Sergeant Orders Officer to RESPECT Citizen's Rights
Vložit
- čas přidán 6. 10. 2021
- Second Channel: / @johnlang6593
Patreon: / audittheaudit
Twitter: / audittheaudit
Submit your videos here: auditheaudit@gmail.com
Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellify.com
Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.
This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.
Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.
FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.
Original video: • You WILL be Arrested! ...
Police State: New Jersey’s channel: / @policestatenewjersey
Sources:
N.J. Stat. § 2C:29-1- bit.ly/39QAuHG
State v. Crawley- bit.ly/3CW36Ms
State v. Williams- bit.ly/2ZvXzO4
Bryant v. Camden County Police Department- bit.ly/3ov8PVF
Brown v. Texas- bit.ly/3p1SKDr
Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada- bit.ly/3nYdxIV
United States v. Sokolow- bit.ly/3CSabxu
N.J. Stat. § 2C:29-3- bit.ly/3m0N4tC
Hindering Model Jury Instructions- bit.ly/3CWCtXw
State v. Aad- bit.ly/3APGv3y
Article- bit.ly/3lQZxQw
It goes without saying that Sergeant Ruiz gets an A+ here! Check out my second channel for more content: czcams.com/channels/lTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw.html
He even gave out the name and badge number of the officer when the officer refused.
Crazy to me that the officer can illegally demand ID in this case while illegally refusing to give his name and badge number
If i didn't think I'd get murdered the first week, I'd like to be a Auditor.
Why does the sergeant get an A+ but not the journalist? What could the journalist have done better?
@@devonmarr9872 It's not illegal to refuse to hand out your badge/ID as a cop. But it's usually against department policy.
@@mathwizard10 "I always have my ID on me."
"I don't have my ID."
Contradictory statements. While not a huge huge deal it is still something to avoid so that is why I think he shouldn't get the +
"You need to identify yourself because you're suspicious."
"Suspicious is not a crime."
"That's not the point."
Lol what?
Ha exactly, thought the same thing
he clarifies pretty nicely I thought , He said this guy was reported as suspicious , which lets be honest , These people who sit outside courthouses and record nothing for hours are actually suspicious. Imagine some weirdo standing outside the court house for hours waving a camera around and not talking to anyone passing.
@@Alexander-ry6ri being muslim is enough to have nypd fbi detain. spy and fabricate some may say it's suspicious. but it's not illegal
@@Alexander-ry6ri thanks for your opinion but it’s wrong bottom line is the law says he can stand there all day all night everyday period….
@@Alexander-ry6ri
I totally get that, but, legally speaking, that's still not enough to demand someone to identify themselves.
"We investigated ourselves and determined we did nothing wrong."
"The matter is being investigated and addressed as any other incidents that have come to our attention"
Ah, so it isn't
@@warriorgp4640 it's going to be said as many times as law enforcement agencies pull this shit and refuse to hold their own accountable. Sorry it's so annoying
@@warriorgp4640 Very often cliches have a basis in reality. In this case, the Police Chief stated the matter was being investigated. Yet it's unclear what, if any, disciplinary action was taken in response to this incident. It's possible that the Police Chief came down hard on this officer, but it's also very possible there was little or even no action taken against the officer. Because how does that cliche go again?
@@__sm1441 It is annoying. But you know what’s more annoying? Not being able to trust our folks in blue because some of em do shit like this and NEVER held responsible.
@@warriorgp4640 sounds as though, you have an issue with the actual law..hopefully you are not a member of law enforcement, and if you are, learn the law, and follow it..That's what you are paid to do...
That sergeant is a hero. He de-escalated the situation in less than 1 minute and put the citizen's rights above his officer's ego. A+++
A++ tops. 3 plusses requires the officers to wash your car or give you a bj.
He supported, defended and preserved the Constitution of the United States, as he took an oath to do. I've reminded a few cops of that oath from time to time. I took the same oath, and it never expires.
But he didn't get a grade on the video.....
WHY are SO many people just A-holes; uncooperative, immature, instigating A-hole$ behaving like petulant toddlers?!?!?!
And there are throngs more morons applauding the behavior, absolutely astonishing 🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️
It is amazing how quickly these situations can be ended just by the officer knowing the law.
Even if officers are annoyed by auditors, and some of them are really annoying on purpose, if you follow they law they have nothing they can do.
Dude literally said his superior was wrong when he HIMSELF was 100% incorrect. That is a special kind of entitlement, cockyness, and disrespect. Officer M is dangerous. He needs to get fired. This is just the beginning of him being a tyrant.
Facts. Ppl like this literally go out of their way to be police officers for this reason- to strong aem ppl. It's disgusting. He's such a loser.
Yea the fact he would not give his name and badge number after he was found wrong just shows a really bad ego problem that will eventually get him in trouble. The only good thing was he did not get to the point of acrually arresting him. Some cops would have by this point. But I do not understand why these cops are not trained better at this.
