I'm Arresting You For Not Providing Your Details 😲😱👮♂️🎥🛸❌
Vložit
- čas přidán 9. 06. 2024
- Today we take a a look at a road which has been cordoned off by Police.
Upon arrival it was not known of the suspected crime so we tried to work it out.
We ask the PCSO controlling the cordon where the boundary was and then took the drone up for a look around.
Twice during the flight we was interrupted, the second time was by PC 4692 and PS 4381.
I wasn't impressed with the PC and PS so things started to go downhill.
Eventually, I was arrested after refusing to provide my details.
Shortly after I was de arrested and given 7 Days to provide my details.
(as the FLYER ID is not required for my size of Drone, I believed, and still believe now that I DID NOT need to provide my ID - I am obtaining clarification from the CAA about this which will be shown in a future video)
Bodycam was filming the entire time so we hear everything on this one.
We end the video with some advice to PC and PS and then the Drone Footage at the very end.
Enjoy!
____________________________________________
Q - What is your email address?
A - djaudits@gmail.com
Q - What Drone Do I Use
A - DJI MINI 2
Can be purchased here -
www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B...
Q - What Camera Do I Use
A - DJI OSMO POCKET 2
Can be purchased here -
www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B...
I'm a retired police officer , and I am appalled by the ignorance of those officers, particularly the idiot who is allegedly a sergeant.
He has no idea about the laws identifying 'suspects' and he has no idea of the laws relating the use of drones.
The detention was completely unlawful, and well done to the cameras man for not providing his drivers licence.
THE REAL PROBLEM TODAY IS THAT THE POLICE ARE TERRIFIED OF CAMERAS, AND CANNOT COPE WHEN LAW ABIDING MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TELL THEM HOW THE LAW ACTUALLY WORKS.
YET THE COURTS AND SENIOR POLICE MANAGEMENT HAVE STATED THAT PUBLIC PHOTOGRAPHY IS NOT ILLEGAL.
YET THE MORONS EMPLOYED IN THE POLICE THESE DAYS CONTINUE TO BULLY THE PUBLIC BECAUSE THEY CANT GET THEIR OWN WAY.
The sergeant had finally resort to apologising ,but then told the cameraman that he had to provide his 'permit ' for the drone within 7 days.
The requirement to produce documents within 7 days applies to matter under THE ROAD TRAFFIC ACT . That sergeant is just another ignorant bully
The other officer with him is nothing less that a prick with ears.
Keeps trying to talk when he has been told 5 minuts.
Everybody is now fully aware that the police are not here for the good of the public. Something good came out of the pandemic.
You claim to be a retired police officer, I highly doubt you was ever in the job. Your written skills are questionable to say the least, particularly when you have initiated a sentence, with the word - “Yet”.
@@ste9071 your written skills are wonderful....
@@ste9071 I would suggest that you ensure your comments are written out properly before you decide to pass judgement on another persons literacy.
These 2 cops are really examples of police recruitment hitting the bottom of the barrel …
Absolutely, shameful toads
nope , this is the cream of the crop they need people to bend the rules and intimidate the week and who fuels they ego by doing so until we are totally in fear and control.
Low calibre pigs
@Tracy you fucking mutant 😂😂😂
YOU MEAN THE BOTTOM OF THE SEWER!
The box ticker sergeant is one of the best examples why they made him a sergeant as he clearly didn't become one through intelligence.
I'm still trying to get my head around this: the Sergeant arrested him for refusing to provide his details, even though he was not legally obliged to provide his details?
@@MartinSanders-ut9qqCorrect and illegally detained him at least 5minutes. Have seen other Auditors (mainly AB) then put in court case to claim compensation for being illegally detained, even if it's only a few seconds
@@caolkyle I Hope this also becomes a civil claim. I'm not legally trained, but even I know Rice v Connolly 1966 gives a person the right to refuse to provide details unless arrested; and, that exercising Rice V Connolly 1966 cannot be used as grounds for reasonable suspicion, i.e., exercising a legal right is not a premise for a crime.
@@MartinSanders-ut9qq yeah. Thanks to auditors like DJ I’m definitely more comfortable knowing more about what’s legally expected of me as member of public.
Before I’d happily give name etc but now know it’s not mandatory to do, unless you’re being detained. Even if detained you only need to tell your details and think have 48 hours to show driving licence (for driving offences) etc
@@caolkyle Same for me mate, auditing videos encouraged me to read a few law books (e.g., Blacks) so i'm aware of my rights.
“I’ll talk to you in 5 minutes mate” - that was gold.
I can see why the station sent these Officers to stand in a field.
They are going to audition for worzel gummidge!!!
@@andrewstratford4753 Don't meet the qualifications or have the brain power. I think you just insulted scarecrows'
Shame they gave them a car for travel to & fro, bikes look more suitable, strong in the leg weak in the head....
Yep you plant turnips in a field to grow, would imagine the inspector was hoping they would grow brain cells.
The PCSO said they wanted more experience in the field. So voila , his wish was granted.🤗
Using handcuffs on a person who hasn't committed to crime is an abuse of power and excessive force.
