Joe Rogan's worst misinformation yet, with RFK Jr.
Vložit
- čas přidán 8. 08. 2024
- Patreon: / drwilsondebunks
I rarely read CZcams comments these days, so if you want me to see your comment, here is how you can contact me directly and I will be glad to respond to you when I can: Email: dr.wilson.debunk@gmail.com
Facebook (direct message): / docwilsondebunks
Rotavirus vaccine information: ourworldindata.org/rotavirus-...
Basics on checmical context: www.assda.asn.au/technical-in...
What the peer-reviewed scientific literature says about the safety oof Thimerosal: www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056...
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...
publications.aap.org/pediatri...
www.ajog.org/article/S0002-93...
www.thelancet.com/journals/la...
publications.aap.org/pediatri...
www.chop.edu/centers-programs...
Thimerosal effects on cells in a dish: www.sciencedirect.com/science...
Adjuvants have been extensively safety tested over several decades: www.sciencedirect.com/science...
www.sciencedirect.com/science...
www.sciencedirect.com/science...
Tdap has not been pulled in the US: www.healthline.com/health/adu...
DTaP and encephalitis: www.sciencedirect.com/science...
Extensive safety profile oof DTaP, Tdap, and other vaccines: nap.nationalacademies.org/cat...
Every first vaccine has been tested in placebo-controlled trials before going to market:
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34780...
www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056...
aasldpubs.onlinelibrary.wiley...
www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwr...
Childhood vaccines have been incredibly impactful when it comes to saving lives and preventing suffering: publications.aap.org/pediatri...
Guide to vaccinology: www.nature.com/articles/s4157...
Measles statistics: www.cdc.gov/measles/downloads...
Polio paralysis rates in India before vaccines: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...
Breusewitz v. Wyeth case that RFK Jr. misrepresents: www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/U...
Kennedy himself is suing Merck in a frivolous lawsuit over their HPV vaccines, Kennedy knows he is lying here: www.law.com/dailybusinessrevi...
More information on the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program: www.theatlantic.com/health/ar...
Why we vaccinate babies against Hep B:
www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/hea...
journals.lww.com/jcge/Abstrac...
Vaccines don’t cause autism:
autismsciencefoundation.org/w...
www.acpjournals.org/doi/full/...
www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJM...
nap.nationalacademies.org/cat...
It really is a better understanding leading to more autism diagnoses:
www.scientificamerican.com/ar...
www.statnews.com/2022/02/10/t...
Autism rates are actually similar across generations: jamanetwork.com/journals/jama...
European childhood vaccination coverage: www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/b...
--Description continued in pinned comment--
---- Description (sources used) continued ---
Cell phones don’t cause brain tumors or damage the blood brain barrier: www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/radiation/cell-phones-fact-sheet
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bem.20702
www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165017310000718?via%3Dihub
Why you should get vaccinated even if previously infected: www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-04865-0
www.cell.com/cell-host-microbe/fulltext/S1931-3128(22)00159-7
www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abg9175
More on germinal centers: www.nature.com/articles/s41577-021-00657-1
Ivermectin doesn’t work for COVID:
www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2115869
jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2797483
bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12879-021-06348-5
jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2789362
Vitamin D doesn’t work for COVID:
journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0267918
www.bmj.com/content/378/bmj-2022-071230
jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2779952
How influenza causes secondary bacterial pneumonia: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6642581/
AZT is an inhibitor of reverse transcriptase: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC386922/pdf/pnas00325-0322.pdf
Anti-retroviral cocktails save lives: ourworldindata.org/art-lives-saved
Christine Maggiore’s story: www.latimes.com/local/la-me-christine-maggiore30-2008dec30-story.html
Some pharmacovigilance of COVID vaccines: www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(22)00054-8/fulltext
drive.google.com/file/d/1_wHIYX-tGkGBPwuax7N8BxZPR4PTTCDm/view
www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2110475
The 1976 flu vaccine story: www.history.com/news/swine-flu-rush-vaccine-election-year-1976
The FDA is not “funded” by big pharma (CORRECTION: second source here should have been included in the video): www.forbes.com/sites/johnlamattina/2018/06/28/the-biopharmaceutical-industry-provides-75-of-the-fdas-drug-review-budget-is-this-a-problem/?sh=6bc1186549ec
www.nature.com/articles/nbt.2786
Basics of Autism: www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/autism-spectrum-disorder/symptoms-causes/syc-20352928
www.spectrumnews.org/news/new-studies-reveal-how-autism-might-alter-synapse-formation-pruning/
Song used for outro: Fan-made piece
Blah blah blah. Go debate
OK Dr. Willson just a little question about "drinking chlorine... " I understood the larger point you were trying to make and of course I agree ... but ... just how do you drink a gas 😅? pretty sure you would die from the effects of inhaling it first.
Also, your stomach isn't going to break down chlorine gas into hydrochloric acid, your stomach produces hydrochloric acid and a thick layer of mucus which is why your stomach doesn't digest itself. However if you swallow large quantities of hydrochloric acid you're going to have problems. But many of our medications are compounded with small amounts of hydrochloric acid.
@@paulacoyle5685 There are multiple states of matter and also solutions and mixtures. Such as chlorine tablets used for pools.
@@paulacoyle5685 go try it then
@@bobroberts8500 Joe rogan viewer right here jajaja.
It's real easy to sling mud. it's much more difficult to clean up the mess.
Dr Hortez approves this comment.
@@MessiahNonEstIt's "Hotez", and you're clearly embarrassed that he has credentials and education (and human decency) you can only dream of.
Both sides can say the exact same thing you said. That’s why it’s extremely important to research both sides with extreme thoroughness, and not listen to one side alone, or with bias. Bc it is very difficult to clean up messes.
@@diandian9827 nah it’s dOc Whore-tez .... he who wears a comedy white coat & has a magnifying glass on his desk, so you can deffo 100% trust him ! 😂
09:12 They did not tested whether aluminium accumulated in the body, they only tested blood and hair…if aluminium accumulated in the central nervous system, would have they been able to find out ?
10:05 RFK is talking about DTP, not DTaP. He is not lying.
15:17 well if they got sued and lost money…weren’t they in the wrong ? Shouldn’t they be winning their lawsuits if their vaccines were effectively safe ? Isn’t it how justice work ?
18:34 How do you catch hepatitis B ? No one argued about the severity of it, just the way it’s transmitted.
20:00 Have you wondered why the studies always focus on ONE vaccine, as if they were taken in a vacuum ? You are expected to take more than 50 in your life, where are the studies that compare longitudinally vaccinated and unvaccinated people for overall health ? (Those studies exist by the way like Hooker & Miller)
These are all good points. I don’t think everything said in this “debunking” video is just not convincing. It’s interesting that they ended up removing Thimerosal from most vaccine anyways. The statements don’t really add up to me… we determined it’s safe, but want to remove it as a precautionary measure. doesn’t really check out to me.
Thank you for being you know, actually intelligent
I'm interested in hearing where you got claims 1 and 2 from, especially the second. Bobby doesnt cite sources very often, other than the Johns Hopkins uni graphs, so where can I read about the DTP vaccine? And are you sure they arent talking about the same vaccine? Seems to me like the one that dr Wilson was talking about was the exact same (the "a" seems to be short for "and". "Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis" vaccine versus "Diphtheria, Tetanus, and Pertussis" vaccine).
It bothers me a lot that you didn't acknowledge the other stuff the guy in the vid pointed out. I'll to say the same for the things he himself didnt talk about, that were featured in the original podcast. None of this is gonna stop me from voting RFK (all the way), since he is very libertarian and only wants to research this all further. However, I think peddling conspiracy theories like these (to the extent that they are conspiracy theories) is very harmful to the trust people need to have when it comes to medicinal advice and other science.
And for the last thing you said, he did in fact mention what you are looking for at 19:54. The very first link he shared under "vaccines don't cause autism" is about an experiment that did test with multiple vaccines. They used 4 sets of vaccines, showing no correllation. Most of the relevant text is on page 3, but you might as well read it all, its only a few pages. copy and paste in your browser or click the link in the description
czcams.com/users/redirect?event=video_description&redir_token=QUFFLUhqbjc3a1pzNUF1cEtxanNoSmRNMWJ2bEliVkhfd3xBQ3Jtc0tuakRacGZvWVJsVl84TlZJWE40bkNQRmxTck1Hb1dUVTk0VEtMWFFEZWFQcWFUZ3lMOUh6MHItZnVBXzVkajdBY2llWU9lVUl2OFRROGY5bElSTEJXU0Z3aWxqQUlteWQwU2JwUUJIWVVuLWZNZzhUbw&q=https%3A%2F%2Fautismsciencefoundation.org%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2019%2F03%2Fvaccine.2019.pdf&v=sugCJNAPF9o
They did not "tested" - you lost me there
At 6:07 you note that "pretty much all the mercury is excreted" and from that you draw the conclusion that ethylmercury is safe. This is an incorrect way of reasoning, because it may be the non-excreted mercury that does the damage.
From the 2002 "Three Faces of Mercury" paper by the University of Rochester in New York by the Department of Environmental Medicine:
"Ethyl mercury converts to inorganic mercury more rapidly than methyl mercury, but the latter produces more brain damage."