He will get his azz kick some day some how because of his high EGOS 😊
Funny how egos & respect don’t go hand in hand’s 😮 POS 😅
"I hope you learned something today" that probably hurt him down to his testicle. 🤣
Just the one testicle, not the other one😂😂
@@popeshabba4266 with his behavior he probably only has one.
@@h1de Mangina ?
@@MartyP-lr7vw lol yes but with one drooping testicle 🤣🤣
@@MartyP-lr7vw Old Greg
Omg the humiliation must be unbearable, the sergeant literally crushed his officer's ego
Rightfully so!
@@JokesRJokes 10 to 1 , he went home and kicked the dog and beat his wife .
Well-read, let's just say his flying eagle turned out to be a half dead buzzard roosting on a rock.
And he was still trying to talk over his sarg.
TWICE
Are you serious? That idiot is getting $118K a year for being a public nuisance with a badge? He should be fired. Kudos to the sergeant for quickly and accurately assessing the situation and de-escalating. We need more cops like Sergeant Ruiz.
" should be "
The sergeant should get an A+ for knowing the law, defusing the situation and not blindly backing up the officers spurious 'logic'.
"Hope you learned something today"
That was savage, and I'm here for it.
this is officer ballsack
“Lex Fridman is dangerous” 18 min inspirational video on CZcams ends w the poem “if” by R Kipling
I’m sure he didn’t learn nothing smh
Now you need to leave
“You’re not in trouble.” If the cop has already decided he is not in trouble why even instigate an interaction?
because he "got a call", law enforcements' catchall to violate rights.
It's a blatant lie. Nothing unusual here.
NJ cops itch at any opportunity to ticket citizens. They’re the kinda cops that hide in bushes waiting for people to drive 5 mph over the speed limit.
They also love young drivers if you live near urban communities. Cops will create any story to pull over kids thinking they have drugs. Especially if your a white kid in predominately black community.
@@sammybubba176
No one called the police like he said
@@3twelve206 or vice-versa
I love how his boss just walks over and overruled him. So sweet
I’ve always been pro police for 52 years and the last two years I have no respect for law-enforcement anymore. Especially with cameras coming out especially my local Sheriffs Dept. They are absolutely horrible. I commend everybody that stands up for their rights. It’s the most important thing we have now in the United States and we’re losing them every day.
So you are a exbootlicker how did it worked out 52 years knowing you supported in a system that ruined innocent lives by lies on police reports 😮
The scary part is this officer thinks he is 100 percent right and doesn't know the law.
And what's more scary is that you can see in the first officers face he still thinks he is right and will continue to do the same exact thing to others that don't know their rights are being trampled, regardless of more training.
I know, it's crazy. I used to think they were all just lying when it comes to stuff like this, but the more you see it, you can tell they don't know. Really makes me wonder how many people get unjustly arrested and end up pleading guilty, either for a deal or just to get it over with.
I wonder if he even can read
@@Dzimon350 no he can't read.
What's more scary, officer Brutus will defend his 100% certainty all the way back to the police station with the perpetrator in tow.
"You're making this more difficult than it needs to be."
And there it is!
The presumptuous; I have every right because I have the badge and gun and you're just the inferior small guy that's supposed to bow to my will attitude. It's sickening.
Based on the supervisor's response, I get the feeling the officer is the department fok-up, a "Special" guy who keeps a short hair cut so he doesn't injure himself with his comb.
Also, this cop in particular has a record of violence towards others he's "investigated." He should be stripped and jailed pending an investigation.
He is literally creating the difficulty
The "you're making me beat you" defense. Cops use abuser logic all the time
@Aniello M. Rapists*
First thing to ask when being told by a cop that "Somebody called in to report you as suspicious", is "I want the name and address of the person who accused me of being suspicious, so that I can sue them in a court of law for slandering my good name and bringing me into disrepute".
That’s a great point!!
This!! Defamation of character!!
So, I am so tired of hearing these cops say suspicious suspicion. I'm sick of it.
There is likely a system generated record number attached to each call. They should have to provide that so you can verify it.😂
A cop’s favorite line when doing something he shouldn’t is “you’re making this harder than it needs to be.” Yes I am. I’m making it harder for you to abuse your power. Cry about it tyrant
It's the rapist mentality kicking in. "You're making this harder than it needs to be" is what rapists say.
Here, here.
@@drewmesiano7602 How about the officer do his job correctly and not insist on violating people's rights.
"Thank you for answering my questions. Be sure to stay on the sidewalk and mind the signs that limit access to certain parts of the property."
Both go on their way in this scenario too and no cops needlessly violate any citizen's right to privacy.
@@drewmesiano7602 What perp? If cops treat everyone as criminals, we lose our rights.
He was taking pictures, legally. And answered all questions, respectfully. Officers to not have a right to identify every single person they ever encounter, simply to 'have the encounter on record'.
If the officer did his job legally and correctly, this encounter would have been smooth and quick. HE is responsible for the extended encounter NOT the citizen just going about his business, doing nothing wrong.
@@SteveMKoch FACTS!!
