Tamron 70-200 f2.8 G2 Real World Review vs Nikon 70-200 f2.8E: Is the Tamron Better for $1500 Less?
Vložit
- čas přidán 11. 09. 2024
- Tamron 70-200 f2.8 G2 Real World Review vs Nikon 70-200 f2.8E: Is the Tamron Better for $1500 Less? Download the RAW files right here froknowsphoto.c...
The Tamron 70-200 f2.8G is priced at $1,299 which is $1,500 less than the NEW Nikon 70-200 f2.8E lens. What everyone wants to know, is the Tamron a better buy or is the Nikon miles better? That's what I try to find out in this Real World Review!
I used the Nikon D500 and Nikon D5 DSLR Cameras for this shoot. We filmed the footage in the field with the Canon XC-10 and at the loft Nikon D750.
Download MyGearVault FREE for Apple iOS right here itunes.apple.c...
Music licensed from Beatsuite.com Music Library
www.beatsuite.com
Follow me on
CZcams bit.ly/frotube
/ froknowsphoto
/ jaredpolin
/ froknowsphoto
Get The FroKnowsPhoto Guide To Building Your Online Presence FREE right here as a download froknowsphoto.c...
Help support the show by using this link on Amazon amzn.to/27NH7Dk
USE CODE FRO at squarespace.com... to get your 14 day FREE Trial.
Get your FREE GUIDE to capturing motion in Low Light Right Here froknowsphoto.com/ just look for the orange box.
Boy am I ever late putting a comment on this video! I have watched Jarod’s comparison a few times over the last year while trying to decide between the Tamron & Nikon 70-200. I use a Nikon D500 and already am very familiar with Tamron having owned their G1 24-70 f/2.8 plus the Tamron 150-600 f/5-6.3 USD VC Di G2 so I am very aware of their build quality and quality glass. I was just going to buy the Tamron 70-200 f/2.8 G2 when an extremely mint condition Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 E Fl Ed Vr used lens was brought to my attention. The owner was switching to a Sony Mirrorless camera so was selling his Nikon f mount lenses off. This is such a gift for those of us still shooting DSLR’s right now as we get great lenses at wonderful prices every time somebody goes mirrorless. The price was only a couple of hundred more than the Tamron. The Nikon came with everything from the factory and appeared as though it came off a retailer’s shelf. I tested the Nikon and it tested like new with no front or back focusing etc and was truly amazing on the D500. Too good to pass up. The Tamron would have obviously worked for me but I felt that down the road the resale on the Nikon would be better plus I agree with Jarod that Nikon build quality is a known quality.
I have had this Nikon 70-200 for a few months now and it is fast, quiet, extremely sharp from 70-200 even in the corners. The build quality is #1. The VR is likely no better than the Tamron as Tamron really has quality vibration reduction. If the Nikon hadn’t appeared I likely would be a very happy Tamron 70-200 owner right now as I am extremely pleased with my other Tamron lenses. One more thing is that I use a Nikon 1.7 teleconverter with the 70-200 which gives me a f/4.8 with 510mm of reach for wildlife. Still focuses quickly, tracks great and is still very sharp on my D500. This comes in handy in lower light when the 150-600 struggles at f/6.3. I am quite pleased overall with my lens choices with Nikon and Tamron.
As a serious hobby photographer, I think the Tamron is the clear winner for me. I know I will keep dreaming about premium Nikon glass, but I am not making money off of my photos. Thanks for the great review.
it's perfect for the hobbyist.
right on. there's always two types: those making money and those not.
I’m also a hobbyist. My wife asked why do you need a $1200 lens. I asked her, why do you need $1200 purses?.. She told me use my card, as she walks away lol
HAHAHA...did you end up in the dog house at nite? Ya i say the same thing but the only problem i have had with Tamron vs Nikon lens when i try to ever sell them its harder to sell and usually drop in value a lot more...but yes great review thank you Jared.
About That Image what about used? Seen a few under $500
$1500 difference does not justify buying the nikon. I like this review....thanks for putting it for us.
I have the Tamron G2 on a D750 with grip. Brilliant combination and highly recommended.
I agree.
