How to Save a Constitutional Democracy: Justice D.Y. Chandrachud & Tom Ginsburg
Vložit
- čas přidán 27. 07. 2024
- "How to Save a Constitutional Democracy" Book Launch featuring the Honorable Dr. Justice D. Y. Chandrachud, Judge, Supreme Court of India and Professor Tom Ginsburg, Leo Spitz Professor of International Law, Ludwig and Hilde Wolf Research Scholar, Professor of Political Science, University of Chicago.
Other panelists include:
Arvind P. Datar, Founder Trustee, Nani Palkhivala Foundation & Senior Advocate, Supreme Court of India
Payal Chawla, Founder, JusContractus & University of Chicago Law School Alumna
Details: www.uchicago.in/events/book-l...
➡ Subscribe: bit.ly/UCHICAGOytSubscribe
About #UChicago:
Since its founding in 1890, the University of Chicago has been a destination for rigorous inquiry and field-defining research. This transformative academic experience empowers students and scholars to challenge conventional thinking in pursuit of original ideas.
#UChicago on the Web:
Home: bit.ly/UCHICAGO-homepage
News: bit.ly/UCHICAGO-news
Facebook: bit.ly/UCHICAGO-FB
Twitter: bit.ly/UCHICAGO-TW
Instagram: bit.ly/UCHICAGO-IG
University of Chicago on CZcams:
/ uchicago
***
ACCESSIBILITY: If you experience any technical difficulties with this video or would like to make an accessibility-related request, please email digicomm@uchicago.edu.
He is one of the best judges this country has seen. An epitome of knowledge and a great human being.
You're absolutely right Hon'ble Justice Faiz Khan Sir
Khan babu tumko sabh acha lagta hai pakistan bhi tum ko bularaha hai
DY Chandrachud ,the epitome of modern judiciary 🛐 , i wish i could be like him!
10:28"...Orban in Turkey, Chavez in Venezuela-" I think he resisted saying Modi in India to avoid making Justice Chandrachud uncomfortable. The look on Justice Chandrachud's face makes me believe even he is thinking about it.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣sahi kaha agr modi ka naam leta to bahut maza aata Yaha jaam ke le le log woke DY Chadarachud ki 🤣
D. Y. Chandrchud is one of the best judges in Indian judiciary🤯and also he is so, humble person 🖤 politicians have to learn from him. 🙏🙏🙏
appointment of lawyers who are experts in a particular field like commercial, criminal, etc for two or three years is the step we must proceed with.- good point by Mr. Chandrachud.
सरन्यायाधीश धनंजय चंद्रचूड साहेब जी मे सजगता और गतिमानता के गुण है इसपर वह हर समस्याओंपर जीत हासिल करने के लिए सक्षम है ! धन्यवाद
HH justice DY chandrachud is most prominent judge we ever seen.
Very nice really need such discussions
15:45 like in the case of prashant bhushan case, j&k statehood abolition case, CAA,
Justice Chandrachud is my Whatsapp Profile Picture 😊
By being humble about oneself.
Very good information
Great person and great human being
Anyone here to watch the video after arnab goswami case.
Happy birthday,Justice Chabdrachud☺️
Meghna yes. at that time also i felt H justice has larger perspective in mind and trying to show the path to others about the personal liberty. i do not approve the journalism of goswami. his bail is insignificant before what H jusitce has spoken about the personal liberty and his comments during the hearing. He is a judge par excellence.
Seems error in displaying names of justice Dr Chandrachud & justice Arvind Datar are interchanged.
Anyone who doesn't recognize them could take it as displayed
You are right .. even nobody expected such silly mistake at such high level of forum discussion.
Chandrachud sir looks a bit like Rahul Dravid's brother
Humble submission. Human rights education is necessary and it has to be started from the school level onwards.
Do you mean Bhagavad Gita?
Why are they all seated so uncomfortably close
He is one of best Cji
For Constitution to be upheld we need democratic checks and balances.
This requires an effective and powerful Opposition & an Independent mature Judiciary.
Finally Justice delayed is justice denied. Delayed justice is itself a miscarriage of justice. If it involves imprisonment of political prisoners of conscience under non bailable draconian state security laws its a terrible shame.
👍👍👍
Humble submission.special human rights. Courts are to be established.
But I had to say this..Justice delayed is justice denied..When rich people in India can hire big lawyers and can fight their case successfully.Poor people cannot even get a date.They had to wait for 5 to 10 years and the appeal moves on to next court n next court ..Till then poor cannot spend time,money and energy on courts n they wud either die or withdraw it..Classic example is salman khan case where lower court punished him and within evening he got bail in higher court..Is this possible for all..Courts are the god to ppl ..more fast track court shud be there and more judges shud be appointed .