11:02 The Sergeant's face when he realises how dumb his officer is is priceless:
- "Frank, Frank, Frank, just hold on a second"
I TAKE MY HAT OFF, FOR THE SERGEANT,....AND LET HIM KNOW THAT I APRECIATED,...HIS RESPECT FOR THE CITIZEN,....
Frank would’ve loaded the Jews on the trains without question. Clearly he lacks any kind of intelligence or respect for civil rights.
@@climber950 well said.
Where is the training? Wtf they are doing w our tax money? Educate these mofos and cameras on while on duty.
@@rosavillavicencio7868 :God Bless the Sergeant, he is true to His Oath of Honor and shows Respect for the Private-Sector Citizens and Private-Sector Taxpayers, and Private-Sector Voters. We need more like him, that shows Respect for the Police "Oath of Honor"...
$118,130? WTF.
just think how many times this officer violates citizens' rights on any given day.
But this Time it was on camera & he was corrected but his high EGOS still won’t let it go the failed to identify as a officer speak high volume about him
"Hope you learned something today" 💀💀💀 A+ for this citizen to defend his rights, and get in a few verbal jabs, but staying respectful.
@@loveurlife4ever1 Dude. Stop spamming.
Truth hurts the stupid!!
best part 😂
Only in Jersey. ;-)
They are nothing more than hired ignorant criminal gestapo thugs,employed by a corrupt dictatorship tyrannical government
"Have a good day officer...hope YOU learned something today" the icing on the cake lol
Yep just goes to show how petty and arrogant this guy is
@@garbageparade5144 Only person arrogant was the pig, not the citizen.
@@jw7665 I said what I said
@@garbageparade5144 No worries, I can smell the bacon on you
@@garbageparade5144 He only gave Ofc. Moschella the same level of respect he was given. You want to talk about arrogance. Ofc. Moschella wouldn't even acknowledge that Sgt. Ruiz was correct. You want to talk about petty. Ofc. Moschella tried making up BS to get this man's info and then was all pissy when challenged. Then at the end of all this he wouldn't even give his name (which is required). So it seems that Ofc. Moschella likes to enforce the law, threaten with the law, but not follow it. But the man behind the video is petty and arrogant, sure buddy.
118 thousand dollars a year is paid to an officer that has no concept the actual law that he was trying to arrest someone for? What other business or company would keep someone employed that has no idea how to do their job.
One important lesson I’m learning from these videos is to learn much more about the amendment’s rights and my state’s laws. Thank you to this and other similar channels for educating us!
To show how out of control his ego was, he attempted to correct his supervisor when the supervisor corrected him!
ya I seen that. said supervisor was wrong.
@@BrokefishN and he's probably been violating rights from day one .
To me, this is one of the critical factors in judging the officers ability to conduct himself in a proper manner while carrying out his duties. To opening challenge a superior like that is proof that he he has difficulty even controlling himself.
The one thing I have trouble understanding, lieutenants, captains, sergeants, corporals. But not following orders is very worrisome, telling your sergeant that he is wrong is not going to help this idiots career.
@@lamorgan2006 he is an idiot. He will get nothing but raises and promotions.
Cop: “You are making this more difficult than it needs to be.”
Citizen: “Honoring your oath to NOT violate my Constitutional rights is NEVER a difficulty.”
No action taken
Blue line action taken blue line
@@charlesferguson7421 ? 🙄
So this cop is initially responding to hearsay. Then He needs the ID only for the purpose of CYA. Just in case something happens later.
I love when the cops can't actually quote any law, they're just like "I don't like the things you're doing" like that matters in the slightest.
The look on that cop’s face at the end says everything. Absolutely infuriated and red-eyed with rage over the fact that he had to follow his oath, check his planet-sized ego and respect a citizen’s rights. The HORROR.
That is the disconnect right there. Every citizen is just a statistic to them. They only care about themselves and their inflated pensions.
Mediterraneans really don't belong in North America. They do not have the spirit of freedom.
And this fool really said that the law had nothing to do with the law 🤦♀️ I wonder if he has any working brain cells left up there if it’s just got crayons stuck up there like Homer Simpsons.
The guy who filmed this is an instigator and a piece of crap human. All he is trying to do is rile up the police so he can become famous. He's only there to try and piss people off.
@@tonyrains217 Sorry but we're allowed to exist in our country.
@@tonyrains217 yeah well, he was just filming where he's allowed to be. The officer has the option to not be instigated. You have nothing but tyranny to back up your perspective.
The sargeant knew he was a tyrant from previous behaviour and SHUT HIM STRAIGHT DOWN needs sacking before he kills someone.
I agree with this, absolutely
He's definitely going to murder someone for something petty like not stroking his ego 🙄 💀 😒
I appreciate your objectivity in content. I feel like I am being blasted by videos of officer misconduct, with mimimal coverage of those doing their jobs well. Thank you for providing coverage of officers staying true to their oath.
That officer defied his own supervisor, in public, and refused to comply with his own department’s policies.
