This is $450 vs $330 Considering Raw performance. 4060 Ti 8GB needs to be at $300 while 16GB needs to be under $350 Similarly 4060 should drop down to $230 Nvidia is ripping off gamers at the entry level segment of the market
It's kind of sad to see how expensive graphics cards have become. Nowadays you're paying 300 plus for a graphics card and it would just be good enough for 1080p. Considering the cost of an Xbox Series S to me it feels crazy.
to me its just a period of technology stuck or even a agreement between the two companies,because they new series uplift 10 procent performance only. is this a joke ? and people buying the same stuff. crazy
As mentioned before, Series S uses upscaling and 30FPS lock. Also keep in mind a PC is much more versatile than a Console. Work, Office, Internet, and so on. Not to mention for every Console game there are round about 100 PC games.
rx 7600 xt 16gb strangely similar situation with rx 580 8gb that still relevant to this day and now we can get it with $50. But who's know if 5 plus years later this rx 7600 xt 16gb replace rx 580 8gb and be the best cheapest gpu around $300 and keep in mind about inflation too.🤭
6700 xt better over 7600 xt for a similar price... such a useless card even with 16gb vram, you will not hit the vram wall because it's too weak in rasterization. also 128bit bus is not great...
@@kushan8113 what was high end about it? performance was at the time it was weaker than 1070 and competed with the 1060 vega 56 and vega 64 both were more powerful not to mention the rx 590
i went from an rx 580 msi oc edition to a 2080 ti, and the difference is night and day, the 580 lasted me quite a while, i got it in 2016. and just replaced it in 2023. so i am betting a 7600 xt would last a while. considering a lot of what is coming out for games, is kinda trash.
I think it's marketing. Previous generations had eight, competitors already have sixteen. It was necessary to give the buyer a “psychologically” competitive product with a reserve for the future.
@@T1MKA_375no doubt a marketing what an a excuse for you to have the same graphics card with just more memory like amd thinks consumers will buy this trash (unfortunately there are some) but who go online to see "analysis" more like test of its performance will make a better buy cuz they know to what perhaps they'll expect when they buy the actual product
I went with the 7600 xt since it was cheaper than the 4060 ti where I live. The 16gb vram will come in handy a year or two from now. I plan on keeping this card a good 4-5 years at least. Probably at least until the next PS and Xbox. Its just sad to see price to performance ratio be so shit this gpu generation.
Is it really that close? Why spend the 100 more? i am thinking about getting the 7600 xt or the 4060 ti 8gb. Dont know what to pick, but it looks like the AMD card is a better value.
16GB VRAM is overkill for a GPU with those types of specs. 99% of the time, the 4060 Ti and 7600 XT are going to lack GPU horsepower before even hitting close to the VRAM limit.
Gaming is a bad thing but from the beginning both nvidia and amd said from the beginning that they are aimed at working people, that is a good price of course with a new card but if optimizing costs for work I think Still should invest a little more and get the old rtx 3090 hc 3090ti.
You either have enough vram or you dont. Nobody complains the 3090 has 24gb of vram even though no game uses that much and likely wont until after the ps6 comes out.
No you want at least 12gb of vram even in 1080p as of today. That is because Game Devs are starting to utilize VRAM because of GPU VRAM leap since 2021. Now we are seeing it in some games, i.e. if you don't have enough VRAM the game might work but use the RAM as VRAM but now you have fewer overall FPS. The newest update is when you have not enough VRAM then the game will crash and require you to lower the setting to reduce VRAM usage, yes even in 1080p. It's always either of the two... But I think the new update will be use more often in the future games and game updates. Which is why you want a 1080p GPU with 12GB of VRAM since 12 will be good enough. While for 1440p 12GB is just a bare minimum but still not enough, means you need a 16GB VRAM so yeah the current sweet spot is 16GB for 1440p & 12GB for 1080p.
Also having 16gb in both 7600xt & 4060ti is not bad at all. What's not good enough are 1440p GPUs that has 12GB VRAM it should be 16GB as bare minimum.
interesting to see how much the NV card is more efficient with the memory, i have seen the same with 7900XTX/4090 but to a lesser degree. is it the driver ? is it texture compression ?
A 7900 XTX foi feita para concorrer contra a rtx 4080 jamais contra rtx 4090 essa sua comparação esta muito errada. A 7900 XT concorre com rtx 4070 TI. 7800 XT contra rtx 4070 e etc melhor pesquisar antes cara.
I actually waited for the rx 7600 xt thinking they would slightly bumb the performance from 7600 and giving it like a 12gb vram. But nope they focused all that on giving it 16gb vram and slightly higher clock speed.
it's interesting how an AMD card loads up to 2.5GB more VRAM into its buffer than an nvidia card even if both have enough vram left to spare. something tells me AMD is just more wasteful at resource management. so next time you see an AMD card load up 9GB or more vram, it doesnt automatically mean an 8GB nvidia card cant play the game properly.
AMD might be trying to maximize performance by loading more into the RAM before it’s actually needed or Nvidia may be doing the opposite to conserve memory since most of their models are not very generous with RAM capacity. Seems like Nvidia is pretty purposely giving us just enough RAM to keep the card comfortable for 2-3 years that way we’ll run into a bottle neck and be pressured to upgrade. Idk regardless it isn’t really a problem when you get so much RAM in AMD cards these days.
