'What are you hiding': US pushes Russia on vetoed nuclear weapons in space resolution
Vložit
- čas přidán 24. 04. 2024
- Russia has vetoed a UN resolution to stop the development and deployment of nuclear weapons in space.
The draft proposals called on all states with “major space capabilities” to “contribute to the objective” of preventing an arms race in outer space.
A total of 13 of the council’s 15 members voted in favour, with Russia - one of five permanent members with a veto - voting against and China abstaining.
Read more: www.telegraph.co.uk/world-new...
#russia #usa #unitednations #news
How about.... No nuclear weapons on earth. That might be a very good place to start.
Sure, it's like Ukraine has given all its nuclear weapons for peace...
There would be equally wars, perhaps even more devastating, as there would no longer be the fear of total destruction in a few minutes.
@@aleksklochko. Because Ukraine has no ability to maintain nuclear missiles. Besides, Russia inherited all the debts of the USSR. And some factories were moved from Russia to Ukraine during the Soviets time. Crimea was also moved from Russia to Ukraine and now the west calls the Crimea referendum to join Russia illegal annexation.
@@T15L94 those russian propaganda cliches are disconnected from the reality.
there would be more conventional wars. its a fact. if there would be no nukes, NATO would already joined Ukraine and fukked russia in d azzz
This video is misleading. Russia and China have proposed to ban all weapons but the US vetoed that one 😂😂😂😂
that's because everyone knows Russia and China are known to lie and break any proposals they make and sign, just like Putin's agreement when he signed on the Budapest Memorandum not to Invade Ukraine.
Exactly!
why they cut off next part of his speech lmao
tbh he should not be even allowed to speak in UN, ruzzia cannot veto UN resolutions, it's not a member of security council, it just stole USSR place
There was nothing important what the russian representative said there after the cut. He didn't mention once why this resolution is "bad" in his perspective. He only used surficial words to describe something but never went into detail. I have listened to his few sentences after this cut and nothing useful came out of his mouth. In other words it was just blabber by this russian representative.
@@RuLeZ1988 Was your selective hearing because of your cognitive dissonance?
😁😁😁Он объясняет свою позицию в вырезанной части. Для американца не важно что думает остальной мир
@@robertsteele474 Then enlighten us all, what has the russian representative said, that is bad about this resolution? Please, let us know and go into detail, without blabber.
I like the Russian proposal much better. Only a complete ban on the development of weapons of all types for space.
So why veto something lesser?
@@bg1616 This is a loophole for the United States, with its help it will be able to mislead the entire democratic world.
@@bg1616because they don't agree with this proposal simple
@@bg1616 bc the US is getting ready to use other types of weapons in space, and the only thing they are afraid of is the nuclear weapon.
@BROLY__ you'd usually compromise or settle for the current time and creep up to the next level later.
Russia should have just responded with: "F around and find out".
Russia said clearly that they want ban on all weapons, not just nuclear in space. Cutting out what Russia said in full is something Telegraph is used to doing. Weak propaganda.
Propaganda;
Russia and China proposed to ban weapons of ANY kind and the U.S. and 7 other countries voted against that.
Painting Russia as the bad guy here is hypocritical
Ok goodbye
Really, russia and china good guys? 😂
@@larisam6755 ikr, these people act like china and russia arent trying to create space weapons
😂😂😂 Even if they did , can anyone blame them for not trusting anything from the US
us, china, Russia are all bad guys@@larisam6755
That thumbnail 💀
💀💀💀
Yea shows what Russia really is
Everybody has raised their hand in this nonchalant way… the gesture by the fascist is strict and straight…
@@Aurxa09 Қызықтыру.
A good moment to remind, that the USSR and later Russia several times proposed to abolish nuclear weapons at all. And guess, who was against?
Another lie from russian troll.
Haha, yeah right. Nuclear weapons exist, great if they didn't but they do. We all know Nukes are the ace the Russians play, just look at Ukraine - Russia only behaves like it does because it has Nukes.
even in this meeting russia proposed to ban all types of weapons from space and the US was against it.
