@@platypuss619 The politicians trying to "take care" of people using tax dollars and government programs are keeping people in poverty. The goal for them is not to help. It's to keep people down so the politicians can buy their votes later.
Thats right, like 98% of people will think im crazy if i told them hollywood and the music industry and the news is casting spells on you to keep you asleep. Keep your eyes closed.
The young boy with the apollo sweater on, my mother designed that sweater in 1969 and it was sent to Dr Gilruth who passed it onto Neil Armstrong. My mother was the fastest knitter in the world at the time, Gwen Matthewman. The sweater now resides in the history museum in Ohio US. The pattern for the sweater was released in late 1969 by Lister and that's how a copy ended up in the movie.
Been onto these scammers since the 50's and 60's Did the Germans really start WW2? Try why did some outfit declare war on the Germans in Mar 1933! That's why Hitler had a certain crew locked up, just as the US locked up 100's of 1000's of the Japanese community after Pearl Harbor History is the Greatest lesson in life, never forget it
Charlotte Iserbyt, whistle blower, author of “The Dumbing Down of America...,” senior policy advisor of Reagan’s BOE, stated that, “If you want to know what goes on in those “meetings” watch “Eyes Wide Shut.”
@@jamestown4867 And I can't remember which Kubrick movie it was, but they removed lots of parts that were to revealing either without his approval or after his death.
kubrick hated hollywood, he hated the film company executives so much he would do anything to avoid having to work with them which is why he made most of his movies in the uk.
That’s why he made “eyes wide shut” exposing the Hollywood elites. And he died a mysterious death like a week after filming, and supposedly a whole lot of the film was cut out and lost forever to no choice of his own
@@dr.penguin9412 His constant reference to Rainbows in eyes wide shut Interesting, the founder of NXIVM had schools called Rainbow Cultural Garden Even more Interesting. The term where the rainbow ends, comes from the Ancient Occult belief, that, if you offered a child up to Moloch, you got to keep any gold or jewels that was found at the end of the rainbow. Of course in ancient times, they actually believed there was gold under the rainbow. Today, we know, its a trick of the light.
...New world order led by obama and pope francis is coming. Jesus christ is coming back for the rapture. Get ready. Dont believe the coming ufo alien abduction narrative
2001 was released before the first Apollo landing and Kubrick's depiction of the Moon's surface differs greatly from its appearance in the Apollo footage. The movement of characters on the Moon in 2001 differs from that of the filmed movement of Apollo astronauts, and does not resemble an environment with 1/6 the gravity of Earth.
4:41 Rogan cracks me up when his guest tries to detour from the conversation Rogan wants to have. "Nixon bombed Cambodia!" "Yeah," then goes back to his train of thought.
@@davelebowski2859 You obviously have never seen him with a full panel asking him questions. Biden was there before in the 80's with him, making no sense (Biden). What you have said is not true or fact, only what you feel, which is worthless. You make up things to say so you feel better. Pathetic.
Fifty three years ago we went to the moon but cannot do it today? This is a disconnect in logic. The press conference is unbelievably depressing when it should be a celebration.
@@seanpratt4704 And totally PROVES Rogan is Controlled opposition. ...the young, hip, cool, "happening" dude, that everyone "loves", ...to sell us a MOUNTAINOUS AVALANCHE OF HORSESH!T! Same with Russell Brand! Theyre both PUPPETS of the satanic globalists!
@@LiGhTfOoT_ Its one of those movies especially in the space sequences that make you feel like you're high on drugs its a hypnotic ambient experience that you'll never forget.
2001 blew a lot of minds back then, including mine. The special effects compared to everything else at the time was literal witchcraft. '69 was also the last year for Star Trek. Coincidence?👀🤣
On the set of dr. Strangelove Kubrick had so accurately depicted the cockpit of the B-52 he actually got a visit from the government because the specs hadn't yet been declassified.
@@emperortrevornorton3119 Kubrick basically recreated the cockpit from a small snippet of a magazine photograph that showed a small section of the guages, etc. Kubrick, with the help of aviators and experts, then filled out the rest of the cockpit how they believed it would look. They were basically spot on.
Hey ... where's major Kong?! The Apollo missions should have brought a state of the art 35 mm or 70 mm motion picture production camera. And ... the starscape would have appeared even better than those on top of Mount Everest at Night; except that such starscapes would have been visible in daylight on the moon because there is no atmosphere scattering of sunlight. The moon has no atmosphere. Why were no photographs taken of starscapes directly overhead using a shaded lens to block sunlight reflected off the regolith, and in the shade of the LEM, on a tracking tripod, with a long shutter exposure? Answer: That would be even harder to fake with enough precision to fool even an amateur astronomer; let alone thousands of them. And yes, the Earth and moon are spherical, space is a hard vacuum, and rockets are able to work in space by following Newton's Laws of conservation of momentum ... unlike a certain magic bullet I can still recall. We need to all live longer to grow wise to all the b.s. propaganda myths we are spoon fed from birth. Telomerase, Cannabis, and Iv3rm3ctin For All! Worldwide General Strike and Cease Fire! Hey CZcams! Don't ...
How about the guy who was doing a house clean out for someone and found all the copies of NASA Footage in a basement along with NASA electronic equipment. And the fucking dummy called NASA and they immediately picked it all up, and told him he could keep the old equipment, and never spoke of what was on all those reels, many claim it was all original unedited footage of moon landings, alien edits, et artifact edits, god only knows. We get a chance and anyone of us would upload it all online but this scared “do Gooder” fucked it up. Nobody knows where or how all those shelves of original footage ever ended up in that old basement and til this day NASA hasn’t said a peep about what they recovered.
Yeah, the calculations are no longer there because they deleted or destroyed all of that information? A woman Katherine Johnson who was apparently brilliant did all the math. Don Pettit literally says we can't go back because we don't have the technology. Search him on here. Is so strange that we go backwards with this specific technology with the stupidest explanations as to why.
The world has lost a ton of data and historical TV, because magnetic tapes were so expensive they were constantly reused.. But I guess we also lose a lot with hard drives, that we also rewrite over these days.. :)
Hmm... China, USA, India, Isreal, Japan, Europe, have all sent multiple missions to the moon since 2005. China successfully landed (unmaned) missions on the moon in 2013, 2018 & again in 2020 and now have a couple of kilos of moon rock back their Earth labs from the 2020 mission. India & Isreal missions crashed landed on the Moon in 2019 (lander missions failed) USA (one with South Korea) have 3 separate moon orbit missions happening right now. There are 20+ more known missions including multiple landings planned by all the above and others like Australia, Canada, UAE, Turkey, Ukraine, UK, Mexico, Netherlands, Europe and more in the next couple of years.
It doesn't surprise me at all. It cost a lot of money, they won the cold war, people were losing interest. There's only renewed interest coz the us is falling behind china
@@rfgson im not gunna let you get away with that comment are you hoping no one will fact check you, the us have a problem with there rocket so no they havnt gone anywhere they apparently want to send an unmanned rocket to the moon to make way for another one later on with astronauts. If they have been there whats the need for that. No one ever has landed and will never land on the moon
@dont tripbot It's because of Neuschwabenland. The Nazis supposedly built a base in Antarctica that was rumored to have a tropical climate. Theories about this range from Nazis discovered the hollow earth to Nazis used the base to build the UFO like bell crafts and then escaped to the moon.
The difference in moon walking "quality" between missions could be, yes the 1/6 gravity, but NASA even had a training program on how to walk on the moon. Astronauts reported how difficult it is, how center of mass can not be controlled, so a training program on how to actually walk on moon was started since first mission. Perhaps learning different body mechanics, not even natural at first, led to improvements(?) So the later missions do look more fluid.
Yeah you watched them fly a tin can with 1/,1,000,000 of our current computing power. On your black and white TV with rabbit ears antenna. On the first attempt. Grow up.
Apollo Flight Director Gene Kranz recounts these simulations in his book, Failure is not an Option: 'In the late 1960s our simulation technology had progressed to the point where it became virtually impossible to separate the training from actual missions. The simulations became full dress rehearsals for the missions down to the smallest detail. The simulation tested out the crews and controllers responses to normal and emergency conditions. It checked out the exact flight plan, mission rules, and procedures that the crew and controllers would use for a later flight.' In 2003 History Channel documentary of the same name: Kranz said: The simulations were so real that no controller could discern the difference between the training and the real mission.
That is actually what I have said and thought about Apollo 11. Once I saw a picture of the training facility and you couldn't tell the difference. I also am aware that many false flag events happen with simulation training so the others can't tell the difference of what is real or not such as 9/11 and the London train bombings.
Chris, Kubrick died on March 7th,1999. Eye's Wide Shut release date (July 16th, 1999). As for July 16th, that was the 30th anniversary of the Apollo 11 Launch, (July 16th, 1969.) As for Kubrick, his death, (March 7th), was 666 days before January 1st, 2001.... At any rate, we have Kubrick, Apollo 11, Eye's Wide Shut, & 1-1-2001 ( The 666 days.) Back to ''The Shining'', (which is also about Elites.) In a scene showing an overhead view of the Maze, if you look hard at it a certain way, you can see what looks like the numbers ''444'', right in the center of the Maze. As for the movie, The Box Office Sales for The Shining came in at $44.4 Million, (444.) Between Kubrick helping NASA, we have the Elites, Child Sexual Abuse, (In both The Shining & Eye's Wide Shut.) And also a lot of Numerology, all tied together...
The funny thing is that everyone says this, but it's not quite accurate. He would be the guy you would want to put it all together - well, except that you would have some very intense moments with astronauts gripping the side of their seats and their eyes rolling back in their heads. But all joking aside, the guy you would want would be DOUG TRUMBALL. He is the ONLY one who could have pulled it off. But even with Trumball's genius, the effects would suffer the same fate as all FX of the time - the fact that they don't age well. As much as people may argue, this simply hasn't happened with the moon footage. Otherwise, we would have movies at that time with that level of "FX" in them. We don't.
Oh it's more than idle speculation. The story I heard is that when he was making Dr Strangelove....he needed to recreate the bomber/cockpit for filming. He went to the G and asked for access. DENIED! He then proceeded to scrounge up every photograph in LIFE and LOOK mags and any source he could locate with any partial pictures and perfectly recreated the plane on his own. This is what put him on their radar.
@@dvnobles Kubrick got himself on their radar when he reconstructed a bomber perfectly for making Dr Strangelove. Later NASA gave him a one-off lens to film Barry Lyndon in candlelight. BTW - have you seen i pic of the lunar module lately? That "tech" didn't age well. It looks like it was made from a child's Erector Set and a roll of tinfoil.