@@johnmoore1495 It's not entirely true that games on xbox So it can be said that the fact that on PC gpu with 8gb of vram cannot play games at 1080p is absurd, it's all due to bad optimization, you need to know that the technology and level of hardware usage of the game over time depends on depends on how much the current console hardware can handle and it's easy to say that currently the most advanced generation consoles only have 16 Gb of ram and it uses SOC so the maximum consumption for the game can only be falls into 13 - 14 gb and certainly in native 4k the remaining 2 - 3 gb must be left for the system to run
Because the 6700xt and even the 6700 actually cost slightly more at retail than the 7600xt does at retail, while being roughly the same performance but with the 7600xt being newer. Seriously though, if you have no interest in the 7600xt why does it bother you and just about every other nerd here, in the comments for a video about a gpu you have no interest in?!
@@scbond You're saying i'm wrong for commenting on a GPU performance under a vid that's about GPU performance? Alright dude. Yeah now i see 7600xt costing the same. Also what is 6700 without xt?
mostly the power consumption. The 6700 and 6750 XT are really good 1440p cards except they can use over 200w of power and can spike up to to 400w in rare occasions.
It is not a fair competition at all. While the i9 13900k processor does not bottleneck the 4060Ti, it bottlenecks the RX7500XY by 14.7% and that is why it cannot give full performance and reduces the fps. Please do RTX with INTEL in your next videos, do it with AMD and AMD processor.
The RTX 4060 Ti with 16GB of VRAM performs better with DLSS, FG and ray tracing at 4K resolution. Considering the price, it might be more worthwhile to invest in an RTX 4070 instead.
It's because of the bus size, we saw how Nvidia had to raise the 4070Ti Super bus to 256-bit in order to fit 16GBs in that card, if they kept the 192-bit bus, the only other option would be 18 or 24 but 4GB VRAM chips doesn't exist and the card doesn't have space in the back for extra chips.
@@marcelosoares7148 that is my point. The ti super should be the original ti in the 1st place. 16gb instead of 12gb. They change the bus size anyway with the super
guys buy theRX 7600 XT 16GB its awesome you get 16 gb plus more then 120 watt thats the important thing, if you think all 12 gb graphic card cost fu 500 bucks. and i have good eys the rtx 4060 ti is lagging sometimes i saw in this video. the rx 7600 xt is perfect !!! ill buy if my loan comes 6 days to wait
and lets be honest 1080p full hd is perfect everythin above you dont even see a notive only if you go ultra ultra 4k like these television with this incredible colors
If you could wait half a year it would be good Right now the rx 6700xt is much much better But rx 7600xt may get better than it cuz of drivers maturity in 7000 series
4070 super or 7800XT would be good options. If you want to spend a little more, you could go for 4070Ti super or 7900XT. For CPU, almost anything from Zen 4 will be good, just skip 7600x and 7700x. The non-X models are basically the same performance for cheaper
rx 6800 gpu with a 5700 x3d cpu.that will leave you with 800 bucks to buy any mobo and case you want with enough money to get over 4 terabytes of storage. There's no need to blow all your budget on overpriced gpus. Take a look at the games you want to play. All the best games coming out are Indie games that will run on modest hardware. You can save on your budget to get a good monitor and other stuff.
The RX 7600XT is actually a pretty great card, its almost as fast as a RX 6700XT similarily priced, but with newer tech and 4GB more vram. I bet with a few driver updates it might even surpass the 6700XT in raw performance.
@@zilverman7820 After multiple years the 7600XT will stand its own, not only due to the vram but probably also by optimization. In my country the 7600XT is also about 40$ cheaper so although it's not an amazing card by any means it's honestly not that bad.
@@zilverman7820 yea but a lot more vram, 8gigs just isn't enough for a lot of games at 1080p anymore and certainly not at 1440p. This is not a bad card for 330$ if you are upgrading from a few generations back
@@SergeantThugtf u mean? the future should be 150w or 200w power draws for the same performance of 4090 thats what should aiming for and not 1000watts but more fps we need less watts big performance like 9999 fps wheres ur brain? 😂
its just msi afterburner bug, the actual memory speed is 9000 mhz, notice that both of these gpus have 2250 mhz memory (18gbps effective if it is devided by 2 it will now show actual memory speed in mhz)
I am waiting for the next gen cards, ALL current cards are too weak and poor value for money. I will not spend hundreds of dollars to get 30 to 40 FPS on new games like this with sub 30 fps 1 percent lows, 2k should be the norm now.
Před 4 měsíci
İlla 16 GB isterim diyenlere cevap ekran kartları...:=))) Daha iyi bir seçenek RX-7700X 12 GB ekran kartı...
never ending loop here... only a bunch of games are meaningfully using 16GB vram but AMD and NVIDIA strategy of binning gpu die chips so they can launch apparently competing products for too expensive price vs too much more expensive price is so convenient for profits... as computing processing units pcie cards they may have sense but as gaming devices, it turns out waht should be the pair of no-brainer gpus to go and buy are just unimpressive and to equivalent to former generation that only power needs are a change to consider and check twice for the price ....
