I would have to agree that Nikon's 80-200mm f2.8 is also a superb lens. With today's ability in getting beautiful images at higher ISO's, it's getting easier to shoot sharper images without VR or image stabilization if you're careful in avoiding camera movement. A tripod or monopod would help out here and you can save yourself quite a bit of cash.
But, if the 70-200mm f2.8 is within your budget and not a hardship, then consider this lens.
Do you have a reason for using 400 ISO at 1/4000? Why not ISO 100 at like 1/1000? Thanks for the video. I opted for the Tamron 70-200/2.8 with VC, not the old version without it. I would love to have the Nikon but this new Tamron does come close at half the cost. Tack sharp and fast focus.
Great Question! Before starting the shoot I set the ISO to 400. I normally shoot at aperture priority these days and wanted to be sure to get a fast enough shutter speed, as I was shooting hand held. With the amazing technological advances today in high quality images using high ISOs, I am quite confident in shooting anywhere from 100 to 800 ISO.
In my early days of my photography career, there was a huge difference in 100 and 400 ISO/ASA films. The early 400 speed films had a major grain factor and were not normally used in portraiture or where a quality images was needed.
Later, some photographers used grain as a means of creative expression. When the 400 speed films grain was reduced, photographers started using 3200 ISO films.
There was a similar situation in the early days of digital cameras. Using ISO 400 yielded poor results. The images were highly pixilated and would break up. It didn't take long for Nikon, Canon, Fuji and other camera manufactures, to produce cameras that were capable of producing amazing images at super high ISOs. And that's where we are today!
Yes, Tamron does manufacture some outstanding lenses, including the new 70-200mm f2.8. I own the 28-75mm f2.8 and, along with other professional photographers, am very impressed with the results.
Thanks for the reply!!!!!
Do you shot the 70-200mm on the Nikon d7000? Really for Weddings?
can this lens f2.8 lens take night photos on Night Mode without a flash? in a big scene shot, like a lake or harbour
+Nancy Pirrello Yes, Nikon's 70-200mm f/2.8 can work well with taking night photos on Night mode with any subject where a mid to telephoto focal length lens is needed. At f/2.8, it is also capable of nice low light images or when background blur is needed, plus it is also a very sharp lens. This is an exceptional lens for portraits, sports, candids, etc. This lens is a much sought-after "eye of the camera" among many professional photographers.
I read somewhere that you would upgrade to the VR2 version for weddings/etc/... I am a starting photographer and i am blessed to shoot with the D500 + 18-35mm f1.8 sigma + 24-70 f2.8 nikor lens (without VR). Now that it's 2018 and the VR 1 70-200 is getting older.. What would you do? Get the 70-200 VR 1 or get the VR 2 (a lot more money)? I see there isn't very much of a difference but the price, yeah.. I like to shoot portraits - weddings- wildlife and some abstract shots. Thanks for the great video. A very fair and honest review.
Thank you. If it were me and I were starting my business today, I would consider the newer Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8 VR2. You have an amazing start with the D500 along with the other outstanding lenses. The 70-200mm is a serious lens that you, most likely, will be using for a long time.
Besides, if photography is your business, check with your accountant about taking the tax write-off.
One more thing, for weddings, I'd also add a wide angle or fish eye to your lens collection. Something at least in the 14/15mm range. This will give you an outstanding focal length range to provide beautiful albums for your bride & grooms. When your clients see your sample albums and the type of images taken with your 70-200mm f/2.8 down to your wide angle images, you should be able to book more profitable weddings.
Thanks for the amazing response. But I have bought the VR '1' version for just 700 euros with a full uv filter set with it. This is utterly cheap and it works just amazing. The VR is not the best, like my tamron 70-300 vc usd speedline but it works. The VR2 costs a lot more money and I still need some other stuff so it was worth it.. I guess! I'm an 'advanced amateur', no professional. But it is my passion, just like yours probably! I will look in the future for a shorter focal range! Thanks in advance, keep up the good work!
Hi! Will this lens work on my Nikon D3300?
