Catholic Obedience to Unfaithful Church Leaders (Guest: Peter Kwasniewski)
Vložit
- čas přidán 3. 08. 2024
- How can a Catholic be obedient when Church leaders promote same-sex blessings, shut down authentically Catholic liturgies, and continually undermine the Faith?
Guest:
Peter Kwasniewski is a full-time writer and public speaker whose work is seen at websites and in periodicals such as New Liturgical Movement, OnePeterFive, Rorate Caeli, Catholic Family News, and Latin Mass Magazine. Dr. Kwasniewski has published extensively in academic and popular venues on sacramental and liturgical theology, Catholic Social Teaching, issues in the contemporary Church, and the history and aesthetics of music; he is also is a composer whose sacred choral music has been performed around the world. The author or editor of many books, Kwasniewski’s writings have been translated into at least twenty languages.
Links:
• "Ultramontanism and Tradition" (book): osjustipress.com/products/ult...
• "Bound by Truth" (book): osjustipress.com/products/bou...
• "Tradition and Sanity" (substack): traditionsanity.substack.com - Zábava
I am 65 and have never been able to go to a Novis Mass. Every time I got involved with a Novie Church they threw something new at me, as in Eucharistic ministers, altar girls, and such. I have never been able to settle in. I want the Mass of my ancestors.
I want the mass of my ancestors , as well .
I want the Communion of Saints at a Catholic Mass .
The new Protestant Catholicism is terribly lacking .
I pray God help us preserve our sacred traditions .
Why does Bergoglio strive to honor Pagan Traditions and strive to destroy the beautiful , ancient , grace- filled traditions of his very own Church .
The Church that people DIED to defend .
Because Bergoglio is an enemy infiltrator. A Manchurian candidate that does the bidding of the late Cardinal Martini and the St. Gallen mafia, Deep Church/State, NWO apparatus. He serves them, not the real Catholic Church.@@jackieann5494
The NO Mass: Aka, the McMass.
Novus Ordo Mass. It's all I know. If done reverently it's ok.
@@sliglusamelius8578 Yes, I try to will, whatever I want, the Mass of Christ.
This is one of the best explanations of the current crisis which I have ever heard ; combining history, theology, liturgy and spirituality. Unfortunately, “ the spirit of Vatican I” has changed the original intent of Our Lord for the office of Peter from “Confirming the brethren in the faith,” to a “divine oracle” whose every word, action and decision is the unquestionable “ will of God!” The abuse of authority can lead to a dictator pope as is clearly seen in this disastrous pontificate.
to giovanni ..., Are you complicit in the 2000-year embezzlements and fraud on vulnerable roman catholic church role group members causing the worldwide disaster of sexual abuse of children and vulnerable adults within the family?
Francis' intention as Pope is "to make a mess" of the occult as hidden, incest connected as substitute mate grooming by diseased 'familyist' family members of psychologically and or emotionally vulnerable family members in roles within the RCC role group.
This grooming is with an inducement of, or association with "higher vocation" (Pope St John Paul 2, "Guidelines", TTMHS, PCF, 1995, 35; cf. St Paul's "opinion", 1 Cor7:25-34) of consecrated celibate marriage vowed to man in Christ to consecrated male female marriage vowed to God.
It is for economic advantage of families of the groomers by tax-exemption embezzlements and lower insurance cost by fraud.
This making a mess is by the consecrated celibate marriage in which Pope Francis consents in uncertainty of his belief to be joined.
This making a mess is for out occulting this occult, incest connected evil as did Pope Francis on 17 June 2021 in his particular cases of embezzlements of his procreation role gift charity donations by ten of his Vatican state citizens/employees, including Cardinal Angelo Becciu, and an unacceptable risk of fraud on the identity of his consecrated celibate marriage by the Italian Parliament "Zan" anti-homophobia bill.