Mee2. We bought the D500 for my wife and I gave her my original Sigma 150-500 and with those two tools she is getting great bird/action shots. I went with the D750 for the resolution and the fact that the D300 hadn't been replaced yet. We D300 users had been waiting for ages for a good replacement APSC model.
How this lens preform on a crop sensor camera? I have a 70D, thinking about get this lens. Would you recommend it?
Jared Polin I have a Nikon d700 with the mb-d10 grip, the 1990s era 70-210 f5.6 zoom, and a 28mm ai from the 1980s. Should I get a used 70-210 f2.8 Nikon vr1, save up for the non af-s 80-200 f2.8, save up even more for the 300mm f4 pf Nikkor prime, or save up for this lens?
Jared Polin or should I save up for a 24-70 nikon
I always watching Jared's videos before I buy a Camera or a lens.This video made me buy the Tamron 70 200 G2.I just ordered online.
How do you like your lens?
Tamron $1300 > Nikon $2800
I mean...I can get 2 of the Tamrons CHEAPER than ONE Nikon...no contest! Thanks for the review.
Excellent review. One thing I have to add is that the Tamron comes with a 6 year warranty, so if it does not last, at least you have that.
Very well stated...thank you.
I would still rather buy a really clean used Nikon VRII lens for even less than the Tamron, but I personally just don't buy third party anything.
Is it worth it? I've been pondering this lens
I am pretty sure that only covers a few selective parts, which probably are the parts that don't often fail. Like Nikon offers 1 year Full and 4 years partial, but I'm not sure. Honestly the best way to go is to buy name brand or first party I like to call it. Buying Nikon for Nikon or Sony for Sony, etc. Also it is much more important to insure your camera gear as it is more likely that you will break or lose your gear than it will fail during the warranty period. Personals or portables insurance covers theft, accidental breakage and more. It is not very expensive and is offered from most major home or auto insurance companies.
@@patricksmith2553 Tamron's 6 year warranty is full coverage, not partial... atleast here in the US. you can look it up online.
As a semi-serious hobbyist, this lens is exactly what I want: indistinguishable from professional quality images at less than half the cost. If I didn't already have the older Nikon 70-200 VR II, I would have this lens on my list. I do already have the Tamron 24-70 and love it.
exactly.
I like how the GoPro is embedded completely inside the Fro
the best.
alphanimal GoFro
I thought it was known as a Go-Fro!!!
For the build quality question: Just remember that you could buy 2 of the Tamron's for the price of the Nikon, so the nikon has to be able to last twice as long to make financial sense. I'm a nikon shooter and currently use a Nikkor 80-200 2.8 af-s which is on it's last legs for the af-s motor. I had planned to get it service but apparently nikon doesn't make the parts for it anymore, so this tamron is on the short list. I can't really justify paying twice as much for an at best marginally better lens. With that extra money, I could buy a 200-500mm nikon also!
Pulled the trigger on the tamron 70-200, should be here tomorrow and hopefully it lives up to expectations.
John Lemieux so how are you liking it?
John Lemieux Yeah would like to know aswell. And for what kind of photography are you using it?
@@JohnLemieux What do you like about the lens now.
Definitely putting the Tamron on my buy-list. Looks like a great pairing for my D750. Thanks for the Real world review!
always a bit of a relief to see something you just bought get reviewed well.
With my back and shoulder issues, the D3s & D4s got to be too much for me to carry at all day events, baseball, football, hockey, airshows, etc. So I started shooting with my old trusty D700 again for this work. Really wish Nikon would release a true replacement for the D700 aka D5 without integrated grip. My product, macro and portrait work I do with my D810.
I owned the Nikon 70-200mm VR-I and used the VR-II. I left my VR-I on top of my truck and drove off... heard it roll off and crash. I was so pissed! Ordered a 70-200 VR-II to replace my VR-I, but had a job the same day so my photoshop owner lent me a Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 OS to use for a few days while the Nikon was on order.
To make a long story short, I was so impressed with the Sigma, I bought one instead of the Nikon VR-II and put the savings into a new set of mono-lights.
Sigma and Tamron's 70-200mm f/2.8 zooms are really there with Nikon's now, and in my opinion the Sigma macro and Art Lenses are better in most regards. And just a few years ago, I would have never believed anyone saying anything so absurd, and I always had nothing but Nikon glass.
