Contextual Hadith (Asbab al-Nuzul) is a Sham
Vložit
- čas přidán 5. 06. 2024
- Discord: / discord
Quran Study App: apple.co/46v1Azk
Video Notes: qurantalkblog.com/2024/05/19/...
Spotify: spoti.fi/30MB7Nw
Podcast: apple.co/2lLnsFE
Twitter: / talkquran
Quran Talk Blog: qurantalkblog.com/
Quran Study Website: www.quranstudyapp.com/grid
Additional Resources: www.quraniclabs.com/
Witness A Miracle: qurantalk.gitbook.io/quran-in...
Refuting typical arguments against Quran alone: qurantalk.gitbook.io/hadith-r...
This is a very valuable video. Thank you
Great video, I watched the full reference video and it was mind blowing 😮
Power to the Mu'min 💪🏾
Amazing video. The idea that Asbab al-Nuzul is an excuse that people use to justify the use of hadith is null if the weak reports we already have is contradictory & cover such a small % of the Quran. Praise God, great video.
How do you explain Hadiths such as, there will come a time when Arabs will compete with other nations to build tall towers. If you reject this it would be the same as saying someone else other than the prophet has knowledge of the future, and this is just one hadith some of them when you do an in depth analysis are insane. Directly rejecting this from being from the prophet is the same as saying you believe someone other than a prophet of God has knowledge 1400 years into the future. But only Allah has knowledge of the unseen and only he can give it. It's clear the prophet was given such knowledge.
@@SoldierOfAlIahyeah buddy i’m sure people didn’t know that muslims were going to build tall buildings in the future😂I think if takes minimal brain cells to figure out that considering they saw tall buildings from the Romans and Persians they were fighting and thought “hmm we can build that too!” and made up a hadith about the prophet predicting something they were already doing😂sorry excuse to adhere to such a corpus💀❤️
@@mandoman51 Lol, you dont understand hadith science, we can do ICMA analysis majority of Hadiths can be traced back to the prophet.
Second of all the hadith is much deeper, especially considering the context of the hadith, its much more intricate than the way you put it, its obvious you have no knowledge of the quran or Hadiths.
Thirdly how do you explain the tunnels in Hejaz hadith, go study it in detail you wont be able to come up with a good explanation.
Also you have a problem such as Hadiths with, arabia will once again return to a land of meadows and rivers, arabia was a land of rivers and meadows 5000 years ago, and during the prophets time and the time the hadith was written arabia was a desert, with small pockets of rivers scattered deep/ hidden in specific places but no actual meadows and rivers, it was hugely just desert and rock. And currently arabia is transforming back to meadows and rivers. What explanation do you have? None, I used to think you guys were somewhat smart but after getting into academics I found out that you guys are just laymen with no knowledge of anything.
@@mandoman51 this guy should call himself " soldier of the short bus "
some of the hadiths could b true. but only some. @@SoldierOfAlIah
Nice job 👍🏼
Of course God only teaches the Quran and not Hadith from the human hand... God also clarify Quran is the Best Hadith and never God command u to believe other than Quran as ur System (Deen) of Life.
*One Doctor of Islam from Egypt debated to show that Bukhari was a project of Yahood*
He was def not the first one to come to that hypothesis. Many ahadith mention much about jews in unnecessary context.
@@zaidmuhammad6343
If one reads every word of Book "Bukhari" *with an honest unbiased mind;* to him, it will be 100% clear that Bukhari was a hypocrite. Because numerous stories of his book badly insult Prophet, and repeatedly attack and discredit Quran; and a True Muslim Author will NEVER stuff such blasphemous stories in his book
@abdar-rahman6965 I can't speak for 100% of hadith as there may be some bit of truth associated to our Prophet, however there are too many contradictions in the hadith. I agree, much disrespect to the Prophet in both Bukhari and Muslim. Those who fabricated ahadith will be questioned on that day.
@@zaidmuhammad6343
*A Muslim is absolutely not in need of to know about Prophet Mohammad more than what is given in Quran.* Prophet, 4 Caliphs and Prophet's all companions left behind not a single page of Tafsir, Sunnah and hadiths.
Therefore; hadiths can be classified only as hearsay folkloric hocus pocus mostly coming from people of the book, Zanadqa, and Zoroastrians;, and faith and Sharia cannot be built on such hocus pocus.
