The UFO Movie THEY Don't Want You to See (2023)
Vložit
- čas přidán 2. 08. 2024
- FULL MOVIE
Movie website - theufo.movie
WINNER, BEST DOCUMENTARY - GeekFestToronto, 2024
WINNER, BEST DOCUMENTARY - Brooklyn SciFi Film Festival, 2023
WINNER, BEST DIRECTOR - L.A. Sci-Fi & Horror Festival, 2023
FINALIST - Raw Science Film Festival, 2023
FINALIST - Galactic Imaginarium Film Festival, 2023
HONORABLE MENTION - Athens International Monthly Art Film Festival, 2024
SEMI-FINALIST - White Vulture Film Festival, 2023
"Who are THEY?" is answered on the movie's FAQ page: www.briandunning.com/ufo/faq.php
"The UFO Movie THEY Don't Want You to See" is a feature-length indie documentary film produced by Brian Dunning. In an age when misinformation, alternative facts, and conspiracy theories have become mainstream, UFOs have risen to become one of the most-talked about pop culture phenomena. With all of this noise, how can we expect anyone to know how much of this is true? What is in our skies? What do we know, and how do we know it? And most importantly: Are we being visited?
Science does have most of these answers, and we're working on answering the rest of them. The film features experts in:
• Physics & relativity
• Exobiology
• Exoplanetary spectral analysis
• Image analysis
• Pilot training and air traffic control
• Defense
"The UFO Movie THEY Don't Want You to See" lays out for you exactly what we know and how we know it.
Follow it up with The SETI Institute's Q&A on the film: • SETI Institute Q&A on ...
Get the hoodie! skeptoid.org/store/merch.php
Marketing assets and more information available on the film's website at theufo.movie
For more info, contact brian@briandunning.com
CHAPTERS
00:00:00 Introduction
00:04:55 Who is out there?
00:09:27 Would they be interested in us?
00:12:09 Faster than light travel
00:15:35 The Christmas tree problem
00:17:32 Can aliens skirt physics?
00:21:06 A high bar for evidence
00:24:45 Solved UFO cases
00:29:31 Examining the evidence
00:30:11 Rendlesham Forest
00:33:52 The Ariel School
00:37:39 1967 Malmstrom AFB
00:46:36 The Jimmy Carter UFO
00:54:22 Navy UFO videos
01:15:44 Secret military aircraft
01:19:22 Who are the best experts?
01:25:06 Where will we find them? - Věda a technologie
What we also learned here is the one of the lowest bars for intelligence and critical thinking is the United States Congress.
Which was a big surprise...
@@mikloskallo9046 i was shocked, lol.
Who rounded up the usual suspects
I know and how sad is that? It's downright embarrassing.
I can see why this is in the "science fiction" category. This garbage production says nothing authoritative, whatsoever. Astronaut Gordon Cooper, Capt. Robert O. Dean, Dr. Steven Greer, Pilot John Lear, Astronaut Edgar Mitchell, and hundreds of other truthful witnesses are the men you should listen to. "The Disclosure Project" is another good source. And this clown Dunning picks apart a fake"UFO" film put out by the government, (the tic tac) that most know it was fake, but presented on the news as if it were real. Calling a fake film fake is not much to be proud of.
I think the most revealing thing about this video is the ATC saying pilots report wrong altitude all the time...That's something I don't want to hear.
My reply to this ... honest report!:
So everybody is simply wrong and are making hundreds if not thousands of observational mistakes including trained veterans and professionals from the domestic airline sector and air forces ect all around the world, and none of our world leaders and politicians would lie to us? Thank you for clearing that up for me!
Pilots very rarely report altitude verbally...on board transponder does it electronically.
🤔If any one, we should be believing our pilots because they know they see what’s in the sky almost on a daily basis they are trained to tell the difference like that’s when I started to believe is when I heard a few pilots come forward..Smh
Right
@@sqengineer I don't think that's 100% of the time. I've heard ATC transmissions whereby the controller asks the pilot "what is your current altitude?" Maybe it's a cross-check by the controller to match the transponder's number with the pilot's altimeter?
We did not invent mathematics, we merely discovered it...
"We" don't have a clue about the laws of physics!
I think military reports of these things turning at right angles while doing incredible speeds should be a hint we don't know everything. I've got a feeling these things are terrestrial though. Our oceans and the moon would have to be possibilities.
@@SCHEY101 That is a hint that it is not a craft of any sort. The inhabitants would be paste. And the craft probably broken up.
@@retheadeetlefs2793 there is a hint that, some civilization with 1000+ yo science has understood and is able to control gravity, unlike humans, which have 100 yo modern science, but still we can understand how to do it, since it is physical reality. according to 100yo physics, when bending space around a ship, the ship does not need to move move, in order to go from A to B, its space around it that is "pulled" towards the ship, B is moved to A, so the ships starts and arrives at the same time. thus the occupants do not have any acceleration, they just see space coming towards them, thus feeling 0 movement, or passage of time, when going from one end of the universe to the other. Einstein predicted this and everything Einstein predicted has been proved a reality sooner or later
What you meant to say was I don't have a clue about the laws of physics!
@@bamskills2649 he correctly meant humans, we actually call quantum entanglement SPOOKY ACTION. our best scientists do not understand the basics of the ultimate workings of our reality, anyone who is not a scientist, in their ignorance of what they ignore, usually thinks we do, for a civilization even 1000 years in our future, which should have have complete grasp of reality and the advanced engineering, their tech would look Godly to us primates
If there really is something out there waiting for us in the darkness, then we'd damn well better hope that it's not like us at all. Knowing the bloody career of human history as I do.
I'm pretty sure the "like us" have already destroyed themselves hundreds, if not thousands, of times over. Like we are literally about to do...
I agree with your thoughts, our species has a very long history of evil deeds, and it hasn't stopped yet. we are not and may never be ready for a real first contact with aliens from another world. yes, the worse part, they might be too much like us.
My reply to this ... honest report!:
So everybody is simply wrong and are making hundreds if not thousands of observational mistakes including trained veterans and professionals from the domestic airline sector and air forces ect all around the world, and none of our world leaders and politicians would lie to us? Thank you for clearing that up for me!
UFO's are everywhere, this is a full blown invasion, we need to hide and run, it's over man, it's over!
the egg-heads in this movie said, it's not possible to travel faster than light, but the experts said the same thing about flying, even at the seed of sound, going to the moon and so forth.
INTELLIGENT life on Earth is debatable.
Wales and dolphins?
indeed
we have plenty of stupidity going around
but then again the universe is full of electrons protons neutrons and morons
@@walkertongdee Whales
Aliens judge us by Trump and his Maga followers.
@@poloramon8130 🤡🤡
Didn't the US navy have radar data on the alleged UAP's which backed up the pilots accounts ?
Most don't report to not lose their jobs. But there ARE SEVERAL accounts.
Even if it is a UAP doesn’t mean it comes from another planet. Just because we can’t identify something in the sky that shouldn’t be our bar for something being extraterrestrial or alien. I keep waiting and watching for irrefutable proof of the existence of aliens but so far, absolutely nothing. I truly want to believe.
The accounts by the pilots were disputed.
One of the major problems is that these weapons systems were designed to target enemy aircraft and not ET.
And during this time the Airforce failed to recognize simple Chinese weather balloons flying across our country.
Birds, a balloon and fighter drone targets are a more reasonable explanation to these mistaken non identifications.
I am a firm believer that these craft we are seeing are black op programs run by our own government.
And in that case I feel as though they like it when you call it other worldly.
Keep thinking its a spaceship guys!
Yes ! This dude is lying 🤥
I thought men came and erased the data… I may be wrong. But from my understanding, especially for military personnel, they’re told to keep quiet or things may happen. They lose their pilot license, possibly careers, etc.
This feels like it's endorsed and funded by AARO.
@briandunning 1) Why did you not mention the Navy pilots who saw/followed the UAPs and the corroborative radar reports from the ships including the target traveling 60 miles in one second? 2) Why did you not mention the Phoenix Lights which had thousands of observers and some with videos? 3) Why did you not mention the Stephenville Lights seen by many? etc etc I appreciated the Carter Sighting explained (although still confused as to why we put a barium cloud into the atmosphere). I believe you cherry-picked UAP events that fit your preconceived belief system.
Your comment made me decide not to bother watching this Crap!!! Thank you!! ❤🏃♀️🏃♀️🙋♀️🇬🇧
The Phoenix lights have been explained. Check Wikipedia, or listen to Brian’s own podcast where he covers the Phoenix lights.
