My uncle was stationed in the pentagon on 911, his office was in the wing that was hit. He told me the wing was under maintenance and was empty when it was hit. He was in an outside office building when it happened. Sus.
why is it sus; E-Wedge was being rebuilt for years before 911. I spent a year in there prior to 911 putting up steel for new mechanical towers and elevator shafts
So much irrefutable evidence against a plane hitting the Pentagon. Several videos showing footage of a cruise missile flying towards the Pentagon on the day. The engine at the "crash" site was the wrong type for the plane that supposedly hit it. Every expert pilot ever interviewed about it saying it was completely impossible to fly a plane that low and not hit any of the lampposts on the way in. A complete la la fantasy.
It's not that incredible considering the broadcast was 325 lines at 10fps. Radio waves travel perpetually in space, so the 234,000 miles is nothing compared to Voyager 1's 14 billion miles, which is still broadcasting a signal back to Earth but with a 22+ hr delay. The delay from the moon and back is only 1.33 seconds.
@@pumaraebon80 Different radio frequencies and amplitudes. The signal from the moon was very low frequency and very high amplitude. Many times greater than the weak signal we get to our phones. You can complain to your service provider and they will be more likely to install a tower closer to your house, which may be more exposed to your master bedroom.
@@efficiencyinavanYeah but that just makes it all the easier to fake. Easy explanations and answers for the people. Why spend 26 bill creating a mission that might fail miserably and embarrass your nation in a time of competition, when you can spend 1 Bill or less just faking it.
You’re telling me that we had the technology back in the 60s and 70s. Then lost all technology we used and have never been back since. We’ve never left the atmosphere!!
Is it so hard for your small brain to understand that it was incredibly expensive and there is no such benefit from going to the moon that would cover these expenses? Is it so hard for you or you just pathetic troll?
@@javiii8337 sorry flat earth is absolutely one of them. Eddie is a fucking idiot but that doesn't discredit that the earth is flat. There's way too many government documents that admit it's flat, no curvature measured... Boats don't go over a curve when you can zoom in with a camera and they come back into view. This was the biggest round earth defense for centuries and now anyone with a camera with decent zoom can prove it wrong but nobody cares cuz they're all brainwashed like you bro. You see where Joe Rogan talks with others about flat earth, just says there all stupid and retarded over and over but no science to back his shit... Your god Joe Rogan wants you to feel retarded if you even question the globe, the dumb pos sold his soul to the devil long ago, uses his all seeing eye symbol as well. Idiots gather in giant crowds, turns out Joe has a bigger crowd than CNN. Y'all are fucking idiots and fell for the trump scam too lol
7:00 lmao what a load of bullshit, talk about believing in stupid conspiracies. They probably locked them in a cage with a bear and and eagle when they caught them stuffing diamonds inside their lower end 😂😂😂
@@alainportant6412 took me about 5 minutes to confirm this “conspiracy”… Von Braun used prisoners from the Dora-Mittelbau concentration camp for labor. They were regularly worked to death and publicly executed
Seriously? Again? What on Earth does your inability to understand a weak 2.4 - 5 GHz signal from a router to your device have to do with the Apollo Programme? Incidentally, the last manned lunar landing was 52 years ago, not 55. Can I suggest that you leave your basement periodically? - and not simply in the interest of your wi fi signal.
I’m telling you, Joe, that was a tomahawk cruise missile, the hole was not even big enough for a fuselage. There was no wings no engines no seats no luggage just tomahawk cruise missile pieces.
No sign of burn on the grass, it came in low. Also I was watching this live and Jamie McIntyre with CNN was interviewing someone at the Pentagon and he raced around the building with his cameraman and there was NO debris whatsoever. Tiny hole and no damage from the wings. This makes me so mad. And what they did to Jamie.
I cant believe the amount of times I've heard Joe explain operation paperclip and that theres still people who have never heard about it. I learned about it when I was like 9 years old only cause I was interested in WW2 massively at the age. But just goes to show, you dont even need to be into conspiracies to have heard about it lol.
The reason it isn’t taught is because that’s something the US doesn’t want people to know. They want us to believe everything made and done was by Americans. What good is it if the greatest feat by mankind was aided by Nazis
@@koreywilliams8418 that’s why I find it hilarious the fake moon landing conspiracy theorists always leave out the fact we even got to the moon was because Nazis helped us out and USSR Nazis backed it up that we landed on the moon lol
@@97NikeSb That's because nobody has ever gone to the moon, smart guy ! You should watch the video where the head guy at NASA says that we haven't gone back to the moon because we don't have the technology. You could ask to see the video footage of the moon landing that according to NASA was recorded over and that they habe absolutely no footage, pictures, voice recordings. You can watch them grab wires when they are supposedly on the spaceship floating in space. Go watch the valuetainment podcast with the dude who has footage that says "Do not release to public" and basically proves that it is bullshit. You do absolutely no research, fill in the blank parts of a story with your imagination and believe it to be 100% facts.
I love how homeboy in the pink shirt says the moon landing hoax is so laughable and then admits he never even looked into it. Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance. Unfortunately, more people are like him than not. People say the education system in America has failed us. I say it's succeeded. The leaders of this country, whoever they may be, do not want intelligent critical thinking citizens.
@@patstaysuckafreeboss8006 I agree. I made this comment 4 years ago and it cracks me up today. I've become a giant MMA fan in the past 2 and a half years and I like Ben Askren. It's great to see evidence of me not knowing who he is once. I still don't agree with him here and I'm slightly disappointed that he would be so wilfully ignorant but regardless I still like the guy.
I am a believer in the Mars missions. But I heard an anecdotal story. There was a visitor to JPL. He was watching the monitor with a view of Mars. Suddenly a a man wearing a shirt walked into view and left. Suddenly an Employee of JPL got up an stepped in front of the monitor.
Tons of interesting guests since then, you just gotta pick and choice. I skip all the MMA live shows, and I only watch the comedian guests when I want pure laughs and bs.
@@ActionJackson669 joe was a lot more relaxed then and he actually had civil arguements and would go at people when they were false. Now he agrees with every single body that goes on.
No I used to wonder about the same thing but in reality there's just so many episodes that the interesting ones become more scarce. When he only had so many episodes it made the 2 with Alex Jones, the alien shit, Elon Musk and conspiracy episodes etc more common. Now the 3rd time around with Alex etc is surrounded with 1500 plain podcasts.
NASA is the protective layer to the truth. In 2007, when Google announced a 34 million dollar reward* for any private organization to send a rover to the Moon and live broadcast the Apollo landing sites, why do you think NASA immediately made the landing zones a restricted area? Do you really think it was to "preserve history"? No, they were more likely protecting the truth. *30m for landing on Moon, and an additional 4m for live recording the Apollo landing sites.
2001 A space oddesy looks like shit compared to the apollo footage. Im tierd of people saying Kubrick did it when there is actually no way of "faking" it. how can you drive for miles non stop in a studio for example? xd
I have always been a skeptic man walked on the moon. What I find perplexing is why would the astronauts comment on UFOs on the moon's surface observing them. Those types of comments would not be necessary, unless they were actually on the moon's surface.
What they mean is aliens were watching them, we were watching them, we are an alien hybrid but,,, aliens are not living breathing beings they are spirits
In 10 mins Joe blew Ben's mind out his head and he went from saying "the moon landing conspiracy is the most bs" to saying "that's definitely faked I can see the strings" 😂😂😂
@@jdstox1 Exactly, these guys are at the same time admitting that the moon's gravity is much less than earth's but then refusing to acknowledge that what they are seeing is the obvious result of that. My mind is hurting from watching this, and I actually like Rogan.
Yea the result is too obvious. The moon landing is fake you just need to accept it already. Get over it. You guys don’t think it’s weird that these dudes would be bouncing around and literally rolling in jagged moon rocks when the slightest cut on your space suit would mean instant death and total mission failure? They seem to not care at ALL about getting a tear in their space suit…
@@JA-jx1hk Much of the surface is covered by regolith which while abrasive and troublesome like sand, it's not something that outright tears the suits. If the moon landings were faked, by now there would be incontrovertible evidence as such because so many people want to prove it as a hoax. Instead, all we have is a few people not at all educated in anything to do with space travel or rocket science saying the way the astronauts move "doesn't look right" to them LMFAO. Please.
Joe says he doesn't believe we didn't go to the moon anymore and then proceeds to bring up a dozen weird things that question the landings. It's so frustrating. Just because you don't understand something doesn't mean it didn't happen.
Its a little funny that this guest went from denying the moon landing conspiracy, calling it one of the most ludicrous conspiracies, to then being convinced it was probably fake and the moon landing conspiracy theory is actually true within like 5 minutes of joe "convincing" him
Well he said he had never looked into it. after hearing some facts and looking at some videos ( clearly faked videos) he's thinking "hmm this is clearly bullshit"
Stephan Fry the actor made a great point about the if the moon landings were fake.If so then why did the Soviets not come out and say they were fake even if they knew they were real.They had their missles Aimed at America but they said nothing.The rock samples from the moon the Americans sent to the Soviets as a gesture of good will could confirm to the Soviets that the rocks were real samples from the moon.
The 'rock samples' are easily attained from Antarctica. There are a lot of them there, and they are easy to spot in a blanket of white...and it snows there very little. Also, the 'rock' that was supposedly picked up by one of the astronauts off the surface of the moon, and given to the head of some country, personally, turned out to be petrified wood.
"we lost that kind of technology, we wish we could go back" " We taped over all the video and data records from the moon landing" - NASA scientist talking about going to the moon
I was literally yelling at my phone for him to play that clip..or to talk about them recording over all the original footage of the moon landing. Or the weird way they broadcasted it..by playing on a projector screen first than having a camera record that so it would be way more blurry and hard to see details. There's 1000 other things. But simple stuff like the way they broadcasted it on tv like that really points to hiding shit. There's no other reason to do it that way unless you were trying to hide shit...no other reason. Can you imagine if a guy shot a video of bigfoot today and he swore up and down it was the real deal. He makes a youtube video and he has the video shot in 420p than projected on to a screen than he records that screen with his phone and puts it up on CZcams. Not a sole alive would look at that and be like yup looks lagit.
Oh, yeah. One more thing. If you're wondering why the astronauts are 'bouncing around' and 'springing back up' you might consider the fact that the astronauts were around 180 lbs each, and that their space suits each weighed about 180 lbs as well. (that's Earth weight guys). The Moon has about 1/6th Earth's gravity, meaning that the astronauts and their suits weighed about 60 lbs each on the lunar surface. Since the astronauts were in excellent condition and were therefore only carrying around about 60 lbs (again on the Moon's surface), bouncing back up really wouldn't be that difficult.
I remember being in Creative Writing Class in the 7th grade. It was 1976. It was the first time I had ever heard about a possible moon landing conspiracy from my teacher. He wasn't an advocate but he planted the what if in my mind. I personally don't believe it. I think they went there and some of the scenes were filmed somewhere else like Joe said.😅😅
@andrewgill2561 look I'm not getting into a discussion with some non-entity on CZcams. If you don't where to look to do real research then there's no hope for ya. Bye.
Russia's Belka and Strelka spent a day in space orbit aboard spacecraft 'Korabl-Sputnik 2' on August 19, 1960, before safely returning to Earth. They are the first two dogs ever to fly and survive in outer space. They were accompanied by a grey rabbit, 42 mice, two rats, flies, and several plants and fungi. All passengers survived.
Nasa sent a nagger and a monkey into lower earth orbit back before the fake moon landings. The monkey kept getting orders, instructions, and flight plan corrections which made the nagger feel unimportant,useless, and (of coarse oppressed). So the next time Nasa sent a message the nagger intercepted it and it read as follows. Correct coarse 19 degrees 13 minutes and forty-two seconds, hold coarse for ten minutes 35 seconds then return as programed. Clean air filtering systems and purge your ballistic vaults and jets. P.S feed the nagger
He was able to stand up like that because he was pushing himself with his left hand leaning on the other astronaut. Once you see the hand you can never unsee it :)
Zero-G...Nothin But Net Ride - net force zero Weightlessness In free fall is the complete absence of the sensation of weight, i.e., zero apparent weight. It is also termed zero gravity, zero g-force, or zero-g (named after the g-force of 1G). NIST WTC Towers FAQ 31 - "the upper section came down essentially in free fall"
Neil Armstrong lived in the same town as me…….Lebanon, Ohio. In 1993 I took a front desk job at a professional building in Lebanon. Armstrong had a food company he ran from that building. The VERY FIRST thing I was trained on was to NEVER speak to Neil Armstrong or make eye contact. Armstrong was EXTREMELY reclusive and didn’t want to speak to the public. At the time me and my family thought it was funny. Years later as I learn about the questions on the moon landing my mind went BINGO! I recalled the weirdness around Armstrong and the public and how he demanded to be left alone.
..... but Armstrong was reclusive even before the landings. He was notorious for hating interviews when he was a test pilot and even his teachers and classmates described him as that person that barely talked.
@@kevinskinner4986 I’m sure that’s true, but it went into OD after the moon landings. In fact, watch that press conference the astronauts did after the moon landing! Wow! They ALL acted extremely bizarre!