Richard IVAN Saunders. That's another thing that NEVER happened.
@@Dark_Bandon Russia’s banned political parties
Communist Party of the Soviet Union Communism, Marxism-Leninism
Communist Party of the RSFSR Communism, Marxism-Leninism
Russian National Unity Neo-Nazism
National Bolshevik Party National Bolshevism
National Socialist Society Neo-Nazism
Slavic Union Neo-Nazism
Northern Brotherhood Neo-Nazism, Slavic Neopaganism
Becouse Russia stands for space without any weapons not only nuclear, but USA and Nato don't want that.
But russia doesnt stand for that on earth.
Russia lies all the time and does not respect international laws… Putin is a imperialist mafioso who steals Russian people 🤢🤮
@@Andy-ub3ub they did but the US disagreed
Why Russia will do it behind the doors.
the hypocrisy is insane
Its a pointless vote because ICBMs do what they do
but faster, and during a nuclear exchange, every second counts.
No it's not because when they are in space there is no warning of incoming missiles buy "HEY" If the west burns so does the Bumski Mir
Also because theUS vetoed the Sino-Russo resolution banning ALA weopnas ins pcae (including nukes). TheSU wants to have its cake and eat it too. Because the Russ' have more advanced nuke delivery vehicles like SARMAT and Avandgard etc
Hi
Hi
That’s not completely correct. Russia wants a resolution which prohibits all kinds of weapons in space. But the US do not want this. Why?
2 bananas per comment?
because US has something russia does not, far better than nukes
@@ciuyr2510 lol let me guess Diversity🤣
Isn't there already a treaty or whatever that says there can not be weapons in space?
Because the USA is the axis of evil. They want to be the first.who will launch nuclear weapons into space and threaten the whole world. What is unclear?
A total of 13 of the council’s 15 members voted in favour, with Russia - one of five permanent members with a veto - voting against and China abstaining. but they just say Russia in the headline.
so what ?
Because only Russia's opposition caused the resolution to fail. It would have passed with China's abstention.
@@Denime *just like U-S veto failed Pal-esti-nian statehood resolution*
@@Denimedont be so naive.
As if the US never use their veto lol
This is just stupid when they don't need nuclear when we already have scalar interferometry
The question is would the US have nuclear weapons in space even with a UN resolution in place.
No that’s the whole point of the resolution being in place
@@OKeefeist
1. **Iraq**: The United States led a coalition to invade Iraq in 2003 without explicit authorization from the United Nations Security Council. This action was considered by many to be a violation of international law and UN resolutions.
2. **Israeli-Palestinian Conflict**: The US has often supported Israel in its actions in the Palestinian territories, including settlements in the West Bank, despite UN resolutions condemning such settlements as illegal under international law.
3. **Cuba**: The US has maintained an economic embargo against Cuba for decades, despite repeated UN resolutions calling for its end.
There are more instances where the actions of the United States have been questioned in relation to UN resolutions.
@@NF-we4kp 1. Remove terorrists
2. Remove terrorists
3. Shouldn’t have got involved with the dispute and sided against America.
Resolutions are only for other Nations the US makes them for others to follow not themselves..... They break soo many international laws and act like they are the police of the world
@@NF-we4kpdid the US approve (sign for) those UN resolutions??
Since when does the US follow resolutions? What did they say, there are not binding?
Why should they?, due to 8000 sanctions against the Russian Federation, and Western interference in Ukraine, all bets are off in relation to Nuclear weapons, technology transfers, Nuclear testing, renewal of the START treaties etc.
All sanction to Russia are deserved, the one who has been interfering in Ukraine was always Russia. Stop lying.
All those measures against Russia are in response to Russias offensive against Ukraine. What did they expect?
@@bg1616 Even though Ukraine is neither a member of the European Union or NATO, the point is that the US cannot have it both ways, and will discover the cost of no longer having the Russian Federation as a global partner in areas of counter terrorism, nuclear proliferation, nuclear testing and development treaties, neutrality etc in the next US/UK/NATO intervention/invasion.