It always seemed that so called chosesn people were so above and untouchable and this is a deep belief that is held. I also feel a little angered when for evanple an order can sell their resort va cayion place for MILLIONS. buy another the next day and then beg for money because they are so poor!
@@terricolbert2948 Yes. Who groomed them as "above and untouchable" and with what inducement for what occult as hidden, incest connected as substitute mate economic advantages?
Were these advantages by tax-exemption embezzlements and lower insurance cost by fraud for families of these groomers?
Were the groomers diseased family member 'familyists'?
Were the groomed psychologically and or emotionally vulnerable family members in their procreation gift roles?
Was the inducement by these groomers a, or association with non-economic status falsely purported presumed believed a "higher vocation" (TTMHS, PCF, 1995, 35; cf. St Paul's "opinion" at 1Cor7:25-34) of celibate vowed to man in Christ to male female vowed to God consecrated marriage?
Dear Dr. K please don’t let people like Lofton bother you. They obviously have zero clue about what the church actually teaches regarding the Mass and office of the Pope. Keep up the great work
I don’t give Lofton the time of day. Have blocked his channel.
Unfortunately pope lofton has a decent amount of followers, including clergy. So we must speak against the magisterium of reason and theology.
toRunsfrombears, I pay attention to what consecrated marriage, celibate or male female, exercises an absolute power of its simultaneous authorisations regarding the procreation gift roles of the Mass and the office of the Pope.
So also, in uncertainty I believe, does Pope Francis in his particular circumstances as on 17 June 2021 in his cases of:
(a) embezzlements of his charity donations by ten of his Vatican state citizens/employees, including Cardinal Angelo Becciu,
(b) simultaneously withstood by him an unacceptable risk of fraud on his identity as a consecrated celibate married by vows to man in Christ by the Italian Parliament "Zan" anti-homophobia bill.
This withstanding of these extreme tensions by this consecrated celibate marriage of Pope Francis vowed to man in Christ on the reference point of Mary keeping in uncertainty of her belief as reported at Lk1:29-45 and Mt1:24 the inseparability and qualitative equality of her consecrated celibate marriage vowed to man in Christ at RSV Lk1:38: "let it be to me", and her consecrated male female marriage vowed to God at RSV Mt1:24: "Joseph ... took his wife".
@@Linkgt Is your apparent disrespect for the person of Michael Lofton indicative of any disrespect by you for your own family member identity in need of union?
This family member identity if diseased as 'familyist' might groom yourself in your procreation gift role especially if psychologically and or emotionally vulnerable with a non-economic status inducement of, or association with "higher vocation" of consecrated celibate marriage vowed to man in Christ to consecrated male female marriage vowed to God for occult as hidden, incest connected as substitute mate, economic advantage by tax-exemption embezzlements and lower insurance cost by fraud.
Very nuanced discussion. Very convincing. Thank you!
Excellent show Eric and thank you Dr K for your tireless efforts and intellectual leadership in the promotion and restoration of the Traditional Latin Mass!
to agrarian-peasant, for me it is my emotional dependence on doing instead of been that is out of balance with my intellectual leadership.
Dr Peter Kwasniewski is such a delight to listen to, and I have some of his books, as he brings so much clarity to the current crises in the Church.
I agree. I can’t read anything pastoral PF says when he is quoted. He has completely tainted anything that seems spiritually good or faithful.
One of the many multitudinous reasons it's such a blessing to be Catholic is that the Doctors of the Church, the Early Church Fathers, the Saints, and documents of the good popes are always there to uplift and to guide us in the unchanging truth and holiness of Christ.
I gave Pope Francis the benefit of the doubt all the way up to Fiducia Supplicans. I think that was the final straw for many people who were really trying to hold out in good faith.
to XRPriest, for me the question is: "good faith" or 'good thinking' or in uncertainty, 'good belief' as the keeping of the inseparability and qualitative equality of thinking and having faith?