I direct you to the 3 papers cited in the 2 minutes before this time stamp you have here (three separate trials looking at neurological outcomes in fairly large population trials), rather than this descriptive paper you cite that has a few case reports of ethyl mercury exposures in much higher doses with a completely different method of ingestion (a serious of ivig infusions and plasma infusions). Those three papers aren’t just higher order types of data (larger sample size, an actual testable hypothesis, etc), they are also published after this 2002 paper you cite
@@ziachoudhury4769 Thank you for the papers. I have no challenge to their shared conclusion (i.e. that cognitive impairment is not associated with low-level thimerosal exposure in children). However, this conclusion is not the same thing as saying that ethylmercury is safe (the 2nd paper says as much in its conclusion).
There are large studies that draw the same conclusion for methylmercury exposure in children (e.g. Llop 2016, Myers 1998 & 2020, Patel 2019, Stratakis 2020, Vejrup 2022). However, I think you would probably agree with me that such studies do not provide a basis to say that methylmercury is safe.
As one of the papers that Wilson cites says: "no controlled studies of low-dose ethylmercury toxicity in humans have been conducted" (Hviid 2003 via Tamma 2009). This is because ethylmercury has traditionally been considered to have a similar safety profile to methylmercury (they differ by only one carbon atom), and so such controlled studies are not performed because they are considered reckless and dangerous.
Wilson's claim that ethylmercury leaves the body much quicker than methylmercury is true, but such blood-based analyses don't tell the whole mercury-bioaccumulation picture. Critically, when we look at primate models of ethylmercury vs methylmercury vaccines (Burbacher 2005), the words of the researchers note that: "there was a much higher proportion of inorganic Hg in the brain of thimerosal monkeys than in the brains of MeHg monkeys (up to 71% vs. 10%)" and that data from the "study support the prediction that, although little accumulation of Hg in the blood occurs over time with repeated vaccinations, accumulation of Hg in the brain of infants will occur. Thus, conclusion regarding the safety of thimerosal drawn from blood Hg clearance data in human infants receiving vaccines may not be valid, given the significantly slower half-life of Hg in the brain as observed in the infant macaques."
A science communicator, not a scientist only, should debate RFK
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it." -Upton Sinclair
We've got a cast of characters here. Are you referring to someone in particular?
Yup. RFKjr is a glorified ambulance chaser.
@@kawasakiwhiptwo5821 I think immediatly of John Campbell.
@@emmajones8590 What are your feelings when you think of him?
Ohhhh…..
Lmao!
I seriously thought you were talking about this guy and the entire pharmaceutical companies!
😂
More! More! More! (I yell as I smash my fists holding my fork an knife on the table over and over)
This was a really good explanation and breakdown on RFK’s claims. I’m now leaning more against his claims on vaccines. However, something that I would’ve liked to see differently is when considering if a scientist should debate RFK, the answer should be a resounding YES.
You talk about how usually the questions he asks (we all ask) have already been asked and answered by a scientist somewhere, and debated in an office, classroom, water cooler, etc. Well the average person doesn’t have access to those conversations and that’s what we want to hear. We don’t want to continue with the “trust the experts” narrative. Sure, they might be right most of the time, but we want to understand it as well. We want to have access to those conversations, that’s how we get less distrustful. And what better way to do so than to have a debate with someone who has strong opposing views on the matter.
When asked if a scientist should debate RFK, the answer should be a YES, absolutely. There should be nothing to lose if we’re doing it in the name of curiosity, science and knowledge.
That is exactly the problem. RFK debating a scientist is exactly what he wants, especially a live debate. To the viewer, it makes it appear that RFK is on a similar level to a scientist before the debate had even started. When it does begin, RFK merely needs to go outside of the scope of the scientists field of expertise, or the scope of debate. Once he does, it is very easy for him to make whatever claim he likes without fear of contradiction. This is exactly what happened with Monkton when he debated a climate scientist live. Another outcome occured with Bill Nye vs Ken Ham, where Ham used a whole array of debating tactics, fallacies, and forged evidence. As soon as anyone bothered to check the claims of Ham, they quickly found that he had made most of it up.
A proper scientific debate is a lot more rigid though. It is slower for starters. Claims always need to be backed up with sources, and every source has the time to be checked. The whole point is to expose errors and find out what is right and wrong. This is the exact opposite of what RFK wants.
@@philo3479You have no idea what deflection is, do you? It's the same topic. Funnily enough, this is also a debating tactic used during live debates.
A face to face debate is not necessary to review and debate evidence. This is regularly done in the scientific literature. RFK could also respond in video format to any of the videos made debunking him, which would therefore start a debate. So why doesn't he go ahead and do it?
I suppose you can’t smell Globalist lies then
Rubbish!Dr Martyn Phipps
Why does Apple not recommend holding your phone up to your head?
From your iPhone legal document
To reduce exposure to RF energy, use a hands-free option, such as the built-in speakerphone, headphones, or other similar accessories. Cases with metal parts may change the RF performance of the device, including its compliance with RF exposure guidelines, in a manner that has not been tested or certified.
Because of an abundance of caution. Every building, car, and business in California has a cancer warning on it. If you hold an dosimeter (reads for radioactivity) it won't read anything from an iphone. Not all radiation is radioactive. There are going to be random correlations that look like there are patterns but are just as I said random. This can be explained as "dartboard statistics" where you throw a whole bunch of darts on a barn and then draw the target after. Otherwise we have to believe that everything everywhere causes cancer.
This is essentially legalese to protect themselves from liability in case RFK types try to sue them with spurious correlations in cell phone usage and cancer rates.
Apple has probably not tested the RF frequency exposures with every single type of cell phone case out there, many made by third parties, so this is just a blanket warming against possible liability.
Though as a physicist, I cannot for the life of me imagine how even a metal case could change the RF enough to even get close to approaching dangerous levels.
Remember anything up to 300 GHz is withing safe guidelines, which is miles away from even 5 GHz, which is the highest frequencies that most cell phones use
@@ValleyDragonit even mentions some cases made of metal. I imagine they wrote this to protect them from shoddy third party companies who produce phone cases with unforseen side effects that people might blame on apple themselves.
Not that a simple metal case could possibly turn harmless radio waves into dangerous ionizing radiation, but this is a legal document, not a peer reviewed study.
If you have a a metal plate in your head
@@wallacegrommet9343 Incorrect, thats not what the guidelines say.
21:18 I was at school in the early 1960’s and neither autism or ADHD were recognised. Anyone showing signs of these conditions was considered a disruptive influence or a daydreamer or worse.
Yes, exactly this!
Where are all the 60yr olds with autism today? They should still be around at the same rate we're seeing autism in children
@@Unvaccinated69 what do you mean by autism? I worked with adults with learning disabilities including autism. We are not talking about high functioning autism such as Asperger’s, those affected people are effectively behind an impenetrable barrier. A colleague of mine was high functioning and was working as a paramedic. Autism is a spectrum of signs and symptoms. Older people could be on the spectrum but have managed throughout their lives so why would they need a specific diagnosis?
@@Unvaccinated69 Sadly, autistic people, have an average life expectancy ranging from 39.5 years to 58 years. That's why.
@@Unvaccinated69That is an unenlightened view, one of many things you don't understand is social media didn't exist, so you simply didn't hear about it, and the stigma around having a child like that kept them hidden, that is until schools were created for them, huge signs saying, Spastic Centre, and they were transported in vehicles with, Spastic Bus in big letters up the side, many were abandoned into orphanages, I spent a large part of the 70's with my Father taking abandoned children out once a month, that is where I first experienced the damage caused by Thalidomide.
He sounds like he has a frog in the throat. Is he OK? I learned that he has spasmodic dysphonia.
While kennedy was advocating for people harmed by large corporations he identifind his condition as a side affect of a vaccine ingredient.
I know you will say that there is no way to prove this. But when you live with a vaccine injury especially one that affects the way you talk or the way you see, you appreciate people who try to get to truth versus just debunking those of us struggling to find answers.
sounds good, im going to break open a thermometer and play with the mercury. Your t-shirt says you are a sciencetician so I believe you since all scientists agree on everything.
Having personally known someone who went against the government and who won 3 6 digit settlements as a result i dont believe that adjuvants were always approved. In his military service he was able to win against the courts that the FDA unnaproved adjuvants used in military vaccines almost 20 years ago did in fact cause issues in service members. Squalene to be exact and i ask you if squalene isnt the problem why is it banned now and why was he able to win his court cases against the government because of it.
At 10:25, you say that the DPT vaccine "has never been pulled" and that it never caused damage, but RFK was talking about the whole-cell DPT vaccine (which was pulled in 1996) and not the acellular DTap and Tdap vaccines you are referring to.
Also, a paper put out in 1994 by the National Academy of Medicine said that there was a lack of sufficient evidence either for or against neurological damage from the DPT vaccines. The lawsuits and accused damage were the impetus for the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act.
Acellular pertussis vac was discontinued due to fear of significant adverse effects but not because there was an actual proof of rare but significant adverse effects
Much of the impetus for this research has been the concern that pertussis vaccine could cause significant and permanent neurological damage. Recent reviews of these data do not support such an association (2) but the desire for an alternate vaccine continues because of the high rate of minor local and systemic adverse reactions following pertussis immunization .
Benefit vs risk ratio was still overwhelmingly in favor of cellular vaccine . Just that accelular was better now there are thoughts of bringing older vaccine back because of higher effectiveness .
This youtuber is a shill who thinks he's smarter than he actually is.
Unlike most politicians, at least RFK has the balls to actually stand up to the corruption in EPA, big pharma, and politics as a whole. It's wild they would rather have a dementia puppet or orange man over someone with an actual track record.