Quran is enough for Muslim 16:89, 6:114, 25:30, 10:15, 6:19, 28:85; this is why: Prophet and his companions left behind only written Quran; *THEY LEFT BEHIND NO ANY manuscript of HADITH OR SUNNAH OR TAFSIR.*
In fact it is written in several books of Sunni sect that Rasool and 4 Caliphs burned and banned all hadiths
@abdar-rahman6965 I am not saying to follow the hadith or any hadith. I can only say leave it and follow only the Qur'an. A lot of hadith are hocus pocus for sure.
If the Quran provides the details of everything, what are the details of how angels can speak ?, do they have a toungue and vocal chords , do they make sound when they speak ?, how did they speak to Mohammed ? , I want the details.
That is a detailed explanation of everything as pertaining to the Deen, NOT a detailed explanation of everything in existence ....good grief. Use your rational faculties people!
@@keithzagg3513 Quran does not mention circumcision or how to pray ,these are requirements of the Deen or are they not ?
@@ultrasignificantfootnote3378 That's because the ritual prayer you are doing was encoded later and Salat is not a ritual. Even birds do Salat according to the Quran. You think they first have to do wudu etc?
And the number of your group who even memorise quran?
What Qira'ah do you use
MashAllah
❤
SubhanAllah
Superb 👍👍👍 Hadith compilers were indeed Munafiqs of *Baatni Tehreek.* They forged those hadiths in order to bend and twist translation of verses of Quran as they wish
I am still so shocked as to how this could possibly be a controversial take. I would think it’s more controversial to claim that the Qur’an isn’t clear or complete or detailed. God literally tells us in multiple surahs that the Qur’an is perfect and nothing else is needed, and yet we refuse to listen. Lord help us 🤲
I think one of the healthiest ways to tackle the problem is through the Mu'tazila methodology, which is to rely on the Quran first, rationality and only Mutawattir hadiths (with many independent chains of transmission) that don't contradict the Quran or rationality.
Does god exist with his essence with us?
@@flaror3496 I don't understand your question, can you rephrase it please?
@@Mutazili I think the mutazilites believed that god exists with them with his essence, do you believe that?
And how does that not put limits on god?
@@flaror3496 We don't believe that, we believe God is absolutely transcendental, He is not bound by time and space and unlike His creation.
Nice
The Bible, Avesta, and Vedas indicate that revelation and inspiration were part of the message of the prophets.
Hadith is almost a carbon copy of the Talmud. Change my mind
🤡... Change my mind
What is the earliest manuscript of your Talmud? I don't think it's before 7th century.
@@1986flawlys nice of you showing a portrait of your mother
How have they mocked Book of God! They concocted Asbab-Nazool story for verse 11:114 that a man kissed a woman illegally, so God told Muslims to pray Two time Rituals to expiate sins of that man
it doesn't say they have to do it for that reason. you just added that.
here is the link: www.altafsir.com/Books/Asbab%20Al-Nuzul%20by%20Al-Wahidi.pdf
Let's help her!
Praise God. Excellent video!
Only if you had read anything about linguistics in general, you would realise how underdetermined the "meaning" of a text is. The context that helps to reduce the indeterminacy of a text is as important as the text itself. If you don't employ hadith or seerah or history in general at all, you can make out of a text, whatever you intend you, and i am suspecting that is one of your motivations for being a "quranist", because your personal judgements about the world dont seem to comply with orthodox interpretations of the quran and you just want to reinterpret it, just so that quran can comply with your moral or other judgements. Read W.V.O quine or derrida or literally any theory of language to realise your error. A text, without context, has a more floating meaning.
Ok.. how many rakats in maghrib salat?
Allah said to follow and obey the messenger peace be upon him... How???
How did muslims pray for 200 years before the collecting of Hadith? They taught each other, it's called practical sunnah, you don't need a hadith for that.
@@mohamedroshdy5441the Hadith are just the ‘practical sunnah’ written down
@@mohamedroshdy5441 Who told them how to pray aslan?
Obey the messenger of course, he was a mercy for mankind and he had his book reciting it to the people as a warner, and if you obey him you are obeying God, he was an example for the people, as is Abraham written also in the Quran. The mode of prayer around the world is different. I've been to many mosques and they all have a different way of praying, extra prayers, some shorten prayers, some put their hands differently and so forth. What is important is your intent to pray and a basic form that looks as a muslim prayer. There is no hadith book that has a uniform way to pray from beginning to end. As there is no hadith book that has the adhan called as it is today. So let's not worry about ''how do we pray'', as if that will uphold the hadith claim. We know how to pray from those passed down us the info before us. That's what's important. There are some references in hadith on prayer as there is in the Quran, bow with those that bow and prostrate, salat meaning physical prayers.
