Canon R6 Review for Bird Photography - Image Quality, High ISO Performance and Autofocus Tested!
Vložit
- čas přidán 2. 06. 2024
- Do you need an R5? or can the R6 capture high quality bird photographs? I share lots of photos and my thoughts after field testing the R6. I look at the IQ and ISO performance compared to the 5D Mark IV and demonstrate the amazing animal eye AF.
Let me know in the comments if you have any questions for the upcoming videos. Cheers, Duade
-------------------------------
Topaz Denoise
👍 topazlabs.com/denoise-ai-2/re...
--------------------------------
Join this channel to support me:
/ @duade
-------------------------------
👍My Paypal if you wish to donate directly: www.paypal.me/DuadePaton
Business enquiries: duade.paton@gmail.com
-------------------------------
Gear Used In Video - Amazon Affiliate Links
-------------------------------
Cameras
🛒Canon R6 geni.us/gtBKMos
🛒Canon 5D MK IV geni.us/EP0OP
🛒DJI Pocket 2 geni.us/rtt2Jbn
Lenses
🛒Sigma 50mm 1.4art geni.us/B9KqtC
🛒Canon 2x extender geni.us/wKVE7
🛒Canon 800 5.6 L IS geni.us/PUaBRP
🛒Canon 500 f4 IS II geni.us/vAsr
🛒Canon 400 5.6L geni.us/K4atL
Tripod
🛒Benro CF Tripod (C373T) geni.us/c0RMABZ
🛒Induro GHB2 Gimbal Head geni.us/qvydGBt
Bag
🛒Think Tank Photo Airport Commuter Backpack geni.us/5cu7NQ
Audio
🛒Rode VideoMicro geni.us/HTJXi9L
🛒BOYA BY-M1 Lav Mic geni.us/UUxCBS1
Accessories
🛒Lexar Professional 1066x 128GB CF Card geni.us/eT0dAO
🛒SMALLRIG Articulating Rosette Arm Max 11" geni.us/hGl2DLa
Mobile Phone
🛒Oppo A9 2020 geni.us/qresQBq
-------------------------------
👍Follow Me & View My Images
-------------------------------
Website: www.duadepaton.com
Gallery of my photos: photos.duadepaton.com
Instagram: / duadepaton
-------------------------------
Music
-------------------------------
Song: Atch & MusicbyAden - Sunrise
Music provided by Vlog No Copyright Music.
Creative Commons - Attribution 3.0 Unported
Video Link: • Atch & MusicbyAden - S...
Track: Until You're Gone Forever - Johny Grimes [Audio Library Release]
Music provided by Audio Library Plus
Watch: • Until You're Gone Fore...
Free Download / Stream: alplus.io/Uygf
Timestamps:
0:00 - Intro
0:31 - Video Contents
1:00 - Image Quality
3:11 - R6 Sensor Big Enough?
4:30 - Do More MP = Higher IQ?
5.57 - High ISO
9:23 - Dynamic Range
10:47 - Autofocus
14:30 - Focusing at f11
16:01 - BIF
17:01 - Eye AF Busy Setting
17:45 - Autofocus Issues
18:58 - Dainty Swallowtail
21:58 - Conclusion
22:51 - Outtakes
This is the best review of Canon R6 series for bird and wildlife photography. Hope to see you reviewing the R5 or the RF 100-500 in future.
Thanks Kiah, I appreciate the feedback, at this stage Canon do not support the channel so I have to buy or borrow gear, hopefully I will get the chance in the future. Cheers, Duade
Thank you so much for all the effort putting this video together, it's exactly what I needed. Top quality content as per usual and much appreciated. Cheers from Scotland!
G'day Rovle, it is my pleasure, I hope it's not too cold where you are at the moment, mind you I would prefer the cold then the 45 degrees we have forecast this weekend. Cheers, Duade
Finally, what I have been waiting for :) :) thank you thank you :):)
I'm glad you enjoyed it, Cheers, Duade
Great content, great presentation! Thank you so much!
you are more than welcome, Cheers, Duade
Thank you Duade. This is my first time on your Channel and I enjoyed your explanations and examples to illustrate the points you were making. And, I liked your straightforward approach , and honest appraisal of both the good and the bad aspects, which is refreshing to see. I do a fair bit of butterfly photography as well as some bird stuff, so the potential flaw of the AF on the R6 (and R5) for that genre of photography is worth knowing about. If I go with the Canon Mirrorless I will probably finish up keeping my 5D IV as my second body.
G'day Dave, my pleasure, yeah the AF is slightly annoying when it locks onto the background. I need to have another few sessions with butterfly's to see if it is a major, I have the 5D4 if I need it. Cheers, Duade 👍
It was a great review, thanks for sharing ,it is wonderful to see somebody with your experience doing all these comparisons well done Duade.
Ramin, it is my pleasure, Cheers, Duade
Looking forward to your posts this year. Amazing video.
Thanks Borislav, Cheers, Duade
I really enjoy your reviews! Great comparisons and coverage of all the important points! Excellent work!
Thanks for the feedback, Cheers, Duade
Great content as usual! Very interesting results! Especially regarding IQ and noise. Have a nice day!
Miguel, yes, I was a little surprised to be honest, shows the 5d4 is very capable. Cheers, Duade
Great video again, thank you, your actual video editing is class too 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
Thanks Roger, I appreciate it, yes, the editing can take a while. Cheers, Duade
Good info as always. Thanks.
Thanks Ern, I appreciate the ongoing support, Cheers, Duade
Oh wow this is the first of your videos I've seen and it's terrific. I just got an r6 and appreciate your insights. Subscribed.
Grant and welcome to the channel, I hope you find the videos helpful, Cheers, Duade
I think you're enjoying your cameras new challenges and perks! Thank you for the tips. Enjoying my 5D Mark IV. Hope you continue with your videos. God bless/cheers!
Mary, yes it is a learning curve that is for sure. Cheers, Duade
Another great video. Thank you!
Caroline, you are welcome. Cheers, Duade
Love the bloopers! And the rest as well of course 😉 greetings from Antwerp
Thanks David, I appreciate it, Cheers, Duade 👍
wow!!! Love your Honest review, as you are so realistic we can get a clear understanding of this Mirrorless System. Hope to see your upcoming other 2 videos. Have a great week ahead. Stay Safe and Healthy. God Bless You.
Jai, thank you for the feedback, I appreciate it. Cheers, Duade
Thank you so much for honest review. I actually saw more details in photos taken by 5D IV when comparing these two. I am not disappointed, it was expected - the difference of 10 Mpx can be seen here.