Aight I know this is 5 years ago but that "walk up to the net and look like you belong" definitely helped when I went to a concert a few days ago and did the "look like you belong" thingy. It got me up the stage and got a good spot to shoot. The crew and other VIPs didnt even give a fck while I was up there shooting. 🤣
And btw, definitely getting that G2 early next year. It performs way above its price.
Yes, Yes, Yes, the Nikon 70-200mm 2.8E might be slightly better in the one or other area. But this delta is in my opinion not worth 1500 USD more. Not at all. Better to buy the Tamron and buy for the 1500 USD another good lens or even a 2nd camera. Or spend it in Spa :) Btw: I took the new Tamron on my recent trip to northwest part of China where it's currently still cold and very, very dusty. No issues at all with this lens. Also back in Shanghai no problem with this lens when using it on some rainy days outside. Seems to be the build quality is superb, Tamron did in my opinion here an excellent job, this new SP line gives you really a big bang for the buck.
Nice shots as always, Jared, but editing on the video is GREAT. GG Todd, I assume, and whoever else does it! I don't really care about the results from the tests, no one is putting out bad lenses any more, I'd buy the Tamron without any reviews.
Thanks, Stephen edits all the real world reviews.
Excellent review. I'm a serious photographer, but not full time, so the Tamron was the choice, and along with my D750, it is a beauty to have, what a fabulous lens. Personally, the 6 year warranty, the build, and the quality of photos is worth the purchase, so happy I purchased. This review just re-confirms my desicion.
Long video, but totally worth to watch till the end.I have the G2 on a D750, sharpness is fantastic. Took it to Andorra mountains for a test. From the top of the mountain I could shoot a group of 4 snow scooters in the valley, and still see their outfits and colors when pixel peeping. I agree the focus ring is not 100% smooth, but Nikon is 3179€ in Belgium vs 1600€ for the Tamron G2, so the choice was obvious.
I bought the Tamron 70-200 USD DI SP a couple of years ago and am really happy with the lens. About 12 months ago I dropped it after which it appears that the mount was slightly out of shape because it was hard to mount. It also made a rattling noise when shaken but the images have not been affected. Over time it has returned to normal as far as mounting goes but there is still a bit of a rattle when shaken. The images remain unchanged. Love the lens.
I've been sold on Tamron, since I bought my first Tamron lens 5 years ago. Great performer & easy on the wallet. I really think they hold their own against Nikon & Canon. Great review, Jared! 👍
Wow you did a damn good job taking two extremely similar photos with the two lenses.
Great review Jared, one of the best you've done I think. You covered all the information I wanted to know about the Tamron, and it was nice to see it actually being used outside of a studio. Really enjoyed the comparison shots too (amazing work getting them so similar).
After two copies of the Tamron, first had very noisy ratcheting VC and second copy had major front focus issue that even plus 20 could not rectify as well as AF acquisition. Even sent it in to Tamron...they said nothing wrong with lens. I ponied up to the Nikon and have absolutely NO regrets. No AF fine tune what so ever , freakingly fast and accurate focusing and superb and accurate color rendition. This lens will last my lifetime. By the way, great review Jared
Btw Jared, try shooting the Tamron with the tripod color down, resting on your hand. That solved the issue of focus ring drifting for me.
Wow! great production value on this video. extremely professional, high quality!
I have had the Tamron 70-200 2.8 G1 for the past 5 years - went through all tough situations of a wedding and portrait photographer with it. Even the G1 version is tack sharp, has great VC and quick AF. Still holding strong and looking good with no issue at all, have been using it on D600 and D850. I just upgraded to a new G2 at an insane 950€ (due to a local retailer discount ). Can not congratulate Tamron enough for this lense.
Dear Jared Polin, this is my very first comment in your channel. I am a BIG fan of you and all your videos because your video presentation is unique and one can learn a lot about various range of lens and cameras watching your videos. Thank you for giving such reviews which I found to be unbiased and honest. It's very interesting to watch your videos.. When this video came to end I realised that it was a 30 minutes clip and For me it was like 5 minutes.. don't know how it went so fast.. that's the strength of your video and your presentation skills.. love watching your videos and keep educating us with fun in your own style.. once again Thanks and love u for your work and videos..👍🏻
Jared rocks. How can anyone be this entertaining talking about camera equipment? It's a gift.