I appreciate this video, I'm looking at parts for my first build and this video shows that I'll be just fine with the 7600 xt. The over $100 price difference isn't worth it
en estabilidad es mejor las tarjetas amd que nvidia ,de todas maneras mientras haya ingenuos del pc sacarán y sacarán nuevas tarjetas cuando en realidad no hacen falta si los juegos los optimizaran al 100 por 100 ,es lo mismo que el 2k al 4k ,para que tanta tontería ,si para distinguirlo tienes que tener conocimientos ,estar a 40 cmt del tv y las imagines paradas ,y la diferencia es irrisoria los que usan pc les esta bien empleado por cantamañanas ,cada año con las mismas tonterías dejándose la pasta en tarjetas gráficas y procesadores un día si y otro también cuando en 1080 en gráficos altos es mas que suficiente para ver bien los juegos ,
Через пол года RX7600XTX с увеличенной шиной, чек. Так обосраться как АМД, нужно уметь. Были все шансы заткнуть нвидиа ХОТЯ БЫ в нижнем сегменте, но мы любим срать не снимая штаны.
I don't suppose anyone would aim for RT with either of these cards, maybe low RT is doable, but ideally for best RT performance you're at least looking for 4070.
No, they are 1080p cards. But a lot of people want to see how much head space there is, regarding to how long it will provide them with a decent performance.
Absolutely, you watched the video right? Both were able to put out more than 60fps in most of the games, apart from couple of poorly optimized games such as scamfield, AW2 etc. And this is with ultra, if you turn settings down by notch or fiddle a bit then you're gonna get more fps, most probably looking at 80+ fps, moreover you know there's no visual upgrade using ultra vs high (as demonstarted in a DF video) settings.
Definitely not 1440p cards. Recently bought the 7900 GRE for a new build and was thinking about using it for 1080p because of shitty games perform these days.
Hold my dlss, dlaa, dldsr, Nvidia broadcast, driver stability, raytracing performance, encoding performance, Nvidia reflex, video super resolution upscaling, the new hdr tool
Alan wake 2 que usa novas tecnologias discorda do seu comentario. O futuro para jogos pesados com novas tecnologias vai exigir muito das placas e 8 GB ja esta fracassando. Agora se for para cod, fifa, minecraft etc ai ok
AMD always looses..... Meanwhile 7900XTX beats 4080, 7900Xt beats 4070ti and 7800xt beats 4070. And all that while also being cheaper. The only advantage Nvida has is Raytracing performance, but that comes at a price while 99,9% of all games doesn't even have Raytracing.
@@AntiGrieferGames You are right, but how many people make real use of that? 1% to 3%? And what about Vulcan, where AMD is far better optimized? It's an argument, for sure, but unfortunately not a good one.
@@walther2492 How in the hell it’s better when the 4090 kicks all amd cards ass wtf😂😂you can’t be better if you cannot beat the king of the card the 4090. Let’s be honest they said the 7900 xtx will beat the 4090 until they realize it couldn’t compete they started comparing it too the 4080. Explain that? The 4080 super is on the way tho and it’s going to smack the xt & xtx
@@MockingCat technically i like the 4060 ti more cause of dlss and ray tracing but its not like its running ray tracing anyway and you can just get the fsr 3 mod in most games now. But I still think both are shit
Right! So if you yourself are saying that you would buy the RTX 4060 TI then you are contradicting yourself in relation to your first statement! Have a good time...@@Soimy
@@MockingCat I didn’t say I would buy it lol. I said if I had to that I would rather have the 4060 ti. But I actually have a 7800 xt which is probably way better than your card lmao. And i dont know why you’re trying to make beef because i think that the 4060 ti is shit lol. Go check any review. They all say it’s shit.
@@rsh2099от балды прикинул тут: если взять дефолтного работягу, который стабильно играет 3 часа каждый день на карте от зеленых, которая в нагрузке примерно на 50Вт экономичнее карты от красных, то в год мы имеем примерно 1113 часов наигрыша и приблизительно 54 кВт сэкономленной электроэнергии, что в денежном эквиваленте при среднероссийских 5р/кВт равняется экономии 273 рублей в год. Да, у западных товарищей 1 кВт электроэнергии значительно дороже, но и зарплаты пропорционально выше, в итоге получается примерно та же самая разница в соотношении. Хотелось бы немного пояснить за 2 момента: 1) в расчет бралось то, что человек будет играть КАЖДЫЙ день по 3 часа, далеко не все наиграют столько часов за год, но и есть люди, кто наиграет больше 2) примерная разница в 50 Вт между картами только в самых тяжелых играх, в более старых или менее требовательных к железу совершенно необязательно, что карта будет загружена на все 100%, и тогда потребление сократится, как и разница в пиковой мощности между картами.
@@MakeYourVision Не у каждого есть мощный блок питания. Мне просто не хочется 8 тыщ за новый блок питания отдавать...Так бы купил 3080 на авито за 40к.Эх..
@@andrewkalapan9117 вы увидели и смогли ответить на мой коммент? А то я сейчас открываю уведомления, вижу ваш ответ, перехожу по ссылке - нет моего коммента, будто удален. Открываю в пк версии - тоже самое, пустота, только ваш ответ в никуда.
