SF Castro District merchants protest in frustration of unhoused encampment
Vložit
- čas přidán 14. 08. 2024
- Merchants and residents from one San Francisco neighborhood gathered on Wednesday to protest against a group of unhoused people who refuse to move. This took place in the Castro District.
abc7ne.ws/3rwNGO5
#unhoused #homeless #encampment #sanfrancisco #businesses
So the judge who blocked the city homeless sweep order did not live in the city and she lives in a place where homeless is illegal... What a twist!
Time for the vanlords to set up housing in her neighborhood. And get the advocate ready to sue Albany.
Doesn't matter. Our old local Federal judge did the same thing, Carter. He got moved to LA so our county is doing better. We still have camps but not like we use too.
Just a question, where would they go?
@@michaeljones1802 That's not my problem, that's their problem and that's why I pay taxes! I got my parents who are houseless; my son who graduated a year ago and cannot find a job; I adopted a puppy last month from a kill shelter and I am recovering from cancer. Their problems are not mine. Do you actually help them or do you just complain?
Any thoughts judge us following the law? You’ll blame everybody but those actually allowing it.
The law has to change. One person’s right shouldn’t trample everyone else’s.
Precisely.
Once legislators (at the city and state level) ratify and pass new laws to redress this crisis, it’ll be a seismic paradigm shift.
Although there will be some attorney(s) trying to make a name for themselves, who decides to represent these “un-housed”, and who challenges the “new laws”, all the way to the United States Supreme Court.
The bums don't have a right. They have a bad far-left government on their side that coddles them.
They voted for these lawmakers. This is how they like it.
Same logic should be applied to 2nd Amendment as well
Most of them voted for it
Im so sick of entitled people
@@eqsaelis that English?
@@eqsaelyou’re a fake Latino libtard, go away. You’re ruining the cultura and a disgrace to real brown people
How is being homeless being entitled?
They aren't unhoused. They are homeless, They need to be forced to either work or vacate the city. And yes - I HAVE BEEN HOMELESS.
they're not homeless. they are drug addicts
I know, the attempt to manipulate the language e.g. "unhoused" is obvious and pathetic.
Not everyone is able bodied capable of working, doofus.
@@nursejoed They think we are as stupid as they are.
@@eqsaelUnhoused people aka nasty bums.
It’s unbelievable seriously!
Let me get this straight.
He lives on public property causing businesses lose money ,causing public health and safety danger problems ,taxpayers people can’t walk on sidewalks. He declined to go to shelter many times .
Judge doesn’t order to move him from street instead decided to pay him 9000$ (which is taxpayers money ) UNBELIEVABLE!!!!! .
San Francisco deserve better!!!! Clean street Better Leadership !!!
Democrats voted for this. Enjoy
He should've thanked them for throwing out his trash for free. He did not have $6000 worth of stuff or he would've been robbed already on the streets 😂
Business and homeowners should just start refusing to pay taxes, and sue, since those elected aren't doing their job to protect their freedom to do business and live and work in safety. Also for the loss of tourist dollars as the once beautiful SF is turned into a cesspool.
@@twilitetide How about they pay the people who work for them a living wage. Most homeless people work.
Keep voting Dem uniparty. 🤡🤡
Sue the city for not enforcing the laws !!
The city is run by democrats. They don't care, they want this to continue forever. Most businesses in the city of SF are gone for good and more are leaving
Sue the city for allowing housing to become so inaccessible…
It's now called San Fran-SH&Ts-co for a reason.
@@xx133 Nobody forced you to live there chat for brains.
Sue the USA for breaking all the Native American treaties and give back the stolen gold…how does that feel, descendant of a European colonists.
Our sacred turtle island was a great place until the Europeans came; women did all the work while men could go fishing, hunting and have extra wives…
SF is coming to an end with all this homelessness and crime and nobody does anything, we need to vote differently now
Too late. The democrats have their Dominion voting machines and illegal/dead voting schemes locked. Wouldn’t matter if 75% voted against (D). It’s over for CA, unless some revolution takes place
L. M. F. A. O. It’s over you can’t fix this now.
The correct term is homeless, not "unhoused."
Bingo
Bums.
times changed, definitions change.
Bums…they are there by choice which the $9000 winner clearly states.