@@reneesantiago6496 Have you watched the Gemini 8 press conference? Armstrong spends the entire time he's talking fidgeting in his seat like he's sitting on an anthill and describes space flight as one of the most thrilling experiences you can experience in a complete monotone like he's reading from the dictionary. Aldrin's personal life is absolute garbage. His mother lost her battle with depression and committed suicide about a year before the mission and his marriage is falling apart. Aldrin looks angry, and there's a possible reason why that the hoaxers will never, ever tell you. Under the previous mission protocols, Aldrin should have been the first man, not Armstrong. They changed this just a few months before the mission and made excuses why, leading to Aldrin having a big shouting match with them. He's probably still salty about that. Collins mostly looks bored. I caught him stifling yawns like he was going to fall asleep.
@@kevinskinner4986they did not go to the moon, I watched the conference, they could not describe it properly and one said seen stars and other said no stars. They were told to lie.
Great effort is made to prevent people from gaining an individual perspective by which we cannot be divided. The idea of questioning anything has been developed into an extremely effective point of division in fear of accusation that requires repetition to establish a safe zone by which we are not free to think for ourselves in normalized human behavior and acceptance. The concept of conspiracy has been developed beyond its original intent as a legal term regarding a case being adjudicated in court where it has specific meaning to come to a resolution according to the law. In any other context, it serves no value unless the intent is to distract and discredit in fear-based response on a shared basis by which no initiative remains in consideration on an individual basis. Group oriented behavior and identification has been the means by which the evolution of human affairs and events have been managed for as long as we can remember in human history as we know it today. Shared compulsion of fear never needs to be acknowledged by which we then wait for others to take on the responsibility of writing the script going forward, through assumption based upon repetition no longer engaging or requiring the concept of initiative that equates to responsibility for any information or decision making -- an extremely serious evolution lest we regain a grasp on that basis -- when none have a clue who is responsible for so much concern for any serious issue and narrative public or otherwise. The perception of privilege in regard to any information and activity as a part of this process additionally provides much greater access to resources and decisions made, managed no differently than the public through the circulation of information with even less concept of where initiative lay as a part of the process. Much greater potential for deception is then possible than those means by which the public merely need be kept ignorant and occupied. Public programs can serve very well for this purpose as much greater technological developments can remain undisclosed for the benefit and advantage of a relative few, such efforts supported by inside narratives to justify keeping us in the dark as to a great potential that exists for all if such technologies were allowed into the public realm of awareness as well as an expansion of awareness that would occur with the disclosure of a much greater human history as well as past technologies more developed than what we enjoy today and at times a more integrated awareness on a spiritual and energetic basis versus the weaponization of religious perspective of a more arbitrary nature to render humanity in a more media oriented state to establish an outer perspective to describe the inner focus and identity, severely filtered and developing a media oriented mentality and guilt-based -- before the redevelopment of physical technologies for mass communication through print and electronic means that without a doubt have existed in our past . . while requiring anything else to define for us what is real and what makes us acceptable, unaccused and guilt-free, conditioning us to function in a lower compulsive version of ourselves based upon group oriented behavior and identification. The compulsive need for agreement is the source of conflict by which we are not free to think for ourselves, by which we must watch one another and accuse the other side of any point of division -- and by which those who understand the process then support both sides for a longer term outcome in their interest, be it through war and any other form of political, cultural and social crisis that can be created and maintained on that basis. No individual ever started a war of his own initiative. Any example to the contrary requires repetition, rather than comprehension in the context of events and the value of individual perspective. We don't need to love or hate anyone to restore individual sight. The individual perspective is the focus of power by which no person can be set against another with false or self-serving interpretations from another outside of ourselves. Not one thread can be broken, lest individual awareness on an energetic basis of connectivity be restored under ones identity carried from birth. This is the nature of concern for an issue of an old space program using limited technologies that existed at that time in the public awareness. Every aspect of the Apollo program suffers from serious difficulties and discrepancies in the official record, only one of which render the entire program a theater for public consumption. Although near-Earth orbit is real, there are also indications of questionable activity concerning its veracity for some activities as demonstrated, regardless of hardware floating around in space. This is not in any way a denial of programs involving near-Earth orbit rather than specific activities that don't hold up under critical review.
Joe, before it's too late. There are still 4 Apollo astronauts that walked on the moon for you to have on your show as well as the crew of Apollo 8. As of today May 12, 2013, Buzz Aldrin, David Scott, Charles Duke and Harrison Schmitt are still alive. Talk to one of them for God's sake!
The problem is none of these men give interviews about the moon landing. They never have. They only gave the initial press conference after the initial landing and that’s it.
What does Buzz Aldrin do now? Designing rockets, deep sea exploring, speaking all over the world for privatizing space and stimulating support for America's space program. Buzz is as active today as when he walked on the moon. He has written six books and numerous articles advocating concepts for the future of space travel.
Yeah such a humble guy. Scamming people through crypto scams without even bothering to look into what he’s promoting. Just taking his pay then scamming his fans.
There were 14 Apollo missions from 1961 to 1972. 6 missions landed on the moon. 2 other missions were to orbit around the moon and the latter to orbit around the moon and dock and undock from the lander. So they spent 11 years faking 14 missions. Here is how we know the US and the Soviets went to the moon. 1) The Soviets tried to steal the Apollo thunder by landing first, but their rover crashed into the moon a day before. 2) The Soviets landed multiple rovers on the moon with their Luna program. It lives on today with NASA. When the Soviet Union collapsed the Luna scientists were hired by NASA. All the rovers on Mars are the grandchildren of the Soviet Luna program. They even use the same independent 6 wheel design. 3) The most recent theory that the Earth is a 2nd or 3rd generation planet is because of the Apollo and Luna programs. The rocks brought back and studied by scientists over the world show the moon and the Earth share the same chemical makeup. This is only possible due to collision. The latest theory is a smaller planetoid hit the Earth at a high angle. It knocked off the outer crust and made it molten. The Earth had a ring, like Saturn, until the debris reformed as the moon. 4) The European space agency, Chinese, Japanese, Russia and NASA have sent missions to map the moons surface and to identify mineral deposits. ALL of the Apollo landings show up in the pictures.
Yes and I really like that he doesn’t say that he doesn’t believe it but behind closed doors there’s so much more that I would like to talk about with joe Rogan
Oh shut up lol. Is there no end to yhe paranoia of you whackjobs? What's so hard to accept he has changed his mind after becoming better informed?? I hate to admit it but i once believed 911 was 'an inside job', but after some thorough research, it soon became evident there was no truth to any of the conspiracy claims.
@@yassassin6425 are u kidding me? yr so stupid, I literally called it a fairytale, a fucкing bedtime bullshit story, some background sound to fall asleep, and u decided to shine your 58 chromosomes by telling me its a bshit conspiracy and I needa grow up? U needa start learning how to read kid
All I'm gonna say if it genuinely was a plane that killed several people and crashed into the fucking pentagon, one of the most highly secured fucking buildings in the U.S. if not the most secured, there would be more than security footage that has about 3fps consistently and looks nothing like a plane, flies unbelievably low to the ground (In a 747 presumably btw which would have been torn to fucking pieces flying at that speed that low) and 20 years later cant give us any of the footage besides that. They confinscated camera feed from every local place that was in any location even remotely capable of capturing footage of it. How are people not supposed to assume they are feeding us bullshit. They wouldnt be hiding this shit for 20 years waiting for everyone to forget about it. The footage they gave us makes gas station CCTV look like 4k man.
It was 2001. There were no HD cameras or security cameras that were capable of that sort of resolution at that time. Hell, cellular phone cameras were more advanced and that’s simply due to bureaucratic government purchasing and procurement policies. 9/11 helped change ALL of that. Now there’s high res cameras everywhere. It just isn’t the way you’re saying it should’ve been on that day. A commercial jetliner hit the pentagon and did catastrophic damage to the structure. Nearly totally disintegrating the airframe and fuselage of the aircraft and killing 184. Altitude has nothing to do with the aerodynamic forces exerted on the plane. You’ve obviously never seen test footage of a 757 flying fast and low. They don’t just come apart. Wow.
@@marklewen9384 You can say that all you want, doesn't change the reality of the situation. Planes were hijacked by terrorists which crashed into buildings and one in a field. There are literal videos of the planes hitting the buildings, there's recordings of phone calls of people on the plane, there's literal records of all the people on the planes.
@@subswithnovideos-oz4zo there is zero evidence of hijackers. The planes were flown from the ground. No plane hit the pentagon. Even the pilot who Flew the exact plane that supposedly hit the pentagon 300 times said he couldn't hit the pentagon without help from the ground. 19 hijackers who just learned to fly on single engine cessnas COULD NEVER DO IT.
i think Joe has realized that he can't change minds while admitting he believes in it. I don't think he's sold out, but like everyone who's looked in to these things knows, you can't change people's minds if they think you're crazy.
He's talked to enough astronauts to understand that he was just mistaken. Everything in life will always seem "shady" or "weird" if you look into it too much. It's like saying a word too many times; eventually it loses its meaning.
Which is exactly why the powers that ought not be coined the term "conspiracy theorists ". Now when you hear someone being called a conspiracy theorists it automatically discredits them and people think they are nuts! 9 times out of 10 the conspiracy theories are true..
@@jamiesuzanne5781 9 out 10 time the conspiracy freak is either an ignorant clown with a room temp IQ, or a con man like Kaysing, preying on the dimwitted and gullible.
I used to sell autographed Pictures at a Gallery. We had 1 Neil Armstrong that was signed by him. It was more valuable, because Neil was buying them all up before he died. He and the other crew members had many of them signed for their wives , prior to the Mission. It's obvious they never went
@@jeffmiller3499 The US was way to proud to lie about something like this. We went to the moon. The US always took every chance to flex. They had the money and tech, it's easier to say "here's a blank check. get us to the moon before the russians do".
Anton, No, faked them all. When I first looked at this just 5 years ago all the photos were available on nasa;s web site. I read, never went there. year or so later learned they started "re-mastering" all the photos. Used to be you could look at that picture of the stand in that suited up to pose for the picture of buzz and find several objects in back ground. Now the picture has been cropped to just a fraction of the original size but they also relocated the crosses to hide that fact. Used to be able to just turn up saturation and brightness and see the quite clear outlines of buildings complete with doors, trees, autos and trucks in parking lot and ac equip on roof. But a few good videos available that make it clear it was a hoax. Just so sick of all the lies and everybody thinks they so smart cuz they are believers in all the lies. crap. Basically, everything the government wants you to believe is bs. Also the trolls that are all over these comments is another tell. I hear your comment is honest. I know I struggled with this stuff too cuz i was the guy that thought oswald kennedy alone. watch the video funny thing happened on the way to the moon. So I just saw a video this morning where it shows stars clearly vixible through the moon when more than half the moon is black. Then video called this the occluded stars like in the arab star and crescent flags. How did I not know this before. ? She read a quote from somebody back like 1760 or so describing this cuz he couldn't have been fooled by a satellite at least. ha. The truth really does make you free.
Until there is another moon landing, I will remain skeptical about the moon landing. I don't know if they did or didn't land on the moon. Let them do it again.
Nice burn but we have Billionaires that would do it in a second if they could. Going to the moon is one of the few things money can't buy. Think about that.
Hahaha. No there hasn't. There have been ZERO. Next they'll tell you they are going to Mars, ahahaha.. ha. ZERO CHANCE. What did you 'Wiki' it.. That's good cointelpro.. If it's on Google it's true..
All of the passengers from the "plane" that hit the Pentagon were vaporized, but they found bodies of military and civilian accountants who were killed while investigating what happened to the trillions missing from the budget (interesting how the "plane" made an impossible turn, pulling g's a military pilot would have trouble with, to hit that specific part of the building). Oh, and Donald Rumsfeld was on the opposite side of the Pentagon just finishing up some paperwork while being informed that a "commercial aircraft" was headed toward the pentagon (Don't need to run for cover. I'll just chill here because I have an idea of where it's going to hit). His photo op while he was helping "save" some of the victims after the explosion in question is great too. Hahaha. The whole thing reeks to high heaven.
There were some bodies situated at the back of the plane which remained relatively intact. There are first responder accounts of the charred remains of passengers still strapped into their seats, images of which were used in court as evidence during the Moussaoui trial. There was NOTHING "impossible" about the turn Hanjour made as it was a standard manoeuvre used by pilots to reduce altitude. There were no insane levels of G that military pilots wouls struggle with, that's total horsesh!t like everything else you've said. Back up your claims or quit spreading lies. As for Rumsfeld, the Pentagon is THE largest office building on earth so it was quite likely he would be in another part of the building. Such dumb reasoning. For the record, the alleged missing 2.3 trillion was later accounted for, was announced back in 1999 (as opposed to the day before as truthers like to claim) and was never missing in the way truthers say. It was merely a case that they were using computer systems that were incompatible making it extremely difficult to track between departments.
