William F. Buckley Jr. speaking at UCLA 12/7.1964

From the archives of the UCLA Communications Studies Department. Digitized 2013.
The views and ideas expressed in these videos are not necessarily shared by the University of California, or by the UCLA Communication Studies Department.

[@mb23ism]

Thank you.

[@insertnamehere313]

He defends WC conclusions even when faced with actual physical evidence he still defends his/WC conclusions and dilutions like the magic bullet theory but he was shown evidence of the large bullet fragments taken out of Connelly and Connelly went to his grave with more fragments still in him in his left leg so if all those large and small fragments taken out and still in Connelly then how is the bullet so pristine and not missing chunks and smaller fragments? The grains would be wrong as well and just imagine how many or how big the fragments are that was left in Connelly's left leg,this is actually evidence given by MRS BELL from another Parkland doctor as a gift but she turned the fragments over to the FBI,I have alot more other facts and actually physical evidence etc.

[@eashton42]

Am I just imagining the extremely distracting audio artifacts and popping and scratching here, or what? This is, at times, virtually unlistenable.

[@alexmckelvey3768]

I wish I could say otherwise, but Buckley had no moral grounds for an accusation of disingenuousness for Mark Lane, whom he later had on his show. He has a good deal less to say to Lane in person, though he does use the same amateurish allusions he uses here. Brutus? Lee Harvey Oswald? Alas, underwhelming. .

[@budgibson185]

CIA