Pretty sure someone already said this but the "zoom" difference at 200mm is the focus breathing. The nikon VR2 had the same problem. You (Jared) noticed it as well on the video when you compared the D5 vs the 1DX, and shoot a singer's face with both. Tony Northrup noticed that the Sigma, Tamron and Nikon VR2 had this problem unlike the Canon. This new Nikon 70-200 solved the problem, at a higher price though.
Nice review as usual. Thanks!
People don't buy a 70-200 for long range sports like baseball. You could probably use some cheap kit 70-300 and get good results at those distances because at those distances you're not getting portrait quality. However, do a comparison of headshots or portraits - which is what the lens is mostly used for - and you'll see why the Nikon is more.
amazing jobs with taking pictures that are damn near the same with the 2 lens. If your a pro and your main lens is the 70-200, then go with the Nikon. If you are anyone else, looks like the Tamron might be the way to go.
Yes, difficult weather conditions, better weather/dust sealing, etc.
I just got the G2 myself, and Jesus it's heavy. Can you share your workout routine and diet? I think I need to work out a bit if I want to keep using this lens.
The original Tamron 70-200 VC is heavier but its never bothered me that much personally in the majority of situations.
Shoot with the Sigma 200-500 f/2.8 for a month, and the G2 will be as light as a pocket camera lens. (I know I am not helping)
Try the 150-600 G2. Anyway, everyone, you do get used to them. I carry my Nikon D750 camera (full frame) with the battery grip, with the 600 G2 mounted on my tripod (Induro fiber), around on my shoulder and in my right hand, all day long.
Michael, I see that you take pride in your abilities with your right hand. :)
Yes, and the other one and the rest of my body is trained as well.
This is hugely helpful. Thank you for making a real world review that is so in depth and well planned. I was leaning towards a new G2 over a used Nikon, and now I'm pretty much sold. Thanks again!
Just bought the slightly older version without the VC since my camera has internal stabilization. For around $600 US you can NOT go wrong with this lens. Just starting to use it and already really digging it.
Would love to see a comparison to the new sigma 70-200mm f2.8 dg os hsm sport VS These two lens.
I don't know how I got here, but now I want to buy this Tamron lens. That looks like a lot of value for a thousand bucks. Jared, you're putting impressive amount of work into your reviews. Great job!
as a pro photographer using Nikon glas for years I must admit that Tamron has made me think... it started with the 24-70/28 G2 which gave me better results (also personal taste in colours and contrast) than the newest Nikon 24-70/2.8E. It might be personal but I think Tamron is on a very good way and their price politics are amazing. Thanks for the field test video which actually counts much more than any lab test!
for information : Tamron has reduced the mod (minimal object distance) from 1.3m (50.7 in) in our older 104A025N to 0.95m (37.4 in), allowing a maximum magnification ratio of 1: 6.1
The Tamron focus breathes at close range making it less than 200. Common problem with a 70-200 and many zooms in general. Film with the Tamron at 200mm moving the focus from infinity to closest and you'll see the framing change even though you didn't zoom out.
The problem here for still photography is when you want to do a close/tight headshot. When it focus breathes to less than 200mm, you don't get the 200mm background compression that many want. One might as well just get a 135mm lens with a wider aperture if this is what they want to use a 70-200 for.
However, if you want do photograph things far away, you'll get awesome bang for your buck. That's where the Tamron will shine.
The Emo Emu you actually see a clear focus breathing with the Tamron in many of these images at realistic distances. It clearly has less reach.
Based on your recommendation, I purchased the Tamron version and I am very happy with it
can't wait for this G2 release in Indonesia.. damn this lens is something for the $1300 price...! thx for your review JP..!
too bad, the price has increased in Indonesia, it cost about Rp. 21 million thanks to Halodata, new distributor of Tamron in Indonesia.
One of the best comparison videos I've seen while spending my last week on CZcams watching camera/lens reviews/comparisons. At first I was a bit worried by the length of the video but you gave so many details and kept it "breathing", time was flying by when I watched through the whole thing. And I like your style of making videos!
