PROOF Chelsea Are RUINING Football…❌
Vložit
- čas přidán 15. 01. 2023
- Thanks for watching! While you're here, check out my social media channels linked below including the 'WasseemTalksFootball' podcast!
'WasseemTalksFootball' Podcast: open.spotify.com/show/5YTCgrB...
Instagram: / wasseemtalksfootball
TikTok: / wasseemtalksfootball \CZcams: / @wasseemtalks
No copyright intended, all rights go to rightful owners and partnered or included parties. Video created for creativity and enjoyment while being demonitized.
Selective photos used have been credited to Getty Images and the owners of their photos. Display of watermark is shown to provide rights to owners of pictures used. - Sport
First they said Chelsea were finished when the club was sold & now when new owners are spending so much money they say that Chelsea is ruining football.
this hate towards Chelsea will never end. 😂
They’ve spent more in less than a season than Liverpool have the past 5 years. Liver have won everything the past 5 years and chelsea are currently 10 in the prem. just listen to that. They’ve spent over 400 in the past 2 transfer windows and they’re 10th
Chelsea didn't buy first team players with most of that money and Chelsea have always bought 2nd reamers even under Roman, also last season was not an upgrade, it was replacement...if the young kids play well, Chelsea gain more and Everything the creator said about FFP or Mudryk was wrong, it's d same amount with Arsenal. Do Ur research pls
@@senthurananandarat5464 that’s liverpools choice
Leave this bitter people alone😂😂 if it's not yours don't bother to please 😂😂
@@senthurananandarat5464 My good sir, your analogy is totally wrong..... first of all You said the last 5 years for Liverpool, then you use only this season to refer to Chelsea, that's just wrong....Chelsea has won 10 trophies in the last 5 years (Premierleague, champions league, Super cup, etc) so Chelsea has been more successful compared to Liverpool...as For this new season, Liverpool is not doing better than us per see cos we both struggling. Also half of the signings Chelsea has made since Boehly took over are yet to even kick a ball for the club. So please be more objective in your analysis
Americans watch football for 3 days and think they can talk
Fr
you tubers do shoddy research and put them in videos
@@stewart8727 the average fan does no research anyways what's your point
@@coutinihoho7927 hes a you tuber not am average fan. Thats the damn point
Is this guy not British
Lol that's the worst finance lesson ever. That's not how the books work, brother. Chelsea signed Mudryk for 70 mil. But he also signed an 8.5 year contract. Which basically amortizes his transfer fee. That comes up to 8.2 mil a year, plus his wage. Compared to what other clubs do when negotiating player contracts, Chelsea are doing an absolutely brilliant job. It's sad that fans don't see it.
We just gotta hope these 7-8 year contract players dont flop lmao
@@global_rankk if they do we just loan them and it takes care of the wage bill
@@Alex-tn3tq exactly
10th in the league what a joke
@@TROLGUY999 they have alot of injuries 11 players are sidelined
Any team that has many injuries will drop points
You have 0 understanding of how FFP works.. They have amortized the transfer fee over the period of the players contract.
doesnt matter he still has a point, all this lavish spending is just bad for football
@@TROLGUY999 But its not in breach of FFP as highlighted in this videa. They are taking the risk of offering the player a long term contract. Its creative accounting . No different to how Abu Dhabi group sponsors almost everything at City. FFP is so fickle that for example Chelsea sell Murdyk after 3 years for 50m , the whole transfer price is used by Chelsea as revenue for that year whilst still only paying an amortized value as outgoings.
@@TROLGUY999 bad for football or your club is broke 😭
@@aaronnunes4322 well said
He said we need to talk about FFP not that they have broken it. So maybe listen before you speak. The fact you can spend nearly £400 million in two transfer windows and get around it by putting players on a ridiculously long contact to spread the cost is wrong imo. Just ethically and mortally too. You keep paying these fees every team in the PL is going to suffer especially those without the big backing, because Clubs outside PL will not sell. And having players on a 8.5 year/7 year contact is wrong too imo. That's literally almost all their prime playing years.
Wrong in regards to ffp. he spreads the deals out. Last player was on 8 and a half year contract. Educate yourself 1st as you are making yourself look a fool.
