Video není dostupné.
Omlouváme se.
Darwin's theory of Evolution: A REALLY SIMPLE and Brief Explanation
Vložit
- čas přidán 14. 08. 2024
- Darwin's theory of Evolution states: "Evolution is the net change in organisms or a population over the span of many generations.”
This change in organisms or populations happens through DNA mutations and reconbination and is passed down to the next generation through reproduction.
In this video we tackle what is evolution and address what people misunderstand about evolution and how it happens. So, here’s a compressed crash course on evolution - from the mutations and recombinations in the DNA which create diversity to environmental factors like natural selection and genetic drift.
#science #animation #evolution
Table of content:
Intro: 0:00
What is Evolution: 0:16
DNA, Heritability and Change: 0:50
Natural Selection and Genetic Drift: 3:25
Speciation: 5:48
Conclusion: 7:18
References:
online.duke.ed...
evolution.berk...
www.nature.com...
www.nature.com...
Illustrations Credit: shutterstock.com
Sound Effects: elements.envato.com
If you wish to buy/license this video, please write to us at admin@scienceabc.com.
Voice Over Artist: John Staughton ( www.fiverr.com... )
SUBSCRIBE to get more such science videos!
/ @scienceabc
Follow us on Twitter!
/ abc_science
Follow us on Facebook!
/ sciabc
Follow our Website!
www.scienceabc...
I dont get how you guys are not getting more views, the quality of the videos are comparable to kurzgesagt. I've only watched a couple of videos and so far I'm amazed! I subscribed instantly after seeing the video of how a chopper rotor works.Keep up the good stuff!
Wow, thank you! We are overwhelmed by your comment. We will surely try our best to keep you entertained.
@@Scienceabc I took this channel too seriously... I'm just discovering you consider this presentation as entertainment, not for educational use...
Here is what I see has happened to many who have been seduced by Darwinism. You were taught certain fundamental truths as a youth. You were instructed in the sciences, in mathematics, physics, geography, history and biology by teachers whom you respected as a youth, whom you admired and looked up to. And because as an impressionable youth you admired, respected and looked up to these people, and much of what they taught you was true, when they introduced the Darwinian theory of evolution to you, sort of slipping it in with algebra, chemistry, biology and astronomy - the classical sciences, then you accepted it also without reservation, you didn't question it, you swallowed it whole since these people were your mentors and you trusted them, almost revered them. Usually it was introduced to you in science class with some Disney like animation showing lightening striking an ancient pond, then cells emerging, then fish swimming in a sea before they crawled out onto land and lost their scales and became amphibians that became reptiles that became birds and mammals that became monkeys that became humans. It was all very skillfully done, and there was usually very little actual science involved; you were told a story, much like a Sunday school Noah's Ark story, only this story left out God of course, and because it was in science class it must have been true. It never occurred to you that your teachers who told you that evolution was a fact as real as the Laws of Gravity might have themselves been deceived in their youth when they were in science class, and then they introduced that very same deception into your life, all with the very best of intentions. So you accepted evolution as being as legitimate as all of the other sciences, your teachers certainly wouldn't lie to you, and then over the course of time it became your Weltanschauung. As time progressed and you grew older, a sort of intellectual pride clouded your worldview, and also affected, or more precisely infected your understanding of earth's history, of man's origin; and you became too sophisticated to believe in the straight, literal truth of Genesis. In your youthful hubris you substituted Darwin for Moses. Over the course of time Darwinism became more entrenched in your mind. It became a dogma; it was your world view through which you interpreted reality. Part of this springs from Hellenism, the Greek philosophy that is the cornerstone of much of modern thought.
The best way to escape from studying organic chemistry, great job guys!
Unfortunately it's not possible to simplify evolution to the point that any creationist will be able to understand it.
Even if it was explained such that preschoolers can understand it, creationists will keep denying it. They're willingly obtuse and dishonest.
Nah bro, I’m a Christian and evolution is totally good to believe, i could explain more if you’d like
@@Dopio-io7bf Not all christians are young-earth-creationists.
Doesn't matter, because they're not trying to. It's an exercise in wilful denial for them. Cognitive dissonance also.
Unfortunately it's not possible to simplify creation to the point that any evolutionist will be able to understand it. In Darwin's entire Origin of Species and his Descent of Man he did not document one single example of the origin of any species, he admitted that he had no fossil evidence for evolution, and he also admitted that he had no fossil evidence for the evolution from ape to man either. Evolution is not science, it's a fraud.
Evolutionists have hijacked science in the name of atheism because of their initial rejection of Revelation. Darwin's Origin and his Descent are mere philosophic diatribes against God's role in the creation of the universe and against His providential rule and ordering of events both in the physical realm of non living systems and in the macro-molecular biological realm of living species; it is not on a par with genuine scientific treatises such as Newton's Principia Mathematica , Boyle's empirical gas law that describes the relationship between pressure and volume of a confined gas, Faraday's laws of electrolysis, Pasteur "renowned for his discoveries of the principles of vaccination, microbial fermentation, and pasteurization, the last of which was named after him. His research in chemistry led to remarkable breakthroughs in the understanding of the causes and preventions of diseases, which laid down the foundations of hygiene, public health and much of modern medicine" (Wikipedia),
Here is a short list of some genuine scientists:
Kepler's laws of planetary motion, and
Erik Acharius (1757-1819), Swedish botanist[1] who studied lichens
Gary Ackers (1939-2011), American biophysicist who worked on thermodynamics of macromolecules.
Gilbert Smithson Adair (1896-1979), British protein chemist who identified cooperative binding of oxygen binding haemoglobin.
Arthur Adams (1820-1878), English physician and naturalist[2] who classified crustaceans and molluscs
Michel Adanson (1727-1806), French naturalist[3] who studied the plants and animals of Senegal
Julius Adler (born 1930), American biochemist and geneticist known for work on chemotaxis.
Monique Adolphe (1932-2022), French cell biologist, pioneer of cell culture
Edgar Douglas Adrian (1st Baron Adrian) (1889-1977), British electrophysiologist, Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine (1932) for research on neurons.