I was using "good faith" as synonymous with benefit of the doubt. Or technically "Obsiquem" that is religious submission of mind and will. Fiducia is just a bridge too far for many of the faithful, not only Trads.@@oliverclark5604
Catherine of Sienna To Pope Gregory XI: “ Take care that I do not have to complain about you to Jesus crucified. There is no one else I can complain to, for you have no superior on earth. “
The crowd resoundingly chants DOC-TOR-KAY, DOC-TOR-KAY, DOC-TOR-KAY. Dr. K's beard is turning from gray to silver adding to his sagacity and wisdom. Always love listening to his wealth of knowledge, insight and beautifully crafted lectures. Keep up the great restoration of rhetoric and oratory.
Lol great comment
to loyaltotruth, does "rhetoric and oratory" in a diseased 'familyist' family member identity groom itself in its family member procreation gift role with non-economic status for economic advantage by embezzlements and fraud?
Were these the two offences causing extreme tensions withstood simultaneously by Pope Francis on 17 June 2021 in the cases respectively of his Vatican state ten citizens/employees, including Cardinal Angelo Becciu, and the Italian state Parliament "Zan" anti-homophobia bill?
Very informative. Thanks, Eric and Peter!
Fantastic show!!
I didn't invent the Akita Japan prophecy. I also did not have my brain sucked out of my head. I see what PF is up to and I don't like it.
to sligus ..., better for me to: "... have not seen and yet believe" (Jn 20:29), whether I like it or not.
@@oliverclark5604
Yes that's true, it's better to believe even if you have not seen.
@@sliglusamelius8578 my greed in my diseased family member 'familyist' grooming in this identity in need of union of myself in my procreation gift role for tax-exemption by my embezzlements and lower insurance cost by my fraud biased my seeing.
Thank you Eric!
We really enjoy your program and Dr. Peter
Great discussion.
Wonderful session. True masculinity needed. Saty true to the latin liturgy and true teaching... lex orandi, lex credendi, lex vivendi. Dont give in. Mrs B Adelaide South Australia
Absolutely!! Strength in numbers!!! 🙏❤️
Much wisdom here. Let us be attentive. Thank you!
To ThanksStJoseph, I try to be attentive to the extreme tensions caused by grooming of psychologically and emotionally dependent vulnerable family members that the consecrated celibate marriage vowed to man in Christ in which Pope Francis in his present moment attentiveness is consenting to be joined withstood and particularly on 17 June 2021 in his consecrated celibate marriage's particular cases of his Vatican state citizens/employees Cardinal Becciu + 9 and the Italian Parliament "Zan" anti-homophobia bill.
How insane is it how many times Francis quotes himself in his own documents? I don’t think that’s ever been done in history.
to Runsfrombears, am I "insane" when I in my family member procreation gift role quote myself in my family member identity in need of union and vice versa?
This question is especially relevant if in the case of my purpose of keeping in uncertainty of my belief in my particular circumstances in my present moment the inseparability and qualitative equality (covenant, non-presumed reciprocity) of this identity and this role in withstanding extreme tensions caused by complicity by grooming by my identity of my role with a non-economic status inducement of, or association with "higher vocation" (Pope St John Paul 2's "Guidelines", TTMHS, PCF, 1995, 35; cf. St Paul's "opinion" 'not given by God' at 1Cor7:25-34) of consecrated celibate marriage vowed to man in Christ to consecrated male female marriage vowed to God for economic advantage of my family by tax-exemption embezzlements and lower insurance cost by fraud?
On 17 June 2021 Pope Francis' consecrated celibate marriage vowed to man in Christ both did in its role and was in its identity this inseparability and qualitative equality in his particular cases simultaneously of
(a) the Vatican state Cardinal Becciu + 9 alleged embezzlements of his procreation role gift charity donations,
(b) the Italian Parliament "Zan" anti-homophobia bill as an unacceptable risk of fraud on his identity as a consecrated celibate married by vows to man in Christ on the reference point of Mary keeping in uncertainty of her belief the inseparability and qualitative equality of her consents in her present moment particular circumstances to be joined in consecrated marriages, celibate vowed to man in Christ at Lk1:38: "let it be to me", and male female at RSV Mt1:24: "Joseph ... took his wife" as inseparable and qualitatively equal.