He could have covered a lot of other topics/events, sure, but when you have a specific budget and only so much time, you cover what you can.
@@Graeck -- Nope, Phoenix lights have not been explained away. Just all sorts of typical BS like flares etc. All just crap.
Because his whole channel and agenda is all about debunking so yeah, he's going to be cherry-picking alright.
Just like you cherry-picked your list of UFO incidents. Instead of attacking someone who came up with some interesting comments and took the time to create a program about a subject we all care about. Why not give your constructive criticism and still support an attempt to get clarity on this topic?
I like the Stephensville siting and I find Steve Allen very credible. But the craft might have been ours and that's OK too.
The Navy pilots may have been wrong. Their craft is not optimized for UFO hunting. And if the Government is not seeking answers maybe that is because it is secret and the technology belongs to us!
Radar on the Princetown tracked what Mick West said in your show was a weather balloon travelling from 80,000 ft to sea-level in under 1 second, which is at least Mach 26. Please can Mick tell us where to purchase a latex balloon with this capability?
They were once sold at Toys r US, however, I currently have no information regarding existing vendors.
Mick has some really weird personal issue with this subject. It's absurd. He's just a buffoon at this point
_"Radar on the Princetown ... 80,000 ft to sea-level in under 1 second ..."_
Any evidence for that other than eye witness accounts?
Or the other way around: If so, have other possibilities been investigated that could also explain such an observation? Sources? What points to extraterrestrials? You can't always blame some kind of "supernatural" beings for everything you can't explain, even if we've always done so in the past. Only the "beings" have always changed in history.
And why did these tic tac objects move so fast w/o reasons or why did they not move away before the jets arrived? Do they want to be discovered? And if yes why did the flew after. Questions over questions. That all is not plausible if you think rational about it.
And: "What else could it have been?" is not a valid counter-question for a good reason. Most of this kind of discussions is based on wishful thinking and a cult especially in the US.
Well, Mick West is an idiot so there's that.
Mick doesn't have any weird personal issues, it's just that he has taken up the mantle of being a state sponsored debunker , he is the heir to Philip Klass, Donald Menzel and Dr Condon. These government paid debunkers have no credibility with the public.@@bristlefist
His lead scientist’s answer was “NO. Not possible!” 😂
I think this documentary may have an agenda… And it may be brought to you by the people of Philip Morris 😜
The agenda is that "alien aircraft" is an extraordinary explanation and the reasons for that explanation being extraordinary are discussed in the video. But nowhere does the author say that it is "impossible".
So lucky THEY allowed you to upload the movie and let it online tho they don't want me to see it!
How dare you introduce logic and common sense. To be fair, though, they cover most of the basic facts for people unfamiliar with the subject. As for the clickbait, it's Standard Operating Procedure on CZcams now. Even reputable channels go with Alarming! Terrifying! Frightening! I think Terrifying! is the most popular. 🤪🤪
Being a witness to The Phoenix Lights, how do you explain an object the size of many football fields being viewed by over 10,000 people. This object was tracked on radar from northern to southern Arizona, and clearly not something that was man made. When passing over the mountains near my house, it was only hundreds of feet in the air, and it's massive triangular shape clearly visible blocking out the stars in that evenings clear sky. To date, I have never heard any rational explanation.
That must have been some experience for you, this guy is a debunker or maybe a man in black lol, why do the US gov want to hide the truth, maybe afraid of chaos occuring, which is plausible i suppose,
I remember this on the news. I was living in Sedona at the time. Several friends were driving back from here and saw it but honestly didn’t think it was ET but us, our military tryin an experiment for ‘reactions’ of the public. Empaths are real, so I agreed with him, as a fellow empath. Seeing fox10 interview a ten yr old boy and his father and the boy was Crystal clear in his statement of what they witnessed. I believed the boy then and still do. It was our dufus guys ‘let’s test their reaction’ flyin it. For males it’s your gut that speaks truth to you, men heed it, women heed it-intuition, but it’s more than that and gets stronger with each use! ET’S carry a different energy than humans, and at 68 I’ve had some experiences not to be explained, so I know the difference. Our guys will be flyin re-engineered ‘ufo’ type ships when the big reveal occurs. It’ll be a show trust me, half of it bs buncha clown acts. You’ll see. Get your cameras ready. 🙏🏻🤔😂
His reply will be "You where just brainwashed by Hollywood movies (and his peers of course), so your subconscious made you see and think that, a visual trick of your subconscious... what in reality was comets dust or some other BS official narrative.
That dude makes me vomit.
Don't lose your faith in what you know to be a real experience. It's healthy to question things. For example I have no clue who you are or where, but I know you are real because of your comment on this page. Stay curioua. 🌌🤔 🥀
"He was at an event called the "Halloween Balloon Spooktacular" in which a skydiving team called the Arizona Skyhawks jumped out of a plane with bright magnesium flares for a show. "I was at the location where those skydivers were coming in Friday night," Crabbs stated in a Fox10 news report, "That's exactly what happened: there were some skydivers. And they did have pyrotechnics on their ankles. There were four of them, and if you look at the video, you can see actually four different lights."
Much of the area surrounding Horizon High School is open space that would be ideal for skydiving. But why weren't the lights identified earlier?
The answer is that though the event (held at a place called Salt River Fields) is about 15 miles from the high school, it is difficult to judge the distance of unknown objects in the sky -- and that's especially true for the night sky. Under clear conditions, bright lights can be seen for dozens of miles; some lighthouses can be seen more than fifty miles away, for example."
Shows like this really piss me off. "There is nothing that can break the laws of physics!" Yup just like the world is the center of the universe, the world is flat or the sound barrier can not be broken. Science is all about learning what we thought was truth only to learn it is not. To have the closed mind and say we will not able to go faster then the speed of light or not being able to find some way to travel light years, that person is an idiot.
So "that person is an idiot," huh? Exactly what have you done to prove them idiotic? Please share your knowledge with the world.
@@checkmateking235 History itself has proven it. The point he's making is, 'scientists' say 'such and such is impossible', which only means it hasn't been done yet.
'Scientists' didn't think creatures could could live in subzero temps, crushing water depths, but yet there they are, 20k feet down and flourishing.
They seem to think that 'because we don't know how to do it here, then it can't be done ANYWHERE'. Most scientists are closed minded. Everything's impossible until it isn't.
Even if we give them the benefit of the doubt that they're not idiots, if they've convinced themselves (or been convinced by someone else) that something is not possible, it seems we are plausibly able to reasonably say that THEY will likely not be the ones to discover that it IS possible if it actually is.
The only issues that can “break“ any law of physics is out “lack of knowledge“ about what those “laws“ are! THINK! 🤔😮
Correction: our lack.....
What he doesn't talk about with the tic-tac video from the aircraft carrier nemesis, the Nemesis had these objects on radar. He himself is not telling the hole story. The pilot himself testified before Congress, radar itself showed the object disappeared and seconds later reappear 60 miles away. Funny how he doesn't talk about that.
Yes I don’t buy the videos but I do buy what the pilots said they saw - there is REAL EVIDENCE that authorities have worked hard to cover up this phenomenon for years - I actually believe they have released videos that can obviously be disproven to distract the people from wanting answers - a mistake unscientific and selective video designed by scientists and others on the basis “ it can’t be therefore it isn’t “
It's the Nimitz
"But Captain, I canna change the laws a-physics"
Wins the Internet today .
Hard to believe it's been almost three and a half years since I hit the FAA's mandatory retirement age from Continental/United. My final position was 777 Captain. In all that time I saw some spectacular sights. Everything from flying between columns of thunderstorms that made you feel like a small bird navigating thru a Redwood forest, to being lit up, instantaneously, as if by the sun, in the middle of the night, by a way to curious meteor. But I never saw anything I couldn't explain.
I was just a person with my wife in wrong place at the wrong time going home from our friends house in the early hours who lived n a rural area when it seen us chased us stopped our vehicle it hovered just ft above the roof our car rotating before eventually ascending from just above the field to the high up through the clouds.Yes we have a alien intelligence here on the Earth and its very sad not many people know about this.Did i report it .oh yes to the Miniistry of Defence in 2005
Enjoy your retirement Captain! Thanks for all those years of taking us earth bound clods into the skies. All the Best to you.. 😜
@@stemtostern7611 Thank you very much, I appreciate it.
@@liamstrauss5477 That had to have be a life altering experience.
@@liamstrauss5477Where did this happen?
Just because we can't travel many light years to other stars does not mean they haven't discovered how to do it!