Stanley Kubrick was arguably the best Director ever known to Hollywood Cinema, but the man was absolutely insane. He was talking to the key grip of one of his moves while driving. He crashed his car into a ditch mid conversation and didn’t even react. He just kept talking about the movie
@@IsaacTheSalsaShark Lol it could be, because a "crash" doesn't mean cars flipping and engines exploding. It could have easily been a nick off of a pole.
Joe "I really like that hat!" Fitzdog "Yeah, I found it in a garbage can outside The Comedy Store, the day after the 2016 election. I had to wash it because it smelled like elk and weed.""
The guy who stayed in the craft Would have seen the best stars of anybody When he went around to the dark side of the moon The sunlight would have been completely gone The stars would have been amazing
Yup, Michael Collins saw them just fine. The question landing deniers cut out of their cherry picked clip was if they could see the stars through the corona of the sun. Try doing your research.
@@UpperDarbyDetailing Um Yeah it would have been A 2 or 3 hour clip This is just a snippet And I am talking about what they talked about in the snippet They actually talked about a lot of stuff So what I said is spot on You are talking about something that's not in the snippet🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
@@oldcountryboy yes… my point that flew over your head is that that snippet was deliberately cut to make it look like Michael Collins said he didn’t see any stars. Like I already said, do your own research.
2001: A Space Odyssey is a decent indication of what Hollywood special effects could do at the time - and it’s extremely shonky. It genuinely was simpler to film on location.
I am not sure Joe has ever done 5meo, he talks about DMT a lot, but usually NN DMT. That does not come from the toad, they are two totally different things.
Calumet means peace pipe. One of the sub themes of The Shining was about the slaughter of the American Indians. Remember, the Overlook hotel was built on an Indian burial ground.
I like this type of conversation that Joe was talking about. It's fascinating. If only Stanley talked about why he did that. Did anyone ever interview him about it?
Nobody ever did because Stanley did not and COULD NOT possibly have faked Apolo. Al you have to do is watch his movie"2001"; His rendering of zero-g, and of the Moon do not look like the real thing. NoboDy had either the technology or the knowledge to fake Apollo; NOTE THAT TO THIS DAY, NO CONVINCING SIMULATION OF THE APOLLO LUNAR SURFACE EVA'S HAS EVER BEEN MADE.
@@1carpentrys No. I think Kubrick did the best he could with the technology and information he had, and he succeeded in making one of THE best movies ever made. I also think it is perfectly obvious, for reasons too numerous to even list, that Apollo was not faked, and certainly not faked by Kubrick.
Kubrick was an absolute perfectionist and demanded no restrictions on the process and the content of his movies. Some claim he ran into some G intemperance when making Dr Strangelove and 2001. Some say he made a deal with the G to produce something in exchange for free reign.(Later NASA gave him a unique lens to film Barry Lyndon). It was a deal he forever regretted which why he put all kinds of hidden clues in The Shinning...Danny's Apollo 11 sweater, Tang on the storage shelves, A11 work and no play etc. Some say it's why he made Eyes Wide Shut as an expose (we didn't get to see Kubricks intended/uncut version as he died suddenly right before it was released).
A year after watching the Shining I get dropped off at a fly-in remote lodge on Lake Clark Alaska in the winter. Closest community of 12 people is a 10 mile walk across a frozen lake. The guy helping me drop my stuff off asked me if I was afraid of ghosts because the lodge was built on an old Indian graveyard and there had been caretakers there who claimed to see their ghosts as well as the ghost of a woman who tripped on float plane dock and got decapitated. I must admit my mind strayed to the movie a few times in the months I spent there and wished I hadn't seen the movie.
Haha i was working in Ireland and the job took longer, sowe booked into a local hotel we found online, The Montague.. sounded cool. We arrived, looked a nice place, once inside, still looked cool.. once we were booked in and being shown to our rooms, the long very dated corridors, gave me an overwhelming feeling almost complete dankness. Exactly like the shining, once in the room, the door was flimsy like it had been kicked in, there was glass on the mattress under the sheet, I refused to stay, something didn't feel right, and I trust my gut... We left and booked into one down the road , few days later on a job, radio said the Montague had now been closed and was to be used for immigrants to Ireland, shootings and crazy shit happened there that's why was shut down . Really weird place, still get shudders thinking bout it..
I watched full metal jacket being filmed. It was shot at Beckton gas works in East London just around the corner from where I lived. It's also where the famous Jean Michel Jarre concert "destination docklands" was held in 1989. I sung in the choir that night along with a couple hundred other kids from poor East London schools (the famous fashion designer Lee Alexander McQueen was standing next to me as we went to school together). There's videos on here where I can watch myself aged 13 singing by Jean on a floating stage lol. One amazing night I'll never forget. We had a pretty awesome childhood for poor East London kids.
@@daveelson213 haha good times 🤭 the part where I'm on camera is when they walked 300 of us kids onto stage with our red life jackets which we all hated cos they smelt horrible and sweaty. I had bushy curly hair back then and was standing next to Alexander and a massive black lad that I remember being bigger than my dad 🤣 to this day I still see lazers and fireworks when I close my eyes and I'm sure my crap hearing is to do with that amazing night 😆
I was eleven yrs old and I recall the commentator explaining as the flag was planted that it was a stiff or springy material so that it would appear to wave. Yet somehow that was missed by theorists who use the waving flag as another piece of evidence.
Joe advocated for lockdowns and masks, then he left CA to get away from it. He’s a simpleton and easily manipulated. He trusts those “officials” who get in his head because he’s too stupid to discern fact from fiction, and therefore is not in that camp. He would believe in leprechauns if an Irish scholar told him they exist. Remember Bigfoot? He’s an old man with the intellect of a child.
A 16mm colour movie camera was used from the cockpit of the lunar module, on descent and lift off, and for some footage of the moonwalks. Additionally on Apollo 15-17 the tv camera on the lunar rover was left running and pointed at the lunar module to film the lift off from outside.
@@chrisschwarz5569it wasnt a TV camera. It was a specially-made Westinghouse camera which was about 26 cm long. It consumed 6.5 watts of power at about 30 volts.
@@chrisschwarz5569Ever heard of something called batteries? When the crews of Apollo 15-17 were about to leave, they positioned the TV camera infront of the LM. Since the camera was running on batteries, it just kept running until the battery was empty. The direction of the camera could be controlled from earth (for example like a rovercamera on mars would), so thats why the camera could pan up when the LM launched. If you look carefully, the first time they did this the pan up doesnt work out. Since there is a radio delay from earth to moon, the engineers directing the camera basically have to pre move the camera to stay with the LM. No one actually standing behind a camera would make that mistake.
The thing abt Kubrick is that his movies are “tome poems” George Lucas talks about them. They’re movies that force the actors and dialogue to take the back seat and let the other elements tell the story
@@goead Because there was more than enough footage of the original landing so they reused the tapes on other missions. For whatever reason, maybe they were cataloging missing stuff or something, they put out a request to see if anyone had them laying around which started a search through the archives and they concluded it was reused. It wasn't a big deal but people go "ermaghed they lost the tapes".
@@ChucksSEADnDEAD - “More than enough footage”. Who are you kidding? Probably the most important event in human history and they have too much footage of it? What a joke. I’ve heard the Library of Congress is an absolute disaster, and everything is misfiled and all over the place, so I could believe an American organisation screwed up, but not that they deleted it because they had too much footage.
@@DIVISIONINCISION in the movie, the way they knew everything Cruise's character was up to, makes me think they were an intelligence agency. Or had ties to. That movie was Kubrick telling the world that the world is run by a cabal of satinists
The man in charge of risk assessment for the entire Apollo program was Joseph Shea, a Ph.D level Engineer from New York. He was hired by NASA around 1963. In 1967, his team of mathematicians, engineers, rocket scientists, medical doctors and meteorologists, nearly 30 professionals, made a determination of the chances for a successful Apollo moon mission. Keep in mind, the NASA administrators required a 99.75% chance of success, before they would green light a launch. Along those lines, NASA cancelled the Space Shuttle program when they recalculated the risk assessment. Prior to 1986, NASA calculated the risk of catastrophic mission failure was 1 in 100,000. After 2 Shuttles mission failures, they determined the risk was 1 in 100 or 1%. And that was too high. Joseph Shea concluded in 1967, the chance of failure ( death of the entire Apollo crew) would be 95% per each launch. At least 10 crews, he concluded, would die before 1 landed on the moon. That was bad news for NASA. They had already spent more than $25 billion of taxpayers money into what was clearly a lost cause. By 1968, the clock was ticking. In April 1968, Stanley Kubrick released 2001 A Space Odyssey. As luck would have it, the high IQ genius who had helped Kubrick over the past 4 years, to make that movie, was Arthur C Clarke. Clarke was a key advisor to NASA and friends with the very top NASA people in the Apollo program. He is seen in photos with top NASA administrators in the mid 1960's in London. According to the film producer, Bart Sibrel, ( hated by NASA and trolls on all message boards ) he was leaked information that a staged moon landing was done in New Mexico at an Air Force base, under the eye of LBJ and other top military and gov officials. It appears the editing of the film took a long time and might not have been completed until mid 1969. What is important to note about Stanley Kubrick is that he had invented the Front Screen Projection film technique of backdrops, and it is obvious NASA folks used that film technique, to make black backgrounds in the scenes. Today, it looks very fake but NASA had no other option at the time and never guessed the film would be viewed millions of times by independent researchers. The Bart Sibrel film - " A funny thing happened on the way to the Moon "offers proof after proof of the hoax. It can still be seen on YT. One question folks will often ask, after seeing the Bart Sibrel film is, " If NASA faked the moon landing, wouldn't Russia would tell the world ". That is a good question. Consider what Russia would get from that worldwide statement. Nothing. Russia is smart. After all, they were 4-5 years ahead of NASA when they ended the moon mission program, after realizing the radiation barriers were IMPOSSIBLE to penetrate. Russia was way too smart than to yell, " America is lying." They blackmailed Nixon. Some of the blackmail payoffs are known because they were too big and too obvious to hide from anyone. However, there is a good chance a lot of the blackmail package remains secret, and perhaps 90% of it remains unknown. But that is why Russia kept quiet in my view.
@@maxsmith695 A former military police man in his death bed , tells his son about the making of the 'moon landing film at Cannon. This son who is now on in his death bed , terminal sick , tell this on camera. At Cannon , 2 hangers became one big studio.During that time renovations were going on. The trucks with props like sand did not stand out. This MP was given a list with 15 names. These people only , han entry to the studio. Among them...: Emeneger , Armstrong , Van Allen , Von Braun... . Do you think this is legit?A hoax? By the way..English is not my first language.. . I am Belgian.