You’re both wrong. It’s bum.
As environmentally sensitive as San Francisco used to be it's a shame to see the judge allowing raw sewage to be dumped into the street drains designed for rain water along with wrappings and spoiled food, not to mention needles and other drug paraphernalia. It's not a "Constitutional right" to pollute the environment.
They are right, they try to hold the payment as long as possible
Its not a constitutional right to make San Francisco expensive af. Also not a constitutional right to storm the capitol on Jan. 6th
But the current roster of politicians don't see it the way you and everyone else from the rest of the country are seeing it. The current roster of politicians from the Governors office on down have an agenda in place and that is to tax everyone to death while providing zero services in return.....
But I‘m sure they’re doing their best to fight climate change.
@@advancetotabletop5328Are you one of those uneducated red state climate change deniers I keep hearing about? What's it like having a single digit IQ, inbred? 🤣
Blocking sidewalks that a wheelchair can't pass is a violation of the ADA Act. Lawsuits need to be started against any city that violates the law.
It is the people’s fault that San Francisco and Oakland ended up like this, too much communism in government
Lol you don't care about the homeless or people in wheelchairs.
You just don't want to see what the capitalist system you live under does to other people.
What if some of the people that are homeless are in wheelchairs too?
The homeless industrial complex is a bottomless pit. People are making very good salaries working within those various organizations that make up a Complex. Even former San Francisco mayor, Willie Brown said the ‘homeless’ aka vagrant problem is designed to never be fixed. As long as the same like-minded politicians are in charge the problem will only continue to get worse.
Indeed have to get rid of the uniparty
It's time to take off the gloves and break out the dirty tricks. You're fighting against a group of Lawless people.
you don't mean with pointed sticks and pulling a tonya harding on some folks
I think people are looking for FREE housing in San Francisco !
...and they'll get it with a twist 😁
Some of these people are choosing to live on the street, and these same people are scammers, live on the street, suing merchants and governments if their possessions are “loss”
They voted for it. They're receiving the fruits of their labor, well deserved I might add.
It’s so disgusting how they care more about homeless drug addicts than taxpayers
Even taxpayers won’t get free healthcare when they retire.
Just because someone is homeless does not mean they are drug addict
@@words.Of.Truth.the vast majority are I assure you my old friend from high school is homeless in LA addicted to crystal meth
I volunteered at an elementary school in the Castro and accompnied kindergartners from the school to the public library. Along the way we passed many homeless passed out on the sidewalks. The kids asked what they were doing. In the library, itself, there was a homeless man loitering in the restroom and a librarian had to accompney a kid into the restroom for his safety. It's very sad that San Francisco citizens have to tolerate this.
It's all up and down the west coast
Nope, they voted for it! And to subject their kids to it makes them that much more crazy!!
Mid am. 1968 glue sniffing, paint huffing rampant. We as elementry kids walked by dead addict. City , fams so apalled it ended quick. Not by molly cuddling, Prison, Jail, removed the cancer. Think of the jobs new prison building, Guards, transportation straight out of town. Unsustainable bussiness model.
You should learn how to spell before you try interacting with elementary school students again.
Don't be sad. They love it. Voters will elect the same politicians at the next election. Hooray for San Francisco Democrat progressives 🌈
Just proves that these bums are ungrateful and will never stop asking for more.
I don’t travel to SF no more because of drugs , crime and overall cost to do things in SF is too pricy for the headache. Sad I lived in Daly City and missed the location for sure. Miss it but I can do without
Vote them out and get the new council members in who can correct the issue.
And you know for sure that the new council CAN correct the issue ok and how would you like to see the issue corrected?? You don't know do you? Just leave it up to them
@@kRomani-gh4wsI know for sure that a democrat council won’t do anything. New DA, new council, naw mayor. Punish people who want to shoot up on the street.
Too late. It would have to be a 180 turn, and SF can't do it.
This is madness! Almost vomited when supervisor said: “I share their frustration “. Yeah, right..
I know, right? like he knows
While cashing that big pay check because of the poverty and homelessness
The merchants should sue the judge and the homeless advocates for the loss revenue.
You're not allowed to sue judges.
A lot of the voters of SF should be sued too.
