The $330 16GB RX 7600 XT... what’s the catch?
Vložit
- čas přidán 15. 06. 2024
- See the full raw benchmark runs here: • RX 7600 XT vs RX 6600 ...
Timestamps:
00:00 - Intro
01:43 - Cards I tested against the 7600 XT
03:24 - Test System
05:35 - Rasterization performance
12:24 - Raytracing performance
13:53 - Thoughts on the 7600 XT
17:59 - Conclusions
Official Nerd on a Budget Merch: www.bonfire.com/store/nerd-on...
Improve your Amazon shopping experience with VETTED today, use this link when installing to help support the channel (100% FREE)! bit.ly/3AguCmO
Check out products I use/recommend here! vetted.ai/creator/nerd-on-a-b...
If you're shopping for anything on Amazon or Newegg you can use these links to support my channel, it costs nothing extra to you and a tiny bit of help from a lot of people goes a long way:
Amazon: amzn.to/2acMPuf
Newegg: bit.ly/3hB8yKj
Follow me on Twitter and Instagram!
/ nerdonabudget
/ nerdonabudget
Channel Music by ManKarate:
/ mankarate
/ mankarate1212
Mailing Address:
NEW (starting Dec. 2022):
Danny Le
12918 Mukilteo Speedway
Suite C-23 PMB235
Lynnwood, WA 98087
OLD (Don't send to this one anymore):
Danny Le
P.O. Box 2385
Lynnwood, WA 98036
Try Amazon Prime Free for 30 days:
amzn.to/2tTmwlz
Try Audible FREE for 30 days:
amzn.to/2tLohAU - Věda a technologie
I'm running the RX 6700 XT with my Ryzen 5 5600x and love it
That's what I'm getting! I have the 5600G and I'm either getting the 6700XT or 6750XT, which model do you have? I've been looking at the Fighter one, also the MSI 6750XT
Im running the same and its soo good
@@iitzfizz I got the Asrock challenger pro 6750xt at micro center for $300. So far it’s been perfect. It does surprisingly good at 1440p
*Slaps the top of the 6700xt*
This bad boy can render so many frames
This could have been a legendary card if it had used the 7700xt/7800xt die....still, if you want current gen, more than 8 gigs of VRAM, and don't have at least $450 to spend..this is about the only options. If you also need VRAM for uses outside of gaming, then this might be one hell of a budget option.
I use an RX 7600 XT , haven't really tested any other cards and in local stores there are little options so i chose this card. I play some titles in 1440p and some on 4k (when the card can run them on a good frame rate) i liked the 16GB of vram and so far i m happy with my choice.
Me still chilling with my rx 6900 xt
The 7700xt matches the 6800 although it has less vram. The 7600xt should have been on par with the 6700xt but they just added 16gb onto the 7600 and called it an xt with a minor clock bump
Which one would you recommend more for a new build? or should i just buy a used 6700 XT for 200$ then buy cards when they make sense?
@@_ynnek get the 6700xt
@@_ynnekIf you could get a 6700xt at a low price get it another option is rtx 4060.
@@Brispydoe it’s much larger. This performance level should be available in a smaller more efficient card from amd. That what a new generation normally brings
You are hands down the best tech youtuber out there keep it up man
The RX 6800 was sort of the hidden gem of the RDNA 2 lineup. Here in Australia I see them occasionally for around the $450 AUD mark ($296 USD). That's great value. I sold my 6900 XT and was waiting for my 7900 XTX to be delivered so I though I'd try one out for a while. I overclocked one and played Sons of the Forest at 4K/Max Settings where I was getting a steady 60 FPS. Incredible performance for the price. I think if you're only looking to play at 1440p High or Ultra settings withg competitive FPS then you should absolutely be considering the RX 6800 non-XT.
The 6800xt is a good card with 16gb.
i'd prob chose the 7600 16gb if it was 300$ just for the vram and longer driver updates
7600 is 8gb.
I bought the Asus Tuff version. If fits my needs, and checks a couple of boxes. It's going to last me for a while.
I can't afford to buy a new GPU every couple years. The last new card I bought was a 5700xt, on release date. Back then I was coming from a 3 gig 1060 and I was thinking wow that 8 gigs of vram holy shit that's a lot that's really going to help me out and it did. So I'm thinking this will do the same. Also for the encoder, and my main reason besides gaming is for my stable diffusion. That 16 gigs of vram really really helps out a lot, it's like the difference between night and day compared to the old 5700xt. Now I have a good card that's still decent that I can give to my kid and she can have it to put in her rig besides rocking the integrated graphics on her 8700k.