@@paolojoosten6353 moon landing is 100% a hoax. The confession is real. LBJ declared in May 1968, he was not running for President in Nov 1968 election. He would not be in office in jan 1969, so he was not too worried about the moon landing hoax. Nixon is likely the person who gave the permission of NASA to fake it. Nixon was very unpopular in the summer of 1969 for carrying on a war in Vietnam nobody could explain. I was in a campground the day it was made public, July 20, 1969. Many campers had a radio and listened. Afterwards, nobody bothered to even talk about it. Back then, most people, maybe 99% assumed it was real. By 1985, a growing voice was saying it was fake. After 1995, videos on CZcams began showing all the fakery and professional photographers said it was fake. Those 12 men who say they walked on the moon were kept away from public audiences. Only Bart Sibrel and a few others were able to bring forth a lot of evidence that it was fake. Today in America 75% of adults call it fake.
Fact: the real reason the room number was changed has nothing to do with Apollo. The hotel they used for some of the shots requested they use a fake room number because they were concerned about losing business if people saw the movie and refused to stay in the room.
Yea no chance it came from a lab funded by the NIH.... Title: *"2018: Fauci on resuming gain-of-function research funding. Its just as Rand Paul said"* czcams.com/video/BXB-Nt5kV1U/video.html&ab_channel=SILVIEWmedia
It wasn't just with Full Metal Jacket, Eyes Wide Shut was also completely shot in England. Kubrick didn't want to (and at that point probably couldn't) go to New York so he sent people there to take photographs of a couple streets and had them entirely rebuild as sets, lol. That movie's budget was $65m where like $12m went to Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman and rest went to building entire streets of New York. Some scenes where Tom Cruise walks through the streets aren't even him on the set but a rear projection. I wonder who OK'd such a high budget for a movie where a couple people at a time talk to each other in a room and didn't question for what exactly do they need the extra 50 million, haha.
@@ETAisNOW yes free rein in hollyweird but after eyes wide shut they cut an hour out of the film. 5 days b4 the release he was killed. Space mite be the final frontier but its filmed in a Hollywood basement.
When you're a famous director you do what you want or you don't make the movie. Isnt it interesting how making entertainment pays better than doing things that people need to be done- aka essential work. Its not their fault. It's literally our fault. We endorse it. We don't want to pay teachers better but we'll absolutely pay to see the next Marvel film. 🤷♂️ Imagine a world where teachers dictate the terms of how they teach. Crazy.
Kubrick...one of a kind. Never be another. I have his taschen Napoleon book...its massive. I flipped through it several times and read the script. It would have been badass. Same with A.I. but he gave it to Spielberg.
I have never been able to reconcile the picture of the earth rising when they were on the moon how small it was -- more like what the moon looks like from Earth. It should have looked absolutely HUGE.
It looks small because there is nothing on the surface to create a true sense of scale . I try to enjoy the night sky at work . I notice the moon looking very small as I cross a huge flat parking lot , 20ft buildings visable at a great distance . During my first break , the moon will appear even smaller as I look out past the parking lot and lack of buildings . During lunch the moon has moved over our campus and looks much larger because other objects appear closer to the moon
You're correct, the moon is slightly larger than 1/4 the size of earth, .27% actually, so the earth is roughly 4 times the size of the moon and would appear as such viewed from the moon. I've argued this point for years, it's the same distance either way, but one object is 4 times the size as the other, and earth would appear to be 4 times the size of our moon if viewed from the moon. Imagine the harvest moons we see in the summer, it's a pretty big ball in the sky, and you can easily make out craters/features on the moon, now imagine if it were 4 times that size, it would be HUGE! Many photos/video taken of earth from the moon don't seem to show the earth that size, I've seen a few that get close, but you'd be able to see all continents easily, you'd easily be able to see the city lights, it would be such an awesome scene you know someone would of put a "web cam" on the moon so we could view the scene anytime we liked, but no one has ever done that, maybe there's other things they've never done.
Another thing that isn't correct to scale, is the dirt they kicked up running around on the moon with their toes and the rover. If the gravity of the moon is 1/6 that of earth, than dust kicked up by a toe would fly up 6 times higher on the moon than it does on earth, video of the astronauts running around kicking up dirt, shows that dirt doesn't get kicked up high at all and falls quickly back down, even dirt off the rovers tires falls quickly to the ground, "for every action there's is an equal and opposite reaction", well that "reaction" would be 6 times greater on the moon, if you're toe kicks up dirt a foot high on earth, it would be kicked up about 6 feet on the moon and it would take 6 times longer to fall back to the ground, and fine dust would be floating all over. They claim on the moon you could hit a golf ball miles cause of lack of gravity, how come the dirt/dust they kick up doesn't even go feet?
@@danthomas9077 sorry but I don’t get how the earth can look 4 times bigger than the moon when standing on the moon. It’s 250,000 miles away and distance makes things look smaller🤔 I’m no scientist but I would have expected the earth to look quite a bit smaller from 1/4 million miles away
My favorite movie of Kubrick is the masterpiece "Barry Lyndon". The cinematography of that movie is nothing short of amazing given the time in which it was made and was filmed with all natural lighting of the period. No other movie I've seen captures the feeling of a time period quite like Barry Lyndon (with the lone exception being Ridley Scott's "The Duellists".)
There's something with a magazine that Jack Nicholson's character is reading before his job interview, I think it's a Playboy issue where they talk about pedophilia and stuff
they did know about them the belts were discovered in 1958. and in 2012 2 dedicated probes were sent out to study them. Their suits absolutely had radiation protection because the sun emits radiation. Solar winds affect the belts and i believe only in "space storms" can the belts be dangerous.
3:25 “because it’s so strange we never went back”?! Why do people always say that? We went back to the moon five more times. Getting to the moon is expensive as shit. NASA has budget cuts. We learned enough about the moon at the time to satiate our curiosity. It’s cheaper to share the cost with other countries on the space station performing scientific experiments than justifying another trip to the moon. Occams Razor
in regards to the book describing how awesome the stars looked vs no memory of them in person, its easy to imagine a publisher telling them to add some color to the story telling
No… it’s just two different questions being answered. The ACTUAL question was asking if they could see stars through the sun’s corona. Which was just one of the experiments. This stuff all gets a little easier to explain when “truthers” aren’t lying their asses off.
A clockwork orange is one of the craziest movies I have ever watched, easily my favorite movie by kubrick. If any of you have not watched it I highly recommend!
Beckon Power Station in East London doubled up as the Citadel of Hue. Have been to both and can't see how anyone would think about making Hue in Beckton
@@arkie_bear Owen Benjamin, really? I had no idea he’s a MIT trained astrophysicist, an authority on space flight. I thought he was just an unfunny comedian and full time Qanon grifter.
There is one piece of evidence that proves what we saw televised and in photos was not filmed on the moon, and it is irrefutable. The lunar lander had a rocket engine pointing straight down in the center underneath the craft with 80,000 lbs of thrust they had to use to set down. It would have made a crater bigger than the lander itself and would have thrown up so much dust it would have been everywhere. Yet, the dust under the lander is undisturbed, no crater, no dust, even the gold foil on the feet of the lander are shiny and clean. They may have gone to the moon, but they didn't do it in that ship or in those photos.
The thrust of the vessel is not turned up to 80k lbs the entire descent. As the lander descends, the thrust starts at a full burn to reduce the speed of the lander and take it out of orbit. The lander then slows its speed down gradually, both vertical speed AND its horizontal speed (it just left an orbital velocity of ~2,040 miles per hour). As the lander uses up fuel (which is heavy and a significant majority of the vehicles total mass) the lander also becomes significantly lighter, as the entire vessel is designed form the get to to have utilized almost all of its fuel before landing so it weighs less and then requires less fuel expenditure for the finer adjustments in the final descent (hence there is a "point of no return" window during initial descent). As the landers speed becomes slower, it requires less and less thrust to maintain that speed. By the time the lander has began its final descent window, the lander is only moving at 1.12 miles per hour (0.5m/s) and given its current mass at the time of touchdown only required a little bit over 1000lbs of thrust to maintain the ~0.5m/s speed for a safe landing. When you consider that the landing module had a max thrust output of 45000N and 1000lbs thrust is roughly equivalent to 4,448.22N, the engine was firing at only 10% of its power. In addition to all of this and you can visually observe exactly where the minor amount of rocks/dust were displaced in a line along the path of its last few feet of landing (the lander was still moving horizontally before touchdown) in many of the photos of the landing site (i can link you the one you can see it the clearest on if you would like) (and some math too) Apollo stack, LM + CSM = 46 tons, only the LM landed on the moon. LM had two stages, ascent (get crew back to command module) and descent (the thing you said needed 80k lbs of thrust). Ascent stage had a mass of 4.7 tons fully fueled Descent stage had an empty mass (fuel used up) of 2.0 tons Total landed mass of the LM was 6.7 tons. It had a mass of 6.7 tons on landing, and since lunar gravity is 1/6th of Earth, only ~1.1 tons of thrust was needed the last 50 meters before landing
That was definitely faked nasa is pretty much one of the biggest scams that ever happened the reason they never go back or plan too is now they understand with the type of cameras that exist now you can see everything too perfectly clear it's easy too fool a bunch of people with blurry images now that we can really see what's going on they domt dare take images of the moon with these modern cameras right but people are still stupid enough to believe this happened
@@marettmrc I think most understand there was a throttle. The spirit of his assertion still stands. There is so much more to that piece of footage as well. All of it, everywhere has problems and the footage of the trip is one of the biggest challenges to NASA's credibility. Pivot points of men in 'space suits' lining up exactly where cables would be used in their training, some footage slowed down for effect and the jump heights are no different than a person on Earth, other times they are jumping higher. People literally receiving help from cables getting up after having fallen over, There's bullshit everywhere, even the 'Moon' rock that Neil Armstrong gave to Amsterdam was fake. It was petrified wood.
the weirdest thing was a nasa guy saying we have lost the technology to go to space. my phone has more processing speed than the entire nasa complex back in 1960
IDK. I’ve watched that clip, and IMO, I read his statement not as “we can’t ever go back” but as “we don’t physically have the technology and would have to re-engineer it all” which is true. Just my thoughts. There is plenty though to leave one wondering…
@@coderexe30 Yep. Dumb people like to take the words outta context. A few of the reasons we haven’t gone back is money. People can’t fathom we were in a stupid technology race with other parts of the word and there was a lot of manpower, time and and money dumped into the project. What that guy means and others when they say the technology can’t be replicated is; There wasn’t exact plans for plenty items as a lot of things were hand made and modified pretty much as they went. It’s not like there’s cad drawing of all the stuff. Most people would be able to comprehend the complexity of just the engines alone, it’s no wonder they can’t get a handle on the whole thing. Advanced technology has always baffled primitive men. People saying their phone has more computing power than the shuttles don’t know what they’re talking about just repeating what they heard, and there’s videos in b&w on yt from the national archives I believe showing all kinds of the technology and testing incoming which is only a fraction of the whole.