@@shredder1uk, prove it; don't just repeat an unsupported claim.
@@shredder1uk Exactly. 💪🏻
@@shredder1uk It's called "WRONGFUL ARREST" Chris with a compensation by Law payable to The Drone Pilot.
@@Biggles2498 CORRECT
@@shredder1uk incorrect
That Sargent at 10:33 was an utter tool. From the moment he walked up it was obvious he would cause issues. His body and verbal language reeked of belligerence. Doesn't like being told no, and just can't help himself getting the last word in or being challenged.
He says he didn't step over to you, but over the course of the first minute of you both talking about how long until you land he leans in, then shuffles up to you about 4 times, each time you step back and he does it again. Leans in to you, but then doesn't lean back, but shuffles forward.
He's a liar, a creep, not listening to anything you say. Would probably gaslight anyone without cameras to cover his own arse. It's dangerous to put anyone like that in a position of power over anyone, the ignorance, combined with the belligerence, lack of self-awareness, propensity to lie, the constant passive aggressive tone, and the snap when he actually arrested you.... Get him away from any job with power or authority before he hurts someone!
You don't have to give your details to a police officer unless they specify what offence you have committed
*Suspected to have commited
If you ain't done nowt wrong, what is there to hide?
Or most importantly why refuse your details, you may not be required but if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to be afraid of. NOTHING!!
@@PaulAinsworth-nv4my don't get it do you! Do you understand how law works? What powers police have, that should be used correctly??? Hmmmmm? nah didn't think so! SO shut up unless you are a legal expert which most police officers are not! Otherwise this wouldn't have happened and wasted out tax payer's money paying their wage!
@@davedempster7658 yes, I get it, you obviously have lots to hide, refusing to give details proves it.
I felt sorry for Andrew, thought he was about to start crying. I hope he tries harder to get a grasp of the law.
He's a bellend
He has about as much chance of understanding the law as he has of making a snowball from a bucket of sand. He’s a hopeless case and so is the other dope.
i did not feel bad for him. He is an idiot
These police sadly have an institutional belief that people should instantly obey their rules and never bother to follow their own rules. That's disrespectful and drives a wedge between the police and the public. These officers approach was antagonistic based on assumption that any person with a camera is a foe..Assumption is fatal to any true investigator. The sergeant wasn't very bright (sorry) his communication skills dire and his knowledge of the law limited. The other officer is more problematic antagonistic, ill informed no people skills. He seems more suited to being a pub bouncer.
Agree
that's an insult to doormen.
You will respect my authoriteh.
Basically coppers think, I'm telling you what to do. now do it.
Purely a retaliation arrest.
No grounds just because cameraman/drone flyer knows more about the relevant laws than the coppers.
Read my separate comment to DJ
This officer arrested you for not answering a question he didn’t actually ask you 😲 Absolutely ridiculous no wonder they sent these officers to stand in a field….
I think they sent them to stand in a field BECAUSE nothing was happening there, they just wanted them out of the way of real policing.
DJ : "five minutes and you can talk". Pause...pause... "so, do you live locally round here then?". Fell on floor laughing. Impeccable comic timing.
This is a perfect example why the public does not trust the police any longer.
What is it with that fucking cop going on and on when asked, please stop talking to me I'm flying but he kept on doing it. And secondly what's with the childish attitude from the cops, fucking paranoid
It’s way beyond a trust issue now, most people see it as a bonus when they hear that a copper has been killed in the line of duty.
Some years back a copper was shot in the face with a shotgun by a man called Raoul Moat here in the north east, and Mr Moat became a regional hero and Is still.
@@wix7657 Right on Bro
@@cryptonewbie3699 I like bacon
@@wix7657 Sadly, that is true.
Their arrest was purely retaliatory; they were frustrated you were pointing out their rules violations (cameras, etc.) and generally showing the world their abject ignorance of the laws they are supposed to enforce. So they put handcuffs on you, just to retaliate and humiliate you. Shameful behavior.
ye looked like a power trip to me.... showing who is in control.
Best part is when these mugs in costumes realise they need to de-arrest you😆
This is an everyday occurrence in the States. They are known as the “ Blue line of cowardice “.
I can’t believe they arrested you. They should know the law.
Why sit in their car ? So they have a right to do this ?!
4381 Sergeant didn't state that he was recording either (or did I miss that), he hardly looks at the info offered showing that flyer ID not needed, and says you are free to go, no issues but minutes later is arresting over same points already covered - not providing a flyer ID that was established as not needed. Bullying tactics and wrongful arrest.
Very impressive how calm you stay. Also your knowledge of the law etc
It's like telling a 5 year old to be quiet for 2 minutes, it just never happens.
I assume this type of bullying approach normally works for them, when it fails they are completely lost .
They are heading in the way of being totally lost to the public already. I reckon there is very little support in the population for their bully boy tactics. Most people I know have no respect for cops and not one of the people I know have any convictions. These cops do themselves no favours ever, however I doubt that they care about that any more than they care about the general public.
@@davidlacey7982 This idiot just annoys people, he serves no purpose but to waste time and money for his sad little trainspotter ego.