You want to get some references from hadith you can, but you will see it's full of contradictions. It's good to read so you know firsthand. How to pray and what to do, is not the issue here, it's sources of new law outside of the Quran and after the Quran that is the problem. They created laws based on absurd allegations to the prophet (PBUH), and absurd explanations that also contradict not only each other but also science and the Quran. And another question which hadith? There are a number of sects, each having their own hadith and each claiming there are no mistakes.
You remember Sheikh Albani, he was a famous scholar on hadith, he devoted his whole life on the study of them. After studying for years he came with the conclusion that even authentic hadith can't be 100% athentic after finding mistakes with over 300 hadith he dubbed weak even after a 1000 years of people thinking they were correct. The only thing Allah will protect is the Quran, it's the only thing that is the real authentic hadith.
How can we know the Qur'an we read is authentic? From Sanad.
How can we know the Hadith, that the qur'aniyyun reject, is authentic? From Sanad.
Simple.
- If you think we use inauthentic Hadith that scholars said authentic, publish a book about it.
- If you think we don't need authentic hadith, then it's the same as saying we don't need to know what the Prophet ﷺ said and did.
وَالنَّجْمِ إِذَا هَوَى (1) مَا ضَلَّ صَاحِبُكُمْ وَمَا غَوَى (2) وَمَا يَنْطِقُ عَنِ الْهَوَى (3) إِنْ هُوَ إِلا وَحْيٌ يُوحَى (4)
_"By the star when it descends. Your companion [i.e., Muḥammad] has not strayed, nor has he erred. Nor does he speak from [his own] inclination. It is not but a revelation revealed."_
~ QS An-Najm 1-4
There is no sanad of the Quran. We have Sanad of the Hadiths, Quran was revealed in 7 Ahrufs according the Hadiths and each had different reciters and we don’t know who recited this and passed it from the Prophet. Allah said he will preserve this Book, not the teachings of the Prophet
@@Hilman_Faiz You presumed, _"If you think we use inauthentic Hadith that scholars said authentic, publish a book about it."_
There is no need to waste time writing any book because the Sahihs Bukhari/Muslim et al are only _"authentic"_ to the Sunnis, Shiites & Sectarians.
_peace_
*The Quran is its own dictionary. The Quran explains everything in detail to a Muslim.*
@@shukriyusof2104 The Qur'an refers you to earlier sources and cites many others without specific mention but these are known to the scholars and the chosen ones.
@@TheOwlTheOne "we don't know who wrote this, but it's written that this book is divinely inspired so everything in it must be true"
Sounds similar? That's exactly what christian said.
You don't know the sanad of Qur'an doesn't mean there is no sanad.
There can be no doubt that the Quran is the best Tafsir. At the same time how many times does he talk about those who possess intelligence who ponder upon his signs. They make clear. Meaning we can't add verses, but we can verify verses through science, history, and whatever other faculty. Remember the people of Ad and Iram who he destroyed they built lofty towers. No one knew where they were at the time of the prophet. There was no way to explain it. And then they were found in 1973 and it confirmed what the Quran was saying as was the Pharoah found also again confirming it. Allah tells us us to study and read, confirm.
There was this sea captain who spent a lot of time at the sea, then he met a muslim. He asked the muslim is there anything in the Quran that talks about the ocean and sea? He said yes, so he read it. The captain asked did Mohammed spend time in the ocean, he said no he was a dessert dweller far away from the ocean. He accepted Islam after reading how the waves were explained. He said this can only be known by someone who either travels the sea much, or from God.
I'm not a muslim. But in my opinion the stance that the hadith is necessary would mean that Allah did not or could not fit all the relevant messages through his book.
I'm however not saying that Quran is a book with consistency.
The better position for a muslim would be to follow the Qur'an alone.
If you wanted literally every single islamic teaching and command then you’d have yourself a 30 000 page book that would probably be too complicated to read and impossible to memorize. The quran says obey allah and his messenger. So when we establish that something comes from God, we follow it. Including teachings and commands by prophet muhammad pbuh because they would be coming from God, not his own head.