I think they say that because the technology was improvised by all the top tier scientists and mechanics and therefore not really a single plan was made. I dont know what to think of it but thats the explaination given
Missions to the Moon have been conducted by the following nations and entities (in chronological order): the Soviet Union, the United States, Japan, the European Space Agency, China, India, Luxembourg, and Israel. Russia has plans to go back this year apparently too. Thats a lot of lying to keep alive if you ask me.
Aeronautical Engineer/scientist, Albert Taylor, spent almost two decades evaluating satellite system designs & multiple government classified programs (including the Star Wars & the F-117A Stealth Fighter programs) at major aerospace companies in southern California. This lead him to be hired by NASA to work on the International Space Station Program. When he was asked by Art Bell about the moon landing, he replied: "When I saw the landing craft, there is no way I would ever get in that thing. It was way too flimsy."
"Apollo Program" Producer: Walt Disney deceased at that time. Co-producer: Wernher Von Braun. Director: Stanley Kubrick Art Director: John Hoesli. Writer: Arthur C Clarke. Photographer: Geoffrey Unsworth. Total cost = 169.51 billion current dollars.
Hi Rogan I was wondering if you could go ahead and talk about hydrogen III and how it could be a clean nuclear energy and how a lot of countries in the world are partaking and going back to the moon so recently
I'm saying it on every video. Please get Thomas Sowell on the podcast while he's still around! He's in his 90's.
Joe should have done that when he was still in California. Be very hard to drag Thomas Sowell out that far now.
@@sirrathersplendid4825 zoom
Sowell would be great
You mean the guy whose spews a philosophy that creates a society that only cares about the self instead of the collective? yeah fuck that guy
@@platypuss619 The politicians trying to "take care" of people using tax dollars and government programs are keeping people in poverty. The goal for them is not to help. It's to keep people down so the politicians can buy their votes later.
“It's Easier to Fool People Than It Is to Convince Them That They Have Been Fooled.” - Mark Twain
Right not that is so true. Trying to shine some light on the things goin on to someone and they just won’t believe it
Joe doesn't believe that bunk he's too big to admit it though.
Jesus...haven't heard that one before in a CZcams comment section quote cemetery...
@@ryublueblanka I actually haven't, thank you very much lol.
Thats right, like 98% of people will think im crazy if i told them hollywood and the music industry and the news is casting spells on you to keep you asleep. Keep your eyes closed.
The young boy with the apollo sweater on, my mother designed that sweater in 1969 and it was sent to Dr Gilruth who passed it onto Neil Armstrong. My mother was the fastest knitter in the world at the time, Gwen Matthewman. The sweater now resides in the history museum in Ohio US. The pattern for the sweater was released in late 1969 by Lister and that's how a copy ended up in the movie.
Nice.
Cool facts. !!! & connection. Hey can I order a few sweaters and some winter hats.
YOUR MOM KNEW LUCKY LUCIANO.....THAT SWEATER WAS KNITTED FOR MY BROTHER BUT I WOULD WEAR IT.... SMALL WORLD
My mom does molly
@@judd0112 Unfortunately mum died in 2014 aged 86
After seeing how they bs'd us all about covid I've begun to question everything
question everything. Including Religion and god
Been onto these scammers since the 50's and 60's
Did the Germans really start WW2? Try why did some outfit declare war on the Germans in Mar 1933! That's why Hitler had a certain crew locked up, just as the US locked up 100's of 1000's of the Japanese community after Pearl Harbor
History is the Greatest lesson in life, never forget it
Question everything and believe nothing.
@@rickmcgillivray6154 Great start, now start some deep reading , the Banned stuff
@@velociraptorblue866 God helps you see clearly.
Stanley Kubrick was ahead of his time. Eyes Wide Shut is literally what is happening in the world right now with the Epstein/McAffee cases
👁
It is?
maybe he was ahead of his time, maybe he knew the people who were planning society
Charlotte Iserbyt, whistle blower, author of “The Dumbing Down of America...,” senior policy advisor of Reagan’s BOE, stated that, “If you want to know what goes on in those “meetings” watch “Eyes Wide Shut.”
@@jamestown4867 And I can't remember which Kubrick movie it was, but they removed lots of parts that were to revealing either without his approval or after his death.
kubrick hated hollywood, he hated the film company executives so much he would do anything to avoid having to work with them which is why he made most of his movies in the uk.
Look up
Elon Musk meets Post Malone
It’s too funny!
That’s why he made “eyes wide shut” exposing the Hollywood elites. And he died a mysterious death like a week after filming, and supposedly a whole lot of the film was cut out and lost forever to no choice of his own
@@dr.penguin9412 that last part isn't true. He did deliver a final cut to Warner 2 days before he died, just needed some post production stuff done.
@@hipsterelephant2660 I heard there were things removed from the final cut though. Could be BS though. Idk
@@dr.penguin9412 His constant reference to Rainbows in eyes wide shut
Interesting, the founder of NXIVM had schools called Rainbow Cultural Garden
Even more Interesting. The term where the rainbow ends, comes from the Ancient Occult
belief, that, if you offered a child up to Moloch, you got to keep any gold or jewels that was found
at the end of the rainbow. Of course in ancient times, they actually believed there was gold
under the rainbow. Today, we know, its a trick of the light.
Joe “changed” his mind about the moon landing hoax when Spotify handed him the check.
Amen
No he was on record way before that saying he changed his mind but keep posting brainless shit lol probably a flat earther to
Way before
That's not true
Deep.. its all fake bro yea
Rest in powerful peace Stanley Kubrick 🙏
26 July 1928 ~
7 March 1999⚘
A director so damn good, he fooled the world, that's what I call talent.
Joe Rogan gets interviewed a lot
Underrated comic
The Joe Rogan Experience
Have you seen the video
Joe Rogan gets mad at Alex Jones
It’s too fucking funny!! 😂
@@StarBright818 no i will look for it
...New world order led by obama and pope francis is coming. Jesus christ is coming back for the rapture. Get ready. Dont believe the coming ufo alien abduction narrative
"They got Stanley Kubrick to fake the moon landing but he was such a perfectionist he insisted on shooting it on the moon".
Have you heard Joe Rogan’s song
Elk Meat & DMT
Look it up, it’s hilarious!!
I smoked weed inside my local in my recent CZcams video 👀
winner of best comment today🏆
czcams.com/video/dRXTMrjJtjg/video.html.
czcams.com/video/dRXTMrjJtjgy/video.htmly
“Space may be the final frontier but it's made in a Hollywood basement.”
🌶
Do you believe Alderaan is real too?
2001 was released before the first Apollo landing and Kubrick's depiction of the Moon's surface differs greatly from its appearance in the Apollo footage. The movement of characters on the Moon in 2001 differs from that of the filmed movement of Apollo astronauts, and does not resemble an environment with 1/6 the gravity of Earth.
dude stop spaming. you are having the opposite effect of what copy pasta you are doing.
Gee, a TV show about exploring “space, the final frontier” was made in Hollywood. Totally mind blowing!
4:41 Rogan cracks me up when his guest tries to detour from the conversation Rogan wants to have. "Nixon bombed Cambodia!" "Yeah," then goes back to his train of thought.
We need to raise Thomas Sowell to the forefront while he is still around!!!
lol Sowell is a joke, he can't do his thing in a room where people ask actual questions
@@davelebowski2859 You obviously have never seen him with a full panel asking him questions. Biden was there before in the 80's with him, making no sense (Biden). What you have said is not true or fact, only what you feel, which is worthless. You make up things to say so you feel better. Pathetic.
@@davelebowski2859 there are more vidoes of him doing live debates in front of audiences than i can count
@@davelebowski2859 There are plenty of videos of him with an entire panel and he demolishes everyone of their claims.
On the forefront of what? More tax cuts for the wealthy?
Kubrick was one of those crazy genius type of guy
he almost has a masterclass movie in every genre
Look up
Joe Rogan gets mad at Alex Jones
It’s hilarious! 😆
Go find Jay Meyers docu on eyes wide shut.. His CZcams channel was shut down with 400000 subs.
He is very good.. 👍
@@funart6210 no
One of those sure
facts
Fifty three years ago we went to the moon but cannot do it today? This is a disconnect in logic. The press conference is unbelievably depressing when it should be a celebration.
Fake as can be
True
@@seanpratt4704 And totally PROVES Rogan is Controlled opposition. ...the young, hip, cool, "happening" dude, that everyone "loves", ...to sell us a MOUNTAINOUS AVALANCHE OF HORSESH!T! Same with Russell Brand! Theyre both PUPPETS of the satanic globalists!
Thank you. Cheers!
@TurnedLeftAtTheRockyMountains Lost
the film Capricorn One always fascinated me
I approached 2001: A space odyssey thinking it was going to be some 1960s star trek level production and man was I wrong. The flick blew my mind.
I've always heard people talk about it. I have to check it out
Could have been edited down to 45 min. The movie would have been twice as good if the ape scenes were removed completely
The classic Westworld is legit
@@LiGhTfOoT_
Its one of those movies especially in the space sequences that make you feel like you're high on drugs its a hypnotic ambient experience that you'll never forget.
2001 blew a lot of minds back then, including mine. The special effects compared to everything else at the time was literal witchcraft. '69 was also the last year for Star Trek. Coincidence?👀🤣
On the set of dr. Strangelove Kubrick had so accurately depicted the cockpit of the B-52 he actually got a visit from the government because the specs hadn't yet been declassified.
My cousin who worked on one said that the most accurate cockpit in a movie is that movie
@@emperortrevornorton3119 Kubrick basically recreated the cockpit from a small snippet of a magazine photograph that showed a small section of the guages, etc. Kubrick, with the help of aviators and experts, then filled out the rest of the cockpit how they believed it would look. They were basically spot on.
Reminds me when Tom Clancy got a visit from the government because of how accurate depictions were in Hunt for Red October and his other books
Woah that's cool
Hey ... where's major Kong?!
The Apollo missions should have brought a state of the art 35 mm or 70 mm motion picture production camera.
And ... the starscape would have appeared even better than those on top of Mount Everest at Night; except that such starscapes would have been visible in daylight on the moon because there is no atmosphere scattering of sunlight. The moon has no atmosphere. Why were no photographs taken of starscapes directly overhead using a shaded lens to block sunlight reflected off the regolith, and in the shade of the LEM, on a tracking tripod, with a long shutter exposure? Answer: That would be even harder to fake with enough precision to fool even an amateur astronomer; let alone thousands of them.
And yes, the Earth and moon are spherical, space is a hard vacuum, and rockets are able to work in space by following Newton's Laws of conservation of momentum ... unlike a certain magic bullet I can still recall. We need to all live longer to grow wise to all the b.s. propaganda myths we are spoon fed from birth.
Telomerase, Cannabis, and Iv3rm3ctin For All!
Worldwide General Strike and Cease Fire!