@@dirkdiggler8260 lol. Shut up you shill. You just joined CZcams 4 months ago and you're just spreading misinformation in favor of the federal government to fool the public. All you tell is lies
@brettski I'm sorry but you're talking like this is in question when it isn't. We have public documents proclaiming this missing money from 1999 so anyone stupidly claiming it was announced the day prior in an attempt to cover it up is easily refuted and demonstrably wrong. Why would they bother announcing it at all if it was as truthers claim?? It makes zero sense. Just another half truth, truthers seize upon in another desperate attempt to make the ridiculous conspiracy theories fly.
This is why I like listening to Joe Rogan. Because he realized he didn't know enough about it. And he stopped saying it now. That's what any smart person should do. If you don't know enough about a specific subject. You probably shouldn't go out acting like you know for sure what happened. Bravo to joe I definitely give him a lot of respect super smart guy
Since when does looking into the moon landing equate to being intelligent? This comment in itself is idiotic. Some people don’t have time or simply don’t care about space and what happened in 1969.
@@tyler6971 good point. But the OP is correct overall though. They don't teach you sh*t in school. My little sister thought the Civil War was fought between the American and the British until highschool when they finally decided to put that into curriculum
@@alphanerd7221 Don't you know? After the moon travels NASA ""lost"" the technology and doesn't know how to do it again. Mysteriously it got destroyed, somehow, somewhere, after people started doing questions.
@@GranMaese Yeah that's BS. The did lose the designs for the Saturn 5 but they were never going to build it again. That really isn't any kind of point. It isn't destroyed. The plans are in some filing cabinet in a room full of filing cabinets. It's not like they would have showed them anyway. They are classified. If NASA just never said anything you would have no idea. The questions are stupid. Everyone who isn't dumb knows we went to the moon.
@@alphanerd7221 Damn, you are so nervous and scared, your passive-aggresive attitude demonstrates that. So gullible... They were ""destroyed"" (never existed if you asked me). That's literally the reason they give on why they can't reach it ""anymore"". They are clueless on how to do it ""again"". Everyone who isn't dumb and indoctrinated knows we did not go to the moon.
The one thing that really bugs me is "why was nokia given a contract to install 4G communications tech on the moon NOW when 5G is being rolled out currently and 6G is already well on its way in development?" No ones addressed this at all...
It’s cheaper, simpler, easier to install and they don’t need the main feature of 5G, which is to provide support for much larger numbers of client devices does not apply. Companies want 5G is because they can deliver more data to more customers, faster. Every single cellular increment, from 1G to 5G was an improvement on the carrier’s ability to carry data to customers. They want to host more customers, deliver more data, and go faster. Astronauts don’t need that on the moon, and we aren’t planning to move enough people to warrant a 5G network anytime soon. Its also expensive and requires more infrastructure. Also, because a 5G tower operates on a higher-frequency band, higher frequencies require more power and travel less distance.
Listening to Rogan try to analyze the moon landing is like watching a monkey with a calculator claiming it's fake because it won't turn on his television.
youtube used to have a ton of videos on this subject, now i cant find any of them, except for the ones that say if you dont beleive we landed on the moon then you are a fool
You can thank all of the internet's crazy conspiracy nut jobs for that. Once really dangerous conspiracy theories started becoming a lot more mainstream like anti-vax, qanon, etc. big tech decided to crack down hard on conspiracy theories. Thanks to that there were many innocent casualties like moon landing conspiracies. It's like they say. This is why we can't have nice things. Someone always has to ruin it for everyone else.
@@bestieswithtesties i dont see what is dangerous about different opinions, but i do think coraling us all into thinking and believing the same things and removing any opposing view is super dangerous, communist china levels of bad. i personally know people that are crazy and believe some really bad information, but our society once cherished freedom of speech and free press for all ideas. let the bad information speak for its self and let everyone see just how bad it is, removing opposing ideas only makes those who have power afraid of something, imo thats worse than some of the meth head ideas i hear.
@@jasonbrown467 Because when you disregard facts and reality and replace it with your "opinion" things get extremely dangerous. For example, believing that vaccinations cause autism despite there being no evidence of it. This causes people not to vaccinate their kids which puts both the kid in extreme danger and any kids they come in contact with in danger. Or the crazy qanon conspiracy that has led to real life violence and death. Including the insurrection at the capitol which left 5 dead. It is a simple fact that conspiracy theorists in America, specifically the far right, have gotten completely out of control and they're spreading straight up lies and misinformation that is causing people to take to the streets in the real world and hurt or even kill others because they're so far gone and out of touch with reality. It is a danger to all of society without a doubt. Our country still has free speech. Anyone who complains about private companies not respecting free speech clearly don't understand what free speech even is. All it means is that the government can't arrest you for what you say (with exceptions) it doesn't mean you can just say whatever you want without repercussion from other citizens, your employer or superiors, or privately owned companies. On TOP of that, the people running these websites/companies like youtube and twitter ALSO have the freedom of speech which means they can't be forced to publish things on their platforms that they don't want to. THAT would be unconstitutional.
@@bestieswithtesties you are not being honest with your self if you think the right doesnt feel the same way about the left's propaganda. that is why a healthy compromise is important, or you end up in a civil war. your fact really are just your feelings btw. for example the left feels having open borders will solve all the problems of this country, sure they can spit out some numbers to "prove" their position but its all just feelings and perspective. if we cant even agree to let one said have their opinion and talk openly about it, what does that say about your side? if people think that hitting them selfs in the head with a sledge hammer will cure their disease it is not your right to tell them that they cant even talk about it. dont try to correct me about what free speech is, your team has lost credibility on your understanding the constitution. when a teacher gives a lesson to children about ho evil trump is you claim free speech, when nfl players take a knee, you claim free speech. also social media needs to decide if it is a platform or a publisher. i appreciate your toning down your insults, but i think we should go our separate ways, we cant even agree on how important it is that ideas from both sides should be heard, there no fixing that at right will not submit to your team such a fundamental concept that your team takes for granted with your 4 years of "mostly peaceful" protesting, where lives were lost and billions in property damage occurred
There was literally a CNN reporter walking around the scene right after it happened, and said there was not a single piece of anything that looked like any sort of plane debris in the entire mess.
@@Coopdog1911 I remember this. There was a hole in the pentagon that was smaller than the plane. No wings left outside the building - and no marks on the building where the wings would have hit. The wings just disappeared. The surveillance clip from the gas station across the street conveniently had the frames removed from the video which would have shown what flew past. All we got was a few frames of an approaching shadow, skipped frames, then a few frames of a fireball then it cuts
Just a suggestion - but it's always an idea to familiarise yourself with at best, the very basics of a subject before you declare it fake. Firstly, they are belts, since there are two, with a third that is transitory. Secondly, "like ten hours" - what on Earth are you talking about? Thirdly, if you really feel the need to continue this exchange, consider the following. If you have a shred of integrity the I'd like you to honestly ask yourself the following questions. 1/ How much do I genuinely know about the Van Allen Belts? - their shape extent and distribution? Energies and intensity? Type of radiation? 2/ What do I actually understand by alpha and beta particle radiation and shielding against it? 3/ What have I understood about the actual structure of the Command Module and the materials that it was fashioned from? 4/ What have I learnt about the trajectories flown by each of the Apollo missions and their passage through the belts? 5/ What do I know about what James Van Allen himself have to say about the belts and the Apollo missions? If the answer to these questions is nothing, then obtaining the answers first will prevent you form humiliating yourself in the future and avoid making such a dumb and ignorant statement on a public comments section with no actual prior knowledge about the subject.
POINT... they did not fly 35mm film and 16mm movie film through a radiation belt... of any kind considering you cannot even put film thru an X-ray machine at the airport and safely get properly exposed film.
@@chadkbrignall22 So chose not to exercise any humility or heed my advice and arrogantly continue to post nonsense about a subject that you clearly have zero understanding of whatsoever. Do you understand what charged particle radiation is? Why are you mentioning X rays? Why are you doing this to yourself?
@Ned Simlish im not agreeing or denying anything. Im just saying that if I weighed like 15kg instead of the 60 I actually weigh, i could probably pull that off. It could still be fake tho
@Ned Simlish also we weren’t there so we don’t know what actually happened. For all we know they could’ve stayed home that day or they could’ve gone to the moon and back twice. They could’ve even gone at the ISS for a beer and then came back down. Only they know what actually happened and unfortunately everything we’re left with are theories and speculations :/
Is he not pushing up with his right hand? Impossible on earth, but it seems plausible your tricep could do the job if you are strong and in low gravity.
A whole 11 years later… I was playing pong on an Atari 2600. Yes, a wooden console. And you’re telling me that they landed on the moon 11 years earlier? 😂😂😂😂😂
The conversation is such a non-conversation. As one knows, it's not even worth contributing to the diatribe. Moon landing deniers - without realising it - are treated with just as much disdain as "Flat Earthers" are to the academical world. Dunning-Kruger syndrome...
If they did show simulations and passed them off as the real thing...my next question would be why/how would you make a simulation to look exactly like space including the black background? Why go for over the top realism unless they were purposely trying to pull one over. I've seen some of the tests and simulations and they didn't bother making it look like it was in space. I'm with Joe, I'm not convinced either way but something squirly was going on. You know how you can be certain shady business was going on? Government was involved.
Great effort is made to prevent people from gaining an individual perspective by which we cannot be divided. The idea of questioning anything has been developed into an extremely effective point of division in fear of accusation that requires repetition to establish a safe zone by which we are not free to think for ourselves in normalized human behavior and acceptance. The concept of conspiracy has been developed beyond its original intent as a legal term regarding a case being adjudicated in court where it has specific meaning to come to a resolution according to the law. In any other context, it serves no value unless the intent is to distract and discredit in fear-based response on a shared basis by which no initiative remains in consideration on an individual basis. Group oriented behavior and identification has been the means by which the evolution of human affairs and events have been managed for as long as we can remember in human history as we know it today. Shared compulsion of fear never needs to be acknowledged by which we then wait for others to take on the responsibility of writing the script going forward, through assumption based upon repetition no longer engaging or requiring the concept of initiative that equates to responsibility for any information or decision making -- an extremely serious evolution lest we regain a grasp on that basis -- when none have a clue who is responsible for so much concern for any serious issue and narrative public or otherwise. The perception of privilege in regard to any information and activity as a part of this process additionally provides much greater access to resources and decisions made, managed no differently than the public through the circulation of information with even less concept of where initiative lay as a part of the process. Much greater potential for deception is then possible than those means by which the public merely need be kept ignorant and occupied. Public programs can serve very well for this purpose as much greater technological developments can remain undisclosed for the benefit and advantage of a relative few, such efforts supported by inside narratives to justify keeping us in the dark as to a great potential that exists for all if such technologies were allowed into the public realm of awareness as well as an expansion of awareness that would occur with the disclosure of a much greater human history as well as past technologies more developed than what we enjoy today and at times a more integrated awareness on a spiritual and energetic basis versus the weaponization of religious perspective of a more arbitrary nature to render humanity in a more media oriented state to establish an outer perspective to describe the inner focus and identity, severely filtered and developing a media oriented mentality and guilt-based -- before the redevelopment of physical technologies for mass communication through print and electronic means that without a doubt have existed in our past . . while requiring anything else to define for us what is real and what makes us acceptable, unaccused and guilt-free, conditioning us to function in a lower compulsive version of ourselves based upon group oriented behavior and identification. The compulsive need for agreement is the source of conflict by which we are not free to think for ourselves, by which we must watch one another and accuse the other side of any point of division -- and by which those who understand the process then support both sides for a longer term outcome in their interest, be it through war and any other form of political, cultural and social crisis that can be created and maintained on that basis. No individual ever started a war of his own initiative. Any example to the contrary requires repetition, rather than comprehension in the context of events and the value of individual perspective. We don't need to love or hate anyone to restore individual sight. The individual perspective is the focus of power by which no person can be set against another with false or self-serving interpretations from another outside of ourselves. Not one thread can be broken, lest individual awareness on an energetic basis of connectivity be restored under ones identity carried from birth. This is the nature of concern for an issue of an old space program using limited technologies that existed at that time in the public awareness. Every aspect of the Apollo program suffers from serious difficulties and discrepancies in the official record, only one of which render the entire program a theater for public consumption. Although near-Earth orbit is real, there are also indications of questionable activity concerning its veracity for some activities as demonstrated, regardless of hardware floating around in space. This is not in any way a denial of programs involving near-Earth orbit rather than specific activities that don't hold up under critical review.
The conspiracy is not that they didn't go to the moon. The conspiracy is that they have been to the moon. Exactly like the globe model. Conspiracy is that they said it is a globe. Not that the earth is flat and motionless. Like Einstein said " there is not even one experiment that can detect the motion of the earth".
It's pretty simple, cost vs reward of going to the moon is a very one sided story. If there were potential habitable areas or valuable assets there, we would have colonized and or strip mined it by now. As far as the argument of the technology differences of then to now only reflects progress. Does anyone remember seeing photos of the first contraptions people were trying to take flight with? Now compare that with a SR-71. If those first guys hadn't tried, the latter wouldn't exist. It's always trial by fire when attempting such phenomenal new feats. So the first missions to the moon were indeed extremely risky (especially by today's standards) but they were the first steps in seeing how far we could go. While I will agree somethings do seem out of place with the moon landing, (but what hasn't had things out of place when a government is behind the wheel) the fact that we now certainly have the technology to get people there and back but don't, leads me to believe they had seen what they needed to see and the results didn't yield a worth while reward to merit continued expeditions. And yes, a lot of scientists and engineers of that time were plucked from Nazi Germany. Now the video showing the guy standing up after falling, if you look his right hand is down as well as his right knee. His left hand appears to be holding onto the standing astronaut. Standing up from that position in 1/6 gravity using your right knee and hand to push off of the surface and your left hand pulling down on the other astronaut, wouldn't be that big of a grasp.