As for the the poster above me. Covid was the perfect example of politics and money, as well as twisted policies and pressure influencing the said "rarity" of negative effects and said "efficacy" of said vaccines. They also censored and deplatormed everyone and ANYONE talking negative about it or having negative experiences. Literally social media had carte Blanche to shut any account or Facebook group down. I was a part of about 5 groups that had daily events of adverse effects and doctors, out of fear refused to acknowledge these random neurological or cardiac symptoms as anything but some sudden event that was unrelated to the shot. I know personally nurses AND doctors who were fired for speaking their mind about it.
This didn't happen in a vacuum and if you think it did then you're just spreading the real misinformation.
Joe Rogan should understand the "2 Mercuries" concept very well. He wont shut up about THC & DMT being different depending on how you use it.
Go eat either mercury.
Both will kill you - This is embarrassing
like people trying to sell you a bridge.
the experimental drug is bad. no ifs ands or buts
This is a great video and hopefully serves as a good example to not only the scientific community, but all of academia. We are living in a time where science is being faced with greater scrutiny than it has in past decades. It is a much better use of your time breaking down the nuance of misinformation, rather than making outright attempts to silence it. This channel will hopefully grow an act as a voice against public confusion.
@@philo3479 Does that make RFK Jr the AntiChrist?
@@christopherrobinson7541 No, Greta Thunberg acts like one, and looks like one.
Get boosted in the fall when they tell you to order follower
His refutation of RFK's claims, are not true. None of the children's vaccines found in the schedule have been tested against true placebos in stage 3. None of them. They have all been tested against other vaccines or substances which can be harmful. Have you bothered to check it out or do you just believe what they tell you?
@cornballmcgoo7174 OK, will do, definitely preferable over getting Covid.
Thank you so much for the information. I love how you break it down. We are going through the vaccination schedule with my little one and although we’ve followed it, I had a knot in my stomach the whole time.
One question, RFK mentions in the podcast that when the did the autopsy on the monkeys who were given the same mercury found in vaccines, they found it was not being excreted from in their urine/feces but was making its way and lodging in the brain. Is there any validity to the claim?
As shown from this video you cannot believe a word that comes out of Kenedy's mouth! Make up your own mind.
Thanks for sharing. I’m in the same boat with our first kid and like you, I’ve been so anxious about it and excited to finally find a video that can offer an explanation/argument debunking RFK’s claims because they are downright scary for a new parent
I’m curious about this as well.
@karlweber470 did Kennedy ever share his source, considering he doesn't understand that different formulation of mercury cab be more or less danger or interact differently
He talked about a study, I'd have to go back to the podcast and find it, but yes, he did provide a specific study@@ASH-su6nb
Ironic that I knew a great guy with autism that his only signs of autism was some stuttering, but less than RF J.
RFK has a disorder that causes involuntary muscle contractions, causing voice to be scratchy...not related to disability
@@mikfin210 It is a disability - he can't talk properly.
he meant it’s not a mental disability, likely remembering the president who seems to be thought to have one
4:40 With regards to methyl mercury compared with ethyl mercury. The same difference is true between methyl alcohol (methanol) and ethyl alcohol (ethanol) drinking methanol even in small quantities regularly results in blindness and other conditions, whereas ethanol in reasonable quantities doesn’t.
Apples to oranges.
@@user-tf4ho2uo1e actually it’s a comparison between the two organic parts of the molecule methyl and ethyl.
I developed vaccine induced uveitis after a flu shot 20 years ago.
Could it have been mercury that caused my partial blindness?
@@MRCAGR1 That's why I find RFK Jr's mistake forgivable. The mercury actually *is* the same, just like he said. It's the chemical bound to the mercury that's different. Nobody actually calls sodium chloride and hydrogen chloride two different kinds of *chlorine.* Whoever tried to explain the issue to RFK Jr. did a lousy job of it.
@@MichaelJPartyka it's forgivable if someone corrects him on the point and he accepts the correction. If he continues to make the claim after being told why it's incorrect, then we have to ask whether it's wilful ignorance, or deliberate dishonesty.
44:12 in the U.K. most of our regulatory agencies such as the MHRA and the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) get most of their funding from the industries that they regulate. In fact the CAA is required to obtain all of its funding from the fees it charges, which includes annual airworthiness tests on aircraft. I’m not sure about the MHRA, I would think that it was 75% at least.
All these people complaining about pharma companies paying for their submissions to be assessed never seem able to come up with who should pay for it. It's kind of strange that they want pharma companies to be subsidised by having someone else pay for this process.
czcams.com/video/OpaVCTtxBnE/video.html
The media have been captured by big pharma, CNN, MSNBC, and the other big media outlets all brought to you by Pfizer, stands to reason you are only going to hear what Pfizer wants you to hear. Make them liable for their products and see the change that takes place. Pfizer are the proud holders of the largest fine for fraudulent practices, $2.3 billion in 2009. They have also admitted that the vaccines can be shed, so be careful who you snuggle up close to..
How about the billions of dollars in profits the pharmaceutical companies make. And instead of paying 130 billions of dollars to fund foreign wars we put that money towards our public health agencies… just a thought
If I had ever contracted hepatitis B, I would not have been able to be treated with the drug that has been suppressing my multiple sclerosis progression for the last six years. I actually, without realizing it, missed some of the doses - I missed half the school year in seventh grade - and didn’t realize I wasn’t protected, but fortunately, herd immunity seems to have kept me safe.
Now, I am immunosuppressed, but despite the risk to me, my ex - who is a huge RFK Jr. and Joe Rogan fan - had a veritable hissy fit when I asked him to get a full STI screening before we had sex. Despite the fact that he is a former IV drug user.
This was shocking and frankly inexplicable to me, at the time, but I guess it makes a little more sense now - ex was mainlining this bullsh*t.
Anyway, happy ending, the relationship terminated unconsummated.
Anyone else looking for that good morning guy or the one who spams that comment about lobsters in here? I was reading the comments on another video on this channel and those guys each have over ONE THOUSAND comments on his videos alone. Terrifying how obsessed those dudes are
Good god, that moron from hell was posting his cut-and-paste boldfaced/italicized nonsense within minutes of this video going up yesterday, and I wore my typing fingers out challenging him!
The lobster guy is Rab J. He's purely one of those " mythical Norwegian creatures " (YT hates the word, but if it's not obvious, search the term.) Generally, if you ignore them, they just go away.
GM1221 appears to be a genuine denier of a number of proven medical things. I really enjoy mocking him, but it's not worth engaging with him. It's impossible to win an argument with someones imagination.
@@diandian9827It was well worth wearing out your typing fingers - you did a great job! ⭐
Contact Rogan and put him straight
As much I enjoy Joe Rogan he has tendencies towards conspiracies and mysterious which is entertaining but can get dangerous when it goes to health related topics
I mean saying big pharma cares more about profit than lives isint conspiricy
I dont agree with them saying all vaccines are bad there are good ones but also bad ones
@@boneleg6952so who do you see when you get sick? That's right, them big bad dangerous doctors, who will treat you with that poison.
Health related topics?
That would be clean real food, no drugs, medicines, chemicals, GMO's, toxins...etc....etc.....That is HEALth!!
Conspiracies are crimes and nothing more..... is there something wrong with looking to see if a crime has been committed?
Mysteries...oh you bet there are..... plenty of 'em....the biggest mystery of all is how people can be so damn gullible (and stupid) to buy into taking something that does not work, because what it is suppose to work against does not in fact exist short of the theater and propaganda by their perceived overlords
Most of what he says is wrong I won’t say if it’s lies or incompetence because I don’t know for sure but it’s really dangerous because he’s the most listened to guy in the country and people will think he’s right because he’s rich that’s a huge problem with our country we think rich people are smart and moral people and we think poor or sick people are must have done something to deserve it
Thank you for this, I like JRE but I like the truth the most. We need you on JRE 😂
He lets people talk put their 2 cents in. This whole I don’t agree with so you so not be allowed to talk crap has got to stop. The problem is everyone wants to control what other people are doing and saying. If you don’t like the info change the channel. What RFK is saying is once you understand how the whole medical data system works you understand it will always side with whoever is funding it. Because they need that conclusion to generate more money for more funding. So you don’t necessarily get 100% accurate data. The data is skewed to support whoever’s funding it. Let’s say I’m a company I hire a scientist to research something for me and his findings will literally put me out of business. I’m not going to make that data public I’m gonna go hire another scientist to figure out how not to come to that conclusion. I will promise him more funding for a project that he wants in the future and the cycle continues. What the vaccine has done is made doctors that are coming up on retirement question everything that they’ve been reading for years. We’re at that level that every system is so corrupt you can’t trust anything. When do you have a system where politicians can be bought nothing is organic or legitimate it’s always gonna be skewed for profit.
This guy is too scared to debate anyone. Just sits an interpreter the way he wants. I'll debate him.
@@woodyjud7149So, lets hear it!
Peopel just need to stop watching JRE. IT's terribad.
@@beansnrice321 why is it terrible. Have you watched it
People....we need to share this video everywhere we can.
I wonder if the people that listen to RFK Jr. for medical advice go to their M.D. when they need legal advice.
Says the guy who takes medical advice from politicians
@@michaelstevenson8069 - Nope, only from qualified medical professionals.
“You’re not going to get COVID if you have these vaccinations”
“If you’re vaccinated, you’re not going to be hospitalized, you’re not going to be in the ICU unit, and you’re not going to die."
- $leepy Joey Bribe’m, 2001
@@lw1zfog - COVID in 2001? , I don't remember that pandemic but Orange Mussolini did have good suggestions for the more recent pandemic (2020) "..we hit the body with a tremendous...ultraviolet light or just very powerful light...supposed we brought the light inside the body...and I see disinfectant knocks it out in a minute and is there a way we can do something like that...by injection inside or almost a cleaning..."