Maybe sue the walstreet firms driving up costs. Imagine protesting to people who don't even have a place to live. As if they have ANY power to do anything.
Sick. Profits more important than people’s lives. We need affordable housing, not persecution of the homeless.
@@xx133 How can people with zero money, zero motivation to work, and zero prospects afford "affordable" housing? Do you propose it should all be free?
The government is to blame. The people must rise up and demand it stops.
And demand a city do what ?
I don’t see a solution to the problem in your statement !
The voters who keep electing these politicians are to blame and it’s doubtful things will change anytime soon.
@@Wooster77
blaming politicians doesn’t sound like a solution
In your opinion, how do you solve all the problems of the unhouse
Possibility of mental issues , dependency on drugs, not being employed, and having a source of income
@@jackskellington9195 cant blame them? they are the ones who made the dam 1k steal law or less rule lol. not related to this news but still. they have a lot of problems lol
Rise up? What do you mean?? Stand in the middle street, hold up traffic and protest?? We all see how that goes.
What is “rise up” ????
Nobody asks how these Castro District merchants voted.
You can tell they are hardcore 🐘🐘🐘🐘 Trump lovers they're naturalized Americans probably from India and Pakistan and you know what brought them here?? No sorry not a better life GREED $$$$$$
Like voting either way actually makes a difference
@@butterbagboy , we don't have these issues in Texas, until you go to a blue City. Yes, voting matters. So, wash the blue out of your hair, pull up your pants, get a job, and vote for a republican that is actually a republican. Not the Romney/Bush types. Those are Globalist scumbags.
@@butterbagboy of course it does. The elected mayor, city council, district attorney are the ones who are empowered to make social policy, that’s how it works. The police chief does nothing because they are appointed by these elected officials and beholden to them.
@@butterbagboy Says the Democrat.
Come on, you can say it... Just try real hard... HOMELESS DRUGGIES. no need to try and sugarcoat it
Breed and the Board of Sups need to go. Lack of accountability and public safety. We are tired!
The root cause of the problem is the Federal law (the 2018 decision in Martin v. Boise) that allows homeless to camp anywhere on the street. Many cities including LA under different Federal Judges allow cites to move homeless camps once those cities have 60% homeless shelter capacity. However, the Federal Judge in charge of San Francisco required the city to have 100% homeless shelter capacity before any action is allowed. Did you watch the entire video? The reporter said the Federal Judge who put the SF homeless camp sweep on hold lives in Albany where homeless camp is illegal?
@@robtangent4664 The judge's name is Judge Magistrate Donna Ryu of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. She needs to be removed from office as soon as humanly possible.
stop characterizing it as a homeless encampment, there are avenues and help for homeless. THESE are street criminals living on Your sidewalk. NO ONE In their right mind would rent to these criminals. NO bills, means, more for drugs. This will not end well. When people are scared they do dangerous things.
This all is BS. The judge should have to live near this. But if you are offered housing or shelter and you turn it down then the city should remove all their stuff that is on public property. Can't believe that man got 9000$ and still is on the street BS. provide more mental health service
Each and everyone of the Homeless advocates should allow at least 5-10 homeless to live in their property or outside of it.
There shouldn't be advocates for homeless at all. I mean how is it humane to keep people living on the streets and not fight for mental illness facilities to reopen or rehab center to forcefully HOUSE these people for safety, health and humane conditions.
"Not in MY backyard though."
the government should say no our problem is getting bigger with homeless people let,s try help them slow slow instead he,s allowing people to enter illegal and help them instead
The social services has collapsed, failing the cities, that mean reductions in force and salary decreases….why do folks keep rewarding failure
@@harold.one.featherPeople aren't rewarding you
Do what the Castro merchant association stated, don’t pay taxes as a collective group.
... and the city will go after each and every one of them. After all, they've demonstrably have assets and some financial means. Just go and try it.
The homeless guy? Can't squeeze blood out of a potato.
Best sell the business while the getting is good, there is no making of profits anymore…
Business owners it’s time to leave!!!! It’s not going to get any better!
So sad!!
He isn't homelss.
It is pure gangster activity.
HOMELESS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! not unhoused! no one owes them a house!
AHHhHhhh
No. The correct term is vagrant. Or bum. Stop using the PC language so-called advocates created.