Lmao yea dude sure it’s not like don Pettit made an entire Ted talk about why the moon would be of ultimate scientific importance. Stop lying to yourself in order to just go along with what the elites that hate us want us to think. We didn’t go and it’s the most logical conclusion we can come to seeing the modern state of nasa and what happened after the “moon landings”.
@@JA-jx1hk When you read a posted reply that begins with LMAO, you just know you're in for a wealth of well thought out statements, arguments and fact.... (FART SOUND).....
And dude!!! That press conference he literally said we didn't break the atmosphere! Now you've got me thinking that there is no robots outside orbit either
G.Gorrell what are you talking about it's proof the twin towers were engineered for an impact frrom a full size jet linear. Because of the plane that crashed into the new York skyline in the early 1920s
Definitely intervention of some kind. There's molten steel pouring out of the sides of the building before the towers fell. Joe has his 3 that he'll bring up: moon landing, northwoods, gulf of tanken. There is so much evidence of foul play in 911 but he always treats that as nuts. There is more evidence there than the moon landing that's for sure
Joe understands that he can't be 100% honest on how he feels about certain subjects because it could cost him potential jobs in mainstream media. Smart on his part, still a little disappointing nonetheless
He sold out when he was saying shit like "Bernie Sanders has insane beliefs about wealth..." like what.. that it should be used to make the world a better place for everyone and not just a dreamland for a select few? Fuck Joe Rogan I hope someone shivs him in the throat. Along with all these other shill fucks and sellout politicians... then move on to all the god damn rich 1% assholes who, last year, made over 80% of all the income in the world. There is no need for it. They are hurting people, killing people, and they don't care. They will not stop until they have anything and if we wait too long we aren't going to even have the strength to fight back at all. Which is what they are counting on... boil a frog slowly and what not.
HHstutz55 it's sad how people can't see this! Clear as day if your not brainwashed. I have listened to 90 percent of all joe's podcasts and definitely see what you see.
ScoutFighter #1 Sad that people can't see he will say anything to keep his luxurious life? What's actually sad is you don't realize that we do see it and that is exactly the fucking problem.
"truths protective layers" is referring to the Scientific pursuit of the answers of how things work. Science generally makes discoveries in a piece by piece or layered way. Going to the moon wasn't send a rocket to the moon, it was a step by step process or uncovering the final answer a layer at a time.
Exactly. But some people see a conspiracies in their coffee. In the CZcams Age, everybody and anybody gets to say whatever crap clogs their heads and spit out. Include me in.
I think he still believes that they faked it and no human ever touched the moon, but he realized that it's silly to say it publicly. Because there are way too many people who believe it and will call him ignorant and whatnot.
The weirdest thing I have read is that after leaving Earth atmosphere the astronauts would have this 'hallucinations' is the best way to describe it. Apparently Buzz Aldrin was the one who talked about it.
If the landing never really happened, then why didnt we hear anything like that from the Soviets? Weren't they following the whole thing live?? They wouldn't have missed the chance to pick up on that
It baffles me that people think the most egocentric, ambitious and fraudulent nation in the hole world once went to the moon with that shit ass spacecraft
No one ever told me that Santa and the Easter bunny were real. They are simply popularised imaginary characters fed to infantile mentalities, much like the junk online conspiracy theorists that tell you what to think. And who precisely are 'they'?
The equipment we used to get to the moon used old processes. The basic blueprints aren't enough either because the engineers had their notes to make improvements and most of it is unreadable to everybody else. We have to use new processes, retest everything and design everything from scratch using modern processes
this is entirely false. no space exploration “notes” are lost to unreadable scriptures. everything was definitely documented and shared between scientists and engineers.
They’re selling books that’s been translated a zillion times claiming it’s the actual word of god that we are still reading today but we can’t read the notes of the Americans from 1969? 🤔
If the Hubble space telescope can take pictures of galaxies thousands of lightyears away, why couldn't it take a simple shot of our lunar lander left on the moon?
I think you’ll find that telescope is designed for long distance photography and if it were to take a shot like that of the moon it would just be a blurry mess. Same is true for any camera I suppose, I’m no photographer that’s for sure but the principle of it..
It wouldn’t matter because there would STILL be idiots who would claim the Hubble Moon images were faked. I sleep just fine knowing the moon landings happened, and that they happened exactly as documented. Thousands of highly educated people were tasked by the Kennedy administration to put a man on the moon by the end of the 1960’s and by damn, they did it. And they did it again and again, well into the 1970’s. Going back there is prohibitively expensive, even with cheaper, faster computers and rocket tech. We’ve been there, done that, on to the next…
the astronaut standing up looked perfectly normal to me, his left arm is leaning on the other astronaut, and all he had to do was lift 60 lbs in reduced gravity if he was about 180lbs + the 180lbs space suit
Joe sits on the fence to be liked not because he isn't biased.. He is very bias on a lot of subjects. He just doesn't want to come off as a conspiracy theorist because he likes the idea of coming off as a "intellectual" and of course he gets more views which makes more money if he plays the intellectual.
Iz G Maybe so..He aint perfect..we all flip on things..Best to look from all forms to form the best opin on things..butt no ones perfect..but i here ya..
This guy looks like an ancient Greek statue
This guy got knocked out by jake paul
Oh I know which one you're talking about....the guy with the small pee pee?
why y’all hating on ben askren
Hahaha hahaha
@@someguy6367 Its all jokes man
Still blown away that Joe was able to get Socrates to come on the podcast.
Underrated comment
😂
😂😂😂😂
Ben does look like a greek god😂
Isn't he David?
My uncle was stationed in the pentagon on 911, his office was in the wing that was hit. He told me the wing was under maintenance and was empty when it was hit. He was in an outside office building when it happened. Sus.
why is it sus; E-Wedge was being rebuilt for years before 911. I spent a year in there prior to 911 putting up steel for new mechanical towers and elevator shafts
Sus is what actually hit the Pentagon.
They knew they what they were gonna do years and years ahead. They always have a plan far ahead of when it happens…
So much irrefutable evidence against a plane hitting the Pentagon. Several videos showing footage of a cruise missile flying towards the Pentagon on the day. The engine at the "crash" site was the wrong type for the plane that supposedly hit it. Every expert pilot ever interviewed about it saying it was completely impossible to fly a plane that low and not hit any of the lampposts on the way in. A complete la la fantasy.
Oh ya my uncle was special forces and had to register his hands as deadly weapons
One incredible thing was they were able to do a live broadcasting of the first moon landing in 1969.
It's not that incredible considering the broadcast was 325 lines at 10fps. Radio waves travel perpetually in space, so the 234,000 miles is nothing compared to Voyager 1's 14 billion miles, which is still broadcasting a signal back to Earth but with a 22+ hr delay. The delay from the moon and back is only 1.33 seconds.
@@efficiencyinavan for some reason I can’t get service in my master bedroom
@@pumaraebon80 Different radio frequencies and amplitudes. The signal from the moon was very low frequency and very high amplitude. Many times greater than the weak signal we get to our phones. You can complain to your service provider and they will be more likely to install a tower closer to your house, which may be more exposed to your master bedroom.
@@efficiencyinavanYeah but that just makes it all the easier to fake. Easy explanations and answers for the people. Why spend 26 bill creating a mission that might fail miserably and embarrass your nation in a time of competition, when you can spend 1 Bill or less just faking it.
@@efficiencyinavando radio waves need an atmosphere to travel ?
Joe “ I was balls deep in this stuff for years” rogan
:)) best comment
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 GOLD
OMG I just died! That is definitely the best comment ever
The only thing I'm balls deep in is some juicy hot box
When he pulled out his balls got ripped off.
Joe's ability to know AND acknowledge that sometimes he doesn't know what he's talking about is something so many more people could use.
No, he's pure Dunning-Kruger
@@SovereignStatesman Dude assessed his own level of knowledge as mostly ignorant - shit, dunning-kruger means he must be one of the smart ones...
And he's the guy that people paint as conspiracy peddling fascist. Can't be admitting gaps in your knowledge - pick a side and stand up for it!!!
Joe probably has either been blackmailed or has taken the blue pill, either one is bad.
As well as a more comprehensive education and the ability to think critically.
You’re telling me that we had the technology back in the 60s and 70s. Then lost all technology we used and have never been back since. We’ve never left the atmosphere!!
Right… and NASA recorded over the first man to ever walk on the moon to “save space”. 😅 Give me a break.
Yes
The only thing they landed on was our heads😂
Is it so hard for your small brain to understand that it was incredibly expensive and there is no such benefit from going to the moon that would cover these expenses? Is it so hard for you or you just pathetic troll?
That feeling you get when you realize all the cold war was was American Nazis vs. Soviet Nazis...
our german scientists are better than, your german scientists, 😅
the way you say it has a better ring to it!!! 👊🏽😎
@CONTROL-Z nazis scientist getting america to the moon vs nazis scientist first reaching the space
Yup
That exchange was Operation Paperclip.
Sonsabitches
Well said
The cold war was more than just the space race 🤦
It's easier to fool intelligent people than it is to convince intelligent people they've been fooled.
A month later and still not a reference to the quote. I'll help you, Mark Twain.
@@pawpaw__ huh
@@gabeprice3333mark twain said the quote
@@spanningbread lol I know. I was just being dumb
@@gabeprice3333 i see, was just tryna help lol
When the government has to put a contextual link on a Joe Rogan video, you know what’s up
Did anyone else notice the thing that fell off the astronauts back pack at 16:50 it fell way faster than the astronauts do.
Shit was super fake
Nothing fell off his pack, that was his left foot.
@@UpperDarbyDetailing look again behind him. something definitely fell onto the ground.
@@muleunit yeah.. like I said. It was his left foot kicking the regolith. Just some “dirt”.
‘There are people who think satellites and dinosaurs are fake’. Joe was 100% talking about Eddie there haha
Eddie is an absolute idiot. I cant even listen to him talk without ending the videos early. So cringey
@@andrewderringer3765 eddie would still put u in coma
@@javiii8337 No refute there. But his brain leads me to believe he's already in one
@@andrewderringer3765 eddie is right on many things, flat earth is not one of them.
@@javiii8337 sorry flat earth is absolutely one of them. Eddie is a fucking idiot but that doesn't discredit that the earth is flat. There's way too many government documents that admit it's flat, no curvature measured... Boats don't go over a curve when you can zoom in with a camera and they come back into view. This was the biggest round earth defense for centuries and now anyone with a camera with decent zoom can prove it wrong but nobody cares cuz they're all brainwashed like you bro. You see where Joe Rogan talks with others about flat earth, just says there all stupid and retarded over and over but no science to back his shit... Your god Joe Rogan wants you to feel retarded if you even question the globe, the dumb pos sold his soul to the devil long ago, uses his all seeing eye symbol as well. Idiots gather in giant crowds, turns out Joe has a bigger crowd than CNN. Y'all are fucking idiots and fell for the trump scam too lol
Ben seems like a genuine guy. He actually listens to Rogans conspiracies and considers them. Offering more than hysteria.
he got knocked aht by jake paul lol
7:00 lmao what a load of bullshit, talk about believing in stupid conspiracies.
They probably locked them in a cage with a bear and and eagle when they caught them stuffing diamonds inside their lower end 😂😂😂
@@alainportant6412 took me about 5 minutes to confirm this “conspiracy”… Von Braun used prisoners from the Dora-Mittelbau concentration camp for labor. They were regularly worked to death and publicly executed
Hysteria?
@@Pvtpob
That's fake. You probably used google which is jewish owned, thats why
Yeah, we went to the moon, 55 years ago, and I can't get wi fi in my basement.
Seriously? Again? What on Earth does your inability to understand a weak 2.4 - 5 GHz signal from a router to your device have to do with the Apollo Programme? Incidentally, the last manned lunar landing was 52 years ago, not 55.
Can I suggest that you leave your basement periodically? - and not simply in the interest of your wi fi signal.
Perhaps leaving your basement would do you some favors.
Its not the same people who built the wifi😂
“ That’s no moon....it’s a space station “ - Ben Kenobi
If ur not with me then ur my enemy
@@xtravugant4245”You were the chosen one!, it’s said that you would destroy the Sith not join them!”
I’m telling you, Joe, that was a tomahawk cruise missile, the hole was not even big enough for a fuselage. There was no wings no engines no seats no luggage just tomahawk cruise missile pieces.
No bodies either.
No sign of burn on the grass, it came in low. Also I was watching this live and Jamie McIntyre with CNN was interviewing someone at the Pentagon and he raced around the building with his cameraman and there was NO debris whatsoever. Tiny hole and no damage from the wings. This makes me so mad. And what they did to Jamie.