Then Orange (courtroom sleepy) Mussolini admits to Bob Woodward that he knew COVID was "deadly stuff" but "I wanted to always play it down". Translation, he lied to the people he was supposed to protect.
Your fallacy is: appeal to authority.
I don't care if the highschool dropout is right and the president of NASA is wrong. Arguments stand and fall on their own merits.
Thank you for this video! ❤
And just like that your false sense of security is achieved 😇
❤
Vincent Racianello is going to record a video debunking this interview as well.
oh yeah
Vincent is too worried about retaining his NIH funding to ever be honest or objective about anything...especially in regards to Covid origins. Plus Vincent really just wants to continue to do his GOF/GOFROC research in NYC at Columbia University without any oversight or regulations.
Regardless, especially in the context of the past few years with mRNA vaccines, the "anti-vaxxer" label really just indicates that the person using it as a pejorative is either a simpleton or a shill. Why? There are a wide range of vaccine types for a wide array of virus types with a wide array of immune responses, durability, and safety profiles. So you have to evaluate each and every vaccine on its own merits.
In general, vaccines for slow mutating non-zoonotic viruses with long incubation times tend to be more effective and durable than vaccines for fast mutating zoonotic respiratory viruses with short incubation times like Sars-Cov-2. The more epitopes of multiple proteins from a virus that vaccines use, the broader the immune response with less likelihood of antigen escape. So an inactivated or attenuated vaccine using the whole virus with all of its proteins is going to provide a broader immune response that’s harder to evade than a vaccine that relies on only a few epitopes of a single protein of a virus. The Sars-Cov-2 mRNA vaccines rely on only a few epitopes of spike (S) protein’s receptor binding domain [RBD] and N-terminal domain [NTD] for its antigen. The NTD and RBD are the portions of this fast mutating single strand RNA virus that mutate the most.
Furthermore, we’ve aggrandized all the successful vaccines for viruses. Though we don’t even recognize all the failed attempts to make vaccines for a number of different viruses including Hep C, HiV, Epstein Barr, MERS, Sars-1, West Nile, Norovirus, Herpes HSV-1, etc. Vaccines are not always successful. More often they’re not.
The HIV story really got me, an effective (and sad) reality of being anti-vaccine. If that can’t convince someone then very little can. Appreciate the work DTF! 💉
Remember that folks born after the 1990s really didn't grow up with the threat of AIDS being presented to them by the MSM. The kids I know in their teens & 20's now don't even think of AIDS as a threat to them.
Two of my friends, both diagnosed HIV-positive, decided to end their treatment a few years ago. Both are still active in the community via apps like grindr and tindr. While both are passive or receptive men, thus their rates of communication are lower, it can be assumed that as their viral load increases, so will their opportunity to infect others. Not to mention the dissolution of their own immune defense. They stopped their meds at the beginning of Covid-19, and you can imagine the type of information that prompted their choice to terminate treatment. It's all likely to end in tragedy.
Atz killed tons of gays and had no benefit whatsoever. The gays revolted against fauci in the 80s.
Was Kary Mullis ever convinced that HIV was a proven cause of AIDS?
think of how many gays died because of "dr" Fauci
There's a reason why RFK Jr. is a career politician and not a career scientist. But he sure likes to talk like he's one. I give him a couple more months of "fame" until he goes way off the rails.
He's not already off the rails?
@@lindaward haha, fair enough.
Among the many other things, I wish people would stop calling it the Spanish Flu. It did not originate in Spain, but Spain was neutral during WW1 and freely reported the pandemic while other countries censored the news.
Kansas City epidemic doesn’t have the same ring to it.
True. Look to the yellow brick road. It came from Kansas (probably via pigs and started on an army base). How about we call it the Good 'Ole US Flue.
@@superclaymaster but it is a great name for a funk band.
@@paulspence7600 Interestingly thats where the new vaccine was being tested... just before all those soldiers vaccinated went off to fight in the war.
Love the T-shirt!!!!! 👍😎👍
In the Canadian review paper you cite, if 69% of pediatric encephalitis/encephalopathy cases analysed were not due to vaccination, then 31% of cases analysed WERE due to vaccination?
YIKES !!!
Yeah try again sunshine. "Overall, 40 patients (70.2%) had a more likely alternate cause for their encephalopathy or encephalitis than vaccination. In 9 patients (15.8%), the evidence for a more likely alternate cause was based only on presence of symptoms suggestive of an infective process (e.g., cough, coryza, wheeze, sore throat, diarrhea, and hepatomegaly, in combination or alone) unrelated to vaccination."
"For 3 patients (5.3%), there was evidence for an association with vaccine,"
"The remaining 14 patients (24.6%) classified as indeterminate did not meet criteria for alternative etiology or evidence for association with vaccine;"
So only 3 patients over 21 years were linked to the vaccines.
As there was about 4,891,000 children of the vaccination age by the study in 2001 and about an 87% vaccination rate which would mean that 4,255,170 were vaccinated in that time that would equate to a risk factor of 0.00007%.
You need to be on JRE for sure! Thank you for standing up.
JRE?...LOL
JR would eat him alive .. wouldn't stand a chance..
@@andrewfinlay5160 100% agree, RFK and JR would shred this guy. dr.wilson is a pharma shill, its insane how dishonest this guy is.
@@andrewfinlay5160Rhetorical effectiveness isn’t the same as scientific knowledge or being correct. Maybe it wouldn’t go well for him, still doesn’t mean he’s wrong.
Below are just some of the studies that show negative biological effects of Radiofrequency or Wifi radiation.
While Non-ionizing radiation does not carry enough energy to remove an electron from an atom or molecule that does not mean that it can't have biological effects. Near infrared light has been shown to have positive biological effects while Wifi and Radiofrequency have been shown to have neagtive biological effects.
For exampole: Wifi and RF waves have been shown to increase the amount of Reactive Oxygen Species in sperm cells which can damage the DNA as mentioned in one of the studies below. So saying that Non-ionizing radiation doesn't cause DNA damage is not true. The damage is not caused by heating from these waves because the energy produced from phones is insignificant. It is well described the possible methodology of how these Electromagnetic waves could affect our mitochondria.
You also said that the radiations needs to be strong enough to penetrate through your skin. This is now how this works. Low frequency waves tend to penetrate materials more effectively than high frequency waves. For example, radio waves (which are low frequency) can penetrate walls and buildings, while higher frequency waves like X-rays are more likely to be absorbed or scattered by the materials they encounter.
I advocate more quality studies to be done in this area (studies that do not have conflict of interest!) and to take precautionary measures against Wifi and RF waves. It is important to note that being very close to the source of radiation is unadvised.
Blood-brain barrier permeability in rats exposed to electromagnetic fields used in wireless communication (link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1019150510840)
Use of laptop computers connected to internet through Wi-Fi decreases human sperm motility and increases sperm DNA fragmentation (www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0015028211026781)
Increased blood-brain barrier permeability in mammalian brain 7 days after exposure to the radiation from a GSM-900 mobile phone (www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0928468009000133)
Exercise ameliorates hippocampal damage induced by Wi-Fi radiation; a biochemical, histological, and immunohistochemical study (www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0891061823000224)
The effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation on sperm function (rep.bioscientifica.com/view/journals/rep/152/6/R263.xml)
On one side, the biggest anti-vaxxer in the world, on the other, the most credulous side of beef humanity has to offer.
You mean incredulous surely? He seems to go more counter culture as opposed to mainstream narratives.
Those of us who follow the mainstream guidance are credulous.
@@Jason-wm5qe Credulous means "gullible."
@@MickVegas precisely. We are the gullible ones for going with the path of least resistance. Like if the New York Times says it, I trust it.
It seems like Joe is skeptical being fair to him
@@Jason-wm5qe how is him bringing millionaires grifters on most of his episodes "counter culture"?
@@Jason-wm5qe "You mean incredulous surely?" 😀
No, he meant 'credulous', you silly thing!
I see English is not your strong point either.
Thanks!
Conflict of interest. Doc has either to stop receiving money or stop propaganding his vaccines.
*_"There is no such thing as a Ministry of Truth and why it is important to challenge conventional “wisdom” - A personal view"_*
why is no one going after Kennedy for his responsibility in the measles outbreak in Somoa a few years back? Kids directly died after Kennedy's visit there a few months earlier???
I'd written this for another comment, saw yours, so I've just re-posted here
From about 2010, there was a sustained anti Vx campaign in Samoa, led mainly by traditional faith healers. Immunisation rates dropped. In 2018 2 infants were given a shot, using muscle relaxant instead of saline, with the obvious tragic consequences. The nurses responsible did prison time, Vx rates plummeted.
In 2019 they had a measles outbreak. In 6000 cases, 83 people died, 80 of them under 4 years old. You can see in those numbers it wasn't just newborns, who were not protected in 2018/2019. It took out a wide range of children, and some adults.
RFK turned up in Samoa about 6 months before the outbreak, many people blame him. But you can see he was just using the 2018 event, as an opportunistic way to get publicity. He's of course is fully protected, as are his family. It's likely he uses the A-V thing, mainly for money and fame.
But he doesn't trumpet his involvement in Samoa, or even mention it. For the obvious reason
Incidentally, Samoa had a 99% immunisation rate for CV
@@Muritaipet I know he doesn't mention it which indicates his guilt in doing as such. What I don't get is why no one else does either. It's not going to be easy for him to respond to although I am sure he's anitivaxxer supporters won't care...