Doesnt vram usage cost more when using more screens? I have a 3090 24gb but i use a gaming 55inch tv it has 240hz rr and helps with preventing a cpu bottleneck compared to a msi gsync monitor thats 1080p 175hz which i prefer when my eyes cant handle the big screen but my cpu gets a tough ride trying to keep uo with the 3090 with gsync
Which mid range card would you recommend for streaming and content creation? I was considering this but also open to a few others like the A770 or 4060
How would these cards perform on a PCI Gen 3 system?
Great card, the 16gb is great for running llama 3 on the GPU. Really fast for running LLM's.
Thanx for the video, but why are we not getting a 6750 xt comparison? at only an average $50 difference in cost why would we not choose that card?
The 6700 XT for 369 euro in the NL. Same price as the 7600 XT.
6700 XT and 6800 are the top picks in this price range forsure
can you still find them in stock though? most of the major stockist in the UK no longer have any 6700XT a few 6750XT are still available though.
Seems like a decent pickup for a new card at that price and smaller size could be nice for people doing smaller cases, but I personally prefer the 6700xt in that bracket. Great review, thanks for the fair comparison instead of just pooping on it.
It's the bus! If it have 192 bus? It will be great.
great video
The power consumption between the 6700 xt and rtx 4060 is a lot though
That 6700 XT is looking like the real deal from last gen, I'd recommend it if you can get it from around $300 Won't be surprised if it gets harder to find on the used market at a fair price once they all get scooped up though.
So would you recommend this card for somebody building a pc for the first time with somewhat future proofing in mind?
You all got to stop asking these questions without any context and expecting to get a proper response. No one knows that you're building a PC for web browsing or for AAA titled games. No one knows your budget, which platform, etc.
@@disguiseddv8ant486 The average person getting into PC gaming doesn't know to ask these questions right away, it's up to enthusiasts to help out
Honestly from the most recent lines of cards, it's a safe bet. It'll perform well in most games coming out at 1080p, maybeee 1440p too. It'll last you for some years of gaming for sure
@@disguiseddv8ant486 eat ass idiot
I was actually waiting for the 7600 XT for a build I was making for a friend. The price to performance ratio was kind of meh so I opt'd for a new 3060 12gb for $280 and invested the remaining money on a better cpu instead.
Glad to find you. Since we're in the same state ha
I don't know why people keep thinking twice the vram is supposed to = twice the performance, or any kind of actual major performance bump. It's not there for that. Its extra ram to allow for higher quality textures and any other visual features that eat up vram making them impractical to use on a lower amount of vram, as in 12Gb or less. This wont matter much on most games yet. But it does matter if you want to run any game that eats up vram and needs 16gb to max out textures. Something like Company of Heroes 3, or the newer Resident Evil games for instance.
Still got a 1050ti 4gb, this would be an upgrade no matter what lol. But I'm not paying stupid prices for gpus anymore.
A RX 6600 for $189.95 would be a huge jump up from a GTX 1050 TI!
I recently bought the 7600 XT for my daughters first pc. She will be playing games at 1080p resolution. I also looked at the Nvidia offerings before making the decision, like the RTX 4060. Had the 4060 been built with at least 12 GB of vram, I might had considered it. 8 GB however is far to little in the long run in my opinion.
I have a Ryzen 7 3700x, and ASUS TUF B550 Plus motherboard with 32 gigs of ram. Which card would you guys recommend??
7600xt for long term
@@Chaotic_panda_XL , thank you for the help.
The catch is they forgot to include enough GPU for the 16GB, with the $300+ 16GB GPU....
I was wondering when someone would finally test this. Thanks, Danny!
Many on launch day. You’re late. Hardware Unboxed and Gamers Nexus gave the best reviews.
@@JayzBeerz I watched all the launch reviews but I don't think anyone put in the effort of actually testing whether VRAM limitations would actually even be an issue with this level of performance
@@b0ne91guess you have to check your eyesight then
@@b0ne91 ok but the VRAM does have limitations with a 128 Bit Bus.
3070 is still the sweet spot ^^ Great value in the second hand market too! Bang for the buck but msrp in a store I would go for 3060ti
Do you have a preference for AMD?
Just got this card for my kid have it paired with a 2600x and 16gb of ram he plays 1440p ultra wide
2:47 AMD did not design that shroud... The *brand partner* decided to not make any changes!