@@IbnKahwaji nothing is impossible for god
@@tradehut2782 i didnt say anything about impossibility. I think you missed the point. Read what I wrote inshallah you’ll get it.
@@IbnKahwaji it was god who designed us in such a way that it would be impossible for us to memorize a 30k page book. Everything is designed by him according to Islam.
So i see it has his shortcoming that the Qur'an is an incomplete work and you need to rely on hadiths for a total understanding.
@@tradehut2782 that is only your own opinion based on false assumptions and/or a false understanding of the quran and what it commands. Allah explicitly says in the quran that there is revelation outside the quran and to obey Allah and his messenger.
@Safina Society
How do you explain Hadiths such as, there will come a time when Arabs will compete with other nations to build tall towers. If you reject this it would be the same as saying someone else other than the prophet has knowledge of the future, and this is just one hadith some of them when you do an in depth analysis are insane. Directly rejecting this from being from the prophet is the same as saying you believe someone other than a prophet of God has knowledge 1400 years into the future. But only Allah has knowledge of the unseen and only he can give it. It's clear the prophet was given such knowledge.
this was no knowledge of the future.
Yemenis already built tall buildings LOOOOOOONG before mohamed existed
The verse describes impoverished possibly naked Bedouin, also tall towers in the time of Muhammad would be referring to 5 stories and above
With this nonsense, the Qur'an should have just been revealed in one day, since we now have to believe none of it's verses have any relevance to the Prophet's (saw) life and actions .
You sound like a true Yahudi
Read verses 25:31-33 as to why it was revealed slowly.
@@alihijazi2655 The Qur’aan also tells us to follow the Prophet’s[saw] commands. They form part of the sharia. I suspects this video is complaining there is no science of ahadith to tell us the authentic from the forged ahadith. This implies the companions were not good at relaying the Prophet’s[saw] commands, which contradicts the Qur’aan, as Allah[swt] states he is pleased with the ansar and muhajirs. Even more ridiculous, Umar was the Caliph for 10 years, are you suggesting there was no learning of the Prophet’s[saw] Sunna in that time ?
@@sparephone8228 there is no verse in the Quran telling us to follow the prophet or Muhammad, they tell us to follow the rasool. If you read most of the verses Allah and the rasool is conjugated in singular form (I.e. the message). A rasool is someone who has a message. You cannot follow the Quran without following the messenger as he is the one revealing the message. Furthermore, there are 322 verses in the Quran where Allah tells Muhammad specific instructions you cannot follow them without following the messenger. Also, there are three verses where Allah states the only duty of the messenger is to reveal the message. Obeying the messenger does not refer to a book written 200 years afterward.
The Quran that it is its own best tafsir.
@@alihijazi2655 Ah now we are beginning to understand your problem. The Qur'aan specifically states to obey the Prophet[saw]. And yes he is also called 'rasool'. The terms 'nabi' and 'rasool' both apply to Muhammad[saw]. As other people commenting have pointed out, you cannot pray salat, perform hajj, fast without explanation from the sunna. The same goes for zakat in principle. You think the 'sunna' is the textbooks of hadith, written 200 years later, actually in the case of Imam Malik much earlier. Textbooks of hadith are not 'sunna'. Sunna is the living practice of the Muslim community. Umar was caliph for 10 years. He would have led the daily prayers from the Prophet's[saw] masjid everyday. He was also emir for the hajj. Where did Umar learn this from ? the Prophet[saw]! Further evidence, look at the first breakaway sect, the Khawarij, who are now the peaceful Ibadi sect in Oman. Is there in any difference in their method of salat? sure, they have some bizarre obsession with takfir of rulers. As for the science of ahadith, You, yourself rely on it! The recitation of the Qur'aan has been transmitted by the companions, through their students. The original copies of the Qur'aan have no vocalisation. They only have the skeletal Arabic script. Vowel markers may have come maybe a 100 years later. For you to read the Qur'aan, you are relying on a recitation transmitted !! whether its Hafs or warsh.
Does israel run this channel or something? One scroll through the videos and it shows how the content creator knows nothing about islam. “Sunnis follow the sunnah of the jewish people” lol ! Wallahi I’d take a fatwa from a rabbi than from this video creator. May God guide you to the right path
Stop talking about things you know nothing about.
Ismailism has done a number on you. It's sad.
Change my mind, the main reason people reject hadith is because it makes it easier for them to follow their own desires.