@@John-hu9qg Yes but Russia COULD have been a partner. It's Russia with its hostile actions in Ukraine caused this
Ukraine belongs to the WEST not the United Federation of Fascists.
Alsoo show when russia. Explains why they vetoed the resolution..... basically russia proposed that there shall be no weapons in space and the US vetoed it now the US proposed that there shall be ban on specific kinds of weapons that are already baanned in a treaty held in 1960s
I STAND WITH 🇷🇺✊🏽
How about not giving any country a veto on any matter?
That's a very good point. I fully agree.
What if someone puts a resolution to do something bad?
Какой смысл тогда вообще в дискуссиях, в НАТО, в любых союзах, если сильный будет решать за всех. Тогда и Китай никто не остановит, а уж извините если убрать весь ваш американский лоск и море, морище пропоганды из каждой дырки, то Китай вас задавит в пыль во всех смыслах.
@@SilentTraveller21 Then a majority of votes from others who want something good can stop it. But when someone _does_ something bad and a majority vote on a resolution to stop the bad can be blocked by a single veto from a single country, even more so a veto from the same country actually doing the bad, then we have a problem.
@@larsrons7937in this world there is not only bad and good. There is a personal or group interest in money, business, and power that can disregard the good things. But anyway they should limit the amount of veto from each country per year so they will use it wisely.
Uncle Fester used to be a lot funnier, than he is today!
Prigozhin was a better Uncle Fester, anyway.
Well is it a genuine concern or halting progress the latter deserving the finger
The construction of a future new generation manned spacecraft (called ‘Federatsiya’ and ‘Oryol’ at different points) is in its final stage, Roscosmos CEO Yury Borisov said.
"It is in the final stage of construction," Borisov said during a lecture in the Tsiolkovsky State space exploration museum in Kaluga.
The spacecraft’s first flight is planned for 2028, he said.
According to the CEO, the spacecraft was initially designed for the lunar program. However, the program was postponed, and the spacecraft was repurposed to deliver crews to the Russian Orbital Station, which will enter construction stage in 2027.
The existing spacecraft project is too big for this purpose, and it is being adapted for orbital flights around the Earth. The spacecraft will be taken into orbit by the Angara-A5M heavy rocket from the Vostochny Cosmodrome.
I think the U.S. thinks that Russia will have S -600 that will be on space stations and could make the U.S. strategic missiles almost useless.
Why did Lex Luthor veto this resolution? Why are the russians so bad at hiding their true intentions?
Russia and China proposed to ban weapons of ANY kind and the U.S. and 7 other countries voted against that.
u mean the US right??
Russia has nothing to hide, unlike the United States
Did anyone else notice the notsee salute?
Well Russia and Germany were buddies during World War 1 until Germany screwed Russia over
All thirteen of them?
let's remember a little about history: The invasion of Russia by the United States and the United Kingdom, among other Western countries, in 1918, is a milestone in Russian history, often mistakenly portrayed as part of a Civil War. It lasted more than two years and involved the deployment of more than 200,000 soldiers, of which 11,000 were from the United States and 59,000 from the United Kingdom. Japan, which was an ally of Great Britain and the United States during World War I, sent 70,000 soldiers. Furthermore, the American threat of a nuclear war against Russia was made more than 78 years ago, in September 1945, when the United States and the Soviet Union were allies. It consisted of a “Nuclear War Plan” that targeted 66 Soviet cities with more than 200 atomic bombs. The US intended to take advantage of the fact that Russia was weakened after defeating Germany on the battlefield, but according to documents released in 1975, the US was unable to manufacture these nuclear bombs., today we see history repeating itself, as Biden said before Congress, the Ukrainian people are disposable and are being used as cannon fodder so as not to have to send Americans to fight the Russians.
Because Russia already has them in space.