@@solamano7239Watch SEPTEMBER 11 THE NEW PEARL HARBOR
Before CZcams removes it again
I cant believe the amount of times I've heard Joe explain operation paperclip and that theres still people who have never heard about it. I learned about it when I was like 9 years old only cause I was interested in WW2 massively at the age. But just goes to show, you dont even need to be into conspiracies to have heard about it lol.
The reason it isn’t taught is because that’s something the US doesn’t want people to know. They want us to believe everything made and done was by Americans. What good is it if the greatest feat by mankind was aided by Nazis
@@97NikeSb Very true!
@@koreywilliams8418 that’s why I find it hilarious the fake moon landing conspiracy theorists always leave out the fact we even got to the moon was because Nazis helped us out and USSR Nazis backed it up that we landed on the moon lol
@@97NikeSb
That's because nobody has ever gone to the moon, smart guy !
You should watch the video where the head guy at NASA says that we haven't gone back to the moon because we don't have the technology. You could ask to see the video footage of the moon landing that according to NASA was recorded over and that they habe absolutely no footage, pictures, voice recordings.
You can watch them grab wires when they are supposedly on the spaceship floating in space.
Go watch the valuetainment podcast with the dude who has footage that says "Do not release to public" and basically proves that it is bullshit.
You do absolutely no research, fill in the blank parts of a story with your imagination and believe it to be 100% facts.
I didn't know about operation paperclip until I was in my early 20s. I definitely didn't learn about it in school.
I love how homeboy in the pink shirt says the moon landing hoax is so laughable and then admits he never even looked into it. Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance. Unfortunately, more people are like him than not. People say the education system in America has failed us. I say it's succeeded. The leaders of this country, whoever they may be, do not want intelligent critical thinking citizens.
I did look into it ,thats what makes it so laughable.
@@stevekon11 👌
Ben Askren is one of the smartest people I’ve seen on JRE not even kidding lol
@@patstaysuckafreeboss8006 I agree. I made this comment 4 years ago and it cracks me up today. I've become a giant MMA fan in the past 2 and a half years and I like Ben Askren. It's great to see evidence of me not knowing who he is once. I still don't agree with him here and I'm slightly disappointed that he would be so wilfully ignorant but regardless I still like the guy.
Lol keep being a sheep bro 😂 the government green screened the fuck out of America and most of u fell for it 😂
Joe - talk to architects for 9/11 and discuss just building 7.
Joe , please don't mention dr judy wood. "Where did the towers go? "
Watch SEPTEMBER 11 THE NEW PEARL HARBOR
Joe’s been told the rules, now he won’t touch it, he used to be a moon landing skeptic but….now he plays within the rules
I am a believer in the Mars missions. But I heard an anecdotal story. There was a visitor to JPL. He was watching the monitor with a view of Mars. Suddenly a a man wearing a shirt walked into view and left. Suddenly an Employee of JPL got up an stepped in front of the monitor.
This old podcast's are more interesting to watch then the new ones
Just thinking that bro
I disagree, you just have nostalgia
Tons of interesting guests since then, you just gotta pick and choice. I skip all the MMA live shows, and I only watch the comedian guests when I want pure laughs and bs.
@@ActionJackson669 joe was a lot more relaxed then and he actually had civil arguements and would go at people when they were false. Now he agrees with every single body that goes on.
No I used to wonder about the same thing but in reality there's just so many episodes that the interesting ones become more scarce.
When he only had so many episodes it made the 2 with Alex Jones, the alien shit, Elon Musk and conspiracy episodes etc more common. Now the 3rd time around with Alex etc is surrounded with 1500 plain podcasts.
Operation "Joe Rogan" Northwoods
"We're whalers on the moon! We carry a harpoon!....."
Fuel to go to the moon which is 260,000 miles into deep space? Can't do it since 1972? Nah, they didn't go to the moon.
It doesn’t take much fuel. When the Apollo modules orbited earth and then slingshotted out of orbit, there speed was approximately 24,000 mph.
Watch ASTRONAUTS GONE WILD
joe "show me the ufos and il lie about it for the rest of my life" rogen
Sonic Spange this deserves more thumbs up
wouldn't that mean he saw ufos????????
@Jesus Was Antifa Thats not the long form word lmao. Its unidentified flying opject, that doesnt mean they hard confirmed aliens
@@NeutralGuyDoubleZero the gov are the aliens
@@anylastwordspod Lol
Describing scientific breakthroughs as “removing truth’s protective layers” is actually quite beautiful prose.
but the clowns will gobble up the story if it's sold as "cryptic" and "potential giving out"
@@madlad4206 Tough talk for a man with a small cock.
I didnt find it cryptic or odd at all
Well Rogan didn't understand it. Therefore there MUST be a conspiracy !!!! Too funny
NASA is the protective layer to the truth. In 2007, when Google announced a 34 million dollar reward* for any private organization to send a rover to the Moon and live broadcast the Apollo landing sites, why do you think NASA immediately made the landing zones a restricted area? Do you really think it was to "preserve history"? No, they were more likely protecting the truth.
*30m for landing on Moon, and an additional 4m for live recording the Apollo landing sites.
Kubrick should get the biggest Oscar for 'Moon Landing' movie.
You mean 2001: A Space Odyssey? He did.
2001 A space oddesy looks like shit compared to the apollo footage. Im tierd of people saying Kubrick did it when there is actually no way of "faking" it. how can you drive for miles non stop in a studio for example? xd
@@sledstorm4703I think this guy is joking but some others aren't.
I have always been a skeptic man walked on the moon. What I find perplexing is why would the astronauts comment on UFOs on the moon's surface observing them. Those types of comments would not be necessary, unless they were actually on the moon's surface.
What they mean is aliens were watching them, we were watching them, we are an alien hybrid but,,, aliens are not living breathing beings they are spirits
In 10 mins Joe blew Ben's mind out his head and he went from saying "the moon landing conspiracy is the most bs" to saying "that's definitely faked I can see the strings" 😂😂😂
dude knew how gravity would work on the human body if it were on the moon within seconds lol
because mma
@@jdstox1 Exactly, these guys are at the same time admitting that the moon's gravity is much less than earth's but then refusing to acknowledge that what they are seeing is the obvious result of that. My mind is hurting from watching this, and I actually like Rogan.
Yea the result is too obvious. The moon landing is fake you just need to accept it already. Get over it. You guys don’t think it’s weird that these dudes would be bouncing around and literally rolling in jagged moon rocks when the slightest cut on your space suit would mean instant death and total mission failure? They seem to not care at ALL about getting a tear in their space suit…
@@JA-jx1hk Much of the surface is covered by regolith which while abrasive and troublesome like sand, it's not something that outright tears the suits. If the moon landings were faked, by now there would be incontrovertible evidence as such because so many people want to prove it as a hoax. Instead, all we have is a few people not at all educated in anything to do with space travel or rocket science saying the way the astronauts move "doesn't look right" to them LMFAO. Please.
The conspiracy isn’t that we didn’t go to the moon. It’s that we never left
Real Gang 👀👀👀👀👀 I'm to high for this 😂
Sweet
It means there's been a secret space outpost on the moon since the '60s. Keep up with conversation, or you can sit at the kids table.
We all in da matrix
Daniel Joyce
I wipe before i poop
“Why risk human lives, that’s like.. retro” 💀🤣
I’m here for it my guy
What a what?
Joe says he doesn't believe we didn't go to the moon anymore and then proceeds to bring up a dozen weird things that question the landings. It's so frustrating. Just because you don't understand something doesn't mean it didn't happen.
Joe “fear is a factor for me” rogan
Douglas Cameron lol with his hair
Joe “I say whatever doesn’t offend my guest” rogan
😬😮😬😮 Blasphemy!!
I started that and now everyone is doing it
@@devildog8427 yea cool story bro 🙄
Its a little funny that this guest went from denying the moon landing conspiracy, calling it one of the most ludicrous conspiracies, to then being convinced it was probably fake and the moon landing conspiracy theory is actually true within like 5 minutes of joe "convincing" him
Joe is a super passive-aggressive kettle-bell-strong jew-jitsu-shill supreme..
Well he said he had never looked into it. after hearing some facts and looking at some videos ( clearly faked videos) he's thinking "hmm this is clearly bullshit"
Well its no rocket science lmao
that demonstrates perfectly how people easily fall for this kind of bullshit
@@dorjedradul9805 Jew jit su lol
Stephan Fry the actor made a great point about the if the moon landings were fake.If so then why did the Soviets not come out and say they were fake even if they knew they were real.They had their missles Aimed at America but they said nothing.The rock samples from the moon the Americans sent to the Soviets as a gesture of good will could confirm to the Soviets that the rocks were real samples from the moon.
The 'rock samples' are easily attained from Antarctica. There are a lot of them there, and they are easy to spot in a blanket of white...and it snows there very little.
Also, the 'rock' that was supposedly picked up by one of the astronauts off the surface of the moon, and given to the head of some country, personally, turned out to be petrified wood.
If the moon landing didn’t happen, what’s with the voice recording of Neil being like “they’re here”
hahaha good one
"we lost that kind of technology, we wish we could go back"
" We taped over all the video and data records from the moon landing"
- NASA scientist talking about going to the moon
I was literally yelling at my phone for him to play that clip..or to talk about them recording over all the original footage of the moon landing. Or the weird way they broadcasted it..by playing on a projector screen first than having a camera record that so it would be way more blurry and hard to see details. There's 1000 other things. But simple stuff like the way they broadcasted it on tv like that really points to hiding shit. There's no other reason to do it that way unless you were trying to hide shit...no other reason. Can you imagine if a guy shot a video of bigfoot today and he swore up and down it was the real deal. He makes a youtube video and he has the video shot in 420p than projected on to a screen than he records that screen with his phone and puts it up on CZcams. Not a sole alive would look at that and be like yup looks lagit.
@@wickedliquid1177
Not today but 50 years ago?
We never went to the moon
@@wickedliquid1177 pics or it didn't happen
czcams.com/video/TFqCRd-6JQY/video.html
"I aimed for the moon, but sometimes I hit London" - Werner Von B
🤣
Great American hero 😂 w Von B
‘What the fuck was that?’ - Mayor of Hiroshima
Oh, yeah. One more thing. If you're wondering why the astronauts are 'bouncing around' and 'springing back up' you might consider the fact that the astronauts were around 180 lbs each, and that their space suits each weighed about 180 lbs as well. (that's Earth weight guys). The Moon has about 1/6th Earth's gravity, meaning that the astronauts and their suits weighed about 60 lbs each on the lunar surface.
Since the astronauts were in excellent condition and were therefore only carrying around about 60 lbs (again on the Moon's surface), bouncing back up really wouldn't be that difficult.
Try to do what he did in a swimming pool
I remember being in Creative Writing Class in the 7th grade. It was 1976. It was the first time I had ever heard about a possible moon landing conspiracy from my teacher. He wasn't an advocate but he planted the what if in my mind. I personally don't believe it. I think they went there and some of the scenes were filmed somewhere else like Joe said.😅😅
Well they did go there
@@edbeasant9494 can you prove that without a shadow of a doubt?
@@andrewgill2561 it's already been proven
@@edbeasant9494 how and by who?
@andrewgill2561 look I'm not getting into a discussion with some non-entity on CZcams. If you don't where to look to do real research then there's no hope for ya. Bye.
Russia's Belka and Strelka spent a day in space orbit aboard spacecraft 'Korabl-Sputnik 2' on August 19, 1960, before safely returning to Earth. They are the first two dogs ever to fly and survive in outer space. They were accompanied by a grey rabbit, 42 mice, two rats, flies, and several plants and fungi. All passengers survived.
Nasa sent a nagger and a monkey into lower earth orbit back before the fake moon landings. The monkey kept getting orders, instructions, and flight plan corrections which made the nagger feel unimportant,useless, and (of coarse oppressed). So the next time Nasa sent a message the nagger intercepted it and it read as follows. Correct coarse 19 degrees 13 minutes and forty-two seconds, hold coarse for ten minutes 35 seconds then return as programed. Clean air filtering systems and purge your ballistic vaults and jets. P.S feed the nagger
Considering the fact that the Moon lander was made out of popsicle sticks and tinfoil makes it even more incredible.
not to mention it was sealed by the most powerful device suited for space travel: duct tape
😂
That's what really did it for me. The fact it looks like some cheap prop used on an episode of twilight zone.
Did you hear Artemis flight was canceled due to a leak? This was supposed to be our return to the moon
@@teekaybe4016NASA is back in the money faking business...
He was able to stand up like that because he was pushing himself with his left hand leaning on the other astronaut. Once you see the hand you can never unsee it :)
Zero-G...Nothin But Net Ride - net force zero
Weightlessness In free fall is the complete absence of the sensation of weight, i.e., zero apparent weight. It is also termed zero gravity, zero g-force, or zero-g (named after the g-force of 1G).