@@jamesleate disagree with your comment, I think he is polite and honest without be antagonising, and that something we don’t get from a very large percentage of police
What's worse is, every court in the land has already agreed that refusing to give details when not legally obliged to is [i] not an offence, and [ii] cannot be used as grounds for suspicion of an offence (Rice v Connally 1966). Therefore, the Officer is guilty of false imprisonment and assault (Section 39 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988) as the arrest was presupposed on a false premise.
@@martinsanders6124 Pedantic anorak steps in to defend pedantic anorak for being pedantic and wasting police time.
"Yeah Cecil, teach that policeman that it is official policy to put the left handcuff on first. Let's waste everybody's time and complain about nothing,to prove we are "correct" which is important to us because we are pathetic, weak, gerbils of men who are at the very bottom of the gene pool. Being "correct" is all we have in our limp wristed, bespectacled, acne scarred, trainspotting, zeta male, brown cardigan wearing lives."
The sargeant has been promoted beyond the limit of his capability. He hasn't got a clue, he is arrogant and was determined to get you for something. Abuse of power and ignorance.
Diversity promotion ... maybe ???
@@Jester-Riddle , either a racial bias or sexual orientation. Could be either.
seargeant comes from one of the low IQ races
That's the quota system for you rather than getting promoted on merit.
Agreed. He acted contrary to PACE Section 24(5)(a) and also contrary to Rice v Connolly 1966.
Just a small point DJ --- The document you quoted from and highlighted states they 'SHOULD' verbally announce that they are recording" This seems to indicate a suggestion and not an order. An easy 'get out' for the cops if contested in a court, what it should say is 'MUST' rather than should......Just saying 🙂
Should: used to indicate obligation, duty, or correctness, typically when criticizing someone's actions.
@@rainbowdeep9234 It was clearly a typo, this isn't English class.
@@neil_mch -- yeah sure mate, there you go, off wit ya.
@@rainbowdeep9234Show me where my comment touched you.
FdX@@neil_mch
You are just exactly what I’ m looking for
This is so important for the uk 🇬🇧 👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾🙏🏾
*THE SERGEANT WAS COMPLETLY CONFUSED AND SHOULD NOT BE IN A POSITION OF TRUST TO DEAL WITH THESE INTERACTIONS*
*I FEEL THAT POLICE WHO DO WRONGDOING SHOULD BE PENALISED ,THIS WAY THEY WILL FINALY GET EDUCATED*
analyzed ?
he ticks a box hence the problem of woke policing
That's what you get with young'ns who are fast-tracked through the ranks. My understanding is if you join after leaving university, you are promoted every 2 years. Future of the police force is quite concerning. A danger to themselves and their colleagues.
Diversity hire
Absolutely agree.
As long as the police can get away with screwing up and then shrugging their shoulders nothing will change.
The only way to penalise the police, meaningfully, is to hit them in the pocket.
Set up a system whereby EVERY time a cop misunderstands a law or misapplies it, a report is raised and then then a suitably qualified expert is called in to provide training and then invoices the police authority at a suitable rate.
After a couple of years of seeing millions spent on this training, high-ranking cops will start to realise the seriousness of the problem and will start instructing cops to NOT attempt to misapply laws or use inappropriate laws when dealing with the public.
I've finally found out what the cordon was for after speaking to locals. A member of staff at the ASDA store nearby was seen to be moving several trays of doughnuts from the confectionery aisle to the reduced price shelves. The police were on it straight away, sealing off the area.
🤣🤣🤣
@@DJAUDITS Do not provide them with any ID in 7 days let them bring it to court, stand your ground 100% they are wrong in every way even if they arrest you again remain silent demand a solicitor and also do not inform them you know they are recording as not telling you and suddenly producing it in court as evidence will help your case massively and possibly make it inadmissible as evidence.
This approach will aslo save you the cost of bringing them to justice for the false arrest and multiple assaults from using the handcuffs as the judge can make the decision in your favour there and then. Just remember to make the claims as detailed as possible to the judge (recompense for time spent kidnapped, for the assaults, mental impact of being arrested and everything else you can think of)
And i wonder which one ate all the evidence? Any clues? What do those masks hide?
Yes donoughs and filming police private vehicles seems to be about the only thing police respond to these days.
Doughnuts involved! I'm surprised they didn't cancel all police leave and have the helicopter up and dogs on the ground.
And they wonder shy they are Disliked and Miss trusted by the Majority of the Public.
Just spent a whole evening exploring your content after stumbling across some on TikTok. Fascinating stuff. It’s amazing how you keep your cool. You never ask for trouble and only seem to respond with the politeness and factual info which admirable.
I'm enjoying a whole Sunday on this and it's great 👍
The law is very clear on this. You only have to provide your details if you are being arrested or reported for an offense. Not giving your details is a secondary offense only, and cannot, alone, be the grounds for an arrest. It is not an offense in and of itself.