He should be on probation, and should always be accompanied by an officer Senior to him.
Agree. That was the most scary part for me.
The script that police have memorized is amazing…” you’re making this more difficult than this has to be” anytime someone exercises their rights
Lmfao seriously. their like
“oh shit he knows his rights what do I do now..?”
Making this more difficult for who exactly......the narcissism is real
Maybe more difficult than it _needs_ to be, but not more difficult than his rights permit him to make it.
Cops need to understand that the constitution is first and foremost intended to be a collection of defensive rights to protect civilians and make law enforcement jobs harder _on purpose._
And the “suspicions person calls” l
Damn straight I am. You think I'm just gonna lay down and let you walk all over my rights? You're gonna have to work for this one pal.
That poor officer, he just wanted to harass private citizens and go on with his day but he ran into someone who knew what the law actually is
This piece of garbage does this all day every day.
@@ScanManDaMurka he absolutely does
… and outranked him. If they were the same rank, it wouldn’t have ended there.
@@ScanManDaMurka I bet he waves the thin blue line flag all day and acts like an asshole 24/7
Nope
Trading for sovereign idiots
I got pulled over by him a couple of years ago. He yelled and berated me the entire time. I tried telling him that I'm not from NJ and did not know that it was an illegal left turn, and he barked at me that "it doesn't matter where you're from! It's the same thing everywhere!" My wife and I were pretty traumatized from that interaction...
As a 911 operator, I took literally thousands of calls from people reporting someone "suspicious." So I would always ask them, "Why are they suspicious? What are they doing?" A lot of times, people would answer that they just "didn't like the way that person looked." I would tell them that's not suspicious in the least, because people can look however they want. And I would tell them to give me specifics as to WHAT they were doing that was making them suspicious. If they couldn't articulate it, I would send an officer to talk to the caller, which ended up being labeled an "educational contact." You can't call the cops because a black man is walking down your public sidewalk, or someone is making a video on the public sidewalk. BUT if someone is taking pictures of your children in your yard, yeah, that's a reason to send someone out.
thanks for doing your job properly
Honestly, I'd just hang up.
@@major_kukri2430 too much liability in just hanging up. I could have been fired for hanging up on someone and not sending officers. And too often someone does call for what sounds like a ridiculous reason but it turns out to be a real emergency situation where they couldn't talk freely. I had to take every call seriously, even when I had the repeat callers.
@@elizabethcompton738 I get that, but you're not telling me that after the fifth call of a Karen reporting a black man for "walking suspiciously" that the idea of hanging up didn't cross your mind.
The sergeant was like:"ah shit, another unexperienced cop arguing with a dude with a camera, why y'all youngster keep falling for that?!" Ended it under a minute and saved that cops ass.
If only other "inexperienced" people could make nearly $120K annually. 12:30
To be paid that much to do a job, don't you think you should know more about the rules/laws of that job and behave accordingly?
@@lareh5501 Go for it! Try it, there are so many freaking laws it's nearly impossible to know all of them at the spot when u need them, what u talking about describes a lawyer or judge, not an cop.
There is more to be a cop then just knowing the laws like a Asperger kid.
@@headintheclouds999 That's probably why it takes 4-5 years to become a police officer in most European countries, because legal education is at least 60-70% of the education. If you can become a police officer in less than a year you don't have a versatile education covering, the law, psychology, anthropology, martial arts, etc., what you have if you can get a badge in less than one year is NOT an education. It's a course!
Where I live it is also a requirement that police officers regularly renew their exams and that they stay physically fit and that they at all times are able to pass all their original exams as well as the training course. That's the reason you see very few of these vulgarly obese and sweaty police officers in Europe as you do in the US. (Of course you can find a few bad apples in some European countries too, but the rate are significantly smaller.)
Police in Denmark (where I live) also film all interactions with citizens (like in the US), but furthermore they inform citizens that it is their right to videotape or make an audio recording of the entire altercation, in some instances even encourage it, as that would only serve as a protection of both parties, as that will provide them with an extra piece of evidence that establish if any of the recordings have been tampered with.
@@headintheclouds999 Then why do they get paid so much for knowing so little? Waste of taxes IMO
@@headintheclouds999 It's nearly impossible if you don't have any real training. Anywhere in the developed world cops undergo many years of training so that incidents like these do not happen. Sadly the US has a very lackluster training program for cops and so such incidents are extremely common and the reason why cops hurt and kill more people than many criminals do.
This sergeant is one in a million,honest and brave hopefully his job is safe ,the US public needs more officers like him,God bless him.
Exactly, and the institutions hate guys like these.
Yes
@@Syncopia And that Good Ma'am or Sir, is exactly the perfect point of the whole matter in a nutshell...Thank You for Your Eloquent Expression...
Sad that the standard is so low. He literally was just doing his job - but amongst so many bad cops that makes him a hero!! SMH
Especially in leadership positions. That's how you really make positive incremental change, because they will train officers to conduct themselves professionally, then they will then become leaders and the cycle continues.