DY.Chandrachur is a great judge
Let us not get unduly impressed by
eminent people present here, their
smart clever arguments, let us look hard at how democracies have functioned, what they have delivered to the society at large, I would much rather prefer a Chinese model of Governance , or better still a Singaporean model , than the chaos we see in the name of democracy.
If an enlightened charismatic leader
can deliver better why should I get swayed by thousands of smart talkers which are in fact vested interests wailing over demise of democracy.
36:08 a best constitution can fail & most imperfect constitution may to work better ...👌👌👌👌 ...
And it's happens because of the mentality of the ruling government.
Talkers are not makers is it true?
first thing he should have said is that appointment of judges should be by the parliament just like it is done in the USA and most of the other democracies !
What is law
He's 62 but looks quite young.
I m Vishva champion mare my Bholenath❤❤❤❤❤
What is justice fundamental rights following the answer to society world today feedbackme please
Justice chaknachur.
What is good quality education management unknown all'courts uprightness data analytics
Well, what if "strengthening" the democracy leads to total state failure? Atleast for academic interests this idea must be analysed.
The reform in judiciary is subject to recognition and control of preamble of constitution after revocation of authorizations temporarily granted in favor of Supreme Court in 1950.
Kunal kamra said hi 😆😆
Chandrachud is a statesman.
DY Chandra chur chief Justice Supreme Court appointed by collegium system epitome of disqualification, incompleteness exposed inability in PIL N0 224 0f 2017 on 10.07.2017 with chief Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar now retired.
पालकीवाला और साल्वे सिबल सब ब्रिटिश कोलोनियल निरंकुश कानून का रक्षक 5 करोड केस निलंबित 17-18 लाख विचाराधीन कैदी अधिकांस आदिवासी समुदाय गरीब St SC जनता अधिकार हनन PIL No.224 of 2017beyond understanding of chief Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar now retired and Justice Dy.Chandra chur now chief Justice.
There is tussle between government of India and Supreme Court but President of India is the Supreme power to revoke authorization granted in favor of Supreme Court if necessary
Constitutional democracy was superceded by British colonialism judiciary Independency incorporated temporarily in article 50 in constitution in 1950 without explicitly defined separation of power and power of judicial accountability essential basic structure of constitution
What is democracy right 💯 unknown all'courts uprightness data analytics
I am gradually loosing my faith towards our Judiciary after Arnab Goswami case!!
Due to his jail or bail?
LOL says the person who dnt know a B of the case 😂😂😂
Agrsv..,.😮
Psychology consider oneself lucky you cji
Chandrachur bohot hosiyar h
When was a "constitutional democracy" ever created? "We have a Republic if we can keep it." - Benjamin Franklin. When did we lose the Republic?
Seriously ..retirement age of 62 is Not a wise thing... I mean those are more young and capable .. justices..
According to Me Retirement..age of Justices should be 68-70... Both of HC and SC
डीवाई साहब बहुत थेंथर है5 crore cases backlog and 17-18 lakh under trial prisoners enfringement of rights and judges disqualified in interpretation of British colonialism judiciary/.collegium system appointing judges becoming agents of British colonialism system what about Govt plan for its abolition which superseded preamble of constitution. .President of India can tackle tussle between government and Supreme Court by restoring power of constitution by revocation of British colonialism judiciary from constitution. जस्टिस डीवाई चन्द्र चुर चीफ जस्टिस जगदीश सिंह खेहर के साथ सुप्रीम कोर्ट मे PIL N0 224 0f 2017 on 10.07.2017 5crore cases backlog और 17-18 lakh under trial prisoners enfringement of rights denial of access to justice beyond interpretation because British colonial judiciary incorporated temporarily in article 50 in constitution superseded preamble of constitution dealt with by Supreme Court frequently judicial Independent overreach unbridled power atrocities exploitation and corruption. Complaints of people not to be acted upon.
Constitutional democracy has been superseded by British colonialism judiciary now collegium system. President of India has power to save constitutional democracy by revoking authorization temporarily granted in favor of Supreme Court to deal with British colonial legislation.
Government should ban media groups including Facebook you tube Google until democratic laws and standard and judicial accountability framed by deliberations of actions and reactions of opinions of delegates of almost all castes and religions by collective wisdom supposed to be so just acceptable to people for package of reform to carry out the wishes of people sources of Supreme authority of preamble of constitution observed by Dr Ambedkar sahib.