Games :
Remnant 2 - 0:20
CYBERPUNK 2077 - 1:12 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesCP2077
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora - 2:09
Hitman 3 - 3:11 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesHitman3
Forza Horizon 5 - 4:15 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesForza5
Alan Wake 2 - 5:25
Red Dead Redemption 2 - 6:31 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesRDR2
Resident Evil 4 - 7:29
Starfield - 8:28
Hogwarts Legacy - 9:23 - gvo.deals/TG3HogwartsLegacy
System:
Windows 11
Core i9-13900K - bit.ly/3SgY3xf
ASUS ROG Strix Z790-E Gaming - bit.ly/3scEZpc
G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB 32GB DDR5 6000MHz CL38
CPU Cooler - Arctic Liquid Freezer II 420 - bit.ly/3Pn2xVx
RADEON RX 7600 XT 16GB - bit.ly/42gM3T9
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB - bit.ly/3Om3RXu
SSD - 2xSAMSUNG 970 EVO M.2 2280 1TB - bit.ly/2NmWeQe
Power Supply CORSAIR RM850i 850W - bit.ly/3i2VoGI
Isn't this a 1080p card
This is $450 vs $330
Considering Raw performance. 4060 Ti 8GB needs to be at $300 while 16GB needs to be under $350
Similarly 4060 should drop down to $230
Nvidia is ripping off gamers at the entry level segment of the market
You're totally right
Amd is more wack with their 7600 and 7600xt. The only impressive in 4060 ti is its performance and power but the price is not acceptable.
And 7600xt should be $5 ,,, weak product from a company that never fails to fail
@@tilapiadave3234 which graficcard under 350 would you recommend?
@@king_gomer Tough part of the market ,, if I was after something to keep for a while I'd look for a used rx 6800xt
It's kind of sad to see how expensive graphics cards have become. Nowadays you're paying 300 plus for a graphics card and it would just be good enough for 1080p. Considering the cost of an Xbox Series S to me it feels crazy.
Xbox series S runs new games at sub HD upscaled to 1080p and 30fps. Waste of $$
then get a console bro, and pay for online😂😂😂
Xbox series S has weaker GPUs than RX 7600 XT. It often runs sub 1080p without 60 fps mode. Still viable option: less performance for less money.
to me its just a period of technology stuck or even a agreement between the two companies,because they new series uplift 10 procent performance only. is this a joke ? and people buying the same stuff. crazy
As mentioned before, Series S uses upscaling and 30FPS lock. Also keep in mind a PC is much more versatile than a Console.
Work, Office, Internet, and so on. Not to mention for every Console game there are round about 100 PC games.
an unpopularity contest has no winners
Fact 👍🏻
😅😂
Yes the 4060ti
rx 7600 xt 16gb strangely similar situation with rx 580 8gb that still relevant to this day and now we can get it with $50. But who's know if 5 plus years later this rx 7600 xt 16gb replace rx 580 8gb and be the best cheapest gpu around $300 and keep in mind about inflation too.🤭
Rx 580 was high-end card. Chip in rx7600 too weak to run future games
6700 xt better over 7600 xt for a similar price... such a useless card even with 16gb vram, you will not hit the vram wall because it's too weak in rasterization. also 128bit bus is not great...
@@kushan8113 what was high end about it? performance was at the time it was weaker than 1070 and competed with the 1060
vega 56 and vega 64 both were more powerful
not to mention the rx 590
i went from an rx 580 msi oc edition to a 2080 ti, and the difference is night and day, the 580 lasted me quite a while, i got it in 2016. and just replaced it in 2023. so i am betting a 7600 xt would last a while. considering a lot of what is coming out for games, is kinda trash.
@@kushan8113 high end ? in the 1080ti era ? nop, mid range at max
4060 Ti consuming 30% less power while being faster than AMD. Not good for AMD.
its been not good at all, nvidia won in every area like every esp w 4000 series
The only thing I don’t understand is why AMD made this graphics card with 16GB of memory
Wanted less? Lol
Chipset cheaper than software
Wanted to give you excuse so they can sell it while maintaining nvidia like actions that's why
I think it's marketing. Previous generations had eight, competitors already have sixteen. It was necessary to give the buyer a “psychologically” competitive product with a reserve for the future.
@@T1MKA_375no doubt a marketing what an a excuse for you to have the same graphics card with just more memory like amd thinks consumers will buy this trash (unfortunately there are some) but who go online to see "analysis" more like test of its performance will make a better buy cuz they know to what perhaps they'll expect when they buy the actual product
I went with the 7600 xt since it was cheaper than the 4060 ti where I live. The 16gb vram will come in handy a year or two from now. I plan on keeping this card a good 4-5 years at least. Probably at least until the next PS and Xbox. Its just sad to see price to performance ratio be so shit this gpu generation.
Is it really that close? Why spend the 100 more? i am thinking about getting the 7600 xt or the 4060 ti 8gb. Dont know what to pick, but it looks like the AMD card is a better value.
amd for gaming
@@user-tb2zk2ip4f i have to say i agree, i would find myself hard pressed to spend 100 dollars more for a minuscule amount of fps.
16GB VRAM is overkill for a GPU with those types of specs. 99% of the time, the 4060 Ti and 7600 XT are going to lack GPU horsepower before even hitting close to the VRAM limit.
Gaming is a bad thing but from the beginning both nvidia and amd said from the beginning that they are aimed at working people, that is a good price of course with a new card but if optimizing costs for work I think Still should invest a little more and get the old rtx 3090 hc 3090ti.
10GB or 12GB the 4060 Ti needed 16GB for the 4070 TI and 16-20GB for the 4080 would’ve been best
You either have enough vram or you dont. Nobody complains the 3090 has 24gb of vram even though no game uses that much and likely wont until after the ps6 comes out.
No you want at least 12gb of vram even in 1080p as of today.
That is because Game Devs are starting to utilize VRAM because of GPU VRAM leap since 2021.
Now we are seeing it in some games, i.e. if you don't have enough VRAM the game might work but use the RAM as VRAM but now you have fewer overall FPS.
The newest update is when you have not enough VRAM then the game will crash and require you to lower the setting to reduce VRAM usage, yes even in 1080p.