When you compare Darwin's ramblings in his Origin to the works of these other, genuine scientists it's almost ludicrous that he has been lifted to the status of a philosopher-sage by his slack jawed, gullible band of followers.
You're belief in evolution is motivated more by a prejudice against the sovereignty of God, and a rebellion against His Lordship in your life, as it is written in Psalm Two,
1"Why do the nations conspire[a]
and the peoples plot in vain?
2 The kings of the earth rise up
and the rulers band together
against the Lord and against his anointed, saying,
3 “Let us break their chains
and throw off their shackles.”
Jesus is Lord over Darwin.
Evolution may be defined as any net directional change or any cumulative change in the characteristics of organisms or populations over many generations-in other words, descent with modification👍
Great video but some problems: an organism that "gets a mutation one day" will NOT pass that trait to its offspring. Only traits coded in the germ line get passed down. Also, organisms that move (or get moved) from one location to another is gene flow, not genetic drift.
The best way to escape from studying organic chemistry, great job guys
The evolutionary process must play out as follows if it was a reality. The individual atoms that form the body (that is lifeless matter) of the animal must possess a consciousness to be aware of what the body is, and be aware of the 'life' that is within the form/body. They must be self-aware of not only themselves, but their fellow atoms within the form/body. They must be aware of what life is and perceive the life within the form they compose. They must also be aware of what a healthy life is and what a life under stress is, and care whether it survives or not. They must also be aware of the external environment, what it should be in order to be healthy for the life within the body, and what changes it must have gone through in order to cause the stress of the life within the body, which means the atoms must also be monitoring both the life's condition, and the changing conditions of the external environment (and its effects on the body and life). The atoms must also be aware of what changes they must make to the lifeless atom-made form/body in order to restore health to the life (grow more hair in reaction to a colder environmental change). Now for the body to change form its DNA must change within its reproductive system to bring the corrective change, New information, new atoms for new genes, need to come from somewhere and be put in the right sequence within the reproductive DNA strand to bring the corrective change of growing more hair, needing to know what hair actually is in the first place, or why they are acting in a pro-life direction with the mutations, which requires, as does the rest of this, a consciousness present, which is the point that renders the evolutionary theory extinct, and shows the character of abortion as an abomination. It is obvious that all of these necessary conditions are not just impossible, but far and away from reality. Atoms do not possess their own consciousnesses, they cannot move, they cannot find new atoms for new genes somewhere and plug them into the correct position within the DNA strand, they are not self-aware. But this is exactly what they must be, and be able to do, if the Evolution theory is to play out. Impossible, impossible, impossible. This 'theory' inadvertently proves God's existence. When it is run backwards, and ends up arriving at the first atom in the evolutionary progression, the only two answers explaining where it came from are 1) coming from nothing or, 2) It had to be created out of nothing-by God. Since something cannot come from nothing the answer must be it was created by God. Ending the existence of the evolutionary theory.
'The evolutionary process must play out as follows if it was a reality..'
Well, since biological evolution is real, and there is a scientific theory that explains the facts of biological evolution, and biology/genetics and other subfields of biology wouldn't even be fields of science if evolution weren't real, and since we're also talking about applied science, then I guess atoms possess consciousness, and all that other stuff you said is true as well. Very cool.
@@travisbicklepopsicle A lot of words to state the impossible is possible. Atoms do not, cannot, possess a consciousness. Another example where the defenders of the false theory of evolution have surrendered reality to their fantasy. Where has there EVER been an example where the atoms decided to 'do their own thing'? Where when mixing two compounds to get another one, something else happened? Nowhere. Needing to escape reality to defend your evolution is proof enough evolution is a false theory.
As always..Awesome animation and lucid explanation..Keep going👍
4:24
Dogs didn't evolve from wolves. Wolves and the different breeds of the domestic dog were separately created.
Nope. There never was any "creation". All of creationism is lies and science denial.
The one problem with theory of evolution is where did the “simple cell” come from. Did it just spawn in like a video game. After you get done not figuring that out ask yourself where everything in the world came from.(planets)(how gravity is somehow mathematically perfect so we don’t get crushed). Things like that
God is real people. And things described in the Bible are being discovered to exact dimensions and locations as described in the Bible. But that’s just a “coincidence”right
Actually, the explanation for the origin of life on Earth is far less problematic from the scientific standpoint than from the theological one. To be clear, however, the theory of evolution does not attempt to explain the origin of life, simply how life progressed (evolved) from the initial biological molecule to the complex and varied forms of life we have on the world today. Going back to the origin of life (abiogenesis), while this is certainly an extraordinarily rare occurrence, there is estimated to have been (conservatively) about a billion planets in the universe that have the ‘right’ conditions for life to exist. Furthermore, we have to remember that it took approximately a billion years for this occurrence to take place on Earth. Given this, and given that we (I.e., life) exists and we are able to observe/think about these notions means that it did occur - this is the anthropic principle. This is a far more plausible explanation than the “god of gaps” argument, that claims some all-powerful being created life out of nothing; the problem with this is, put simply, who (or what) created the creator? The possibility that some infinite, and infinitely complex, being could exist and could create something as complex as life - or the universe- is way less likely than the statistical probability of abiogenesis.
even if there wasn't a sci explanation, that's zero problem or the theory of evolution which is the process of hereditary change
@@AMC2283 true. A cell became fish and the fish became an elephant 😂😂😂
@@Cormac-jd2kx yeahhhh it’s so ridiculous….why is there a problem criticizing the actually stated evolutionary path? Just because you don’t accept it doesn’t mean you get to make up what’s established.
This helps a lot !!
Thanks ScienceABC ❤️
You are welcome. We are glad that you found it useful.
