I hear you 😀… I tried to focus on the bigger picture which is a speed test, these tests are valid to help you determine which drive is the best fit for you. Thanks for commenting
If your any computer is not equiped with a port usb 3.2 gen 2X2 (I repead gen 2X2) only, don't buy the extreme pro v2. If not, you will use it as a 1050mb speed one... I have had this experience...
Thanks for the video. I have a MacBook Pro 14inch M2 MAX which says it comes with Thunderbolt 4, but in the system info like in the video, it shows as a USB 3.1 bus, and with the 2000MB/s disk, I get read and write speeds ~850MB/s. I dont quite get that.
I made an effort to keep my attention on the overall objective, which is conducting a speed test. These tests hold significance in assisting you to decide which drive is the most suitable for your needs. That being said, I should have paid better attention to details.
Hi, thank you for sharing this interesting video. I have a question that's bugging me. If I connect it to a USB3.1 port for example, is the writing better than the SANDISK Extreme NON Pro? I believe that plugging it into a USB, as there is a bottleneck, there is no writing difference. Right or wrong? Thank you
Thank you for your question. It's important to understand that when you connect an NVMe SSD like the SanDisk Extreme or Extreme Pro to a USB 3.1 port using a USB enclosure or adapter, you will be limited by the maximum speed of the USB interface, which will create a bottleneck. In other words, you won't be able to achieve the maximum read and write speeds of the NVMe SSD. That being said, the SanDisk Extreme Pro has a higher maximum sequential read and write speed than the regular SanDisk Extreme. So, even if you are limited by the USB interface, you may still see some difference in performance between the two models. However, the difference may not be significant enough to justify the higher cost of the Extreme Pro over the regular Extreme, especially if you are using it with a USB interface.
I have a 2017 iMac intel i5. I bought the Sandisk extreme portable v2 and I’m getting about 800mb/s read write. Would I benefit from this? I have usb type c ports but I think usb 2.0 or maybe 3.0? I’m using type c cable now
Thank you for your question. 800mb/s sounds about right. if you are currently using a USB Type-C cable to connect your SanDisk Extreme portable v2 SSD, you should check whether your computer's Type-C port is a Thunderbolt 3 port. If it is not a Thunderbolt 3 port, you may not be able to achieve the maximum speeds of the SanDisk Extreme SSD.
Thank you for your comment. I understand your point but I tried to focus on the bigger picture which is a speed test, that is the main point here, so i think these tests are valid to help you determine which drive is the best fit for you. Now that being said, I should’ve used the same file size to void any confusion.
well it might help for perspective IF you transferred the SAME 44GB file on both SSDs to see the real world time difference. Instead of transferring an almost 1/2 size file on the Pro model with elapsed time, can't compare!! DUH show the elapsed time on the same size file OMG so dumb.
Thanks for commenting. I don’t see why they would not work with the Xbox Series S using the “USB-C to USB-A adapter”. I have an older X-Box one, I am using WD 5TB Spinning disk without any issue.
Looks to me that the MBP will not support the speed of the drive with a 3.1 port as mentioned by @sombatkhruathong829 better off getting the Extreme version and save some $$
SanDisk NVMe 1TB Extreme Portable SSD Up to 1050MB/s
czcams.com/video/kzhZZfQXe-w/video.html&ab_channel=JustDIYTeam
SanDisk 1TB Extreme PRO SSD v2 Gen2x2
czcams.com/video/l9IMdAJRJMo/video.html&ab_channel=JustDIYTeam
Why not same testing 44GB :(
Why you didn’t copy same 44 gb folder to both drives??? Come on man
I hear you 😀… I tried to focus on the bigger picture which is a speed test, these tests are valid to help you determine which drive is the best fit for you. Thanks for commenting
If your any computer is not equiped with a port usb 3.2 gen 2X2 (I repead gen 2X2) only, don't buy the extreme pro v2. If not, you will use it as a 1050mb speed one... I have had this experience...
you are correct. thanks for commenting
Well, my MSI GE 66 does :D
How can you tell if your computer is equipped with USB 3.2 gen 2x2?
@@Chopsidy You can check the manual of your laptop or motherboard.
1050 mbps also 3.2 then how it’s support all computers?
Thanks for this video!
I think there's no clear diff between them.
Thanks for the video. I have a MacBook Pro 14inch M2 MAX which says it comes with Thunderbolt 4, but in the system info like in the video, it shows as a USB 3.1 bus, and with the 2000MB/s disk, I get read and write speeds ~850MB/s. I dont quite get that.
