Canon R6 Photography Review: It. Just. Works.
Vložit
- čas přidán 22. 10. 2020
- The Canon R6 is much like its bigger brother the R5 when it comes to performance, build quality, with the main difference being the 20MP sensor.
Unlike thousands of videos out on CZcams we decided to focus on the photography aspect of the camera. How good is the image quality, low light performance paired with the RF85 1.2 and the new 800mm F11 RF lens? We will let the results speak for themselves:)
To support us, you can get it on Amazon
amzn.to/34kEmyM
Editor - Bobby Tonelli
Camera/Producer - Kai Hong Soon
Video Editor - Sakeenah Sadiq
To know more about the Canon R6
sg.canon/en/consumer/eos-r6-b...
Check out Bobby Tonelli
/ btonelli
Follow us on
Facebook - / tech360tv
Instagram - / tech360.tv
Credits
Music - www.audiolibrary.com.co - Věda a technologie
Thank you for focusing on photography instead of video quality!
Thanks for watching
The R6 is so underrated. The low light performance is so good. The fact that it is 20 MP is a selling point for me. Big sensor sites equals great image quality.
Such a fun and informative video! I have been in LOVE with the RF 85mm1.2 for many months now. You didn't hurt that "affair" in my heart! One fine day...I will move up from my 6D to R6 and the 85 and smile a lot! Thanks for a helpful and upbeat video :)!! Excellent!
Thank you for watching
The R6 is on my shopping list for shooting live music. I’m currently using a 6D and 6D Mk2, and 20 Mp is plenty, especially for low light. Wish I could have had the 800mm in my surfing photography days. I used an 800mm f/8 with Kodachrome 64 and it was plenty fast enough so f/11 would be perfect with the R6.
Was waiting for this review..😀 this is perfect as an all rounder camera.
Thanks for watching. Yes it is ;)
Amazing review, I really enjoy your reviews
Much Appreciated
Love your videos. Thank you for your review. Brilliant.
Thanks George
Great job,thanks for reviewing for photography
I am looking forward to have this camera and lens combo in the future, the R6 and the 85mm 1.2 would be perfect. Currently im using Canon 450D with the 50mm f/1.8
Love to see photographic reviews of the R6!
Thank you!
Watching them reaffirms my purchase!
Love my R6 and your reviews mate
Thanks!
The R 6 has the sensor and the processor of the $6500. Dollar 1Dx mk III. The R6 has the ergonomics and controls also the IBIS and focusing system of the $3900. Dollar R5. I don’t have a problem with the price. I can make excellent 20 x 30 prints from 20 mp sensor. I’ve been making prints for 40 yrs. So to me this camera is a no brained for someone invested in the Canon system.
Yes it is. However with the competition out there I felt the price was a bit too high
I like how the shutter button on Canon cameras is pitched forward vs being square on the top of the camera body like other brands. Such a small detail makes holding and handling different in such a positive way.
Good observation
Canon ergonomics are great
Did you guys ever cover the 28-70mm f2? Can't seem to find it from your channel. Either way great video as always, keep at it!
Yep we covered on the RP review
Bobby, Booby the camera works It just works. Yas - your content - next level
Thanks Shauwn!
Great video - buying my R6 this week. The ONE thing which everyone seems to agree is that even if Canon bumped the R6 to 24 MP, it would have looked better in comparison to its competition. However, we have what we have. The fact that Z6 II doesnt have flip screen also may help some people steer away to R6.
Yes Nikon should have put that in
Great review and GREAT PHOTOS man! Appreciate the effort. Waiting on 85 f2 with r6!
Thanks! I wanted to try the 85 f2 but not available
"This takes great photo". That is what I wanted to hear about. I don't know why a lot of reviews just focus on video capability.
because this is CZcams. CZcams is a video platform so there are more people focused on that i believe
Count me among those dissing the new 600 and 800 of Canon when it first came out. I'm quite impressed with the shots you managed while shooting them handheld. They are definitely not lacking in detail. I'm not the biggest fan of the bokeh but, it's actually not bad given what you're paying for it. The key there, though, is the AF speed and accuracy of this combo. And looking at the eyes, it locks on well. How quickly does it grab focus in dim/low lighting? Would this be a good combo for the Singapore night safari? Or would that be too dark?