City gave him $9,000?!? No wonder he's not moving....keep suing the city and make $ that way. This homeless guy has more brains than any of the politicians
Like that little closing line that the judge resides in Albany where homeless encampments are illegal.
"And by the way, the federal judge who ordered that sweeps in SF be put on hold does NOT live in the city. Donna Ryu lives in the East Bay city of Albany WHERE HOMELESS CAMPS ARE ILLEGAL". !!!!!!!!!! So, she made sure to pick a place where homeless camps are illegal, but we have to deal with that....
There's no such thing as affordable housing if the only amount you're willing to pay is $0.00 per month.
And yeah, the city of Albany could NEVER . . .
They’re not “unhoused”. They’re homeless.
I thought there were laws against loitering but I guess not.
in many cities around the world, street encampment , street loitering are illegal
Names
Best go there and enjoy that…this is here and it is the community’s fault it got out of hand, keep paying those extreme salaries to ineffective politicians
If the homeless are offered shelter and refuse then the city should legally and forcibly allowed to remove any and all encampments.
and ban them from the state. ship em outta here
And then what? Do you honestly think that's gonna stop the homeless? They will be back again and again.
@@superrunnerx1 if you cross back in directly to prison.
Storing their belongings lol for free???
@@thecapricorn11you're still paying for their living 😂
Wait FULLY GROWN ADULTS are expecting SOMEONE ELSE to provide them with a place to live??!! On top of that when help is offered IT'S BEING REFUSED! A person should have ABSOLUTELY NO RIGHT to do that! You don't have the right to camp in front of someone's business, to hinder someone from making a living.
To relieve yourself on the sidewalk, to make a bed on the sidewalk where people have to walk and get to work!
ALL OF THAT SHOULD BE ILLEGAL and THEY SHOULD BE ARRESTED! You do that and there's a place they can put you it's called JAIL!
Merchants still attempting to run a business in SFO are getting what they should have expected. Should have closed up shop and left years ago; good news they still can.
At some point you have to come to the realization that things are getting worse, will continue to get worse, and must get much worse before something effective will be done by local government...by then, if it happens it's likely too late.
Leave. Now.
Land grab is illegal.
The people that came up with the term "unhoused" are the same people pocketing millions to continue this blight on your state.
we could shorten it to "Bums"
@@markbajek2541I'm 43. They have always just been called homeless. Unhoused makes it sound like some opposing force came in and pushed them out onto the streets.
*BOOM*
@@herzfeldji I'm a bit older than you and back in the 60's it was still shameful to be a dead beat, now you're seen as a chump if you aren't milking the system somehow.
@@herzfeldjiFully agreed, and the term “unhoused” also gets linked to the advocacy groups’ ridiculous argument that these bums should be offered free housing, and not shelter.
By that token, I can be from anywhere, and as long as I squat in SF long enough, I can request free housing!!
Unhoused? what is Uhoused? Keep changing the problem with different name will not make the problem go away. Facing it and resolving the root of the problems will, such as simply enforce the law, more police, and more rehab facility, etc.
He received $9,000.00 from the city because they threw his stuff away. Wow. That’s so wrong. He should pay a fine for living on public property.
But that is $9000 that will straightaway go into the coffers of booze and drug dealers in SF. Party on, Garth!
He's on public property so they're within their rights. Like it or not, that's how it is on the books.
The law is broken, became broken the moment the government started stealing land from Native Americans while giving them booze to silence the 10,000,000 Native Americans in the 300 concentration camps affectionately known as Reservations
The store owners all need to pay all the homeless people to move their encampment over to the property of city officials-either in front of government buildings or officials’ residences.
That’s the best idea yet…put up homeless tents in front of the politicians homes…how many of the politicians actually walk through the homeless camps, none because they fear the homeless people…
No, they should pay a few large individuals with baseball bats to take care of the situation.
You People Voted for this. You People have castigated others that spoke out against this Aggressive Homeless behavior. You People wanted this.
"I have seen things I never want to see again ... BBQ pits on the sidewalk." ... 🤣 NOW THAT DESERVES AN OSCAR FOR PERFORMANCE!
These encampments make it hard for disabled people to use sidewalks as well
The federal judge needs to be fired!!