@@robertchflynn I really thought Samoa would be the end of the A-V nonsense. It's so fundamentally clear what happened. I was then absolutely horrified by the nonsense they came out with afterwards, to justify why their precious fantasy was being proven wrong. That's when I started challenging them.
RFK wrote to the Samoan Prime Minister during the outbreak, and mass vaccination campaign that stopped it. He said the outbreak was actually being caused by the vaccines.
I fundamentally agree with you BTW. I'd like to see RFK do time.
@@Muritaipet Time he visited Dallas.
@@christopherrobinson7541 No comment
Watching bored millionaires like Musk , Rogan and Kennedy trying to turn science and Healthcare into a spectator bloodsport makes my blood boil.
Thanks so much for your tenacity and bravery in continuing to debunk their BS .
We ALL need to do our bit to help and it's so helpful that you explain the FACTS and the science so clearly .
Great editing also !
Well said!
Actual science is abrasive and confrontational. If you want your information to lull you to sleep, go participate in religion.
@@jonnovak6856...no? What the hell kind of science are you falling for?
@iamjustkiwi I think maybe he once got given a chemistry set for Xmas and blew up his parents house ... now he expects all science-y stuff to be packed full of drama .
Or maybe just a short attention span... who knows
@@wsouthey8606 seriously! For some reason a lot of people seem to correlate the "excitement" of something with it's legitimacy but in the real world, a lot of facts and research are just kinda dull
Why don't you go to a RFK Jr. townhall and press him during a Q&A session?
Even if I don't agree with his vaccine views, he's not going to ban vaccines, and his other views concerning out country make him more than qualified to run for president. I will be voting for him. 🇺🇸 🫡
Also, thank you for this video. You got a sub.
"he's not going to ban vaccines"
Well, that's because he can't. But he will do all he can to spread vaccination doubt through his choice of key people in government agencies, and then you get the type of things that happened in Florida, where the Surgeon-General goes in and removes key parts of an analysis in order to make the COVID vaccines look bad (the removed key parts actually made them look good). You'll get companies being unwilling to sell vaccines, meaning the US population will be exposed to various infectious diseases and the associated disruption of daily life. China and Russia will watch with a mixture of happiness and concern, as a weak America is good for them, but those infectious diseases spreading around is a bad thing for all.
You need to reassess the ethics of your choice.
@@p.w.harris9883 Do I? And whom, may I ask, are you voting for that is so much better?
@@LiveStoicism I haven't decided yet. Not Joe and Not Trump is all I can say for now. Either choice would be unethical.
Who still uses Thimiserol? I thought these were removed 20 years ago?
Only in some flu vaccines it is still used.
Multi-dose vials of any vaccine that may not be stored properly. It reduces both fungal and bacterial growth when multiple punctures of the latex seal occur.
awesome takedown
It's important to note, people who use "science" and "I am doctor" or maybe "I agree with the science", should be treated with scepticism. Just from the description you can tell this guy is a "follow the government guidelines" kind of person. He either has to believe what he's saying, which means he's about as knowledgeable as you, but he read a book, or he's a grifter. I suspect a person who trust authority figures and will "listen and believes".
If he's so confident, then he should debunk Stefan Lanka's work on virology methodologies. This guys either not very wise or a shill.
Answer this on a video please, who funds the FDA? Where most of their money to do their job comes from? Thanks
mostly from tax payers
@@NonFlyiingDutchman Same as the funding given to Ben Hu, Ping Yu and Yan Zhu to create a deadly flu (coronavirus) at the Wu funded by NIAID.
Government does not produe an income of its own, all government and government agencies are paid through taxes: what exactly is the point you are trying to make.
Tax payer pay for the same regulatory bodies to manufacture the disease with tax dollars then then produce the treatment for that disease using tax dollars.
You really should be taking that issue up with that government and industry you trust so much.
@@MessiahNonEst The OP asked where does most FDA funding coming from, I said it's mostly tax payers......I have no idea how your rant relates to that
@@MessiahNonEst Ooh you are a clever clogs, NFT says it is our taxes (true) you ultimately agree with him but have to do a little patronising explanation of how government is funded. Did you just find that out?
@@NonFlyiingDutchman "I have no idea"
No need to tell me, I've had plenty of first hand of your "I have no idea"
Research: no idea
Use the Internet to research: no idea
Acronym refering to medical conditions: no idea
That Ben Hu began the flu from a lab in Wu: no idea
That 50% is negative not a positive in regards to safety: no idea.
I've got a bullet proof jacket that only stops 50% - ever second shot - half the bullets penertrate, for sale.
Only worn onne, a few holes approx 9mm in diameter, two holes #45, the owner no longer needs is as they died from a bullet wound.
You interested?
Thanks.
🍆🍌👅👅👅
Yo Goofmaster1221 here's a question for you. Those studies that show the miracle horse paste works using in vitro cultures and animal models? How did they show the horse dewormer treating covid if the covid virus doesn't exist according to you?
1861 Louis Pasture: I've got a theory about germs..... germ theory.
1919 Dr Rosenau: Who knows how Spanish flu is transmitted, try as I might not a single volunteer took ill.
2021 Science: It is notable that transmission of large droplets has to date never been proven directly for any respiratory virus infection.
2021 Science: There is no direct evidence for the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 via any specific pathway.
2022 Science: I got a theory of how respiratory viruses may be transmitted.
@@MessiahNonEst
1861: Pastuer proved germ theory
1920s: learn what a bacteria is, bonehead. Rosenau used them in his experiment, specially Pfeiffer's bacillus.
2021: name the study.
2022: 70s kid originally said virus transmission in its entirety was never once proven. This includes blood, aerosol, food, sexual, Zoonosis, formites, water, etc. Now he's changed his original claim to respiratory viral transmission specifically hasn't been proven. Still wrong but now he's been caught moving the goal posts. Oops.
Exhibit A the original claim:
The fact that
the theory of viral
transmission part of
germ theory has,
according to my
research, never been
proven.
Exhibit B the new claim he made after realizing his stupidity.
The
fact that the
transmission of
respiratory viures has
never been proven is
not denial of germ
theory.
@@sithwolf8017 Oh look you're now quoting Dr Rosenau's whom you'd never heard of till I mentioned him in my original comment that you a John Campbelling with your omission.
My original comment where @Muritaipet was bleeting on about the Common Cold Unit, specifically viruses.
Germ theory has never been proven. Dr. Rosenau conducted experiments during the height of the Spanish Flu epidemic. He wanted to establish the means by which influenza was spread. He took 100 healthy volunteers who agreed to be exposed to the Spanish Flu. They were exposed to influenza under controlled conditions, conducting a multitude of different experiments, but none of them contracted the flu.
Most people and Doctors are ignorant of Dr Rosenau's experiments.
Of course your knowledge of Dr Rosenau is the link I posted the other day: more a summary than a detailed description of the experiments.
thatis,wecollectedthematerialandmucoussecretionsofthemouthandnoseandthroatandbronchifromcasesofthediseaseandtransferredthistoourvolunteers.
Thevolunteerwasleduptothebedsideofthepatient;hewasintroduced.Hesatdownalongsidethebedofthepatient.Theyshookhands,and.byinstructions,hegotascloseasheconvenientlycould,andtheytalked·forliveminutes.Attheendofthefiveminutes,thepatientbreathedoutashardashecould,whilethevolunteer,muzzletomuzzle(inaccord¬ancewithhisinstructions,about2inchesbetweenthetwo),receivedthisexpired-breath,andatthesametimewasbreathinginasthepatientbreathedout.Thistheyrepeatedfivetimes,andtheydiditfairlyfaithfullyinalmostalloftheinstances.Aftertheyhaddonethisforfivetimes,thepatientcougheddirectlyintothefaceofthevolunteer,facetoface,fivediffér¬enttimes.Imaysaythatthevolunteerswereperfectlysplendidaboutcarryingoutthetechnicoftheseexperiments.Theydiditwithahighidealism.Theywereinspiredwiththethoughtthattheymighthelpothers.Theywentthroughtheprograminasplendidspirit.Afterourvolunteerhadhadthissortofcontactwiththepatient,talkingandchattingandshakinghandswithhimforfiveminutes,andreceivinghisbreathfivetimes,andthenhiscoughfivetimesdirectlyinhisface,hemovedtothenextpatientwhomwehadselected,andrepeatedthis,andsoon,untilthisvolunteerhadhadthatsortofcontactwithtendifferentcasesofinfluenza,indiffer¬entstagesofthedisease,mostlyfreshcases,noneofthemmorethanthreedaysold.
When you parse the James Joyce out of that lot tell me about Pfeiffer’s bacillus.
Your quoting Dr Rosenau like you know his research inside out when in fact you made yourself look like a fool.
The greatest barrier to discovery is not ignorance but the belief in knowing.
How that 'knowing' serving you?
@@MessiahNonEstf course I know of Dr. Rosenau. I actually learned of him long before I ever even saw my first video of Dr. Wilson. So as usual you're lying. And you're also ignoring the obvious fact he used a bacteria in his experiment. Are you tht stupid that you can't even tell the difference between a virus and a bacterium? Besides the use of a bacteria there are plenty of other flaws with his bullshit experiment. Number 1 was sample size. A sample size of that amount means absolutely nothing in regards to getting results. This is statistics 101. Number 2 is the sick patients were well past the initial highly contagious phase and were either dying or recovering. Number 3 the samples were improperly stored. If memory serves right Rosenau himself makes a mention of that being a limitation. Frankly this experiment was a shit one since day 0. The fact that you think one experiment somehow disproves the existence of the flu or virus transmission is laughably pathetic.