Yeah it grabs focus quickly. Night safari will be a bit of a challenge to be honest due to the aperture.
I just upgraded from my DLSR to the R6 a few days ago. How is the eye tracking for more than one subject/model? Have you had any issues with the tracking focusing and getting tack sharp images on more than one person/group at a time?
I agree with you on pricing . I think $3200 Canadian is too high imo, but unfortunately I’m not into waiting . I also wish it was a 30 megapixel sensor for cropping , even a 24 would have made me feel better about it at this price point .
I would like to do landscape photography and be able to print poster size prints , but the R5 is over 5K here, so that was a hard pill to swallow , plus I don’t care for the upper lcd and prefer the knob .
I’m hoping their next release of the R5 goes back to a knob and a 75 megapixel sensor , then I’ll justify the price for the R5 . One can always dream I guess
awesome review once again. I am a bit puzzled what we are getting for the extra $1500 over the eos R? Better tracking and better low light? Maybe better ergonomics? Or is it all about the video features?
Thanks for watching. You are getting quite a bit more.
Faster AF, better tracking, better Video Quality, image stabilisation, dual card slots.
@@TECH360TV
And have joystick!
It was lacking in EOSR
that low light picture with the 800 mm of the kid at 20.000 iso looks similar to a picture I take with my 6D at 800-1600 iso... this camera is amazing
Yes very impressive
I'm close to buying, yay or nay??? Mainly for photos but the amazing video quality I'm sure will come in handy eventually
If you love it get it. Nice camera
You're absolutely right about the price point. Whenever I think about adding a R6 body to my Canon kit to complement my R5, the first thought is always this: "I'm much better off buying a Z6II for below 3k dollars/almost a thousand dollar less without much stripping off(I have multiple systems for different type of work.) When you buy a R6 at almost 4 thousand dollar, you'll be reminded about things I hate about Canon. Stripped off so much stuff and price it higher so the early adopters are reaped off good by Canon. While that Z6II has most of the stuff just like a Z7II and even a bit extra. The Z lens s line 2.8 zooms are top notch, absolute performer in optical resolution, and treats CA magically to almost eliminating them. They just need the s sytem to complete so they can cater to more DSLR shooters to move over.
Agree about the Z6 and Z7II
sir i need your advice in buying cameras
we were looking to upgrade from mid range camera to full frame with in the budget for studio, wedding and other short videos...
even though we use shoot both photos and video mostly ,
a little higher preference for quality photos.
one of our senior suggested us to go for mirrorless in canon or sony both for video and photo shoot..
when i compared the difference inbetween 5D mark -iv, eos R and eos R5...
mainly i observed that the number of focus points varies from camera to camera...
where
eos R have 5655
focus points
5D mark -vi have 61
focus points
and
eos R5 have 1053 focus points
I dont know how far having more focus points plays key role irrespective of having 15 mega pixel lesser than eos R5
After watching your video is it right to got for eos R rather than going to eos R6 or eos R6
or need to look at Sony a7R IV
pls give us your valuable opinion which can help us ...
Its Achilles heel is how it flips from photo to video. I've watched a few reviews that mention it.
This is most Canon cameras currently.
Hope to hear more about the 20mp sensor.
What would you like to know
Is it safe to say it out performs itself quite comfortably?
@@TECH360TV You covered it, I wrote that before I watched. Too many "if's" for me. At $4000 it needs to be everything you said with no caveats. There are a lot of cameras out there that "just work" but they don't cost 4k and aren't limited to 20mp. I feel like Canon put this one out as a teaser to make people top up to the R5. It will also catch a few coming from crop cameras I suspect. I have an A7III and a 6DMK2 so this one is a no go for me.
@@blaineaburnettsr it’s at about 2600$ now, I think it’s worth it
Great review! Have you done a review of the R6 using the adapter? I have most of the L series EF lenses and just can’t afford to buy RF at this stage, plus I’ll keep them for my dslr. Cameras and lenses are ver expensive in Australia due to the fact that we have the Pacific Peso.
Thanks for watching. I have used it before and there is no difference in AF performance as far as I could tell from the RF lenses.