Evolutionists have such colourful imaginations. They spin all these wonderful stories about how all life sprang from a single cell, and yet when you ask them how the first simple living cell was created from non-living matter, they don't have the FOGGIEST idea! Evolutionists can't string two sentences together without employing words like "maybe, perhaps, probably, might have, we think that, our best guess is that, most likely, a billion years ago, possibly," etc. All guesswork spun from their fertile imaginations. When I was younger and listened to evolutionists talk, I used to amuse myself by tracking the number of times they used all these words of uncertainty. If you told an evolutionist there was a frog which got kissed by a princess and turned into a prince, the evolutionist would call it a fairy tale. But if you said a million years ago there was a frog and the frog evolved into a rat and the rat evolved into an ape and the ape evolved into a prince, the evolutionist is prepared to believe it.
Evolutionists ermm more like acthual people who have trust in a proven theory and not sky daddy
@@Florida79578 Proven theory? Next time you meet your evolution professor ask him how the first living cell was created, and watch him scratch his head and go, "Um...I....uh....we think that a million years ago there might have been a fortuitous event which might have caused the first biotic compounds to have formed, and from which the first primordial unicellular life forms might have formed ....and...uh... our best guess is that..." And this is the so-called proven theory?"
@@mpd8633 The Kent Hovind 'where did the first cell come from' red herring... which has NOTHING to do with evolution. DISMISSED!!
@@mpd8633 Every professional biologist in the world actually knows more about this than you do, numbnuts.
Got Questions:
Dr. James Mitchell Tour
Tour is a charlatan funded by right wing billionaires who need to keep this filth called judeo Christianity alive so they can keep the masses under their control .
Just wow entire course of evolution in on video
It’s bogus
Q: Did plants also evolve from that first single cell?
Yes when a prokaryote cell ate an other autotroph
I'm using your videos to teach my kiddo science. Do you plan to make any even simpler videos?
Excellent, thank you for these important science videos
Glad you like them!
Any student of science should devote themselves to understanding the gaps and problems with macro-evolution.
What gaps?
Name them
... or to understanding that there is no difference between micro- and macro-evolution given enough time.
@@whoff59 the problem is more to do with direction than time. The 'micro-evolution' we can identify, are all examples of mutations destroying functions- e.g. a polar bear losing fur pigment or a cave fish losing sight. They may well be advantages in niche environments, but they are still genetic losses which do not explain the gains required for macro-evolution.
@@user-jb2om7cm8m No. There are well-known mechanisms of mutation which don't only destroy function but result in additional possibilities.
A gene or chromosome can be copied into several versions, one functioning just like before and the other free to adapt to new functions.
This has been shown in many many cases. One example that comes into my mind is the hemoglobin molecule or for instance chlorophyll. Over the big time frames you can clearly see evolution working: first one version and then splitting into several different versions over time in different species, starting from 1 version of some gene and then copying and variation in the copies sometimes including change in the functions.
Another example is Covid-19. Everyone could track the evolution of the several versions and adaptions of the Virus.
It didn't lose only possibilities of change, it developped other possibilities over time. And our immune system developped other possibilities and so on.
Evolution to be observed just like in cinema.
i can't believe they still teach this cultural value of the denial of Facts...
the lot of you deny the truth of Yahweh in the name of Yahshua... you deny 10 5 6 5... You deny YHWH... You deny Facts...
can you explain the Gematria associated with those names you mentioned? your comment is off topic...
@@PhilipK635I know you're a fan of Constantine and Cesare Borgia... it shows
The gap between inorganic matter and a barrier trying to maintain homeostatic conditions is fascinating 🧐
Okay, but that has nothing to do with evolution.
@@WarriorOfWriters gram positive vs negative says what?
Optimus Prime in Beast Wars.. Facts...
One of the best Evoltuion Videos i've ever seen
Who created the single cell that created us?
The micro itself from the soil
God
Evolution doesn’t disprove God, chill.
Great video, great content! Keep it up 💪
Thanks. We are glad that you liked it.
That was amazing
Genesis 1:1 " In the beginning God CREATED..... Colossians 1:16" For Him, all was created..... All was created by Him, for him." (God")
your religious beliefs are evidence of nothing and refute nothing
There is a population of Small Lizards that are Green, Agile and Arboreal. They live in a relatively humid tropical forest, with many lakes and fruit trees (the lizards' main source of food). However, due to a natural catastrophe, almost the entire biome of the region has changed. Many lizards died. The new biome is drier, rivers are scarce, there are few trees, and the vast majority of fruits have become extinct. There are only insects. After many generations, what do you think the population of the Little Lizards will be like?
:) love your vids# first comment_-
this video is by far the best video about evolution on youtube. this helped me a lot thank youu
Glad it was helpful!
where did the simple cell come from and why do we still have single-celled organisms?
presumably abiogenesis, and bacteria isn't a species, it's a kingdom of organisms.
The single-celled organisms living today are obviously still fit enough getting ressources for their life.
The single cell in the beginning of this video was *not* the very first cell but just the one which was predecessor of the single- or multi-celled organisms we have nowadays. The other ones simply died out in billions of years.
And that single cell was not the first at all. It had predecessors. Some of them were more simple, and had predecessors that were even more simple and so on.
In the beginning we just need some chemical objects and a replicating process with something with a code (memory) and mutatations on it ... then the chemical objects which will replicate better will be more than those which do not.
I mean: evolution can work not only on DNA but DNA can be a product of an evolution itself. Or proteins, or any other part of cell structures as well.
This would be how "abiogenesis" could work.
The amazing wonders in nature ... no god needed.
DNA is the blueprint? Who drew the plans? Just wonderin'.
if you're asking who and don't know what a metaphor is, you've already decided it was your god
@@AMC2283 I have not referred to God at all. Nor will I. God has nothing to do with the fact that Darwinian evolution is not science. It is a myriad of guesses based on preconceived assumptions. Enjoy your delusion, my evolutionary acquaintance. As I said, this conversation has become predictably boring.
@@kelteredprine yeah, I’m sure you asked who as sarcastically as possible because you had something in mind other than your gods. Feel free to believe in them. Evolution is exhaustively verified.