They love saying that crap. Like aliens would be so different from us and not shaped like us, while at the same time saying they'd not be able to figure out things we haven't yet like ok so they look nothing like us which ok that's reasonable to assume I guess but they would have an identical level of intelligence and space traveling technology to us? And we know everything so they can't make it here full stop...? You want your cake and you demand to eat it too? You can't have both of these things and expect to have a good case against aliens existing and having an ability to travel here it comes off desperate and condescending
Right. An so all the alien accounts an crafts prier to now, has never existed because there's no proof or no more then just one person has claimed to see these things
Exactly..... Since we can't do it, then no one else can? Sounds kind of naive to me.
@@sgrimm7346 Based on the current understanding of physics, it's impossible. That is not being naive. Jumping to unfounded conclusions is naive in my understanding.
@@daftdog exactly. People who claim 'someone else might be able to do it', simply do not understand what the speed of light actually is.
13:40 "is it possible that some aliens might come to us from a different part of the universe that might have different laws of physics?" Her immediate unblinking answer "NO. It is not possible. The laws of physics are the same everywhere."
One thing I've learned in my 50 years of being a live human being: whenever someone says that something is impossible all they have to do is wait for a while and they will be proven wrong every time, without exception.
Even with our perceived vast amount of knowledge I fear the human race is blinkered and it's going to take a very long time to find other ways to our condition of omniscience without e.t. coming down and saying, " here's how it's done". Then watch the academics make up plausible reasons as to why they thought they were correct in being incorrect.
A dream is just a discovery away.
The impossible is the the possible that we haven't fathomed yet.
While this idea might seem somewhat valid in broad terms, there is absolutely no basis to entertain the idea that the established laws of physics would vary in other regions of the universe outside of the realm of science fiction. In fact, if you're even willing to entertain this notion, it indicates a lack of fundamental understanding of the universal laws of physics.
How long until 2 + 2 = 5 then?
All of the scientist in this film are so sure of themselves. No scientist I’ve ever respected has been so certain.. About anything!
“Brought to you by the people of Phillip Morris” 😜
Yeah, I agree with your statement. Countless times scientists have been incorrect. However, that doesn't necessarily make these videos legit.
There are plenty of cases that are supported by radar data corroborating eyewitness stories, but this program completely ignored them. The Tic Tac UFO descended from 80,000 feet to the surface of the ocean in a second. Further, it took off at extremely fast speed that US F/A-18 pilots said was too fast for any person to survive, and it went to a location where these pilots were supposed to go for a dogfight in a matter of a second (not to mention that the dogfight location was a secret). There is proof, you just have to look.
one thing about time and distance that is often overlooked is that we always limit any extraterrestrial life form to a lifespan similar to our own even though we are aware of living things on Earth with lifespans far greater than ours.
if an extraterrestrial species had lifespans lasting 10's of 1000's of years, or longer, they might not mind spending a few hundred years crossing interstellar space
Consider a super intelligent alien species that is 50,000 years+ more advanced than us, they would travel through space/time in ways we couldn't possibly understand.
We don't have an understanding of true nature of reality, we might have a tiny glimpse but our brains are simply not evolved enough to grasp the full scope of reality, so we can't even understand all the possibilities of space/time manipulation.
Bottom line - a sufficiently advanced alien civilization would have ways of traveling that are beyond our understanding.
All the variables makes the brain tingle!!!
Valid point.
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
-Arthur C. Clarke@theseventhammer
@@theseventhammer could, not would
"laws of physics, as WE know it", WE have barely scratched the surface IMO.
Not according to what they learned by rote at university...nothig else is possible
Until we come to some new type of physics, we have to go with the physics as we understand them now.
@@ThatCanadianGuy-e1p "Physics as we know them now" says warp travel is possible.
@@ThatCanadianGuy-e1p:
No.
You DON'T "have to".
@@142horizon Yes you do, otherwise we're just in fairy land.
"UFO The Movie You Don't Want To See" 👽🌌
This movie follows the typical debunker formula.
Ya, got CIA written all over it.
Mick West is his daddy.
On the Rendelsham Forest case how does the Offord Ness Lighthouse beacon light get viewed 6 miles inland when the lighthouse has an opaque backing screen preventing inland ingress of the light ?
And not seen each night if it was it at that location? I agree with you and some other documentary showed that it couldn't be the lighthouse.
@@kenblack4802 Great point. Lighthouse wasn’t put up just the day before. Assistant base commander would have previously been aware of the lighthouse.
Lighthouse do not have opaque backing. they emit light in 360 degrees to ensure the light can be seen from any angle the ship may be approaching. You can google this.
@@hootonhoot It seems to me that the light from the lighthouse may not usually be visible through the forest but was in this instance possibly due to the time of year when there are no leaves on the trees it was visible. The five second flash coincided with the flash interval of the lighthouse light. Other folks may have seen the flashes in the past but recognized they were from the lighthouse and obviously would not have reported it.
ships don't have wheels and do not approach overland. I don't know the exact situation with this lighthouse but for me it makes perfect sense to block the light on the landside if the lighthouse is not on an island. It would surely drive me crazy if my bedroom was lit up like a Christmas tree every 20 seconds@@tma-1704
In the missile silos, then no one noticed that the electricity is out?
And there was no way to find the guards who were on the ground at the time of the incident to tell if they saw anything?
ya i agree, I think this video did a great service to the community by partially debunking the claims made by Salas about Malmstrom
but i too felt that there are still some loose dangling ends to follow up on
didn't Salas claim that security guards on the surface were screaming on the phone the base was under attack? it makes me wonder if Salas was lying.
and/or if there is some way to find the guards and get them to talk about their side of things.
When he said it was a weather balloon I had a good laugh 😂
I don't CARE what anyone says about me.... I saw a space ship while I was on the USS PRESERVER ARS-8.
Do these guys really think that United States Navy aircraft carriers don’t have the radar capability to determine the speed and direction of an object for 100s of miles out on radar? Further - is that not the very information given to pilots to vector them into position to encounter these phenomena(as they testified to before Congress)? Are we also expected to believe that USN fighter pilots - graduates of Top Gun, cannot determine how fast an object is going in relation to their own aircraft…like they train for 100s of hours in dog fighting? That sets the bar for our fighter pilots and the Navy at a laughably low level. Just some food for thought on how little thought and effort was put into this analysis…The Navy has been using radar since WWII, they are not relying on IT guys to draw pretty lines on computers and say ‘watch your parallax and you will be ready to engage!’…Why? because they have RADAR - look up the meaning of the acronym and then tell us some more about ‘parallax’…
LOL! Dog Fighting? They are the one saying Dog Fighting is not a Thing anymore coz they can see each other miles away and can lunch missiles. And Radar don't justify if its a foreign objects not from earth, like the film said there are many factors in radars regarding the speed its not like two cars chasing each others.
@@pillow2kTop Gun is a real school in the Navy - and yes - they teach ONLY DOGFIGHTING. You may as well just rip that bandaid off right now. I would suggest you take my advice and review what the acronym RADAR means…If you think the Navy is sending up 30 million dollar planes without knowing where and how fast they are moving and how fast and in what direction other planes are going (basic air traffic control) well, bless your heart. Apparently these Navy pilots should consult you before trusting in the systems the Pentagon has spent billions on developing…the same systems you are giddy to point out that allow pilots to engage targets beyond visual range - magically stop working when pilots are in visual range...how convenient for your half baked analysis. The problem - That just isn't how radar works, both the jets AND the aircraft carriers can see an objects vector which is how the carrier was able to vector the jets from their scheduled training mission to the general position of the phenomena, allowing the jets to lock their camera on to the object...Hopefully the Chinese and Russian Navies have as low opinion of our sailors and hardware as you do if we ever have to go to war against them. On that point, I think we can agree...
Radar data is subject to the same interference and error, whether you're on a fishing boat or an aircraft carrier. And then it has to be observed by people, who aren't perfect.
@@WaxPaper That is a powerful rebuttal, "interference and error" - JUST SHOOT ME (the Navy and fighter jets are not running your uncle's fishing boat radar)...why don't you do YOUR service, let the entire Pacific fleet know about the loopholes in our defenses that this movie taught you about...RADAR is what surface warfare stakes thousands of sailors lives on (and by proxy millions of citizens lives). That is a FACT regardless of how you FEEL about the technology, it's limits or applications. It works seemlessly for every major international airport on the planet - but not here and with you . Stop making excuses for shitty agenda driven "science".
@@chriswb7 Light behaves the same way regardless of what it's bouncing off of, or what it's passing through. Military hardware might be prone to less errors, but it's still prone to errors.