How can you tell the difference between a lens that is "off" versus human error? I just picked up the 70-200 G2 based on the great reviews it received. However, none of the photos I have taken, a few portraits and a large number at softball games, appear sharp to me. Where I can, I have looked for the sharp portion of the photo versus where I thought I was focusing (I am using a Nikon D750). Clearly, in a number of photos, the sharp area on the ground (in the batter's box or around second base) is in front of and ends prior to the photo subject. I don't have this problem with the Sigma 150-600 but that may be a combination of focal length and aperture that gives me more room for error. The "problem" with the Tamron is driving me crazy because I don't know if it is the lens or the photographer. What I do know is that I am not happy with the sharpness when it comes to faces.
I have this lens and it's pretty well sealed against the weather. I am not a professional and using Jared's comments about being a pro who would use the lens heavily vs. a non-pro who might or would not use it as heavily, I believe this lens would hold up well. The lens is heavy. After all it's a constant aperture F2.8 so there's a lot of glass inside. Let's be honest: both Canon and Nikon can and will charge more for their native lenses than 3rd party manufacturers and to an extent, they get away with that because they are the BIG BOYS in the game who make their own lenses to suit the cameras they market and sell. Tamron does not sell cameras so in essence they are just a third party competitive provider of alternative lenses to the original native manufacturers.
Tamron and Sigma are about giving the consumer some extra choices and I like having them around to provide those choices. I don't abuse my gear and it doesn't take a beating like the gear a pro has does. I would have fewer lenses in my bag if I had to buy all native lenses from Nikon. For what I do and at less than HALF the cost of the equivalent Nikkor lens, the Tamron version fits the bill quite nicely. In his conclusion, Jared makes the point quite well; this is a very good and more than acceptable competitor to the far more expensive Nikon equivalent.
Excellent work for Tamron!! Thanks for this detailed review!! Can't wait to see more reviews on this Tamron lens in the aspects of weather-proof, build quality, etc.!!
Nice review. I will get the Tamron. Didn't find it too heavy. Build-quality of the previous Tamron 70-200 was excellent and there is more weather seal on this G2. Besides, I can buy a second lens and still be cheaper than the Nikon.
One more comment regarding your review of the "build quality." Tamron gives you five extra years of warranty. Even as a working pro and heavy use, that is a huge difference.
Jamie Feldman I have the Tamron 24-70 f2.8 and I love it. I’ve been struggling over getting a used Nikkor II, but that’s about the same price as this new Tamron, and no warranty.
Hi Jared, I purchased a Tamron 2.8 70-200 15 years ago for Nikon cameras and it is still working great, sharp with great color, this one is probably even better. Thanks for the great reviews, God bless you, Al
If Jared ever forgets to take dead cat he can simply put mic in his hair.
Hi Jared, here in Australia, Tamron also offers a two month full money back return deal with no questions asked.
I have watched about ever comparison of the Tamron 70-200mm G2 against Nikons and Canon versions of the same focal length. And Jarod you did a wonderful job of a "Real World" review vs clinical numbers and focus breathing comparisons. I know the married couple reviewers (you know who) trashed the Tamron G2 for bokeh and Focus breathing. Yet when I see your pixel peeping the bokeh I don't see any issues in a "Real World" review. Angry camera dude helped me get over the focus breathing issue. For me the Tamron G2 won my money in the end. Thanks for doing this review, miss you shooting Nikon.
I think a real test would be to cover a sport in challenging light. Honestly, you can use most inexpensive glass to cover sports on a bright day.
Exactly. I've been scouring over reviews of the Tamron and Sigma 70-200 f2.8 lenses but find little mention or sample pics of people using them in light sports conditions. I have a son that plays hockey and my Canon 100-300 f4 is about useless indoors but shines in outdoor rinks and for soccer and baseball.
Yes ... I like to take photos at dog shows (most are in low lighting, indoor arenas) and have terrible trouble with noise. I have the Tamron version of this lens on a D7500.
I love how you shoot these reviews because you get an idea of the reach you're getting.