I understand the pricing there, prob best to order online to save some money if possible
@@TECH360TV wah this is damn useful advice.. cause i have loads of EF lenses and worried... cos i am on a 5DMk4
EF adapter is very good
@@TECH360TV ok sweet thanks bro cause i am considering going to the r6 over the 5dmarkiv cos of the video functions
I have the R6 since its first day it came out and it is expensive. But to me the R5 is way more expensive especially if you don’t use the 8k capabilities. For an extra CAD$1500 to upgrade to 45 mp I felt it wasn’t worth it at this time. It’s a great nifty camera and people using it will be happy. Great review spot on especially with your comment about 20 mp. I agree 24 or 30 would be great but 20 mp also (miraculously) works too.
Agree and I think both cameras need an adjustment in price to be honest. While the cameras for photography perform really good, the video is handicapped a bit thus not warranting the price hike
@@TECH360TV I agree 100%, it the price was a little cheaper then it would be fantastic. I am unsure if the price hike was the result of the pandemic (thus supply and demand) or just marketing of the cameras that in the end failed because of the initial overheating issues. My question is, in the intense heat of Singapore, does the R6 overheat? Because it is cooler in Canada (at least now) it does not so we have an advantage.
I think it depends on how one films with it. Short clips it’s fine. If you are filming one long shot for 20 min or so then can face an issue but most people don’t shoot that long anyways
I agree. I have had the R6 for a month now and am very happy with the results I am getting. For less than half the price of the 1DX Mark III in Canada I arguably have a better camera in most respects.
Yes it seemed that 24megapixels was the full frame standard now and at $2500 you would expect that from this camera especially with the new super expensive RF prime lenses to go with it..I wanna see what the 2nd Gen Nikon Z6 looks like first
So do you think the R6 is good enough for indoor sports (high ISO, fast shutter speed)? With my Canon 5D mark IV i usually shoot on ISO 6400, 1/800 and f/2.8.
Yes it is with the right lens of course
Been enjoying mine. Nice for confirmation. Waiting on 85 F2
Yes same.
Picked up my 85 f2 yesterday its AWESOMEEEE
i was Fuji X series for 5 years. Earlier this year i bought a Canon 5D mk iv. Big mistake. Not only were the EF lenses softer but the body created more camera blur at lower shutter speeds (accepting this could be my hand steadiness more than the equipment) but the results were poor compared to Fuji. i was about to switch back then the R6 came out. Bought this and so far been using with the RF 50mm f1.8 stm lens.
Wow!!! not only is it a beautiful camera to use and navigate around; it simply produces pin sharp and perfect images. it is simply perfect i would argue for anyone except very specialised professionals who's clients expect very large prints. My clients will be completely satisfied with the images even from this RF lens so the other lenses must be more than anyone would require.
The body is small and light; without it seeming greatly smaller than the 5d mk iv. Anyone who is wrecking their head deciding if to switch. Just do it. the R6 is brilliant. ps i thought i would miss the top screen but i haven't at all. looking at the back screen is so easy and probably quicker than using the top screen on the 5D mk iv
I hope i can inspire anyone to get this camera body as it will bring a lot of satisfaction and confidence, which without, photography is a nightmare
Glad you are enjoying this camera!
He's not kidding about that 800mm RF, that lens is super sharp and light
Impressive for the price
@@TECH360TV But only when considering the price. If you into fine art images and detail perfection, this lens is just not the right tool for you. For my work, any of these f/11 lenses are a no-go, there is no background separation, the ISO goes through the roof in the morning or late afternoon or at cloudy days. And on top, the optimal performance is for me just so-so.
Yes agree. For fine art it prob won’t be optimal.
@@TECH360TV Yes, it’s not. Just comparing 600mm primes of f/4 and f/11 - take the same camera and same shutter speed of 1/1000s, assume that on the f/4 lens this leads to ISO 1600. Then with the f/11 lens you would be at ISO 12800 already - at same shutter speed and with same camera. Terrible noise can be predicted, this f/11 is a no-bueno for wildlife as typically you take images early in the morning or later afternoon when the light is poor.