Russia wanted it to incule ALL weaponds in space, something that US didn`t want to iclude so what are they talking about.
Roscosmos cosmonauts Oleg Kononenko (TASS special correspondent on the ISS) and Nikolay Chub have opened the exit hatch of the Poisk module of the International Space Station (ISS), according to a streamed video of this year’s first extravehicular activity (EVA).
During the spacewalk, Russian ISS crew members will install hardware for the Kvartz-M and Perspektiva-KM research experiments outside the Poisk module and complete the deployment of a radar on the Nauka multipurpose laboratory module (MLM), which could not be fully installed during the previous EVA in October.
If the astronauts have time, they will remove the Biorisk-MSN science equipment container from the Poisk module, deploy the pressure and deposition control unit on the same module, and take wipe samples from the surface of the Nauka MLM as part of the Test experiment. The cosmonauts are expected to spend 6 hours and 52 minutes outside the orbital outpost.
This EVA is a seventh in the career of Kononenko, who is wearing Orlan-MKS spacesuit No. 5 with red stripes, and a second for Chub, who will be wearing Orlan-MKS spacesuit No. 4 with blue stripes, as well as the first during the 70th prolonged expedition to the ISS. Before the spacewalk, the cosmonauts prepared the spacesuits - they replaced disposable elements, checked the operation of all systems and changed the protective glass of the space helmets.
The previous spacewalk under the Russian program took place on October 26. Kononenko and Chub disconnected the external circuit of the Nauka module’s radiator, which earlier developed a leak, and also inspected the spot of the leak itself. The cosmonauts also installed a small-sized radar on the Nauka MLM module to monitor the Earth's surface, but it failed to deploy automatically. Chub tried to set the radar’s panels into position manually, but after several unsuccessful attempts Mission Control told the cosmonauts to finish the spacewalk.
I'm a Russki Pidor🏳🌈and that's why I'm not man enough to sign a military contract. Plus my boyfriend won't let me.😂
A direct drive open nuclear propulsion unit for a spacecraft can be made and launched into Deep Space with no complaints from the Russians or put in geo sync orbit over Moscow ?
Nuclear bombs in space are not used to threaten the surface below but to cause an EMP with detonation that destroys the electronic equipment of all satellites that have no defenses against this type of attack. Since the USA has the largest number of surveillance satellites in the world for both civilian and military purposes, the US military, which depends heavily on GPS to coordinate its activities, would suddenly find itself in the conditions it had during World War II , where it could only rely on radio communications on the ground. Most American long-range weapons work with GPS. The Russian army, on the other hand, depends much less on satellite activity. This is why the US is alarmed by the news that Russia is developing nuclear weapons to be stationed in space, which in one fell swoop could knock out the entire American satellite network.
@@trumpforever6706LMAO, the Russians stuck civilian GPS systems in the cockpits of their Mig29's in 2022 as they needed reliable GPS technology. Their glide bombs, which is currently the biggest threat to Ukr troops, are fully dependent on GPS.
@@trumpforever6706 someone is forgetting the earth is actually round and there is another side of orbit. which technically wouldn't "knock out entire American satellite network", satellites are already EMP resistant up to a certain degree;
also here is a bit of education:
electromagnetic waves emitted by the sun are of a broad spectrum ranging from X-rays with a wavelength of 2 nanometers to radio waves with a wavelength of 10 meters
(honestly I don't know why I interact with this brain rot information)
@@Deathadder90 The Russians use Glonass, not GPS, furthermore some Russian glide bombs, like the Drel, also have an inertial guidance system.
The two countries should av a direct fight and let's see who will win
The world and humanity loses, that's for sure
Well that opens the door for the USA to put weapons in space
All weapon should be ban not just wmd!!
russia proposed that and the US vetoed it.
Disband the UN
The US will have rods from god in orbit. That's why. 😂
The Russians seem worried.
NOPE... the US is worried to be hit any moment
Worried how when the U.S is scared of Russia 😂
@@BruceJ999
I'm sure that the one who is NOT afraid of Russia is the US, ha, ha, oops.