Wow this is the best episode I've seen in a long time. You're spot on, we need courageous bishops and priests. Especially ones who are a still obedient not obstinate. Just like Bishop Strickland. Unfortunately we have the leaders we as a people deserve.
How can I Ever have a TLM when there is none near me? If TLM goes underground altogether bc of coercion, Please don’t forget to find us NO goers. 😢🙏
The intention of Francis was "to make a mess" & therefore the office of the Pope cannot be assigned & held by him.
We do not judge his heresies, but judge his intention in occupying the Chair. He declares himself in opposition of the Papal Authority passed down from Christ to Peter by his misrepresentation in carrying out the Role of Christ's Vicar on Earth.
to patriciamatthews ..., Are you complicit in the 2000-year embezzlements and fraud on vulnerable roman catholic church role group members causing the worldwide disaster of sexual abuse of children and vulnerable adults within the family?
Francis' intention as Pope is "to make a mess" of the occult as hidden, incest connected as substitute mate grooming by diseased 'familyist' family members of psychologically and or emotionally vulnerable family members in roles within the RCC role group.
This grooming is with an inducement of, or association with "higher vocation" (Pope St John Paul 2, "Guidelines", TTMHS, PCF, 1995, 35; cf. St Paul's "opinion", 1 Cor7:25-34) of consecrated celibate marriage vowed to man in Christ to consecrated male female marriage vowed to God.
It is for economic advantage of families of the groomers by tax-exemption embezzlements and lower insurance cost by fraud.
This making a mess is by the consecrated celibate marriage in which Pope Francis consents in uncertainty of his belief to be joined.
This making a mess is for out occulting this occult, incest connected evil as did Pope Francis on 17 June 2021 in his particular cases of embezzlements of his procreation role gift charity donations by ten of his Vatican state citizens/employees, including Cardinal Angelo Becciu, and an unacceptable risk of fraud on the identity of his consecrated celibate marriage by the Italian Parliament "Zan" anti-homophobia bill.
the weakness of the papal systems lies in the fact that he can.t be removed when he consistently goes off the rails. Too bad he isn.t viewed as the early church saw the office. I observe the behavior of the current claimant and notice strong signs of a personality disorder.
Gregory Wilton-- Tradition dies a bloody death.
Wilton Gregory. Almost as creepy as Cupich. Almost.
As a 72 former religious from the 70's who thanks be to God has embraced tradition I've found it necessary to acknowledge what Francis says and then ignore it to stay balanced in my spiritual life.
Dr. K is my old favorite theologian. Ecen more since his last visit to Australia...just about 2 years before COVID. When are you visiting Oz again?
Read the Litany of the Saints; any listed post vatican 2? Those saint’s listed ALL were not part of the NO.
The average time between death and canonization of a Saint is about 180 years.
I WILL NOT COMPLY.
😇
Saving my own soul the old fashion way. ✝️
Very sad to see the TLM being restricted and this is coming from someone who attends the NO mass. I’ve been to the TLM before very reverent and beautiful but very far.
52:10 I think Dr K meant the Dutch bishops opposed Fiduci Supplicans. The Belgian ones applauded it as a first step from Rome for "embracing the rainbow" fully.
If you read Fr Elijah and Dostoyevsky’s The Grand Inquisitor, this situation (inconsistencies) becomes much easier to understand.
Everybody assumes Francis' papacy is ending and he won't be around much longer. I have my doubts. Whatever bodily ailments he suffers from his mind still appears quite sharp and he could easily be around for two or three or even five more years. Maybe he will even be there to greet the Russian army when it arrives in Rome.
God deliver us!
😂
Patrick Coffin recently stated the same opinion about the Pope being censored in the future by the church, I also agree. 👍
Censured.