@@AMC2283 The unproven, unprovable theory of evolution is still a joke in real science. No one needs God to disprove evolution. One only needs a mild understanding of simple science.
@@kelteredprine Evolution verified for religious crybabies:
DNA scarring occurs when small blocks of DNA units are accidentally deleted or, in other cases, inserted. Insertions and deletions are created by cuts in the DNA followed by reattachment at the cut sites. Like actual scars they have a particular location and profile.
Humans and chimps share literally THOUSANDS of such random, accidental scars. Humans share many such scars with all the other primates. The idea that this could have happened by pure coincidence is impossible. It is irrelevant if some of these scars are detrimental, neutral, or beneficial. That this could have originally happened IN EACH SPECIES INDEPENDENTLY is statistically impossible.
Darwin is a famous cult leader who publicly disrespects his ancestors with his theory of evolution...
This subject is way more complicated then I thought
But why for some evolution was fast and for some slow when they all lived in a not so different environment for now to have such a big diversity of species
Because evolution doesn't have a set rate or speed because it is effected by a variety of factors, like how often they reproduce, how quickly generations pass etc.
Send this theory back to the mid-nineteenth century and ask for a refund. The alleged mechanism, an entirely random process, is absurd.
How cute! Get off your phone and go whine in your church😊
Mary was 12 when she got pregnanted by God. That is quite absurd, isn't it?
Recommend this video to your creationist friends. It's so simple that they might be able to understand evolution.
The main issue with the Theory of Evolution is that it cannot explain the reality of consciousness/free will. Evolutionists will simply dismiss consciousness as an illusion because it doesn't make sense in a materialistic world. This is the main reason I believe creation is a more rational explanation to the origin of life than evolution.
Also Biological Complexity, Paranormal Activity, and existence of Jesus are more reasons creation makes more sense over evolution imo.
You don't need to use the word, 'evolutionist', any more than you would need to use the word, 'gravityist' or 'roundearthist'..
'Evolutionary theory is the fundamental, unifying theory that underlies all the life sciences. It has formed the basis of productive and active research for over 140 years and continues to do so. This is why evolution is universally accepted among professional biology researchers'.
-- National Center for Science Education
Evolutionary theory is not supposed to explain everything; it mainly explains the biodiversity of life on Earth.
Human consciousness research is conducted by biologists, sure, but it's mainly an area of research conducted by scientists working in fields such as psychology, linguistics, neuropsychology, neuroscience..( biology related, of course, but evolutionary biologists/ geneticists mainly focus their research in other areas concerning life)
Remember that in science, there is no higher level of explanation than a theory. Scientific theories explain facts.
Evolution is not a matter of belief, or opinion, it's just the way life on earth works, which is why evolutionary theory is one of the most well evidenced, robust theories in the history of science.
Disclaimer: I'm not saying there is no God or Creator. :-)
Evolution is an observed fact of life, and evolutionary biology is applied science, in areas such as agriculture, and most importantly, medicine, which is why there is a field of science called *evolutionary medicine*
Remember that when it comes to science, it doesn't matter if something seems difficult for you to believe, or if something seems to not make sense, since science is not about what 'makes sense'. Quantum mechanics doesn't make sense to most people, but it's real and it works.
Evolution may not make sense to you, but it's real, and it's how life works.
That's as stupid as saying that the main issue with the law of gravity is that it cannot explain how life started.
"your theory doesn't explain something that it was never supposed to explain"
Huh 🤔
I do believe in God but i also believe in Evolution
Consciousness is the result of brain function. The more complex the brain, the higher level of consciousness. All animals have a degree of consciousness but only a few animals are self aware like apes and humans. Humans are just apes with less hair and more complex brains. Free will is a very suspect concept. Identical twin studies suggest that we don't really have free will. Identical twins seem to live very similar lives.
if we all come from the same cell, and the driving factors of change are the same for all of us, why so much diversity though?
trillions of possible chemical combinations
"Common ancestor" seems to suggest an individual. More correctly it means a population of the same cell type.
This is nice. Showing the growth.
Darwin dishonors his ancestors and taught the world to do the same... Facts...
@@PhilipK635hear me now and believe me later... the Almighty is clearly alive... you have eyes but you can't see?, you have ears, but can't hear?... maybe because it isn't for you to see or hear and the only way for you to know is for me to tell you...
@@PhilipK635scripture written in stone from the Sumerian chicken scratch, to Egyptian hieroglyphs, to Paleo Hebrew to corrupted file Constantine version, to the corrupted file King James, with an extra extreme corrupted file Mohammed and Khadija... Facts...
@@PhilipK635 and one last note, we are not m.f. Aliens!!!
@@PhilipK635 the significance of Paleo Hebrew YHWH correposnds in Hebrew Gematria as 10 5 6 5, which is also coded in our DNA, which brands us as Yahweh in the name of Yahshua' creation... Facts...
@@PhilipK635 according to negative Gentile social engineering, it is crazy to go against those engineers...
Super
if all life evolved around a single cell then where did cells come from?
abiogenesis, evolution only explains the diversity of life maybe stop trying to group 2 sciences into 1
@@Xarai Are you saying that life and every other organisms including oxygen, ocean, stars , galaxies, all of these resources came from a nonliving matter. Smh You're a FOOL!
@@mr.fanstastic9010 That's not what he said
Pond scum was struck by lightning, then protein decided to move around and build itself into something alive, which became aware of itself, and alive, and a few millionsof millions of years later, it began insulting others on CZcams. That is how life began, according to the science of evolution, and also, how it ends.
@@Cicada3773 No, that's not how it works.
This is adaptation not change of a kind…….-
kind isn't a category in taxonomy, and evolution isn't just speciation
Evolution is the change of inherited characteristics within populations over generations. You're wasting your time trying to debunk strawmen, if you want to destroy evolution, learn what it is first.
Great video. Thanks!
This is a concise, easy to understand introduction to this topic, thank you.
Glad it was helpful!