He needs to be fired ASAP
$110,000 a year to be completely wrong.
I love this!! "That's actually incorrect in that respect." "I'm clear, you're clear, is he clear?" "So now your Sergeant is wrong?" Man, that cop is on a serious power trip that even when his Sergeant says there's no criminal offense, the cops says that actually not correct. I love the way the Sergeant came up, asked a question, got the answer and totally diffused the situation.
it's not power tripping anymore; it's trying desperately to salvage a wounded ego
@@xdavidliu sadly that a common flaw of human ego, not cop ego. argue with anyone on anything, and 3/10 people will never give up their side no matter how wrong they are. it just gets more dangerous with humans in positions of authority, especially when they're trained by mercenary companies pretending to be police training companies who use urban combat tactics like shock and awe, intimidation, domination of the scene and subjects, and forced compliance. horribly approach to instruction by the evil corportations selected by our political leaders is 50% of the problem. sets up the whole stage, perspective, and rapport into an adversarial and hostile situation from the get go. innately dysfunctional and immoral.
The need to play God is strong with the small little grunts.
"In case something turns into something." This tyrant is a genius. Sadly, he's probably still a cop.
Is that not prior restraint? And also negates, innocent until proven guilty?
That was the most absurd statement the cop made. You hear this all the time from LEO's who don't know the law so they fabricate the most absurd situations, in case this turns into that which can become something else that can then be....blah, blah, blah.
That cop is so full of shit that it's coming out of his ears.
And still making $118,000
And that's a constant excuse they use, "in case something goes down."
“Lex Fridman is dangerous” 18 min inspirational video on CZcams ends w the poem “if” by R Kipling
Credit where it’s due. Sergeant Ruiz has a conscience built from knowledge and morals. What a fine example of an honourable and righteous man 👍🏻
The look in his face when he took that “L”. 😂
Gotta give the SGT. an A+. He didn’t need to discuss with his officer how to try to make a legal arrest, just listened to what was going on and did the right and legal thing. He should also get props for giving up the officers info as well as his own.
The sergeant is equally responsible for the behavior of his officer that he observed and would share the same liability if he allowed it to go on
No. He was a bit of a dick too. No need to give directions about what he can and can’t do.
@@BeefyTime1 He wasn't being a dick, he was trying to keep the situation from escalating further. Providing further information to the citizen so that he knew to avoid certain areas and not give the 1st officer grounds to actually arrest or detain him.
@@rogerm3708 I would generally agree but not this time. There were times I've tried to put someone out of uniform that was my subordinate, but couldn't. Then when that person brings unwanted attention to the force my superiors would ask, what have you (me) done to train this person? My comment was always, "look in his/her review files, if I had my way he/she would have been gone a long time ago and we wouldn't be in this mess or having this discussion".
It appears to me that this SGT stopped this just in time. Mr. State nearly became an injured, and possibly wealthy man. And I have a funny feeling that the SGTs superiors was not happy with the SGT. Especially given the way the chief swept it under the rug. The AtA said it perfectly about this cop. My opinion, he's a bully and gets a rush on his ability to hurt someone Knowing they won't defend themselves and are not allowed to defend themselves.
@Sean Pushor EXACTLY WHAT I THOUGHT. SUPERVISOR. Walked up, asked a simple question and CORRECTED his BOY, that he was wrong and to move on. The SUPERVISOR GETS AN A+
Man, I feel bad for the next person this officer has an interaction with
No shit. He is going to get his pound of flesh somehow. That is a look of pain and bottled rage. He is going to fvck something or somebody up.
yeah his wife is gonna hate life.
His husband
@@rickperez375 😂😂🤣🤣🤣
@@wintermoon5442 Unfortunately you're probably not wrong. I have a lot of cops in my family and they definitely take out their frustrations on their wives and kids 😔
It should be law that they have to play those calls in a way that protects the callers identity because we all know about 80% of these calls don't exist.
I would just say "I am under no legal obligation to assist you in your investigation, especially if you are investigating me".
Why wasn’t the Sergeant given a grade? He de-escalated the situation beautifully. He should be commended for handling the situation so professionally. A+ for the Sergeant.
Why? he didn't reprimand nor take any action against his tyrant officer.
He gave him a grade as a pinned comment
@@mctie8040 he should have called out that grade in the video.
@Phuck CZcams no, cops are there to enforce made up laws, break real laws and use abuser logic. You are correct in they aren't here to entertain us.
Sergeant gets a C. He did a great job of de-escalation, but he should have reprimanded the officer in front of the victim. It doesn't require anything much, just "if you insist on illegally arresting this guy I'll be forced to arrest *you*."
"For failing to properly train him."
Respectfully, training isn't the issue. Cops like him often know damn well what they're doing, but figure they can get away with it. More often than not, they do. If cops like him were held more accountable, the lack of training would cease being a problem.
And I doubt "someone called in to report a suspicious person". I bet that was a blatant lie. Police are told they can lie and I've noticed that many of them have no problem doing so. It's unnerving.