NIST WTC Towers FAQ 31 - "the upper section came down essentially in free fall"
Neil Armstrong lived in the same town as me…….Lebanon, Ohio. In 1993 I took a front desk job at a professional building in Lebanon. Armstrong had a food company he ran from that building. The VERY FIRST thing I was trained on was to NEVER speak to Neil Armstrong or make eye contact. Armstrong was EXTREMELY reclusive and didn’t want to speak to the public. At the time me and my family thought it was funny. Years later as I learn about the questions on the moon landing my mind went BINGO! I recalled the weirdness around Armstrong and the public and how he demanded to be left alone.
..... but Armstrong was reclusive even before the landings. He was notorious for hating interviews when he was a test pilot and even his teachers and classmates described him as that person that barely talked.
@@kevinskinner4986 I’m sure that’s true, but it went into OD after the moon landings. In fact, watch that press conference the astronauts did after the moon landing! Wow! They ALL acted extremely bizarre!
@@reneesantiago6496 Have you watched the Gemini 8 press conference? Armstrong spends the entire time he's talking fidgeting in his seat like he's sitting on an anthill and describes space flight as one of the most thrilling experiences you can experience in a complete monotone like he's reading from the dictionary.
Aldrin's personal life is absolute garbage. His mother lost her battle with depression and committed suicide about a year before the mission and his marriage is falling apart.
Aldrin looks angry, and there's a possible reason why that the hoaxers will never, ever tell you.
Under the previous mission protocols, Aldrin should have been the first man, not Armstrong. They changed this just a few months before the mission and made excuses why, leading to Aldrin having a big shouting match with them. He's probably still salty about that.
Collins mostly looks bored. I caught him stifling yawns like he was going to fall asleep.
@@kevinskinner4986they did not go to the moon, I watched the conference, they could not describe it properly and one said seen stars and other said no stars. They were told to lie.
Great effort is made to prevent people from gaining an individual perspective by which we cannot be divided. The idea of questioning anything has been developed into an extremely effective point of division in fear of accusation that requires repetition to establish a safe zone by which we are not free to think for ourselves in normalized human behavior and acceptance. The concept of conspiracy has been developed beyond its original intent as a legal term regarding a case being adjudicated in court where it has specific meaning to come to a resolution according to the law. In any other context, it serves no value unless the intent is to distract and discredit in fear-based response on a shared basis by which no initiative remains in consideration on an individual basis. Group oriented behavior and identification has been the means by which the evolution of human affairs and events have been managed for as long as we can remember in human history as we know it today.
Shared compulsion of fear never needs to be acknowledged by which we then wait for others to take on the responsibility of writing the script going forward, through assumption based upon repetition no longer engaging or requiring the concept of initiative that equates to responsibility for any information or decision making -- an extremely serious evolution lest we regain a grasp on that basis -- when none have a clue who is responsible for so much concern for any serious issue and narrative public or otherwise. The perception of privilege in regard to any information and activity as a part of this process additionally provides much greater access to resources and decisions made, managed no differently than the public through the circulation of information with even less concept of where initiative lay as a part of the process. Much greater potential for deception is then possible than those means by which the public merely need be kept ignorant and occupied. Public programs can serve very well for this purpose as much greater technological developments can remain undisclosed for the benefit and advantage of a relative few, such efforts supported by inside narratives to justify keeping us in the dark as to a great potential that exists for all if such technologies were allowed into the public realm of awareness as well as an expansion of awareness that would occur with the disclosure of a much greater human history as well as past technologies more developed than what we enjoy today and at times a more integrated awareness on a spiritual and energetic basis versus the weaponization of religious perspective of a more arbitrary nature to render humanity in a more media oriented state to establish an outer perspective to describe the inner focus and identity, severely filtered and developing a media oriented mentality and guilt-based -- before the redevelopment of physical technologies for mass communication through print and electronic means that without a doubt have existed in our past . . while requiring anything else to define for us what is real and what makes us acceptable, unaccused and guilt-free, conditioning us to function in a lower compulsive version of ourselves based upon group oriented behavior and identification.
The compulsive need for agreement is the source of conflict by which we are not free to think for ourselves, by which we must watch one another and accuse the other side of any point of division -- and by which those who understand the process then support both sides for a longer term outcome in their interest, be it through war and any other form of political, cultural and social crisis that can be created and maintained on that basis.
No individual ever started a war of his own initiative. Any example to the contrary requires repetition, rather than comprehension in the context of events and the value of individual perspective. We don't need to love or hate anyone to restore individual sight. The individual perspective is the focus of power by which no person can be set against another with false or self-serving interpretations from another outside of ourselves.
Not one thread can be broken, lest individual awareness on an energetic basis of connectivity be restored under ones identity carried from birth. This is the nature of concern for an issue of an old space program using limited technologies that existed at that time in the public awareness. Every aspect of the Apollo program suffers from serious difficulties and discrepancies in the official record, only one of which render the entire program a theater for public consumption. Although near-Earth orbit is real, there are also indications of questionable activity concerning its veracity for some activities as demonstrated, regardless of hardware floating around in space. This is not in any way a denial of programs involving near-Earth orbit rather than specific activities that don't hold up under critical review.
Joe, before it's too late. There are still 4 Apollo astronauts that walked on the moon for you to have on your show as well as the crew of Apollo 8. As of today May 12, 2013, Buzz Aldrin, David Scott, Charles Duke and Harrison Schmitt are still alive. Talk to one of them for God's sake!
2013?
The problem is none of these men give interviews about the moon landing. They never have. They only gave the initial press conference after the initial landing and that’s it.
I want this just so Buzz Aldrin can sock him in the mouth from across the table when he questions the veracity of the moon landing.
@@braulioaguilera4267 not one of them will swear on a bible they've been to the moon, if they did it would end all this discussion.
What does Buzz Aldrin do now?
Designing rockets, deep sea exploring, speaking all over the world for privatizing space and stimulating support for America's space program. Buzz is as active today as when he walked on the moon. He has written six books and numerous articles advocating concepts for the future of space travel.
I love Ben he wasn't my favorite fighter for sure. But as a person he seems like a genuine and humble guy.
Agree
I will allways wonder how the fight against Mascidal had went, had he just not dived from the 1 second of the fight
Yeah such a humble guy. Scamming people through crypto scams without even bothering to look into what he’s promoting. Just taking his pay then scamming his fans.
Ben ? Joe was a fighter
Yeah but China confirmed we went. They have photos of our equipment left behind. That’s enough for me cause we hate each other.
There were 14 Apollo missions from 1961 to 1972.
6 missions landed on the moon.
2 other missions were to orbit around the moon and the latter to orbit around the moon and dock and undock from the lander.
So they spent 11 years faking 14 missions.
Here is how we know the US and the Soviets went to the moon.
1) The Soviets tried to steal the Apollo thunder by landing first, but their rover crashed into the moon a day before.
2) The Soviets landed multiple rovers on the moon with their Luna program. It lives on today with NASA. When the Soviet Union collapsed the Luna scientists were hired by NASA. All the rovers on Mars are the grandchildren of the Soviet Luna program. They even use the same independent 6 wheel design.
3) The most recent theory that the Earth is a 2nd or 3rd generation planet is because of the Apollo and Luna programs. The rocks brought back and studied by scientists over the world show the moon and the Earth share the same chemical makeup. This is only possible due to collision. The latest theory is a smaller planetoid hit the Earth at a high angle. It knocked off the outer crust and made it molten. The Earth had a ring, like Saturn, until the debris reformed as the moon.
4) The European space agency, Chinese, Japanese, Russia and NASA have sent missions to map the moons surface and to identify mineral deposits. ALL of the Apollo landings show up in the pictures.
Fast forward six years and Joe talks to Bart Sibrel
You can tell old Joe is watching what he says now.
Yes and I really like that he doesn’t say that he doesn’t believe it but behind closed doors there’s so much more that I would like to talk about with joe Rogan
Oh shut up lol. Is there no end to yhe paranoia of you whackjobs? What's so hard to accept he has changed his mind after becoming better informed?? I hate to admit it but i once believed 911 was 'an inside job', but after some thorough research, it soon became evident there was no truth to any of the conspiracy claims.
This was filmed almost 5 years ago.... lmao
Seeing how people are losing lawsuits for defamation and others prosecuted for threats... freedom of speech is just an expression these days.
@@robby844 it was, but that still fits in with his comment. It's much longer than 5 years ago that Joe was very different to what he is now.
When Rogan Says "I think I don't know," he could be referring to any subject he ever had an opinion about.
"That video is real. That's from Television."
🤣👌
My favourite bedtime fairytale
Junk online conspiracy theory? You should grow up.
@@yassassin6425 are u kidding me? yr so stupid, I literally called it a fairytale, a fucкing bedtime bullshit story, some background sound to fall asleep, and u decided to shine your 58 chromosomes by telling me its a bshit conspiracy and I needa grow up? U needa start learning how to read kid
When you see a thumbnail like that with that title, you just have to click on it lol.
Nothing like clocking out of work, getting in my car and driving home listening to this. Fun.
DONT TEXT AND DRIVE!
regards,
Captain Hindsight.
Agime jumping to play but falling and tearing open your space suit 260,000 miles from Earth. You get to be the lonelinest death in history
Neil Armstrong saw aliens and had to keep quiet about it
How do you know then?
@@yassassin6425 The aliens told him
All I'm gonna say if it genuinely was a plane that killed several people and crashed into the fucking pentagon, one of the most highly secured fucking buildings in the U.S. if not the most secured, there would be more than security footage that has about 3fps consistently and looks nothing like a plane, flies unbelievably low to the ground (In a 747 presumably btw which would have been torn to fucking pieces flying at that speed that low) and 20 years later cant give us any of the footage besides that. They confinscated camera feed from every local place that was in any location even remotely capable of capturing footage of it. How are people not supposed to assume they are feeding us bullshit. They wouldnt be hiding this shit for 20 years waiting for everyone to forget about it. The footage they gave us makes gas station CCTV look like 4k man.
It really was a plane. This is documented historical fact.
It was 2001. There were no HD cameras or security cameras that were capable of that sort of resolution at that time. Hell, cellular phone cameras were more advanced and that’s simply due to bureaucratic government purchasing and procurement policies. 9/11 helped change ALL of that. Now there’s high res cameras everywhere. It just isn’t the way you’re saying it should’ve been on that day. A commercial jetliner hit the pentagon and did catastrophic damage to the structure. Nearly totally disintegrating the airframe and fuselage of the aircraft and killing 184. Altitude has nothing to do with the aerodynamic forces exerted on the plane. You’ve obviously never seen test footage of a 757 flying fast and low. They don’t just come apart. Wow.
@@subswithnovideos-oz4zo no, it isn't..
@@marklewen9384 You can say that all you want, doesn't change the reality of the situation. Planes were hijacked by terrorists which crashed into buildings and one in a field.
There are literal videos of the planes hitting the buildings, there's recordings of phone calls of people on the plane, there's literal records of all the people on the planes.
@@subswithnovideos-oz4zo there is zero evidence of hijackers. The planes were flown from the ground. No plane hit the pentagon. Even the pilot who Flew the exact plane that supposedly hit the pentagon 300 times said he couldn't hit the pentagon without help from the ground. 19 hijackers who just learned to fly on single engine cessnas COULD NEVER DO IT.
i think Joe has realized that he can't change minds while admitting he believes in it. I don't think he's sold out, but like everyone who's looked in to these things knows, you can't change people's minds if they think you're crazy.
Didn't he just said "I don't know"?
He's talked to enough astronauts to understand that he was just mistaken. Everything in life will always seem "shady" or "weird" if you look into it too much. It's like saying a word too many times; eventually it loses its meaning.
Which is exactly why the powers that ought not be coined the term "conspiracy theorists ". Now when you hear someone being called a conspiracy theorists it automatically discredits them and people think they are nuts! 9 times out of 10 the conspiracy theories are true..
@@Bollibompa very true and a well worded simile, but you can’t argue that there is an opposite to what you said as well.
@@jamiesuzanne5781 9 out 10 time the conspiracy freak is either an ignorant clown with a room temp IQ, or a con man like Kaysing, preying on the dimwitted and gullible.
I used to sell autographed Pictures at a Gallery. We had 1 Neil Armstrong that was signed by him. It was more valuable, because Neil was buying them all up before he died. He and the other crew members had many of them signed for their wives , prior to the Mission. It's obvious they never went
🤦♂
“You can’t get down without no base”
Great quote
I've often wondered if they faked the first landing just to end the space race with the Russians. Then , actually went there later.
Yes. & Nope. With what they did for the fake one, They would of absolutely made a spectical of a real one.
@@jeffmiller3499 The US was way to proud to lie about something like this. We went to the moon. The US always took every chance to flex. They had the money and tech, it's easier to say "here's a blank check. get us to the moon before the russians do".
The Soviets were the people who had the most to gain by exposing it as a fake, yet they never did.
