CIVIL WAR Movie Review **SPOILER ALERT**
Vložit
- čas přidán 8. 04. 2024
- Gay homosexuals Nick and Joseph spoil Civil War - a 2024 dystopian action film written and directed by Alex Garland.
Premise: A journey across a dystopian future America, following a team of military-embedded journalists as they race against time to reach DC before rebel factions descend upon the White House.
Want to send them stuff?
Fish Jelly
PO Box 461752
Los Angeles, CA 90046
Follow us on Patreon: / fishjellyfilmreviews
Find merch here: fishjellyfilmreviews.myspread...
Venmo @fishjelly
Visit their website at www.fishjellyfilms.com
Find their podcast at the following:
Anchor: anchor.fm/fish-jelly
Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/388hcJA...
Apple Podcasts: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
Find them on Instagram:
Nick (@ragingbells)
Joseph (@joroyolo)
Fish Jelly (@fishjellyfilms)
Find them on Letterboxd:
letterboxd.com/ragingbells/
letterboxd.com/joroyolo/
Nick and Joseph are both Tomatometer-approved critics at Rotten Tomatoes:
www.rottentomatoes.com/critic...
www.rottentomatoes.com/critic...
Cast:
Kirsten Dunst as Lee Smith
Wagner Moura as Joel
Cailee Spaeny as Jessie
Stephen McKinley Henderson as Sammy
Sonoya Mizuno as Anya
Nick Offerman as the President of the United States
Jefferson White as Dave
Juani Feliz as Joy Butler
Nelson Lee as Tony
Edmund Donovan as Eddie
Karl Glusman as a spotter
Jin Ha as a sniper
Jojo T. Gibbs as WF White House Sergeant
Jesse Plemons as an unnamed soldier
Jess Matney as a checkpoint soldier
Cinematography by Rob Hardy
Edited by Jake Roberts
Music by Ben Salisbury and Geoff Barrow
Keywords: ending explained, reaction video, trailer, A24, SXSW - Zábava
We always call
Jesse Plemmons discount Matt Damon 😂. We absolutely love him ❤
As do my friends. He was great in breaking bad.
@@sebastianbillings7807first time we ever saw him was breaking bad he’s done well
Ever since he was in Breaking Bad, We call him "Meth Damon" 😂
@@YungNic 😂
Jesse is a very good actor. As good as or even better than Matt Damon.
Joseph’s face during Nick’s pull quote took me out 🤣
He was definitely over it.😂
I think Wagner Moura is supposed to be like a Vice journalist
Funny how it’s coming out on April 12. The same day the ACTUAL civil war started😅
I saw it on the 11th
@@Syzygy77wow, you’re cool
We're being spoiled with these 2 reviews tonight. I have my tickets for Thursday. Great director, and it's always a pleasure seeing Kirsten & Jesse on screen together. Thank you.
This movie reminds me of Apocalypse Now where one man is sent to kill another man that has done something vaguely bad. The journey takes place in a vague description of the Vietnam War while the main character briefly meets stereotypes along the way.
You cupcakes are the best movie reviewers on CZcams. I’ve said it for years now. always early and with all the details yall kill it every single time. Thank yall
“Oop wig, hi wig” had me in tears 🤣😂 great review as always. I was wondering if I wanted to give this film a watch, now I’m sold ! ☺️
Saw it in IMAX too, as someone who has plenty of friends in the military and secret service and live in the area . That DC battle segment was a little hard to watch lol
Also Jesse got TWO ppl killed for her foolishness . Hated her lol
I hate I missed it in IMAX. Saw it in Dolby and it sounded amazing
@@macnero4932dang! I mean I’m sure the sounds were even better
Yes. Jesse was an annoying liability. Wouldn’t follow directions, and kept getting various colleagues killed.
What was hard to watch exactly?
One of these guys barely paid attention to this movie, he knows no names. So...why are you making a review?
"Green behind the ears" LOL
Im so glad you do full spoiler reviews.
It almost sounds like the same type scenario of 28 Days later, road trip to an unknown awaiting fate.
And Alex Garland also wrote that movie… it is absolutely a recycled script
@@Blackarachnia1996 Did actually see it yet or did you just come to that conclusion because both movies involve people traveling?? Many movies involve people on road trips that doesn't make them a direct copy of each other.
