Minx Of Madness World Record
Vložit
- čas přidán 28. 05. 2024
- This is the minx of madness, it has 5993 moving parts and weighs over 10KG. It was printed on desktop FDM 3d printers over the course of 2 months.
You can find the Anycubic Kobra at
Official store: bit.ly/37ZvN1j
Amazon store: amzn.to/3sdwHhA
A big thank you to Polymaker for providing all the filament used in this project.
You can find their filament here: us.polymaker.com?aff=41
Solving 250 Rubik's Cubes BLINDFOLDED (WORLD RECORD): • Solving 250 Rubik's Cu...
If you are interested in buying this puzzle, or have any other business inquiries please email me at: corenpuzzle@gmail.com
0:00 Intro
1:25 Turning
2:07 Number of permutations
4:23 Tools and materials used
5:37 Scrambling - Zábava
I feel like this is the one cube where taking it apart and reassembling it would be faster than solving it.
Idk
Idk
Definitely
3x3 cube is faster to disassemble and reassemble than solving for non-cubers
Idk
Honestly, every turn is probably the only time that permeutatiom will ever exist
Its the same for a 3x3x3 cube. Since it has 43,252,003,274,489,856,000 permutations
well except for when it's close to being solved as the almost solved permutations would appear more often.
@@YoureASquidYoureAKid but even so with how many and how many times people have cubes I’m sure some permutations have been repeated
The same is true every time you properly shuffle cards
The real question is is it easier to make it ot ssolve it?
Even 1 year later he’s still solving it. That is what I call commitment!
We ain't gettin pinned. He moved on.
At this point I bet he's just re-applying stickers.
The mix of tiny square pieces, stretched out long pieces, and big middle pieces almost make the puzzle look glitched out when scrambled. Thats my favorite thing about it, honestly
It looks like Reddit
Actually the diffferent sized pieces eliminates a lot of possibliities compared to all of them being the same size that would have allowed puzzle to scrammbled into. - Richard.
@@user-xf2my3hq8xok Richard
we finally getting closer to "the longer you scramble it - the harder it is to solve"
i think we've passed that milestone just from this.
Well considering that once you get past 25 moves on a regular rubik's cube you start solving it, in this case the halfway point is some near astronomical number.
@@MetricJester that assumes every random move made took you further away from solved
@@me_fault you cannot make something beyond 'perfectly randomized' there is a limit to the amount of information stored on the cube while still being usable, the big one has a much higher capacity but still has this limit
let me put it another way
if you make a random move in an attempt to make the cube a further number of moves away from solved, how do you know you haven't inadvertently reduced the number of moves away from solved
The scrambled puzzle looks like the Tesseract from Interstellar! So beautiful and mindbending.
First to reply yay
I’m trying to get Tingman’s attention
@@x2y7 😁
what's the difference?
@@teaperm3549 oooo
When I was about 10 the Rubik's cube came out in the UK in around 1980....it was a sensation...everyone had one...I taught myself to solve it and really enjoyed spending hours with it.
Fast forward to 2022 and I would probably still be trying to solve this one if it came out in 1980!!
Legend has it he's still trying to solve it to this day
I love the idea that a super computer would try to render this and immediately explode
The reality is a computer. We live in the matrix
It wouldn't though.
If it tried to render every possible permutation though it would definitely freeze up before it got even a fraction of the way.
@@kamikeserpentail3778 🤓
@@hydroxide5507 "🤓"🤓
@@thesoftone ""🤓"🤓 "🤓
Wow using the demon core to create an extreme puzzle is wild
yea
i knew i aint the 1st one to think that
Well if it was a demon core it would be made of metal
gets screwdriver
screwdriver about to make the whole thing explode
It’s been a year since this was posted…
I think he’s still solving this puzzle today!
I came to say the same thing.
At 2:36, here's what the mess in the denominator means.