Yes. To me it’s a fun lens that will help bring people to sports and wildlife photography. However when you want to really make a living with it, need to upgrade the glass
5:27 A Canon official actually said that the sensors resolution equals that of a standard 24 MP sensor due to the newly designed low pass filter (introduced in the 1DX iii). But of course, you need a lens that allows for high resolution indeed :)
Yes. The RF lenses do just that
@@TECH360TV I stand corrected, according to dxo the R6 does not have the sophisticated AA filter the 1DX iii has. So next to the lens it has to be the closer distance between lens and sensor that gives the 20MP sensor such a great resolution for it's size. Or some other neat engineering effort. Who knows 😁 Bottom line - the pictures you took do look awesome. And since it's always the craftsmen that actually used the tool and decides whether the outcomes is good or bad - kudos to you as well.
Thank you!
Which Camera’s in the Canon line do you recommend for weddings?
Could you do a comparison video between the R6 and the Panasonic S1?
I won’t be able to have both cameras at the same time but the AF and tracking speed will go to Canon. Image quality would be a toss up. Camera size, Canon I a smaller but I like the feel of the S1
In terms of overall image quality, do you get the same IQ when using EF glass (Canon L series glass) with an adapter as you do with the new RF glass? Thank you!
Hmm depends on the lens but overall the IQ will be sharper and more refined with the RF lenses vs EF
@@TECH360TV And, then the question becomes...."How much better?" ha ha. My investment in EF L-glass to date and the deals you can get on EF lenses vs cost of RF glass makes this a simple budget decision for me. Looking forward to R6 purchase soon and praying the overall size with lens adapter + lens isn't terribly awkward/unwieldy. Thanks again for taking the time to respond.
Are there any focusing issues using the teleconverter? Would like to use one on my R6 with my 70-200 II.
No issues
the video looks sweet btw, what gear is it shot with?
Sony a6500
I wonder if the EOS R will get an update for animal AF and be almost on the same level...
without the IBIS of course.
So the Canon 1DX MK III at 20MP is the top end mirrored Canon for professional photographers. But 20MP on this camera means it's for social media and web? I've seen similar comments on some other reviews. I find this strange.
It’s not like we have a choice for the 1DX series. 20MP is good for speed etc but if you want to do large prints or crop your photos then I feel in 2020 it’s not enough. It will do the job yes but 24 or 30 is better for a fast camera like this.
Does the a7iii have a better dynamic range than the r6?
How do you think the AF compares to the Sony a9 (II). The Sony should be slightly better as it's optimised for sport, however if you have used the Sony, your comments would be interesting.
I feel right now they are both neck and neck. You can’t go wrong with either really
One small question and it might sound odd,but do you still get face/eye tracking through the viewfinder.
Yes you do
@@TECH360TV Great you just put my mind at ease,love the video btw.
You have the best Canon R6 review on CZcams. Cheers have a great week end
Thank you 🙏
Aperture 11 is just not good enough for me, but it's also strange that an aperture 1.2 lens is praised to the clouds when the same thing happens with two aperture 11 lenses, but make no mistake, because the Canon R6 and Canon RF 85mm.f.1.2 are probably really good, but the excitement can sometimes be a tad too much when two lenses with aperture 11 are praised so much.
It is otherwise a really good review as usual with many good arguments, so do not misunderstand my criticism!
No prob I understand. For me I just walked away more impressed with the f11 lens than I thought I would be. Especially for the price point.
Can you elaborate why 11 is not good? What would you do if you had a group picture where you need more aperture?
this just shows you that all of the CZcams pixel peepers are full of crap when they downplay the performance of the R6. Using quality glass is what really matters. The images are great from this camera. The f11 super telephotos though.. meh I'd prefer an EF f/4 over the RF f/11. They are sharp but I think f/11 doesn't give the same quality go bokeh that you get when you sell a kidney haha. Also I totally agree on the film grain look from the higher ISO images. Way more usable than a bunch of digital noise.
What do think about the R6 vs the A7iii strictly for photography?