Thanks Ondrej, yes, it goes to show the 5d4 really was a great sensor. Cheers, Duade 👍
Great video and wonderful photos! Appreciate all the explanations and comparisons. Regarding dynamic range: as far as I know, dynamic range decreases a lot when increasing ISO. This means that shooting at lower ISO will give you far more details to in shadows and highlights to recover.
Thanks Christopher, yes, I believe you are right. It is always a balance with wildlife between ISO, Shutter Speed and Aperture. Cheers, Duade
Amazing video. 👏 Very excited for my R6. Arrives this week.
Thank you, enjoy your camera, it is fantastic. Cheers, Duade
One of the most comprehensive candid critique - on R6. Well done
Thank you, I appreciate the feedback, Cheers, Duade
Another totally honest and valuable review. I get the feeling that if you could put the eye focus into the MKIV that would make you a lot happier. Thanks Duade.
Richard, yes, I would have loved a 30mp sensor in the R6 for sure. Cheers, Duade
Duade, You put a lot of time and effort into this one........thanks
G'day Stan, my pleasure. Cheers, Duade 👍
Great review. Thanks for the info
My pleasure, Cheers, Duade
Very helpful thanks.
G'day, thanks for the feedback, Cheers, Duade
Thank you, Duade. Best R6 review I've seen. I have a Canon R5 and am looking at the R6 as a back up. Found the same focusing issue on the R5 but solved it by using the third focusing button (just to the right of the * button) as a "spot focus" button. Works in almost any situation. BTW, Canon should sponsor you. Very professional.
Thanks Craig, glad to hear you are enjoying the R5, I hope to get one in the future, I also appreciate the feedback. Cheers, Duade
I have a third button as a spot focus as well but can you explain under what circumstances would use this button?
Great review!!! Very useful
Thank Juan, I appreciate the feedback, Cheers, Duade
This video was easy to watch & very educational. I learned a lot! Great job!
That is great to hear, Cheers, Duade
Thanks for such an honest and fresh appraisal of the R6. Most of us photographers don’t hear such real life experiences in the typical CZcams camera reviews. You were very detailed and covered many small glitches that most people would not realize until after they bought the camera. Thanks again.
My pleasure Jerry, be sure to watch my latest few videos as I am liking the camera more and more as use it. Cheers, Duade 👍
@@Duade oh thanks Duade! That sounds very promising. I’m glad I found your channel!
@@jerryeisner1 Welcome, I hope you find the channel helpful, Cheers, Duade
From an ex Canon shooter with nostalgia I must say that I love your videos and delivery.
and Thank you, Cheers, Duade
Thanks a lot for the detailed video daude. As always extremely informative and to the point. It was worth the wait for your video and looking forward for the next one.
I think I wouldn’t go wrong with either R6 or the 5D mkiv. I would rather prefer the megapixels here as a personal choice just for being able to crop in tight
Cheers 😊
G'day Riyaz, yes, it is tough, the 5d4 is an amazing camera, just the buffer lets it down a lot. The R6 would have been amazing with the 5d4 sensor. Cheers, Duade
@@Duade ha ha daude hope canon could see this comment and yes a 30mp sensor would be great on R6. But seeing the image in your video I could still see sharp details there.
Making it all the more confusing
Really great video!
Thank you. Cheers, Duade
Really good video. Super informative. Thank you very much.
Silviu, my pleasure, Cheers, Duade
I do enjoy the out takes and how you show the realness of it all 😆
Great video that addresses a lot of the issues I was having. I even got to the point of selling my lens but you have restored my faith and given me some ideas to try. I was thinking some issues I had were just my lens but it looks more likely its the lens/camera capabilities. Thank you for a great video
It is my pleasure Keith, Cheers, Duade 👍
Superb review.
Thanks David, Cheers, Duade
Great review. Looking to upgrade from a 7DII. You're review is the first one to mention the issue with not being able to grab the subject again if your camera grabs the background. Thanks for the info!
Thanks for the feedback, be sure to check out the video I did showcasing the AF issues of mirrorless here. czcams.com/video/L06kMSYnFO4/video.html Cheers, Duade
Hi Duade, first time viewer here! Love your content! I actually came to research the R cameras for Canon because recently, I unfortunately lost my camera bag of a 60D and 2 L lenses.. I've not been keeping up with the camera releases so it was amazing that you had such a nice technical review. I was interested in the Video 2 you mentioned at the start of this video but could not find it on the sidebar. I believe (from watching other CZcams videos) it would be possible to link to them from this video, so that would be a little suggestion of mine. Anyway I am going to your channel to try to find it. Keep up the amazing content! Subscribed!
Thanks for finding the channel and commenting. I never did get around to doing more videos unfortunately, my apologies. Sorry to hear you lost your camera bag and lenses. It is a tricky time to be buying Canon cameras as I believe they are on the verge of releasing APSC mirrorless bodies to replace the 90D series. At the moment the R6 and R5 have the auto eye which is incredible, but they are expensive. You could always go second hand in the meantime like. Good luck with your choices, Cheers, Duade
Very nice video, I can say from my expierience that you are right in your conclusions. For me the big gamechangers are the AF and the tilt screen compaired to a 7D MII wich I used before. My EF glass works better now, more sharp picture's also on birds in flight. The tilt screen makes it easy to get low shots handheld. As an example I have 300mm F4 and 400mm F5.6. For butterfly's (and a lots of other stuff, like mushrooms) I like the 300mm F4 better, you can get much closer, has IS and is sharp. Looking on the tilt screen and handhold it is very easy to make nice picture's. Looking forward to your next viedeo's.
G'day, great to hear you are enjoying the camera, yes, the MFD of the 400 5.6 is its biggest weakness, great to hear the 300 f4 works well for you. Cheers, Duade
Another great video Duade. The R6 is definitely on my “ save up to get “ list.
Thanks Harry, happy saving, Cheers, Duade
Very helpful objective review. I find the 100-500 mates well with the R6. The lock on to the background often happens when there is not a lot of difference between subject and background.
Thanks Taylor, I appreciate the feedback. Cheers, Duade
There AF options have settings for lock on stickiness, and also whether to hunt when focus not acquired. Adjust them might help the focus problem.