It's always seems like the thing they lack training in seem to be the 1st things you would learn as a cop.
Well I think training is also suppose to weed these morons out. You know "you don't pass training you don't get job" type of deal.
And it's usually the trainers that teach them this sort of conduct. This kinda attitude and sense of superiority comes from the top down. Especially since this man has a history.
@@LunaS043 Cops are trained in verbal judo just as they are trained how to manipulate people with lies and intimidation, and let's not forget their extensive training in pain compliance techniques. Training is by it's very nature a top down process.
These rogue cops should need a warrant signed by a judge to be able to ask for i.d.
“I hope you learned something today”. Gold. Pure gold.
That’s our Jersey smartass for you, lol. Absolutely love it!!!
I LOVE THAT
I love it when police officers say "you're not in any trouble but ..."
The minute you hear that, you know that the officer is not acting in good faith.
Last time an officer started a conversation like that with me, i replied.. you're trespassed from my property, get off it.
I’ve watched several of your videos and I complement you on the high quality of content, editing and overall production. I’ve noticed a theme with these auditors. They seem to be fishing for a conflict to record for their own YT channels. The police officers seem to take the bait and engage in a power struggle. The Sgt demonstrated the proper way to de escalate a situation.
$118k to endanger the public and frame innocent civilians.
Its clear Officer Mascara's ego wouldnt let him walk away from this interaction . Spot on audit as usual .
He had that hallway bully demeanor about him. Bet he played football for his high school team.
It's clear another clown harassing police officers trying to do their job.
These clowns are not journalist.
They need to stop claiming that they are and using that constitutional right.
This video shows exactly how these clowns lie. Rather having to show it or not.
@@ralphtrynor9719 Journalists exist to show the rest of us the world as it really is. We are now truly seeing cops for the pigs they are. Making up lies to satisfy their egos. Too bad you got your nose stuck so far up their a**es.
@@ralphtrynor9719 "It's clear another clown harassing police officers trying to do their job. " Did the cop approach the auditor or the other way around ? Yeah that answer is obvious . Could you explain how it is a police officers job to violate citizens civil right because i thought their job was to enforce laws . "They need to stop claiming that they are and using that constitutional right." 1 st amendment rights apply to every citizen and legal alien not just to people employed by a corporate media outlet . The supreme court had to established this because it was questioned by egotistical authoritarians and stupid people . Which category do you fit under ? "This video shows exactly how these clowns lie. " Yes these 🤡 do lie and Mascara's superior confirmed it .
@@RobertSmith-lg7jp wasn't the cop responding to a call, right. (HIS JOB) or did he just go up to him for no reason. Or did auditor provoke the encounter.
Now did the auditor go where he knew that he was going to encounter police officers. The answer is yes.
We all know that they do. You're lying if you say they don't.
So try again but with something with some common sense.
Gotta love how most of these piggies start throwing out bogus charges when their authority is challenged.
All their ever wanting to do is exercise their "authority" over anyone they come into contact with.. it's a known fact that when you give someone the power to police over other people, they will naturally develop a prejudice against the person's they police
The way he said “sure sarge!” when the sgt asked him if he’s clear 😂😂
"Hope you learned something today" had me dead
Anyone requiring adult supervision to conduct their job in a professional manner, especially when they are expected to understand and uphold the law while carrying a gun, is clearly unfit for that duty.
From my experience, most adults need adult supervision. That's why we have leaders.
@@TRDiscordian If you think our current crop of "in charges" are leaders... good luck with that. Kind of explains how officer short dick got hired.
@@TRDiscordian You fail to understand what a leader is. You have it confused with supervisor.
Well said.
@@TRDiscordian I think his point was that, police officers should have a higher degree of professionalism and intelligence. They certainly should know the laws, if they are in a position to uphold said laws.
So yeah, burger King employees need leaders, but in theory, police shouldn't, at least not as much that has been shown throughout time.
When a cop argues and argues they know they're on shaky ground.
Exactly - I think this is the department fok up, if he was confident he was in the right, he would have arrested the auditor.
In what world does a cop deserve 120,000 a year especially if they don't know what they are doing
"hope you learned something today"
"nope, I'm a cop"
As a now retired lawyer I have been asking myself, judges, and prosecutors for over 45 years, "Why can't the police obey the law? and, '' why don't the police know basic laws?". When I was a prosecutor I held a force wide, mandatory attendance, "Legal updates" seminar for my PD. I lasted there for 15 years.
Yeah it’s bad when police departments get RICO’d by the FBI New Jersey is known for corrupt police.
I still don't know why that isn't part of their training. How are you expected to uphold laws if you don't know them?
I can't decide if these officers are really stupid or arrogant. These auditors have been doing this for years now.
The officers have bodycams. EVERYBODY has camera phones.
Even if they probably won't have to face any meaningful consequences.
Don't they feel any shame?.
You sir are a legend. Thank you!
You're a rare prosecutor. I'd like to know, why is it more important to get a conviction rather then getting the right person or giving someone the correct charge?