Used 6750xt for 250$ is the way, i know because i got one, the performance is great for the money.
Hey pc users! I recently got my first pc from switching from console and I’m having some issues that maybe some of you may be able to help me with! My first issue is that my pc will not update and I’ve done many solutions and even got on the phone with a Microsoft employee. Second issue is some of my steam games won’t launch if anyone has any ideas at all please feel free to reply, thanks
6700 XT for sure.
think i’d just get the 6700xt for the price.
Me looking over at my A770 16gb..... 😭
We needed a 7500 xt not a 7600 xt
So long as it doesn't murder the PCIE lanes the way the 6500XT did. That card was simply awful.
Fun fact, it kind of exists in the form of the W7500, and these pro versions usually perform like the consumer counterpart such as the W7600
i think its your system im playing diablo 4 on a gtx 1080 240 fps max everything
Just imagine you are buying an RX 7600 with an additional "ram stick".
The Catch: It's AMD. Not that great for where lots of VRAM is needed.
I got myself 3060 12GB for ~$300 and still most games barely use more than 6-8GB, but it's great for UE5, 3D Rendering and some AI stuff.
try ASA [ ark survival evolved Ascended ] and you will notice a difference in vram use. from its earlier game.. most games can do whit 8gb vram but UE5 engine deff pushing that to more vram use
Nice ❤
The rx 6800xt and non xt are one of the best 16gb gpu's that make sense at its price
yep i have the 6800 non xt and i'm fairly certain it`s gonna last the entire playstation 5 generation without issue
4060 is a better deal by software and cuda. Dlss is superior especially in lower resolutions that this gpus are aiming for, and RTX is possible in 1080p dlss on nvidia also the cuda are useful in some productivity software. And I own amd
Once it drops to $250 it'll be the card to get
I think AMD seems to find good sweet spot with this card. As games utilize more GPU memory, performance is gonna be much better. And it has AI cores! Perhaps games should also use that in the near future
Never buy a card on launch day. Wait a few months for the price to drop.
Good card, could have been great, 128 bus will hold this card back.
not very accessible vram with such a smol bit bus RIP
in my country a 4060 Ti 8gb is just $30 more expensive and absolutely slaps the ever living shit out of the 7600 XT. check your market first guys
Bing Chiling
Bruh, Amazon don't even stock these. They're ashamed of AMD.
It should be 299$, nothing more, nothing less. AMD missing the sweetspot as usual.
@@disguiseddv8ant486 Absolutely, that's a lot of money in the budget tier.
@@disguiseddv8ant486 stop the cryin. That card isn't worth 330. It should be 299. It's that simple, It has nothing to do with what you or I can afford or not.
I would love to se AMD take some marketshare from Nvidia, but they constantly missing the mark.
In one of the biggest resellers in Sweden only 3 cards have been sold since launch. That's a train wreck of a gpu launch!
They constantly put on a to high of a price on all there new gpus and get bad reviews. Totally worthless marketing. This card will soon be 299 and will slowly start selling better, but the damage will be done already with bad reviews.
Not CUDA :(.
Also, memory bandwidth > VRAM.
Lol AMD is so petty. They went directly for Intel's neck with a 16GB card for $330, the exact price of the 16GB Limited Edition Arc A770...
Just get Rx 6800 for 389
You are better of buying last gen even new for that money even some 6650 xt cards are better
have to remember the 7600xt and I hope AMD will improve there track record when it comes to drivers and get this bottle neck fixed with a driver update. I like my AMD but they need to get there act together when it comes to drivers.
im still using my rtx 2070🤣
isn't it better tho ?
Same!! Still rocking R5 2600x paired with RTX 2060 super, trying to keep up with my 32" 1440p monitor is getting rough! I need a upgrade soon, but still able to play BG3 on high settings above 90 fps so I'm still happy. And alot older games still great!
@@robertanderson5735 RTX 2060 Super is a great card. but in games like ASA your pretty much doomed to run it on low settings to have around 20-30 fps only. its deff lacking in vram whit its only 8gb vram.. even whit my new gpu 7800 XT im up in 11gb vram use but then settings on medium and around 90 fps.
Hello from Seattle! This was completely unnecessary and nobody asked for this. The memory bus will be the limitation not the vram because you will not use this unless you’re doing things like video editing or content creation. Games won’t use more vram than the memory bus allows.
bro can i get some money to get my laptop repaired please🙏
Nobody cares about ray tracing, just a marketing gimmick.
you get what you pay for in Nvidia.... AMD is the GreatValue of GPU's