Apocalypse Now
Bushwick has a similar premise, but the plot makes absolutely no sense.
@@joshadcock1035 it's the Golden fleece genre from 'Save the Cat.' aka the road movie. There are only like 10 different genres, so if you wanted to get super generalized then yeah they are the same kind of movie. Maybe the original poster meant like the way it feels? Semi candid? Almost over the shoulder or found footage style
THAT DAMN BLACKBERRY WIG 💀
It seems like the movie is trying to say that regardless of the politics of either side, that the journalists representing legacy mainstream media can be trusted no matter what. We all know that that isn't true.
Just saw this movie and not sure if loved is the right word, but haven’t been as moved and tense in a movie for this long ever. I felt as anxious as I did during the firecracker scene in Boogie Nights for nearly the entire length of Civil War. I do like that they didn’t get into a right or wrong debate over what started the Civil War. As I think one of you mentioned I thought the point of the movie was how horrible and terrifying war could be if it happened here.
I’m part of a generation that never was drafted into a war and while movies like Saving Private Ryan or Platoon can demonstrate the horrors of war, I felt like seeing this happen within our own country and scenes of US civilians taking each others lives was horrific enough.
The audio and use of gunfire and explosions mixed with silence almost made me leave the theater as it was that intense for me. I’m concerned anyone with PTSD will have a difficult time watching and experiencing this movie in a theater, more due to the soundtrack than the visuals.
A good movie but not one I think I could see again in the theater.
Always love your reviews!!
Yeah,the attack on D.C. was hard to watch. Showed Americans killing Americans, and a few years before this Civil War they would probably hang out with each other, work together, or each lunch together. Crazy
It’s always lovely to listen to you guys review films you enjoy.
Thank you Joseph for not making me feel alone! I saw this with three friends and they all loved it, but i couldn't get past the corny dialogue, and the character development didn't make sense at all. The young woman and stoner journalist have full blown panic attacks and are puking on themselves while Kirsten continues to hold it down and then out of nowhere the roles reverse at the last moment at the end. So bizarre. Was looking forward to this too and was sadly disappointed.
I feel the same way
“Hi Wig!” I love Joseph 😂
ive paid some attention to alex garland's films over the years and i think especially his series 'devs' is an interesting cultural critique of the tech industry, especially as someone living in the bay area. with that kind of precedent i do think garland has the capacity to do something interesting with this concept, if it were to be some kind of sociopolitical morality tale about increasing militarization inside of the US - which isn't a topic really breached at all in popular culture. i do have some doubts that it will fulfill that goal, especially with how much folks are saying it avoids alienating the audience, which i feel like is almost inherent if we are talking explicitly about these issues. thank u for your take!!
"Hi wig" I love you Joseph! Nick Offerman is handsome and has a nice head of hair on his own!!
I am definitely looking forward to this one!
Oh true I think the Purge and Kingsman were more accurate predictions. No way would a fluorescent press vest be plot armor. The whole reason things got bad was bc people didn’t trust the press lmao. Who wrote this movie.
In reality, the press likely would be part of or at least supporting the regime much like they are now in real life. Kingsman is a cartoon, and all but the first two Purge movies are garbage.
I saw it because Garland did Ex Machina, the best science fiction movie of the 21st century, but I didnt like it. Cinematography excellent. But the characters seemed thin with no development. And as you said, what development there was seemed forced. I get what Garland was saying. This happening here would be terrible and the press is great, etc.. But I think this could have been more impactful actually based on a real event or a country experiencing this in real life. Most press movies usually are and I just think it lands better if based on a real setting. And I guess I agree with you the press message seems out of date, and it was not believable to me everyone would just all put them in some safety bubble in 2024..because press. And I also think I disagree with part of the message that it does not matter the context. I think war, while terrible, does depend on context as to whether it is justified. If one side is oppressing the other or being violent or invading others, then the only option is rolling over and taking it. Without telling us "who is right", or at least giving us info to come up with our own conclusions about who is right, we have no context. So it just did not land for me.
This story could have been better in a novel. The movie really painted this idea with broad strokes. Like, what are the other states doing? What was the tipping point that caused this mess?
You're gonna have to pay that IMAX ticket price money two more times for the prequel and sequel.
The point of the movie is not about what caused the war. It's about the horror's that come from war.
The way WF took over the White House, they didn’t seem any better.