There's a huge reason why Todd is in this position because he knows what he's doing, You dont become a billionaire by mistake. That's why we're discussing it all in the comments and he's the one signing the cheque book. People don't know what they're talking about. Chelsea can only do what they can afford, they're not mindless idiots spending money like there's no tomorrow. When you start a business you expect losses in the beginning stages, sometimes its better to do so.
Not by mistake but by cheating, fraud and scandals.
Still on 10th position..
@@Ayam.plastik yeah.
@@Ayam.plastik what do you expect? We win the prem after a week with the signing?
@@Ayam.plastik so? Broski we have a long injury list and u expect us to maintain form?
Financial fair play won't be an issue for Chelsea since they keep offering very long contracts. For example, Mudryk is 80 Million for an 8 year contract, therefore they will only be paying 10 million a year for him
Don't hate on Chelsea. Hate on the fact that UEFA's FFP rules are so weak that they allow transfer fees to be spread over the duration of a player's contract.
I think UEFA are changing the rules from this year thats why Chelsea are in such a role to sign players because they know that in the coming years the FFP rules are going to be much strict....
You can't say Chelsea is finished and then start crying when we are not.
Honestly Chelsea needs to approach new signings in a calmer manner like going in there and thinking it is a bidding war is just gonna wanna make the other team not care to waste their money on the player but you will still end up overpaying for the player even if the rival club is not into the player 😂
Edit 2: 😆 OMG thx for the likes everybody and great videos wasseem
Agreed 🤣
The rival teams were very much into the new players they just got, it was actually a bidding war and they won, don't be bitter about this, they are ahead of most epl teams financially
We should also take into consideration that Chelsea only had two transfer windows in the last 4 seasons.
@@portiphar9375 ahead of which team financially
They ain’t even top three richest team in England
Get your fact and stop saying rubbish
@@rorenzcaeservenaunekaramat8421 and this is one of the reasons for it
Can’t believe you did a whole video about it😂😂
Rivals tears so sweet to drink, cry more
Keep saying tht mate 😂😂.you'll definitely win the championship next year😊
Whose crying now 😅😅😅😅
They're overpaying but they're also building a lot of talented youngsters. No ffp violations either. It's been explained by reputable people.
This comment aged like shit😂😂
Can we limit his internet access please? I’m genuinely concerned he’ll make everyone in the platform dumber, after watching his videos.
Agreed 💯
A recipe for foolishness in person. Has all the hallmarks of it. Talks without thinking stinks harder than the rest.
Exactly bro
Very dumb dude.
Now what dummy???😂😂 Your club definitely ruining football!! £1 fcking billion in only 12 months and still shit😂😂
Man UTD: First Time?
Chelsea: Yeah, and You?
Man UTD: No, No, not my first time
The statement of overpaying is correct, but in recent times all the players are overpriced. Therefore only way to acquire players is to overpay them.
NB: The transfer window is never the same since that Neymar transfer
“Everybody making a video about football, so i should make 1 too” 😂😂😂😂
When we struggle they laugh, and when we try to improve they cry 😂
I’m more upset that the facts Tuchel might be a Spurs manager
@@alexistecca408 yh that too
for sure man, just remind them wat happened to us some seasons back, c how Russian invasion of Ukraine affected Chelsea. now we're team America they are crying, let them cry with their Arabs.
@@wakabisephatia3681 everyone was happy Chelsea was sinking when tuchel said he'd drive the team in a van if it comes to that. Now that Chelsea can spend, it's now a bad thing... The wind of Change is coming, shape up or ship out
@@benaamithamo22 Exactly now we can only hope that it will work out. This Chelsea team is surely the most exciting thing happening in the football world right now
And this, kids, is why you should not talk about something you don't understand shit from.
“70mil just because they were insecure that Arsenal would buy for less”
This channel is satire im guessing?
This is completely misleading. We have only spent like 70m this season as most of the deals are spread out over many years.
as a Chelsea fan I am ashamed of what the club as become...
We went from London Blues to The London Blues.
feel the same
because when there were abromovich and Maria i don’t remember her second name but like she was like director of club so they didn’t do lots of useless transfers almost every chelsea transfer used to be good and not so overpaid and 50-65% times that they sold players they’ve got foot profit so my opinion is don’t give mf american who knows nothing about football buy good club
Funniest Chelsea fan
Geesh that sucks mate.