The way this program is presented is with earthly human concepts and human way of thinking.
Yeah makes no sense and they have what 2 people saying these laws are laws anywhere in the galaxy
Why do you suppose that is? And who is expected to change this in breadth and scope?
@@kevinparrish6085 My reply to this ... honest report!:
So everybody is simply wrong and are making hundreds if not thousands of observational mistakes including trained veterans and professionals from the domestic airline sector and air forces ect all around the world, and none of our world leaders and politicians would lie to us? Thank you for clearing that up for me!
The 'human' way of thinking will never result in full disclosure and ET contact.
Well yes, after all they are humans... and rational evaluation of evidence is the best tool humans have to understand reality.
really, you discount the position/experience of a Top-Gun pilot, not to mention the ability of an F16's tracking systems to capture another plane to this guy ...your truly special...
why would you not believe a video game "expert" over a TOP GUN instructor, in identifying what's on a plane's instrument?? you must be biased and irrational :P
Hay! You stole my post!! lol
Yes, everyone can make mistakes and misinterpret what they see. Also, aliens should never ever be the go-to explanation for a UAP. Earth has many tricks up her sleeve. Ever heard of sprites? Look them up - colossal lightning very high up in the atmosphere. Bizarre things. We don't know our planet so we'll that it can't surprise us with strange and unknown or little understood phenomena - all endlessly more plausible than visits by aliens, as cool as they would be.
@@tamfuwing1 why should the most likely explanation be, not only "never be considered" but forbidden for science when proof is literally flying over our heads, all the time, according to the university of Kiev peer reviewed scientific papers. Not to mention hundreds of military and governmental insider witnesses. They are ALL collectively hallucinating? at some point we have to admit people have been brainwashed to dismiss reality, and prefer to live in denial, in the face of endless public evidence, and witnesses enough to considered the case closed in any court 1000 times over.
Lack of depth is stunning
This feels like a desperate project blue book part 2 in documentary form
For real! Fact!
yes its for the mentally challenged. Stupid doc from start to finish
need you on a clip i made dedicated to this subject! see ya under there! :) Much love!
Nothing desperate about it, just trying to shed rational light on extraordinary claims.
What are your exact criticisms?
Interesting🙂I love science and reality. I just want to say that in this debunking there is some holes to be filled out. And let me tell a story from 1985 in Denmark. I was a intelligens patrol soldier in the Danish army at that time and was nearly living in the forest constantly. It was the cold war so the Red Army was our main objective at that time. I remember one night the alarm goes off and we all run to our main duties getting ready for what was comming. In the background we could hear the F 104 starfighter warming up and in a few minuttes they was airborne with full power beyound mack 2 on the way to a Danish Island Bornholm close to the Russian Border. We found out later that Nato has been watching on rader 2 misiles(at the time that was what the fought) comming in at 18000 km/h toward Danish teritorie. The pilots could see the objects on rader and 4 different raders on the ground as well observe the objects. Then the f 104 arrive the spot and the pilots looked out and confirmed the objects visual. And all this is on record🙂The pilots then say to ground control the bookey is right ahead weapons locket on, and then the pilots looked op and no objects to see. The pilots report back bookey was gone, then the ground rader could see that objects have accellerated up trogh Sweeden with 22000 km/h. And all this is comfirmed from 4 radar stations and pilots as well. So debunk that
🙂
Think you have your speeds x10 😂
I watch, I listen, and I smile to myself. Such nonsense to those of us who know different.
Amen.
Then tell us what you know that we don't know!
@martinewebb1682: Might you please elaborate?? Some of us would very, Very Much appreciate such!!
And I suppose you have your knowledge based on experiments and research into and on the existing body of scientific knowledge of cosmology, biology, astrophysics, etc. ready? Your qualifications rival those of the scientists in question?
@@retheadeetlefs2793 ... Actual experience out ways any amount of qualifications, first hand knowledge through experience is all one needs to be able to sit back and smile to ones self, what I have known that exists and is possible for the last 53 years all these experts, scientists and professors say is an impossibility, they haven't a clue.
What a terrible program. The McMinnville incident has never been shown to be a hoax.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/McMinnville_UFO_photographs - there are pressing reasons for considering it to be a hoax. And that stereotypical saucer shape - oh my. Remember that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, which do not exist for any encounter being a verified alien encounter.
I watched this with an open mind as I like to always like to consider both sides of a story. We are all more than familiar with the incidents that you covered and obviously know about the debunks. Something new would have been interesting. However, the most disappointing thing was your lineup of experts, especially the astronomers. "Nothing can travel faster than the speed of light" Astronomers should be aware that galaxies have been proven to be moving faster away from each other than the speed of light. What we know about physics is being updated, and amended constantly. What is true today in physics might not be in the future. To state that we understand the laws of physics, based on 100 + year old theories is naive. We should all keep an open mind!
Thank you!!
Yup! The expansion of space itself is not limited by the speed of light... he left that little nugget out.
Bob Lazar's explained experiences working on a UAP. The workings of the craft. What element 115 is and how it's used.
There being many too many unexplainable occurrences since the 40's and early 50s.
Before travelling faster than the sound breaking the sound barrier , people also told the same: "It is not possible to go faster than the sound, it might break the laws of the physics ... he he".
The ufo movie I do not want to watch.
I enjoyed this. But I can't shake the nagging suspicion that it may have been just as much "engineered" as it was "objective". Information control can come in all shapes and sizes, even packaged as skeptical/open minded reporting. It was all just too "canned" for me.
yes its a crock of shit. from start to finish lolol
Yeah, just taking the first story that they called the least believable, they imply the journal was written later, when it has been dated. They make it sound like the people investigated the craft for 45 minutes, when it was 5 minutes for them and 45 minutes for the people waiting for them, with the mechanical watches the two people that approached the craft were wearing had lost the missing time. They don't mention plaster casts of the imprints in the soil from the landing. They don't mention that only 18 minutes of the taped audio was released to the public out of 8 hours of tape. They don't mention that the guy that interacted with the craft testified to Congress last summer, or that his medical records for several years after the encounter were classified by the VA and not even accessible by his VA doctors or his Congressmen. They don't mention corroborating radar contacts, etc.
And that's the one they thought was least believable, lol
The narrator/producer/writer is a sponsored debunker. He has a string of books covering a wide range of subjects that he "debunks". To give you an example of what he does, and who he does it on behalf of consider this, he states that Lee Harvey Oswald was a sole lone nut as well as that the MK-Ultra experiments are myth. The very same powers that would wish this info to be put out there is the same power that claims there are no UAP. This film is propaganda to counter the recent events in Congress and the media. The powers that be would keep this under wraps will do so with max effort until the very day the floodgate breaks.
@@jaydouglas5847 no shit . Crazy. This doc was some of the weakest shit iv ever seen. With head Idiot Mick West and his brilliance LOL
@@williamreynolds6475 THis is a hilarious production, i laughed right from the beginning all the way to the end. When they're looking at the Gimbal with head debunker Mick West was the funniest part. Mick thinks its a fighter jet thats 20-30 miles away. While in the original clip by the pentagon the pilots clearly state "LOOK AT THE SA there is a whole FLEET OF THEM" so a whole fleet of unidentified fighter jets INSIDE WAR GAME AIRSPACE were attributed to a UAP account... Brian Dunning really needs to give his head a shake and snap out of it. The cumulative evidence is overwhelming and these fragmented lame debunk attempts are for the mentally challenged. What a joke doc, thats going to live on the internet forever as we move into full disclosure and the whole world laughs at these clowns.
So this movie is based on the fact that our understanding of physics dictates aliens can't reach us, and look we're not destroyed by aliens and haven't seen any so aliens don't exist and can't reach us? That is thinking like an ant in an anthill.
Exactly. Thank you!!
This movie is based on the need for rational inquiry into mundane explanations before leaping into "wow must be aliens".
The sames goes for being able to get a good video, for starters if they are advanced enough why would they let us photograph them, clearly they are hiding from us, so not having good video and bringing proof that there are more phones in the world than people does not go well either. It's comparing our understanding with their technology. Doesnt make any sense.
Yes, this.
Those who make mundane statements like @howardmilano is missing the point of the video. I've stated elsewhere in this thread, why not assume Leprechauns? Or witches? Could be Bigfoots. They probably have iPhones and airplanes by now. Why jump to little gray people from outer space?
great comment, best analogy for this movie!! The whole whole thing is made from the perspective of an "ant"
Well this has turned me completely off being interested in ufos!