It's always either of the two... But I think the new update will be use more often in the future games and game updates.
Which is why you want a 1080p GPU with 12GB of VRAM since 12 will be good enough.
While for 1440p 12GB is just a bare minimum but still not enough, means you need a 16GB VRAM so yeah the current sweet spot is 16GB for 1440p & 12GB for 1080p.
Also having 16gb in both 7600xt & 4060ti is not bad at all.
What's not good enough are 1440p GPUs that has 12GB VRAM it should be 16GB as bare minimum.
interesting to see how much the NV card is more efficient with the memory, i have seen the same with 7900XTX/4090 but to a lesser degree.
is it the driver ? is it texture compression ?
Talvez por causa de maior cache l3?
A 7900 XTX foi feita para concorrer contra a rtx 4080 jamais contra rtx 4090 essa sua comparação esta muito errada. A 7900 XT concorre com rtx 4070 TI. 7800 XT contra rtx 4070 e etc melhor pesquisar antes cara.
You guys don't get how VRAM works lol it could say 10gb and still only use 4gb. It's ALLOCATED MEMORY.....
Allocation vs utilization. Go learn that.
Yes nvidia uses texture compression, but in some games you get blurrier images when the game uses too much vram but thats rare
I actually waited for the rx 7600 xt thinking they would slightly bumb the performance from 7600 and giving it like a 12gb vram. But nope they focused all that on giving it 16gb vram and slightly higher clock speed.
Should buy 4070 or 7600xt?
4070 bro@@robbenvanpersie1562
@@robbenvanpersie15624070
Both a waste of silicon...
Waste of sand.
@@saricubra2867waste of market
correct me if i am wrong but wont the 16gb vram come in handy in the long run?considering the price of both cards
@@forbie4404 no 16GB is not needed in these graphic card
@@kimo4530yeah, this gpu's are never gonna touch 4k thus making every bit of that vram useless. Even at 2k gaming it's useless in my opinion.
wow 😃 im getting a pc with a 4060 ti and 5600x and considering i have a gt 1030 i5 4570 this is an upgrade for me!
Wow 😊
nice bro,
I'm also upgrading from an i5 2500 and a gt 520 to a i7 13700 and rtx 4070
Bro this video helped me very much to select which gpu to use thank you so much ❤❤
It doesn't matter which GPU you have, Hogwarts Legacy runs like crap.
True LOL, it runs crap even on my 4080.
and for gta you cant go above 180 on gta so you gotta turn up some settings a bit
Uh I was waiting for 4070 ti super vs this 😢
it's interesting how an AMD card loads up to 2.5GB more VRAM into its buffer than an nvidia card even if both have enough vram left to spare. something tells me AMD is just more wasteful at resource management. so next time you see an AMD card load up 9GB or more vram, it doesnt automatically mean an 8GB nvidia card cant play the game properly.
AMD might be trying to maximize performance by loading more into the RAM before it’s actually needed or Nvidia may be doing the opposite to conserve memory since most of their models are not very generous with RAM capacity. Seems like Nvidia is pretty purposely giving us just enough RAM to keep the card comfortable for 2-3 years that way we’ll run into a bottle neck and be pressured to upgrade.
Idk regardless it isn’t really a problem when you get so much RAM in AMD cards these days.
@@johnmoore1495 It's not entirely true that games on xbox So it can be said that the fact that on PC gpu with 8gb of vram cannot play games at 1080p is absurd, it's all due to bad optimization, you need to know that the technology and level of hardware usage of the game over time depends on depends on how much the current console hardware can handle and it's easy to say that currently the most advanced generation consoles only have 16 Gb of ram and it uses SOC so the maximum consumption for the game can only be falls into 13 - 14 gb and certainly in native 4k the remaining 2 - 3 gb must be left for the system to run
NVIDIA GPUs require a lot more RAM in contrast. There you can find the gigs that AMD have in their VRAM which it should be used for
@@chetu6792 not always. in hitman they both require same amounts of normal ram. in forza horizon 5 amd requires more vram and more regular ram too.
nvidia simply superior ,, and AMD releases yet another space heater
Trash Cards. None of them are worth it.
What’s the point of 7600xt if 6700xt costs even less and has better performance…
Because the 6700xt and even the 6700 actually cost slightly more at retail than the 7600xt does at retail, while being roughly the same performance but with the 7600xt being newer.
Seriously though, if you have no interest in the 7600xt why does it bother you and just about every other nerd here, in the comments for a video about a gpu you have no interest in?!
@@scbond You're saying i'm wrong for commenting on a GPU performance under a vid that's about GPU performance? Alright dude.
Yeah now i see 7600xt costing the same. Also what is 6700 without xt?
mostly the power consumption. The 6700 and 6750 XT are really good 1440p cards except they can use over 200w of power and can spike up to to 400w in rare occasions.
It is not a fair competition at all. While the i9 13900k processor does not bottleneck the 4060Ti, it bottlenecks the RX7500XY by 14.7% and that is why it cannot give full performance and reduces the fps. Please do RTX with INTEL in your next videos, do it with AMD and AMD processor.
Guys is it worth it to use the RX 7600 XT for 1080p?