@@zazaa__zazayeah she bought drinkwater bakayoko papi djilobodji and many countless flops cuadrados , at least we are showing some grit right now , only good transfer window we had was when we bought kai timo hakim mendy chilly all in same window
They ruined what was clearly a good signing for arsenal. I am a Manchester united fan through and through and I wish Arsenal all the best just because they stood their ground and refused to be swindled by Chelsea
I am Liverpool fan but I like Man Utd and Arsenal I wish Arsenal win the Prem over Oil Money
@@Edu23u Cheers even if as a Man United fan myself hoping Klopp turns things around
@@SylvieTheCuteSylveon I'm actually enjoying Man Utd's comeback , I can't wait for the rematch on Sunday , may the best team win!
@@Edu23uArsenal? Okay. But United?! Winning #21? HELL NO. I'd rather have City winning the UCL.
But people hate roman
Has anyone explained to this guy how FFP works the fee is spread out across the length of the contract so we’re basically paying a bit over £10 million a year for Mudryk
You are forgetting Arsenal were going to pay 95 mil for that guy who scored goals in the Ukrainian league
They are in shambles atm, but at least their owner is trying to do something about it.
Goddamn, I really thought a person who has a football channel would actually know how Chelsea is doing this. 🤦♂️
This bro shedding hard tears 🤣🤣
It really does shock and sadden me how uninformed (or potentially biased) some of these channels can be
In the following 2 seasons they can't spend any money on transfers and will be charged by fpp rules if income does not improve/ they don't get international football.
Incorrect
That is not true
they crazy
In every season there should be a cap for 250m as the most u can spend in the 2 transfer windows combined, not including wages. And if any team goes over this amount they are in debt to the organiser for the amount they go over. E.g. Barca spend 255m in the season, they are 5m in debt to the organisers.
As a celtic/scotland fan ive seen mudryk play in person for club and country, he is scary
I like that
No i mean celtic/scotland fan as in club/country, sorry i didnt mean to make it confusing
I’m an Arsenal fan and I’m pissed but Roman sold Chelsea with zero debt. That’s why FFP will allow for new owner to be able to spend whatever. They are bastards but damn gotta respect it
😂😂😂
That isn't why mate. Do some research and stop being salty.
@@southerner6852 how Isit being salty when I literally said gotta respect it? U Wally. Please tell me what it is then since you know so much??
@@oneyourself5322 Roman forgave 1.6 billion of debt, leggaly forced any new owners to invest 1.7 billion in the squad. As confirmed by family in America, boehly and co were already big spenders as can be seen with the Dodgers.
Boehly and co are intelligent enough to understand football finance and offer long contracts whicah protects the asset value of the player.
Under FFP we can spend 150 million a year, so far we've spent around 70 million under even the new rules coming in in 3 years.
Only reason other clubs ain't doing it is because they don't have the funds. Yes we won't do it every season, but my god do we need a new squad and based off of the game today, it's looking positive.
@@southerner6852 leggaly yeah? …. Yeh so he sold it with zero debt. Exactly what I was saying mate …. He didn’t HAVE to reinvest in squad. But fair play to him, he did. He also spent a lot more that 70m. Chelski have always been bid spenders in recent times and I don’t see that slowing down anytime soon, and so it shouldn’t.
I’m ashamed of my club spending habits and they always sign the wrong players 😢
This is not your club
@@dajaylavish6243 lol
The big problem is that they will be screwed with FFP in the summer when they close the loophole 8.5yr contract to off set the fee for longer how many of these players will still be at Chelsea in 2yrs time 🤔🤔
Chelsea be making transfers like I do in fifa lol
Your first like 🤝🏼
If you going to Speak on the transfers they are making atleast do get the all the facts and not those that just help a certain narrative... all these fees you are speaking of are not once off fees and will be broken down across multiple years so that they can appease FFP laws and 2ndly players signed 21 and Under are the considered Youth Transfers and that's a whole other ball game.... Thank You. Chelsea Baby!!!!
^this
Trust Boehly, Potter, and idk anyone else part of that board over there in London.
Someone once said this is good down the track everything will fall into order, more like chaos!