@@sithwolf8017 Name the study that you have ever produced when I requested. That's right zero, nish, nada, zip, sweet fa.
I found it in the science section of Library Internet, one of those trusted sources. And don't bother copying and pasting my comments: I wasn't giong to make that easy for you you dolt.
Now you've called me a liar over this germ theory. Let's see you do some science science BOY.
Dr Rosenau's your best buddy now but when I quote him I'm a what? Oh look well you just went and declared yourself a VIRUS DENIER you 🤡.
So where's that evidence af respiratory viral transmission since Dr Rosenau failed 100yrs ago.
I don't get why RFKjr. is constantly saying,
- he is not anti-vaccine
- he is so open and looking to search out the best and latest science
- "show me where I'm wrong"
What does he say to these very obvious criticisms of his words?
he's been shown where he's wrong so many times but just carries on as if nothing happened and continues spouting lies. Case in point: he claims (as you can see in this video) that vaccines don't undergo place-controlled clinical studies but you can look at the covid vaccine clinical trials that are published online and see that they are place-controlled using saline. He relies on his followers being too stupid to even check I guess.
RFK enjoys lying
@@Sceince007
Yeah he does!
Still voting for Kennedy, he may be wrong on some issues but he is by far the best candidate we have running.
@@Lycan_24_7 yeah I think you like the fact he lies so much . He targets people with intelligence and inability to think clearly . I agree though the other two candidates this time are no different .
Dr Wilson, there were also 2 more cardiac deaths in the placebo group - myocardial infarction. So the count was 4 v 3
Yes, conveniently ignored by the malicious anti-vaxxers.
Myocardial infarction isn't a death, it's death of some of the heart muscle. But nevertheless, 3 extra deaths is completely insignificant.
@@kevinklassen4328 the two deaths were due to myocardial infarction.
@@kevinklassen4328 it was on the list of deaths though
@kevinklassen4328 extra deaths insignificant. Big claim for a small study there broseph
Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.
"In an e-mail dated 17 December 1999, Verstraeten wrote to Robert Davis and copied Frank DeStefano with the subject line, ‘It just won’t go away’; in the body of the e-mail he wrote that ‘all the harm is done in the first month'"
"Just over two months later, Verstraeten had produced a new draft of the analysis - a thirty page report titled ‘Thimerosal VSD Study, Phase 1. Verstraeten made a number of questionable judgement calls, such as excluding all children who did not receive 2 polio vaccines (which reduced the number of zero exposure patients), combining the zero exposure group with the
"Even then, the relative risk of autism for the highest exposure group (>62.5 µg) was 2.48. On 19 March 2000, Verstraeten e-mailed DeStefano to explain that he had run a separate analysis on 10 premature infants from Northern California Kaiser and found that the highest exposure group had a relative risk of developing autism of 5.0 finding of an OR of 5.4 for premature"
@@MessiahNonEst there is absolutely 0 evidence for autism and vaccines, it was extremely scrutinized and tested because of the extreme panic, literally half if not all researchers went out of there way to see if this was true, and they found absolutely nothing to prove it. there is no exposure risk to a nueruolgical condition that isnt even related to how any vaccines functions in the body. not only that but it pushes a condition to be viewed in a negative light
7,000 comments, all short and raves, i.e., bots.
Dude he is small channel I don’t think he can afford to buy bots 🤖. You need a lot of money for that
Has anyone ever called him out real time on his claims of vaccine trials not being conducted? I’ve looked but couldn’t find it. The closest I could come is his definition of Placebo is different than the conventional definition.
There is constant miscommunication, as RFK jr. implies double blind placebo testing prior licensing on especially long term adversary health effects. And of course he is right on that with the Covid vaccin, because long term testing was not possible in order to come with a quick repsonse. In some interviews he was asked if it were his intention to prohibit the vaccine to the people, and he said that 'of course' he is not, he only doesn't want a mandate on vaccins that have not undergone the long term safety protocols that are standard for any other kind of medicine. He stated he is a liberal and everybody should make their own choice to take such a vaccin or not.
Therefore I among others think it's very important to have an in depth debate between him and a scientist who is very knowledgeable on the subject, to get to the detail of it. The censoring attempts only make this debate worse, or even suspicious...
The vaxxine trials did not even take in to account whether the vax prevented corona or not.
They had to rush at the speed of science
Bill Burr pretty much told him hes not a doctor or scientist and neither of them could be qualified to put out this information at mass
It’s interesting because he’s open to debating anyone anytime and debates have been planned but people back out. In the Joe Rogan podcast RFK mentioned there was going to be several scientists debating him at the same time and they still backed out. Strange indeed
Joe’s show is really tedious
June 2023:
Huge leap in breast cancer survival rate
Women diagnosed since 2010 have a much lower risk of dying than those diagnosed in the 1990s.
The number of people who die after a breast cancer diagnosis has decreased by two-thirds since the 1990s, a study of more than half a million women in England has shown.
The research has taken ten years to complete, says Carolyn Taylor, lead author of the study and an oncologist at the University of Oxford, UK. The analysis includes the 512,447 women in England who were diagnosed with early invasive breast cancer between January 1993 and December 2015; the researchers tracked the women until December 2020 using data from the National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service.
@neverforget1971 Somehow all that wifi exposure and bad vaccines did not lead to more cancer deaths for woman
Informed consent & Medical Freedom is why I listen to everything available to make up my own mind based mostly on my own 1st hand observations & life experiences.
People who suppprt CENSORSHIP & FEAR MONGERING because you SELF-RIGHTEOUSLY think & feel YOU KNOW BETTER and IMPOSE your beliefs upon others is the actual EVIL & CRIME against humanity. Based on my observations these felonies are committed by people who are fooled by their egos into thinking that having lots of alphanumerics from a prestigious institution next to their name seem to have super intellectual powers above other fellow human beings.
You would be more constructive if you could “debunk” the most notoriously vax injured by interviewing them or challenging the other “experts” to a debate.
It is easy & lazy to sound convincing when you talk into a camera and curate the content to support your position.
Both sides are EASY to DEBUNK otherwise. Since both sides can cherry picks data.
The reason why JR is the most listened to in the world is the same reason why you probably can’t comprehend why that level of success eludes you.
How is that for some TRUTH for all aspiring CZcamsrs!!!
WiFi radiation is essentially light that's not in the visible spectrum.
Im still not totally convinced that it's healthy
@@malcolmjelani3588 what, light?
If you're still concerned, realize that not only is it just another wavelength of light (but not harmful like uv), it's also extremely dim.
It's like a 20 watt bulb.
Also, it's the same as radio waves, and those have been bouncing around and going right through your body continuously for your whole life, that's how radios and TV, and even cell phones, work.
Remember, cell phones are really just walkie talkies that connect to very sophisticated towers, just hand held radios, there's nothing special going on.
These things have all been extensively tested and they have never given anyone cancer or anything else.
UV radiation is essentially light that's not in the visible spectrum.
I cant validate everything but Dr. Wilson did misrepresent Rogans statement on vitamin D being a cure for Covid. Cuz Rogan never said "if u replace the Vitamin D in a sick person they will get better." As Wilson claims he did. @29:46 Rogan was talking about it as a preventative only, and never with certainty, just him talking about his logic of them being linked.
He also misrepresented rogan claiming that ivermectin helped him... He said he took it and other things and he got better quickly, he never claimed that ivermection was the reason. If you are "debunking" someone you have to stick only to the facts or you debunk yourself. There are other problems with this vid that are basically the same misinformation tactics that big pharma uses, and they are no better than rfk Jr.
Yeah they act like they are so smart saying vitamin d doesn’t cure covid well duh.but if you have low d levels when infected you get way sicker that’s a fact they want to hide so you get vaxed every year
Wilson didn't say that Rogan was saying that though. He said it was a reasonable question to ask, then explained that they got an answer to that question
@@richardelliott84 I think you should listen to the time stamp I posted. He does say Rogan said it would get rid of the sickness to replace the vitamin D. Hence his metaphor about cleaning up the ashes.
Maybe he didn't say it her but he said elsewhere. Joe Rogan is a crook.
This is a real concern. Not sure whether RFK jnr belives this or whether he is trying to garner more voters. This kind of man in tge WhiteHouse would be far more dangerous to your country than Trump. At least no one actualy takes Trump seriously.
Or, just as dangerous as Trump
Allopathic reductionist medicine has never been good at health care at the best of times. Now that Big Pharma and the medical insurance companies run 'medicine', most outcomes are now worse. First 'do no harm' has been completely abandoned, Big Pharma gets indemnification, so now 'medicine' has become the wild wild west. Who could have seen that coming? There needs to be a changing of the guard. Holistic medicine should take over as the primary health care professional and leave the allopath's to do what they are trained to do, trauma and surgeries (only when necessary).
What is your position in excess deaths?
He’s talked in numerous videos about the fact that excess deaths were the result of COVID and were reduced by vaccination
@@topologyrob 🥴🤦🏽♂️🤡
@@lw1zfog Are you having trouble keeping hold of reality there dude/tte?
No surprise the Rogan bro's and RFK Jr followers in the comment section won't refute anything Dr Wilson said.
They won’t even dare respond to you as well . 🙂
I will push back on a couple of things. The media were absolutely disingenuous saying Joe took "horse dewormer" when ivermectin is a common drug given to humans. And Joe wasnt saying Vit D will cure covid, he said Vit D deficiency is a big issue and could lead to a weaker immune system and thus more susceptible to severe covid symptoms.