Hey CZcams! Don't ...
Hay joe I love to watch your podcast. I learn a lot thank you. Sandy
A must watch Capricorn one 1978 movie. It’s free on CZcams
He forgot to mention NASA deleted the records because they needed space to store stuff
How about the guy who was doing a house clean out for someone and found all the copies of NASA Footage in a basement along with NASA electronic equipment. And the fucking dummy called NASA and they immediately picked it all up, and told him he could keep the old equipment, and never spoke of what was on all those reels, many claim it was all original unedited footage of moon landings, alien edits, et artifact edits, god only knows. We get a chance and anyone of us would upload it all online but this scared “do Gooder” fucked it up. Nobody knows where or how all those shelves of original footage ever ended up in that old basement and til this day NASA hasn’t said a peep about what they recovered.
Yeah, the calculations are no longer there because they deleted or destroyed all of that information? A woman Katherine Johnson who was apparently brilliant did all the math. Don Pettit literally says we can't go back because we don't have the technology. Search him on here. Is so strange that we go backwards with this specific technology with the stupidest explanations as to why.
@@Redhotlugnut do you know what? She didn’t do any math, she done all the meth! You ham and cheese melt!
The world has lost a ton of data and historical TV, because magnetic tapes were so expensive they were constantly reused..
But I guess we also lose a lot with hard drives, that we also rewrite over these days.. :)
watch the documentary "american moon". i guarantee it's legit and not crazy shit.
I swear, I've never listened to Greg Fitzsimmons' stand-up but I love everytime he's on JRE. It's like reconnecting with an old friend.
He's good on Carolla too.
@@amc78 will check it out
He looks like a sheep dog trainer
I always wondered why he was on joes podcast
Fitzsimmons is the man!
Funny how we supposedly went to the Moon 50 years ago but haven't been back since despite having 100X better technology.
Hmm...
China, USA, India, Isreal, Japan, Europe, have all sent multiple missions to the moon since 2005.
China successfully landed (unmaned) missions on the moon in 2013, 2018 & again in 2020 and now have a couple of kilos of moon rock back their Earth labs from the 2020 mission.
India & Isreal missions crashed landed on the Moon in 2019 (lander missions failed)
USA (one with South Korea) have 3 separate moon orbit missions happening right now.
There are 20+ more known missions including multiple landings planned by all the above and others like Australia, Canada, UAE, Turkey, Ukraine, UK, Mexico, Netherlands, Europe and more in the next couple of years.
@@rfgson
They're all in on it.
It doesn't surprise me at all. It cost a lot of money, they won the cold war, people were losing interest. There's only renewed interest coz the us is falling behind china
@@rfgson im not gunna let you get away with that comment are you hoping no one will fact check you, the us have a problem with there rocket so no they havnt gone anywhere they apparently want to send an unmanned rocket to the moon to make way for another one later on with astronauts. If they have been there whats the need for that. No one ever has landed and will never land on the moon
Exactly
"...it's so strange that we never went back."
Except, Joe, that we went back five more times, plus one attempt (13).
In before Neil DeGras Tyson invites himself back on the show to "Set the record straight"
so joe, the earth is a pear shape and nothing to see in tropical nazi antartica
@dont tripbot It's because of Neuschwabenland. The Nazis supposedly built a base in Antarctica that was rumored to have a tropical climate. Theories about this range from Nazis discovered the hollow earth to Nazis used the base to build the UFO like bell crafts and then escaped to the moon.
DMT>NDT
@dont tripbot seek and ye shall find
Nah im good
Kubrick is the director that all directors want to be.
Kubrick died 2 weeks before eyes wide shut premiered on ”heart attack” …. It pretty much confirms everything
" Kubrick is the director that all directors want to be. "
What? Dead?
Was
@@peterpoop7760 Or "Even more respected and famous after he dies".
@@sthubbins4038
Dying is a very short-sighted way to become "even more respected and famous" don't you think?
The difference in moon walking "quality" between missions could be, yes the 1/6 gravity, but NASA even had a training program on how to walk on the moon. Astronauts reported how difficult it is, how center of mass can not be controlled, so a training program on how to actually walk on moon was started since first mission. Perhaps learning different body mechanics, not even natural at first, led to improvements(?) So the later missions do look more fluid.
The allegory of the cave
.
.
Yeah you watched them fly a tin can with 1/,1,000,000 of our current computing power.
On your black and white TV with rabbit ears antenna.
On the first attempt.
Grow up.
They also redesigned the suit and later landings had a lot more time to get used to it.
Calumet was an Indian Tribe, also a city in Northern Michigan it was the name of a baking powder in the pantry in the Shining.
@TurnedLeftAtTheRockyMountains Very true! The outside of it was Timerline Lodge at Mt.Hood Oregon, but the interior was? I'm not sure. peace.
It's also a VERY Mega Important term in Secret Masonic Practice..., I daresay.., Friend to Friend .
“Space is the final frontier, but it’s filmed in a Hollywood basement”-rhcp
The great composers of history will live on forever. Beethoven, Mozart, Chopin, and Anthony, John, Chad, and Flea...
It’s space may be....
@@edgarallanpoe8917 🤘🤣🤣🤘
Imagine see John Frusciante on JRE
@@yuvalpeleg6269 needs to happen.
Joe: A thing was never just a thing
Greg: wow
😂😂
The truth is that Kubrik did film the moon landings. However, being a perfectionist, he filmed it on location.
Lmao what a plot twist
Apollo Flight Director Gene Kranz recounts these simulations in his book, Failure is not an Option:
'In the late 1960s our simulation technology had progressed to the point where it became virtually impossible to separate the training from actual missions. The simulations became full dress rehearsals for the missions down to the smallest detail. The simulation tested out the crews and controllers responses to normal and emergency conditions. It checked out the exact flight plan, mission rules, and procedures that the crew and controllers would use for a later flight.'
In 2003 History Channel documentary of the same name: Kranz said: The simulations were so real that no controller could discern the difference between the training and the real mission.
That is actually what I have said and thought about Apollo 11. Once I saw a picture of the training facility and you couldn't tell the difference. I also am aware that many false flag events happen with simulation training so the others can't tell the difference of what is real or not such as 9/11 and the London train bombings.
Yeah that means projecting digital coordinates and flight paths, not Pixar type shit.
Except gravity. lol
Dat 2 year old walking up the stairs in the hoax thing
So they think they went but they didn't??
I feel like I’m listening to Joe Rogan back in 2013
only partly, usually it went on for a couple hours...this short is a let down, but a nice reminder.
Me too.
...and it feels so good
Glad to see Joe Rogan is still a low-key moon landing skeptic
You could just say glad to see Joe Rogan is still an idiot it would be less wordy
Guess they should make questioning the moon landing illegal, to prove its right
@@godsmarine5734 this guy gets it lmao
@@kenh.5903 grow up toy
@@kenh.5903 bro knock it off bubble boy.
Joe, sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. They went , they landed , they came home .
No, the shadows aren't right and the flag looked like is was moving so it must be fake...LOL😂😂😂
@@lennyanders1639 Basically sums up the Moon landing denying cultists “arguments,” lol.
Stanley Kurbrick died just before the release of Eyes Wide Shut. Kubrick died 19 years after The Shining
Chris, Kubrick died on March 7th,1999. Eye's Wide Shut release date (July 16th, 1999). As for July 16th, that was the 30th anniversary of the Apollo 11 Launch, (July 16th, 1969.) As for Kubrick, his death, (March 7th), was 666 days before January 1st, 2001....
At any rate, we have Kubrick, Apollo 11, Eye's Wide Shut, & 1-1-2001 ( The 666 days.)
Back to ''The Shining'', (which is also about Elites.)
In a scene showing an overhead view of the Maze, if you look hard at it a certain way, you can see what looks like the numbers ''444'', right in the center of the Maze. As for the movie, The Box Office Sales for The Shining came in at $44.4 Million, (444.) Between Kubrick helping NASA, we have the Elites, Child Sexual Abuse, (In both The Shining & Eye's Wide Shut.) And also a lot of Numerology, all tied together...
The Shining gets creepier every time I watch it. It’s like a fever dream that evolves each time.
You've watched Shining more than once?
Fucking psychopath! 😂
I agree... Eminem has a hidden track in his cd that you can only hear of you are delereous
Scariest movie ever
The freezer exit reversing gets me‼️
@@DougieBarclay I love Shelly
I wonder if any of us bigfoots will ever get to go to space one day
Chewbacca did... I think you will too.
Us shape shifting dragons are already on it!
I will find you
@@robert4you u win
You don't exist
you should check " The Killing " thats a good movie and Dr Strangelove
If anyone could have faked the Moon landings then Stanley Kubrik would probably be the man to pull it off.
Fact
The funny thing is that everyone says this, but it's not quite accurate. He would be the guy you would want to put it all together - well, except that you would have some very intense moments with astronauts gripping the side of their seats and their eyes rolling back in their heads. But all joking aside, the guy you would want would be DOUG TRUMBALL. He is the ONLY one who could have pulled it off. But even with Trumball's genius, the effects would suffer the same fate as all FX of the time - the fact that they don't age well. As much as people may argue, this simply hasn't happened with the moon footage. Otherwise, we would have movies at that time with that level of "FX" in them. We don't.
Oh it's more than idle speculation. The story I heard is that when he was making Dr Strangelove....he needed to recreate the bomber/cockpit for filming. He went to the G and asked for access. DENIED! He then proceeded to scrounge up every photograph in LIFE and LOOK mags and any source he could locate with any partial pictures and perfectly recreated the plane on his own. This is what put him on their radar.
@@dvnobles Kubrick got himself on their radar when he reconstructed a bomber perfectly for making Dr Strangelove. Later NASA gave him a one-off lens to film Barry Lyndon in candlelight. BTW - have you seen i pic of the lunar module lately? That "tech" didn't age well. It looks like it was made from a child's Erector Set and a roll of tinfoil.
@@ACZcamsUser12345 what, the moon landing? haha. ok.
Stanley Kubrick was arguably the best Director ever known to Hollywood Cinema, but the man was absolutely insane. He was talking to the key grip of one of his moves while driving. He crashed his car into a ditch mid conversation and didn’t even react. He just kept talking about the movie
also a huge asshole but artists are complicated people
Does that sound like a true story?
@@IsaacTheSalsaShark fuck it, it is now - i'm telling everyone that story from here on out
Stanley Kubrick was just another horrible human being who left a mark on an Industry because he was there to do it first.
@@IsaacTheSalsaShark Lol it could be, because a "crash" doesn't mean cars flipping and engines exploding. It could have easily been a nick off of a pole.
Joe "I really like that hat!"
Fitzdog "Yeah, I found it in a garbage can outside The Comedy Store, the day after the 2016 election. I had to wash it because it smelled like elk and weed.""