How do the ‘unhoused’ people afford a lawyer? Put that effort into getting a job. I’m sure a lot of businesses would rather see them as possible employees instead.
Recall Mayor Breed and the entire city council!
Homeless people are trespassing and should be arrested for doing so.
Yes arrest them all by the thousands 🐘🐘💊💊 hahaha hahaha hahaha 💊 then what?? Fine them thousands of $$$? Put them on probation?? Hahaha 🤣 💊 jail them ?? See the headline thousands of homeless arrested yesterday no room in the jails so they put them in encampments not enough guards or doctors no food oh no what are we going to do?? Hahaha 🤣 hahaha 💊💊💊☮️❤️
Many thanks for the local ABC affiliate for reporting on this. I cannot understand how SF residents continue to vote for “we’re looking into it” do nothing politicians
How about moving them in front of the supervisors homes and Pacific Heights?
That's hilarious that a homeless person was able to sue the city and get restitution. Meanwhile hundreds have damaged their cars from the potholes that the city never fix never get compensated😂
Only a fool drives right over a pothole....' Gee, there's a big pothole, I better aim my front tires right into the heart of it, after I speed up!! '.
I think there needs to be a broken water line on to the sidewalks…
They should go protest in front of that judge's home and shame her for her decision.
Look at what these "unhoused" are doing to our environment. Garbage, drugs and waste going into our water supply. We continue to support bad behavior and are shocked when tax paying citizens are sick of it.
So the judge said the sweeps of homeless camps had to stop lives in a community where homeless camps are illegal. I think that's what you call irony.
If they are offered place to stay, and they prefer to stay in street. Then they have to been removed. Period. They are basically a grown up sprat who needs to be enforced.
We are hurting them more by allowing them to fall into drug use and a diseased state in front of everyone trying to run a safe business.
REAP what YOU SOW, San Fran. Reap it!!!
Why isn’t Mayor Breed dealing with these issues instead of giving poorly crafted excuses? Her administration is one of the worst SF has had.
What if the city just donates the sidewalks to the businesses and the business can put signs on no loitering, no trespassing, no encampments on now business owned sidewalks? The business can advertise on the side walks, put up fences with gates and entry, doors, or whatever. It can eliminate these tents to pile up at their front door. A business pays a lot of taxes and should be respected. this helps get rid of the people living on the streets and make them go into affordable housing? Those people say they have rights yet they do not pay taxes, work, clean nothing but always destroying property, devalue Realestate to nothing and devour cities into ghost towns. Yet the business pays taxes and contributes to the tax base not the homeless getting free everything on the streets. Of businesses close down then they might loose a lot of free services. The business taxes is the biggest contributor in Federal and State level taxes. The business owners should have way more rights in this country!
That's actually a half-way good idea. Not the gate part. But making the attached sidewalk part of a business's property causes the bums obstructing them to no longer be camped on "public" land and hence trespassers. But like I said before, California has no respect for small business people. It will never happen.
Anyone left in San Francisco that still have a conscience , stop paying taxes. Stand up for your right to live in a decent city
Stop electing the people responsible for this.
Yeah have fun in jail. They have no problem arresting and jailing people who actually contribute to society. Look at all the people I'm RVs that aren't paid registration in decades and are illegally parked yet once we park for over 30 min in a 2 hour spot we get a ticket or towed.
@@meatpopsicle1567 But they like it.
@@meatpopsicle1567🎯
It's the residents fault for voting for the politicians the policies that govern the city. SF is the bluest city in the state right, so why are their a bunch of homeless, drug addicts, and crime? Must be the people you vote in and bill you pass. lol.
🤣. Problem is not the drugs and housing affordability....... It's the ADVOCATES for these homeless. Everytime they open their squawk box, everything stops, nothing gets accomplished.
And someone pays them to be advocates, ending those tax deductions and tax havens would go far in helping the homeless and help the community restore its pride and work ethic
I feel bad for the people who are living in the encampments, but I think enough is enough. Especially for someone who has turned down assistance. I understand and agree more affordable housing is needed, but I also think no matter how affordable it would get, that Toro just wants free housing and would rather live on the streets than have to follow any given rules.