Firstly, it's important to define the difference between a permutation and a combination. With permutation the order (or placement) is important while with combinations it's not. So, for example, if a teacher from a class of 20 is picking two class representatives and chooses Albert and Brian, it's the same thing as choosing Brian and Albert so the different number of combinations is (20/2) * 19 = 190 (with the 2 in the denominator since the first representative chosen can be in two different spots). Now, if the teacher is choosing a president and vice president- choosing Albert for president and Brian for vice president is different than choosing Brian for president and Albert for vice president so the number of permutations is 20*19 = 380.
To explain the denominator in the equation in the video, let's start with a Gigaminx. The face on a Gigaminx has a center pentagon, a middle ring and an outer ring (i.e., the edge). We're going to focus on the middle ring of one face and ignore the center pentagon and outer ring. The middle ring has five diamond shaped pieces and five trapezoid shaped pieces. Since placement of each diamond shaped piece doesn't make a difference, a solver can place the first diamond in five places, the second one in four places, the third one in three places, the fourth one in two places and the last one is forced into the remaining spot. So, there are 5*4*3*2*1 = 5! = 120 ways for the diamonds on the first face to be placed (all of which are correct in a solved Gigaminx). Similarly, there are 5! = 120 ways (again, all of which are correct) for the trapezoid pieces to be placed when solving the first face. So, with twelve faces there are twelve sets of diamonds and twelve sets of trapezoids for a total of 24 sets. With n = 2 for a Gigaminx we have 12*n*(n-1) = 12*2*(2-1) = 24 which is the 24 sets. And that's where the exponent of 24 comes from for the 5! in the denominator.
Using other values of n: for n = 1 (a typical Megaminx) the exponent is 0 which makes the denominator 1 as expected since there's no user discretion where to place any piece (i.e., every single piece will be in the exact same spot when it's solved). For n = 2 (a Gigaminx) I showed above that the exponent is 24. For n = 3 (a Teraminx) the exponent is 72 as there are 6 different sets of pieces, on each of the 12 faces, that can be in five different locations each (0 in the innermost layer - the middle pentagon, 2 in the next layer, 4 in the next layer and 0 in the next layer - the edge). For n = 4 (a Petaminx) the exponent is 144 as there is one more ring than a Teraminx and each subsequent ring has 2 more pieces that can be in any of 5 places and (2+4+6) *12 = 144.
Finally, for n = 10 (does it even have a name?) the exponent in the denominator is 1,080 (12*10*(10-1) = 1,080.
Note that if each piece was numbered and had to go in a specific spot the exponent in the denominator would be 0.
🥴
🥴
Damn
Beat it,nerd.
thanks dad that was really helpful. could you explain how the function of n in the exponent of the denominator is derived?
As someone who has never solved a regular Rubix Cube, this just makes me cry in fear XD
I've been working on my fun little 2x2 for like 6 years now only ever been able to solve 3 colors. Don't feel bad though I can't tell you how many times I've been shamed by people for being " too stupid to solve the easiest Rubix cube on the planet"
@@shadowsfall42 💀💀💀
I get you there, I’ve been trying to solve this 1x1 Rubix cube for a decade, damn near impossible…
@@lmccord2995 i feel you too bud, but i just dont get why i cant solve the 0x0, like its so unsolvable and ive been trying to solve it everyday, and still to this day and i've been at it FOR YEARS
*same*
“How many possible ways are there to scramble this puzzle”
Me: “TOO many.”
“8.6x10^7924 possible ways.”
Me: “Like I said. TOO MANY!”
NOT ENOUGH
Theres more than 86 duomilli-sescentillion (the 2600th -illion), ways to scramble it
@@magicalunicorn1296hello. I am aware of the fact that when naming powers of 1000 there are prefixes used in the words such as quadragin and nonagin and millia (I am quite fascinated with it, and I’ve been on the first 10000 powers of 10 website). However, I have yet to find a website that includes names for much larger numbers, like up to powers of a million. Do you have any? Or is there a rule you have to follow when naming them?
@@zzztriplezzz5264
czcams.com/video/tP-pvo7N5ks/video.html
vidoe
Infinity.....
So ready for that solved video! The dedication is wild!
Legends say he's still solving it to this day.