Russia can’t even beat Ukraine so why would the US be worried?
@@SgtCake101
He who threatens the most is the one who fears Russia the most, he who does not fear the US acts, and this update was demonstrated in Ukraine.
I thought gringos liked the arms race
A complete ban or nothing.
What Russia says is not what Russia does.
The Russian ambassador vetoed, very good
Total bs
Pointless because Russia would do what it will regardless
They had resolutions before и точка
I watched the full video and the narrative is bad .
Russia ambassador said if US raise the preposition that All weapon should be band in space not Only nuclear weapons
they need to change the rule that it needs to be 2 negative votes Not 1
when the people get nuked from space and the people will never see it coming
The problem is that US and China already have thous nuclear weapons flying above us in spacecraft
I see it in my dream , it's a weapon that creates a lightning ⚡ bolt
This must be the so-called Russian peace.
the US just showed its hypocrisy.
Un is orgazion for teft🤮
Love is the key to the lock of a situation that the world finds itself in. Not further judgment of each other
go hug a bus
Sounds kinda sus
true. bc the russian guy counter proposed to ban all types of weapons from space and the us said NO
Yes! Russia won't tell everything, and that is blackmailed!!
what about Palestinian statehood?
And there goes the toothless UN again - this irrelevant organisation desperately needs a reboot.
So US is the only one that uses Vito?
lol....as if USA and Russia don't have weaponized satellites since the 80's...
Russia China 🤢🤮🤮🤮🤮
russia has all the right to defend itself 🤍💙❤
😂😂😂
This gets boring 😂😂😂
From the Clown comedian pretending to be a President in Ukraine
ppl also have the right to make stupid comments
Like a criminal defending their crimes no less.
lol so no one gonna question usa israel vetoing food as basic human right and the cease fire
Thanks to USA for saving the whole world. Russian & China 😂😂😂
We all remember how US ignored/disrespected multiple deals and treaties with Russia and other countries, they want to talk about rules? 😂😂
We should just Terraform Mars with them. Warm the ice up.
i guess that means nukes in space
Why dont u come and look for it why speculate
Who tf is representing the USA in the UN?😂🤡
Russia is correct
this resolution already there since the 50's
How many treaties has ruzzia kept
Im confused . Who is against wmds in space?
America.
@@richardmarsden5610. A truck driver working for the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) took photos of Iron Dome air defense batteries and sent them to an Iranian-run account on Facebook, Hebrew media reported on April 25.
The Israeli Public Broadcasting Corporation, known as Kan in Hebrew, said that the driver took dozens of photos of Iron Dome batteries while on duty and sent the footage to an account he believed belonged to a woman he was in love with.
The driver “voluntarily” documented the Iron Dome batteries with their locations and sent them to the supposed woman, only to later discover that the account was fake and that the information was handed over to an Iranian side, the broadcaster added.
The Iron Dome was developed by Rafael Advanced Defense Systems and Israel Aerospace Industries mainly to intercept and destroy short-range rockets and shells. However, the system can also engage more traditional aerial targets, like fighter jets, helicopters, drones and cruise missiles. The system has a maximum range of 70 kilometers.
Israel claims that the Iron Dome system has a success rate of around 90%. Nevertheless, the system’s effectiveness has been questioned on numerous occasions since it first entered service with the IDF in 2011.
During the ongoing war in the Gaza Strip, the system failed to intercept thousands of projectiles, including rockets and drones, which were launched at southern Israel by the Hamas Movement and other Palestinian armed factions. It also failed to repel several rocket and drone attacks launched at the northern part of the country by Hezbollah from Lebanon.
Iranian cyber operations against Israel have been on the rise for quite some time now. In the last few years, Israeli intelligence and security forces unveiled several Iranian cyber operations which were meant to collect intelligence and even recruit spies.
@@richardmarsden5610. The US is only against other countries' having weapons in space.