Yes, it works well on the Nikon D3300.
Hi sir! I currently have this lens, the vr II version. But I am also planning of buying a nikon 85mm f1.8 for portraits. Which one do you think is better?
+gladys I really like both of these lenses. Both are excellent for portrait, wedding and sports photography. I like the fact that the 85mm is fast at f1.8, giving beautiful isolation of the subject with background blur. Then, I also like that the 70-200mm f2.8 is also a very fast lens that offers a focal length from 70 to 200mm, also capable of beautiful background blur.
For me personally, If I had to choose from only one of these fine lenses, I'd choose the 20-200mm f2.8 lens. However, if you have the budget, I'd consider also the 85mm f1.8 or preferably the f1.4 lens. Nikon of course!
photofonz 70/200 i think you mean sir!
hi
thank you for the great videos.. i've just got the D810 and 70-200 2.8. switching from Canon!
question on macro and portrait , do you recommen the old 200 f4 and 135 f2?
thank you
+Fahad Al Othman (eFahad) I think you'll realy love the Nikon D810 and 70-200mm f/2.8 combination. Great lens for portraits, candids, sports, etc. As for the older Nikon 200mm f4 lens, I don't own it but understand other photographers really like the sharpness of this lens and also gets fantastic reviews.
As for the 135mm f/2, this is also a great lens for portraits. Years ago, I used an old 135mm f2.8 lens for mostly portraits and really liked it. Mine was very sharp and this is a great focal length for head shots.
Hello! Thanks for the review on the nikon 70-200 2.8 vr lense. I've been looking at the Tamron also but I think I may make the sacrifice and get a used nikon because as you said, they are pricey.
You should get the Tamron. It only depends on getting a good copy of the lens, because I tested the Nikon VR2 and the Tamron and there was almost no difference. Many say the Nikons focusing is a little faster, but I couldn't tell the difference. It only makes sense to get the Nikon if you need the special Nikon Warranty reserved for pro shooters, otherwise go for the Tamron because it'll save you 1000$.
I now own a Tamron and it's just fantastic. I use it on a D750 and can't tell a difference in sharpness when I compare it to my Nikon 50mm 1.8G. But I can say that it's MUCH sharper, then my Nikon 70-300 VR and Nikon 18-200 VR2.
Hope it helped.
Although it's not a 70-200mm f2.8 lens, I have been using my Tamron 28-75mm f2.8 lens while testing the Nikon D7200 and want to mention that this is a very sharp & fast lens that is also good for portraits and weddings.
They have been selling on ebay for about $250.
Hi, can you be really specific of this brand please, I am not sure! and I want to be really sure to by the right one. It appears to be on the market as Nikon's Nikkor 70 200mm f2.8 VR- II (what is the II for ) is there a difference? I need to know the difference pls. Also is Amazon a good place to buy for price? What is its price range pls. Thanks Nance
+Nancy Pirrello The lens I own is Nikon's Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR. Nikon's newer version is the 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II. While both are excellent, the newer version is better, according to photographers who have used both lenses.
Yes, both Amazon & B&H Photo are reliable places to buy. Both have the VRll priced at $2,096.95.
+Nancy Pirelli the II stands for second model Nikon made of this lens, the first lens made by Nikkor was 70-200 f2.8 VR
how do you setup your d7000 with this lens for shooting active sports indoors. Also
did you select both f stop and time or just choose f stop and let camera choose time
I'm really not a sports shooter. I use the 70-200mm f2.8 more for portrait and wedding photography. However, If I wanted to shoot sports, this lens would be ideal. You would have to determine the best setting for what you are about to accomplish. If you wanted to stop action, then you would set your lens speed fast enough to stop the action of what it is you are photographing. You can also use a slow enough shutter speed to get motion blur by panning with the moving subject. And of course if one wanted to control background blur, one would use a large aperture for maximum background blur.
Do some testing and try shooting in manual mode for more control.
do you think it is worth upgrading to the vr2?