@@joebollig2689 “Censured”: anyway you get the drift. 🫡
Historically, it is worth remembering the reformation of the Church, first began in late 15th century Spain with Cardinal Francisco Ximenes de Cisneros leading the charge with Spanish monastic/clerical reform (not to mention the monumental Complutensian polyglot, 1517) three decades before Luther et al., His and others work in Spain led the way for some greats like St. Theresa of Avilla. The Church was in reform before the age of reformations.
Luther denied basic dogmas of the faith that made their sacraments invalid and severe the apostolic tradicion. Is that what you are comparing the movement of the Spanish Cardinal?
38:37 Plato’s Cave. TLM reminds others what we and they’re giving up.
"Pope Francis is singularly bad" .... it's so sad yet so true and we all need to pray for Him and ammend our lives because we only get the leaders we need so we can overcome our own lack
What will the priests that quit do to pay for food & lodgings?
They will get a job.
In my opinion, there's s conclusive argument against sedevacantism. So I'll post it when I can. Meanwhile, if sedevacanism is true, how can we know that a real pope replaces the imposter?
Francis declined the title Vicar of Christ - does he in his heart know he is not and gave fair warning in a moment of integrity????
No one talks about the prayer life of the Pope. Does he have one? Adoration? The Office? People use to tell stories about the prayers of the pope….
I've always thought that (ironically) what the Church needs is exactly another 'mafioso boss' to right the ship of Peter.
I'd like to challenge Eric's assessment that to declare Bergoglio is not the pope as a dangerous precedent. Bergoglio as pope who is consistently heretical especially doctrinally heretical to an unprecedented extreme ought to cause us all to be making a far more serious discernment on whether he is the pope and how that would at all be possible given the Church's doctrine on papal infallibility.
How can such an absurdity come about as shutting down the immemorial Latin Mass? This is the Passion of the Church, that's how. For that matter, how can such an absurdity come about that one of the twelve Apostles betrayed Our Lord?
In reality, *popes don't have temporal authority* outside the papal states. The authority, of popes, is moral persuasion, i.e.
spiritual authority.
We are called to be obedient to the Church dogma and Christ. Not to false prophets and heretics any more than to Satan himself.
Glad to know that you would not accept Francis as holding the Papal Office if he came out & said that God does not exist. Unfortunately there are probably many that would say that he didn't mean it so he is still Pope. 🤔
If religious assent of the intellect to the ordinary magisterium of a pope is obligatory, and religious assent of the intellect means believing that what is thus taught is true, then the only way we would never be obliged to believe a falsehood would be if God prevented the ordinary magisterium of a pope ever teaching error, i.e. if it were infallible. But ex hypothesi it is not infallible. Therefore either the obligation of religious assent of the intellect does not oblige one to believe everything thus taught, or God obliges (and therefore wants) us to believe error. If God were to do this God would want evil. Therefore, whatever the obligation of religious assent is, it does not include the duty to believe that to which "religious assent" is owed. Where is this expression "religious assent of the intellect" defined? Who introduced it? Is religious assent different than intellectual assent? Is it just thinking something like this: "If that's what the ordinary papal magisterium says, its probably true and I will conduct myself as-if it were true, until I see clear reasons to the contrary"?
I too struggle with this aspect. You stated it well, thank you.
In a rather childlike summary, the Catholic Church has always taught that no one on earth or in the next world has the authority to ask or demand that we sin. (Galatians 1 :6-10) Daily we should pray for Godly wisdom, fortitude and discernment.
I think the Pope did say that God does not exist. What exist is the Father the Son and the holy Ghost. He did say it in Spanish. He also said don't be scandalized but God does not exist
to dougpowers, yes, God is 'essence' not 'existence'. Pope Francis was correct if stating: "God does not exist". Who exist are the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit.