And you could be right on his individual case but that doesn't mean that's correct about everybody
"The unhoused" and "the homeless community" are phrases whose goal is the normalization of homelessness. Similarly, "chemical substance" is a phrase whose goal is the normalization of "recreational" drug use. Homelessness is closely connected to drug addiction. "Recreational" drug use damages health. Drug addicition could end in a deadly overdose. The drugs aren't used to treat an active problem, such as a type of physical pain. They're used to "get high." So, they damage health. Drugs exist to treat problems. As a result, why are Leftists attempting to normalize drug addiction and homelessness? They suffer from an inferiority complex. They're unable to be objective. They're unable to dichotomously classify. They can't accept that existence is superior to non-existence. So, they can't accept that there are superior actions and inferior actions. In Leftism, "equality" refers to sameness, the movement to produce such a reality being inferiorization, in which the dichotomy of superiority and inferiority doesn't exist, in the sense that less superiority exists, implying that inferiority is higher. The majority of Leftists are helpelessly subjective. When they go down the wrong path, they're defensive. Leftism is a downward spiral. Making the world a more inferior place, and being defensive, which makes the world an even more inferior place. Hence, they live in vengeance.
So why is it that an east bay city can enact laws to make encampments illegal while SF practically paid this guy ($9,000) to continue to live on the streets.
Because the legal system is a bunch if pomp and circumstances you are kept deliberately ignorant of(until its your turn to be pushed into the meat grinder).
If rabble like you knew how the law actually functioned. You would burn down every courthouse.
@@daggers101 It literally did. In service to Purdue Pharma. They launched a literal opium war on your nations and killed millions of dullards just like you.
Protest or not. It will be like this forever.
Let’s ask all the merchants to close their stores and leave the city. Like many other stores have done, close them all down. Problem solved. Only the homeless left.
😀 "Downtown San Francisco has become so dangerous, that many residents are now searching for a new place to defecate." -- Greg Gutfeld
How was it ever legal to camp in a city on a sidewalk?
Camp or to go to bathroom on street .
Maybe1.... might have started with Occupy Wall Street (2011). A few homeless encampments kept stubbornly returning (even after OccupyWS) and the homeless issues, snowballed. Big-city governments were once, more responsible toward citizens, but this also changed drastically in the last 10-15 years.
We need to stop identify them by being "unhoused" and rather indicate the more important point that they are heavy drug users.
And extortionists
Huh?????
All of them? And you know this, how?
@@philipdefrancisco7540 Thank you for your concern. We have filed it away.
Go after the drug dealers and the ones who can't stop them voting for one or the other is useless you want all this to stop?? Vote for martial and military laws national guard all over build prisons after prison or in your vision if I'm correct shoot them all welcome to Iran
That bum got $9000 for leaving trash all over the sidewalk? He committed a crime and he got a payout? He rejected public housing that’s his choice
so a judge lives comfortably in an area where homeless encampments are NOT legal and yet rules otherwise for the city of SF. perfect irony there!
They'll do anything to fix it... except change the way they vote.
Crazy how the city doesn’t side with the taxpayers 😂😂 unbelievable
Every week California comes up with a new and better sounding words for their terrible problems.
These encampments are a 'Health and Safety" issue because often times they have rampant drug use, human waste discharge and enormous amounts of trash within them. Those that want to be the "champion" for these encampments and proclaim this a civil rights issue, when it is not, would call the police if these encampments were on the sidewalk in front of their houses, to get them out.
If the storeowners want change, stop requesting the city to do something and put down the useless signs. What would work is taking the city to court for creating a public nuisance. I would be in court every week until they did something. That homeless guy knows how the system works.
The bureaucracy need homelessness for the profits it generates…Alameda County Community Food Bank receives $124,461,736 in total support and revenue, there is no incentive to do anything
Need a law that bans sleeping on the street. Kind of like parking tickets. Need to find out how these people are getting the money to buy drugs. If they are on disability, cut of the money flow. Then these people can not stay high on the governments dime.
The "helping the homeless" lobby is very strong. They make money trying to help the 'unhoused'. If they succeeded, the money tree might die.
So many people would die if we did that.
Good reporting - thanks guys
People used to brag about living in SF.And California in general. Now the middle class are looking to get out.