I haven't watched the full video yet but I think there is certain section were you after ID it doesn't matter if you've committed a crime I'm not sure it's section one of p.a.c.e..... I may get back to you later if I can find the comment again👍👍👍
@@kevgray. The precedent as already been set in 1966 and pace does not over rule what's set in a high court
Rice v. Connolly (1966) is an English legal precedent holding that there is no strict, general legal duty to assist a police officer prior to any possible arrest or caution, with even basic police enquiries nor to accompany the officer to a requested location.
@@MrPhiliphoward OK I'm still watching the video so bear with
@@kevgray. fortunatly you only have to provide details to a Cuntstable if you are suspected, having or about to comit a crime. Unless they jam you up with Section 50 of PACE but they have to prove unsocial behavior for that one. If ever in dought dont say anything and dont provide anything but say very clearly and loudly that you do not wish to answer any futher questions withou your solicitor present and you would like to consult a solicitor before answering any questions then just repeat this each time you are asked somthing (its similer to pleading the 5th in america)
The first line of a police caution is "You do not have to say anything".
So no you don't have to give your details if you've been arrested or suspected of any crime.
We all have a common law right to remain silent, at all times.
These officers prove exactly why we need the auditors.
What a joke 😂😂
I still don't think it's the public duty to educate the wooden tops. Tell them as little as possible
Checks the tires!!!😂😂😂😂😂 that’s hilarious and calls out the specs 😂😂
Are you thinking that you were in the right here?.....😂😂😂😂
They should change the law so the arresting officer is personally liable in court proceedings against false arrest and such other mismanaged activity with the public.
Never gunna happen. It be like making soilders responsible. There's a reason why they don't.
@@ryanmac9628 soldiers are responsible.
They arrested you. I'd be putting in a claim for that.
Sue those corrupt cretins for false imprisonment and abuse of power 🧐
You are not required by law to carry any ID these cops need to learn the law.
If you are locked in the back of a cop car, ie child locks, is that not unlawful imprisonment?
This is an all too common thing now, that you don't actually deal with the police, you're dealing with their ego. They need way more reports against them.
Ego world, culturally subverted ourselves
Yea spot on.
Complaining won't make any difference unless it is deemed very serious, the Police hide behind PACE, the only way is to get your complaint "Heard” is get it to the Independent Office for Police Conduct even then it's an uphill battle, the only way to seek justice is in a civil court.
Or alter ego in a few cases.
I get an impression from the second office he has no desire to serve the public, who happen to pay his wages, he wants to rule the public.!!
Ilegal arrest , civil action required against the butt hurt inexperienced officer, retraining required
not retraining the sack required these illegal arrests have a huge impact on people's lives.
@@ianking8315 everyone makes mistakes
@@anonomous8719 I'm a geologist, my mistakes can kill people and destroy lives. You are not allowed to make mistakes under the burden of public responsibility.
@@anonomous8719 Do the mistakes have consequences when they are to do with your employment? I know that in my job if I make a mistake I not only will be disciplined, I can be charged and taken to court and potentially be struck off the register and no longer allowed to work in my profession. Do you think police officers should be treated differently to the rest of us? In these cases it always seems to be about ego and power and the public not doing as they are told by what are basically bullies.
@@anonomous8719 This wasn't a mistake, it was quite deliberate because their feelings and ego were hurt.
In the UK, there isn't a strict legal requirement for police to inform individuals that they're recording with body cameras. However, it's generally considered good practice, and many police departments encourage officers to notify people when their body cameras are active to promote transparency and accountability.
exactly, the policy said 'should' not 'must'. And should don't mean shit!
Should - "used to indicate obligation, duty, or correctness, typically when criticizing someone's actions."
Just a note, "should" by law is not the same as "must".
Its shocking how little they know about law - but how eager they are to get violent !
Disgraceful, shameful employees - unemployable elsewhere, except in this sector, where ignorance, aggression and thuggery is encouraged !
Thats why the police are hated & despised !
What would be shocking is discovering a police officer with even a gcse level awareness of the law. Police do not uphold the law, do not serve & protect, do not act on their oaths....it is all a smokescreen to deflect attention from their true agenda which is as corporate errand boys.
@@dyschromotopia 100% spot on comment
I have to disagree. There are some fine police officers out there. Generally they seem not to be uniform wearing officers, but Serious Crime, Fraud, Anti-Terrorism, Special Branch etc. Do you take my point?
@@TheBeaumarisEcho - If they are 'Fine' then why aren't they exposing (& arresting) the law-breaking corrupt ones ???
That simple act of 'looking the other way' is negligence in itself !
DJ agreed with their interpretation of the law because he gave his details.
Looks like malicious arrest , or if not arrest just saying that is classed as assault .
Chick sat on my lap and I felt and smelt the fart do you think that was assault?
@@JH24820 what bs you chatting you absolute cabbage
@@JH24820 the assault is for unwanted touching as the officer arrested him for a non crime making it unlawful followed by a common law assault as he was outside of his scope as a police officer
The threat of arrest is an assault,the actual arrest is the battery. Then we have false imprisonment , unlawful arrest, possibly malfeasance in a public office.
@@JH24820 You wish.