Is DLSS frame generation on for the 4060?
nope
The RTX 4060TI 16GB is the better card, but not that much better it would justify double the price of an RX 7600 XT 16GB in my country.
its true if its 2x price, not worth at all, 6700xt supposedly even cheaper
Horrible disaster there is no reason to buy 4060 ti for up to 10% performance and around 5-7% more fps in worst case scenario
The RTX 4060 Ti with 16GB of VRAM performs better with DLSS, FG and ray tracing at 4K resolution. Considering the price, it might be more worthwhile to invest in an RTX 4070 instead.
These cards are not gaming cards these are diffusion related cards.
7600xt is not exciting at all but ask $450 for that poor performance on nvidia is crazy
They should honestly release failed dies of rx 7700xt and use that instead. Its bad that this is not as powerful as the rx 6700xt
7600xt the same price as 3060 ti gddr6x in my country. 7600xt is so not worth it.
I can't understand why lower end cards have more vram than the higher end ones. This trend needs to stop
It's because of the bus size, we saw how Nvidia had to raise the 4070Ti Super bus to 256-bit in order to fit 16GBs in that card, if they kept the 192-bit bus, the only other option would be 18 or 24 but 4GB VRAM chips doesn't exist and the card doesn't have space in the back for extra chips.
@@marcelosoares7148 that is my point. The ti super should be the original ti in the 1st place. 16gb instead of 12gb. They change the bus size anyway with the super
Thanks you have saved me lots of buck for not choosing 4060ti
guys buy theRX 7600 XT 16GB its awesome you get 16 gb plus more then 120 watt thats the important thing, if you think all 12 gb graphic card cost fu 500 bucks. and i have good eys the rtx 4060 ti is lagging sometimes i saw in this video. the rx 7600 xt is perfect !!! ill buy if my loan comes 6 days to wait
and lets be honest 1080p full hd is perfect everythin above you dont even see a notive only if you go ultra ultra 4k like these television with this incredible colors
Rx 6700xt vs 7600xt
Which one should I choose?
If you could wait half a year it would be good
Right now the rx 6700xt is much much better
But rx 7600xt may get better than it cuz of drivers maturity in 7000 series
6700xt if you want the av1 encoder that's about the only advantage it will ever have
oops I meant the 7600 sorry
6700xt if you can find it cheaper than a 7600xt. Almost identical performance + you can save bucks for future upgrade.
1080p GPUs.
Not 1440p.
Yup that's what I was thinking.
was dlss 3.0 activated during this?
what about 7700 xt so ? better than both i think ?
RTX 4060 Ti 16GB VS RX 7700 XT 12 GB ;)
7700xt will smoke it
Классные видюхи, вот выбираю ,какую из них купить за 60 тыщ. Мои старые Gt 730 4gb и rx570 8gb передают привет!
Я 4060ti 8гб за 35 брал
4070 по 50 бывают. По 60 это уже 4070 ti или super.
Interesting that RTX require 50W less than Radeon.
Testing. I Can played in 1080 p ultra setting with r9 7845 hx and rx 7600 m xt
anyone. Suggest me the best pc parts under 1500$. I want to build an full gaming PC (I am so confused which gpu to buy )
4070 super or 7800XT would be good options. If you want to spend a little more, you could go for 4070Ti super or 7900XT. For CPU, almost anything from Zen 4 will be good, just skip 7600x and 7700x. The non-X models are basically the same performance for cheaper
Thanks @@williamscott6209
rx 6800 gpu with a 5700 x3d cpu.that will leave you with 800 bucks to buy any mobo and case you want with enough money to get over 4 terabytes of storage. There's no need to blow all your budget on overpriced gpus. Take a look at the games you want to play. All the best games coming out are Indie games that will run on modest hardware. You can save on your budget to get a good monitor and other stuff.
@@darkkingastos4369 Thanks broo
@@williamscott6209 okk i will consider
The RX 7600XT is actually a pretty great card, its almost as fast as a RX 6700XT similarily priced, but with newer tech and 4GB more vram. I bet with a few driver updates it might even surpass the 6700XT in raw performance.
You are wrong. 7600xt is 7600 with just a 16gb ram. You just paying more money for the vram and minimal increase. 6700xt is a lot better.
@@zilverman7820 After multiple years the 7600XT will stand its own, not only due to the vram but probably also by optimization. In my country the 7600XT is also about 40$ cheaper so although it's not an amazing card by any means it's honestly not that bad.
@@Atomicvex06 but look at the performance its almost the same as a 7600 and the price is a lot higher.
@@zilverman7820 yea but a lot more vram, 8gigs just isn't enough for a lot of games at 1080p anymore and certainly not at 1440p. This is not a bad card for 330$ if you are upgrading from a few generations back
Карты почти равны, если не брать во внимание некоторые кривые игры.
И цену
is this even a fair comparison price-wise?
i really like how power efficient the 4060ti is, they need to make future gens more like it
No
in the future 8gb wont be enough
They better not make more GPU's like it
I am running a 4060 TI 16gb using it with Topaz Video AI with a 500w power supply so far no problems with the lower power supply.
@@SergeantThugtf u mean? the future should be 150w or 200w power draws for the same performance of 4090
thats what should aiming for and not 1000watts but more fps
we need less watts big performance like 9999 fps
wheres ur brain? 😂
Why put RE4 at 2gb textures?
Guys anyone please explain why Nvidia have 9000Mhz memory speed and Amd is just 2238Mhz..