🤣🤣🤣
Thank you, Bill Burr 😂
@@dashiit1748 LMAO OK THAT WAS ACTUALLY REALLY FUNNY!!
ZING!!!
I see what you did there, you little rascal 😉
The guy who stayed in the craft Would have seen the best stars of anybody When he went around to the dark side of the moon The sunlight would have been completely gone The stars would have been amazing
Yup, Michael Collins saw them just fine. The question landing deniers cut out of their cherry picked clip was if they could see the stars through the corona of the sun. Try doing your research.
@@UpperDarbyDetailing Um Yeah it would have been A 2 or 3 hour clip This is just a snippet And I am talking about what they talked about in the snippet They actually talked about a lot of stuff So what I said is spot on You are talking about something that's not in the snippet🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
@@UpperDarbyDetailing This is a clip from a Joe Rogan show I do a lot of these little clips Do some research
@@oldcountryboy yes… my point that flew over your head is that that snippet was deliberately cut to make it look like Michael Collins said he didn’t see any stars. Like I already said, do your own research.
@@UpperDarbyDetailing No it wasn't this is the Joe Rogan channels on CZcams they make little clips all the time Do some research
Stanley was a genius and his movies snitched everything in this world and ever took planes when he ain’t want too
2001: A Space Odyssey is a decent indication of what Hollywood special effects could do at the time - and it’s extremely shonky. It genuinely was simpler to film on location.
Joe: "he (Kubrick) was into some weird shit"
Also Joe: vapes psychedelic frog sweat inside his sealed psychonaut chamber
+p
Joe is a toad licker? I recall an "astronaut" on a talk show saying moon landing was filmed in New Mexico.
Lol
I am not sure Joe has ever done 5meo, he talks about DMT a lot, but usually NN DMT. That does not come from the toad, they are two totally different things.
@@Truthshouldalwaysbetold get ‘em King
I read the kid didn't even know he was in a horror movie bc Kubrick was protective of him
Directing is an art just like a painter, da,vinci and other artists hid knowledge in they're works, so it makes sense that Kubrick did also..
We miss you on CZcams Joe!!!!
It's insane how well 2001 holds up. Just watched it for the 2 billionth time last night
Did you ever read the book? It has pretty decent amount of extra detail in it. Pretty neat
@@nbzz5539 Books always do. "Contact" was phenomenal compared to the movie. And I liked the movie a lot.
@@hydraxc2478 I didn't know there was a book for that, Thanks for the heads up. Also I'm def not watching Dune until I read it lol
It hasn't dated as badly as the moon landing, that's for sure.
Calumet means peace pipe. One of the sub themes of The Shining was about the slaughter of the American Indians. Remember, the Overlook hotel was built on an Indian burial ground.
I grew up in Calumet Michigan and I’ve never heard that????However I believe there was a peace pipe with the Indian in the town mural
Have you heard Joe Rogan’s song
Elk Meat & DMT
Look it up, it’s hilarious!!
Herd that somewhere too! I'm sure it was Indian ground.
Nice catch, I'm gonna rewatch.
@@313barrygmail There's also a Calumet city in Chicago.
Remember
Salem's Lot.
There's a Salem in nearly every state. Wonder why ?
Don’t forget about Danny’s sweater in The Shining, it had the Apollo 11 Rocket on it
That is the only reference to the moon landing in the entire movie.
I like this type of conversation that Joe was talking about. It's fascinating. If only Stanley talked about why he did that. Did anyone ever interview him about it?
Nobody ever did because Stanley did not and COULD NOT possibly have faked Apolo.
Al you have to do is watch his movie"2001"; His rendering of zero-g, and of the Moon do not look like the real thing.
NoboDy had either the technology or the knowledge to fake Apollo; NOTE THAT TO THIS DAY, NO CONVINCING SIMULATION OF THE APOLLO LUNAR SURFACE EVA'S HAS EVER BEEN MADE.
Do you think that poorly made one was done purposely to give more virility to the moon landing?
@@1carpentrys No. I think Kubrick did the best he could with the technology and information he had, and he succeeded in making one of THE best movies ever made.
I also think it is perfectly obvious, for reasons too numerous to even list, that Apollo was not faked, and certainly not faked by Kubrick.
Kubrick was an absolute perfectionist and demanded no restrictions on the process and the content of his movies. Some claim he ran into some G intemperance when making Dr Strangelove and 2001. Some say he made a deal with the G to produce something in exchange for free reign.(Later NASA gave him a unique lens to film Barry Lyndon). It was a deal he forever regretted which why he put all kinds of hidden clues in The Shinning...Danny's Apollo 11 sweater, Tang on the storage shelves, A11 work and no play etc. Some say it's why he made Eyes Wide Shut as an expose (we didn't get to see Kubricks intended/uncut version as he died suddenly right before it was released).
A year after watching the Shining I get dropped off at a fly-in remote lodge on Lake Clark Alaska in the winter. Closest community of 12 people is a 10 mile walk across a frozen lake. The guy helping me drop my stuff off asked me if I was afraid of ghosts because the lodge was built on an old Indian graveyard and there had been caretakers there who claimed to see their ghosts as well as the ghost of a woman who tripped on float plane dock and got decapitated. I must admit my mind strayed to the movie a few times in the months I spent there and wished I hadn't seen the movie.
That must have been creepy as hell 😲
that's called 'television *programming*'
Well..did you see anything?
Haha i was working in Ireland and the job took longer, sowe booked into a local hotel we found online, The Montague.. sounded cool. We arrived, looked a nice place, once inside, still looked cool.. once we were booked in and being shown to our rooms, the long very dated corridors, gave me an overwhelming feeling almost complete dankness. Exactly like the shining, once in the room, the door was flimsy like it had been kicked in, there was glass on the mattress under the sheet, I refused to stay, something didn't feel right, and I trust my gut... We left and booked into one down the road , few days later on a job, radio said the Montague had now been closed and was to be used for immigrants to Ireland, shootings and crazy shit happened there that's why was shut down . Really weird place, still get shudders thinking bout it..
I bought a house in Nova Scotia and my god upstairs it was so like the Shining- houses talk for sure
Joes knows exactly what eyes wide shut is about 😂
LMFAO
Tax exemptions?
That’s why Kubrick died :(
His homie Epstein.
I watched it. I can't grasp the point. Care to explain?
So much information to speak of here joe
Piece of Art 🎭
Calumet is baking powder, my mom used it back in the 70’s.
I watched full metal jacket being filmed. It was shot at Beckton gas works in East London just around the corner from where I lived. It's also where the famous Jean Michel Jarre concert "destination docklands" was held in 1989. I sung in the choir that night along with a couple hundred other kids from poor East London schools (the famous fashion designer Lee Alexander McQueen was standing next to me as we went to school together). There's videos on here where I can watch myself aged 13 singing by Jean on a floating stage lol. One amazing night I'll never forget. We had a pretty awesome childhood for poor East London kids.
ive still got the vhs of docklands show.
@@daveelson213 haha good times 🤭 the part where I'm on camera is when they walked 300 of us kids onto stage with our red life jackets which we all hated cos they smelt horrible and sweaty. I had bushy curly hair back then and was standing next to Alexander and a massive black lad that I remember being bigger than my dad 🤣 to this day I still see lazers and fireworks when I close my eyes and I'm sure my crap hearing is to do with that amazing night 😆
A lot was also filmed at ATR Bassingbourn where I did my phase 1 Army training
I had a poor Dagenham childhood which was sweet as.
thanks for sharing friend
Still waiting for that poor camera guy that filmed the "shuttle" taking off from the moon to be rescued lol
Look up
Joe Rogan gets mad at Alex Jones
It’s hilarious!!
no one ever wants to talk about that lol but it's a "conspiracy theory"
how about i can lose a call on my cell phone a mile away from the person im talking to but they can make a clear call to the whitehouse from the moon
donnie brasco Is this a serious question?
@@donniedoesdishes exactly. back when we had rotary dial phones...
In a lot of kubrick films he shows some reference to the moon landings
Thanks
Joe "I'm not saying I'm in the camp... But I'M IN THE CAMP" Rogan
I was eleven yrs old and I recall the commentator explaining as the flag was planted that it was a stiff or springy material so that it would appear to wave.
Yet somehow that was missed by theorists who use the waving flag as another piece of evidence.
Joe advocated for lockdowns and masks, then he left CA to get away from it.
He’s a simpleton and easily manipulated. He trusts those “officials” who get in his head because he’s too stupid to discern fact from fiction, and therefore is not in that camp.
He would believe in leprechauns if an Irish scholar told him they exist. Remember Bigfoot? He’s an old man with the intellect of a child.
He definitely is. Joe ain't stupid!
The fact that we haven't been back to the moon, in my opinion is the greatest evidence that we have never been there.
Humans (China) just went to the moon a few years ago… and they (China) have no plans to go back
Go back for what? It's a rock, there's nothing there...
well 1. it's expensive 2. it's a barren land
Me too, considering todays technology, we could be drinking on the moon on weekends and go back on for work on Monday
I've only been to Canada once. Guess I never actually went lol
Who filmed them leaving the moon in the lunar module? Watching that Lunar module leave the moon was like watching an original Godzilla movie
A 16mm colour movie camera was used from the cockpit of the lunar module, on descent and lift off, and for some footage of the moonwalks. Additionally on Apollo 15-17 the tv camera on the lunar rover was left running and pointed at the lunar module to film the lift off from outside.
How big was a television camera back in 1969? And what power source would be running to this camera after everyone takes off?
@@chrisschwarz5569it wasnt a TV camera. It was a specially-made Westinghouse camera which was about 26 cm long. It consumed 6.5 watts of power at about 30 volts.
@@chrisschwarz5569Ever heard of something called batteries? When the crews of Apollo 15-17 were about to leave, they positioned the TV camera infront of the LM. Since the camera was running on batteries, it just kept running until the battery was empty.
The direction of the camera could be controlled from earth (for example like a rovercamera on mars would), so thats why the camera could pan up when the LM launched. If you look carefully, the first time they did this the pan up doesnt work out. Since there is a radio delay from earth to moon, the engineers directing the camera basically have to pre move the camera to stay with the LM. No one actually standing behind a camera would make that mistake.
The thing abt Kubrick is that his movies are “tome poems” George Lucas talks about them. They’re movies that force the actors and dialogue to take the back seat and let the other elements tell the story
Clicked faster than NASA erased the original moon landing tapes
Why would they do that?
@@goead ask em
@@goead Because there was more than enough footage of the original landing so they reused the tapes on other missions. For whatever reason, maybe they were cataloging missing stuff or something, they put out a request to see if anyone had them laying around which started a search through the archives and they concluded it was reused. It wasn't a big deal but people go "ermaghed they lost the tapes".