What an absolute disgrace that cop is, he just didn't like it that you knew more than him.! Also not very professional to refer to you as "Brother" I mean what has happened to British Police standards?
when they put the handcuffs on him i bet pound signs were spinning on his eyes lol like a bandit machine
Absolutely frightening. The British Police really need better training. How many times have they been told the law. That officer an embarrassment.
No the British police needs recruitment of decent British people. That pair of lowlivs didn't want to be trained, they just want to harrass those who arent't like them.
It's more than that, what's going on on this land???
Illegal arrest and false imprisonment. An awful attitude from the SGT. He needs to be held accountable for his actions that day.
You need to learn the law.
He did ask him for his details and he refused rewind it. He was kinda cocky in the video. But let's be honest I think most have problems because he's a Muslim.
@@stinga_ was he obliged to give his details?? What crime did he commit?
@@shuggiemcg1 The drone he was flying has to be registered in his name as he states the law was changed in June.
@@shuggiemcg1 it’s an offence to fail to disclose your details when an officer asks you to do so. It’s the same whether it’s this scenario or you fail to respond to the police for a driving conviction. Etc
Hope there is justice for what happened here 🙏
A complete abuse of his powers because you knew your ACTUAL rights better than he did.
😂dj knows more about the law then the law
You don't have to give any details to the police or be arrested unless they suspect you in commiting a crime.
which they did and he still didn't give them info
@@cheeseyman1 I'm pretty sure he gave them a photo of his passport.
@@rorybrowne4973 indeed he did. he caved in. shame
You're guilty till proven innocent with this crowd these days
He did commit a crime so he is required by law to ID himself, you clueless fool
It started going down hill when the sargeant kept interupting you while flying the drone. When you told him you would "talk to him in 5 mins" he looked like you had slapped him round the face. He couldn't believe anyone would talk to him like that and his ego was destroyed. He tried everything after that jolt, even arresting you, which was totally over the top as well as illegal. The pair of them were rude, unprofessional and egotistical, a claim or complaint would definately be in order as these two jokers think they can carry on like this, one even said he DOSEN'T have to inform a member of the public when their bodycam is switched on, the other said they DO. It's the illegal arrest that i would not let slide.
It's so great that DJ is clude up on the police policys , great mannered man well done get them reported asap !!!
Well done to inform us what happened. You can write a book now. Haha inspired in your imagination.
@@ruthmaldonadoponton1189 What ???
Not me either 👍
Let it slide☝
They just wants to show us who´s in control, ignorance of those officers
Absolutely.
The ethnic copper looks like he is straight out of the comedy “come fly with me”
Thought the same thing !!!!
Police were exceptionally unprofessional, using cuffs as a first resort is always a sign that it’s purely a power trip
Culturally incompatible.
@@sirvivor7835 you know 👍🏻
In this instance the use of handcuffs was an assault, cuffs should only be used where the arresting officer has objective grounds for their use. In this case he is under no threat and the person being arrested has shown no indication they are likely to be a threat. No law has been broken so an arrest had no basis either, there was nothing handled correctly by the officer in this interaction.
@@schrodingerscat1863 agreed , it was a battery ,, PC needs 2 elements for lawful arrest,, both elements HAVE to be met then there is the "necessity criteria" 1 element is missing = "objective basis" = grounds before geetting to the "necessity criteria",, and yes PC needs "reflective practice" ASAP,, good to read your message has "common sense" all the best ,🙏
Unfit to be officers 👮♀️
I would still take court action against him for the false arrest . He needs to learn the law before he goes around arresting members of the public.
Needs to learn lots of laws. Mad how police are employed to uphold laws which they know very little/nothing about
Dont need to show details he isn't doing nothing so get back in ure van ya fuckin scumbags.
Yeah thanks for that.....
Absolutely.
Worth adding that the one who arrested you at no time whatsoever informed you that he was filming, but when you were talking about the other ones after your release, he inferred that he was also recording...interesting
They claim that you're not detained, then later handcuff you, such consistency.
I am truly shocked at the appearance and demeanor of these officers. The PCSO was hopeless and made me cringe with embarrassment for him. The constable can only be described as slovenly in both his appearance and the way he dealt with you. He had his hands in his pockets while he spoke to you and completely lacked gravitas. The sergeant was just as woeful and seemed out of his depth over such a trifling matter. The whole interaction was pitiful. Is this really what the police force has turned into? Laurel and Hardy more like.
No accountability. No consquences. Weak leadership. Make a complaint and they move heaven and earth to protect their colleagues- all at the tax payers expense
Sargent
This is the weirdest arrest I've ever seen, complete amateur, unbelievable.
This is what you get when the police recruit illiterate ethnic immigrants, otherwise known as ‘box tickers’ into the Civil police.
uniform??
PC_amjad__Ditta, Yorkshire POL!CEman in Court soon
@@benlotus2703 its not him is it?
@@freqeist Diane Abbott=James Abbott-Thompson, 28, was arrested on Friday afternoon last week after police were called to the Foreign Office in Westminster, .
He was later charged with two counts of assault by beating an emergency services worker and a public order offence.