Thanks for the comment and suggestions, I have tried every AF setting and unfortunately nothing overcomes this issue. It appears to be a limitation of the mirrorless AF which I hope they address in the future. Cheers, Duade
Good one Duade
Thanks John, Cheers, Duade
Thank you for your very honest review, my current camera set up is a 5D1V with 100-400 mkii and 500 F4 Mk11 Lens, I’m seriously considering going over to mirrorless R5 as a step up but I’m not yet convinced after you take away all the hype of the eye detection focus system, For me I always end up cropping a lot so composition is not an issue, so providing I focus on the eye everything else falls into place and this for me is part of the skill. You could argue the R5 will take the fun out of the challenge and just add frustration with focusing issues. But the high ISO capability is the temptation along with the 45 megapixels of the R5, the R6 doesn’t seem worth the upgrade from 5D Mk1V especially as I love the this Camera and Lens combination. Regards Chris
G'day Chris, if you can afford the R5 it is an incredible camera and is a big improvement over the 5d4, the Animal Eye AF, Buffer, Larger MP, FPS make it a very attractive option. However the 5d4 is still a great camera and takes wonderful images. Cheers, Duade
you have such a huge and lovely garden Duade !
Thanks Saju, I am grateful for what I have, Cheers, Duade
Just discovered your channel and really enjoyed your review of the R6. Cheers from Michigan, USA.
G'day Mark, thanks for the feedback and welcome to the channel. Cheers, Duade 👍
@@Duade, You're welcome!
I still love my 5d Mark 3, but the R6 is what I'm using these days. Found your review helpful and fun. Love the outtakes and also that you show the raw, then crop and final shot. Good on you mate. I'd be very curious to know what you think about the 100-500 RF. I'm about to go for that. My current EF V1 70-200L is a dinosaur
Matt, I hope to have a go with the 100-500 at some stage. I will be sure to share my thoughts. I also have the 70-200L, it maybe old but it still takes nice shots. Cheers, Duade
thanks !!! you fix too much of my questions :-) I think to purchase the R6 :-)
G'day Andrea, glad I could help, good luck with your purchase, Cheers, Duade
The difference between the raw image and the final result of your photos is sometimes unbelievable. Post-processing being one of the most important parameter in bird photography, could you make a video showing the basic edits you make in post-processing
yes, there can often be a big difference from the Raw to the processed image, I will look at doing an updated video on processing. I have a few you may find helpful here. czcams.com/play/PLftsgqGE1dmbBwsmMiBa27iYv2POr-FG5.html Cheers, Duade
Hi Duade, I find that the R6 works really well with birds in flight. Today I was shooting seagulls being fed and they were flying in the sky. I had no problem locking onto to a single bird and following it as it flew. The focus point would be over the eye and I only took the shot when every thing was perfect.
The camera tracked the bird as it swooped and dived all over the sky infront of me. The photos came out super sharp. I can send a few phots, if requested. I am not using 2 button back focusing but only front button focusing and I have camera set up to track bird. If I push half down the blue light comes on over the bird eye. if I release the button it turns white and still tracks bird eye across the sky and I can press fully down anytime and take the shot.
regards Mike
Thanks Mike, I appreciate the feedback, I am happy to hear you had great success. I had a similar experience recently with some gulls, the eye af performed very well. Cheers, Duade
Great review. I have the R6 paired with the Tamron 150-600 G2 and I'm having the same issues with focusing. It's very frustrating.
Kim, yes it can be frustrating for sure. Cheers, Duade
Excellent video and review! In your high ISO comparison with the 5DMkIV I was easily able to pick out the R6 every time. Not based on image sharpness but in the level of noise. Particularly in the background. The R6 has less noise in every case. I'm not sure I still consider 3200 "High ISO" on these newer cameras as they all seem to do quite well. I would have liked to see a comparison of truly hight ISO such as 25600 or above. Or even your photo that is at 51,200. I think this is the area that the R6 may begin to shine vs the 5DMKIV. Topaz is a remarkable tool. If the high ISO image goes in with less noise then the output of Topaz is just that much better as you know. Thanks for all this info...new subscriber her!
G'day Darren, thanks for the comment, I didn't make it clear but two of those comparisons were at ISO12800 only the red cap was 3200. Yes the R6 is slightly better but I can't help but think I would rather the extra MP.
Yes, Topaz does allow you to shoot at high ISO and still have nice photos which is great. Cheers, Duade 👍
And this is the best review of my R6, Thanks. I like the ISO performance as long as you don’t go extremely high. You go home when there is no more light lol
G'day Peter, thank you, I agree, I also head home once it gets dark. 😀
@@Duade the comments from Peter B and yourself about going home when it “gets dark” have sold this camera as far as I’m concerned, I suffer so much with the 7Dii and 5D iii, thanks again
Another great video Duade and thanks. I had and returned the R6, found focusing and sharpness not as great as I had hoped. And yes if you crop a lot like me and most birders, I suppose more MP would help although I have seen some amazing images from the R6 and a 300mm. Animal eye focus worked well on stationary birds but occasionally struggled with ducks flying in towards me, especially as they neared the surface of the water. Most of the time it was fine thou. I also wasn't crazy about an EF to RF adapter coupled with a 1.4 extender, perhaps some issues with communication between the lens and the camera. Occasionally as I look through my Adobe Bridge files, I see a really nice image and am surprised to see it was from my 7d mkii. How I longed for a 7d mk iii. Mirrorless is cool but I suppose I'm still a DSLR fan, for now anyway. Cheers!
Thanks Scott, I appreciate your input, sorry to hear it didn't deliver for you. The R7 might be the camera many birders are waiting for. I have had some issues with the R6 however I am enjoying it the more I use it. Cheers, Duade 👍
I traded my 1DX2 and 5dsr in on a R5 and 6 and so happy with the change. I still think the 1DX2 high ISO was better than the new R's but they are both so much better than the 5dsr was. The animal eye af is great, not perfect but much better than any dslr I used. I also had the problem with not being able to focus with my 600 F4 from going to near to far or the other way, it is annoying but a quick turn on the focus ring gets you there. Not sure I could ever give up this auto focus and go back to a dslr.
, I agree I prefer the mirrorless AF to the DSLR as the eye AF is a great improvement. Cheers, Duade
Great review Duade.
I've found a slightly different way to setup the combination of Eye-AF and Single/Spot AF that has one advantage and one possible disadvantage over the way you are doing it.
If you set your main AF mode in AF1 menu to be Face/Tracking, turn Eye-AF for Animals on and then make sure that in AF5 menu Initial Servo AF pt for Face/Tracking is set to AUTO.
The back button you want to do Face/Tracking/Eye-AF would then be assigned to AF/Metering Start.
You can then set your alternative rear button to be Single or Spot AF via Custom Buttons: AF/Metering Start, hit INFO to enter Detail Set and select your alternative Single or Spot AF mode (I like the smaller Spot size myself).