The concept that you could see the lighthouse, at ground level, through the trees - but it wasn't visible from the elevated control tower on the nearby air base seems unlikely. Also on the tape the guy said the light was red. Lighthouses don't have red lights.
My thoughts exactly, some of the debunking was piss poor
I’m 73 and in 1969 I saw a triangular solid black object hovering 100 feet over my head in 35 to 40 mph wind gusts. It was completely black against a black sky it looked like a hole in the sky I couldn’t see the object or any details I could only see the absence of stars like a hole in the sky it was at least 350 to 400 feet on a each side it was moving slightly because the stars were winking in and out on the edge of the object. A blue white light came from the object and illuminated me my lady friend and my truck the circle of light was roughly twice as large as my 1969 Chevy half ton pickup truck. I was fishing on the beach in Fort Pierce Florida at the time and was standing in my truck bed changing into dry clothing as I had fallen into the surf and needed dry clothing. I looked up at the source of the light it was on for maybe 15 seconds and then shut off when the object started to move slowly south parallel to A1A and the beach. It was moving at about a slow walk for about 600 feet as it moved away the apparent shape changed to a narrow rectangle shape or the classic cigar shape as I was now looking at it from the side I still could not see the object only the absence of star light in the narrow rectangle shape. The blue white light turned on again and illuminated a car parked directly under the object on the side of the road a person got out of the driver side door and looked up at the object again the light was on for another 15 seconds or so and then turned off. I watched it move south and it got smaller and smaller until it disappeared. There were 6 other witnesses of which my lady friend was not one. She saw it just like I did but she ran to her car and disappeared. I’ve never saw her again. I tried to contact her but she wouldn’t return my calls and she quit her job and I don’t know what happened to her that was our first date. Of the other witnesses they all saw the same thing that I saw except one and he saw a completely different thing that didn’t conform with the rest of us he was very agitated and refused to talk about it ever again. He saw the light, but his description was completely different than everybody else’s. I don’t know what I saw but I know that nothing that we had flying at that time or now could hover silently in a 35 mph wind and not be buffeted around violently. I guess it was a classic unidentified flying object. Two odd things I had a 2 hour missing time occurrence and so did the rest of the whiteness’s I have had 3 other missing time occurrences years after this event, one of which also involved my wife.
Sounds like you all have been abducted. Read "Missing Time" by Budd Hopkins for starters.
Have you ever thought of having hypnotherapy? Going back..filling in the time.
amazing story. You tell it in a matter of fact style. Im still hoping to witness something like you ve seen.
I have never seen anything of alien stuff in my life, I'm 56 and until now I only see comments, CZcams videos and some tv shows that talk about it, but personally nothing. I don't know how will I react if I see something like that, maybe I will RUN like Forrest Gump and hide somewhere no one will find me ever, maybe like your lady friend, and maybe I'll find her haha 😅 That is a very scary experience , really, mostly when 2 hours of your life where taken and you don't know what happen. May be you have some kind of implants on you ( in your arm, or head, or neck), and that is why you have been abducted later on, and they erased your memory so you are not scare of what they did to you 😮 OMG! 😱 I wish you're ok 🙏🙏🙏
You really have exceptional eyesight: Seeing something completely black against a black sky. 😂
In reference to the gimbal videos, if the rotation of the moving pivots of the camera are what caused the object to rotate, would rather just the single object in the frame rotating, the entire view would rotate in the same manner as the object.
If you attribute the objects rotation to camera rotation, why only one object rotates?
Because thats the mainstream explanation, how many times has the mainstream been wrong? 😂
Because he doesn't know wtf he's talking about maybe?
Because he's a video game programmer, and a total tosser!
Mick West explains it really well. That is, if you want your beliefs challenged.
The camera itself is fixed inside the pod and does not rotate. The lens/prism/mirror mechanism in front of it is what is gimbaled. There is an animation from the manufacturer showing this at 58:28 in the film. I'm sure you can imagine that a video feed which is always spinning around would not be very useful.
The last 3 minutes about interstellar phone calls is brilliant. The speed of light is the maximum speed limit of the universe. Consider the Voyager probes we sent off into the galaxy in 1977. How many light years have they travelled so far? One or 10? Neither. They have so travelled less than ONE LIGHT DAY from Earth.
The speed of light is the fastest thing WE know. For now.
I saw it with my own eyes and less than 200 feet above my head, a big "Vanta" black isoseles triangle with six tiny lights, three at each corner and three halfway between each corner. The lights matched the apparent size and brightness of the background stars. This "craft"...and it certainly was a craft NOT an airplane, a helicopter, a balloon, a kite, a flock of geese, nor a cloud of gas. It was as large and expansive as a building. Two tips of its wings spanned the banks of the river I was near. It was just above the tree tops and silently hovering...then moving almost imperceptibly slow following the river in a NW direction. Its mass blocked the known nighttime star constellations as it passed over. If you were not looking directly at it, you would have missed it. I pointed it out to a friend who was walking with me. He had trouble locating it even as I was pointing directly at the center of this massive craft. He was trying to find something much smaller or farther up. I was losing it...screaming, "It's huge, it's right above us...right there!" following it the whole time with my finger. It then began to pick up speed but, still gliding soundlessly towards the horizon. When it hit the horizon there was a bright flash...and it was gone. My friend only saw the flash that lit up the horizon just as my finger pointed towards that very spot. This made us both jump. My friend asked me, "What was that?" I said, "I don't know." This happened in late Autumn, early Winter 1980. As far as I know, our military didn't have anything like that.
It is really too bad that you cannot debate Brian D. in front of a live audience. I suspect he would politely decline. He seems to have his mind made up. Very sad.
..... I saw the same thing after smoking some black afgan .
Mmmm, no, you didn't
Please stop doing drugs. God bless you.
The only way these “Galaxy is flat ‘ by analogy experts will realize there’s more out there than they can see, is when an alien life form group comes and collects them, and whisks them off to another Galaxy for a real edu experience 😂.. Hopefully they’ll be made to write a hundred times, in multiple dimensions (for all of the equally offended inter dimensional groups).. with a huge quantum compatible, multidimensional piece of chalk, on their proverbial blackboards..”I was wrong, you exist, and you’ve been to our earth many times” and have to wear a galactic dunce hat until returned to earth.. The ship will have to be staffed with Bigfoot, as they probably don’t believe in those either..with a team of grays working as ship maintenance..just for good measure. 😂😅😊 It’ll be a quantum step for academia to catch up with the reality of things, but we can remain hopeful! ❤😊
Haha, "alien can't break the laws of physics that we humans made up." That is so damn stupid to say. There are planets out there where they without a doubt have different material sciences that we have. They could have a different periodic table, or they have more stable versions of elements in plenty that we do not.
You really don’t understand science do you?
@@axeman1973 Do you really think human science is "as good as it gets"? 😤 We have a long way to go...!
Physics can be calculated by using mathematical formulas. All they are saying is that math is the same everywhere, so the physics as we understand them would also be the same everywhere in the universe. You are implying that maybe aliens CAN break these laws of physics, which we formulate using math, then you are implying that somewhere in the universe 2+2 isn't 4, it has to be something else where our mathematical calculations would be incorrect. If aliens can figure out a way to get 5x5 to be anything other than 25, and their answer is correct, then those aliens can have different outcomes to calculations when applying it to physics. Does make sense what they are saying - even in a different galaxy I'm sure 10+10 is going to be 20.
SO ,WHO IS IT THAT DOESN'T WANT US TO SEE THIS VIDEO??
Are any aliens interested in us ? They probably pity us because we are on a path of making our planet uninhabitable with nuclear weapons, over population, air, water, and land pollution, very destructive wars, other forms of planetary injustices that are slowly and not so slowly killing off life here on earth.😅
The Dunning-Kruger effect came to mind while watching this video but it is was still worth a watch.
Funny. I have followed the UFO phenomenon for years. I was an optical physicist at the Naval Air Warfare center and currently teach image processing at a university. Yet, I have never heard of your "expert" Mick West. Also, the objects were tracked by RADAR as well. Hard to imagine that our best pilots could make such a novice mistake.
Its true they never mention about the radar tracking and explaine it.
This doc seems like they are cheery picking their information.
They said Einstein’s theory of relativity prevents them from getting here because of the light speed limit. But within the same theory Einstein said wormholes are a possibility.
So sure you cant move through space faster than light but you can still (in theory) get to the location faster than light takes to get there by ‘sidestepping’ through a wormhole
This show has clearly only spoken to people observing instruments as a job instead of people delving into the theoretical physics side of things.