To “exist” as ‘existence’ and to ‘be’ or “AM WHO I AM” (Exodus 3:14) as ‘essence’ is simultaneously authorised by consecrated marriage, either celibate vowed to man in Christ or male female vowed to God, on the reference point of Mary at Lk 1: 29-45 and Mt 1: 24.
An advantageous combining is authorised simultaneously of the parts, whether roles, or roles and identity, or identities to be combined by an exercise of an absolute power.
This combining is of/in the keeping in uncertainty of belief in particular as well as in general circumstances of the inseparability and qualitative equality of procreation gift role and identity in need of union by this doing role - been identity of consecrated marriage.
This combining is of role activities, in both general and particular circumstances, as of Christ’s at Jn 6 of eucharist and consecrated marriage and for example to take a particular case among the few valid "sacramental marriages" recognised by Pope Francis on 16 June 2016 of members of my families of the consecrated marriages of my parents from 1946 in Brisbane, Australia at Toowong and then Kenmore and of my wife, Jane nee Churchill, with me from 1991.
I believe that this combining was “a fulfilment of what was spoken to her [Mary] from the Lord.” (RSV Lk 1:45).
Scripture records many such advantageous combining in general and particular circumstances as at Exodus 3:14 authorised by “I AM WHO I AM” (Yahweh as consecrated marriage of the Father and the Son in the Holy Spirit).
This combining withstands extreme tensions such as caused by occult possession at worst or incest connected obsession at best.
The roman catholic church role group Mass at the Legion of Mary (LOM) hostel chapel, Indooroopilly, Brisbane, Australia in c.2006 purported offered by Archdiocese of Brisbane Auxiliary Bishop, John Gerry, and attended by Clark family members, Colin Clark and me, and LOM personnel, Mary Mahoney and Eileen Hall, was in particular circumstances an occasion for an exorcism of Bishop Gerry by consecrated marriages of his abuse of eucharist intercommunion discipline (canon 844.4).
This abuse was allowed by Archbishop Francis Rush in giving or allowing Bishop Gerry Ordinary powers as in Bishop Gerry’s letters to me from May 1993 to March 1995, in particular occultly as predated 8 December 1994 and sent on 10 December 1994, and who was to force the sale of the hostel for purchasing the Legion of Mary property in Fortitude Valley, Brisbane, Australia.
An authorisation exercising an absolute power by a Clark family consecrated male female marriage was given in general circumstances in 1964 simultaneously at the UNO Food and Agricultural Organisation and Pope St Paul VI's Commission on Population by an employee of both for this purpose, economist/statistician, Colin Clark, joined in a consecrated male female marriage from at least April - May 1946 and in particular and general circumstances on 25 February 1991 up to 31 March 2021.
This was the reference point for Pope Francis’ consecrated celibate marriage on 17 June 2021 in both general and particular circumstances in sustaining the rights of its role in its cases of ten of its Vatican state citizens/employees, including Cardinal Angelo Becciu’s, alleged embezzlements of its procreation role gift charity donations and of the Italian state Parliament “Zan” anti-homophobia bill as an unacceptable risk of fraud on its need of union of its identity as a consecrated celibate marriage vowed to man in Christ.
This consecrated celibate marriage was on the reference point of Mary keeping in uncertainty of her belief in both her general and particular circumstances the inseparability and qualitative equality of her consecrated marriages, celibate and male female, at RSV Lk 1:29-45 and RSV Mt 1:24.
Twenty bishops: "No, I am Spartacus!", ... if only 😢
Meanwhile the American bishops are quiet as church mice. They are fearful of the iron fisted Cd. C. Pierre coming down on them and giving them The Strickland Treatment.
Wished the good bishops would network and resist PF en masse. If they made their written/spoken resistence together I think it would be more difficult to just knock off 20 bishops at one fell swoop. And even if PF did pull it off, it becomes a "loud sermon" to the Catholic world that we have a dictator pope and therefore flee the heretical Synodal church. It would certainly rouse or wake up some more of the laity. Maybe the good bishops en masse should meet in one room and make a Resistance Speech on video. Bet it would go viral.