I get being vague about the political causes of the war, but I think we needed to know a little more about the strategic progression of the war. Like, how were militias from Texas and Californian able to take on the entire U.S. military? Where are the submarines, aircraft carriers, nuclear weapons, fighter bombers and such? They could have briefly mentioned , perhaps, half of the U.S. military refused to fight for the President and joined the rebel factions. That would have made sense, and made Washington’s downfall seem plausible.
@@joshadcock1035 but then why not just use a real war and put fictional characters in it? If you are going to invent a made up war most people are going to want an explanation, even if the original reason for it gets lost in the violence..
He could have taken a note or two from the oscar winning documentary "20 Days of Mariupol" where a fair amount of urgency was finding wifi and internet to transmit their stories.
Honestly the movie reminded me a lot of the documentary because of how realistic the combat portions were
Just came out the theatre.
This movie was very tame for my taste. No deep plot, just a road trip of journalists driving through mildly harrowing American country. A few harrowing scenes but I wanted more. Capably made and audiovisually accurate to the accoutrements of warfare but I wanted to know MORE.
I'm glad you said it was good because I've now booked twice as I discovered Alex is doing a Q&A. Jesse is really versatile. That photo with his red sunglasses is iconic.
I’m a photographer so I enjoyed every moment they were taking photos.
What I didn’t like, no one tried to save the 2 main characters that died. No one tried to save their lives. They just left the guy in the backseat. They could have tried wrapping his wound. Do something.
Something I didn't notice until I watched a review was Joel had no recording equipment. Lee and Jessie were photo journalist. What was he doing the whole movie?
driving
I agree with all the points you two brought up. There are some very intense and anxiety inducing scenes, but is shown through the perspective of characters that I didn’t really care for.
Thanks, gentlemen. I will be seeing this. Also, I just wanted to say that I am a big fan of your podcast and channel.
It's probably pretty accurate that there would be multiple different factions with different priorities. It makes no sense that Texas and California would get along. State lines in general probably would not hold up in general. It might be more City by city or area by area. California in Chicago would still be in League with the original regime.
Chances are with a president like they described, at least a good chunk of the military and almost all veterans would likely join some kind of resistance instead of continuing at their own posts.
Joel came off more like a cameraman/operator 😂😂 they should’ve slapped a video camera in his hand and it would’ve made so much more sense. If he was the camera man and Stephen was the long time documentary journalist or something.
I love hearing yalls opinions on films yall are great 👍🏽 ❤
Does Lee actually die? She was wearing Kevlar and there was no blood that I could see.
One thing for sure, they didn’t check to see if she was still alive. They just continued on their quest to kill the president.
Loved the movie, especially when they dragged Trump screaming from behind the desk in the oval office.
Nick & Joseph…the sexiest review team on CZcams!!!❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Superficially, it seems neutral (to avoid alienating), but from *opinion alert*: my interpretation, if California and Texas were figureheads for the primary ideologies in the "culture war", while the President represents the United States, extremism from the ideologies are ironically united in the way they are both trying to shut down the other, including the tactics, which really leads to a tangential shutdown of the United States. The vagueness seems more reflective of the confusion created by the chaos--19:00. Considering the context, "not taking sides" is itself taking a stance. Edit: Yet it is important to not let that stance end up becoming complacency. Seems less like a warning and more a recounting of current events told through hyperbolic metaphor. And if it were metaphor, maybe the press represents artists.
Oooh I like where you're head is
Some critics say this movie is as good as Dune II.
No way! Dune was awesome.
The two films are completely dissimilar so a comparison is irrelevant.
cant watch this whole thing yet, avoiding spoilers... wondering: have u seen the twitter discourse about the supposed nazi in the credits?
First time watching one of your reviews. It was very enjoyable. Can't wait to see this movie.
I think it's funny when you can spot a wig but other's cannot and they think you are crazy lol well if you wear wigs, or style hair, or just use your eyeballs - you can spot a wig lol
I didn't like it at all, I found the basic story (press photographers who want to get inside the center of war) absolutely incomprehensible. I found the scenes in which they actually walk around with the warring groups with their press passes to be so far-fetched (especially at the end, anyone who thinks that this is how press photos are taken from war zones has lost their mind) that I was, based on the description (Sci-Fi), hoping for some kind of twist. Otherwise it was like a typical zombie movie/series, just driving from A to B. The characters and their dynamics have been seen before, only much better, so I couldn't really empathize with anyone. Worldbuilding was also non-existent.