R6 for Color and AF
Great review as always, but 20mp for wildlife is too low for cropping. 30mp would have been a sweet spot and would have replaced the 7D MKII. Stay Safe
Thanks Ian. I agree
It’s hard not to view 20mp as a downgraded R5, but I know many pros who swear by the legendary 12mp Nikon D700, there’s the 16mp Fuji XT1 after which they went a little down hill, Nikon DF 16mp all of which have been fantastic, I agree about the high price ,but all tech companies are doing that now, just look at iPhone 12. However I’m on the fence a little on the omission of cfexpress as it’s not so cheap.
Which one better for Photography picture quality wise Canon EOS Mark4 or R6???
Picture quality I might say the R is slightly better as it has more megapixels, but the IBIS, the better AF and two car slots make the R6 more attractive
“Sell the kidney” canon now that...😂😂😂😂
Lol
Excellent video, sir. I'm wondering if the R6 is able to Autofocus with the 800 f/11 + 2x extender attached? I was thinking that lens would not be AF'able (?) with a 1.4x or 2x attached due to the aperture. Thank you. New subscriber. :)
Hi Mark thanks for reaching out. Yes the AF works fine. No issues at all. In fact some of the images I showed in Lightroom were using AF with the teleconverter
Out of the EOS R or the R6 what’s better for image quality and photography?
I like the R for image quality but the R6 has more features that makes using the camera more appealing
I have both of them. The is R is a much better value. If you don’t do a lot of 4K videos I will pass on the the R6 and get the R with no regrets at all ! The R6 is not worth $1000 extra. R6 is not an upgrade, R5 is the real upgrade.
R6 only if you want IBIS, better focusing and Speed. R for IQ
Just curious with 20mp what would be the largest print size.
Not sure exactly but there are some videos and websites that say. I’ve printed A2 and A3 no problem though
What ur opinion for wildlife photography R5 or R6 ?
Just depends if you need high megapixel or not or if you are photographing wildlife in lower light situations or daylight. Both cameras perform almost exactly the same otherwise.
One bonus to the R5 is the CF Express Card slot as there will be no buffering issues when shooting high burst modes for capturing wildlife.
@@TECH360TV does really mega pixel matter or iso performance matters in photography ?
Yes it does. Better iso performance means less noise in lower light situations. Higher megapixel means better quality larger prints and better cropping abilities
@@TECH360TV @bobbytonelli can u check ur insta i just dm to u !
But I have to say although tempting ... don’t has the a7riii for under 2grand which is honestly the better buy... even the Sony a7iii with a bad ass dual lens kit for under 2400 bucks is a steal and still a tiny bit better than the r6 when it comes to photo and has dual memory cards and more glass and cheaper glass too for all budgets
Canon eos R or R6 for photography?
R6 now
you were right! I did end up getting it on a deal, a great one too! 😜🤓👍🏼 #happycamper
Your thoughts on the comparison between the RP & R6?
R6 has a lot more features but also higher price tag.
Where do you get your V-necks
Zara
I started with Canon and still have my original and ancient Canon 50D which I will never give up. Canons have some of the best color science. Their sensors tend to be behind in technology to the competition but they make it up with the color science. Images just look so good.
$2500 American.... I think that's an 'Ok' price. In 2012, I bought a new Canon 5D MKII for $2k. So it was already 4 years old and a good deal discounted. That had a 21MP sensor. That camera was used in all sorts of professional fashion work in the industry for like 10 years. The camera is legendary. I have plenty of photography from it in my current portfolio. Sharp and excellent color.
Now, the R6... 20MP... Totally fine for magazine-print work. Superior AF. Superior ISO. Superior DR, Superior and flip screen. Probably superior video functions. EVF. Dual card slots. The only thing the R6 doesn't have is a top LCD.
So, the R6 is actually a pretty darn good professional-level camera. The only camera I can compare the R6 to is the Panasonic S5 which shares many similar features and is price $500 lower than the R6. Or the fantastic S1 which may be superior to the R6 for the same price. Well, except maybe for the AF.
But wait a year and wait for the price drop to $2000. At that price, if I was a Canon user, I'd be all over the R6.
Who’s Frank? , seriously though, great review.
Is it a review on R6 or R5? Or different lenses ?!?!😶
It’s a review on the R6 with lenses. Because last I checked you need a lens so the camera works ;)
Review fuji xs10
Did you took this pics in isle of man
No. All in Singapore
Canon understands kidneys are Valuable 🤣🤣🤣🤣
😂😂😂
Another great review. It is overpriced, but at least this gives a chance to the competitors. Those f11 lenses did not convince me...