Personally, I don't see the need to upgrade. I am still extremely happy with the older Nikon 70-200mm f2.8 VR lens. But if money is no object, and you can use a tax write-off, (check with your accountant), then it may be a consideration to upgrade to the 70-200mm VR2.
Hi, I hope you can help me somehow
I want to get a 70-200mm f/2.8 for my D7200 but I don't know if I should get the Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD or the Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8 G ED VR I?
Greetings from Italy!
Hi Fabian:
It is hard for me to recommend a lens for someone else but I'll give it a go. The lens I use with my D7200 is Nikon's 70-200mm f/2.8 older VR I lens. It is an awesome match with my D7200. It gives nice bokeh, is extremely sharp, has nice contrast, is well made. There isn't anything I don't like about this lens. I don't even mind the weight & size when you consider the quality this lens offers.
With that said, even though I don't own the Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 lens, I hear a lot of good things about it. It would also depend on whether you want to spend $2996 for the Nikon (new) or about $1299 for the Tamron. I don't think you'll be disappointed with either one, so you'll have to consider how much you want to budget for this type of lens.
I have owned a couple different Tamron lenses. I still use a Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 lens that I purchased many years ago. I use it quite often and have been very happy with it. Best of Luck.
Greetings from the USA!
Hi, I am thinking to buy Nikon or Canon 18-200mm lens.
Please could you let me know the major difference between 18-200 (f3.5 - 5.6) and 70-200 (f2.8)!
Could we use 70-200mm for day out trips/holidays? As you mentioned in your video that 70-200 is good for portraits but can not we use 18-200mm one too for portraits!
Which one would you suggest me for my day to day photography such as kids at home, during holidays, kids school functions, kids sports, friends get-together etc (mix of indoor and outdoor photography!) 18-200 (f3.5 - 5.6) OR 70-200 (f2.8)
The difference between Nikon's 18-200 (f3.5 - 5.6) and 70-200 (f2.8) is huge. I own both of these lenses and use them both for different situations. First, I like the 18-200mm for it's wide range, light weight and is small, making it a great general purpose lens for travel. Notice this lens is not as fast as the f2.8 lens. At full zoom will give you only f5.6 at it's largest opening. Nikon's 70-200mm is a constant f2.8 lens opening making it fast and ideal for portraits, sports, etc. Plus, this lens is extremely sharp and the quality is reflected in the price.
While you can use the 18-200mm lens for portraits, it will not give you the defocus capability of the 70-200mm f2.8 lens. Shooting full zoom and at it's widest lens opening of f5.6 will help. It is reasonably sharp but comparing the 2 lenses, the 18-200 mm would be a compromise for the type of portraits I do. The 18-200mm would give you a wider range in landscape, cityscape and archetecture photography however.
As for Canon, I am a Nikon shooter so can give you my opinion on Nikon only. Many pros do use Canon and many pros use Nikon. Several pros I know really seem to like Nikon's glass. Both are great systems and can give you outstanding images. It's up to the photographer to make it happen.
photofonz Can you use the 2.8 lens on a DX format such as the D7200?
ianrkav Absolutely! Plus the D7000, D7100 & D7200 has a focus motor and AF lenses should work back to around 1986. I'm running my D7200 through some tests and am using the Nikon 70-200mm f2.8 and the Tamron 28-75mm f2.8 lens works well also.
photofonz What about loss of area coverage. If you use the 70~200 2.8, which is for an FX sensor and can also be used on a 35mm film camera, won't you lose some image area that a DX sensor won't cover. Also, if you use a DX format lens on an FX camera won't there be vignetting etc? I'm still used to 35mm you know. Having owned Nikon and Olympus cameras in the past:-)
ianrkav When using the Nikkor 70-200mm f2.8 lens on a DX camera body with a 1.5x factor, the focal length converts approximately to 105- 300mm. It will give the appearence of a greater telephoto effect due to the reduced sensor size. When using a wider angle lens, you will loose some of the wide or fish eye effect due to the crop factor. Here is where an FX (Full Frame) sensor is a greater benefit in achieving a wide angle look.