Great Review!!!!
Thank you
Your test was incorrect 😅 you should test the same gb otherwise why bother
Thank you. :D
you compared the time with different size of files?
I made an effort to keep my attention on the overall objective, which is conducting a speed test. These tests hold significance in assisting you to decide which drive is the most suitable for your needs. That being said, I should have paid better attention to details.
Thank you for your effort, really appreciate your work. Keep it up.
Just buy an ACASIS enclosure and a NMME SDD (-like Samsung 980 PRO) and thunderbolt 4.0. You will get 2800 MB/s in a MacBook Pro (M1)
Hi, thank you for sharing this interesting video. I have a question that's bugging me. If I connect it to a USB3.1 port for example, is the writing better than the SANDISK Extreme NON Pro? I believe that plugging it into a USB, as there is a bottleneck, there is no writing difference. Right or wrong? Thank you
Thank you for your question. It's important to understand that when you connect an NVMe SSD like the SanDisk Extreme or Extreme Pro to a USB 3.1 port using a USB enclosure or adapter, you will be limited by the maximum speed of the USB interface, which will create a bottleneck. In other words, you won't be able to achieve the maximum read and write speeds of the NVMe SSD. That being said, the SanDisk Extreme Pro has a higher maximum sequential read and write speed than the regular SanDisk Extreme. So, even if you are limited by the USB interface, you may still see some difference in performance between the two models. However, the difference may not be significant enough to justify the higher cost of the Extreme Pro over the regular Extreme, especially if you are using it with a USB interface.
isn't SandDisk being sued big time for their Pro versions losing files after a few days?
why v2 so slow?
I have a 2017 iMac intel i5. I bought the Sandisk extreme portable v2 and I’m getting about 800mb/s read write. Would I benefit from this? I have usb type c ports but I think usb 2.0 or maybe 3.0? I’m using type c cable now
Thank you for your question. 800mb/s sounds about right. if you are currently using a USB Type-C cable to connect your SanDisk Extreme portable v2 SSD, you should check whether your computer's Type-C port is a Thunderbolt 3 port. If it is not a Thunderbolt 3 port, you may not be able to achieve the maximum speeds of the SanDisk Extreme SSD.
What’s the performance on the M2 Macbook Air?
I don’t have M2 yet but i'll update you when I have one for sure
43.9 gb tuo 1050…….28,6 to 2000…😂😂😂😂
Thank you for your comment. I understand your point but I tried to focus on the bigger picture which is a speed test, that is the main point here, so i think these tests are valid to help you determine which drive is the best fit for you. Now that being said, I should’ve used the same file size to void any confusion.
man, MBP have only 10gbps speed on his USB-C, you can't reach 2000MB/s of Pro model on MBP from Apple...
Yes, exactly. Thanks for commenting.
Con un Sandisk Extreme Portable Ssd 1tb Usb 3.2 Gen 2 1050mb/s. Se puede editar bien un video 4k 50p?
And you calling that what you did the comparison? Such a waste of time.
Thank you for your comment. How can I improve?
well it might help for perspective IF you transferred the SAME 44GB file on both SSDs to see the real world time difference. Instead of transferring an almost 1/2 size file on the Pro model with elapsed time, can't compare!! DUH show the elapsed time on the same size file OMG so dumb.
Sign me up if I can use this with the Xbox Series S.
Thanks for commenting. I don’t see why they would not work with the Xbox Series S using the “USB-C to USB-A adapter”. I have an older X-Box one, I am using WD 5TB Spinning disk without any issue.
is the 2000mbps compatible to acer nitro 515 57?
A quick google search shows that Acer AN515-57-500S has 2 USB Type-C Ports so should be compatible.
Is your PC's usb 3.0 or 3.2?
USB 3.1 Bus speed @1:33. Thanks for commenting.
COMPREI ESSE DE 1T DE 1050, E NAO PASSA DE 260 MB/S , JA TESTEI DE VARIAS FORMAS.
verifique que su computadora admita la velocidad. Mi vieja computadora solo puede subir hasta 300mps.
Eu um nitro 5 da accer pra jogo sendo i7 top . Acredito que não seja not
what a bad review, luckily i skipped all of this useless review
Thank you for your comment. please watch the video without skipping it and let me know what I missed and how I can improve.
Looks to me that the MBP will not support the speed of the drive with a 3.1 port as mentioned by @sombatkhruathong829 better off getting the Extreme version and save some $$
Thank you for your comment.