I cant believe people still believe this
You know what I can’t believe? That people believe in fake, mythical stories made by MAN and are so GULLIBLE to believe it because of child indoctrination and money.
intelligent people don't believe it, we find the evidence sound
They still believe we went to the moon 😂
Facts don't care about your beliefs. Facts just are.
And i can't believe that there are still people, that believe 1+1 doesn't equal 2
A video on adaption vs evolution is needed. To often evolution is not the factor but adaption is. Artificial selection accounts for adaptation.
Genetic adaptation is evolution
Ok put in tamil
No
stop pushing this false narrative on creation... stop creating whole [ insert vulgarity here] Gentiles...
Facts...
Amazing smart man
load a hundred turkeys onto a hundred cessnas for a few hundred years,drop them from a hundred feet,some a the dummies will develop wing./flight power land safely,, live to ,make turkiettes presto
what is the summary of this vid?
asap, just needed.
A rather recent film "Darwins Dilemma" gives a more likely and verifiable view of lifes origin and progression . Around 12 tenured published experts across 3 continents present facts, evidence, and geologic findings from the Cambrian explosion showing abrupt fully formed appearance and a complete lack of gradualness . Darwin himself even admitted that if the Cambrian held, it would be lethal to his theory .
The Cambrian poses zero problem for evolution.
What does a non-fully formed organism look like?
@@mcmanustony Theres is something called evolution, however it is not darwins "species jumping". The film shows complete dismantling of Darwins "theory" .
@@mcmanustony Probably not complete in its adult life .
@@ronbyrd1616 Darwin was largely correct as has been demonstrated every day since he published.
Speciation has been observed, documented and published.
Precursors to the Cambrian fauna in the Ediacaran period are well know- the "soft shellies"
Darwin had no doubt that his theory would be extended and improved. He had no doubt it was correct.
People who take the theory of evolution as fact honestly have to show more faith than those who believe in a creator
Your lack of understanding about Evolution is not evidence agaist this Scientific Theory.
@@walkergarya I don't lack understanding. I can day this because I am educated on the theory.
@@arelfarrington9943 No you are not. That is just another lie.
@walkergarya right...because I need to lie about understanding evolution as if we aren't commenting on a video discussing the very topic.
@@arelfarrington9943 So according to you, I should ignore the scientific consensus of thousands of working biologist, from over 100 years of study, millions of fossils, tens of thousands of genetic studies and more because YOU are a self declared expert of the Theory of Evolution and you say it is wrong.
That is not happening. Ever.
once I was an agnostic I told my self, stop speaking and reading about "subjective opinions" of (Philosophers ,Spiritual leaders or Fabricated science) and start reading the whole Quran. and I found the only objective answer for our lives existence.
Evolution is still true though
@@Gary4DLCno it isn't
How can evolution explain how the first cell was formed?by random association
That's a fairytale
What about your theory, it's also fairy tail 🤷♀️ by that sense 🤔
Yeah,Darwin was agnostic.
@@AyeshaKhan-mq6tn No one says cell formation was random. Environmental conditions had to be just right, and cells as they are today weren't the beginning of life. It was, as usual, a gradual accumulation of minor changes to get to current-day cells. Look it up. Ask someone who can help you look it up.
4:41 what is the scientific proof of this there is nothing to support this claim
The Gentiles have eyes, but they cannot see?!... The Gentiles have ears, but they cannot hear?!..."the humans have eyes, yet cannot see... the humans have ears, yet cannot hear,"
Evolution is real.
The world is a sphere.
Maybe the universe could be flat :))
Science ABC, thanks for video👍
just because if the thinks are linked doesn't mean they're related it just tells we all are the same beings of god created with same logic
@@dontviewmybio8248 god ?
@@ororomar yes?
Why the "Baldness" trait has been passed down through generations, I hate this trait 😭
Darwin was all bs 😂
Apart from Darwin's concept that man was evolved from ape, quran the only holy book verifies evolution theory.
You may visit my video "Creation of first life cell". I've explained evolution theory in the light of Quranic references.
error? man evolved from 'monkey' (should be ape)
Summary: Total b.s.
why do you think so?
@Scienceabc because there is absolutely zero evidence, and none of it is scientifically testable.
@@Scienceabc cuz this person is dumb
@@Dale30 How do microorganisms evolve rapidly? How can they jump host species within our own lifetime? Why do we have all these sub species slightingly different when isolated? you dont even know what evidence is.
This video gave me a better understanding of how this theory is wrong 🫡 if you are subscribed to the belief that we started from a big bang I got a question for you. How did the 1st ever LIVING cell get on the planet because the earth is separated into 4 main segments core, outer core , mantle , and the crust so how did plants get here because plants are a living organism that has cells separate from animals. So how did the 1st living single cell survive and then reproduce enough cells to make the 1st plant. And for reference I’m saying this because animal life can’t survive without oxygen. So how did the 1st ever single cell bacteria even start to exist because if the “big bang “ created everything at one time where was the living bacteria at? Now I also as where did the first ever animal bacteria come from and how did it reproduce AND once established how did it get from that one animal into 8.7 million known species of animals all that very in different shapes size and methods of survival and so on and so forth. There’s WAY to many holes in this argument to say that it is the creation of life just saying 😳
Why are you so concerned about science when you believe in the magical creator deity of a middle-eastern tribe?
@@DocReasonable not magical 1st off 2nd the best way to put Darwin’s theory into perspective is to ask harder questions then what I feel most people are capable of understanding and if you can’t answer the questions with at least certainty and evidence then you’re no longer a atheist you just don’t want to take accountability for actually looking into any faith because it makes you feel bad about yourself when you realize you’re a bad person by the standards set by faith. In other words you don’t like how there’s a being so much better than you and you don’t want him to make you feel bad so you just say the being is not real!
@@GarrettBlake-oj5ew You call me a bad person for not worshipping or believing in THIS monster?