Observe how at the end the chinese guy is shacking in his bones while the US women says "what could u be hidding" also hes so agitated
Whatever is right lol
This is dreadfully funny…imagine Russia asking the west to wait up so they can catch up 😂
Russia will veto everything , even own veto :)
If u dumb nato idiots don't watch wat ur doing ur gonna be permanently vetoed... nobody is gonna need tge yankees preety soon😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
As if the US wouldn't do the same.
they had an ammendment to say they want to stop any type of weapon in space. UK and US voted against that amendment thats why they vetoed.
@@u.2b215 GO on, post the stats. Lets see who's #1 abuser of the veto :)
@@ZyNeEnZyNe I never said the US has (ab)used the veto the most, nice try though.
William 0:20
Russia 🇷🇺👹💩
Criminal usa
🇲🇨🤝🏼🇷🇺
Same way usa vetoed Palestinian statehood
Same attitude, Russia or USA.
Eh? Only Russia is veto'ing
In favor to USA .
I love russia 🇷🇺 ❤❤❤❤❤
🇷🇺 🇷🇺 🇷🇺 Слава Русскому Солдату!!!
Dr Strangelove!!??
PARANOIA ATTACK OF THE AMERICAN WITH CHILLING AFRAID EFFECT...😂😂😂😂😂
We indians also vetoed here 😂😂😂😂😂😂
Simping for Ruzzia?
@@anthonyhulse1248 Simping for USSA?
Mexico have 20 nukes in sonora State 😮
Russia is working on modules that via rockets can deploy nuclear weapons in space. It is logical to Veto.
And that is something that is provocative to the entire planet
nope russia counter proposed to ban all types of weapons from space and guess who doesnt like that : the US
HA HA. Russia can't even take the Donbas so forget about taking out space weapons.
@@richardmarsden5610. but China probably can , Russias big daddy
@@richardmarsden5610. And how the war in Ukraine affects Russia in any way with this plan? The Rocket test was succesful.
Who has votoed the most
Russia.
Russia defending the indefensible,
Showing why they never stopped being the enemy of the west.
they are correct. The Russian guy proposed a counter proposal to ban all types of weapons from space and the us disagreed. the US only wants to ban weapons it is afraid of while Russia proposed to ban any type of weapon including nuclear from space. the US was such a hypocrite, watch the full before judging.
@@cheatcoddes US doesn't have any nuclear weapons in space. Russia seems awfully concerned with maintaining that possibility for itself tho
@@Deathadder90 Thanks to Russia's actions today. That's all about to change.
@@Deathadder90 So why didn't the US agree to ban all weapons in space, including nuclear ones, since that was the primary purpose of the resolution? Could anyone therefore deduce that there are already other types of American weapons in orbit, for example killer satellites, perhaps equipped with lasers, and that the United States would have had to dismantle them if the expanded resolution had been approved?
The Russian envoy doing a very revealing - but not surprising - salute in the thumbnail...
this meeting has taught me how hypocritical the US is..
Russia shouldn't be deciding on this, shouldn't be deciding on anything in fact. The UN outlived its purpose decades ago. It's time for the new alliances
That’s why there’s bricks. The new world order
then the US also should not decide according to your logic. so hypocritical.
@@cheatcoddes My logic is that the country that starts a full scale war (which is considered a gross violation of the UN statute), should not be a "decision maker". I can elaborate on HOW the Russian Federation conducts it's war (which is one everlasting war crime), but in this case it's not important here. The fact of war is important. They think if they call it a "special operation", they are in the clear.
@@Tati8796 The UN has approved many wars with full US approval, Tati.
@@Tati8796 And the already forgotten 2003 invasion of Iraq? Were Saddam's weapons of mass destruction then found? That "special military operation" had not been approved by the UN. So what would the gist of your speech be? One weight and two measures?
Jajaja why is the russian dictatorship even there?