You may experience some vignetting when using a DX lens on a FX (Full-Frame) body, especially in the wide or fish eye focal range.
Sir can you tell me How about Nikon D5500 with Nikon 70 200mm f2.8 lens for wildlife Photography ,
answer please Sir .....
+mujtahid rifat Yes, Nikon's D5500 would be a great match for the 70-200mm f2.8 lens. With the D5500 being a DX crop sensor camera, the focal length would be 105mm-300mm. This lens has the ability for producing nice background blur when you want to isolate the subject.
If and when you want to upgrade to an even better body, the Nikon 70-200mm f2.8 lens will always be a great lens choice for wildlife, portraits and sports photography, whether shooting DX or FX-format.
+photofonz Sir , How about nikon d5500 with 18-140mm lens .
+mujtahid rifat
The Nikon 18-140mm is a good general purpose lens. I do not own this lens; instead
I have the 18-200mm which is similar since both have an f3.5 lens aperture on
the wide side (18mm) and f5.6 on the tele side for the 140mm and the 200mm.
Although a good lens, it will not isolate the subject from the background as much as a faster lens would like the 70-200mm f2.8 or some of the f1.4/1.8 prime lenses.
do you still use this lens or are you using the newer version
Yes, as of now, still using the older version. Don't have a need to upgrade, as the old one is still outstandingly sharp and works great.
photofonz ok sir....i just go one in mint condition just for my collection.
Is this lens worth it in December 2020 for $450? Mint copy
If it's a mint Nikkor f/2.8, it's well worth it. Sounds almost too good to be true.
@@photofonz yes it's 9/10 condition. Seller just sent me a few more pics of the lens. It seems to be in excellent shape and he's a highly rated seller.
If that's really the case, it sounds like a really great deal. Check the sellers' return policy.
Do you usually shoot in the aperture priority mode?
+Ray Sanders Yes, Mostly I shoot Aperture Priority or Manual mode.
+photofonz Thanks, some day I hope to master the manual mode.
+Ray Sanders Ray: Shooting in manual mode is not all that difficult as you will find the more you do it. You will gain more control in creating your image and besides, as you look through the viewfinder, you can still use your meter as a guide.
Sir, My Name is Lekshmi from India; I am so addictive to your CZcams Channel, love the way you explain with much simplicity which is easy to understand for even common people. Ok Sir let me come to the point, I am planning to Gift my physically disabled friend an Nikon D810 (body), I am not a big budget Girl but my friend is so made ok Nikon D810. What I need your help Sir, is what lens should I gift him with the Camera. My friend has little difficulty in moving around so thought to give lens which suits him. He always says about bokeh effects (I personally don’t know which lens is good for that) and My friend takes good photograph with his point and shot small camera, so my purpose of gifting is that he can take some good photos or a small studio which can give him some income, Is these lens good Sir, 1) Nikon 50mm f/1.4G, 2) AF-S NIKKOR 24-120mm f/4G ED VR 3) AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G IF-ED 4) AF-S NIKKOR 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5G ED VR. Also I want a good external Flash; Battery Grip and a Tripod, I hope you Sir would help me with a very Good advice.
Thank you. Sounds like you've already chosen an excellent camera body in the Nikon D810. As for lenses, it is difficult for me to choose for someone else, since it depends on what type of photography your friend would be using the lenses for and of course your budget, but I'll give you my opinion and which lenses I like.
You mention the 50mm f/1.4G. This is an outstanding fast prime lens that is capable of giving nice bokeh/background blur. It is small, lightweight and sells at a very good price. Great for portraits, candids and street photography. The AF-S NIKKOR 24-120mm f/4G ED VR lens or the 24-70mm would be a good choice.
As for the Nikkor 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G IF-ED, if it were me, I'd choose the Nikkor 70-200mm f 2.8 lens. This is my favorite lens for portraits and also great for sports photography. Another option would be the 70-200mm f4 lens as it is smaller, lighter and less expensive. And still another great prime lens is the 85mm f1.4.
As for the NIKKOR 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5G ED VR, I'd pass on this lens in favor of the 24-120mm lens.