He was so busy wondering wether or not he could he never stopped to ask himself if he should. He’s warping the fabric of reality around him.
Just one thing: you never mentioned how many layer this has.
Edit: just counted, this is a 21x21 minx. That’s impressive great job!
This, if it was named after the prefixes of -byte words... Would be a god damn chonky hecka' bigass mindbreaking groundsmashing ENDECAMINX. Holy mother of Joseph...
@@ImScor327 It's named with Metric prefixes, but if it was, then there will be not enough prefixes! In fact, you will need to invent 3 new prefixes to name it!
@@scratchthecatqwerty9420 actually, just found out that you only need to invent one! Bronto- and geop- are units as well! Wtf
P.D.: They are not SI units, but they're the most acceptable ones along with "hellabyte" as a substitute for "brontobyte"
@@ImScor327 undecaminx*
@@pawfectdogs4629 guess spanish and english prefixes are different depending on which... It's endeca for me but anyways, still meaning 11 here
This guy is honestly underrated
The amount of precision this need is unbelievable
I'd leave it scrambled, and just admire it. Phenomenal creation.
Insane video, well produced, it was entertaining all the way through and I cannot believe you’re actually solving it! My guess is 70 hours 😬
E
Ye
didn't expect to see you here do you like cubing too?
wunba = cuber?
Wumba Likes cubing btw i am subed to both of these channels
This looks like a beautiful piece of art 🖼️
Guy:What do you you do for a living?
corenpuzzle: I make Rubik’s cubes.
Guy: Oh, that’s cool
core puzzle: HUGE ONES.
As someone with no talent for these sorts of puzzles, I'm going to go out on a limb and say 3 years... due in part, to the sheer amount of possibilities and irl getting in the way of solving time.
As someone who has only solved a 3X3 2 times I’d say at least 2 years
It's not even about knowing how to solve it. It's about the sheer size of this thing lmao. I take 2 weeks to solve my 8x8x8, this will take like 6 months for someone of his skill.
I would say januari 2023
Try not being able to solve a 2x2 for 6 years... this is the pain I carry everyday.
Honestly, if he spends about 8 hours a day on the puzzle, he could probably finish it in less than a week.
The fact he did this all from a 3D printer is insane. Plus it has stickers. Way to go man!
i used to get irritated when my 3x3 would lose a sticker... just imagine the anger that would incite on a rubik's that has more possible permutations that suns in the observable universe
The stickers could easily be done on a Cricut.
A couple days ago I saw a 3d printed nerf gattling gun that could shoot 500 darts in 9 seconds, at this point I wouldn't be surprised if I read on the news that someone robbed a bank by tunneling under the vault with a 3d printed driveable mega drill.
I wonder why he didn't just print everything in different colors. Sounds far easier than applying all those stickers, and, more importantly, there's no chance of one falling off.
@@djalexander968 not just stars in the observable universe... PARTICLES in the observable universe.
If I'm going to die in my sleep by getting smashed to death by 616 meteorites, then I officially blame this video for my death.
“ a 1 in 8.6x10^7924 that tonight a meteor will come hurting through the atmosphere and come smashing your bed”. Just what I needed to fall asleep
After doing some research, This would technically be called the Vundaminx.
Mega - 3
Giga - 5
Tera - 7
Peta - 9
Exa - 11
Zetta - 13
Yotta - 15
Xona - 17
Weka - 19
Vunda - 21
Now if only we could see a Lumaminx...
where did you get these names from?
@@SuB-mt6nv prefixes for data units its one of the first few results on google
@@ericwu6571 thanks
@American Mapper
luma - 23
lotta -25
But what about the varieties of kilominx?
Congrats on finishing this! Must feel amazing. Can’t believe you’re actually trying to solve it lol. I’ll wager a guess of 55 hours over the course of a few weeks
Also thanks for the shoutout :)
if this becomes mass produced, do multiblind with it
i think it will be 70+ hours
I think it could be 48 hours
Really fun project. Easily as much fun as testing how long it takes for each stubbed toe to stop throbbing, dependant upon the order they are stubbed in.