If, and only if, you setup this way the advantage is you get to "see" what the camera is "thinking" ahead of activating AF. You will see white boxes show up on subject, head or eye if the camera has detected them (basically the same boxes you see in blue once AF is engaged). I find this very useful because then I don't hit my Face/Tracking back button for AF until I know the system has found the bird. This avoids hitting AF and having the system jump to other distractions.
Now just like you show in the video if I don't see the white boxes showing up, I use my alternative Spot AF to focus on the bird, then I switch back to the Face/Tracking/Eye AF back button if the white squares start to show up. And just like your example with the bird in heavy brush, usually it does start working after you focus on the bird with the Spot AF point.
Now the only downside with this setup is you have no way of moving your Spot AF point around because it is a secondary mode and you have to push in your back button to engage it.
For myself I haven't found much need to move my Spot AF because I'm just using it as a helper for the Eye-AF to take over right after.
Give it a try and see if that works for you. I've showed it to a lot of people now and almost all have switched. Some have needs to move the Spot AF so they set up the camera more like you are now. I just find it such an advantage to not have AF go off and grab far backgrounds or surrounding twigs because I don't engage the Auto Eye-AF until I know the camera has figured things out. You also will get white arrows to switch between multiple subject's eyes detected...although I haven't found that very useful.
G'day Geoff, thank you very much for sharing your setup, I am sure it will help others. I will have a go myself and see how I find it. I assume you will still run into the problem of the camera focusing on the wrong thing when using spot AF if eye af cannot see the subject. That appears to be my biggest issue is when I place the focus point on a butterfly yet the camera decides the background is far more interesting. Cheers, Duade
@@Duade Hi, yes you still will run into that issue if focus ends up way on the background and the camera can't "see" the near, grossly OOF, subject. The one thing that my setup helps with is you won't activate Face/Tracking/Eye AF unless you see the white box on the subject, then you can be pretty much certain it won't just default back into focusing on other things (which can be a distant background) which it will do when it hasn't identified a subject yet. But as you say when you engage Spot AF with my setup if your spot AF isn't on the subject it can still drive to the background. I'm mostly using Spot AF for birds in trees/brush with branches around them like you showed in that one example in the video. If I'm shooting a perch out in the open I find the Eye-AF usually finds the bird if I was previously focused somewhat close to the perch. If it isn't "seeing" the subject (no white boxes showing up) then I often use Center Zone AF ( I have that on another back button) as it covers a greater area and you don't have to be as precise in placing the small Spot right on the subject. That would minimize the times it jumps straight to the background. But all of that relies on you being prefocused somewhat in the correct range, once focus jumps way out then I have to resort to the same workarounds you mention in the video (aiming at the ground or manual focusing). Problem is that my RF 100-500 doesn't support direct manual focus override like an EF lens does so I can't use that technique without switching the lens switch into MF which isn't easy or fast to do.
@@geoffn8963 Thanks Geoff, I wasn't aware of the 100-500 not allowing manual override in AF. I guess it just forces you to try and be more accurate when placing the focus point, or purposely focusing on a large subject in a similar focal plane knowing the eye af will pick up the bird. Again, it doesn't help too much in my butterfly example as you have to use traditional AF and rely on the camera picking up the butterfly when you put the focus point on it. Cheers, Duade
It is the good review of R6 for bird photo. And looking forward to seeing your review for R6+ef-r adpoter+tamron 100-400mm f4.5-6.3. in the future.
G'day Li, thank you, I'm not sure I will be getting hold of the 100-400 in the future. Cheers, Duade 👍
Your videos are always the best. Thanks for sharing. Although I'm a Nikon user😄
G'day Ivan, all users are welcome here, I even have friends that use Nikon. 😉👍
Just discovered your channel and have watched seven of your videos so far. I recently upgraded my Canon 6D Mk 1 to an R5; still shooting with my 400mm 5.6. Really enjoy your photography and helpful tips. I'm curious what body you are using for filming your videos? What part of Australia are you based in? Looking forward to enjoying many more of your videos!
Galen, I'm glad you found the channel and are enjoying the videos. I use my 5d4 & R6 for the stand up piece to camera and using a Pocket 2/phone to film in the field. This seems to work for me. Cheers, Duade. Oh I am in the North East of Victoria. If you google the Warby Ranges, I am very close to there. Cheers, Duade
Hi,thanks for your reply.I enjoy photographing both in the new and the old world.I photograph stills and there is nothing severe going on these days.I am a birding man and tomorrow Ill go to my place and feed those my little frienfs.
Sounds like a great time had with the birds. Cheers, Duade
Thanks Duade, very interesting great video. I've just bought a R6 body after strongly considering the 5D4.Will be using your tips as I'm a keen raptor photographer based in South Africa.
Dave, congrats, you should find the advanced AF on the R6 very handy for BIF. Cheers, Duade
@@Duade Hi Duade not sure if you have heard it seems Canon are putting out a focus firmware update 2nd Dec saw it yesterday on R6 user group, cheers Dave
I'm thinking of buying an R6 to replace my 7Dii and this video has amazingly useful detail - thanks so much Duade. I do enjoy photographing birds but my primary goal are medium sized mammals - many of which tend to be first & last light subjects; so what I'm really searching for is low-light capability combined with my 300 f2.8 - I'm hoping the R6 is the right choice.
G'day Ian, the R6 will allow you to shoot at ISO12800 with confidence which combined with your lens should give you plenty of shutter speed in low light. It will be a significant improvement on the 7D2. Cheers, Duade 👍
That was interesting Duade. Could you perhaps do a video of a 'head to head' between the R5 and R6 relating to Bird Photography.
G'day Roger, I hope you are well. I hope to have a play with an R5 soon. The R5 is the superior camera with that amazing sensor. Functionally it is very similar to the R6, you are really just paying for the amazing sensor. So if you don't think you need 45mp then the R6 will be fine. If I had a choice I would go with the R5. Cheers, Duade 👍
There is a lot of speculation of a new Canon R7 apsc mirrorless for birding coming out this year, exciting times :)
Colm, yes, it is very exciting to see how the R7 performs, it could be the ultimate birding camera. Cheers, Duade
Hadn’t heard this rumour, so thanks Colin. This could be a great replacement for my 7Dii.
Great video. Hope to see a possible R5 video soon.
Daniel, I would love to test the R5, I just have to get hold of one. Cheers, Duade
Not a problem. I’ll be here waiting. Until then, keep up the great work with the awesome content.