Anton, No, faked them all. When I first looked at this just 5 years ago all the photos were available on nasa;s web site. I read, never went there. year or so later learned they started "re-mastering" all the photos. Used to be you could look at that picture of the stand in that suited up to pose for the picture of buzz and find several objects in back ground. Now the picture has been cropped to just a fraction of the original size but they also relocated the crosses to hide that fact. Used to be able to just turn up saturation and brightness and see the quite clear outlines of buildings complete with doors, trees, autos and trucks in parking lot and ac equip on roof. But a few good videos available that make it clear it was a hoax. Just so sick of all the lies and everybody thinks they so smart cuz they are believers in all the lies. crap. Basically, everything the government wants you to believe is bs. Also the trolls that are all over these comments is another tell. I hear your comment is honest. I know I struggled with this stuff too cuz i was the guy that thought oswald kennedy alone. watch the video funny thing happened on the way to the moon. So I just saw a video this morning where it shows stars clearly vixible through the moon when more than half the moon is black. Then video called this the occluded stars like in the arab star and crescent flags. How did I not know this before. ? She read a quote from somebody back like 1760 or so describing this cuz he couldn't have been fooled by a satellite at least. ha. The truth really does make you free.
@@fillinman1 I don't understand why people still believe it's improbable that people landed on the moon.
Ben askren talking about moon landing is all i needed today 💀
Who the fook is that guy
I don't know because I am not an expert... Ten minutes later knowing that the footage can't be real...
The most fortified building on earth and one video that shows nothing?
Until there is another moon landing, I will remain skeptical about the moon landing. I don't know if they did or didn't land on the moon. Let them do it again.
Do it yourself, moron.
Franc Mittelo well said!
Nice burn but we have Billionaires that would do it in a second if they could. Going to the moon is one of the few things money can't buy. Think about that.
There have been 6 manned Moon landings.
Hahaha. No there hasn't. There have been ZERO. Next they'll tell you they are going to Mars, ahahaha.. ha. ZERO CHANCE. What did you 'Wiki' it.. That's good cointelpro.. If it's on Google it's true..
All of the passengers from the "plane" that hit the Pentagon were vaporized, but they found bodies of military and civilian accountants who were killed while investigating what happened to the trillions missing from the budget (interesting how the "plane" made an impossible turn, pulling g's a military pilot would have trouble with, to hit that specific part of the building). Oh, and Donald Rumsfeld was on the opposite side of the Pentagon just finishing up some paperwork while being informed that a "commercial aircraft" was headed toward the pentagon (Don't need to run for cover. I'll just chill here because I have an idea of where it's going to hit). His photo op while he was helping "save" some of the victims after the explosion in question is great too. Hahaha. The whole thing reeks to high heaven.
Geeeez bro!
The Pentagon "nearly impossible" 270° plane maneuver is the 'magic bullet' of this "conspiracy theory"!!
There were some bodies situated at the back of the plane which remained relatively intact. There are first responder accounts of the charred remains of passengers still strapped into their seats, images of which were used in court as evidence during the Moussaoui trial.
There was NOTHING "impossible" about the turn Hanjour made as it was a standard manoeuvre used by pilots to reduce altitude. There were no insane levels of G that military pilots wouls struggle with, that's total horsesh!t like everything else you've said. Back up your claims or quit spreading lies. As for Rumsfeld, the Pentagon is THE largest office building on earth so it was quite likely he would be in another part of the building. Such dumb reasoning. For the record, the alleged missing 2.3 trillion was later accounted for, was announced back in 1999 (as opposed to the day before as truthers like to claim) and was never missing in the way truthers say. It was merely a case that they were using computer systems that were incompatible making it extremely difficult to track between departments.
@@dirkdiggler8260 lol. Shut up you shill. You just joined CZcams 4 months ago and you're just spreading misinformation in favor of the federal government to fool the public. All you tell is lies
@brettski I'm sorry but you're talking like this is in question when it isn't. We have public documents proclaiming this missing money from 1999 so anyone stupidly claiming it was announced the day prior in an attempt to cover it up is easily refuted and demonstrably wrong. Why would they bother announcing it at all if it was as truthers claim?? It makes zero sense. Just another half truth, truthers seize upon in another desperate attempt to make the ridiculous conspiracy theories fly.
This is why I like listening to Joe Rogan. Because he realized he didn't know enough about it. And he stopped saying it now. That's what any smart person should do. If you don't know enough about a specific subject. You probably shouldn't go out acting like you know for sure what happened. Bravo to joe I definitely give him a lot of respect super smart guy
That last clip with the astronaut standing up would be super strange if there wasn’t another astronaut there who had his hand when he got up
And Ben Askren is a perfect example of whats being taught in schools. He knows nothing about history.
he is about as smart as a meatball
He knows about the important lies told though
Not a dicking thing, lol
Since when does looking into the moon landing equate to being intelligent? This comment in itself is idiotic. Some people don’t have time or simply don’t care about space and what happened in 1969.
@@tyler6971 good point. But the OP is correct overall though. They don't teach you sh*t in school. My little sister thought the Civil War was fought between the American and the British until highschool when they finally decided to put that into curriculum
Well we have a member of NASA on tape admitting that we "lost" the instructions for apollo
@Kelly Arthur It's stupid 'cause you can't destroy what never existed in first place.
What are you trying to say?
@@alphanerd7221 Don't you know? After the moon travels NASA ""lost"" the technology and doesn't know how to do it again. Mysteriously it got destroyed, somehow, somewhere, after people started doing questions.
@@GranMaese Yeah that's BS. The did lose the designs for the Saturn 5 but they were never going to build it again. That really isn't any kind of point.
It isn't destroyed. The plans are in some filing cabinet in a room full of filing cabinets. It's not like they would have showed them anyway. They are classified. If NASA just never said anything you would have no idea.
The questions are stupid. Everyone who isn't dumb knows we went to the moon.
@@alphanerd7221 Damn, you are so nervous and scared, your passive-aggresive attitude demonstrates that. So gullible...
They were ""destroyed"" (never existed if you asked me). That's literally the reason they give on why they can't reach it ""anymore"". They are clueless on how to do it ""again"".
Everyone who isn't dumb and indoctrinated knows we did not go to the moon.
The one thing that really bugs me is "why was nokia given a contract to install 4G communications tech on the moon NOW when 5G is being rolled out currently and 6G is already well on its way in development?"
No ones addressed this at all...
It’s cheaper, simpler, easier to install and they don’t need the main feature of 5G, which is to provide support for much larger numbers of client devices does not apply. Companies want 5G is because they can deliver more data to more customers, faster. Every single cellular increment, from 1G to 5G was an improvement on the carrier’s ability to carry data to customers. They want to host more customers, deliver more data, and go faster.
Astronauts don’t need that on the moon, and we aren’t planning to move enough people to warrant a 5G network anytime soon. Its also expensive and requires more infrastructure. Also, because a 5G tower operates on a higher-frequency band, higher frequencies require more power and travel less distance.
Listening to Rogan try to analyze the moon landing is like watching a monkey with a calculator claiming it's fake because it won't turn on his television.
youtube used to have a ton of videos on this subject, now i cant find any of them, except for the ones that say if you dont beleive we landed on the moon then you are a fool
censorship...
You can thank all of the internet's crazy conspiracy nut jobs for that. Once really dangerous conspiracy theories started becoming a lot more mainstream like anti-vax, qanon, etc. big tech decided to crack down hard on conspiracy theories. Thanks to that there were many innocent casualties like moon landing conspiracies. It's like they say. This is why we can't have nice things. Someone always has to ruin it for everyone else.
@@bestieswithtesties i dont see what is dangerous about different opinions, but i do think coraling us all into thinking and believing the same things and removing any opposing view is super dangerous, communist china levels of bad. i personally know people that are crazy and believe some really bad information, but our society once cherished freedom of speech and free press for all ideas. let the bad information speak for its self and let everyone see just how bad it is, removing opposing ideas only makes those who have power afraid of something, imo thats worse than some of the meth head ideas i hear.
@@jasonbrown467 Because when you disregard facts and reality and replace it with your "opinion" things get extremely dangerous. For example, believing that vaccinations cause autism despite there being no evidence of it. This causes people not to vaccinate their kids which puts both the kid in extreme danger and any kids they come in contact with in danger. Or the crazy qanon conspiracy that has led to real life violence and death. Including the insurrection at the capitol which left 5 dead. It is a simple fact that conspiracy theorists in America, specifically the far right, have gotten completely out of control and they're spreading straight up lies and misinformation that is causing people to take to the streets in the real world and hurt or even kill others because they're so far gone and out of touch with reality. It is a danger to all of society without a doubt. Our country still has free speech. Anyone who complains about private companies not respecting free speech clearly don't understand what free speech even is. All it means is that the government can't arrest you for what you say (with exceptions) it doesn't mean you can just say whatever you want without repercussion from other citizens, your employer or superiors, or privately owned companies. On TOP of that, the people running these websites/companies like youtube and twitter ALSO have the freedom of speech which means they can't be forced to publish things on their platforms that they don't want to. THAT would be unconstitutional.
@@bestieswithtesties you are not being honest with your self if you think the right doesnt feel the same way about the left's propaganda. that is why a healthy compromise is important, or you end up in a civil war. your fact really are just your feelings btw. for example the left feels having open borders will solve all the problems of this country, sure they can spit out some numbers to "prove" their position but its all just feelings and perspective. if we cant even agree to let one said have their opinion and talk openly about it, what does that say about your side? if people think that hitting them selfs in the head with a sledge hammer will cure their disease it is not your right to tell them that they cant even talk about it. dont try to correct me about what free speech is, your team has lost credibility on your understanding the constitution. when a teacher gives a lesson to children about ho evil trump is you claim free speech, when nfl players take a knee, you claim free speech. also social media needs to decide if it is a platform or a publisher. i appreciate your toning down your insults, but i think we should go our separate ways, we cant even agree on how important it is that ideas from both sides should be heard, there no fixing that at right will not submit to your team such a fundamental concept that your team takes for granted with your 4 years of "mostly peaceful" protesting, where lives were lost and billions in property damage occurred
There was literally a CNN reporter walking around the scene right after it happened, and said there was not a single piece of anything that looked like any sort of plane debris in the entire mess.
CNN has always been such a credible source right up to this day..
@@tylergrundy4436 I think that was one time they let the truth slip through. Of course he changed his story soon after
@@tylergrundy4436 CNN is pro-system though
@@Coopdog1911 I remember this. There was a hole in the pentagon that was smaller than the plane. No wings left outside the building - and no marks on the building where the wings would have hit. The wings just disappeared.
The surveillance clip from the gas station across the street conveniently had the frames removed from the video which would have shown what flew past. All we got was a few frames of an approaching shadow, skipped frames, then a few frames of a fireball then it cuts
A plane hit the pentagon.
Plus the little problem with the Van Allen belt that takes like 10 hrs to pass thru
Just a suggestion - but it's always an idea to familiarise yourself with at best, the very basics of a subject before you declare it fake. Firstly, they are belts, since there are two, with a third that is transitory. Secondly, "like ten hours" - what on Earth are you talking about? Thirdly, if you really feel the need to continue this exchange, consider the following.
If you have a shred of integrity the I'd like you to honestly ask yourself the following questions.
1/ How much do I genuinely know about the Van Allen Belts? - their shape extent and distribution? Energies and intensity? Type of radiation?
2/ What do I actually understand by alpha and beta particle radiation and shielding against it?
3/ What have I understood about the actual structure of the Command Module and the materials that it was fashioned from?
4/ What have I learnt about the trajectories flown by each of the Apollo missions and their passage through the belts?
5/ What do I know about what James Van Allen himself have to say about the belts and the Apollo missions?
If the answer to these questions is nothing, then obtaining the answers first will prevent you form humiliating yourself in the future and avoid making such a dumb and ignorant statement on a public comments section with no actual prior knowledge about the subject.
@@yassassin6425 sweetheart.. the only dumb looking one is your ridiculously long babble of an answer.
POINT... they did not fly 35mm film and 16mm movie film through a radiation belt... of any kind considering you cannot even put film thru an X-ray machine at the airport and safely get properly exposed film.
@@chadkbrignall22
So chose not to exercise any humility or heed my advice and arrogantly continue to post nonsense about a subject that you clearly have zero understanding of whatsoever.
Do you understand what charged particle radiation is? Why are you mentioning X rays? Why are you doing this to yourself?
@@yassassin6425why do u feel the need to comment on every moon landing video on CZcams 😆
Incorrect. They did send creatures around the moon before the moon landing.
The Soviet Union did - Zond 5.
For the astronaut standing up part, isn’t he using his left arm to grab onto the other astronaut right arm to stand up? I cant tell
It's either the other astronaut's hand or something on his suit.
@Ned Simlish im not agreeing or denying anything. Im just saying that if I weighed like 15kg instead of the 60 I actually weigh, i could probably pull that off. It could still be fake tho
@Ned Simlish also we weren’t there so we don’t know what actually happened. For all we know they could’ve stayed home that day or they could’ve gone to the moon and back twice. They could’ve even gone at the ISS for a beer and then came back down. Only they know what actually happened and unfortunately everything we’re left with are theories and speculations :/
Is he not pushing up with his right hand? Impossible on earth, but it seems plausible your tricep could do the job if you are strong and in low gravity.
@@stevejohnson2627that’s what it looks like
“I don’t know” it’s amazing how aligned my own views on conspiracy’s / UFO’s etc are with Joe.
A whole 11 years later… I was playing pong on an Atari 2600. Yes, a wooden console. And you’re telling me that they landed on the moon 11 years earlier? 😂😂😂😂😂
TezEff What has "pong" got to do with anything? Are you saying they didn't have the technology?