Government is made by people representing in parliament liable to people but Supreme Court is Independent judiciary not subject to recognition and control of preamble of the constitution but subject to recognition and control of British colonialism judiciary Independency unbridled power unaccompanied by liability frequently passed orders by judicial Independent overreach keeping balance among legislature executive and judiciary which means invasions on sovereignty of Independent India and government is subject to recognition and control of Supreme Court Dictator not tolerable and acceptable to people of India.
"Now a days democracy dies slowly giving Chinese analogy death by thousand cuts".
This situation looks like he talking about India and world as a whole. BJP as the central government are trying to bring destruction of democratic rights and change the basic fundamentals of the Constitution.
BJP hatao desh bachao🙏
BJP hatao desh bachao
Bc itne logo ko maar diya yeh bjp ne without oxygen
I hope this man remains well
@@saikatmallick8288 than dream my dear...if u and ur woke judges dare to harm BJP and Modi ...i promises you ....we indian sanatanis will bring back modi and BJP with almost 400+ seats🙏🙏🙏
Congress ain't no better. There are many draconian laws enacted by congress
The Guy who asked about Judicial reform did ask about reform ... But he has no knowledge that litigants are granted legal rights To appeal their cases To highest court of appeal in line of hiarchy
Many are saying Chandrachud is a congressi stooge why????.
Have you listened to his son chintan and Abhinav chandrachud view on Article 370 and CAA you will know why he is a congress stooge
Define democratic standards and judicial accountability subject to recognition and control of preamble of the constitution
VS
British colonialism judiciary Independency/collegium system alien rules of laws in Supreme Court beyond interpretation capabilities of chief Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar now retired and Justice Dy.Chandra chur now chief Justice in PIL No.224 of 2017 on 10.07.2017 now 5 crore backlog cases pending enfringement of rights of people and 17-18 under trial prisoners
Constitution doesn't fall within jurisdiction of Supreme Court for reform which is property of people and political parties. Maximum advocates agents of judges appointed by collegium system for engaging to illicit activities by criminal misconduct by illicit agreement to act within implied bounds of British colonialism judiciary 5 crore cases backlog and 17-18 lakh under trial prisoners enfringement of rights exposed on 10.07.2017 in PIL No.224 of 2017 must be revoked by President of India from constitution temporarily incorporated in article 50 undefined separation of power and power of judicial review essential basic structure of constitution in 1950 beyond amending power of parliament subject to recognition and control of British colonialism legislation protected by Supreme Court Anti democracy rebelious debates threats to sovereignty of India.
In PIL N0 224 0f 2017 on 10.07.2017 chief Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar now retired and Justice Dy.Chandra chur now chief Justice incapable of interpretation of British colonialism judiciary temporarily incorporated in constitution anti India beyond recognition and control of judges dealt with by Supreme Court from 1950.
यह जरूरत है कि जज को क्या मिलता है कि जनता अधिकार हनन 5 करोड केस निलंबित अधिकार हनन 17-18 विचाराधीन कैदी PILNO.224 OF 2017beyond interpretation capacity of chief Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar now retired and Justice Dy.Chandra chur now chief Justice incapable by collegium system anti India. Keshvanand Bharti case verdict कुछ वकील पत्रकार धूर्त जज सरकार को गुमराह भ्रमित कर ब्रिटिश कोलोनियल सिस्टम दुष्प्रभाव सरकार लोकतान्त्रिक कानून निर्माण करना वर्जित है ब्रिटिश कोलोनियल सिस्टम बदलाव करना वर्जित है सरकार का सम्विधान सुधार वर्जित है सम्विधान को ब्रिटिश कोलोनियल सिस्टम supersided कमजोर बना दिया 1950 से लोकतान्त्रिक कानून बनाना वर्जित है जब तक ब्रिटिश कोलोनियल सिस्टम को सुप्रीम कोर्ट से राष्ट्रपति केन्सिल नही करते है।
What is god
The Political parties and people sources of Supreme authority of preamble of constitution representing parliament are authority to enact democratic laws subject to recognition and control of preamble of constitution after revocation of authorizations temporarily granted in favor of Supreme Court to deal with British colonial legislation judiciary Independency unbridled power unaccompanied by liability now collegium system
President of India MS Droupadi Murmur should examine the quality of Dy.Chandra chur elevated as chief Justice incapable exposed in PIL N0 224 0f on 10.07.2017 chief Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar now retired and Justice Dy.Chandra chur elevated chief Justice disqualified incapability to define British colonialism beyond their interpretation capacity. Keshvanand Bharti verdict restricted parliament from enacting democratic laws and changing British colonialism essential basic structure of constitution temporarily granted in favor of Supreme Court Anti Indian. Judges rebellious debates refer the judges are Anti Indian by temporarily incorporated British colonialism in constitution. Supreme Court subject to recognition and control of British colonialism alien rules of laws not democratic standards and judicial accountability for which constitution of India drafted and introduced in 1950 to carry out the wishes of people for the factors on which the workings of those organs of state depend are people and political parties they will set up as their instruments to carry out the wishes of people sources of Supreme authority of preamble of constitution. Collegium system derived from British colonialism system temporarily incorporated in constitution granted authorisation for time being to control hooliganism after Independence dealt with by Supreme Court judges but unfortunately superseded preamble of constitution defied sovereignty of government of Independent India. President of India can revoke authorization granted temporarily by Lord Mountbatten viceroy of interim government of Independent India.