'Shall there be evil in a city, and the LORD hath not done it?' Amos 3 6
'I create darkness and create evil, I the LORD do all these things!' Isaiah 45 7
'I will bring evil upon this people, even of their thoughts!' Jeremiah 6 19
'I will bring evil upon all flesh, saith the LORD!' Jeremiah 45 5 @samuel8354
'I will cause them to eat the flesh of their sons and of their daughters!' Jeremiah 19 9
'If ye will not give glory unto my name, I will spread dung upon your faces!' Malachi 2.2,3.
'Now kiII all the boys. And kiII every woman who has slept with a man, but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a man.' Numbers 31 17-18.
Here is what I see has happened to many who have been seduced by Darwinism. You were taught certain fundamental truths as a youth. You were instructed in the sciences, in mathematics, physics, geography, history and biology by teachers whom you respected as a youth, whom you admired and looked up to. And because as an impressionable youth you admired, respected and looked up to these people, and much of what they taught you was true, when they introduced the Darwinian theory of evolution to you, sort of slipping it in with algebra, chemistry, biology and astronomy - the classical sciences, then you accepted it also without reservation, you didn't question it, you swallowed it whole since these people were your mentors and you trusted them, almost revered them. Usually it was introduced to you in science class with some Disney like animation showing lightening striking an ancient pond, then cells emerging, then fish swimming in a sea before they crawled out onto land and lost their scales and became amphibians that became reptiles that became birds and mammals that became monkeys that became humans. It was all very skillfully done, and there was usually very little actual science involved; you were told a story, much like a Sunday school Noah's Ark story, only this story left out God of course, and because it was in science class it must have been true. It never occurred to you that your teachers who told you that evolution was a fact as real as the Laws of Gravity might have themselves been deceived in their youth when they were in science class, and then they introduced that very same deception into your life, all with the very best of intentions. So you accepted evolution as being as legitimate as all of the other sciences, your teachers certainly wouldn't lie to you, and then over the course of time it became your Weltanschauung. As time progressed and you grew older, a sort of intellectual pride clouded your worldview, and also affected, or more precisely infected your understanding of earth's history, of man's origin; and you became too sophisticated to believe in the straight, literal truth of Genesis. In your youthful hubris you substituted Darwin for Moses. Over the course of time Darwinism became more entrenched in your mind. It became a dogma; it was your world view through which you interpreted reality. Part of this springs from Hellenism, the Greek philosophy that is the cornerstone of much of modern thought.
Nope. The data prove it. It’s that simple.
@@peteconrad2077 You've been brainwashed.
It would be great if y'all would state this as a theory rather than fact. Science is not perfect. Many theories in the past have been proven false that were accepted fact previously.
Darwin's theory of evolution: An imaginary fictional process by which random changes in the nucleotide base sequence leads to new species and morphological forms.
Your denial of Evolution is made without evidence and thus has no value.
they will try anything to discredit god..then where did the cell come from..you cant make something out of nothing
Different question. And don’t forget, most Christian’s accept both evolution and the Big Bang.
Quick IQ test...
Solve: 4, 5, 14, 185, ...
Absolute nonsense!
Earth is not billions of years old!
Man did not evolve. He was made by God:
39 All flesh is not the same flesh: **but there is one kind of flesh of men, another flesh of beasts, another of fishes, and another of birds.
40 There are also celestial bodies, and bodies terrestrial: but the glory of the celestial is one, and the glory of the terrestrial is another.
41 There is one glory of the sun, and another glory of the moon, and another glory of the stars: for one star differeth from another star in glory. Corinthians 15 KJV
How old is the earth then?
@@Lexi2019AURORA
Start with Genesis.
Then again after the flood.
@@jamig.7254l😂😂😂
@@mikewilliams7377
What's funny?
@@jamig.7254 the fact you still believe in Iron Age fairy tales for children. We live in a world where superstition has been replaced by knowledge.
Explain how a random mutation, such as good hearing, gets passed onto the offspring? If the species is a butterfly, then it only has 1 day to pass on this genetic mutation. How is that possible?
By having offspring. What are you even asking here?
I can't really ask the question in any other way. It's about the time the species has to pass on the genetic information.
@@davidfellows1650 "It's about the time the species has to pass on the genetic information."
Well clearly they have the time to pass on the genetics, I mean we DO have butterflies still, they DO appear to be breeding well no matter how short their lives are.
@@thehowlingjoker I'm questioning the theory. Sticking with the butterfly example, the theory means that a butterfly would firstly need to decide on a genetic mutation that would benefit its species in a billion years time, and then pass on that genetic mutation (or the start of it) in just 1 day. Why and how would that happen?
@@davidfellows1650 Well for starters the butterfly doesn't choose anything, rather it will have been born with a change in its' genetics that is in some regard beneficial and thus, said butterfly is more likely to succeed in surviving and passing on those genetics to the next generation.
If its offspring also inherit that new change in genetics, then they too would be more likely to survive and reproduce, passing the genetics on further.
This process over several generations can cement that genetic change in the population, in other words, as those with the gene are more successful in breeding, that gene becomes more widespread as more generations are born with the gene.
Over enough generations, that gene could become entirely dominant in the population of butterflies, and subsequent generations could inherit other changes that compound upon the previous genes.
So in short, the gene is successful as it spreads throughout the population over reproductive generations. Each generation increasing the number of individuals in the population with that gene.
Does that help explain things?
I'm a man ape 🤪😎😤😌
This video in itself is disproving evolution when trying to cover its bases. 7:03 proves that evolution has a MAJOR flaw. What happened to the hundreds of in between species? So no humanoid apes survived and procreated? not even the ones that were closest to modern day humans? what about all of the animals from in between? where are the 2,3,4, or 5, celled organisms? So apes made it through being the supposed first wave of ancestors and the smarter versions all died out? And this happened to ALL of the species alive on earth today? doesn't make sense.
No fool, what does not make sense is creationism.
@walkergarya I'm a fool because the theory has flaws? I believe in a creator but I'm not a creationist. Not in the sense that everything was created in 6-7 24hour days. It's funny how you didn't answer any of my questions rather you decided to sling insults.
@@arelfarrington9943 You can claim "flaws in the Theory of Evolution", all you want but it remains the foundation of all modern biology.