The example of St.Peter the first Pope is enough. How humble he was to accept that he was wrong when told by St.Paul. Was St.Paul disobedient to the Pope? No infact his obedience to God first made him do it.First God then, mortal men.There is a vast difference between the annointed, matryed apostles & popes of early church & today. If laity can make out the difference how come the clergy & some blind followers dont get it? The word of God is the same yesterday, today, and forever. And nobody can dare change anything. If anyone attempts it, then they are ANTICHRIST.
Do we need to get together whit the FREEMANSORY Cardinal Mafia of Saint Gallen ?
FINGERS OF CHATOLIC CHURCH JISUS SAYED THA GATE OF HELL WIL NOT PREVAIL OVER MAY CHURCH JISUS IS IN COMAND UNDER HOLLY GOD THE FATHER SUPERVISION
Bergoglio is not pope. Criticize him all you want. There is no such thing as a “Pope Emeritus,” who wears white, the red shoes, and the papal ring. The guy who does that is pope until he dies. A pope who thinks he is a Pope Emeritus, has not validly resigned. A conclave while there is still a pope is not valid. And so, Mr. Bergoglio, who denies the title “Vicar of Christ,” and signs his name “Jorge Bergoglio,” knows he is not pope, never was pope, and tells us in so many ways he is not pope.
How disheartening, that you all would find it acceptable to just move on and elect a pope who will dismantle the church more slowly! That is not nearly good enough. You can’t just move on and pretend this attack on the church didn’t happen and let the lavender mafia continue their SRA, but just a little slower. Do you really not see the spiritual stakes? We will never get to some magical time in fifty years when there is a traditionalist pope. That is just whistling past the graveyard.
to josephcillojr, Are you complicit in the 2000-year embezzlements and fraud on vulnerable roman catholic church role group members causing the worldwide disaster of sexual abuse of children and vulnerable adults within the family?
Francis' intention as Pope is "to make a mess" of the occult as hidden, incest connected as substitute mate grooming by diseased 'familyist' family members of psychologically and or emotionally vulnerable family members in roles within the RCC role group.
This grooming is with an inducement of, or association with "higher vocation" (Pope St John Paul 2, "Guidelines", TTMHS, PCF, 1995, 35; cf. St Paul's "opinion", 1 Cor7:25-34) of consecrated celibate marriage vowed to man in Christ to consecrated male female marriage vowed to God.
It is for economic advantage of families of the groomers by tax-exemption embezzlements and lower insurance cost by fraud.
This making a mess is by the consecrated celibate marriage in which Pope Francis consents in uncertainty of his belief to be joined.
This making a mess is for out occulting this occult, incest connected evil as did Pope Francis on 17 June 2021 in his particular cases of embezzlements of his procreation role gift charity donations by ten of his Vatican state citizens/employees, including Cardinal Angelo Becciu, and an unacceptable risk of fraud on the identity of his consecrated celibate marriage by the Italian Parliament "Zan" anti-homophobia bill.
Dr. K isn't stupid. Far from it. Why he's choosing to tear down the papacy to avoid the obvious reality of the situation, I'll never understand in this life.
@@john_wesley_walsh
I believe he sees that his livelihood depends on defending the Bergoglian papacy as legitimate and just getting back to normal. But, in doing so, he will advocate dismantling the papacy to avoid another Bergoglio, which is exactly what Satan wants. Keep your eyes on the Satanic goal: destroying the Church. Changing anything while the Church is under this diabolical influence is a mistake. Everything that has happened needs to be reversed.
People who make their living with a Church sailing smoothly will want to cover up what has happened and just get back to sailing smoothly. The boat needs to go into dry dock and we need the pirates to walk the plank. We can’t let the pirates choose another captain and be satisfied if they retrim the sails.
We must avoid the temptation to turn the world upside down to make Bergoglio seem like a legitimate pope.