I tested Tamron vs Nikon vs Sigma 70-200's) in the mid nineties on a Nikon F5 (35mm film). In both Nikon and Sigma there was significant lens flare while almost nothing in Tamron. I was shooting people in backlit situations to get that special aura in their hair, outdoor portraits, and lit up from a flash fro the front. I then sold out of all my Sigmas as they really was a problem. I know there has been a lot of development since, but I still have several of my Tamrons from that time, and they still works great on DX Nikons, allthoug they do not perform as a modern lens, slower focus and no VR. But still no lensflare in backlit. And they are robust enough.
Great video Jared. Lengthy but not boring. Not a fan of pixel peeping. I must say the scuffing is annoying on my Tamron 15-30 lens cap.
I think this 70-200 from Tamron is a winner.
You can literally buy another Tamron if it breaks down for the price of the Nikon!
However, for me the Nikon is more compelling for the working distance when I want to shoot shy critters. I already own the VR2 so I'll def wait for a bit for th price to drop.
I don't know why it's so expensive in USA but in Asia/Hong Kong the 70-200 is $2200. Not $2800.
I see both you and Mr Angry are on the same page. With so much positive vibes How can I go wrong. I am going to buy the Tamron. Thanks for the great review
Doc
I have the Tamron 70-200 G2. Did anyone have problems with calibration. I have sent mine off to Tamron to have it calibrate to the Camera.
I am considering trading the Nikon 80-200 for this becausevof the VR. I have noticed using the D500 with the grip the 80-200 was causing camera shake. I shot the 200-500 with hardly any camera shake.
I love the review. I would go for the Tamron. My Nikon D 7100 would work really well with it. I do have the 16-300 mm Tamron and I feel its an all around lens. I am not a pro so most of my lens are used. For me it is great for the budget.
Thank you so much for doing this review! I've wanted the 70-200 2.8 lens for a long time, and finally can purchase it. It's been a tough struggle deciding between the Tamron and the Nikon as I do need to worry about money. I greatly appreciate you going out there and shooting a baseball game as I love to shoot my son playing ball. :)
at 23:45 ish comparing the portrait shots, the difference is again in focus - the Tamron shot has the person's hair on his cheek in perfect focus, whereas the Nikon shot is focused further back, on his eye. I agree with your assessment overall, I think difference in the performance of the photographer will have a much greater effect on photos than which lens they're using in this instance!
Thank you so very much for this comparison. I am moving up from my Nikon d90 with my Nikon 70-300 5.6 to a Nikon d750 and the 70-200 2.8 but wasn’t sure which to purchase. Now I know I can go with the Tamron since I am not a professional. I mainly shoot high school sports as a hobbyist and to capture those moments for my son and his teammates :)
Again, kudos and thank you!!
Bless whoever edited this. So many cuts.
Joey Cordeiro my pain is your gain
Thank you for your real time review of the Tamron 70-200mm. I finally picked up one based on this review and I 'm very happy I did ,thank you again Jared!
Hard to judge as in many cases the focus differs in the two images, which is why people do more controlled test. Take 23.54 for example, you would think the Nikon has the upper hand around the eye, but then you realise the Tamron shot has focus on the outer eye (can be clearly seen with the spot where the eyebrow ends and the cheekbone whiskers). Say what you want about brick wall test, but for a detail analysis such as on corner sharpness and pixels this is the way to go as it greatly reduces human error. A baseball game is a good way to test focusing real world through :)
All round decent video with good detailed information. Was a little confused to start looking at the video as at one point I saw you using the D5 but with the info in the image processing showing D500 later on. Maybe as a suggestion, telling your audience exactly what equipment will be used on real world tests?
+Paul Feeley I mentioned what I'm using. Some images are D5 most are d500 and I put up all the files.
Fantastic test! I just bought the 24-70mm version and am extremely pleased with it so far. I reckon this one should be next on my list.
You are fantastic! Just bought the Tamron 24-70 F2.8 for exactly the reasons you describe. I'm not a professional, it's my first "fast"lens, and the difference in price simply made the Tamron a better option for me. Thanks!
Have had my Tamron 70-200 2.8 G2 for two months. A fantastic lens. No regrets.
This is why I watch your most of the videos. Its so clear and comprehensible explanation with details. Thats what we all crave for. Fantastic video.
Nice comparison!!! Can you also compare the:
- Tamron 24-70 f2.8 VC €1.000
- Nikon 24-70 f2.8 VR €2.250
Is image stabilisation necesarry for these lenses?