I don’t believe that in 1969 it was possible to go to the moon.
Mannn! This guest truly wasn’t lying when he said that he doesn’t know much about Moon and space!
The conversation is such a non-conversation.
As one knows, it's not even worth contributing to the diatribe.
Moon landing deniers - without realising it - are treated with just as much disdain as "Flat Earthers" are to the academical world.
Dunning-Kruger syndrome...
If they did show simulations and passed them off as the real thing...my next question would be why/how would you make a simulation to look exactly like space including the black background? Why go for over the top realism unless they were purposely trying to pull one over. I've seen some of the tests and simulations and they didn't bother making it look like it was in space. I'm with Joe, I'm not convinced either way but something squirly was going on. You know how you can be certain shady business was going on? Government was involved.
Have you…. Ever seen a Hollywood movie? It’s incredibly easy to fake a realistic looking background. Unless I misunderstood your comment
@@JA-jx1hk “why would they paint a background black, it’s easier to just go to the moon”
Great effort is made to prevent people from gaining an individual perspective by which we cannot be divided. The idea of questioning anything has been developed into an extremely effective point of division in fear of accusation that requires repetition to establish a safe zone by which we are not free to think for ourselves in normalized human behavior and acceptance. The concept of conspiracy has been developed beyond its original intent as a legal term regarding a case being adjudicated in court where it has specific meaning to come to a resolution according to the law. In any other context, it serves no value unless the intent is to distract and discredit in fear-based response on a shared basis by which no initiative remains in consideration on an individual basis. Group oriented behavior and identification has been the means by which the evolution of human affairs and events have been managed for as long as we can remember in human history as we know it today.
Shared compulsion of fear never needs to be acknowledged by which we then wait for others to take on the responsibility of writing the script going forward, through assumption based upon repetition no longer engaging or requiring the concept of initiative that equates to responsibility for any information or decision making -- an extremely serious evolution lest we regain a grasp on that basis -- when none have a clue who is responsible for so much concern for any serious issue and narrative public or otherwise. The perception of privilege in regard to any information and activity as a part of this process additionally provides much greater access to resources and decisions made, managed no differently than the public through the circulation of information with even less concept of where initiative lay as a part of the process. Much greater potential for deception is then possible than those means by which the public merely need be kept ignorant and occupied. Public programs can serve very well for this purpose as much greater technological developments can remain undisclosed for the benefit and advantage of a relative few, such efforts supported by inside narratives to justify keeping us in the dark as to a great potential that exists for all if such technologies were allowed into the public realm of awareness as well as an expansion of awareness that would occur with the disclosure of a much greater human history as well as past technologies more developed than what we enjoy today and at times a more integrated awareness on a spiritual and energetic basis versus the weaponization of religious perspective of a more arbitrary nature to render humanity in a more media oriented state to establish an outer perspective to describe the inner focus and identity, severely filtered and developing a media oriented mentality and guilt-based -- before the redevelopment of physical technologies for mass communication through print and electronic means that without a doubt have existed in our past . . while requiring anything else to define for us what is real and what makes us acceptable, unaccused and guilt-free, conditioning us to function in a lower compulsive version of ourselves based upon group oriented behavior and identification.
The compulsive need for agreement is the source of conflict by which we are not free to think for ourselves, by which we must watch one another and accuse the other side of any point of division -- and by which those who understand the process then support both sides for a longer term outcome in their interest, be it through war and any other form of political, cultural and social crisis that can be created and maintained on that basis.
No individual ever started a war of his own initiative. Any example to the contrary requires repetition, rather than comprehension in the context of events and the value of individual perspective. We don't need to love or hate anyone to restore individual sight. The individual perspective is the focus of power by which no person can be set against another with false or self-serving interpretations from another outside of ourselves.
Not one thread can be broken, lest individual awareness on an energetic basis of connectivity be restored under ones identity carried from birth. This is the nature of concern for an issue of an old space program using limited technologies that existed at that time in the public awareness. Every aspect of the Apollo program suffers from serious difficulties and discrepancies in the official record, only one of which render the entire program a theater for public consumption. Although near-Earth orbit is real, there are also indications of questionable activity concerning its veracity for some activities as demonstrated, regardless of hardware floating around in space. This is not in any way a denial of programs involving near-Earth orbit rather than specific activities that don't hold up under critical review.
The conspiracy is not that they didn't go to the moon. The conspiracy is that they have been to the moon. Exactly like the globe model. Conspiracy is that they said it is a globe. Not that the earth is flat and motionless. Like Einstein said " there is not even one experiment that can detect the motion of the earth".
Why are you misquoting (and quote-mining) Einstein?
Every time the camera shifts to Ben I see him getting flying kneed 😂😂😂
Bruh I still feel like that after all this time😂😂
Homeboy looks like he did a sourhead challenge or they put a box of some stanley diapers under his table
me 2
😂
Cut it out man
It's pretty simple, cost vs reward of going to the moon is a very one sided story. If there were potential habitable areas or valuable assets there, we would have colonized and or strip mined it by now. As far as the argument of the technology differences of then to now only reflects progress. Does anyone remember seeing photos of the first contraptions people were trying to take flight with? Now compare that with a SR-71. If those first guys hadn't tried, the latter wouldn't exist. It's always trial by fire when attempting such phenomenal new feats. So the first missions to the moon were indeed extremely risky (especially by today's standards) but they were the first steps in seeing how far we could go. While I will agree somethings do seem out of place with the moon landing, (but what hasn't had things out of place when a government is behind the wheel) the fact that we now certainly have the technology to get people there and back but don't, leads me to believe they had seen what they needed to see and the results didn't yield a worth while reward to merit continued expeditions. And yes, a lot of scientists and engineers of that time were plucked from Nazi Germany. Now the video showing the guy standing up after falling, if you look his right hand is down as well as his right knee. His left hand appears to be holding onto the standing astronaut. Standing up from that position in 1/6 gravity using your right knee and hand to push off of the surface and your left hand pulling down on the other astronaut, wouldn't be that big of a grasp.
Get layed once.in your life
@@inyourwifesas1033 Your name speaks volumes about your projection issues within your own words.
I bet lol
Lmao yea dude sure it’s not like don Pettit made an entire Ted talk about why the moon would be of ultimate scientific importance. Stop lying to yourself in order to just go along with what the elites that hate us want us to think. We didn’t go and it’s the most logical conclusion we can come to seeing the modern state of nasa and what happened after the “moon landings”.
@@JA-jx1hk When you read a posted reply that begins with LMAO, you just know you're in for a wealth of well thought out statements, arguments and fact.... (FART SOUND).....
And dude!!! That press conference he literally said we didn't break the atmosphere! Now you've got me thinking that there is no robots outside orbit either
What on Earth are you talking about?
Bottom line technology in 1969 wasn’t good enough to fake landing on the moon.
Fascinating. What in particular was lacking and why?
@@yassassin6425 czcams.com/video/cVMO8hXL-Bo/video.htmlsi=mVHk38B_lCNw_wUS
@@yassassin6425 czcams.com/video/oR_e9y-bka0/video.htmlsi=qgtNsvyirR4Egucj
@@yassassin6425 these were the best films at the same time
@@DannyGmusicc
What?
Joe "Believe the government account on 9/11" Rogan
to say 9/11 was inside job seems pretty obvious, but that's not to say everyone was in on the fix.
Those angled cuts don't naturally happen.
The 9/11 conspiracy theory is silly as fuck.
G.Gorrell what are you talking about it's proof the twin towers were engineered for an impact frrom a full size jet linear. Because of the plane that crashed into the new York skyline in the early 1920s
Definitely intervention of some kind. There's molten steel pouring out of the sides of the building before the towers fell. Joe has his 3 that he'll bring up: moon landing, northwoods, gulf of tanken. There is so much evidence of foul play in 911 but he always treats that as nuts. There is more evidence there than the moon landing that's for sure
Joe understands that he can't be 100% honest on how he feels about certain subjects because it could cost him potential jobs in mainstream media. Smart on his part, still a little disappointing nonetheless
he defiantly sold out a few years ago
Your a moron what mainstream media work does he do? Maybe your just dumb as fuck and he's not.
He sold out when he was saying shit like "Bernie Sanders has insane beliefs about wealth..." like what.. that it should be used to make the world a better place for everyone and not just a dreamland for a select few? Fuck Joe Rogan I hope someone shivs him in the throat. Along with all these other shill fucks and sellout politicians... then move on to all the god damn rich 1% assholes who, last year, made over 80% of all the income in the world. There is no need for it. They are hurting people, killing people, and they don't care. They will not stop until they have anything and if we wait too long we aren't going to even have the strength to fight back at all. Which is what they are counting on... boil a frog slowly and what not.
HHstutz55 it's sad how people can't see this! Clear as day if your not brainwashed. I have listened to 90 percent of all joe's podcasts and definitely see what you see.
ScoutFighter #1 Sad that people can't see he will say anything to keep his luxurious life? What's actually sad is you don't realize that we do see it and that is exactly the fucking problem.
"truths protective layers" is referring to the Scientific pursuit of the answers of how things work. Science generally makes discoveries in a piece by piece or layered way. Going to the moon wasn't send a rocket to the moon, it was a step by step process or uncovering the final answer a layer at a time.
Exactly. But some people see a conspiracies in their coffee. In the CZcams Age, everybody and anybody gets to say whatever crap clogs their heads and spit out. Include me in.
Joe must be the only human on the planet who changed his opinion on the truth about the moon landings. Remarkable how this guy goes back and forth..
I think he still believes that they faked it and no human ever touched the moon, but he realized that it's silly to say it publicly.
Because there are way too many people who believe it and will call him ignorant and whatnot.
The weirdest thing I have read is that after leaving Earth atmosphere the astronauts would have this 'hallucinations' is the best way to describe it. Apparently Buzz Aldrin was the one who talked about it.
High G from the launch restricts blood flow to the brain, they absolutely could have been a bit loopy after that
If the landing never really happened, then why didnt we hear anything like that from the Soviets? Weren't they following the whole thing live?? They wouldn't have missed the chance to pick up on that
It baffles me that people think the most egocentric, ambitious and fraudulent nation in the hole world once went to the moon with that shit ass spacecraft
How did we do science on over 800 pounds of moon rocks from multiple missions? Lol. It obviously happened
The soviets literally reached out and congratulated us when they could’ve claimed it was fake
I remember being in class when the Apollo 13 crisis was going on . I was in a private school so we were able to pray all together as a class.
Nobody ever stepped foot on the moon. Remember they told you Santa was real, and easter bunny. Bullshit .
No one ever told me that Santa and the Easter bunny were real. They are simply popularised imaginary characters fed to infantile mentalities, much like the junk online conspiracy theorists that tell you what to think. And who precisely are 'they'?
The equipment we used to get to the moon used old processes. The basic blueprints aren't enough either because the engineers had their notes to make improvements and most of it is unreadable to everybody else. We have to use new processes, retest everything and design everything from scratch using modern processes
🤡
really inigga
say what
this is entirely false. no space exploration “notes” are lost to unreadable scriptures. everything was definitely documented and shared between scientists and engineers.
They’re selling books that’s been translated a zillion times claiming it’s the actual word of god that we are still reading today but we can’t read the notes of the Americans from 1969? 🤔
If the Hubble space telescope can take pictures of galaxies thousands of lightyears away, why couldn't it take a simple shot of our lunar lander left on the moon?
or our flag we left up there.
Bro you sound like a conspiracy theorist. This line of thinking is very dangerous for our democracy. You need to trust the science.
I think you’ll find that telescope is designed for long distance photography and if it were to take a shot like that of the moon it would just be a blurry mess.
Same is true for any camera I suppose, I’m no photographer that’s for sure but the principle of it..
@@willemsgrahpics how convenient
It wouldn’t matter because there would STILL be idiots who would claim the Hubble Moon images were faked. I sleep just fine knowing the moon landings happened, and that they happened exactly as documented. Thousands of highly educated people were tasked by the Kennedy administration to put a man on the moon by the end of the 1960’s and by damn, they did it. And they did it again and again, well into the 1970’s. Going back there is prohibitively expensive, even with cheaper, faster computers and rocket tech. We’ve been there, done that, on to the next…
You forgot the Dune Buggy and the astronauts playing golf!😂😂😂
And?
the astronaut standing up looked perfectly normal to me, his left arm is leaning on the other astronaut, and all he had to do was lift 60 lbs in reduced gravity if he was about 180lbs + the 180lbs space suit
I feel like joe likes sitting on the fence
J Gibbs You kinda gotta be or youd be kinda bias..He's trying to be unbias..Best way to be..yall no this..
Joe sits on the fence to be liked not because he isn't biased.. He is very bias on a lot of subjects. He just doesn't want to come off as a conspiracy theorist because he likes the idea of coming off as a "intellectual" and of course he gets more views which makes more money if he plays the intellectual.
Iz G Maybe so..He aint perfect..we all flip on things..Best to look from all forms to form the best opin on things..butt no ones perfect..but i here ya..
Whats wrong with that?
its called being balanced and intellectually honest