@@dkoliregardless of how they refer to it, the fact he still took ivermectin goes a LONG way to discredit him as someone worth taking seriously on basically anything other than getting TBIs from sport fighting - something he clearly seems to have experience with.
@@dkoli There is nothing disingenuous about pointing out the fact that Rogan has well documented history of promoting quackery/pseudo-science.
@@iamjustkiwi I never said he was did I.
Does money influence scientific conclusions?
The conclusions are written on the outside of the envelope, the cash inside. The two are separated by a thin wall of paper: the two are not connected.
In the vast majority of cases, no. Like in all walks of life, there will be unethical people in science also, so I am sure people can point to some examples. But those are the exceptions.
A much bigger problem, but still relatively limited, are implicit biases in people. You'll find that a lot in anti-vax scientists, who create whole narratives and cherry pick 'evidence' to prove their point.
Absolutely 💯
Is this ironic? It sounds like it.
No. Data influence the conclusion. Money helps pay the scientists who have labored through the scientific studies.
I did have a seizure when I was given the first DTaP vaccine as an infant, but none of the other vaccines I've had have caused any issues.
deffo just a temporal coincidence, & absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with the saFE & eFfEcTivE fULLy tEsTeD vAxXiNE, at all, ever, ever, ever. ‘correlation vs causation’ is the big pHARMers favourite catch all comeback.
$CIENCE!’ .... believe !!!
Dr, Wilson, what is your view of Vinay Prasad?
Re: the Pfizer trial, they had ~21K ppl /arm. 1 of 21,000 vs 4 of 21,000 is not a significant difference
Excellent point. Rhetoric unchecked and a lack of critical thinking and due diligence is frighteningly dangerous in this modern society we find ourselves in.
@@benreiter7218 I have to wonder if RFK is some kind of psychopath. He knows the Maggiore story...
@@benreiter7218question why do who claim to be critical thinkers can never think at all .
Question to you numb dumbs , how many got infected in treatment arm vs placebo arm ?
*_"Vineland, NJ - 33 year old Nadia Chubok returned from a routine night shift as a medical professional lay down to sleep and did not wake up. She died suddenly on July 7, 2023, leaving behind 2 orphaned kids age 4 and 11"_*
Ethylmercury: C2H5Hg+
Methylmercury: CH3Hg+
RFK Jr. needs to eat his own words and ‘stop this comic book description’ applied to his views on vaccines. He advocates understanding ‘the other side’ yet does none of it himself when it comes to anything scientific. He demonstrates his total lack of basic understanding of chemistry, let alone biochemistry and far beyond him to understand virology, immunology, vaccinology. And there remains no common language that each can understand each other,s ‘beef’
At 20:15, RFK mentions"full blown autism" and you claim that this is "disgusting" because he's calling it "a fate worse than death."
You claim that autism "is just a brain type", but in fact, autism is classified as a disorder (i.e. ASD stands for Autism Spectrum Disorder).
This is a bit of a bad faith interpretation of the thread from Wilson here imo. The full context of what he’s trying to convey (I think), is that using language like “full blown autism” is a scare tactic/appeal to fear, and implicit in that language is the idea that autistic people can’t like meaningful lives. I don’t think Dr. Wilson is not aware that ASD is considered a disorder (I don’t think that you actually think that he thinks this either)
@@ziachoudhury4769 You are completely right that I don't think Dr. Wilson is unaware that autism is considered a disorder. However, his statement that "autism is just a brain type" seems to imply that he believes that autism is neither good, nor bad. Would you agree?
Either way, I fail to see the justification for Wilson calling RFK "disgusting" simply for using the term "full blown autism." The latest terminology in the DSM would call such autism "Level 3 autism," but most laypeople don't know this language or use it. Autism is generally categorized on a spectrum, and terms like "severe autism" and "full blown autism" are common, even in the scientific literature. For instance, in the paper "How autism became autism" (Evans 2013), which looks at the history of the word autism, the author uses the term "full-blown" in categorizing autism, but in no way is it done from a basis of being pejorative or fear-inducing.
There is a movement amongst the science community to consider autism, amongst other types, as a neuro-type (hence the name neurodivergent) and not a disorder to treat. It’s basically polite/ woke lingo/ mindset.
Full-blown dishonesty is RFK jr
I agree. RFK jr is fear mongering using autism as a fate worse than death, beyond all hope, and a mark of Satan
Thanks
Conflict of interest.
It’s so hard for me to understand how our society worked so hard and made so much progress in the field of medicine that saved millions of lives and now we are witnessing an exact reversal of those hard-earned achievements which is increasingly putting our society at a grave risk.
@@philo3479 Hey Philo3479. You wrote the Hep B approval trial "had 147 subjects safety tested for 5 days with no placebo control."
Because when I looked Energix-B, had 6100 people in 58 clinical studies in 19 countries between 1984 - 1986, and was approved in 1989. It's still used. So I get the idea you made that up. *Can you explain what you wrote, perhaps name the study?*
@@philo3479 Dude. WTF are you talking about? *It was either a 3 or a 4 dose trial.* You appear to be randomly making stuff up.
"Summary of clinical findings on Engerix-B, a genetically engineered yeast derived hepatitis B vaccine.
Between February 1984 and August 1986 results have been obtained in 58 completed or ongoing clinical studies by 33 investigators in 19 countries on a yeast-derived recombinant DNA hepatitis B vaccine (Engerix-B). Among the 6100 subjects enrolled in these studies, 5664 subjects (150 normal neonates, 178 neonates of hepatitis B carrier mothers, 330 children aged 3-10 years, 3697 young healthy adults, 438 homosexual males, 110 older healthy adults, 139 drug addicts, 262 institutionalized mentally retarded patients, 59 thalassaemics, 25 sicklaemics, 270 patients on chronic haemodialysis and 6 haemophiliacs) received one or more (up to 4) injections of different doses of the yeast-derived vaccine according to either a 0, 1, 2, and 12 month or a 0, 1, and 6 month vaccination schedule."
*Edit: And it seems to me you are misreporting the RECOMBIVAX HB trials. Even the package insert says.....*
"In three clinical studies, 434 doses of RECOMBIVAX HB, 5 mcg, were administered to *147 healthy infants and children* (up to 10 years of age) who were monitored for *5 days after each dose."*
and
"In a group of studies, 3258 doses of RECOMBIVAX HB, 10 mcg, *were administered to 1252 healthy adults* who were *monitored for 5 days after each dose."*
There is this also this article from 1985
"MERCK's RECOMBIVAX HB DNA-DERIVED HEPATITIS VACCINE APPROVED JUNE 23 AFTER FIVE-MONTH REVIEW; MERCK WILL BEGIN MARKETING IN JANUARY"
*That indicates it was trialed on 3000+ people before it was approved*
@@philo3479 Except of course you're *ignoring 50 years of safety studies.* Good grief, have a look on Scholar. I used "engerix b safety" and got 5,400 hits. *The first 7 pages were safety studies.* The most recent was May 2023. *
You've claimed to be "in the field". How is it you don't know basics? Autism was added to DSM3 in 1980, and DSM4 massively expanded the definition in 1998. Surely you are aware of that, and other diagnostic expansion?
* "Long-term immunogenicity and safety of the hepatitis B vaccine HepB-CpG (HEPLISAV-B) compared with HepB-Eng (Engerix-B) in adults with chronic kidney disease"
@@Muritaipet Vaccines are dangerous, you are wrong
Yes I would love to transport some of these knuckle heads to, say, 900 CE and watch them seek relief from certain dreadful ailments like polio or one of the various plagues or rabies w/o the drugs and surgical protocols we have today. They could see first hand why life expectancy was so short. They could, as well, see that one of the reasons for life expectancy being so high in developed countries is easy access to pharmacological interventions. I think they would be ready to claw their way back to the 20th-21st century just for the over the counter remedies.
@Dr. Wilson, which covid vaccine is the most safe and effective? (assuming they didn't all hit it the same distance out of the park) Also, how can they have tested their potential long-term side effects within a year?
The Cuban Abdala protein subunit vaccine, which had a tested efficacy of 94.8% on one dose, 98.7% on two doses, and no reported side effects.
@@Muritaipet why isn't that what everyone uses then?
@@manhogbear1086 Politics would be a big part of it. For example, the USA would only use one made in America. Something made in Cuba would be right out of the question. This is not just at the governmental level BTW, look at the reply by philo3479. The American populace would howl with protest, over any Cuban product.
There would be practical considerations as well. They had to be ready to go, as soon as they were approved. With success in stage 2 trials, manufacturers probably took the risk and started production. It takes time to make billions of doses, and national govts would underwrite their own companies. It would be near impossible to get them out in a timely fashion, if they waited for every last Vx to finish trials. And there's no guarantee the Cubans would even license production.
Most national govts preferred their own products, where they could. Germany used BionTech, the UK mainly used the Oxford Uni one etc etc. Partly as it keeps govt spending within their own economy. Sometimes its genuine concern over standards in other countries. Sometimes it's just institutional racism, at a government and societal level.
The Chinese ones were the most used, because China practically gave them away. They were using it as a strategic move, to gain international influence. Which probably backfired, as theirs had an efficacy of about 50%.
Lex Friedman send people to You, before letting Kennedy talk.
This is fantastic and invaluable, Dr. Wilson. You are a CZcams hero. Congrats on getting to 26k subs! You deserve 100X that!
haha and rogan has how many??
@@christophercook9745 people seem to prefer cock and bull to science.