Reminds me of homeowners who can’t legally get rid of squatters that don’t pay rent
Its a sad moment when you realize the homeless have more rights than the tax payers.
A sad moment when you dont realize these voters are ok with it.
The sad moment is conservatives complaining about San Francisco. When was San Francisco ever clean? Dirty Harry or Michael Stone 'Streets of San Francisco' couldn't even clean up San Francisco .
No they don't...
It’s a sad moment when you fail to realize that the homeless also pay taxes.
@@xx133 they dont pay property taxes.
Time and time again, residents of affluent neighborhoods vote against affordable housing to preserve the legacy of said neighborhood. Looks like the people who voted to keep San Francisco the same have unintentionally created a monster.
And if their business goes in the red, they get a tax deduction…and a fat tax refund
S.F. citizens needs a change in leadership, if you can call it leadership!
How about moving the homeless encampments to the side walk of those city council house and see what they do
As long as the people that are supposed to help with this situation are being paid hundreds of thousands a year, they’ll never have an incentive to fix it
I know. I say give ALL that money to motel owners who house these people. Motel owners can enforce whatever rules they want like any other apartment complex. Lets make the motel owners filthy rich so there is an incentive. They will be the heroes of ca.
Tax payers are getting scammed right and left especially with those homeless advocates.
That is how being landlord works yes.
The city officials are completely inept.
If the residents don't wake up and put real pressure on the mayor and other city officials, SF WILL become one big Tenderloin. It is inevitable as downtown deteriorates other parts of the city will follow the same fate. It is up to the residents to fight the corruption going on in SF
San Francisco will likely never return to what it once was. The entire west coast of the United States, from Seattle to San Diego, is clueless as far as how to solve the "residentially challenged" problem.
Poor baby....you need your blankie to cry into?
@@boofert.washington2499 - the west coast is where liberalism has come to die. And I say that as a person who is definitely left-of-center.
@@greyhoundude6112 At this point I just want solutions. Left. Right. Center. I want reason and logic, not dumb, catchy slogans. "De-fund The Police" was the worst. The problem with the so-called "Left" has ALWAYS been that they latch onto some absurd, experimental, airy-fairy "solution" until the effects of their "noble experiment" become unbearable (at the tax-payers' expense of course). The notion that anyone will ever be able to build new, free housing for every person wanting to live in California (or anywhere else for that matter) without totally devastating the environment and bankrupting the state in a crooked capitalist society is utterly absurd. And the vast number of those living in tents on our sidewalks obviously don't want housing, even if it's free. Unless the politicians are total morons they all know this. But their giant egos will not allow them to just say, "You know what?...I admit I was wrong. We should try something else."
They aren't clueless. They DON'T want to solve it.
@@ww2remembered983 You will be needing one soon stooge.
We have to ask ourselves who voted for the current politicians who are turning the city into what it is today. It’s us.. It’s us…
It’s the people who are complaining. Ironic
@@DingDangg ...pretty much
Are you sure the voting is legitimate?
These complainers would re-elect the same politicians back into power….😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@DingDangg Don't think these people for them though
the guy in $100 ray-bans with a nice hair cut that already sued the city and was awarded $ for throwing away his stuff says he wants affordable housing........... This short video explains a lot of what is wrong with our society right now!
"unhoused" as if the euphemisms make it any better.
This made my dayyy AHAHAHHAAHHA
NO REFUNDS YOU GET WHAT YOU VOTED FOR 🤣🤣🤣
The ones complaining are the ones that voted these garbage do nothing politicians in the first place
You get what you vote for!
The city already moved his camp once and he sued them for $9000 and won.
California is a total loss
Yep and it’s so fun to watch. I still laugh at that commercial they made about visiting California with all the famous people in it. They made it look like a paradise 😂😂
California is a pretty big state. This stuff happens in giant cities where it's warmer year-round. The rural areas of California are nothing like this.
@@SicTr4nsit total loss!
@@SicTr4nsit it’s a big state yes, and it’s entirely ran by people who have ran the big cities into the ground. Their ideologies will continue to SPREAD like cancer to the rest of the cities trust me. The good people move to Texas and the illegals and criminals will flock to the good cities that are left and ruin them too. It happens everywhere
@@matthewmorton7386 😂 whatever you say, bud.