The look on his face when his sergeant said he didn't need to show identification, priceless.
if only more 1s amendment auditors were like this guy and actually understood the 1st amendment
$118k a year to treat law abiding citizens like this? Seriously?
Supervisor deserves an A+ for calmly assessing the situation in a non bias manner and determining that the citizen was well within his rights and also stepping in to provide identification for both him and his officer
No he doesn't....he was arrogant and patronizing. He took 0 time to address the actual issue (his officer not knowing basic law and threatening a citizen with arrest) and was off-putting to Mr. State. Sure he told him he could video and take pictures but didn't do his job
I strongly suspect he knew it was a first amendment audit and was trying to get out of the situation without a lawsuit. Given his condescension and unwillingness to reprimand the officer I'm guessing this plays out differently if it isn't filmed.
*Assessing the situation* - 10:58 Supervisor should have first asked his officer for his reasonable suspicion, not question the detainee, and then end the detention promptly - supervisor extended an already illegal detention.
*Provide Officers' Info* - likely a requirement, and later covering for the officer.
C for the supervisor.
@@Djatrak03, do you think it is the supervisor's job to admonish the officer in public? He completely undercut the officer and embarrassed him thoroughly. By identifying hik when the officer refused to identify he finished him off.
@@Djatrak03 Uh, no? Disciplinary action and re-education should be done in private. It's not a spectacle for the public to ogle at.
😂😂😂”hope you learned something today”
Officer Moschella felt that in his soul.
He had to make a visit to the doctor because his ego just suffered a severe injury.
Yep 🤣
The Sergeant is excellent. Integrity.
You forgot to give the police sergeant a mark. He deserves an A+ for his professional stand and correcting his dumb colleague.
So the cop is pissed that he was lied to. How likely do you think it was that the pig lied about "receiving a call about a suspicious person"?
I want to know who is actually making all these suspicious persons calls into police departments every single time someone tries to film outside a station? I'm willing to bet either nobody called, or another officer called it in just to mess with the cameraman...
@@swooopg you could pour through all of the 911 calls for the hours prior to even being there and, in this case, would likely not find anything.
Always remember, in a police interaction, only one of you are legally allowed to lie.
@@wh4070 exactly! I love how it's always "we got a call about a suspicious persons", no you didn't sir, you are just nosy...
I can guarantee there was no call. They need to manufacture some type of alert to justify them inserting themselves where they're neither wanted nor needed.
If you are arrested you have a right to request the review of their call log to see if such a call was made. Most of the times it's made up bullshit.
Demands ID from someone doing nothing illegal and then when asked for his ID refuses to give it. Wonderful
You would blame the officer for exercising his rights?
After doing something illegal...
@@lambdaman3228 when on duty he has to identify himself! Name and badge number.
@@miket1362 There is no law that says these officers must identify themselves on demand.
@@lambdaman3228 Actually yes there is, but hey nice try. Only time it is allowed is if the officer is a member of an undercover unit. A uniformed officer initiating contact with someone absolutely does have to identify themselves, in most states the first words out of the officers mouth is "Hello, I am officer blah blah blah with the blah police department. Reason for the stop is...".
Bully and a Tyrant! FIRE HIM!
You missed a great opportunity to highlight wonderful policing on the part of the sergeant. He definitely gets an A+! GREAT JOB SIR!
I love how the cop then refused to give his name and badge number when he more then likely is required to. But yet wants to harass an innocent citizen for Id when he had no obligation to. That cop should be fired, not only did he act like a tool the whole time, but then to refuse giving his name and badge number shows how childish and his disgust for the ppl he is supposed to be protecting and serving not violating innocent ppl just cause. He obvi forgot who pays him
Here Here!!!
The real issue with this type of interaction is that cops are pretty much universally taught to always try to ID everyone they encounter so that they can run them for warrants, reasonable suspicion be damned.
Well if people didn't always have warrants
@@garbageparade5144 bad analogy ID is worse then crack to cops
@@garbageparade5144 What a ridiculous thing to say. Only a tiny percentage of the population has warrants. But it wouldn't matter if that wasn't the case. The cops have no business sifting through the population, looking for things over which to bust people. It is outrageous. "Stop and frisk" and checkpoints are abominations to liberty. Trying to get everyone they encounter to identify themselves as happens in this video, and countless others, is right along that line.
You cannot convince me they are not under quotas.
@@slyjokerg Don't be so harsh on Garbage Parade. He's having so much fun, his mommy is letting him use her tablet today.
No crime, No ID needed, cop needs educating, why do these cops not know correct laws, they come across as clowns...
Unbelievable what an embarrassment
I bet that cop was fuming inside when the citizen said "Hope you learned something today.". 😂
This guy should be fired
I hope he did actually learn something. I'd rather that than him just fume. However... sounds like he has a history so maybe not.
Shout out to Sgt Ruiz for putting his people in check and protecting that man's rights.