As for on-camera flash I use the Nikon SB-800 AF Speedlight. It is several years old now but still being used and loved by many pros. A new version would be Nikon's SB-910 AF Speedlight. As for off camera flash for on-location photography I use the Quantum Qflash. Although I don't use a battery pack, but I would consider the Nikon MB-D12 Multi Power Battery Pack.
As for tripods, I use the UNI-LOC Tripod. It is the last tripod I will ever need. Very sturdy but a bit heavy. Gitzo makes some nice Carbon Fiber tripods that a very light weight. Best.
+photofonz Thanks a lot sir. you're reply has given me an good idea. such a professional answer by you sir. my prayers for you sir. thanks a ton.
Sick in Florida, I received my new 70-200 2.8 Nikon lens. I took it out to the lake area to shoot wildlife. All the photo were really out of focus. Have any ideas what happened. I had taken some photos around the house and they looked great. At 200 mm at the lake all were out of focus. Help.
+Ray Sanders +Ray Sanders If your camera settings are correct, you should not have this kind of focus problem. Double check your settings, such as auto focus is on if you are shooting in auto focus mode. Also be sure you are shooting within the minimum distance that the lens will be in focus. If your other lenses are working fine, it may be a problem with this particular lens.
+photofonz Maybe I am expecting too much from this lens. At what distance should you lose the focus? I was shooting a Hawks nest in a tree about 30 yards away and all of those are not in focus.
+Ray Sanders What I mean is how far away should you lose focus. I see videos on CZcams people take photos of things in the distance and they are in focus. I just feel something is wrong with lens, I have written to Nikon to see what they think.
+Ray Sanders The minimum focus distance of the new Nikon 70-200mm f2.8 lens is 4.6 ft. ( 1.4 m). So it is safe to say that whatever you photograph from 4.6 ft. ( 1.4 m) to infinity, has the potential for being in focus. As long as you are within that range and using the correct settings, this lens can produce extremely sharp images. One other thing you must consider is that the lens speed you are using is fast enough for the focal length of your lens. Perhaps what you are seeing is blur caused by camera movement. In other words, your shutter speed is set too low. Try using a tripod.
In photography, there is something called a "Reciprocal Rule". In a nutshell a good rule to follow, if you are hand holding your camera, is that the shutter speed of your camera should be at least the reciprocal of the effective focal length of the lens. So, if you are zoomed to 200mm, a good rule of thumb is to set your shutter speed to 1/200 sec. on a full frame camera (FX). On a Nikon D7100, which has a crop factor of 1.5, your shutter speed should be at least 1/300 sec. Even if you are shooting with a wider lens, use approximately 1/60 sec. as a minimum when hand holding. However, VR lenses can give you up to 4 stops of compensation.
More than likely, your settings are causing your blur. Try using the above recommendation. If that fails, your lens may be defective.
+photofonz I was using and use most of the time aperture priority and have had no problems in the past especially using my 70-300 Nikon. I will reset the setting on my camera and set the ones I want to use. I also have a Sigma 50-500 and have no problem hand holding it. It weighs a ton. This is all about my new 70-200 VR II 2.8
Will this lens work on my Nikon D7200?
Yes, the 70-200mm f2.8 lens will work on your D7200 as well as other older Nikon bodies. I even used it on my Fuji S2 for portraits years ago. There is also the benefit when using this lens on a crop sensor/DX body of gaining the additional 1.5x crop factor. This makes the lens a 105-300mm f2.8 focal length.
This could be a plus in gaining the additional focal length with this lens, but not so much when going into a wide focal length range. A 12mm fish eye now becomes equivalent to an 18mm lens, so some of the wide effect is lost.
Definitely! I use the combo and love it!!
Was this Manual Mode?
+Vicki Heinzman These photos were taken in Manual mode. Howevern many times I will shoot in Aperture Priority.
Yup might have to sell one if my kids lol
The edges should have been sharper, but for some reason they are not, i don't know may be it's not processed well, i mean complete raw.....
the photos look soft