@@cedenullis5906 That's what you snowflakes want,Always ranting on about racism,Well put a few immigrants in the police to balance things up and now you snowflakes don't like it,You want better calibre people well not for £20,000+ you won't
The change in demeanor of the officer, towards the end, changed dramatically...he got told to back-off...:)
Why no signs to pre-warn of road closure
Jobsworths in the high vis likes the feeling of power that he can turn people around
These incompetent bullies are out of control. Disgusting use of the law.
What a despicable set of officers, other than the PCSO, who was polite, but clueless. The first officer was an utter ignoramus and hostile. Adam the sergeant was completely clueless of the law and legislation, and incapable of making his request clear, resulting in miscommunication and an unwarranted arrest. They made the Keystone cops look good.
Half way through and lady arrives to be warned by copper that your recording her but fails to mention that the police are also recording her.🙄
Adam: "I ent got no issues wiv dat."
Narrator: "Adam absolutely did have a yuuuuge issue wiv dat."
That officer’s feelings were hurt because the auditor knew more about the law than he did and made him look foolish.
This is why they don't attend burglaries any more, pissing about wasting time bothering this bloke
Press charges for assault and battery and false imprisonment . Disgusting actions by the officer
@@AshMan-wn8fs is dj audits a registered business and held to them them regulations ? Is the footage from the drone for commercial purposes ?
@Tom Foster dj doesn’t have to accept their offer , and if won at court ( yes more time consuming and difficult ) but a lot higher reward and result .
England’s finest , congratulations Cressida , you must be proud of these muppets.
This is the one though, if you are paid by Google for the videos, technically it's a business which you need to declare to the HMRC. I imagine it's just a waiting game for them till they catch up in January for no filing of accounts.
@@AshMan-wn8fs so your assuming that dj earns a revenue from the video upload , not sure of anyone else’s but I have never seen an ad with djs videos . Might be nice to hear from dj if he does earn a revenue but I’m of the inclination he doesn’t .
This is what happens when you box tick. Calling a member of the public 'man'.
Rice v. Connolly is an English legal precedent holding that there is no strict, general legal duty to assist a police officer prior to any possible arrest or caution, with even basic police enquiries nor to accompany the officer to a requested location
If I was fleeing a crime scene I'd choose Adam to chase after me.
Lol x
😂😂😂
being arrested is unlawful if you havnt done anything wrong
Don't worry, the police are very good at thinking stuff up, they're sure to find something.
PACE section 24(5)(a) gives the Police powers to arrest a person to obtain their details, or to confirm the correct details have been given.
However, PACE 24(5)(a) is presupposed on PACE 24(1), 24(2), 24(3) and 24(4) which states that 24(5)(a) can only be used for an arrest if there a pre-existing reasonable suspicion that a person has, or is about to commit an office, e.g., the Officer suspects the person has committed theft, and wishes to obtain the person's details to determine if they are the person wanted for theft.
The summary of this, is that it is only lawful to carry out an arrest to obtain details if there is an existing suspicion of an offence; however, refusing to give details in itself is not a valid premise to carry out an arrest to obtain details. Therefore, the arrest was presupposed on a false premise, which means the Officers carried out unlawful imprisonment and assault under Section 39 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988.
Further, every court in the land has agreed that refusing to give details when not legally required to cannot be used as a premise for reasonable suspicion as a consequence of Rice v Connolly 1966; which, states that a person is not obliged to talk to the Police, or remain with the Police unless arrested. RVC1966 means that if the Police talk to you, you are free to walk away unless detained or arrested.
In conclusion, unless you are arrested, you are not obliged to answer any questions from the Police. And, invoking the right not to answer questions cannot be used as a premise to suspect that person has or is about to commit an offence.
@@martinsanders6124 good info thank you
@@townseydroidborleyboy8024 👍
The filth do this on a daily basis
I carry my operator ID on my RC as well as the drone, I am fully aware that I don't have to do this but in honesty it saves all the farting around!
He couldn't wait to put the cuff on ,mommy mommy I did it I did it I used my bracelets I mean handcuffs.. Priceless
Thanks to DJ and AB I was able to hold my own last night against 2 officers who wanted to stitch me up by "helping me" 👍
That's so nice to hear. Well done Winston. 👍
AB seems extremely passive aggressive towards immigrants.
@@DJAUDITStwo years ago I'm commenting on your videos..I said to you a year ago, that I've been following u since you STARTED ,your response was kind of like yea yea I'm sure, as maybe everyone tells u this..but I remember the very first week you came on here,I remember because of your tbh, jobsworth nature 😂 I remember watching u moaning for 20 mins to some police receptionist about the disabled chord in the toilets didn't reach the floor and went into all the legal and moral ramifications of such. I'm pretty sure u didnt do keyrings either.anyway I've just liked my 2 comments which u also liked , so u can see I wasnt just saying bs to appease the creator like some fanboy. I used to watch lots of audits once , my favourite as told u before being live free (Chris) I really miss his posts, I used to attend his lives online and spent 24hrs with him once when he went homeless in Birmingham (I think, could have been London) and the police gave him hassle. He travelled down there by getting a lift in the back of some random guys van. He was very much appreciative of having real members of the public along with him keeping a eye as it were and company. It was a great live and the amount of hassle, fun and good things were done..I was on live with him when he went to Wales to fight old matey which is what finished his channel and got him put in prison. I'd been on must have been over a hundred lives and u do get to become quite a part of what's going on as he obviously interacted with the viewers. Anyway , now I only watch you, dje and ab..that's it..keep up the good work..til the next comment.