@MMA vs BOXING Stop shilling this crap, top review of the book is: stop spamming this book in the youtube comment section
@@ChucksSEADnDEAD - “More than enough footage”. Who are you kidding? Probably the most important event in human history and they have too much footage of it? What a joke.
I’ve heard the Library of Congress is an absolute disaster, and everything is misfiled and all over the place, so I could believe an American organisation screwed up, but not that they deleted it because they had too much footage.
About 30 minutes was cut out of Eyes Wide Shut, and Kubrick "died" after he showed his cut of the movie to the studio.
Must have been pretty bad
Apparently it was a 8 minute segment of his cut that started a huge argument between Kubrick and the exec's.
There's enough symbolism in Eyes Wide Shut to understand what Kubrick was saying. It's true. These people run the world.
@@DIVISIONINCISION in the movie, the way they knew everything Cruise's character was up to, makes me think they were an intelligence agency. Or had ties to.
That movie was Kubrick telling the world that the world is run by a cabal of satinists
@Frank Dux Funny because the whole Epstein thing had me immediately thinking about Eyes Wide Shut.
Full Metal Jacket was filmed in Becton, East London .
The man in charge of risk assessment for the entire Apollo program was Joseph Shea, a Ph.D level Engineer from New York. He was hired by NASA around 1963.
In 1967, his team of mathematicians, engineers, rocket scientists, medical doctors and meteorologists, nearly 30 professionals, made a determination of the chances for a successful Apollo moon mission.
Keep in mind, the NASA administrators required a 99.75% chance of success, before they would green light a launch.
Along those lines, NASA cancelled the Space Shuttle program when they recalculated the risk assessment. Prior to 1986, NASA calculated the risk of catastrophic mission failure was 1 in 100,000. After 2 Shuttles mission failures, they determined the risk was 1 in 100 or 1%. And that was too high.
Joseph Shea concluded in 1967, the chance of failure ( death of the entire Apollo crew) would be 95% per each launch. At least 10 crews, he concluded, would die before 1 landed on the moon.
That was bad news for NASA.
They had already spent more than $25 billion of taxpayers money into what was clearly a lost cause.
By 1968, the clock was ticking.
In April 1968, Stanley Kubrick released 2001 A Space Odyssey. As luck would have it, the high IQ genius who had helped Kubrick over the past 4 years, to make that movie, was Arthur C Clarke.
Clarke was a key advisor to NASA and friends with the very top NASA people in the Apollo program. He is seen in photos with top NASA administrators in the mid 1960's in London.
According to the film producer, Bart Sibrel, ( hated by NASA and trolls on all message boards ) he was leaked information that a staged moon landing was done in New Mexico at an Air Force base, under the eye of LBJ and other top military and gov officials.
It appears the editing of the film took a long time and might not have been completed until mid 1969.
What is important to note about Stanley Kubrick is that he had invented the Front Screen Projection film technique of backdrops, and it is obvious NASA folks used that film technique, to make black backgrounds in the scenes. Today, it looks very fake but NASA had no other option at the time and never guessed the film would be viewed millions of times by independent researchers.
The Bart Sibrel film - " A funny thing happened on the way to the Moon "offers proof after proof of the hoax. It can still be seen on YT.
One question folks will often ask, after seeing the Bart Sibrel film is, " If NASA faked the moon landing, wouldn't Russia would tell the world ".
That is a good question. Consider what Russia would get from that worldwide statement. Nothing.
Russia is smart. After all, they were 4-5 years ahead of NASA when they ended the moon mission program, after realizing the radiation barriers were IMPOSSIBLE to penetrate.
Russia was way too smart than to yell, " America is lying."
They blackmailed Nixon.
Some of the blackmail payoffs are known because they were too big and too obvious to hide from anyone. However, there is a good chance a lot of the blackmail package remains secret, and perhaps 90% of it remains unknown. But that is why Russia kept quiet in my view.
Military base 'Cannon'.
Director...Emeneger.. .
@@paolojoosten6353 Ok, got it. Thanks.
@@maxsmith695 A former military police man in his death bed , tells his son about the making of the 'moon landing film at Cannon.
This son who is now on in his death bed , terminal sick , tell this on camera.
At Cannon , 2 hangers became one big studio.During that time renovations were going on.
The trucks with props like sand did not stand out.
This MP was given a list with 15 names.
These people only , han entry to the studio.
Among them...:
Emeneger , Armstrong , Van Allen , Von Braun... .
Do you think this is legit?A hoax?
By the way..English is not my first language.. .
I am Belgian.
@@paolojoosten6353 moon landing is 100% a hoax. The confession is real. LBJ declared in May 1968, he was not running for President in Nov 1968 election. He would not be in office in jan 1969, so he was not too worried about the moon landing hoax. Nixon is likely the person who gave the permission of NASA to fake it. Nixon was very unpopular in the summer of 1969 for carrying on a war in Vietnam nobody could explain. I was in a campground the day it was made public, July 20, 1969. Many campers had a radio and listened. Afterwards, nobody bothered to even talk about it. Back then, most people, maybe 99% assumed it was real. By 1985, a growing voice was saying it was fake. After 1995, videos on CZcams began showing all the fakery and professional photographers said it was fake. Those 12 men who say they walked on the moon were kept away from public audiences. Only Bart Sibrel and a few others were able to bring forth a lot of evidence that it was fake. Today in America 75% of adults call it fake.
@@maxsmith695 Okay.Thx.
Every time Joe talks looking up he's talking to his DMT elves
Bruh 😂😂😂
😄😃
Funny
I keep asking my DMT elves to bring me pizza but they are no fucking use at all.
I used to play on the site where FMJ was filmed in Beckton East London.
Oof. Private "Pyle" killin himself really messed with my head as a preteen
Was gonna quote an Ermey line but knew it wouldn't get past youtube censor
That documentary, I think it’s called Room 237 is really interesting, especially the moon portion of it.
Fact: the real reason the room number was changed has nothing to do with Apollo. The hotel they used for some of the shots requested they use a fake room number because they were concerned about losing business if people saw the movie and refused to stay in the room.
FMJ, filmed in Beckton, east London.
Well "experts" still think that covi was born in a wet market.
Yea no chance it came from a lab funded by the NIH....
Title: *"2018: Fauci on resuming gain-of-function research funding. Its just as Rand Paul said"*
czcams.com/video/BXB-Nt5kV1U/video.html&ab_channel=SILVIEWmedia
Riiiiggghhtttt
It wasn't just with Full Metal Jacket, Eyes Wide Shut was also completely shot in England. Kubrick didn't want to (and at that point probably couldn't) go to New York so he sent people there to take photographs of a couple streets and had them entirely rebuild as sets, lol.
That movie's budget was $65m where like $12m went to Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman and rest went to building entire streets of New York. Some scenes where Tom Cruise walks through the streets aren't even him on the set but a rear projection. I wonder who OK'd such a high budget for a movie where a couple people at a time talk to each other in a room and didn't question for what exactly do they need the extra 50 million, haha.
In Kubricks odyssey he said he thinks the government gave Kubrick unlimited access to make movies in return for filming moon landing footage.
They figured it out alright, that's why they had him killed
the end.
@@ETAisNOW yes free rein in hollyweird but after eyes wide shut they cut an hour out of the film. 5 days b4 the release he was killed. Space mite be the final frontier but its filmed in a Hollywood basement.
When you're a famous director you do what you want or you don't make the movie. Isnt it interesting how making entertainment pays better than doing things that people need to be done- aka essential work.
Its not their fault. It's literally our fault. We endorse it. We don't want to pay teachers better but we'll absolutely pay to see the next Marvel film. 🤷♂️
Imagine a world where teachers dictate the terms of how they teach. Crazy.
At least we got to see Nicole Kidman naked and for that, I am eternally grateful
Kubrick...one of a kind.
Never be another.
I have his taschen Napoleon book...its massive.
I flipped through it several times and read the script.
It would have been badass.
Same with A.I. but he gave it to Spielberg.
Talk about Holomodor, too.
I have never been able to reconcile the picture of the earth rising when they were on the moon how small it was -- more like what the moon looks like from Earth. It should have looked absolutely HUGE.
It looks small because there is nothing on the surface to create a true sense of scale . I try to enjoy the night sky at work . I notice the moon looking very small as I cross a huge flat parking lot , 20ft buildings visable at a great distance . During my first break , the moon will appear even smaller as I look out past the parking lot and lack of buildings . During lunch the moon has moved over our campus and looks much larger because other objects appear closer to the moon
You're correct, the moon is slightly larger than 1/4 the size of earth, .27% actually, so the earth is roughly 4 times the size of the moon and would appear as such viewed from the moon. I've argued this point for years, it's the same distance either way, but one object is 4 times the size as the other, and earth would appear to be 4 times the size of our moon if viewed from the moon.
Imagine the harvest moons we see in the summer, it's a pretty big ball in the sky, and you can easily make out craters/features on the moon, now imagine if it were 4 times that size, it would be HUGE!
Many photos/video taken of earth from the moon don't seem to show the earth that size, I've seen a few that get close, but you'd be able to see all continents easily, you'd easily be able to see the city lights, it would be such an awesome scene you know someone would of put a "web cam" on the moon so we could view the scene anytime we liked, but no one has ever done that, maybe there's other things they've never done.
Another thing that isn't correct to scale, is the dirt they kicked up running around on the moon with their toes and the rover. If the gravity of the moon is 1/6 that of earth, than dust kicked up by a toe would fly up 6 times higher on the moon than it does on earth, video of the astronauts running around kicking up dirt, shows that dirt doesn't get kicked up high at all and falls quickly back down, even dirt off the rovers tires falls quickly to the ground, "for every action there's is an equal and opposite reaction", well that "reaction" would be 6 times greater on the moon, if you're toe kicks up dirt a foot high on earth, it would be kicked up about 6 feet on the moon and it would take 6 times longer to fall back to the ground, and fine dust would be floating all over. They claim on the moon you could hit a golf ball miles cause of lack of gravity, how come the dirt/dust they kick up doesn't even go feet?
@@danthomas9077 Is there any good source of this type of information about the moon landing potentially being fake
@@danthomas9077 sorry but I don’t get how the earth can look 4 times bigger than the moon when standing on the moon. It’s 250,000 miles away and distance makes things look smaller🤔 I’m no scientist but I would have expected the earth to look quite a bit smaller from 1/4 million miles away
My favorite movie of Kubrick is the masterpiece "Barry Lyndon". The cinematography of that movie is nothing short of amazing given the time in which it was made and was filmed with all natural lighting of the period. No other movie I've seen captures the feeling of a time period quite like Barry Lyndon (with the lone exception being Ridley Scott's "The Duellists".)
It bored me to tears.
@@Veggamattic It's not everyone's cup of tea. We all have different appreciations and attention spans.
greatest film ever made save the rules of the game. it's just unreal. thank you, mate.
