@@ParthPatel-no7kc It’s not just how many goals you score, but how you score them. Pele was more versatile when it came to goal scoring compared to Puskas as he could score many types of goals and majority of his goals came from dribbling a defender. However, CR7 and Messi have got to be the greatest goal scorers ever because they broke all the past legend’s records and became two of the highest scorers in history in the hardest era of football. Football is much faster and harder to play in now, so CR7 and Messi would easily dominate the olden era of football. Eusebio is very underrated, he’s more skilled than Pele and scored 580 goals in 575 games for club. He was very fast and athletic and was like the R9 of the 60s.
@@McFlashh y Cuantos marcaria Pelé o Eusebio en nuestra época? tenian el talento, el físico y la regularidad de sobras para marcar todos los goles que quisiersen pero con balones menos pesados, campos en mejores condiciones, arbitraje mas controlado y mejor preparación física. Yo digo qie que el fútbol de ahora es más facil que el de antes
I don't get why people say he was such an elegent and techinical gifted striker. I just watched over 100 goals from him and there was maybe one technical brilliant goal. If anything, he was extremely clinical. But that's not something bad by any means. I like his attitude. He always had the goal and winning in mind, that's a very good attitude. Even when he got slide tackled, he would just continue to strive for the goal. Nowadys most players would have gone for the penalty.
What are you on about? The third clip alone with the drag back absolutely sells the defender shows what kinda of technical ability people are talking about on a dreadful pitch with a heavy leather ball in heavy leather boots
That is exactly the one single technical goal I was refering to. You didn't read my comment properly did you? You just wanted to get angry. The funny thing is, I've found interviews from player around that time like Pele who indeed confirmed that he was a clinical striker. He once again an exagerrated legend, hyped up to be better than he was by people who never actually saw him play. His statistics certainly confirm that he was a phenomenal striker. But he doesn't seem to be as technical brilliant as people who never even saw him play claim. But who knows. You might be around 90 years old an can properly recollect having seen him play right?@@ralphportland
@@pandaman1331Contrary to what many kids believe, technique doesn't mean just dribbling. There is also technique in the way a player strikes the ball. In many of these clips you can see that his shot technique was way ahead of his time, similar to the way modern era strikers play.
I also always wonder where people get this footage from. There are a lot of compilations on CZcams but barely any highlights or full matches. But someone has to have gotten these videos before uploading them right? I'm sure they still exist. The question is if we can get our hands on them. Would be awesone to watch highlights from the white ballet.
@@buffon550 Puskás is better at Striker but Di Stefano's impact on field was better. Di Stefano was the playmaker & Puskás was the finisher. I have never thought about comparing Di Stefano with Puskás as their role was different & they used to play together in Real Madrid & they used to be the best attacking duo in Europe at that time. But tbh I am a huge Puskás fan but Di Stefano is slightly better.
![Alfredo Di Stefano ● Best Goals/Skills [Rare Footage]](/img/n.gif)
One of my favorite players in history Puskas 👑🤩
The music 🤦🏻♂️
Buen video
Great video! Would you say Puskas was a better goal scorer than CR7, Messi, Pele or Eusebio? And where did you get this footage from?
Imo Pelé is the only one that can be argued to be a better goalscorer than Puskas.
@@ParthPatel-no7kc It’s not just how many goals you score, but how you score them. Pele was more versatile when it came to goal scoring compared to Puskas as he could score many types of goals and majority of his goals came from dribbling a defender. However, CR7 and Messi have got to be the greatest goal scorers ever because they broke all the past legend’s records and became two of the highest scorers in history in the hardest era of football. Football is much faster and harder to play in now, so CR7 and Messi would easily dominate the olden era of football. Eusebio is very underrated, he’s more skilled than Pele and scored 580 goals in 575 games for club. He was very fast and athletic and was like the R9 of the 60s.
@@McFlashh la era más dura del futbol?
@@McFlashh y Cuantos marcaria Pelé o Eusebio en nuestra época? tenian el talento, el físico y la regularidad de sobras para marcar todos los goles que quisiersen pero con balones menos pesados, campos en mejores condiciones, arbitraje mas controlado y mejor preparación física. Yo digo qie que el fútbol de ahora es más facil que el de antes
You present an arguement but not facts@@McFlashh
6:52 que mierda??? en ese partido solo hizo puros golazos, aparte más de un gol suyo habría sido premiado con el premio Puskas jojojojo
I don't get why people say he was such an elegent and techinical gifted striker. I just watched over 100 goals from him and there was maybe one technical brilliant goal. If anything, he was extremely clinical. But that's not something bad by any means. I like his attitude. He always had the goal and winning in mind, that's a very good attitude. Even when he got slide tackled, he would just continue to strive for the goal. Nowadys most players would have gone for the penalty.
What are you on about? The third clip alone with the drag back absolutely sells the defender shows what kinda of technical ability people are talking about on a dreadful pitch with a heavy leather ball in heavy leather boots
That is exactly the one single technical goal I was refering to. You didn't read my comment properly did you? You just wanted to get angry. The funny thing is, I've found interviews from player around that time like Pele who indeed confirmed that he was a clinical striker. He once again an exagerrated legend, hyped up to be better than he was by people who never actually saw him play. His statistics certainly confirm that he was a phenomenal striker. But he doesn't seem to be as technical brilliant as people who never even saw him play claim. But who knows. You might be around 90 years old an can properly recollect having seen him play right?@@ralphportland
@@pandaman1331Contrary to what many kids believe, technique doesn't mean just dribbling. There is also technique in the way a player strikes the ball. In many of these clips you can see that his shot technique was way ahead of his time, similar to the way modern era strikers play.
@@pandaman1331 It’s your right to be stupid.
Footbal is easier now. Lightweight boots,ball,strip. Red yellow cards ,5 subs,no tackles,perfect playing field,players with less ability.
football is easier now 🤓 warra defending at 3:04 😂😂😂
Where did you find all these footage?
youtube
I also always wonder where people get this footage from. There are a lot of compilations on CZcams but barely any highlights or full matches. But someone has to have gotten these videos before uploading them right? I'm sure they still exist. The question is if we can get our hands on them. Would be awesone to watch highlights from the white ballet.
@@pandaman1331 what is white ballet?
652
Puskas>>>di stefano and cruyff?
not for me
@@cristianopuskas6980 ok
Puskás > Cruyff but Di Stefano was something else. Di Stefano's impact on the field was higher than Puskás. But Puskás is GOATed Striker
@@abhiseksarkar1369 So puskás>>>Cruyff but di Stefano>>>puskas?
@@buffon550 Puskás is better at Striker but Di Stefano's impact on field was better. Di Stefano was the playmaker & Puskás was the finisher. I have never thought about comparing Di Stefano with Puskás as their role was different & they used to play together in Real Madrid & they used to be the best attacking duo in Europe at that time. But tbh I am a huge Puskás fan but Di Stefano is slightly better.