@@danielschmaderer Thanks Daniel, will do, Cheers, Duade
Hi, thank you very much for this really clear and precise review of the r6 :), i was wondering what picture profile are you using ? or which one would you recommend ?
thank you again :) great content :)
nicolas, I use the standard picture profile, I make a number of changes to the RAW file during conversion. Cheers, Duade
@@Duade Great :), thank you for your answer.
Excellent review. I also noticed the focus issues you described. Can indeed be annoying.
yep very frustrating for this grumpy old man lol
Just wondering if its possible to use spot AF and then the joystick/multicontroller to reacquire focus quicker if you've accidentally focused on the background and the eye AF is having trouble finding the subject ?
@@AYC-yg9on Unfortunately, it doesn't matter where you place the AF point the camera cannot detect the bird with eye af or standard AF. You have to manually turn the focus ring, use focus preset or focus on something close to the bird. Cheers, Duade
The case 2 autofocus sticks to the subject better. It’s helped me in a similar situation that you’ve encountered with the butterfly
Thanks TS, I have been switching between Case 1 & Case 2 and still having problems, it has no issue sticking to the butterfly if it detects it first, the issue is when the camera detects the background instead of the butterfly and sticks to that. It simply won't let go of the background. So, it's not an issue of not sticking to the subject it just sticks to the wrong thing. Cheers, Duade
@@Duade I see, in that case I'll let go off the AF button and then press it again. Probably try to focus closer near the subject until you kinda see it
@@ts76751 Yes, that is an option, focus on something closer and then let the Eye AF do its thing. Cheers, Duade
I see that the EOS R is still well used, it would be nice to have your experience. Thank you for the fantastic review 👍👍
G'day Daniel, I have not used the R but I'm sure it takes lovely shots as the 5d4 sensor is very nice. It just lacks a lot of the benefits of the R6 and R5. Cheers, Duade 👍
@@Duade Do you think it is worth to move on the R6? My concern is the sensor. 20 Million Pixels vs 30.... quite a big difference! would be nice to have cropping comparison R6 vs 5D Mark IV if you still have it 🙂
Thanks for a helpful review! I'll stay with my 5D MKIV until they they fix the mirrorless background lock focus problem, if they can ever fix the problem.
G'day, it is a slight inconvenience for sure, let's hope it can be fixed. Cheers, Duade
@@Duade as previously mentioned here... RTFI 😉🤣
Hi, this review is brilliant and really helps with decisions on R6 versus other models! One question please - it looks like you are using EF lenses presumably mounted with the RF adapter. I understand that you only get the 5/6 axis stabilisation with R5 and R6 when a native RF lens is mounted. If you use EF lenses with the adapter I understand you "only" get close to standard 2 axis stabilisation. Is this your experience and is this level of IS any worse when on an R6 versus a 5D4 ?
Great question Chris, I have not noticed any major difference in IS between the 5d4 and the R6, if anything the R6 is better. The only issue is if the EF lens does not support the 12fps, it's not a major but 12 is better than 6.8. Cheers, Duade 👍
Bugger it Duade you're 2 weeks too late with this, I got mine already. I'm happy with it so far but I shoot a lot with my pixel peeping mate with an R5. "just zoom in" he says, "bugger off" I say. LOL all good mate enjoyed your honest take on my new camera and look forward to the rest of the series.
G'day Davo, congrats on the R6, it is a great camera but those 20mp make you feel a little inadequate when shooting next to an R5 😳
I got the same focus issues with my Canon EOS R and the RF 100-500, once the focus is one the Background it will stay there for ever.
And thanks for the promo code waited for one :)
Daniel, yes, it is annoying, glad you enjoyed the video. Enjoy the software, it is impressive. Cheers, Duade
Great bird review. I have the same setup, except i use the ef300 f/4. You described all the issues i have. When the bird is the bush, i have to manual focus and see if AF will pick it up from there. Hummingbirds are my nemesis, they are so fast and blend in well. I wasn't happy with the RF800 so i am still looking for a prime. Not a fan of zoom lenses but i might give the RF100-800 ago.
Thanks for your comment, what was it about the RF800 you didn't like?
@@Duade IT was soft on the edges. The aperture was too high. Not very good in low light or shade. i did like the weight. 1 out of 5 years shots i would keep. Took a great moon foto.
of course i meant RF100-500
@@vOCesUGa1 I would love a 100-800 ;-)
I got R6 for birding and it is wonderful. However, I may upgrade to R5 because I have to crop a lot.
yes, the R6 is a beautiful camera, the R5 just seems far superior. Cheers, Duade
When are we going to get the settings video? Really looking forward to it.
Hopefully I can look at doing one at some stage, in the meantime be sure to check out Jans R5 setting video, the R6 is very similar. Cheers, Duade czcams.com/video/-nnRqgXu7QI/video.html&ab_channel=JanWegener
Thanks for the review Duade!
I’m now sold on the R6. Would you have a suggestion for a good (but inexpensive) zoom lens? I was considering the Tamron 150-600 G2. Would love to hear your thoughts. Unfortunately the Canon 100-400ii and 100-500 RF are too expensive at the moment.
i would say sigma 150-600 would be better but primes r best!
Sharang, unfortunately I don't have any experience with either the Tamron or Sigma 600 zooms so cannot suggest either. I know they are very popular, and I am sure there are a lot of reviews online. Sorry I cannot be more help, I do hope to test both lenses at some stage. Cheers, Duade
Yes, it performed well with my 400 5.6. Cheers, Duade
Outtakes? I thought you did it perfectly the first time - every time.
60% of the time, I get it right every time.
Interesting video. I am not sold on the mirrorless system yet. The R6 doesn't appear to be too much of an upgrade over my trusty 5D Mk IV.
Gday, yes, they take very similar photos. The buffer, FPS, and eye AF are great improvements though. Cheers, Duade
Nice looking video and a lot of good information. What camera did you use to shoot the video.
Lawrence, I use the R6 and my old 5d4, Cheers, Duade
Thank you for this wonderful review of the Canon R6! I recently purchased it and encounter the exact same frustrating autofocus problems, especially when trying to take pictures of hawks in flight. The camera wants to focus on the sky in the background, and no matter what you do you cannot get the camera to focus on the hawk in flight. This is with my Sigma 150-600mm lens. What I end up having to do is zoom back out to about 200-300mm, then the camera will focus on something more along the same plane as what the distance to the hawk is, and then I can zoom back in on the hawk. But, if the hawk is out of range for the eye AF to capture the eye, if I don't keep the AF point exactly on the hawk, the camera goes back to trying to focus on the sky. Definitely much more frustrating than when I had my DSLR. But, hopefully they will come out with some type of update to fix this issue.