GREAT MOVIE, BUT TOO MANY SLOW ZOOMS.
@@johnnyViDeO The man had just purchased his first zoom out camera, and was determined to get his money's worth. He sure got his satisfaction.
Greg is very Yes-And, and has Joe's back- I like it. Great conversation.
It’s was Battersea power station south London
I delivered timber & became an extra
Gi in the back ground some where
There's something with a magazine that Jack Nicholson's character is reading before his job interview, I think it's a Playboy issue where they talk about pedophilia and stuff
It’s a playgirl mag, helps set up what the movie is really about regarding the real relationship between Danny and his father
@@dws0828
what do you mean with that?
.. was there incest 👀?!!
@@nlom3520 absolutely. Watch any of Rob Ager's analysis of The Shinning. Jack sexually abused Danny.
@@HunterVex.
wow, i didn't know that!!
tnkss for answering 👍
@@nlom3520 👍 Rob Ager rules!
It’s funny that they didn’t know about the radiation belt when asked and there space suits didn’t have any protection 😄
NASA discovered a third belt in 2011 kinda wonder why Apollo didn't discover it in 1969.
@@wesporter2176 That’s simple, things does exist until you discover them
@@dorianoddi3452 So... why didn't Apollo discover the third belt they have radiation monitors right?
they did know about them the belts were discovered in 1958. and in 2012 2 dedicated probes were sent out to study them. Their suits absolutely had radiation protection because the sun emits radiation. Solar winds affect the belts and i believe only in "space storms" can the belts be dangerous.
@@wesporter2176 3rd belt was temporary and they knew about the belts in 1958.
3:25 “because it’s so strange we never went back”?! Why do people always say that? We went back to the moon five more times. Getting to the moon is expensive as shit. NASA has budget cuts. We learned enough about the moon at the time to satiate our curiosity. It’s cheaper to share the cost with other countries on the space station performing scientific experiments than justifying another trip to the moon. Occams Razor
Thomas Sowell , a must have guest!!
He was good in the Outsiders. Stay gold, ponyboy.
Kubrick was brilliant, one of the best directors ever.
Wasn't so brilliant if he died, now was he?
@@patstaysuckafreeboss8006 ?
@@patstaysuckafreeboss8006 he hated black people so he was alright by me 👍
Have you heard Joe Rogan’s song
Elk Meat & DMT
Look it up, it’s hilarious!!
czcams.com/video/dRXTMrjJtjg/video.html...
Hey Joe, or your team, a humble plea from all your listeners here.
PLEASE GET Randall Carson and Graham Hancock back on the show :D
in regards to the book describing how awesome the stars looked vs no memory of them in person, its easy to imagine a publisher telling them to add some color to the story telling
The Apollo missions were overseen by the military for a reason.
He said the moon landing hoax was his masterpiece of fraud.....F E truth..Joe rogan knows that the earth is flat and motionless
No… it’s just two different questions being answered. The ACTUAL question was asking if they could see stars through the sun’s corona. Which was just one of the experiments.
This stuff all gets a little easier to explain when “truthers” aren’t lying their asses off.
The kids jumper also had a rocket with 11 stitched into it
Eyes wide shut is definitely the most sophisticated of all his works.
He got killed because of it
Ever since I saw that movie I kinda got obsessed with trying to find the truth about those satanic ritual parties among celebrities and elites.
why kill him and then release it? why not destroy the footage in some way
No
That’s not even his version
Never released the actual directors cut
A clockwork orange is one of the craziest movies I have ever watched, easily my favorite movie by kubrick. If any of you have not watched it I highly recommend!
That movie was absolute nonsense..and I loved it
Um it is up there, but trainspotting is twisted.
@@taY_Ler-MaDe that movie was all kinds of disturbing emotionally
Beckon Power Station in East London doubled up as the Citadel of Hue. Have been to both and can't see how anyone would think about making Hue in Beckton
Greg Fitzsimmons has a great voice for silent film
The moon landing looked like they used a Jiffy Pop instead of a legit spacecraft.
🤣
As Owen Benjamin says, "The lunar lander looks like a meth head's tree fort." There's no way in hell that thing was on the moon.
Arkie Bear oh, well, if the picture of clean mental health Owen Benjamin said it, it must be true.
Look up
Elon Musk meets Post Malone
It’s too funny! 😂 😆
@@arkie_bear Owen Benjamin, really? I had no idea he’s a MIT trained astrophysicist, an authority on space flight.
I thought he was just an unfunny comedian and full time Qanon grifter.
hahaha i respect tf outta joe for STILL keeping it free flowing, informative, and pretty funny.
bot
There is one piece of evidence that proves what we saw televised and in photos was not filmed on the moon, and it is irrefutable. The lunar lander had a rocket engine pointing straight down in the center underneath the craft with 80,000 lbs of thrust they had to use to set down. It would have made a crater bigger than the lander itself and would have thrown up so much dust it would have been everywhere. Yet, the dust under the lander is undisturbed, no crater, no dust, even the gold foil on the feet of the lander are shiny and clean. They may have gone to the moon, but they didn't do it in that ship or in those photos.
The thrust of the vessel is not turned up to 80k lbs the entire descent. As the lander descends, the thrust starts at a full burn to reduce the speed of the lander and take it out of orbit. The lander then slows its speed down gradually, both vertical speed AND its horizontal speed (it just left an orbital velocity of ~2,040 miles per hour). As the lander uses up fuel (which is heavy and a significant majority of the vehicles total mass) the lander also becomes significantly lighter, as the entire vessel is designed form the get to to have utilized almost all of its fuel before landing so it weighs less and then requires less fuel expenditure for the finer adjustments in the final descent (hence there is a "point of no return" window during initial descent). As the landers speed becomes slower, it requires less and less thrust to maintain that speed. By the time the lander has began its final descent window, the lander is only moving at 1.12 miles per hour (0.5m/s) and given its current mass at the time of touchdown only required a little bit over 1000lbs of thrust to maintain the ~0.5m/s speed for a safe landing. When you consider that the landing module had a max thrust output of 45000N and 1000lbs thrust is roughly equivalent to 4,448.22N, the engine was firing at only 10% of its power.
In addition to all of this and you can visually observe exactly where the minor amount of rocks/dust were displaced in a line along the path of its last few feet of landing (the lander was still moving horizontally before touchdown) in many of the photos of the landing site (i can link you the one you can see it the clearest on if you would like)
(and some math too)
Apollo stack, LM + CSM = 46 tons, only the LM landed on the moon.
LM had two stages, ascent (get crew back to command module) and descent (the thing you said needed 80k lbs of thrust).
Ascent stage had a mass of 4.7 tons fully fueled
Descent stage had an empty mass (fuel used up) of 2.0 tons
Total landed mass of the LM was 6.7 tons.
It had a mass of 6.7 tons on landing, and since lunar gravity is 1/6th of Earth, only ~1.1 tons of thrust was needed the last 50 meters before landing
Blue Ghost Six brought the receipts. lol
That was definitely faked nasa is pretty much one of the biggest scams that ever happened the reason they never go back or plan too is now they understand with the type of cameras that exist now you can see everything too perfectly clear it's easy too fool a bunch of people with blurry images now that we can really see what's going on they domt dare take images of the moon with these modern cameras right but people are still stupid enough to believe this happened
LOL!
@@marettmrc I think most understand there was a throttle. The spirit of his assertion still stands. There is so much more to that piece of footage as well. All of it, everywhere has problems and the footage of the trip is one of the biggest challenges to NASA's credibility. Pivot points of men in 'space suits' lining up exactly where cables would be used in their training, some footage slowed down for effect and the jump heights are no different than a person on Earth, other times they are jumping higher. People literally receiving help from cables getting up after having fallen over, There's bullshit everywhere, even the 'Moon' rock that Neil Armstrong gave to Amsterdam was fake. It was petrified wood.
Ciao Joe from Windsor Ontario Canada just south of Detroit Michigan USA!!!
the weirdest thing was a nasa guy saying we have lost the technology to go to space. my phone has more processing speed than the entire nasa complex back in 1960
IDK. I’ve watched that clip, and IMO, I read his statement not as “we can’t ever go back” but as “we don’t physically have the technology and would have to re-engineer it all” which is true. Just my thoughts. There is plenty though to leave one wondering…
@@coderexe30
Yep.
Dumb people like to take the words outta context.
A few of the reasons we haven’t gone back is money.
People can’t fathom we were in a stupid technology race with other parts of the word and there was a lot of manpower, time and and money dumped into the project.
What that guy means and others when they say the technology can’t be replicated is;
There wasn’t exact plans for plenty items as a lot of things were hand made and modified pretty much as they went.
It’s not like there’s cad drawing of all the stuff.
Most people would be able to comprehend the complexity of just the engines alone, it’s no wonder they can’t get a handle on the whole thing.
Advanced technology has always baffled primitive men.
People saying their phone has more computing power than the shuttles don’t know what they’re talking about just repeating what they heard, and there’s videos in b&w on yt from the national archives I believe showing all kinds of the technology and testing incoming which is only a fraction of the whole.
I think they say that because the technology was improvised by all the top tier scientists and mechanics and therefore not really a single plan was made.
I dont know what to think of it but thats the explaination given
I heard that too I don't understand
Missions to the Moon have been conducted by the following nations and entities (in chronological order): the Soviet Union, the United States, Japan, the European Space Agency, China, India, Luxembourg, and Israel. Russia has plans to go back this year apparently too. Thats a lot of lying to keep alive if you ask me.
Aeronautical Engineer/scientist, Albert Taylor, spent almost two decades evaluating satellite system designs & multiple government classified programs (including the Star Wars & the F-117A Stealth Fighter programs) at major aerospace companies in southern California. This lead him to be hired by NASA to work on the International Space Station Program. When he was asked by Art Bell about the moon landing, he replied: "When I saw the landing craft, there is no way I would ever get in that thing. It was way too flimsy."
He seems to be a guy who abandoned his training and went of into the land of woo-woo crazies.
I wouldn't either. Those Astronauts were braver than I could ever be.
That's why the astronauts who flew in those things had to belong to a generation of men that I don't believe we will ever see again...
@@mattthelearner2797 romanticization to the extreme. People take on more crazy odds everywhere everyday around the world.
@@misterharryman Not to the extreme, to the amount that is worthy of the achievement.
"Apollo Program"
Producer: Walt Disney deceased at that time.
Co-producer: Wernher Von Braun.
Director: Stanley Kubrick
Art Director: John Hoesli.
Writer: Arthur C Clarke.
Photographer: Geoffrey Unsworth.
Total cost = 169.51 billion current dollars.
Hi Rogan I was wondering if you could go ahead and talk about hydrogen III and how it could be a clean nuclear energy and how a lot of countries in the world are partaking and going back to the moon so recently