Truly ridiculous....running around with their little cameras in the midst of thousands of bullets flying around embedded with all the shooters....shockingly bad movie....
What kind of an American would like this movie and what kind would hate it?
Anyone who watches this movie for the story is the kind of person who looks at a Jackson Pollock painting and says ‘I don’t get it’.
I agree with you. I liked it a little bit more than you but yes, compared to Alex Garland's other films with rich subtext this was a bit dry for me. For me, it was a movie with a powerful theme and quality Hollywood action execution, but it didn't live up to the hype.
I saw this movie today and haven't stopped thinking about it. Nick, your naming all the other "female photographer" actresses is like..... top tier content. Love you boys.
Spoilers :
So.. the sound design was great . The weapons :0
And some of the shots are beautiful, but I felt that it was too devoid of life. Too many empty streets and parking lots.
Did 3/4 of the population die off ? The cgi of the smoking blown out buildings needed more budget (I won’t blame the artists, but the limited budget)
The DC scene wasn’t convincing for me, tho still unsettling.. too small of a battle, too few extras- whereas , the more rural scenes were great, and probably more realistic/ snipers facing off in a tense scene. Great scene. The small gunbattle set between the two buildings was great. But I don’t buy the final White House scene. The president would already be gone somewhere in a bunker or etc
I will give the movie credit for delivering the unsettling feelings .. seeing the u.s. government falling.
Needed more info, more story
28 days later was a perfect zombie movie.
Ex Machina was very engaging.
Civil war had more potential than what was delivered.
FR when they entered the white house I was thinking to myself how the president would be half way across DC in the secret tunnel network
The t-shirt 😂❤❤❤
Spaeny is older than she looks, 25.
That's an adult, or it used to be.
They didn't need to do much aging down when she was playing Priscilla Presley.
This movie was HORRIBLE, the number one reason why is because....the entire plot was to get to DC to interview the President. At NOOOO POINT...does the movie or characters even acknowledge the President being willing to take their or anyones interview. Quite the opposite actually
My GOd,thank you for covering this movie for me. I’m not psychologically stable enough to see it myself…I take care of my mom, and she fell the other day, and I’m her caretaker so that was horrible. Additionally my Pops had prostrate cancer removed last month, and my brother is going through a divorce with 3 and 9 year old daughters, and I am recovering from a hospitalization for walking pneumonia. So thank you for the review again. ❤
❤️
GodBless
So sorry I know how that can be. I just lost my Mom after a 7 year battle with cancer and she had a bone marrow transplant in September which we thought would help to relieve her illness and pain but she passed on March 20. Her ups and downs falls and sicknesses will take us years to recover from. My heart goes out to you ❤
My heart is with you❤!
Saw this with 9 friends we all liked it but weren't big on the ending or how one character did not act their age at all. And we did wish it had a little bit more to say substance wise. But I enjoyed it more than Ex Machina.
Very scary. Just got out the theater.
I agree with you guys. Well crafted, for the most part. But the script didn't go far enough. Once you get over the aspect of it being American, it's business as usual IMHO. Because war is the same once it gets going. No matter the country. Even the part about family in Missouri choosing not to acknowledge it. That hit home, being a Missourian. And I think I'd probably feel the same. We're flyover country. It's their war... Until it's our doorstep type shit. But, this movie isn't bold. It's just well acted/shot/directed. Which is awesome. But it's tame. Presents no real questions. Doesn't even tell us why the war happens. And used Cali and Texas as the same. Which I can understand the, we're all Americans aspect to that. But, it fails in the end. And the final act action set piece was legit. But one of those Olympus Has Fallen movies did it just as well a few years ago. In the end, this felt like a black hole level dark comedy to me.
I just saw this film….it was ok…..I liked the ending military operation
Great review. It sounds like it would have been better served to have the journalist be from a different country.
I just saw it tonight. I would give it 2.5. It didn't give what it was supposed to give.
What were you looking for?
I wish one of the characters (maybe Jessie) had an internal monolog. They could have still stayed neutral but it would have felt more impactful
This movie sounds like an Amazon Prime movie. Big budget and just okay storyline 😶🌫️
My fave scene was Lee in the field which is a direct visual reference to Dunst’s Lux Lisbon in the Virgin Suicides
Is Jesse Plemmons that "Great Value" Matt Damon looking actor?