😉😉😉
@@DJAUDITSoh and just having read that back - when I said about the toilets and the disabled chord I'm sure that wasn't at the start of your venture here but was just saying it's one I remember that gives a example of your approach and the reason I remember your channel differentiate from say someone else's. I'm not sure I've always had this picture on the left because a few year ago I had another channel , still sol-cutta but that one got wiped from CZcams and I started this one. Anyway til next time...😏😉
I can not believe what's gone on DJ... Hope your safe and well matey.. Hope you will be making a complaint
Over the years I have known about half a dozen who joined the police. In every case becoming a PC exacerbated the worst elements of their characters. One female in particular used her position to order everyone around. She clearly assumed that her opinions had the force of law. When she tried that on me I used a basic Anglo-Saxon expression which clearly she did not expect. Then she threatened to arrest me! I told her that I would defend myself against any attempt by her to assault me.
Let’s us know how the assault claim goes.
This is why police should be held accountable for high standards, the pc was trying to intimidate you. Abuse of power
They are scum
There was nothing unreasonable about what the officer was asking. The guy was stand offish and obnoxious with him which made him react. Nothing about this is 'dangerous' or an abuse of power, it's just complaining at police for the sake of it. This is the problem with this whole anti-police movement in the UK. If you want to see real abuses of power maybe you should move to the US. Then you'd be grateful for our decidedly reasonable (on the whole) police force.
And sadly he was intimidated and caved.
@@notrecyborg5492 it doesnt matter if "The guy was stand offish and obnoxious".......... Police should be calm polite and respectful in their demeanour its in there own code of Practice:..
2.1
According to this standard you must:
• carry out your role and responsibilities in an
efficient, diligent and professional manner
• avoid any behaviour that might impair your
effectiveness or damage either your own
reputation or that of policing
• ensure your behaviour and language
could not reasonably be perceived to be
abusive, oppressive, harassing, bullying,
victimising or offensive by the public or
your policing colleagues.
Examples of meeting this standard are
when you:
• remain composed and respectful, even in
the face of provocation
• retain proportionate self-restraint in
volatile situations
• recognise the particular needs of victims
and witnesses for policing support
• step forward and take control when
required by the circumstances
• keep an open mind and do not prejudge
situations or individuals
• use your authority only in ways that
are proportionate, lawful, accountable,
necessary and ethical
I would like you to clarify your allegation?
Well handled DJ, as per usual the police want to Gas Light.
The Sargent didn't inform you if he was recording.
Terrible handling of the situation.
I hope you take it further and I wish you success.
How the fu** is he a Sgt!!!
Jesus christ ...... the PCSO handled the situation better than the alleged sergeant. This video is anprime example of where public money is being set on fire
Yeh and he was an absolute bumbling weapon. Atleast he was loveable in his idiocy though.
I find it hard to think there is anyone that would look at the behaviour of those two fools and support them. The real problem is they are as thick a brick with little education or insight into how to treat people. Your knowledgeable and pleasant but firm approach they should consider and learn from. I hope you make a complaint to the CS.
What a waste of time. These police have nothing else to do then arrest a man with a toy.
@inowiamgoodlooking10 They were probably bored with scanning Facebook accounts looking for non crime hate comments.
The funny bit is she is actually assuming the role of the police telling the cyclist she cant go that way hahaha
if that was me , i would get very annoyed with the police , they would then get more aggresive with me , i in return would get more aggresive , i have no doubt in my mind the police would escalate the situation to such a degree that i would be arrested for my responce . what a total discrace the police is !!!!!!!! i do not feel as safe as i once did !!!!! omg
Police attend, don't know the law, they get educated, they try to provoke a physical response from a member of the public through wrongful arrest.
Here in America, interfering with a drone pilot while drone is in the air, is a federal crime just like interfering with an airplane pilot.
@@davidkn Incorrect, he was approached by a Police officer who started questioning him despite him saying that he's busy and the drone was in the air. The police are fault here but nice try Officer Knight!
@@davidkn If the police approached him, they took his attention away from flying. That should be the crime.
policing has certainly changed, my old man was a sergeant and if he'd have turned up the copper would have been told to do some proper policework and the PCSO told to make some tea. Tragic
All cops are pigs simple
@@cowardsallaround98 Real school policing died out in years early 90's. It's all about meeting a quota system now and the softly softly approach.
@@cowardsallaround98 Back in 08, Swindon police force, sorry service labeled it 'positive discrimination' when recruiting but wanting ethnic minorities to add to the diversity of local communities.
@@cowardsallaround98 Denial: the action of denying something.
Why is an invader in a position of authority. It feels insulting.
Should and must verbally tell is two different things
What a dirty way to get someone's id when they know you don't have to give it corrupt cops
Are we going to see more apologies issued by the head of policing for the area...this is becoming a regular thing at the moment.