I’ll bet Liverpool win tomorrow. 😂
When you are playing a football manager simulation and then you realize you are in debt like Chelsea, that's crazy
The fee of the signing is spread out over the length of the contract hence why they are dishing out such long contracts
Sounds like my career mode team after I bought Mbappe, Vinicius, Haaland etc
So you think Felix is only gonna play 10 games lmao
Chelsea literally paid the same amount as arsenal 5 million more ???? Did you hear what the shaktar director of football said a couple days ago 😂😂😂
Lmao if accounting was literally this straightforward, there wouldn't be university courses for it.
This is ptsd cuz barca took their signings in the last summer transfer window
Not ruining football anymore than Real Madrid did in the early 2000s and you all loved them for it.
And people have been complaining about Newcastle spending like the hell
Good point
If we looking back, it was Abramovic’s Chelsea that started all this crazy transfer!
If they can afford it then it’s not crazy. Abramovich didn’t start crazy transfers
Boehly doesn’t know what is he doing 😂😂😂😂😂😂
Apparently they’ve done 7 year contracts for some players so they’re not paying all the money at once, still can’t see them finishing any higher than 5th
I cbf to explain it fully there’s a good explanation by Younes Talks Football on how FFP works but pretty much they’re in a good position with FFP and their transfers due to how long the contracts they’re giving to new signings are, and that FFP deals with transfers annually, transfer fee div. by contract length (ex 50m on a 5 year deal=10m per year). Mudryk signed an 8.5 year deal for a 70m fee, therefore making him cheaper than a 50m 5 year player in the eyes of FFP
chelsea is a good team but they are unlucky this season due to the injuries...
So you not going to mention how we have by far the worst injury crisis in world football? How literally 10 players who all can start and some are literally top 5 in the world at their position are out? We need to sign. Our team is frankly ruined by these injuries so we have to buy more players.
Like how in like 2019 or 2020 I forgot, they were having the opposite having been banned from signing any new players and had to use so many youngsters that actually are doing pretty decent like mason mount. Funny part of that in 2021 they would go on to win the champions league. 😂
Barcelona for coutnho umtiti dembele girezman arthur and e de jong played 500 or 600 milion then they bankrupt and signed players for 200 milion this season
We signed them for 6/7/8 years so per season for each player is a around 10-15 millions, and we do that bcs at the moment we have a lot of injured players
Chelsea is the new Man United with all of that overpaying😂
FFP is based on the Profit and Loss of the team, so the transfer fees are deprecated over the life of the contract, hence everyone on 8 year deals only costing 8-10 million a season! Cash outflows can just be subsidised by the oweners
Arsenal were offering the same €100M as Chelsea Dfkm😭😂
Enzo: Hold my beer
Chelsea is like fifa manager mode
Todd def knew what he aas doing haha 😅
You forget the fact that we are trying to sell 3-star players and also we got a refund of 190 million from the premier league in damages.
My guy is stressing hahaha
The same chaps said this about city , ruin football. Do you know what ruining football would look like!
another problem with this is that it blows up the market if Chelsea buy these sort of players for those prices then other clubs expect those king of prices for their players which some clubs just cant afford
When a team gets a new owner(like chelsea did) they have like 1 or 2 seasons(I am not sure if it is one or two) where they can spend as much as they want
Imagine paying all that money for players and still struggle to get into the Europa league.
Chelsea buy average players for ridiculous prices. Poor manager too.
I dey pain you 😂
I didn't see you post on the time we won only one outta 10 games
FIFA changed the rules because of it, Chelsea were giving players 8 year deals so the net spending for each year wouldn’t go over the limit. Example: A £75 million player is given a 8 year contract meaning per year it’s only worth 9 million. It’s a loop hole that they’ve found that’s why they’ve bought some many players on crazy wages, contracts and prices in this window alone
Newcastle: how the fuck you dodging FFP man 🌝
This is the future of the prem, but get use to it and not get left behind. This is facts.
Chelsea have no debt before now, Chelsea was banned for 2 seasons without signing, So signing extravagance is a welcome development.
Chelsea bought a bunch of second tier players for ridiculous money: Gallagher, Cole Palmer, Jackson, Cucurella, Sanchez, all average. Imagine if they invest wisely and get Nico Williams, Mancini, Mitrovic, Milinkovic-Savic, Rabiot, Leão, Bono... Now we'd have a contender.