From the trailers I thought the younger girl was their daughter or something. 😂
This would have been much better as a franchise, starting from the very beginning
Can't agree. It being a short movie that gets it's point across succinctly is one of the reasons why it works so well.
@@Revealingstorm. Same not another dystopian series FFS.
I saw this film on IMAX too, the Chinese theater in LA to be exact. This film had my heart racing from start to finish. I’m not a war photojournalist but I took photos during the uprising in 2020 during the aftermath killings of George Floyd & Brianna Taylor and the response I got from people was jarring
Can you review A Clockwork Orange?
Visceral and tense. Wasn’t disappointed.
I really disliked the soundtrack. I hated the juxtaposition of the songs with the action scenes. For me the sound design of this movie is superb. You could really hear the gunshots and the gunshots felt heavy, as they are supposed to be. I think if the movie kept the only the score and only had the sounds of the gunshots and explosions, it would make us connect more to Kirsten Dunst's character breakdown at the end, since we would also feel beaten and assaulted by all of the gunshots from the movie. By adding those songs, for me, it took away from the weight that they could have had.
I saw this Thursday and enjoyed it. I was pissed at the young girl too. I must have shouted, sit your ass down several times in the theatre.
All about how these type of reporters are taking this as a calling not a job perhaps, a 'thankless job' too, unless someone else is continuing the work...*But* this one's in one's own backyard! From this review, the tone of 'not taking sides' is okay in dystopian plot, but, maybe more, 'palatable' 🤨with no major deaths, and order restored ending☺
I haven't seen this movie and don't intend to, so I'm okay with spoilers. I wish we could have got some backstory for the war in this movie, like why did the states secede and what was the tipping point that made open war breakout between the seceding states and loyalist ones. Also, does the movie explain at all what the other states are up to? The official map for the movie also shows the Florida Alliance and the New People's Army, but only the FA is shown in the trailers. Also, the president said in a short teaser that the FA failed which makes me think they don't influence the movie at all.
We also get no information about where the Air Force, navy, and Marines are, not to mention the drones, nukes, and ICBMs. All we see are foot soldiers with assault rifles, a few helicopters, and a couple of tanks.
@@karimbennett5651 There were the four F-22s that flew over the WF's base, but that's the only time we see any fixed-wing aircraft. Not sure about the lack of drones or USMC units, but I'm guessing the Navy wouldn't see much action beyond blockading costal states. As for the general lack of US military presence in the movie, my own personal theory is that they were bogged down in various war zones around the world which left the mainland only lightly defended (Similar to the opening for Red Dawn 2012) and DC fell before the bulk of the military could respond. I spent a few hours going over all the trailers, and there are a small number of support weapons such as an M240B, an M249, an AR pattern DMR, and a mortar, but apart from those, it's all basic M4s with standard barrels and furniture and all but a couple have EOTech sights. Would have been more realistic to see at least a few M16A4s for both sides and some more M4 variants in different configurations. Also the FA would probably also have several civilian weapons and older milsurps.
17:25 Nice nails soldier!!
😮💅
I personally loved it and hearing the directors thoughts I understand more why the conflict was vague. I appreciate that we were the war journalists, it’s not about why we got into it, we’re in it, it’s about surviving it
My brother and his friend went to see it and they hated it especially the ending of it.
What was awful about the ending???
@leoneltorres4442 I have no idea but I think it's because
Spoiler
The president got shot and the film ended.
I actually thought it was about the historic Civil War from April 12, 1861 - May 26, 1865 😏😏😏😏😏
What’s her name Priscilla Presley😂😂😂
Looking forward to this one ! I think the director said that he just wants to write now, not direct
Ok, so I skipped to the end to hear the rating, and I will come back to hear the rest after I've seen it. I actually want to be surprised for this one. I loved Ex Machina.
Loved it. A movie for photographers. 5 stars.
How about the part where Sammy is shot and they don't even try to stop the bleeding. They just let him bleed out and die in the back seat. This movie is laughably awful. There are a lot of ridiculous parts like that. I'm not sure why everyone thinks it's good. It has no story.
I hope Trumpers don't get any ideas with this movie, when Orange man loses again.