After High School I went to school for 5 years to ultimately be able to do my job for the last 35+ years without getting any violations or any negative issues. For a cop who goes to a 6 month training course and then is given a Badge & GUN is insane. They need smarter officers who will not lie constantly to everyone everywhere.
Moschella behaved like this knowing he was being videoed; I can only imagine how he conducts himself when he is not being filmed. Empowering you with a badge and a gun is a very dangerous situation.
I don’t think Moschella is a evil cop like others we have seen. I just think he’s dumb asf, as most are.
Yeah 40 years ago talking to a cop like that would likely end up with auditor going for a ride and never heard from again.
I said that to an officer in a courthouse. He proceeded to call me to him. Grabbed me, shoved me against a wall and proceeded to tell me I needed to give my ID. So yeah fuck those tyrants.
Ding Ding Ding! One can only imagine that if this is how he acts on camera, it's likely that he is 10x's worse without cameras and witnesses.
@@weipan2937 any man who has no problem threatening to throw citizens in a cage because they won’t comply with his will is a perfect example of evil. Obviously he’s dumb. That’s self evident. The evil is revealed by his lies and deceptions with threats of being thrown in a cage just the cherry on top.
It's hilarious how the police always say "You're making this more difficult than it has to be" while they are making it more difficult than it has to be 😆
Exactly the same sentence uttered by every rapist!
The kings of double talk
So much gas lighting
I hope that officer was fired and arrested for harassment. This is inexcusable.
The look on the cops face is priceless "😮" ... 😂😂😂😂
The way the camera swung back to the 1st officer after the Sargent Said it was Ok ...is comedy gold :)
"are we clear?"
"is HE clear? Because Me and You are clear"
🤣🤣
$60 bucks an hour……..wow..
The “I always have I.D” relating to fingerprints is awesome
How can we continue to employ people who don’t understand the bounds of their job? As a trucking company owner, I could never employ someone who cannot drive a truck. Same should be with our public servants.
That’s a big 10-4
Hell swift does it everyday
The analogy would be to go back to the 70s, and have all your employees members of the Teamsters Union when they yielded a lot of power.
You're right - if an officer can't perform a routine stop (a common task), it is reasonable to wonder if he knows how to do anything.
@@jakeford9165 🤔😅😅😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣💜👍
The line between enforcing the law and behaving like a tyrant is very thin. That officer probably takes great pleasure in stepping over it
Sergeant Ruiz is MORE of what we need. Thank you Sergeant Ruiz for being a real police officer.
“Hope you learned something today” LMFAO
"In case something turns into something". That shows how many brain cells it takes to be a cop.
I was thinking the whole time, “just please own up to your mistake”. A simple: “I apologize sir, I was mistaken” goes a LONG way and people respect you for that. This is why Pride is a sin; it’s not that pride is inherently bad, people are just often prideful about the wrong things or egocentric.
A lot of times in today's climate, admitting to wrongdoing is the last thing you'd want to do, actually
Well put!
Actually seen a video. Cops showed up to dudes house, Amd after it was done the cop came back and apologized and got fired. For saying sorry
The amount of people not able to admit mistake, or feel shame when doing so, is staggering. Ego problem og maybe even toxic masculinity as it's a lot more prevelant with men (I can't believe I said that).
@@svendbentjensen5512 Being honest, even if the truth you have to admit is a bit uncomfortable, speaks to character & integrity. You have those qualities; the officer in the video does not.
If the cop already stated "you aren't in any trouble" then he clearly already concluded that the man was NOT engaged in "suspicious activity", and obviously wouldn't need his ID even if it was a stop & identify state. This boils down to the cop wanting to be obeyed, like usual. Whenever these types of cops start trying to argue with someone regarding rights, they either have no idea what a person's rights even are, or they just don't give a shit. A lot of times I think it's a mixture of both. They have an inkling of an idea what our rights are, but they don't give a shit to understand better, and they don't give a shit to respect the rights they are aware of. Our supposedly equal branches of government have gotten to where cops are somehow granted the most power & authority on a daily basis, with people's rights being violated in some shape or another on a literally daily basis. Of course this goes to their head. They also get away with lying in reports & in court all too often.
their attitude is upheld by politicians...it actually ties in with our current situation with cv19...they will have no problem beating us into submission over it.
It actually sucks because cops are entitled to lie to people they’re “investigating,” so him saying he’s “not in trouble” doesn’t actually end suspicion
In my opinion most cops know our rights and basic laws. The cops don't care and violate your rights easily because of their ego and they rarely get into trouble. Cops are used to people listening and obeying any order given.
Yeah but they can lie to you…he fully intended to try to make trouble for the guy.
@Ms. Kitty Katt in case you haven't noticed we're already under a fascist regime using the pandemic as reason and giving leo carte blanche to enforce it...and that's happening worldwide. Christians are not your enemy.
I have to congratulate the Sgt, very clear articulate and of his don of command to a subaltern. It shows a higher level of education.
That ate him up🤣🤣
That Sargent showed exemplary leadership. And showed what that officer should have done in the first place.