Research reports submitted on 19.07.2017 to Government of India.
PILNO.224 of 2017 arose from Dictatorship of Supreme Court 5 crore cases pending and 17 to 18 lakh in prisoners under trial enfringement of rights of people victims of atrocities exploitation and corruption by British colonialism judiciary deserved to be abolished from India administrative machineries including constitution
refused on 10.07.2017 by chief Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar now retired and Justice Dy.Chandra chur now chief Justice giving direction upon competent authority to revoke official authorization granted British colonial judiciary Independency incorporated temporarily without explicitly defined in constitution in 1950 now collegium system Anti India should have been disincorporated revoked by President of India now 75years defying sovereignty of India.
Constitutional democracy subject to recognition and control of preamble of constitution different from British colonialism judiciary subject to recognition and control of British colonialism legislation oppressive laws alien rules of laws undemocratic.
It is illwill bad intentions of
judges, advocates and Patrakars extending power invasion on sovereignty of India ignored to find out mechanism to resolve 5 crore backlog cases pending enfringement of rights of people ..
President of India Supreme authority can revoke authorization granted in favor of Supreme to deal with British colonial legislation judiciary anti India Indian rule of democratic standards and judicial accountability subject to control of preamble of constitution to serve people. Outcome of deliberations of actions and reactions of opinions of delegates of people representing parliament. People need abolition of colonialism judiciary Independency unbridled power unaccompanied by liability anti India disloyality and disaffection dealt with Supreme Court alien rules of laws not acceptable to people and government of India.
Rebelious debates must be banned by revoking authorization granted in favor of Supreme Court to deal with British colonial legislation superseding preamble of constitution.
President of India Supreme authority can revoke temporary official permission granted in 1950 in favor of Supreme Court invite Shaheed Udham Singh.
जजो के फौज लोकतंत्र पर अतिक्रमण भारत सरकार लोकतान्त्रिक सौभरेन गणराज्य जनता और राजनीतिक दल महागठबन्धन कानून निर्माण का अधिकारी जजो का रिबेलियस डिवेट भारत सरकार के sovereignty पर अतिक्रमण बगावत जनता के अधिकार हनन 5 करोड केस निलंबित और 17-18 लाख कैदी विचाराधीन खुलासा PIL N0 224 0f 2017beyond understanding on 10.07.2017 by chief Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar now retired and Justice Dy.Chandra chur now chief Justice incapable of the of British colonialism judiciary Independency superseded preamble of constitution in 1950.
No excuse
These laws are bogus thing for common people. Stop all these nonsense.
Supreme Court subject to recognition and control of British colonialism alien rules of laws not democratic standards and judicial accountability for which constitution of India drafted and introduced in 1950 to carry out the wishes of people for the factors on which the workings of those organs of state depend are people and political parties they will set up as their instruments to carry out the wishes of people sources of Supreme authority of preamble of constitution. Collegium system derived from British colonialism system temporarily incorporated in constitution granted authorisation for time being to control hooliganism after Independence dealt with by Supreme Court judges but unfortunately superseded preamble of constitution defied sovereignty of government of Independent India. President of India can revoke authorization granted temporarily by Lord Mountbatten viceroy of interim government of Independent India.
This let go a Hate monger TV journalist today. The journalist has been openly inciting hatred and targeting minority communities on the behest of his employer, the government of India. He speaks on National TV, which provides anyone with crystal clear proof of his hate mongering and disturbing journalism. His decision today doesn't surprise many, as justice Chandrachudh is on track of becoming the next CJI. He ought to "Obey". Such a shame!
👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼
with due respect to your emotional outbrust which most of us have to such journalism, remember, basic rights must be upholed and shown to be upholded, which H justice has done. That journalist is nothing, let the time chanage, you will hear the timid sound of a dog. But democratic principles must be upholded.
President of India should have disincorporated revoked authorization granted in favor of Supreme Court to control three organs of government. Constitution dead inactive because superseded by British colonialism system temporarily.
British colonialism system mechanism of growth of mafia groups act in collusion with concerned area competent authorities deploying public officers/ bit officers for voluntarily causing extortion for ransom money putting fear of grievous injury for extortion for land for unauthorized building constructions grabbing land dealing in unlawful businesses engaging with Mafia groups àrose from British colonialism incorporated temporarily in article 50 in constitution in 1950.superseded preamble of constitution granted authorisation for time being by Lord Mountbatten the viceroy of interim government of Independent India rejecting overhauling proposal of professor KT Shah member of constitutional drafting committee .
The reform of British colonialism judiciary is cancellation of authorizations temporarily granted in favor of Supreme Court in 1950 .the President of India is Supreme power to revoke authorization granted in favor of Supreme Court and release British colonialism judiciary Independency overreach from India. The alien rules of laws British colonialism judiciary now collegium system imposing oppressive laws enacted by british executive and judiciary to attain their own needs anti India where frequently judicial orders passed by Independent overreach by judges of peasant nature appointed by collegium system on 10.07.2017 by chief Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar gold medalist now retired and Justice Dy.Chandra chur elevated as chief Justice incapable of interpretation of British colonialism judiciary Independency granted in 1950 now 75 years dealing with alien rules of laws British colonialism in favor of Supreme Court by official permission temporarily incorporated in article 50 in constitution subject to reform abolish by President of India because 5 crore backlog cases pending enfringement of rights of people the Supreme Court engaged to illicit activities affecting sovereignty of India by rebelious debates threats to sovereignty of India.
The constitution of India is fuck time.pass.money.lost
Look who's giving opinions on saving constitutional democracy - the very person who is oblivious to equality, afraid despite being one of the juries of the supreme court of world's largest democracy . Dude you are just a waste of human resources..........Wait is this contempt of court............
What is the constitution of India right now active iam help you understand my problem murdered trainingschoolindia purplexyoucji Happy Birthday to parricides regicide matricide parricides human slaughter registration for the same to you CJI
Talkers are not makers is it true?
यह जरूरत है कि जज को क्या मिलता है कि जनता अधिकार हनन 5 करोड केस निलंबित अधिकार हनन 17-18 विचाराधीन कैदी PILNO.224 OF 2017beyond interpretation capacity of chief Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar now retired and Justice Dy.Chandra chur now chief Justice incapable by collegium system anti India. Keshvanand Bharti case verdict कुछ वकील पत्रकार धूर्त जज सरकार को गुमराह भ्रमित कर ब्रिटिश कोलोनियल सिस्टम दुष्प्रभाव सरकार लोकतान्त्रिक कानून निर्माण करना वर्जित है ब्रिटिश कोलोनियल सिस्टम बदलाव करना वर्जित है सरकार का सम्विधान सुधार वर्जित है सम्विधान को ब्रिटिश कोलोनियल सिस्टम supersided कमजोर बना दिया 1950 से लोकतान्त्रिक कानून बनाना वर्जित है जब तक ब्रिटिश कोलोनियल सिस्टम को सुप्रीम कोर्ट से राष्ट्रपति केन्सिल नही करते है।
Judges faced off with Government is invasion on sovereignty of Independent India because Supreme Court is one of organs of government can not comment on sovereignty of Independent India. Government is made by people representing in parliament liable to people but Supreme Court is british Independent judiciary not subject to recognition and control of preamble of the constitution but subject to recognition and control of British colonialism judiciary Independency unbridled power unaccompanied by liability frequently passed orders by judicial Independent overreach keeping balance among legislature executive and judiciary which means invasions on sovereignty of Independent India and government is subject to recognition and control of Supreme Court Dictator not tolerable and acceptable to people of India.
President of India Supreme authority can revoke authorization granted in favor of Supreme to deal with British colonial legislation judiciary anti India Indian rule of democratic standards and judicial accountability subject to control of preamble of constitution to serve people. Outcome of deliberations of actions and reactions of opinions of delegates of people representing parliament. People need abolition of colonialism judiciary Independency unbridled power unaccompanied by liability anti India disloyality and disaffection dealt with Supreme Court alien rules of laws not acceptable to people and government of India.
Talkers are not makers is it true?