If we only listened to the people repeating the norm we wouldn’t have made discoveries
All the big discoveries were made by people who were thought to be insane by their peers
I mean am i wrong
Very strange video
@@laughingpanda95 - imo this video is excellent because it debunks portions of the claims
debunking allows us to focus resources on the cases which aren't yet explained
for example, this video may have revealed that the man behind the Rendlesham lore was exaggerating in later years. that seems very important to know :)
and the Salas claims about Malmstrom AFB sound suspicious. :)
possibly some efforts should be expended to find out if another guard really was screaming on the phone that the base was under attack? cuz something dont add up there
@@moegreen3870 i agree. But itd more healtjy to have both our opinions in tbe same place
Rather than just one side dominating.
Ive seen so many documentaries that just go off the rails halfway instead of trying to get a real answer.
And i dont agree with debunking in the lose sense. It suggests they arnt a skwptic but will only look for the answer that fits the already thought of peramiters.
For example quantum tunneling is a way for instant communication over any distance. This doc completly avoided that proven consept in favour of the norm ( messages cant travel faster than light, when they can)
It was just a bad watch because of the cherry picking.
But the pro aliens people also cherry pick atm
Just saying its healthy for both sides to exist as they oush each other towards the truth through the disagreement
In 1980-1983 I’ve observed ufo’s in Mississippi surveying my grandparents garden fields night after night and would depart through some dimensional portal. I didn’t realize what I saw until I was much older.
Mick West is a Genius
If shows like this existed 500 years ago they would be telling us that human flight was impossible, that there will never be a cure for bacterial infection, travelling faster than the speed of sound is impossible and that the solar system and sun revolves around the earth. Never underestimate the 'know it all' arrogance of humans, especially those in the scientific community.
it doesn't work that way, you don't discover how to break the laws of physics, just because 500 years ago we knew so little does not mean it is the same now, way to make a terrible analogy that betrays the truth.
@@ToonamiAftermath I think you misunderstand what the poster is trying to convey. I believe what he means is that we find ways to defeat long held paradigms through the development of technology. In fact some of this is on display in reports and video evidence of unknown craft where the craft makes "impossible" turns and stops and moves from low to high speeds in a fraction of a second. It implies that there are technologies that we have not discovered yet that would permit these movements that anyone would offhand say would kill a human being simply from the G-forces involved.
And he is correct.
@@ToonamiAftermath perfect. breaking the sound barrier, going to the moon were engineering problems. going to other solar systems is a physics problem.
They didn’t know about e=mc squared
After 60 years of watching things disproven I agree with you. Even E=MC2 has it's problems in quantum mechanics or as Einstein put it "Spooky"... "When you think you know everything, you're setting up for failure at anything new!!" R.S...
The amount of highly credible military insiders that talk about being directly involved with working on and with ETs is astounding.
@@lucalotto8885I think these people are waiting for confirmation that their pensions and other assets will be protected before they come out publicly. Is this what you were asking?
Who? Who are these "highly credible military insiders" you're talking about? Should be easy for you to name at least 10 of them, since their numbers are so "astounding." Where is all the proof they have given us other than anecdotal hearsay? I'll wait.
Steven Greer is a kook and a snake oil salesman... Be cautious of buying in to the garbage he says. @@lucalotto8885
I remember in 2001 thinking Rudi Giuliani was one of the most capable, reliable and honest people in America... 😂
It's because we waited too long to stop putting lead in gasoline.
The one thing this program gets wrong is that the can't explain how they've already gotten here.
@Brian Dunning love this. I saw the Easter egg behind you, nice touch.
We humans based everything around our understanding, so basically, we think if it can't be done, then it's never been done before. 😕🙄
Thank you! 😄;)
That's not true at all. Plenty of imaginative people around doing the `impossible`. Plus - think about the people that `believe` we never landed on the moon.
And how many times have we proven ourselves wrong? Everyday we have a new breakthrough…
As Mr. Dunnung stated early on in this video " don't believe everything you see on tv".
Don't believe it then ! Your problem.
@@mikewilson9601he could have been agreeing… youve projected a but there
God, would you stop making these idiot humans, they're just in the way!
My dad and I saw a U.F.O. years ago land at a vacant , out of service gas station in a ghost town (we were passing through on our way to our remote cottage) There was an alien standing at the gas pump,he was trying to comunicate with it...He was saying..."take me to you LITRE" HAHAHA 🤣
I've been fortunate enough to have driven past the vla and get paid for the drive and the return drive past I stopped to go to the visitor's center, and pick up acouple post cards, driving through new mexico is one of my favorite drives, the vla is between nueces and phoenix.
We can't be the only life in the universe.
Yep, and Dunning agrees with that.
We're not.
Cats and dogs are to be included.
Hasn't been here
Yeah! What makes us think we're so special? we're not!! 🛸
so we are assuming that what we have to limit ourselves to with regards to space travel, speed of light etc.. we limit alien species to as well. The arrogance of the human species is astounding. Our understanding of physics and maths is ours and ours alone. We know little to if anything of the universe.
Correct!
Thats right, just hunderts years ago we been thinking our galaxy was the entire Universe.70 years ago we were thinking ultrasonic travel is not possible
You are spot on. Actually Hermann Bondi's inertial/gravitational dipole and my paper on electro-gravity offer a way to the solution.
Spot on! It's so dumb
Speed of electricity (or light) + electromagnetic tunnel + perpetual magnetic attraction force = FTL; Ion propulsion. Think wormhole but acceleration instead of teleportation. Add perpetual repel behind the space craft in tandem with the attraction force for silly, improbable speeds... Anti-gravity = adjustable electromagnetic field from a magnetic core, because you don't want to get caught by anything while travelling such silly speeds. Magnetic fields being dipolar doesn't matter when you have mastered electromagnetism, you can draw poles from the center of magnetic core to be hexagonal (dividing energy), or direct one single pole with all the energy. Though energy won't matter at that point since perpetual and limitless energy production has been fact since watermills (if that line of technology was continued into magneto hydro dynamics). Also, wind turbines + magnets in correct angles = perpetual energy because a magnetic field does not decay and magnetic friction = electricity = charged field = more energy rather than loss of energy.
@thebriandunning, I really enjoyed this movie as much as the other two you made. I also enjoy your podcast. My only question is: Where did you get that sweet hoodie?
Get it on the Skeptoid store: skeptoid.com/store
The Urantia book explains this in detail and it's free online and the table of contents alone is amazing
No one said that you CAN'T travel faster than light. What they said is as you approach the speed of light, time stops and gravity becomes infinite. That doesn't rule out wormholes. In fact, a wormhole used to be called an Einstein Rosen Bridge. Any travel is considered time travel. Scientists have placed atomic clocks on airliners and found they the slowed down a couple of microseconds the faster and longer they travel. This was on NOVA a decade ago. Albiciurrie LITERALLY DID THE MATH ON WARP TRAVEL,..
Yes he did and if you have a look and listen to Dr. Steven Greer who has over 30 years invested deeply into this whole subject he presents a very compelling argument regarding the whole ufo / uap topic. Why is it btw the change from ufo to uap ? Is it possible that the powers that be want this all to appear to be a brand new subject and not that it's really over 70 years old.
That way we can start hiding it in plain site anew ;-)
These are the same scientists who say a man can become a woman
@@PAPA_BAV No they don't. Nobody has ever said that.
@kidkunjer you haven't talked to a liberal scientist, have you?
Gravity is faster than light.
Would the Stealth Bomber be considered extrodinary if it was seen before the general public was told about it, when it was still considered classified?
What would be extraordinary is if it was flyn around when Christopher Columbus was sailing.
I was thinking more so of the guy that the government drove crazy because he saw experiemental aircraft, and intercepted government frequiencies so the government drove the man crazy with false messages and false information.
Also the Columbus situation could've been many different things that may not have had explaination back then. With that said Columbus wasn't the greates navigator or person. His log mentioned how he lied to his crew about the length of the voyage and kept telling them they were almost there. He didn't do proper navigational methods thus lied about how long the voyage would take.
Also all of the Columbus talk even mine above isn't real evidence as described in the video. Saying it is aliens is just speculation. There are theories, it could've been a star, a meteor shower reflective luminous marine life, fires in the distance, or St. Elmo's Fire (plasma discharge observed by sailors). If we are going to throw aliens into it though we can say it was an angel, a wil-o-wisp, a dragon, time traveling graden gnomes. My point is with the Columbus situation is we just don't know what it was and can't know because his journal isn't great evidence.
