FULL LENGTH Training Video of a LOW STAKES Live $1-$3 Match the Stack No Limit Hold'em Game
Vložit
- čas přidán 15. 08. 2020
- A full length poker strategy video that covers navigating live mid-stakes 3 Bet pots, from CrushLivePoker.com.
If you want to improve your live win-rate checkout the best training site for NL cash games in the business, Crush Live Poker: bit.ly/3KUGxyM.
Join the CLP Discord community and follow our socials:
►DISCORD► / discord
►FACEBOOK► / crushlivepoker
►INSTAGRAM► / crushlivepoker
►TWITTER► / crushlivepoker - Hry
Bart thanks for all the great free content. I have subscribed in the past, I'm not a current subscriber. You have helped my game so much n I love when I get a CLP notification. Thanks man
Glad to help!
Hey Bart, have been following your content for over a year. dont know how I missed out on this series. Its really great! Its a great opportunity to get access to your thoughts to "mundane" or "unexciting" hands (the most common kind) as opposed to really unique spots brought forward by callers in the regular call-in episodes
Thanks for your hard work Bart! I love your videos
as a low stakes player I love the analysis. Bro thanks for the help, I hope one day I will be able to buy in to the stakes you do. Keep it up bud
This is a great channel with great insight. I currently play $1/$2 NLH. And I'm seeing mistakes I do that you point out. Mainly bluffing with the wrong hands at the wrong times. Keep it up!
Very good and clear instruction.
This is a sick video nice
10 man table? God why?
The best thing about this videos is seeing that most people don't have a clue what's going on. I would love to sit at that table for a few hours!! I'm not really that good but watching this and seeing their hole cards and how much these guys gamble is crazy!
What do you mean by 3 betting linearly at around 32:10?
Hey why do u say it plays like a 5-5 k game my local poker room I play at is 1-3 nl and the max buyin is the same amount as the table chip leader. Is that the same thing
In the first hand, I put him on exactly and only QQ or JJ. He looked scared on the A and when KK didn't bet, he assumed he had the best hand.
Great vid as always Bart
2 questions Re the KJdd vs AJo hand
1. 33 opened for 45$. AJ 3b to 200$. Effective stack of $1600 (33). Hes not getting the right odds to set mine yet you said he should call all pairs in the SB/late/button configuration.
The situation is also Further complicated by the rec in the SB who VPIP 50% had just flatted his open and likely to flat especially if the button called the 3! Thus isn’t it an easy fold instead as it’s impossible to call a single bet if you don’t hit your set even heads up, if somehow the SB folded (but if he’s been playing there any more than an hour or two is probably quite aware of his VPIP and play style ), but especially multi-way
2. Turn was 3rd club. AJ o has the Ac and calls the $300 bet. That’s standard
River shove you said it’s worse he has the Ac as you want the V to have it for bluffing purposes
Well that’s true if there’s 2 clubs on board but there are 3 clubs on board. That and the guy being a rec all 2 card club flushes could be jammed esp by this player type
Thus holding the Ac is almost irrelevant
Not irrelevant but all it tells the perceivesd H of the hand is he doesn’t have the nuts (nuts changes on the river when the 4 pairs, making it even more impossible to call as V could shove a huge amount of hands here - anything from trips to flushes to boats).
If the 3rd club didn’t peel off I totally get it and agree, but as there are 3 clubs, and especially as V is a rec-maniac type, the “value” of holding the Ac is almost irrelevant in my eyes anyway
Anyway concept and points taken and mainly agreed upon
Thanks for taking so much of your time and effort on these outstanding productions 👍🏻👍🏻
Really great questions/thoughts. I could not agree more. I also think AJ can be the bottom call here. AT must fold. But looking at all the hands against a maniac, AJ can call sometimes. Turn over your AJ when you call. Send a message to table you’re unbluffable. That’s high EV against a maniac and the rest of the table.
That happened to me. Accidental bluff. Guy rips it in on the river after missing his straight draw but hitting a pair. I call with AK putting him on the missed flush but he goes you’re good I just have a pair 🤦🏼♂️
@17:00 what's the point of raising 40% of our stack when we're against a player who knows we're not folding. Just letting him free roll the last 500 on the turn. Not that big of an overbet, just jam all the hands we want to raise.
Na, Don is value betting here after the A is checked and just without much analysing is assuming he 'probably' has the best hand. So often a check is read as over-weakness and he just stuck in half pot. That what it looks like to me.
I think the description is for the last vid lol
Huh?
CrushlivePoker “should you check the second nuts”
The description for this video currently says "Bart talks about his own hand and checking 2nd nuts on the river".
The guy above is suggesting that video description wasn't updated from the previous video.
Ah you mean the 2nd paragraph? I didn’t realize that. Fixed, thank you. Bart
I enjoy your content. Thank you for your time.
10:44 Plus his body language seems off. He’s closed armed and isn’t that a sign of weakness?
Is this really 1/3 ? That’s a huge stack for 1/3
Fell asleep twice watching this
I would have snapped with KK ... You can't send a message to the table that you will fold to any river bet after 3 betting the flop nor is check/fold your go to move.
Man these guys got so many chip handling tells commonly seen at $1-3 and $2-5.
Can u explaine a few I'm new to poker for real money
Caitlin trap tshirt
Knew it was QQ when AJ only had 16% equity on the flop... the maths
Not true. You can tip dealers in TX with real chips unless the rules have changes since this video was made.
Bart,
A pet peeve of mine is that you constantly say “fold out” when you mean “fold.”
To “fold out” a hand is to get your opponent to fold. To “fold” a hand is when you yourself fold.
It’s kind of like the difference between “rent” and “rent out.” You would never say “I’m renting out a house” if you’re the one paying rent and living there (as opposed to you being the landlord).
English is such a beautiful language
"I am renting out a beach house for the weekend".
@@christopherfrench2755 yeah, that would mean you own a beach house and you're renting it out to someone for the weekend.
@@robbanks6076 no, your wrong. But continue to try and correct people English, surely will not get you very far I life.
@@christopherfrench2755 "your wrong"
surely you're just trolling me now, am i right?
Why does CrushlivePoker give info about chances that are wrong?
14:15 AQu versus A9s is NOT 55 45. It is 66 28 (and a 6%tie).
Bart, your one of the best commentators and you seem to participate in CrushlivePoker. What are you going to do about this?
What are you talking about the live at the bike graphics? The graphics on all of these streams take into account the dead cards. Has nothing to do w CrushLivePoker. Bart
@@CrushlivePoker Bart, Thanks for the super fast reaction and clarifying this issue.
If you take the dead cards into account, the chances as live given, are indeed correct!
[ 14:15 AQu vs A9s is: 55% 45% including dead cards. 69% 31% without ].
In this example the dead cards make a difference of 14% compared to the chances without them.
Amazing. Did not realise this could be the case. Srry for the discomfort, I brought upon you.
If these chances have nothing to do with CrushLivePoker, I gladly leave to your judgement.
Jan
.
Tip chips 😂 What’s even the point
Thing is , Bart…I think you’re underestimating the skill level of the texas players in these games. In hand #1 we saw an almost bryn kenneyesk like advanced bluff to get the guy to lay down KK. These texas players are playing above the rim, just ask Doug Poke.
Are you serious ? The QQ thought he had the best hand on the river so he value bet. not a bluff. KK too nitty to realize nobody had an Ace.