Is it a bug in the monitoring tool?
its just msi afterburner bug, the actual memory speed is 9000 mhz, notice that both of these gpus have 2250 mhz memory (18gbps effective if it is devided by 2 it will now show actual memory speed in mhz)
Please do 7600xt vs 6700xt. Please
make a comparison video between 6750xt and 7600xt
6750xt is closer to 3080 and 6800, due to fast gddr6x being used, kind of rare gpu using it back then
ah and the 1st radeon hbm was fury series
its dumb to compare this card with the 4060 ti when price wise its nit meant to compete with it
its like comparing 7900 xtx with 4090
Rx 7600 xt 16gb should be 250$. At 330-350 its crap & trash?
So much waste
What happen with 12 gb VRAM chip supplier?
The cards have a 128bit memory bus which means quad channel memory, you can't fit 12GB on quad channel.
4060ti is the worst price performance gpu on the market. But nvidia fanboys love to overpay keep it up guys :)
the wattage its so high.
RX 7600 XT is a power hog.
I am waiting for the next gen cards, ALL current cards are too weak and poor value for money. I will not spend hundreds of dollars to get 30 to 40 FPS on new games like this with sub 30 fps 1 percent lows, 2k should be the norm now.
İlla 16 GB isterim diyenlere cevap ekran kartları...:=))) Daha iyi bir seçenek RX-7700X 12 GB ekran kartı...
Just get a RX 6800 XFX for $405 better than both these video cards
thanks for the upload!
Shit cards at expensive prices...
Just get a 6700xr
never ending loop here... only a bunch of games are meaningfully using 16GB vram but AMD and NVIDIA strategy of binning gpu die chips so they can launch apparently competing products for too expensive price vs too much more expensive price is so convenient for profits... as computing processing units pcie cards they may have sense but as gaming devices, it turns out waht should be the pair of no-brainer gpus to go and buy are just unimpressive and to equivalent to former generation that only power needs are a change to consider and check twice for the price ....
I appreciate this video, I'm looking at parts for my first build and this video shows that I'll be just fine with the 7600 xt. The over $100 price difference isn't worth it
En Latinoamérica el Rx7600xt está más cara que la 4060ti de 16gb
I have to imagine that will change in a few weeks
In the US, the 4060Ti 16GB is US$120 more
No generalices, no es lo mismo el precio en argentina, Guatemala o México.
@@kevinmendozamanzano6838 principalmente en Sudamérica se nota más la diferencia
In Brazil same price
Not here in Brazil
Always Nvidia due to extra features
These GPU are designed for 1K bro
Что то низковат ФПС в киберпанке на 4060ti
claramente gana la tarjeta de nvidia pero por $130 dolares de diferencia ni puto loco la compraba, me voy con AMD
en estabilidad es mejor las tarjetas amd que nvidia ,de todas maneras mientras haya ingenuos del pc sacarán y sacarán nuevas tarjetas cuando en realidad no hacen falta si los juegos los optimizaran al 100 por 100 ,es lo mismo que el 2k al 4k ,para que tanta tontería ,si para distinguirlo tienes que tener conocimientos ,estar a 40 cmt del tv y las imagines paradas ,y la diferencia es irrisoria los que usan pc les esta bien empleado por cantamañanas ,cada año con las mismas tonterías dejándose la pasta en tarjetas gráficas y procesadores un día si y otro también cuando en 1080 en gráficos altos es mas que suficiente para ver bien los juegos ,
Rx 7600 xt vs 6750 xt 🙏
Do it rx 6650xt vs 7600xt
The difference surely isn't worth $100-$120 but 7600 XT is still mediocre lol. 6700 XT for the win.
I wouldn't class any of these cards as 1440p tbh.
@@ornatus96166700xt is 1440p card
Where's RT tests?
Через пол года RX7600XTX с увеличенной шиной, чек. Так обосраться как АМД, нужно уметь. Были все шансы заткнуть нвидиа ХОТЯ БЫ в нижнем сегменте, но мы любим срать не снимая штаны.
Rx 7600 xt is trash
Both are trash for the price, the rx 6750 xt has more performance than a rx 7600 xt and is cheaper
Pls 7600xt vs 6700xt
Thank you so much
Yes now do the same with ray tracing dlss and frame gen on while the 7600xt crashesh in ray tracing lmao
only in cyberpunk and alan wake 2. some of the lesser known rt games amd cards perform quite close to nvidia ones, from metro exodus to dying light
I don't suppose anyone would aim for RT with either of these cards, maybe low RT is doable, but ideally for best RT performance you're at least looking for 4070.
Are these cards for 1440p? 30 fps?
No, they are 1080p cards. But a lot of people want to see how much head space there is, regarding to how long it will provide them with a decent performance.
Absolutely, you watched the video right? Both were able to put out more than 60fps in most of the games, apart from couple of poorly optimized games such as scamfield, AW2 etc. And this is with ultra, if you turn settings down by notch or fiddle a bit then you're gonna get more fps, most probably looking at 80+ fps, moreover you know there's no visual upgrade using ultra vs high (as demonstarted in a DF video) settings.
Amd RTX = fail
Definitely not 1440p cards. Recently bought the 7900 GRE for a new build and was thinking about using it for 1080p because of shitty games perform these days.
7600 xt >>>>>>>
when trash met garbage
Of course, Radeon is far better than NVIDIA with prices and performances
Hold my dlss, dlaa, dldsr, Nvidia broadcast, driver stability, raytracing performance, encoding performance, Nvidia reflex, video super resolution upscaling, the new hdr tool
@@saulnotgoodman550most of that is available in Radeon as well with different name 😂
@@saulnotgoodman550Hold my $100 that I saved for going red and 3 Big Macs too.