@@christophercook9745Ha ha, who cares, rogan's peddling sweet lies. That will always be popular.
@@jamesoneill2606 interesting point. i wonder how millions are so easily fooled when only 26k are not ?
@chriscook1962 look how many were fooled into getting the covid jabs
Thank you!
I’m asking for clarification. I see studies claiming that ethyl mercury does cross the BBB. In your video you say this isn’t the case (04:01) Can you help me understand this contradiction. I’m claiming ignorance here, this isn’t a “gotcha”. I want to understand.
czcams.com/video/tGoJeLyMG5I/video.html
@@philo3479 Dan needs to get real lol, he's just egotistical and completely wrong
Can you link that study?
There needs to be less debunking and more discussions. These videos are also very good, but I am not sure they help in the way that you are trying. Great work though!
Please. Ask Joe if you could come to his show! You could help more there.
Rogan is insufferable
The more growth hormone he takes the dumber he gets.
how do you know?
@@christophercook9745 ?
@@sayresrudy2644 how do you know he is unsufferable?
@@christophercook9745 this question is too stupid to reply to. apologies.
47:55, JRE wasn't dangling money payable to Dr. HOTEZ, but to a charity of his choice. I think a charity unless fraudulent, is bound to do more good than harm, and debating an "anti-vaxxer" especially when that person is running for presidential elections is indeed the more responsible thing to do. So, to decline such an offer doesn't seem like the best course of action.
Yeah but it's not OKAY to debate anti vaxxers becuz reasons.
“Vaccinating is much safer than not vaccinating” needs to be in context of which variant and patient vulnerabilities. Healthy young adults with Omicron who already have some immunity from prior infections and/or vaccinations...is the risk benefit the same there?
you vaccinate for people who cant get them, there are people in the world with auto immune conditions, hospitalized, the elderly on their way out. the fact you people cannot look past yourself and get something that will actually benefit you immensely. You can have a single shot of mrna that is localised and allows your immune system to deal with it correctly, or take your chances with a virus that has unknown amounts of spike protien replicating through your entire body.
This video is aging like milk left out in the sun.
How so?
There is only one periodic table
He says periodic tables 😂
That's both true and false. I can confirm I have seen multiple periodic tables.
Old ones, that didn't have all the current elements.
And multiple hard copies, which can only be described as periodic tables
Just winding you up. I actually thought your comment was observant and funny
@@Muritaipet @Muritaipet "How shall I mock the:
Common Cold Unit..... Errrrr....no.
Human Challenge Trials...... May or may not happen yet. But hey the future predicts the present right Einstein: E=Mc2?
Dr Flunky💉Junkie got schooled and you're still following the fool you tool.
On the transmission of respiratory viruses.
When asked: Therefore they can infect the people standing around them?
Dan the flunk💉junkie replied: "That doesn't checkout really"
@Muritaipet "dr flunky: how shall i mock thee: I dont engage with virus deniers"
Oh and by the way: now you're canceling your subscription, you not wanting to be associated with a virus denying charlatan..... See yeh🤡🤣🤣🤣🤣
An example of hoe one can misspeak on s podcast and his was prepared.
@@MessiahNonEst How shall I mock thee, let me count the ways ................
OMG, I just clicked! You guys both have the cultist / great leader mentality!!! So you have some video that "destroys Wilson" I'm guessing? And this will... do something?
*And you think I care about Wilson. Oh that's absolutely priceless!!!*
@messiahnonest 1 day ago
Definitely the latter. The guy got schooled on being a fool,he knows so much that is not true.
czcams.com/video/dDe4zMqtE2E/video.html
@Goodmorning1221- 20 hours ago
@messiahnonest That link is gold. We have to keep posting it. No need to argue anymore with the trolls
@@DrSurirose a fundamental error that can make some of his listeners lose trust! He seems like a genuine guy. I wonder if he knows that all his scientific arguments are fake news. He probably does. At the end of the day, he is a politician.
Sorry in avance for my bad english. I have a question regarding a study that Robert cited, the one where they found the mercury inside the monkies brain. I was hoping you would debunk that one, but you didn't mention it (or maybe I missed it?). Do you have any information about this? Thank you for your work.
He ignored it because he can't debunk it. This video was pathetic
He also repeated the lie that Ethyl Mercury is excreted from the body faster.
@@matthewsands3591It absolutely is. One can merely look at the half life of both, because ethyl decays faster. It takes 10 days for half a given amount of ethyl mercury to decay, wheras it takes 50 days for the same amount of methylmercury to decay. That's 5x as fast. And that's assuming it all accumulates.
@@Skidzo19 that's not true. It's already been established that Ethyl Mercury leaves the blood faster because it goes into the brain, not because it is excreted from the body.
@@matthewsands3591 I actually found this video very interesting and helpful. To be honest I rather be informed by a true scientist than a guy who says that the free market will solve the climate crisis.
All I can say is I'm soooooo glad that I didn't get vaccinated 🍿. Continue.....
Why do you boast about being a complete whacko with no regard for others?
At least AI will soon take over and commoditize IQ... so intelligent AND conscious people can be the leaders of science while we let the machines take over the role of all the overly vaccinated autistic Self-less savants who aren't capable of knowing them Selves or leading others to any place worth going.
Love the T-shirt!!!😍
*"Ivermectin was tested in a randomised study in Columbia at a dose of 300 μg per kilogram per day for 5 days, but there was no discernible benefit. In a second, related trial carried out at five separate US locations, even doses of 390 to 470 g per kilogram per day for 3 days did not have any discernible effects."*
Just here to mock GM1221 .................
This is one of the comments I've been looking for, that guy is genuinely, worryingly unhinged.
@@iamjustkiwi Yes, GM1221 even refuses to acknowledge viruses exist. In my view there is little point arguing with people like that.
Also:
*In this meta-analysis of 12 randomized clinical trials involving 3901 patients, favorable mortality results were limited to trials in high-prevalence regions, with no evidence that ivermectin had a mortality benefit in low-prevalence regions. Meta-regression found an association between the regional prevalence of strongyloidiasis and risk of mortality, with a decrease in RR of 39% for each 5% increase in strongyloidiasis prevalence.*
Ivermectin only showed positive benefits in regions where strongyloidiasis (intestinal parasites) were endemic, and not controlled for.
At 37:08, weren’t the participants in the placebo group of this trial given the vaccine not that long after the trial ???
Yes thy were are you saying they should not have been?
RFK JR 24 for those who are not completely braindead.
Pro-science combat veteran here. Kennedy 2024!!
Great Work. 🔥👍
Rogan doesn't give a flying fig about accuracy and truth. He is just in it for the clicks.
He makes around $20,000 per day and one might suggest that he contributes to the same number of individuals that suffer from poor decisions made by individuals who are mislead and have their ‘murcah cause free-dumb’ spirit monetised through clicks.
@@poerava And, when he is called out by people who know better, he always falls back on the, "Chill, bruh. I'm just a dumb meathead asking questions", excuse. No, he is actively promoting things that are controversial even when they are patently idiotic. I don't think he's as stupid as he likes to pretend to be. He may have zero actual knowledge about science but he sure knows what sells.
@@poerava hes worth over $100 million he dont care about clicks he couldnt spend the interest on that daily even if he tried to
@@christophercook9745
Mo money mo problems.
@@christophercook9745 he got to the level of wealth he has BECAUSE HE CARES ABOUT CLICKS. The money didnt just fucking appear in his account for no reason......
I don't believe I've witnessed a more serious trouncing of misinformation.
"It is very hard for a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it" Upton Sinclair the Jungle
Is he coming on you show? You have a open invitation to anyone you do a video on don't you? That would be interesting to see
exactly, you don't see RFK trying to debunk thus guy, he'd be happy to debate him face to face, this guy is a condescending fraud, he pleads to people's need to be right.
And this man wants to become President, man oh man
That’s funny. Who’d you vote for in 2020?
I burst out laughing when he started talking about how Wifi causes cancer. This is textbook pseudoscience that should raise red flags.
Maybe he meant that his WIFE causes cancer. ;)
WiFi can cause cancer if it’s powerful enough more likely to just give you an internal sunburn like if you walk in front of one of those big white cones on radio towers
You might be thinking about microwaves
people have gotten tumors from cellphones you tool lol! it's proven.
You should try to grow 2 of the same plants 1 next to your wifi router and 1 on the other side of your house. And see the results.
People who tend to not do adequate research and have no idea what they're talking about, loooove to use the word pseudoscience. They think it makes them look smarter, when in actually they appear very uninformed.
I’m still sooooo happy I didn’t take any Covid jabs!
Well we all need one thing in life we can be happy about.
🤷♀️
Thank you for continuing to debunk the deluge of misinformation that continues to be so pervasive across social media.👏👏👏👏👏
Wish someone like him would go on the podcast and shed light.
Perhaps Dr. Wilson would debate Rfk Jr? Hotez is a joke anyway.
@@sebastianmedina5775 why would any credible expert go on rogan's podcast? Do you think anyone who tunes into rogan for 'unbiased debate' is going to be swayed by ANYTHING said by an actual expert?
@superanimeniac the fact that they won't debate or defend their ideas makes them less credible. Make all the excuses you want but the pro vax side look bad by refusing to debate
@@superanimeniacyes, as a JR fan, I would say: absolutely
thanks for exposing this clown once again
yeah he doing a great job for his 26k subscribers
@@christophercook9745 And the bulk of whom probably already agree almost totally with him. I think there is a phrase for that? Preaching... or something like that.
@@Benson_Bear confirmation bias