Back around 1990 or so, I was on vacation with my family near a lake in e. Washington state, The lake was surrounded by very high foothills, creating a canyon-like effect. One day, a weird craft came barreling down the length of the lake, maybe 500 feet or so above the water...I knew that it was some sort of military plane, but was quite radical looking!...Turned out to be a Stealth Bomber on maneuvers...it was a rare sight back then...we were quite freaked out!
@@curbozerboomer1773 I remember hearing a lot about triangular UFOs in the late 80's early 90's... turns out the stealth bomber is quite triangular. Once that was released to the public and eventually retired in the 2000s people didn't see triangle UFOs anymore..
Oh cool who doesn't want me to see since CZcams suggested this? Obviously not CZcams or anyone who can pull strings with CZcams.
Every summer usually during the day when I go outside, I have shadow people that follow me, also now I have noticed when I am driving the shadow people have a shadow car they use to follow me. The police and government refuse to help me. Everyone I warm about this finds out they are being followed in a similar manner.
Your whole life is one big shadow….what u going on about 😂
I think he’s trying to debunk what we already know
Precisely
You should have covered the varginha brasil incident in 1996.
I think eyewitness accounts from people that had encounters feet away from beings.. and family members of victims affected are far more compelling than 62 school children.
Even though you misrepresented how those Ariel school children were viewed…no one ever said they were poor African children who hadn’t been exposed to movies. That was you speaking from an agenda to discredit those accounts.
This is 90 minutes that I’ll never be able to get back. This was such a one sided, biased documentary that even Carl Sagan would have serious issues with it. A COMPLETE waste of my time.
@@ethannielson942 Yeah, I was trying to be as nice as possible but this Brian Dunning guy had a clear agenda. Also, this is his niche. I call it dishonest skepticism.
Sir, thank you so much! Seriously! This was very informative and you hit my vein right where i needed it. These UAP sightings have been the most compelling to me for a long time and now i know the rational explanation thanks to you and your team! I do still think NHI engineered/piloted UAP could be real after last year's boom of info, but theres still alot of work ahead to prove it! Thanks again! I always make it a point to challenge my beliefs and let science and philosophy lead the way so as not to become dogmatic!
Regarding the second Navy video, the "fast" object: if what we are viewing is indeed the effect of parallax, for instance, if it were a stationary balloon, as suggested, wouldn't the object appear to be moving in the opposite direction? It appears to be tracking in the same direction as the jet, so I don't see how it could be explained by parallax. 🤷♀️
200 years or more ago it wasn't even possible wishful thinking of flying or communicating with a cellphone more powerful today than the computer they used 60 years ago. If you would have taken the smartest scientific people and asked them about that they would have laughed and tell you that it's physically impossible. Do you get it?
Some of us get it - most people will not.
'Scientific people'? What the... LOL. Someone is confused and it isn't Brian Dunning
The news media was not even covering the Wright brothers first flight and laughing about it as they were so convienced it was not possible.
No they wouldn't have. My late father in law was a television repairman who predicted flat screen tvs 50 years ago, and he was not the sharpest tool in the shed. 60 years ago, Dick Tracy had a two way wrist television. Scientific knowledge and inventiveness is pretty amazing, but they all work within the laws of physics. None of these new amazing inventions violate any of the physical laws, they just access newer technology.
@@rbdemp lots of people thought that Tesla was doing magic tricks when he started with remote control. It was within the know physique back then. It's more easy to forsee an evolving technology, but when the physique is not know at all it's more on the realm of magic. Even Tesla though you couldn't split the atom, or that it didn't release anything. So I believe you wrong. When we don't know something we just can't predict what we don't know!
I'd like to see you take on a few tougher challenges. Like say all the countless hours of footage over the years from Mexico. Btw the pilots in the navy/airforce videos you're trying so hard to debunk had a hell of a lot more information than just a few simple videos. They had these things on radar and actually clocked their speeds and elevations through the entire thing. Now if you want to get into a discussion about the potential psy op they could be pushing we might be able to talk. But if you're just gonna look at those videos without the rest of the information they provide I can't take this seriously. It feels low budget and honestly a lot more disengenous than the recent testimonies.
Brian Dunning works on Skeptoid. Try on there if you want answers to many of your questions.
Is anyone else here because they have a video of ufo activity on their phone? I have an incredible 1min video of me and my brother out walleye fishing around 1030pm in lake Michigan
If you say Wink Martindale into the mirror 10 times you’ll wake-up wearing that cool sweatshirt he’s got on
Hahaha, Brian Dunning graduate of Jim Oberg's School of debunkers.
I'm going to side with the military police, and, there was about 25 or 30 of them that conducted the search operation at Rendlesham. These individuals were assigned to guard a nuclear stockpile, but were so stupid, they couldn't distinguish a lighthouse blinking light from a floating object that shot up into the sky, Yeah Ok.
And, The Ariel School Incident, I'm going with Dr. John Mack's conclusion and the kids who witnessed and drew similar pictures, while separated from each other. And today their story remains the same. Couldn't continue, but, I'm sure you got it all explained.
he is unbiased LOL
This Brian guy is joke. Disinformation plant
The garbage is coming out of your mouth brian
"From the Jim Oberg school" would be a very great honor. Thank you!
@@thebriandunning you're an absolute disgrace. I've never watched a more biased and unbalanced doco. You cherry pick facts that suit your agenda and claim this report to be science based, it is nothing of the sort. You get some close minded arrogant science hacks that noone has ever heard of before to back up your ill informed 'scientific' claims whilst dismissing radar evidence, thousands of sightings and disclosures from trained observers and from highly credentialed military staff entrusted with our most dangerous and expensive weapons. Somehow you think that despite this they misinterpret what they are seeing and are trained to observe. Just a terrible job attempting to discredit and debunk and obviously a complete hit job on the topic. Well done on exposing yourself.
Sir the craft our whole family observed wasn't on TV.
Oh boy. I hope you got some good footage to show others, or you might not be believed.
this may be the worst of it all, the disrespect for the experiencers, even for TOP GUN instructors who unlike all the debunkers, WERE THERE
that was probably Venus
It was probably a barium gas cloud release 😂
@@alightinthesky7586 What's funny is that Fravor's story has changed a little every time he tells it. But it wasn't believable from the beginning anyways.
I only watched the Rendlesham segment then quickly concluded this Brian Dunning character is not a sceptic but a debunker. Highlighting the five second sequence of the lighthouse corresponding with the Halt recording but completely ignoring the fact they were seeing a "strange small RED light", and that the Orford Ness Lighthouse only displayed a white light is misleading in the extreme. I could go on, but simply can't be bothered. If Dunning can make such a sloppy attempt with Rendlesham then I haven't the time or inclination to watch the rest of his nonsense.
amen!
You can get a much better discussion in far more detail here, directly from the people who were there at the time and interviewed by the BBC: ianridpath.com/ufo/rendlesham1c.html
100% this Dunning guy just cherry picks some facts and ignores others, a really poor documentary.
@@thebriandunningthat is just more BS
There are way better true rendition of the actual story on history channel
He lost me when his explanation if the Gimbal was "There you have it, probably nothing at all" 😅..
What a detailed explanation.😮
No audio either! Of course not.
Being ex-military and having served 5 years in an Air Photo Unit (as both Imagery Analyst, as well as System Operator), I can confirm pilots have little idea how some of the imaging pods work, especially the fighter jet guys since their imaging legs and sorties are relatively short, and they have to actually focus on flying vs imaging. Leave the videos and photos to the proper Imagery Analysts. Also, US Congress has proven to be filled with the dumbest and most incompetent people now.
That being said, I am hoping hope that there will be another radio signal from the civilisation that sent us the Wow! radio signal. Hopefully, within this lifetime! (or we confirm that the signal is a stochastic repeater...)
Well said, great account of your expertise in imagery. Give more voice to experts in their field.
So much conspiracy theories surrounding military stuff. I worked in U.K. defence in a secure facility where no one else on the base was privy to what we did. And yes there were people who said “they have ufo stuff in there”. lol! The truth was far more mundane, to me anyway.
Brian debunked the Wow signal already, Skeptoid 342
There a great video of a pilot "explaining" how their systems work, while actually demonstrating to every half-competent amateur photographer that he is simply clueless about how basic cameras work ...