Police are making more and more mistakes and it is time they were brought to task.
Don't tell them your name Pike!
Im not sure why so many people agree with this arrogant person , kinda funny how all of his videos have these confrontations, nosey arrogant and up his own arse.
Well said it's because the content is different and a lot of people just hate people (especially police officers) but forget that police are ultimately there to protect people as they would get a different job. The pay is awful for what they do.
The reason I like the content as I do find it interesting how certain people react to what he is doing. The channel isn't truly about the footage it's now about the drama.
People agree because the guy is right. The Police should know the Law FFS! Arresting him was a pathetic and desperate act by a total idiot who was shown up for the tosser he clearly is. Most folk consider the police to be a bunch of preening narcissists who are only interested in an easy life.
I like this guy because I don't believe anything the police say. I have had the police try and charge me for a complete lie and had to find my own witnesses to prove that it was all lies. They did nothing to help.
These cops waste ages with this useless activity. We are paying for them. When my house was broken into they did absolutely nothing.
Plonkers
ALL CRIMINALS MUST BE BOUGHT TO JUSTICE NO MATTER WHAT UNIFORM OR BADGE THEY WEAR. Because of their incompetence these uneducated officers arrested a man for no crime or offence of any kind. The ONLY way these officers will learn is as a defendant in court. Please.
The arrest was presupposed on a false premise, i.e., unlawful. Which means the Officers are guilty of false imprisonment and assault under Section 30 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988.
Whether they will be arrested and charged with these criminal offences is another matter.
@@juliandavies1974 Firstly, who is Banaman?
Secondly, provided details when legally obliged to is what you, and everyone is supposed to do. He only declines to oblige the request when not legally obliged to.
@@juliandavies1974 Because Rice v Connolly 1966 means that citizens are free to go about their lawful business in public without fear of interference from the government in regards to who they are, or who they are associating with. RvC1966 means the Police cannot oblige you to provide your details unless you are arrested for an offence.
Even PACE Section 24(5)(a) requires the presupposition of an offence, i.e., that a person has or is about to commit an offence, in order for the Police to arrest you to obtain your details as part of an investigation.
This is tyranny: the government has powers to stop you and demand your details without a valid premise, i.e., suspicion of an offence.
This is NOT tyranny: the government has no powers to stop you and demand your details without a valid premise, i.e., suspicion of an offence.
@@juliandavies1974 That's right. I've been watching audit videos for several years, heck i've been tempted to make my own, but i've never heard of anyone, in any auditing video, referred to as Bananaman.
Could I prevail upon your good favour to elucidate further on who Bananaman is?
@@juliandavies1974 Oh that.
You need to sue that cop
This is what comes when you do away with the Police Training Centre’s we had years ago, you end up with university numpties.
You are under no obligation to help the police before or after an arrest. Rice v. Connolly (1966) is an English legal precedent holding that there is no strict, general legal duty to assist a police officer prior to any possible arrest or caution, with even basic police enquiries nor to accompany the officer to a requested location. Never talk to them
How he is a Sargent, just shows the state of the police. They are really scraping the barrel these days
It’s worse than just scraping the barrel because at one stage the sergeant did say he’s free to go.
So if he was free to go then how suddenly has he got arrested when he could’ve left a long time ago ?
The sergeant just changed his mind to suit himself right ?
The “ Barrel of cowardice “
Right colour
@@junelawson5100 racist b*tch they don't pick based on colour, shows you are a moron with a sad comment like that.
This country has got a knack of making you pay out money no matter what your involved with .
Adam would like you to write down very slowly all what has been said so that he can understand it.
The intellectual limitations of that officer were painfully apparent, once he felt intellectually challenged he felt literally threatened
It’s all Ego- I live in Miami Beach, and this looks just the same as their reaction to almost all interactions with the public… 99% of police do not understand they are public servants
How did he pass his sergeants course, positive discrimination?
@@stevennpitt They aren't anymore. They are government owened corporate enforcers. Nothing more nothing less.
Love how rattled he was getting. The arrest was done in a way (quickly grabbing your wrist and cuffing you) where he wanted you to instinctively react by either assaulting him or resisting. Fair play because you did neither.
The only downside is the arrest rattled you enough to show your ID.
The policeman wasn't rattled at all. In fact things could have gone really badly with the attitude shown by DJ audit. He was lucky imho not to be detained for harassment or impeding an officer
@@mymobile5014 Harassment? 😅🤣😂 Clearly you're one of the gang. DJ Audit done a great job of proving how little the police actually know about the law.
He did a great job of being annoying and irritating and obstructive. A much better auditor would have simply and easily showed how incompetent the cops were. Sadly he just made himself look like the end of the bell. @@gibbs677bg
@mymobile5014 what force you work for baconboy?
@@mymobile5014That’s the dumbest comment on this video. Well done. 😂
Am I right in thinking he could’ve just got your details from the operator ID? Seems like he wanted to make a scene.
Gosh, this man is a supervisor also. What an absolute mess. Total shambles. No faith in these people, whatsoever. Total embarrassment to this country.