@walkergarya The basis of all modern biology is the animals and creatures that exist now in observable human history. We cannot study any animals or human ancestors claimed by scientists. This means biology goes only as far as when scientists developed the study.
@@arelfarrington9943 U R braindead.
God get over it.get over yourself..... 😅😅😅😅
your religious beliefs refute nothing
Fairytales.
Most of this is false
like what? explain or gtfo srsly what a waste of a comment
Such as? 👀
Everything That Is Was Created Through Intelligence Design , For Example , If I Were To Decided To raise chickens , First I would have to create a comfortable environment for them to live in next I would have to provide them with a source of fresh water and a food supply . And that would all take intelligent design ! And this is exactly what , Almighty God did He created the Heavens and the Earth next he created the seas and the dry land , and then the grass and fruit and nut trees of many kinds , and berry bushes of many different kinds , and vegetables of many different kinds and grapes of many different kinds and grains for bread and all the beast of many different kinds , cattle and goats for fresh milk and sheep and cotton for clothing , and to help with labor , Horses and Oxen and donkeys . And all the fish in the Oceans , Seas and rivers and lakes ! And then Made Mankind is His Own image and told them to go forth and multiply ! Almighty God gave Mankind Dominion over all the beast on the land and waters and air ! Face it Everything was Created through Almighty God’s Intellect Design ! In 6 days and on the 7th day He rested , And Sanctified It as His Holy Sabbath ! All evolutionist can do is say everything happened by accident and all life evolved from a chemical reaction of some sort which is impossible ! If evolution is true where is Evolutionist Proof ? Would there not be bones of the dead in transition everywhere , because according to evolutionists theory it is continuous so evidence should be everywhere ! They should not even have to look that hard ! And evolutionists claim the earth is billions of years old and dinosaurs are millions of years old yet if that were true the marrow in the dinosaurs bones would be dust at best ! Yet there is tissue inside the bones that can produce DNA which would be impossible if the bones were millions of years old and evolutionist claim there was no worldwide flood but can’t explain why sea creatures fossils are found on the mountain tops ! And Noah’s Ark was found by Ron Wyatt as well as Sodom and Gomorrah and the Place where Almighty God Parted The Red Sea so Moses and The Israelites could escape The Egyptian Army and where The Egyptian Army was Destroyed when Almighty God closed the Red Sea on Them and drowned Them and can prove it and more ! See Ron Wyatt’s Discovery’s ! For Proof !
Ron Wyatt? EVEN ANSWERS IN GENESIS SAYS HE'S A FRAUD.
@@DocReasonable Did you see Ron Wyatt’s Discoveries ? If not you are the Fraud , and quite frankly you are ignorant and uninformed .
And Ron Wyatt proves that the Book of Genesis is correct ! I suspect that you have not even read the book of Genesis , because if you had read the book of Genesis you would have agreed with Ron Wyatt’s Discoveries because he proves that everything in the book Genesis and the book of Exodus it seems to me you have not read either , so calling Ron Wyatt a fraud without actually seeing the video makes you the fraud .
You don't even know that Ron Wyatt has been DEAD for years. His lies and fraud prove NOTHING in the bible! @@ernestreichardt1548
'Mr. Ron Wyatt is neither an archaeologist nor has he ever carried out a licensed excavation in Israel or Jerusalem. In order to excavate one must have at least a BA in archaeology which he does not possess despite his claims to the contrary. We are aware of his claims which border on the absurd.'
Shalom
Joe Zias
Curator of Anthropology/Archaeology
Israel Antiquities Authority @@ernestreichardt1548
Why evolution stops now 😂😂😂
wtf do you mean it stopped
It didn't 🤦
Ur dumb🤦
Show one example then!!??@@jay70328
It's not a theory people keep calling it a theory because the book he published was called the theory of evolution by Charles Darwin. But it's pretty much unanimously decided amongst all scientific scholars. That evolution is a fact, not a theory. People keep calling it a theory because of the title of the book. But it's not a theory. It's bit observed pretty clearly in most parts of the world, especially in places that are very isolated like Madagascar.
Evolution is a fact AND a theory.
A fact is something that is verifiable, a theory is an explanation of facts/phenomena.
Evolution is a fact that HAS theory (written body of work) to describe it.
Darwin's books are "On the Origin of Species" and "The Descent of Man".
Dont forget that there are still millions of prokaryotic organisms around here and they havent evolved even a bit since billions of years how do you expect us to come from a single celled organism to beings that are interested in arts, science. Politics etc. Darwin was a big fool and his believers are also fools to blindly believe him. Even dinosaurs and humans co existed at the same time but at different places, and human population was less at that time so it wasnt a big problem. There have been civilizations, scientifically more advanced than us and even they got destroyed and got resetted in stone age era. This is the world, this is the truth..u may call me a lunatic but there r infinite possibilities in this world that r still unknown to us.@@DocReasonable
God created everything! We did not come from a single cell! Jesus is King!✝️
evidence? didnt think so, go read your old myths and ignore reality
@@Xarai Actually, according to faith, one believes first. However, according to science, it's the scientists job to provide evidence for something observable and repeatable. So, please provide, simple evidence for evolution, and explain it as simply as possible for the poor, simple-minded of faith in dusty old books, okay? And then everyone will not just believe it like you do, but will also know it like you do, since it isn't special, hidden knowledge that makes evolution work, right? Please just explain the evidence and cite the proof, as simply as you can, because, remember, you were compelled to use insults and to ask a person of faith to provide evidence for something you understand to be invisible, and based on faith alone. So, it really is the job of the scientist to give the evidence, and not vice versa. This should be easy for someone so smart as you, and please, refrain from further insults by statements such as, "It's too complicated, and you wouldn't understand." That isn't the fault of the observer who is asking to know the evidence. It is a scientific fact, right? Then please, make it clear, even just explain something as simple as why an eyelash grows a certain length, as opposed to hair on the top of the head that keeps growing. One mutation gone wrong there, and you'd have a blind mutation! Go slowly, and speak deliberately, then, in explaining the evidence for evolution. Thanks!