, yes, it is very frustrating for sure and I hope they can overcome this issue in the future. Cheers, Duade
@@Duade Good afternoon!! Ok, so after some changing and experimenting with settings, I think I fixed the problem on my Canon R6. I went into the AF menu (pink or purple) and screen #4, I changed my "Lens drive when AF impossible" from OFF to ON, and that seems to have fixed my problem! Now, when I focus on a distant tree with a branch in the closer foreground, at first my camera will focus on the distant tree but if I remove my finger from the shutter button and press it down half way again, the lens refocuses and finds the closer tree branch (so long as my AF focal point is directly over the foreground branch). I have not tried using the Intelligent Eye tracking mode yet to see if it works under that setting, but under a regular Spot AF setting, it worked for me. Hope this helps you! :)
@@speedypickup Thanks for the update and I am happy to hear it has helped you, I do have Lens drive switched to on and unfortunately, I still have issues from time to time. It mainly seems when I have a horizontal perch and a small bird that I am close to. Cheers, Duade
I have found that I needed to learn a couple of quick override options if it's not getting the eye, in particular the thumb override on the screen to set the focus point. The other option you mention using your thumb on the focus ring is another useful option. I imagine there may be some firmware enhancement to tackle the background locking. Overall, as a combo with my 5d mkiv I feel happy that I don't need the R5, how about you?
Simon, the more I use the camera the more I realise just how impressive the eye af is. It really is incredible once locked on, the images are just sharp, with my 5d4 a lot of the time some shots would just be soft for no reason like the focus had jumped. I would often refocus a number of times whilst shooting the same bird just to be sure one burst was locked on. I never have to worry with eye af, if the focus point is on the eye then the images are going to be sharp unless the bird moves or I do. Cheers, Duade
Tnx very helpful esp the discussion/ examples of resolution n picture size and the ISO ones. Indeed I expected better on the ISO side. Looking forward to the next 2 video parts. I think the acid test will be birds in flight and if it can keep up with the 1.4 or 2 x. Are you keeping the R6 or opting for the R5?
Dimitris, thanks for the comment, the Eye AF is pretty amazing and I am sure is far superior for BIF. It is a tough call if I keep the camera, it is hard to justify spending another 3k for the bigger sensor. I may wait for the R7, if that has 30mp and has ok noise then it would be an extremely attractive option for birds. Cheers, Duade
@@Duade Tnx I appreciate the af will be good for BIF the issue is if the battery can give enough juice to move the lens motors fast enough when you have a 1.4 or a 2x mounted. I am at a similar situation trying to justify the extra money on the R5. I hope that if an R1 is announced a lot of pros (esp if major sports events like the Olympics take place) may trade in their R5s for R1s, creating a 2nd hand market for the R5. Also in your calculations factor in the difference in the shutter count between the R5 and R6 it is almost double and for wildlife we do burn shots. Finally judging from the laid back attitude of Canon sensors where the R6 gets the old 1DX sensor, the R the old 5div, and so on I would expect the R7 to use the 90D sensor which has not been that great in high ISO (reviews said the 7DII was better than the 90D at high ISO and the 7DII is not that great at high ISO to start with). This is similar to the less than hyped R6 high ISO performance you are experiencing. Tough call indeed and I’ve been playing it back n forth in my head. And I think both are overpriced and probably when the R7 launches that would be overpriced too. Stay safe and healthy.
@@dimitristsagdis7340 Yeah you are right and the R5 is likely the best option, it is just hard to justify the extra cost for me at the moment. Yes, it is likely wishful thinking re the R7 sensor, it has been so long since I used the 7d series that I have forgtton what it is like. I can only hope it gets the APSC version of the large FF MP camera that is rumoured. Good luck with whatever decision you make. Cheers, Duade
@@Duade Tnx yeah, I still shoot a 7DII and so the memory is kept fresh :-)) I too wish the R7 sensor can be better than the one in 90D and that R5 prices drop. As I do not have an immediate need to buy I'll try to postpone for as long as I can.
Nice review, Duade. One thing that doesn't seem to have been mentioned about high ISO is the difference in post. I have found the R5 about a stop better than the 5D4 but there is a huge difference in how they clean up at high ISO.The R5/6 retain much more detail during noise reduction. As for focusing at small maximum apertures the difference is that with DSLR a lot of the light entering the lens has to be directed to the viewfinder. Only a small portion is directed to the passive focusing sensor. With mirrorless 100% of the light entering the lens can be used for focusing hence the ability to focus with a maximum aperture of f/22. At 15:44 you say that f/14 is very restrictive but you are referring to the aperture that you stopped down to - not the aperture the camera uses for focusing. The camera uses the largest available aperture for focusing and only stops it down for the actual shot. An analogy here would be using an f/2.8 lens. Even if you stop it down to f/22 the camera is still using f/2.8 to focus and closes the aperture to f/22 when you press the shutter (assuming of course that you are not using a manual aperture lens).
Thanks Steve I appreciate your knowledgeable input. Yes, the R6 did appear to handle noise reduction well, I would have to do some tests to see if I can see a difference. Thanks for the info re how the cameras use the light.
Thanks for info re max aperture used to focus, I had read that before and have mentioned that in previous videos. When I was referring to f14 being restrictive I was meaning you need a lot of ambient light to get sufficient SS without having to use very high ISO. If it was overcast or in the forest you would really struggle to get high quality shots at f14 as your SS would be very low or your ISO very high. Cheers, Duade
@@Duade That makes sense, Duade. Sorry for the misread on that one. It does seem that as ISO performance improves slower maximum aperture lenses are gaining a broader appeal. I think the usefulness of those lenses or faster lenses with teleconverters really has to be evaluated by the user based on their particular scenario. In my case I often walk around with the 400DOII with a 1.4x or 2x teleconverter in fall through early spring when available light is quite high. When the canopy fills in I'm back to the 600 f/4 or the 300 2.8. I do envy those able to get along with F/11 lenses though. I'd probably be driving a nicer vehicle if that was my case ;).