Thanks for watching. The f11 lenses aren’t that bad honestly especially for the price
The f11 lenses is why i bought into the rf system and they dont disappoint.
It's crazy overpriced in europe. Like €3000 body only
@@ghostzone985 Yeah, 33% more expensive than the a7III, which is just as good. But Canon has the best glass.
Yes but the lenses are also not cheap
I have no interest in video so thanks for your videoless review . I held a Nikon Z 6ii and Z 7ii before I purchased the canon R6 . The ergonomics beat the Nikon hands down, and felt so natural in my hand , so it swayed me to the canon . I previously owned a Nikon D800 , and have no regrets going to canon
Comparing the R6 against the Sony A74 may make is seem like nothing special, but I've also seen it compared to the A9 and A9ii, and it did very well, with most wildlife shooters calling it a tie. Considering the price of those cameras, the R6 suddenly seems like a bargain.
Good video but overall focus was more on lenses rather than on R6.
Thanks. That’s because I would be repeating myself since it’s very similar to the R5
Maybe im mistaken but the portraits you were showing as sharp did not look sharp AT ALL! You should check your images before you go on your next assignment.
Would you be happy with 20 mp or always wishing it was more?
Some are happy with it for their workflow. For me I would want a bit more
@@TECH360TV thats kind of what I thought too. really seems like the R6 is just not enough for how much it is and the R5 is way more expensive. What are your thoughts about the Nikon Z system? If you were to buy into one of these two ecosystems which do you think you would lean towards?
I’ve always liked the Z system and I’ll be getting the Z6II or Z7II for review next week
Put the camera on a tripod and try some cityscape shots at night with the 800mm with a slow shutter speed to avoid the noise then see what you get👍 @bobbyfingers
True for those type of scenarios but if you want to photograph anything moving will be challenging
If Keanu Reaves and Ricky Martin had a kid.
With this and the R5, I feel that the original R is a bit obsolete. What do you guys think?
Not sure if I would say obsolete, as it still takes fantastic images, but it’s more limited in terms of functionality
This is the Canon R6 real review.
Thank you 🙏
I would say this is a mirrorless version of the 1DX II with awesome AF and IBIS.
Has more of the 1DX III specs though
I appreciate this review as it is well done. This camera has a psychological barrier around it. It’s the lowest MP R camera made. It’s not really a good value. I feel like I’m rewarding Canon for something that is a little inferior. The 20 MP just bugs me a bit. I guess as a system being able to put a 800mm lens on it makes up for some of that high price.
I want the r6 cause its affordabel...but its those drop in filters that got me sold on grtting into the canon R system!!...i no longer have to under expose 2 to 4 stops just drop the nutral density filter in!!..(i been checking into BREAKTHROUGHPHOTAGRAPHY drop in filters)...the ability to shot wide open on a harsh light mid day is just gonna oprn up alot of new shootng possibality..PLUS..EF GLASS AND 3RD PARTY LENS WORK WITH THE DROP IN FILTER ADAPTER..VARY WELL FROM WHAT I HEAR ON CZcams!!...awsome autofocuse gezzzz....20 mp sensor....SO WHAT...dont crop in...it has an EVF..."you see the exposer before you take it"....WELL THEN FRAME THE DANG PICTURE THE WAY YOU WANT IT AND TAKE THE PICTURE...My goodness....walk closer to the subject..gezzzz...
But f11 was still a damn mistake. U have to sacrifice iso so much cus of the focal length and the aperture
You would be surprised. In bright daylight, I can get some Low ISO shots thanks to IBIS and IS in the lens
I think its too overpriced, because every competition (panasonic, nikon, and mainly sony) do these things better for a lower price. And i am saying that as a long time canon shooter... i just think that plasticky body, less resolution sensor and viewfinder, and other things they crippled on it are not worth 2500 dollars at all...i hope they will come out with something better next time
I also feel the price is too high. Especially in Singapore
The R6 is a great camera and is $1400.00 less than the R5.
Is ist bettet than the Sony a7iii?