Grow up
Evolution is a man made theory. The theory of the big bang explosion, is crazy as all human life is far too complex to be an accident. Every living thing on this earth has to be designed and created. God is the creator.
Next scientists will be saying that humans will eventually evolve into snakes or elephants. Surely if one thinks how complex the brain is and what it can do, it had to be designed. God created all life on this planet. He made the world In six days and rested on the seventh.
The bible is the truest book because its the word of God. If you see how worse the world is getting all the time, there is only one answer, the Lord Jesus christ. Believe in him and you shall be saved .
@@WarriorOfWriters crazy that believing in all of creation coming from a Creator is not believable to people. But a big bang out of nowhere created everything and somehow humans evolved with a since of morality. That right there is ridiculous.
This is all well and good, but how did the first ever monkey came to be though?
The first animal we call 'monkey' evolved from another kind of primate ancestor, which evolved from another kind of mammalian tetrapod animal, which evolved from some other form of vertebrate animal probably, which evolved from another multi-cellular organism, and how long should I go on? New species won't just pop up magically. A deer won't suddenly give birth to a whale. It's a spectrum where all similar living organisms are on. The changes are gradual and cumulative, and happen over a significant amount of time, millions or billions of years, and over countless generations and mutations. In short-lived and rapidly breeding species these changes can be observed easier. Once the changes between different generations and lineages are significant enough that they are distinguishable from another kind of animal population, we call it a new species.
@@Baalaaxa and where did the first ever organism that evolved into monkey come from?
@@Tee9156 - You're talking about Abiogenesis, the origin of life. No one knows how life began from non-life. And evolution doesn't concern itself with Abiogenesis.
What I find refreshing about science is that, when the unknown is faced, science simply states "we don't know". I appreciate the intellectual honesty.
When theists come up against areas in which nothing is known they state "Oh that? God did that, yeah, that was God creating that"
@@donmiller2908 and what's wrong with that?
@@Tee9156 - Because what they are saying, "Oh that? God did that, yeah, that was God creating that", cannot be proven to be true.
Since the start of Christianity there have been upheavals concerning christian teachings. The most drastic being when Martin Luther came along and decided some of the teachings of the church were wrong and protested those teachings, forming Protestants. But then Protestants argued amongst themselves regarding biblical teachings and formed other divisions. So today you have Protestants, Baptists, Calvinists, Lutherans, Episcopalians, Catholics, Presbyterians, Anglicans, Methodists, on and on. There are hundreds if not more different denominations of Christian churches ALL believing that they are the one true church following the true and righteous path.
And that doesn't even take into account the untold number of people that believe Islam, or Judaism or Hinduism is the true and proper religion. It's insane.
If the truth is important to you, you'll embrace the scientific method.
Science, unlike religion, does not make truth claims. Science provides models that are the best explanation of the current available evidence. Those models are subject to testing and subject to revision, so that when we find new information we actually modify what the scientific model is. These are not proclamations of truth or certainty at all but merely our best understanding of all the available information AT THAT TIME. It is the most intellectually honest and intellectually rigorous process that I am aware of.
What you believe is based on WHAT you believe in.
I'll go with Creation, based on Historic and Archaeological FACTS
What facts lol
@@kye4216 I guess he forgot cause its been 5 months
Archaeological? 😂
Facts? Lol
No, you prefer your religious beliefs.
That's bullshit. Human did not came from monkeys.
You're right. Humans did not 'come from' monkeys. Well done.
Common ancestor*
@@Lexi2019AURORA Exactly👍📚👴🐢
So this is an atiest channel...
how does humans come from monkey? god created humans.
No. Its a science channel.
@@Danijzi a science channel that says humans ccame from monkeys is illogical trash
@@cer8aminations94
Science believes in facts, religion is faith. Illogical to mix em together.
@@Danijzi so you arare saying -everything was created from a single atom by accident....😂
The quran mentioned so many science before those were even discovered......search scientific miracles of al quran on youtube....don't reply until you do it
@@cer8aminations94
When did i say any of that?
The video is about evolution, which has nothing to do with god. Evolution doesn't explain the origin of life, and Yes I do believe there is a "God" responsible for it. If you follow Islam or any other religion then yeah sure you can be ignorant as much as you like, dont let your insecurities out on an educational channel.
Darwin was all bs 😂
why do you think so?
@@Scienceabcare you serious???
Do your research.
It’s a THEORY not proven tho
Plus too many points that have been debunked
It’s a joke.
Dont forget that there are still millions of prokaryotic organisms around here and they havent evolved even a bit since billions of years how do you expect us to come from a single celled organism to beings that are interested in arts, science. Politics etc. Darwin was a big fool and his believers are also fools to blindly believe him. Even dinosaurs and humans co existed at the same time but at different places, and human population was less at that time so it wasnt a big problem. There have been civilizations, scientifically more advanced than us and even they got destroyed and got resetted in stone age area. This is the world, this is the truth..u cn call me a lunatic but there r infinite possibilities in this world that r still unknown to us..but I never buy this darwin BS cuz I still got some thinking process in my brain😂🤷🏻♂️@@Scienceabc
Dont forget that there are still millions of prokaryotic organisms around here and they havent evolved even a bit since billions of years how do you expect us to come from a single celled organism to beings that are interested in arts, science. Politics etc. Darwin was a big fool and his believers are also fools to blindly believe him. Even dinosaurs and humans co existed at the same time but at different places, and human population was less at that time so it wasnt a big problem. There have been civilizations, scientifically more advanced than us and even they got destroyed and got resetted in stone age area. This is the world, this is the truth..u may call me a lunatic but there r infinite possibilities in this world that r still unknown to us..but I never buy this darwin BS cuz I still got some thinking capabilities in my brain and still got some brain cells I guess😂🤷🏻♂️@@Scienceabc
@@Cormac-jd2kx today you're concerned about proof like there's a shred for your religious beliefs?