- Sigma 24-70 f2.8 (without stabilisation) €700
- Tokina 24-70 f2.8 (without stabilisation) €1.000
I want to upgrade to a D750 with Tamaron 70-200 G2 and a 24-70. But as a student, my budget is small and want to know the opportunities between these big price differences.
I got myself a Tamron 24-70mm (A007) three years ago after watched another comparison video with the Canon one made by another youtuber. I thought, hmm, it's not as good as Canon but definitetely is not a bad one. Soon I realised the sharpness is not that good, and image quality at corners are very bad, I didn't use it much. It seems like the performance of this lens was not the same as in the video. It looks like this Tamron 70-200 G2 lens had a great improvement and I can't tell difference with Nikon one in terms of image quality. Thinking of getting this one, hope this time the lens performs as what I expect.
The focus of my Tamron 24-70mm is very accurate and fast, so I don't think there will be any problem in focusing with models after A007.
Swing the tripod foot down so you can rest your right hand on it and you'll pretty much eliminate the issue of bumping the focus ring. Same trick works on the newer Nikon lens, but it doesn't feel quite as comfortable to me.
After viewing this video, I think I will get the Tamron 70-200. Can't beat the price and the results are so close, it's a no-brainer. Plus, I am not a professional. Thanks for the review.
I ordered the Nikon fl E today from BH on sale for $2200.00 with insurance. It came down to what you said about legacy and reputation that Nikon has. Thanks for a thorough report on both lenses.
Jared, since you really can't tell a difference in sharpness with a 21MP sensor, would it make sense to do a quick followup using your new D850 taking other types of real world images?
he used the d500 which is a 1.5 crop factor camera, so the pixel density you get is the almost the same as in the d850 when croping its photos to that same ratio. We are basically seeing 1.5 croped images of what a 30mp full frame camera would get you. I think it is enough.
What i think it would be worth reveiwing from a ff camera is the sharpness in the corners of the frame, as a crop factor camera does not reach that areas so we missed that spot from the lenses. But again, theres nothing wrong with the megapixels.
Fantastic video. Enjoyed every single minute of it. :)
thanks Bruno!
I have the 70-200 and its excellent. not a singl complaint shot on various Nikons.
I bought the 80-200 2.8 AF-D, I think you must do a review of this old lady! In my opinion, the best cost benefit in Nikon telephoto
because of this review, I bought the Tamron 70-200 f2.8 G2, use it on my EOS R5, fantastic.......... thankyou Jared
Now I have the Tamron 70-200 f2.8, and I’m thrilled. You really helped me make the right decision for me.
I've owned both for for a while, the Tamron does a great job but where you find the shocking difference is build quality. I'll still be using the Nikon in 15 years. When the Tamron dies in 3 or 5 years. I wont be replacing it, while I'll still be shooting the Nikon.
They both perform awesomly, but the Nikon is slightly better, and will last for decades. The tamron is quite cheaper in build quality overall
For me personally, a teenager who wants faster glass for portraits or sports so i can make some cash on the side- i'll use the Tamron to pay for itself and an Nikkor upgrade 🤷♂
Great review and very honest on all the comments great job!
For the hobbyist, I think that the Tamron offers the best value. For professionals (making money doing their photography) obviously the Nikon probably makes more sense. However, the zoom thing you're talking about has to do with the focus breathing from what I've read. I've read that Nikon's 2.8's tend to focus breath more than the Tamron (heard about this on the VR II version -- not sure if it still holds true on the newest FL version). From what I've seen elsewhere, I think the Tamron focus breathes a little less so it's probably truer to a true 200mm at 200mm (+/- a mm or two). Either way, I think with the G2 they have a good lens here for the price. Although the FL did just drop in price down to $2500 now, but still a decent gap (you could buy one or two other lenses for that extra $1000). The other thing is if you do get the Tamron, be sure to get the dock as the likeliness you're going to need to tweak is pretty good, as copy to copy variation is probably higher than with the NIkon (so basically you're partially paying for better QC with the NIkon in that extra $1000-1300).