WOW, seriously!!!!! Amazing!!!!!
I thought the Atlasminx was recent. Impressed that you surpassed it relatively quickly compared to how often such "size records" are broken. Pleasantly surprised to see the Moyu-styled multi-tiered mechanism. A proven way to get both stability and smoothness, as shown by the big Meilongs and the Moyu 21x21.
every time i think coren's reached the limit, he just pulls out another one of these.
this is absolutely incredible, your dedication is amazing. congrats on this huge accomplishment!
Looks really cool as a decoration piece for a lamp or a base when it's not solved, I could never solve it anyway.😱
Psychiatrist - so, how can i help you ?"
patient - " minx of madness, minx of madness"
doctor - i'm sorry what ?"
patient - MINX OF MADNESS!"
Those were some really interesting analogies lol
hi kewbix im a great fan
I'm fan
kewbix how long do you think it will take to solve my guess is 80+ hours
Big fan kewbix
Big fan
Just having the puzzle sitting on your desk scrambled makes it a pretty awesome piece of art 👍
"Your heart beats faster, as you turn the minx of madness."
I think it looks really good scrambled as a decoration and art piece
The 21x21 rubiks cube takes 5-6 hours to solve, but the 21x21 version of a megaminx will take around 3 days is my guess. Especially since it's a lot more difficult to turn, and megaminxes take a lot longer to solve.
I know you’ll be here
My God
I’m a guy
I’ll be
gh
Ed
Fffcx
Gff
No
Hoho
Okay
What
Honestly I feel like it'll take at least a year to truly solve this monster
You know the math is serious when the numbers got exclamation marks.
Rumor has it he's still solving it a year later.
This is completely insane. I am so happy I stumbled upon this. This really pushes the limits of consumer 3d printing. I am still impressed by printed 2x2 and 3x3s, much less this behemoth! Incredible work.
My guess for the time is: 76 hrs
Still easier to turn than a rubik's branded cube
LOL
This is bananas!
Listen: publish this towards well known minds like yourself and challenge people to solve it. You could be the guy who makes this a worldwide phenomenon. People from all over the world come to try to solve the unsolvable puzzle hehe
i have never seen any content abt Rubik's cube before and still got very entertained and engaged by this video, so props for your wonderful work! both in regards to puzzle designing and videomaking. I'll definitely stick around now lol
I’m just so mindblowned you managed to pull this off. This Is such an amazing design!!! I’m just speechless the amount of effort you put into making this a reality!
Looks fun
Look at this absolute unit of a puzzle
I'm not sure if your wrists will last long enough to solve it. Tens of thousands of turns and reorientations on a 10kg puzzle is hard work!
Well now I'm getting worried that your next record will beat the part count of the 33x33x33 haha ! That being said you beat the sticker count ! Well done man, always a pleasure to see you push the FDM envelope further and further !
This is insane!!
Evil scientist: "Behold! The Minx of Madness! *thunder cracks *evil laughter
Schmoe: "Neat, hammer time." *smash
Scientist: "Wait, hold on-"
I wouldn't have guessed you could actually solve it 😯 That will be cool to see. That's a real piece of art you made there man! Thanks for sharing the video 🥰
That's a really impressive 3d print build. And omg does it give me anxiety just looking at it scrambled.
very good printer it seems
i cant wait to have my sleep interrupted by 616 meteorites.
1 year 8 months 27 days 18 hours 56 minuits 22 seconds 44 milaseconds.
Incredible work! Watching the assembly was super satisfying. It's crazy to me how well it seems to turn as well. My guess is 80 hours of pure solving time, although obviously you will be taking many breaks in between.
I didn't expect the video to have the part where it's being assembled! With how insane it looked, I thought the entire video was just about solving it. I'm blown away with this puzzle. My guess is 250 hours in the course of months because self-care is important lol Glad to see people with their passions. I'm definitely watching the solving video.
The denominator is to eliminate permutations that are only distinguished by overall orientation - that is, permutations that are identical save that the whole thing is rotated on an axis.