Почему мы должны делать то что вы хотите, мы делаем то что нам нужно
@@petorpetrov9170then leave the UN and expect to be pushed back
lol u must be American
@@petorpetrov9170 ребенку должны пояснить взрослые, что можно делать, а что нельзя. А вы ведёте себя словно испорченный ребенок.
@anthonyhulse1248 тебя забыли спросить что нам делать
RoFL!! Russia just dug their own grave on space weapons.
It’s a New Cold War
Here's a point, the USA could have put nuclear weapons into space decades ago, but never has. Discuss
Here's a point, the Russia could have put nuclear weapons into space decades ago, but never has. Discuss
@@robertsteele474Your mirror implication then begs the question of, why the veto then?
@@bg1616 Why did the US veto the Russian inclusion for a full weapons ban?
@@robertsteele474 when? Google throwing nothing up
@@bg1616 just watch the full meeting bc it did happen. why do u think they cut him off in this video lmao
hiding shavol
That dude can't answer the question, lol😅
Yeah keep asking why a million time as if US isn’t hypocritical
he did but this propaganda channel cut him off to avoid showing the US's hypocrisy
@@cheatcoddes Because it's the usual Russian BULLSH!T.
@@richardmarsden5610. Ukraine may lose its statehood unless it enters into talks, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko said.
"The situation is very serious. I believe that if Ukraine fails to enter into negotiations, it will eventually lose its statehood and may cease to exist," he pointed out, addressing the Belarusian People’s Congress.
According to Lukashenko, "this is the best situation to make peace and sign a peace treaty."
The Belarusian president added that his Ukrainian counterpart Vladimir Zelensky should have realistic expectations. According to him, Ukraine now has the most serious and favorable situation for a peace treaty. Lukashenko pointed out that Russian troops have liberated several settlements in Ukraine, but it's "very slow progress." "There is a kind of pressure, as we say. Neither they, the Ukrainians, nor the Russians. It's a stalemate," the head of state said.
According to him, Ukraine now needs to make peace, which is evidenced by the flight of Ukrainians from the country to avoid going to the front. Lukashenko added that men in Ukraine are taken off the streets and often sent directly to the war zone without training.
Return to Istanbul agreements
Lukashenko suggested starting the talks with the Istanbul agreements, a package of agreements that included provisions on neutrality and security guarantees. The Belarusian president noted that these agreements are unlikely to be adopted or form the basis of a peace treaty, but it is possible to start with them.
According to him, the servicemen, heads of Western intelligence services, politicians and heads of state are already publicly saying that "Putin should not win." Lukashenko called such statements "a moment for negotiations" and suggested "playing a draw," urging not to propose solutions such as Vladimir Zelensky's so-called peace formula. This initiative does not take into account Moscow's position; it envisages the complete withdrawal of Russian forces to the 1991 borders and the return to Ukraine of control over the "exclusive economic zone" in the Sea of Azov and the Black Sea.
The Belarusian president pointed out that the Russians today "will not leave Crimea or the eastern regions," so putting forward proposals that are unacceptable for negotiations shows that they are not ready to negotiate.
Africa loves Russia and its people.
No it doesn't. They all want to be in the West.
@@richardmarsden5610. Your most recent troll account needs to come back when it is potty-trained, newborn.
@@richardmarsden5610. as an african we do. name an african country who loves the west lol. in africa, middle east and latin america, anti west views are prevalent.
Okay then why to veto the state of Palestine resolution 😊
This is a question for the USA. On Palestine, the United States vetoed
@@burritosls And the question of nuclear weapons in space concerns Russia, which has every advantage in having them, given that it has many fewer satellites in orbit than the American ones. It's the same reason why, for example, the US would definitely veto any UN resolution banning military bases in foreign territories, even if the host nations agreed to it, because the US has many more military bases abroad than Russia has.
@@trumpforever6706 Even so, what is it? Russia does not support the idea of nuclear weapons in outer space and this is also good for the world. I don't see a problem)
Palestine isn't a state with a regular parliament and President. Why let them in ?
Can we veto their veto with a veto??? 🤔
USA getting taste of their own medicine