Why, as a Muslim, would you not accept a sahih hadith that has a clear chain of narration? I’m genuinely curious
Nah, in fact every Quranists are following their own desire by interpreting Quran by themselves, whereas a true believer will not follow BLINDLY what others told as Muhammad's teachings.
Plus, ones are not a Muslim if he denies sahih hadith without good argument. Quran is God's word, Hadith is Muhammad's word but still, every word of Muhammad are guided by God. The difference between Quran and hadith is that the Quran are promised to be preserved.
"He does not speak out of (his own) desire." Quran 53:3
Because even the Sahih hadiths are extremely weak from an academic and scholastic approach, it’s like one long game of telephone
@wangeomatic following verses
6:19 only quran is inspired and impart
@@muhammadnuralhafiz verse 2:129, you see, the verse you give doesnt say Quran is the only revelation
@@muhammadnuralhafiz bro, you got good name, name of our prophet and you think the things he teach in hadith is nothing? Hadith is a science, a technology, a biotech using human memory and personality, the first data storing system and not just that, its authenticated. I leave you with this, if you learn basics about hadith then you know the scholars of hadith is inhuman, this not me saying, its quran scholars that said that. Hadith scholars are the one who protecting our Prophet's pbuh teaching so that the normal people dont go believing some lying people essily.
Someone explain how you know how to pray without ahadith? How many rakaat per prayer? What is the wording of the tashahhud?
The Quran says:
و أطيع الله و أطيع الرسول
Obey Allah and *obey the messenger*
Both come together.
قال رسول الله "انما اتيت القران و مثله"
و يقول الله فى القران "و اطيعوا الله و الرسول لعلكم ترحمون"
هذا الحديث و هذه الآية يكفيان لتحطيم الفيديو التافه بتاعك.
Be quiet Yahud
﴿قُل لَّئِنِ اجْتَمَعَتِ الْإِنسُ وَالْجِنُّ عَلَىٰ أَن يَأْتُوا بِمِثْلِ هَٰذَا الْقُرْآنِ لَا يَأْتُونَ بِمِثْلِهِ وَلَوْ كَانَ بَعْضُهُمْ لِبَعْضٍ ظَهِيرًا﴾
17:88 Say, "If mankind and the jinn gathered in order to produce the like of this Qur'an, they could not produce the like of it, even if they were to each other assistants
I'm using the holy Quran against your Hadith. What does that say about you? Where do you stand?
@@ghostV225 I just gave a verse of the Quran as well. We are obliged to follow and trust The Prophet by the QURAN itself.
﴿ قُلْ إِن كُنتُمْ تُحِبُّونَ اللَّهَ فَاتَّبِعُونِي يُحْبِبْكُمُ اللَّهُ وَيَغْفِرْ لَكُمْ ذُنُوبَكُمْ ۗ وَاللَّهُ غَفُورٌ رَّحِيمٌ﴾
How will God love you and forgive your sins if you didn’t follow the Prophet and his teachings?
@@omarmansour6766 First of all the verse i mentioned earlier (17:88) completely and utterly counters your hadith. Saying that there is a book like the Quran is a very dangerous claim. So you'll first have to take accountability for that. Second of all the prophet says "follow" me, not "mimick" me. We follow the path of the prophet by obeying the book of Allah which is the Quran, really simple. There was no hadith at the time of the prophet! Hadith was written some 200 years after his death. What does that mean? It means the prophet was following the *Quran alone* , just as you should. So follow the prophet Muhammad and Ibrahim peace be upon them. And remember Allah *alone* .
@@ghostV225 Show me a verse from the Quran that the Duhr is 4 rakas.
This is a small channel but I’ll still say this: Hadith rejection places you outside the fold of Islam. Hadith were being sent down to the Prophet from Allah as well. How did he know to pray towards Al-Aqsa before the ayah came down telling him to change direction?
No where in the Quran did Allah command Muslims to pray towards Jerusalem. It was the Prophets instruction from revelation from Allah…which is not found in the Quran. Ponder on this and may you and all the other lost people find guidance
You say the same shit again and again and again in the same Video..
Keep fooling yourself, rejection of the sunnah is kufr. Deal with it.
Say, ˹O Prophet,˺ “Shall we inform you of who will be the biggest losers of deeds?
They are˺ those whose efforts are in vain in this worldly life, while they think they are doing good!”
@SafinaSociety
HEretical acount. Delete it now or suffer in Jahannam.