I'm wondering if you saw the movie. I got the opposite impression from this. The protagonists were for the insurrection... against Trump! It was promoting a civil war as a last resort means to keep someone out of office. The Trump stand-in gets killed and the movie celebrates it.
Lol u wish 😂 u gonna cope and seethe soon enough. Difference is even if you had tgose ideas xou would loose
tds
I'm finding out my comment was deleted, but the original comment has 45's name but it wasn't also deleted. I'm not understanding. Is his name being censored? Or only certain comments?
They're not this organized.
i did not enjoy this movie for several reasons. even the way it was captured; felt like a forced framing. the vagueness left to the emptiness.
Boring first half, awesome second half sounds like a great candidate for streaming movie pick
I understood the movie and its message and I was hooked the whole time into the story. And also don’t know what people were expecting from regular infantry men and women mixed in with civilian militias with varying levels of military experience fighting each other with an array of military weapons. The movie didn’t go into any details of actual war plans or tactics just general military objectives. The movie was trying to portray the fog and chaos of war through the narrow perspectives of journalists. This isn’t a Navy Seal or SOF movie. The director and actors weren’t focused on the military tactics. They were focused on the violence the fear the fog and the destruction of our humanity towards one another in a war torn America.
Kaley was the WORST. I will never see another movie with her in it.
I didn't like it
I love these dudes.
18:27-19:15 the ONLY interpretation of the movie that seems valid (and I've been binging reviews lol)
I hear it’s his last movie. He’s going back to being a novelist.
Oh no!! 😲 Where did you hear that?
He started strong and has been going downhill since.
i would love to see him write more, the beach is supposedly really good
He'll be back. Creative people never retire. They think they will when they don't have any immediate inspiration but as soon as it hits him again he'll be back at it.
4 films directed by Garland ? he should have a director credit for the 2012 Judge Dredd movie, he kicked the director out of the editing booth and took over the movie
Why would they put Nick Offerman in a bad wig? 😳 He has great hair.
Ngl I was hoping for something a little edgier but it still sounds worth the ticket.
Garland has some very interesting work. He creates a little ray of hope in his pessimistic worlds.
Edit: 😒 Was disappointed.
Fat Damon is great. He nailed the part.
I'm surprised nobody is talking about how hard it is to watch. It's somewhere between 'Come and See' and 'Tears of the Sun.'
That braziilan actor guy is so fine omg 🤤
I liked his other films. This was hot garbage.
The press being neutral has plenty of validity in an overseas leans but not in the US. Theres a whole things about how the CIA and military at large will never use Humanitarian Aid or the Press as cover ( under cover) to insure they stay a neutral life saving force. Harming journalist goes against the Geneva Convention.
This is why I think Garland should have made the main characters foreigners documenting the war as outsiders. I feel like everything in this film would have worked better if it had been done that way.
@@darkwingduck3477 Actually love this idea. Much more objective pov I think. But maybe he was worried about it reading as judgy. It could have created an outlook of the EU or UN reporters looking down on the mistakes the US made/making.
Thank you for the spoilers, personally i believe if a movie is good, it doesn't matter if youre spoiled. I needed to hear what scenes everyone is talking about, great video!
I was bored out of my mind. What was even going on? The civil war was a side note.
Ditto here.
Sorry you don't Like bold excellent films. This was dope 🤷🏽♂️💯
@@MikeBree There are plenty of excellent films (e.g., Before the Rain, Once Were Warriors). This one is not one of them.
Over your head.
@@carlrutherford1618sure
Best movie I've seen all year
It's like the movie bushwick
Dont waste your money. Wait it comes on Netflix unless you like war photography.
Nah, IMAX is fine 👌🏽💯
Thank you. I wish the trailer were more honest about what it was. I would have passed.
Don’t think this movie made the press look good at all, with the Brazilian being the worst. He gets aroused by the violence and only grieves when he thinks the war has come to an end. Kirsten has a redemptive arc, but her young colleague starts to lose her humanity.
I was surprised that offerman who is seemingly a trump stand in gets killed by insurrectionists. If the president is bad, this new military government and amoral press are depicted as even worse.
Great Movie worth the Money
It was triggering as someone who works in DC. It’s was heavyyyyy, but beautifully made. There were some parts that I wanted to leave the theater because it was so so so much.