Also if you think about it, you could buy two Tamrons (each has 5 year warranties) so you get 10 years of warranty basically, for the same price as the Nikon.... something to keep in mind. So even if the focus motors don't last quite as long you do have a decent warranty and you could buy two of these and still have spent the same amount of money as the Nikon. I had an original VR version, which was known to have AF motor issues (replaced it once when I got the lens,
and decided not replace it a second time as it would have cost about half of the value of the lens, so I sold it). If you really want a Nikon though, maybe consider the VR II version, which can be had used for less than the G2, but you will probably be foregoing a warranty.
just got my tamron 70-200 g2 fro my canon 6d. couldn't be happier! I had 70-200 2.8 is ii canon, and to be honest no difference. an amazing lens.
Got a D750 and in the market for a f2.8 70-200. You've certainly sold it to me. Thanks.
Thanx this is a great review. I think I will go with the Tamron G2 for my D7200
I am thinking the same!
did you get it, and how is it? I own a D7200 as well. thinking about getting this lens.
D7200 user here. i got my copy 2 weeks ago. it got a bit of back focusing issue but was able to fix it using AF fine tune in the camera. Test ur copy thoroughly, otherwise its a lovely lens!
7200 user here as well... is it even better than an used nikon vrii 20-200? cuz they cost pretty much the same
Melanie M. Leay Rettally Do you mean the Nikon 18-200 VRII? There really isn't any comparison. Although the 18-200 does cover the range of this lens, it's much slower and less sharp than this lens so not good for sports as seen here, and not as good for portraits since it has a slower aperture and you can't blur backgrounds as well. The 18-200 is nice for general photography if you just want one convenient lens to walk around with, though.
I still use my rapid strap that I bought when I met you in St Petersburg 4-5yrs ago. Great Strap. It's holding up great too
On the face of the player, the Tamron is focused on the side of the face, while the Nikon was focused on the eye.
That's what I thought. The Tamron was focussed between his eyebrow and hairline rather than his eye and eyebrow like the Nikon.
Another important question is:
- Even if the build quality of the Tamron isn't as good as the Nikon's, lasting less years, you still need to consider that for the price difference you can still buy a brand new Tamron again or even some other glass that may or may not be released in the mean time. I would only take Nikon if I had lots of banked cash, even if I was making money with my pictures.
IMHO there was a very slight difference in favour of the Nikon. A couple of the shots appeared to have slightly cleaner colours with the Nikon. Apart from that, it was too close to call. If I was a pro I'd get the Nikon but only for the Nikon backup service for pro photographers. An excellent review BTW Jared. Thanks very much.
I just ordered the Tamron, based on this and other credible reviewers. Six year warranty keeps my mind at ease with regards to build quality.
Been waiting for this review...trying to decide what to do myself. Thanks for the great review and samples.
Very good video from beginning to end.
how will the tamron G2 focus perform on nikon D810 compare to on D500 ? will it be 80% as good as D500? i know that D500 have better focus.system
Jared did you have any issues with the images being soft at 200mm? I'm having that issue a lot and I don't know why.
Dude, I love your videos. But if you tell me you live in a loft one more time....
Amen. If I could just skip everything that isn't him talking about the gear, his videos would be so much easier to watch.
So why do you look and listen then? Why do you spend the time, telling what you think about his voice? Talk about low level .....
That's what I like! I have ADHD, and listening to some of these people s l o w l y go over how to do anything photography related loses my interest.
@@Vegetableswithpants Have to keep in mind that any of these videos might be someone's first Jared Polin video, or even the first lens review video in their life. The ability to skip forward is there for a reason.
The Tamron G2 looks great- but the Nikon hands down spanks the Tamron for colors, color separation, contrast, saturation.. You could easily see it in the direct nikon-tamron comparisons..
I love at 08.49 you’re talking to yourself, I’m glad I’m not the only one that does that
I've had the G2 for a couple of weeks now and I haven't taken it off of my D750 yet
ron topp - I have it as well and LOVE IT. Versatile and takes great shots in so many situations. It and the Sigma F/1.4 85mm prime are the lenses I like to use the most - obviously for different things!
Did you calibrate your g2 lens..?? I own the 24-70 g2 which front focus so much..
Just bought the Tamron SP 70 - 200 G2 per your recommendation. Shooting with a Nikon D-500. Thinking of purchasing a Tamron 24 -70 G2
next. Cheers!