As soon as I saw that equation, I knew that number would be on that order. Factorials scale up very, _very_ quickly.
You created the mix of madness
In order to become insane, you must have been sane in the first place. Coren; you're a wonderful human being and I have loved every puzzle you have made.
This man stared directly into the abyss and his body started moving on its own until this accursed artifact was complete. That's the only reason I can think of why someone would create this
Legend says he’s still solving it
This is madness!
1 year for an experienced solver... and that's it. No one else, is unscrambling that.
Yeah it's been 9 months, still not solved
ummm, 200 hours. Fantastic job! The larger minxes aren't harder to solve from a solution perspective. But the weight of that puzzle, the sheer volume of turns it is going to take and the constant possibility of popping pieces out while still unsolved (I cringe at that possibility -- man). Just building it is staggeringly impressive. That is a serious synthesis of tech and art.
My puny brain cant even begin to comprehend anything in this video.
I'm no math expert but when you put exclamation points in that mathematical equations my brain goes hmmm must be scary big number... yes... number be big!
Me trying to solve it when I was 10: this is gonna be easy!
999 year old me: done!
I SHUDDERED TO DEATH WHEN I SAW IT!!! also, the exoskeleton of it looks nice.
Masterpiece
Torture in 1525: Pulled apart by horses.
Torture in 2025:
My guess is 87 hours. Can't wait to see it solved again!
Your engineering skills are incredible! How did you get inspired to build things like this? I’m going to guess 73 hours and 24 minutes.
My guess is 89 hours and 24 minutes. Great job on the build and assembly.
Dude hasn't posted in a year because he's still trying to solve this beast
Not much into solving them but they are hella fun to build, a few of my cubing friends have me build their stuff and honestly I love it xD
This is nothing short of incredible
"how long will I take to solve?"
13 years.
I could solve this relatively quickly: Remove, and then reapply all the stickers! Hahaha! Seriously though, it really amazes me what humans can come up with when they set their minds to it! Just incredible! ❤
Incredible!
Humans are making rubik's cubes larger until theyre unplayable
Bigger cubes/other twisty puzzles aren't harder, they just take longer. Once you know the method for the lower order ones, like say a 5x5 minx aka a gigaminx, then you use the same method for this as you would foe the gigaminx. There's just more of it. It's why buying the speedcubes over a certain size gets a bit pointless. Like, a 9x9 cube is not at all harder than a 7x7 cube. It just takes longer. So it can turn into a chore with some of these ridiculously oversized puzzles, you might solve them once ever, and then that's about it.
My guess is he filmed the maths after he solved the cube to feel better about the solve time 😂
Legend has it he’s still solving it
Dude's conjuring a Rasengan by the end lol
Are you actually kidding me, I thought that the Atlasminx would be the limit but you’ve managed to prove me wrong.
Congrats on making this puzzle but I can’t believe you actually scrambled it lol
Incredible! I would say 4-5 days to solve the puzzle.
21x21 dodecahedron. Impressive!
I’ve never been so afraid of meteorites striking me
In bed
While I’m sleeping
Tonight
Genuine question, would it have been easier to make this puzzle stickerless rather than sticker it by hand? I mean, i know it would make piece design atleast a little harder for the edge/corner pieces, but if you didn't have to sticker all the tiny center piece it probably would've been easier right? Especially since you can just put a different color filament in the printer and you're good to go. Idk just my random thought.
just like paint a whole side it's big enough
Considering that several pieces contain more than one color of sticker, they way he did it seems easier to me
The Teratominx sounds like a fitting name for this, because it's a MONSTER.
Bem facinho.
Как круто крутится. У меня нет слов, это самое крутое, что я видел за последний год!
Yup that's right
Да, чувак, эта штука огромная!
Да внатуреб
dear god... i wouldnt wish the solving of this puzzle upon my greatest enemies, let alone the set up.
If you recorded how you scrambled the puzzle, you already have the solution.
Thats alot of effort
Hard one: ill go with a safe guess of 74 hours, 35 minutes, 58 seconds and 176 milliseconds. Great video!