You are wrong.Pope abdicated in the past and Pope Benedict made clear that is what he was doing.
@@ryanscottlogan8459
So, we have had popes who, after resigning, continued wearing white, the papal ring, the red shoes and continued to give apostolic blessings in the past? Name one…
Benedict knew very well the proper form of a resignation, but failed to follow it. Why?
Find a TLM? Have you no awareness of the vastness of the west? Your directive to find a Latin mass may end up inviting people to just leave. Argh!
GOOD SUBJECT BUT THE FIRST 4 minutes THAT YOU WERE ROLLICKING WAS FRUSTRATING..
The title is an oxymoron. Communion with the Catholic Church requires faith. This is nonsense.
You do not get away with calling our Holy Father: scandalous, tyrannical, and corrupt and then still claim he’s the Pope. If he’s all these things, then he cannot be the Pope.
Every Pope, including Francis, is promised by Jesus the grace of never-failing faith. “I have prayed for thee (Peter) that thy faith fail not” - Luke 22:32. A Pope does not receive a “charge of grace” just at their election, then they get to decide whether to cooperate with it or not. God continues to give this grace to His Successor of Peter, as promised by Jesus, until death or retirement (as with Benedict). If this is not the case, then Jesus is a liar, which He cannot be.
Christ did not establish a Church Militant (with Peter as its head on earth) to bust down the gates of hell to save all people, but then contradict Himself by allowing His Successor of Peter to fall into grave error, scandal, tyranny, and corruption. What a dirty trick that would be!
Ponder this: God said “let there be light”, and there was light. Jesus said, “this is My Body”, and indeed it is His Body. Jesus also said, “I have prayed for thee (Peter) that thy faith fail not” - The Word has spoken and we are called to believe The Word.
Tell me you don’t know the history of popes without actually telling me.
@@CrisisMag Yes, a conclave of sinners elects a sinner to be Pope. That is true. At the moment he accepts the papacy, God gives this sinner the grace of never failing faith until either he dies or retires. Again, see Luke 22:32. God prevents His Pope from proclaiming heresy, apostasy, or idolatry -- since Jesus Himself promised us His Church will lead us to eternal life. If you think Pope Francis is indeed one or more of these, then either he's not the Pope, or you are wrong about him and wrong about what God is trying to accomplish through Francis.
The Pope can still commit sin and say many things not pertaining to the faith, such as global warming, the jab, etc, that we need not agree. But, when it comes to the faith that is not so, thanks be to God and God alone. No Pope, while he is pope, will lead the faithful astray. And God does not expect the faithful to know the history of every Pope. Thankfully, He makes the faith available to everyone, simple or well-educated... He simply asks us to trust Him and trust His Church He established for our salvation. So, is Luke 22:32 true or not?
And don't think you can disregard non-infallible statements. See Donum Vertitatis Article 17, given by Ratzinger and approved by JPII, May 24, 1990: "...magisterial decisions in matters of discipline, even if they are not guaranteed by the charism of infallibility, are not without divine assistance and call for the adherence of the faithful." This line is from a serious document by a brilliant and faithful theologian, and approved by a Saint.
Mr. Sammons, it seems like you want to believe this truth, but are burdened with these grave errors. Mr. Kwasniewski, I'm not sure. You seem pretty hunkered down about your position.
I think this pope has proven that he can use his position to try to destroy the church. This is the test to sort the wheat from the chaff. This pope defies Jesus Himself. What more do you need to see?
@@Fiat.Voluntas.Tua22 You are wrong about the Pope. God would never allow His Successor of Peter to use his position to destroy the Church. You must read Francis's documents, homilies, letters for yourself. I thought that way too for a few years, until God gave me the grace to research and verify things for myself. Thanks be to God.
@@RobertC-1966 Did God approve of ‘His Successor of Peter’ appointing to the second highest position in the Vatican an ‘author’ who wrote about a teenage girl dreaming of sex on the beach with Jesus?