конечно, амд шлак
less power
Every game is smoother on AMD. Look at the frame time graph
Wow didn't noticed it. I find this better than a bit more fps
@@Ravecat27 Exactly
I don't think so... Wich is the video have you watched?? Frame time of 4060ti is always bettere guys, please
But bot cards are peace pf crap for value
Lol no it's not you clown.
No AMD have bad 0.1% and 1% especial in E sports games like Fortnite and pubg and cs2
AMD win
There is no need to get 16GB RTX 4060 Ti. The 8GB variant is far cheaper and frame generation will get you to those high stable frame rates
Did you watch the video? Besides Starfield all of the 2023 games used more than 8GB, frame gen would add even more memory usage.
No. Just what lharsay has said.
Frame generation itself sometimes use 1 gb vram and 8GB is not enough for 1440p
When you turn on ray tracing and frame generation, the amount of RAM exceeds 8 GB even at 1080p resolution.
Alan wake 2 que usa novas tecnologias discorda do seu comentario. O futuro para jogos pesados com novas tecnologias vai exigir muito das placas e 8 GB ja esta fracassando. Agora se for para cod, fifa, minecraft etc ai ok
Both cards are trash 😂 rx 6700xt goat
The RTX 4060 TI 16gb is better. Just it's price the issue.
No DLSS test = dislike
huh. DLSS can only be used by one of the cards in this comparison.
Both are trash ,
AMD always loses, no wonder that nobody beats against nvidia for its performance and efficiecy...
Also Every Nvidia Card are good for 1080p
AMD always looses..... Meanwhile 7900XTX beats 4080, 7900Xt beats 4070ti and 7800xt beats 4070. And all that while also being cheaper.
The only advantage Nvida has is Raytracing performance, but that comes at a price while 99,9% of all games doesn't even have Raytracing.
@@walther2492 OpenGL are very well optimized on nvidia, so in terms of Emulators like 3ds, switch beats AMD to be honest.
@@AntiGrieferGames You are right, but how many people make real use of that? 1% to 3%? And what about Vulcan, where AMD is far better optimized? It's an argument, for sure, but unfortunately not a good one.
@@walther2492 Also, he didnt considered that Wii and Switch emulators are really light and almost every GPU can run that without a issue
@@walther2492 How in the hell it’s better when the 4090 kicks all amd cards ass wtf😂😂you can’t be better if you cannot beat the king of the card the 4090. Let’s be honest they said the 7900 xtx will beat the 4090 until they realize it couldn’t compete they started comparing it too the 4080. Explain that? The 4080 super is on the way tho and it’s going to smack the xt & xtx
Why do AMD fans bring the argument of energy efficiency only in the case of processors? 😇
Take that all you AMD fanboys
KKKK aí aí, esqueceu das outras rx...
Said the Nvidia fanboy🤦
Another BOMB from AMD!
I dont know what you’re talking about lol. Both are same price and both are same performance and both are shit. Everything the same.
Since everything is the same, do you prefer to buy which of the two cards??@@Soimy
@@MockingCat technically i like the 4060 ti more cause of dlss and ray tracing but its not like its running ray tracing anyway and you can just get the fsr 3 mod in most games now. But I still think both are shit
Right! So if you yourself are saying that you would buy the RTX 4060 TI then you are contradicting yourself in relation to your first statement! Have a good time...@@Soimy
@@MockingCat I didn’t say I would buy it lol. I said if I had to that I would rather have the 4060 ti. But I actually have a 7800 xt which is probably way better than your card lmao. And i dont know why you’re trying to make beef because i think that the 4060 ti is shit lol. Go check any review. They all say it’s shit.
Возьмите 4060ти. Больше ФПС, ниже тдп. Отобьете на плате за электричество.😊
Ммм, отобъется за 50 000 часов :D
@@rsh2099от балды прикинул тут: если взять дефолтного работягу, который стабильно играет 3 часа каждый день на карте от зеленых, которая в нагрузке примерно на 50Вт экономичнее карты от красных, то в год мы имеем примерно 1113 часов наигрыша и приблизительно 54 кВт сэкономленной электроэнергии, что в денежном эквиваленте при среднероссийских 5р/кВт равняется экономии 273 рублей в год. Да, у западных товарищей 1 кВт электроэнергии значительно дороже, но и зарплаты пропорционально выше, в итоге получается примерно та же самая разница в соотношении.
Хотелось бы немного пояснить за 2 момента:
1) в расчет бралось то, что человек будет играть КАЖДЫЙ день по 3 часа, далеко не все наиграют столько часов за год, но и есть люди, кто наиграет больше
2) примерная разница в 50 Вт между картами только в самых тяжелых играх, в более старых или менее требовательных к железу совершенно необязательно, что карта будет загружена на все 100%, и тогда потребление сократится, как и разница в пиковой мощности между картами.
@@MakeYourVision Не у каждого есть мощный блок питания. Мне просто не хочется 8 тыщ за новый блок питания отдавать...Так бы купил 3080 на авито за 40к.Эх..
@@andrewkalapan9117 вы увидели и смогли ответить на мой коммент? А то я сейчас открываю уведомления, вижу ваш ответ, перехожу по ссылке - нет моего коммента, будто удален. Открываю в пк версии - тоже самое, пустота, только ваш ответ в никуда.
Second😎😎😎
Include PUBG pls
9000mhz from the 4060 ti is mad , 7600 xt is only 2200mhz ("mem")