You need to get balance and perspective. Have you asked why CFC are going mental in the transfer market ? The FIFA fair play rules kick in next season, so we`re getting business done quick and early. Dont forget this is a new era at the famous CFC, weve a stale squad left over from previous managers, And Boehly means business, weve set up a global scouting network, are working on satellite clubs, and have signed up some top talent behind the scenes. This is a rebuilding project and will take time and patience, but its only bad for football if your not a CFC fan isnt it ??? This is unprecedented i agree, but there is a clear plan and strategy from CFC, that all of this now is for a more sustainable future, so yes its a gamble, but a gamble well worth taking in my view. We`re building a squad of top young talent and with the experience in the side over the next 12 months this squad can grow,learn from and about each other, gel together and build a real team spirit, It reminds me of when Abramovich bought CFC and many were saying the same thing then, only to be proved wrong. Just have some balance and perspective about CFC at the moment. KTBFFH
Roman had in contract had to invest 500mil in players when he sold club
Chelsea have spend as many money this year that liverpool has over the last 15 years and some of the liverpool signings where Salah, Van dijk, Mane, Alisson, Robertson, Firmino, Sturridge, Thiago, Fabinho, Nunez, Jota, Diaz
Chelsea have a net spend this year more than what Newcastle United was sold for last year..... 😳
Chelsea have a NET spend more in the last 6 months than Liverpool have since 2018 up till now
I didn’t hear half the video. When he started talking about overpaying for transfers I thought he was talking about Man Utd
Chelsea is proof a combination of superstars is good, but a team is definitely better.🙏
Newcastle United and Arsenal have proven this this season (I can add Man U into the mix as of late)
They way they made Contract is not what we think. They do business not just watch football.
Bro started watching football yeasterday
Well if you had any idea of how football accounting, amortisation and ffp actually works then you'd understand why Chelsea is able to spend so much.
Now the net spend of 368 is going to reduce with Chelsea to get a couple of players of the books before the end of the window. But even if we look at the current figure, most of the deals have been signed at about 7 years which puts it at 57 m a year
The market has been disrupted multiple times and there are some people who always up in arms about the kind of money that is being spent in a sport.
That’s just what he does AND IT WORKS
Giants we’re a dynasty in the division with the Dodgers and he ended it with a similar strategy to this
Yea but when they put the players on long term deals it is less per year they’re paying. They are also having the bank pay the team and then paying the bank back in increments
Bros just playing career mode💀
Due to amortisation chelsea will pay 63 million euros per year as the transfer free is spread out across the full contract length. The average contract length for them is 6.5 years. So considering 56 million is their annual income, they are in a deficit of 11 to 15 million euros IF THEY AVOID TO OVER SPENDING.
Edit: Bruh another 120 mil on Enzo fernandez 💀 now its getting outta hand
show me someone that lack knowledge about football, I see this
Bro playing career mode in real life
The moment they let the British government chase away Abramovich the writing was on the wall.
Then they fired Tuchel and hired a nobody.
It's not so much the senseless signings ,but there's a feeling of Chelsea's identity going the way of Man Utd and dare I say most of medern football
Bro fck your oppion you looking at it from one sode only , are you looking at the potential success, ambition is priceless bro ... N todds willing ness to make this club great cannot be undoubted... As a chelsea fan i know most clubs wuld cry for this investment
Yet its OK for psg to spend 350 million on 2 players
I feel your pain bro,it's not gonna end ,cry more
I smell jealousy.
jealous of that sweet 10th?
The mudryk one is crap. The fee offered was the exact same as arsenal, it’s just the payments are offered in a different time frame. Arsenal offered 70+30 as well
I mean as an arsenal supporter I have to admit they found a solid loophole in the system which will definitely be amended by the 2024 season BUT surely this is not a sustainable practice under Bohly ESPECIALLY since he’s overpaying for almost all of these players to begin with AND they are not getting European competition this season. It’s a massive risk and there are way too many variables like the players liking their wages and not wanting to leave OR the new guys not being worth nearly as much and being sold for a major loss. Under abromavic they barely ever turned a profit so time will tell!
they signing top young players for the long term but to fix the short term situation, they're on long contracts. I'll never understand the hate