This was an interesting documentary but it is full of inaccuracies. The bottom line is the craft, the bodies have been recovered and are in contractors hands. Don't believe it? Ask yourself why President Biden signed into law whistleblower protestation for those that come forward to testify about reverse engineering of materials and craft of non human origin. Watch the testimony of the former head of the UAP task force under oath before congress. His claims were supported by the testimony before the Inspector General of over 20 additional whistleblowers with "first hand experience". Read the Schumer/Rounds proposed amendment to the 2023 NDAA which included a 7 year plan to disclose the truth of the UFO/UAP phenomenon to the public as well as provisions for the government to take back possession of materials and craft in the hands of contractors.. The time for denial is over. We must deal with the truth and move forward.
I love that the ad preceding this is for the Gaia network...
The laws of physics are the same everywhere, says Dr. I think it's very narrow-minded, because we're sitting here on a planet and we don't know what the neighbor is doing, it's very arrogant to say that the laws are the same everywhere. You can say "probably" ok, but something like "no" is not acceptable. Timestamp: 13:50
Thank you for this important, interesting and educational documentary! A much needed salve for the UFO fervour pervading the socials currently. Having seen UFOs twice in nearly 50 years of life, both events very different, with one occurring at night during the 1990s and another during the day around 2014, I still haven't found viable explanations for either.
What one did you see in the 1990s, I saw one too
As soon as they said the laws of Physics are immutable was a red flag. Einstein would not be so presumptuous. Maybe they could explain spooky entanglement at a distance. I’m sure Mick West would have an answer.
The Nimitz data involved multiple readings providing a wealth of data. All ignored. The hatchet job on Rendlesham Forest and Ariel School as laughable if it wasn’t so downright misleading. Again evidence was ignored. I found myself concerned watching this. Someone is paying a lot of money to make this film and actually distorting data and ignoring information to fit an agenda.
Fart monsters from 🪐 outer space😂?
My favorite part was the use of the scientific term 'knucklehead' to describe hoaxers. :)
Low information zone….. “garbage in garbage out”! Outstanding outstanding information!
What about the Chicago airport incident let me guess when the moon is facing the sun the lighting makes some Vapor from a cloud makes a round image hovering over the control tower
The hardcore of people pushing for a non-human intelligence explanation to some UAP, aren’t suggesting an extraterrestrial origin to the phenomenon.
They’re considering the possibility of it being local and proposing we may have a limited understanding of the nature of reality.
It’s true we have a set of tried and tested rules according to which we evaluate nature, and we call it scientific knowledge. But science is not dogma, and we’ve reached our current level of understanding being curious about the oddities of nature and questioning the status quo.
Exactly
Then you must conclude that we are not in a position to suggest anything other than the rational explanations within our understanding. If the explanation is outside of our current understanding then it is outside, and any speculation is no different to fantasy.
@@arcanics1971 Persistent testimonies from reliable witnesses of unusual events, apparently incompatible with our current knowledge, should elicit our curiosity. Scientific progress originates from the study of outlier data.
If we just abide by the orthodoxy, we’re into religion, not science.
Out of everything in the comments this one & the 3 responses are those which make me feel most comfortable.
Occam's razor applies. The most likely explanation is NOT aliens OR something else unlikely, whereas we KNOW humans are error prone in making observations.
I remember an old TV show called Project UFO, where two men from the Air Force would investigate UFO sightings, and usually come up with an explanation. (though the end of the episode would imply that the incidents were real.)
I remember one incident where the investigators themselves saw a odd craft floating past the restaurant where they were eating. Both took copious notes... but when they compared them... found out that the notes didn't match! Also, the craft was a mock-up hung from a helicopter as a publicity stunt.
LOL I liked that show
Hide it all in plain site with a healthy dose of the giggle factor. Been doing that for decades.
Look what the mayor of Pheonix did after 10,000 people reported those lights in the sky all over the area one night on March 13 1997. He paraded a staff member out at the press conference the next day dressed as a 7 foot ET. You better believe he didn't come up with that on his own. He even apologized the next day for insulting all his citizens intelligence to save his political face.
Again it's all very carefully orchestrated. But people are waking up!
there's more than that, they call them selves the sons of God and they were 150 feet in front of me and there ain't no way in hell the government can explain this one they showed me the magnetic sphere of the Earth and we are in trouble😮😮😮😮 and I've seen the governments craft I know what they have and what Russia has
Hey! You're from the 80's, too!!!
60's, really. Looks like more than a few remember that show.@@a.r.r.5626
Mr dunning ! Hi ! Jay Lloyd from Liverpool this video is what I needed to see ! It is so good to watch ! Well done! But can you personally tell what u think about bob lazar to me ! Am with you but bob lazar is so convincing too ! Pls help with expectation ! If u can thanks
This movie is so full of shit this movie is basically calling all the pilots and whistle blowers liers this movies has 3 cast members saying thousands of honest people are liers fucking funny as hell
Not to mention this guy constantly has a condescending grin on his face that just makes u want to punch it…
A piss poor effort at debunking the Ariel school incident. And a very disgusting character assassination of Dr John Mack. "His whole thing was persuading people" what a bunch of total BS.
So, I will be waiting for you to produce a rebuttal on his more complete and behind-the-scenes expose. I find it disgusting to use children to make your point about fake UFO stories.
Wack-job UFO freaks are a disgrace to true Ufologists. And I am proud to side with them and not you.
Right
A farce!!!! amazing how were supposed to listen to some old game maker over commander from the navy!!!!! haha!!!!!! WAKE UP! Disclosure is here!
When and if it becomes no shadow of a doubt that it's all real, wish I could see the look on his face😂
Don't forget the idiocy by Mick West and his hilarious gimbal debunk he thought it was a fighter jet 20-30 miles away but in the original clip the pilot clearly states "look at the SA there is a whole fleet of them" a whole fleet of unidentified fighter jets...what a joke. He also thought the tictac was a JET LINER!!!! INISIDE A WARGAME AIRSPACE!!! with e2 hawk eye in the air that can identify drift wood on sufrace of the ocean from 250 miles away. With 2 warships on the ocean and fighters in the air. ( the tictoc thing is not in this doc but its in his big debunk in another clip)
I'm 53 year's old now. And there are two things that I've seen with my own eyes that have no explanation. The long ass lines at Walmart on any given Tuesday and the fact that only 3 people work at my local DMV. Just baffling!!
Legal definition of "Motor Vehicle"........"The term Motor Vehicle means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and USED FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES on the highways in the transportation of passengers, passengers and property or property or cargo."
ALL drivers licenses are commercial drivers licenses.
DUDE THE CAT IS OUT OF BAG....
AND YOU AND THE PEOPLE BEHIND THIS INSIDIOUS CHANNEL CAN NOT PUT IT BACK INSIDE.
Brilliant, real scientific evidence !
Thank goodness for scientists like him.
I prefer far more knowledgeable scientists like Gary Nolan, Dr Nolan would rinse this guy in minutes
I am a pilot I saw a black triangle. 50 feet over my head, moving at 10 miles an hour. I was not alone, but other witnesses solve the exact same thing explain that.
How big was it?
We don't have to explain it. It's your claim. You do. And so far your evidence is 'I said so'.
I saw a thing. I don’t know what it was. Therefore, aliens. 🙄
...and then you woke up.
wow
I do appreciate the grounded nature of being a skeptic. I've been a skeptic most of my life, even though I witnessed the impossible as a young teen. After a long military career, nothing I've become aware of in terms of technology has made me hit that ah ha moment.
Using his progressive approach to disproving each event, I still haven't been made aware of anything to make me think what I witnessed could be explained.
I understand that I have no way of proving or even recreating my experience. So for the rest of you, my account can't be taken as fact. It still doesn't change that for me, it stands up to all the scrutiny I've been made aware, and has changed my behavior of deriding UFO freaks to finally having to accept that I am a legitimate witness to a real life UFO. I am not one to waste my time searching for answers to things I once believed were stupid, and yet that is what I've done, spent a lot of time searching for answers.
I would welcome Brian Dunning researching what I experienced and see if he can dig up a logical explanation.
There have been thousands of legitimate UFO sightings made by the most credible witnesses, so it's simply a fact that it is what it is. However, you've come to the wrong place if you want to start talking aliens because this Dunning guy doesn't believe in UFO's or ET. He pretends he does but he doesn't.
Since he is a debunker and not a skeptic, it is easy to figure out what he would do with your experience. Toss it out. Don't believe your lying eyes. You're crazy. That's standard fare from debunkers. A true skeptic begins analysis with an open mind and a willingness to go where the evidence leads.
@@gbennett58 Nah. I'll spot if he's objective or not. I question everyone until they show me they are competent and trustworthy. I know what I saw. I'm just as curious if he's a fraud or not. So I would welcome observing his techniques and analysis and if he's just playing mind games or actually doing legit work.