@@SteveSSBB G'day Steve, if I looked at the apertures I have used I would say I rarely shoot wide open, one of the reasons I sold the 400 2.8, I just didn't take advantage of its speed. I have to admit I have been jealous of the Nikon 500 5.6PF, it is just so light. When I use my 400 5.6 it really is a joy and I do find the size of the superteles a little bit of a pain at times. I am sure you notice a big difference between the DO and your 600 f4. I think a 600 5.6 DO would be ideal. Cheers, Duade
@@Duade There are patents floating around for an RF 400, 500 & 600 that use DO. Hopefully something will come out of it. I agree that the 500PF is a nice lens. I used to shoot Nikon and Canon till the release of the D750 as my Nikon gear was free but when it came time to make a choice Canon was the better overall ecosystem for me. A lot of it has to do with service. I don’t know how things are in your neck of the woods but here Nikon service is plagued by long turnaround times and blaming repair issues on clients to avoid warranty coverage. Everyone’s needs are different but that was an issue I couldn’t live with. People wax poetic about the differences between systems, but at the top end they are more similar than dissimilar. Sometimes it is the little things that make or break a relationship. If you have pangs of jealousy about the 500PF I suggest you pick up the RF 100-500. It is only 2/3 of a stop slower, lighter and to speak quite frankly the gap between optical quality of zooms vs primes has become negligible. The RF 100-500 offers far better AF performance than the EF 100-400II paired with the 1.4x too. Highly recommend you try the 100-500 if you haven’t already.
What I've found to REALLY increase the potential to lock on a subject that is small in the frame and moving is set the base or main AF mode to Eye AF. What this does is enable the bracket box that tells you what the camera wants to focus on before you engage the focus. I use this because for wildlife photographers, focus with the initial focus point on a small bird is incredibly difficult. Again, this has something to do with the way these bodies use the single point. With a DSLR, this was no problem, but with the R5/R6 (and probably all the R's) the single point is very difficult to use on small subjects. So I rely on the pre-focus bracket box and once that is on the subject I want, I lock it with the focus button. This allows me to use my second button as the center single point for those moments when I just need to hit a certain point. Making the flip, Eye AF as the base setting and traditional as backup or secondary, has made a MASSIVE improvement to action photography for me. Grabbing a burrowing owl or Kingfisher (with a 2x on a 500mm) in mid flight, or a diving tern (no 2x, but same 500mm) sold me on it. Personally, I used to LOVED the initial focus point on the DSLRs, but its just not as versatile on the R bodies. Give it a shot, and don't worry about using "Only Eye AF" for everything... truth is very good for everything.
G'day Mike, thank you for your comment and advice, I have tried just about everything in this scenario with no success. I have tried Eye AF only and if the Eye AF detects the BG then it locks onto it, and I have to use the manual focus ring etc. Also, Eye AF doesn't work for insects, butterfly's and some reptiles so you have to use traditional AF which is when I have had some issues. I will keep trying and see how I go. Cheers, Duade
@@Duade, Sorry I wasn't clear. There's nothing I've found for the out-of-focus focusing, this is a hint on grabbing focus on fast moving subjects.
@@mikejackson9585 Thanks Mike, I will give it a go next time I have a BIF session, Cheers, Duade
Hi Duade, thanks for the great comparison! One thing to consider also is that R5 and R6 have an improved anti-aliasing filter design covering the sensor, which does not add so much blur as 5D4's AA-filter does. I dare to claim that if we compared an R5 to an R6, the R5 would render superior in image detail and downsized to R6's resolution (using e.g. bicubic interpolation), there should be slightly less noise, at worst an equal amount of it. The downsides of the higher-res R5 are bigger files and slower workflow, more proneness to motion blur and camera shake including shutter shock. The image's colors could also break down (become visibly poor) earlier compared to R6, at very high ISOs.
To me it seems that the R6 is quite an upgrade over 5D4. :)
I would really love to test the R5 and R6 side be side to see if there is anymore image detail on the downsampled R5. I have played with RAW files from the D5 and D850 which have similar sized sensors and I could not see a difference. Download the D5 and D850 and take a look. Cheers, Duade neilvn.com/tangents/images/nikon/d850/iso-test/
The files from D5 and D850 look indeed very similar with regard to noise when viewed at the same resolution. Here I see two things however:
(1) The two sensors are technologically different (D5 is front-side iluminated, D850 is back-side illuminated), which are also differently tuned, D850 being the one more tuned for landscape use and maximal dynamic range, versus the D5 being rather heavily tuned for high-ISO noise performance at the price of dynamic range at its base ISO.
(2) Lens blur (lack of perfect lens sharpness) in combination with AA-filtering makes that on the whole, a higher-resolution sensor tends to be able to extract more information from an image taken with the same lens, compared to a lower-resolution sensor.
Now this gets a bit nerdy... I checked DxOMark's measurements and they confirm that the D5 and D850 are almost equal from about ISO 3200 onwards - the D850 leads with almost nothing at all ISOs except beyond 12800, from then onwards the D5 leads by almost nothing - so very similar. Where the D850 beats the D5 is close to the base ISOs.
The situation between R5 and R6 shows a similar pattern - R5 leads over R6 close to the base ISOs, but they switch their positions only at the last setting, ISO 102400.
Interestingly, both R5 and R6 quite rock over D5 and D850 at any ISO beyond 400 - 800.
The comparisons are taken from SNR 18% as printed and the measurements are here:
D5: www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Nikon/D5---Measurements
D850: www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Nikon/D850---Measurements
R5: www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Canon/EOS-R5---Measurements
R6: www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Canon/EOS-R6---Measurements
Anyways, beautiful images produced and the joy with the camera in the field are at least a million times more meaningful and important than measurement numbers and comparisons like the above.
Cheers!
@@mk0x55 Gday, thanks for your detailed response, yes a lot of the technical aspects go over my head, at the end of the day either camera is going to take amazing photos. It appears that the R5 sensor really is a step up from Canon and has a lot more real world benefit than the R6. Cheers, Duade
Nice video, i used to be a Nikon d750 user then switched to canon 90D and did notice too much noise even at iso 500 i know it was crop sensor but i never seen on nikon even on my d3100, now sold it and going for either D500 or D850 for sensor performance.
Yes, FF cameras such as the D750 are far superior to the APSC bodies in regards to noise. The D850 is probably one of the best DSLR's on the market. Good luck with it. Cheers, Duade
@@Duade thanks
@Maciej Jan Długosz Thanks for that, guess it is fair to say most modern FF cameras will have a higher pixel pitch compared to modern APSC bodies and I assume the newer the sensor the better its noise handling is compared to its pixel pitch? The R5 has a lower pixel pitch than the 7D but is likely 3 stops better at high iso. Cheers, Duade
Hi,I have the same experience with you.I bought my first R6 last september and had the issues compared to 5D mark IV and I returned it.One month ago I bought R6 again and I fell in love with it because of its fantastic birds eye tracking.But in in certain cases Mark IV work lot better.Many bird photographers have been asking me ,is r6 that good -I say yes ,but dont sell yuor dsrl right away.
Erkki, I am enjoying the camera the more I use it that is for sure. I think mirrorless wil just get better and better over time. I'm glad to hear you are enjoying yours. Cheers, Duade
Hi Duade, could you also compare on the 2nd video, the number of FPS and Shutter sound? I Know your 500mm f4II does the full 12fps mech. Shutter, but the 400mm f5.6 doesn't. Cheers
Miguel, will do, it is a lot quieter that is for sure. Cheers, Duade
good review! thanks a lot. what lens adapter did you used?
I currently use Canon 1.4 & 2x version 3 teleconverters. And the Canon RF to EF adapter. Cheers, Duade
Topaz de noise plugin is a game changer
Carl, yes it is very impressive that is for sure. Cheers, Duade
Great informative video. Have you tried the RF 800 f11 on the R6 at all?
I am starting to get some good results with static and in flight birds using it and wondered if you might have had a chance to try it.
Wishing you well.
Dave, yes, I had the pleasure of using it, you can see my photos here czcams.com/video/Kor_MZw1EN4/video.html I didn't have too many chances for BIF and struggled with the smaller AF box to be honest. Glad to hear you have got it working well for you. It is a fantastic lens for the price that is for sure. Cheers, Duade
Thanks Duade for the review of the R6. I was considering the camera, but the poor low light performance and AF issues means I will give it a pass. I could live with the 20meg file size, but when you add in the other two issues no thanks. Too many compromises for such an expensive camera.
G'day Michael, it is still a great camera and has many advantages over a DSLR, however if you don't need those features it maybe worth waiting for Canon to sort out the issues from their first few mirrorless cameras. Cheers, Duade 👍
Would love a R6 vs R7 video ☺️
Thanks Roger, I will look at comparing the cameras for the review, Cheers, Duade
In this video, you said that you were going to make two more videos to go along with this one. I would like to see the one on the R6 camera setup for bird photography. When will the other two videos be available?
Randy, I have had a few other videos and events that have taken priority unfortunately, I will try and do a settings video in the future. Cheers, Duade
Nice review and comparison. I think the 5Div images looked nicer.
Thanks Simon, the 5d4 is a great camera that is for sure. Cheers, Duade
Thank you for your review for this camera for wildlife/high zoom use.
Curious on how you process the raw file? Do you convert it to tiff/dng via DPP or directly edit the raw file in lightroom?
Also how does you track BIF when you continuous shooting since the screen will black out as opposed to dslr? Do you use the IS during the test for static and during BIF?
I currently using original 6d with this 400mm f5.6 combo for "metal bird" (plane spotting) and considering to either upgrade to r6 or stick to 5d mark iv since both are damn close apart from megapixel count and better DR in r6 (also the focus issue you having). What do you think?
P.s i am happy user of this lens, abosultely no regrets using it for plane spotting and motorsport. Since its non weather sealed, i just wrap a towel and shoot under the rain lol
Surprised you still hold and use this lens considering you currently having all the top tier lens👍
hamtairo, I use Lightroom at the moment but DPP appears to handle the colours better, however I find DPP horrible to use. For BIF I simply find the bird in the viewfinder and then engage the eye af and it does a good job of finding and tracking the bird. I don't really have any issues with blackout as it stutters slightly but there is no noticeable black screen. I always leave IS on as Im too lazy to switch between.
I think the R6 would work amazingly well with planes as it would have no issue detecting it in the sky and the AF is quick, the buffer is amazing. However the R5 would make more sense perhaps as you could crop that a lot more if the plane was small in the frame.
I like the 400 5.6 as it is very light and sharp. Cheers, Duade
@@Duade Cheers for the reply on how you use your camera. Much appreciated👍👍
I myself also used Lightroom for photo editing on raw file itself. I only use DPP when dealing with super high iso by converting to TIFF and go through Topaz Denoise before minor adjustments into final form via LR.
I agreed DPP is pain to use but it seems to yield better end product in processing high iso images into TIFF before insert into Topaz Denoise.
Surely R5 will be useful for me especially where i do crop when using with my 400mm lens. Just found that cost to get one is extremely dear. Not to mention the extra accessories stuff like battery and especially CFexpress card & reader(i have assortment of sd cards in my disposal) which cost a bomb too. Ateast r6 looks more logical purchase and keep the extra money on lens/other stuff in life.
Worse case i just get a used 5d mark iv as upgrade from my 6d.
Thanks for replying my message once again 👍
I'm using the 5DsR and 6D Mark II, but mostly for landscape work. Although the 5DsR isn't a low light beast, it's surprising, how well it performs on higher ISO levels compared to the 6D Mark II or the 5D Mark IV, which i have also testet. Tests show that the R5 beats the R6 on ISO performance up to ISO 25.600. The higher MP count makes noise look far less unpleasant than on the low MP R6.
MK26, thanks for sharing, I assume you will be interested in the large MP R5 that is coming, that will no doubt be an excellent landscape camera. Cheers, Duade
It is very frustrating with the background focus issue. Have you figured out anything since? Thank you for this it was very informative.
It is my pleasure Terri, unfortunately not, I either shoot at the ground/perch to bring it back or use the manual focus ring to pull focus which you can do whilst in autofocus mode. Cheers, Duade
Hey Duade. Greetings from Florida!! Great Review. I am a Nikon and Sony Shooter. I am considering purchasing the R6 and the new R 800m lens for a longer lighter reach. Sounds like The R series bodies are the wrong way to go from your experience even with the better Canon glass. I think I stick with my D5, D850, and D500 or maybe trying adapted F lenses on my Z6. I have the 200-500, 80-400k, and the 600Vr. Shooting flyers is a acquired talent. You need the right light and background. I like the birds of prey. My Sony A7Riv works with the 100-400 and 200-600, but I find the tracking difficult...at least more difficult than the tried and true Nikons. Keep up the good work. I enjoyed your insights.
G'day Ralph, thanks for your comment, I may have been a little harsh in my review, the R5 & R6 are very capable cameras that produce very nice photos and their high ISO performance is very good. Stay tuned to the channel as I hope to test some of the lenses in the future. Cheers, Duade
@@Duade Duade, Thanks. I will stay tuned. Thanks for responding. Your channel is very well done sir.
you got a new subscription mate
Thanks Paul, I hope you enjoy, Cheers, Duade
@@Duade I use similar gear to you, I have 300 500 600 and the extenders, 1.4 and 2x, as I said in a previous vlog the extenders work better on the 300 and 500, very soft at 2x on the 600 but that is the older mki version so probably the reason why
Paul, yes, the version 2 lenses and version 3 TC seem to work best. I remember using a version 1 lens and a version 2 TC and it was so slow and painful. Cheers, Duade