Thank you man continue educate these criminals tribalist who want to cause a terrific hovoc in our society.We must not hate one another for no objective reasons.I speak shona and i have no problem with Ndebeles and any other tribes of Zimbabwe.
If we hate each other based on the tribal lines then it is a politicians who benefit by using tribes at our expense. It is our choice to benefit from our differences or suffer from our differences
Who hate Ndebeles wena ? Us Shonas we don't have that D.N.A of hating people based on tribal line.We only see you Ndebeles always on tiktok castigating us Shonas for the crimes that we didn't commit.
Shona people could care less about ndebele people most of us never think of you.😂 you guys are always crying about us 😂😂 we never think of you fools saying vele all day
There is absolutely no notions of kudzimba or kudzimbira in the name Zimbabwe. You are correct about wrong pronunciation of Zimbabge. This is the only country where citizens cannot properly pronounce the name of their country.
Mzilikazi was not from South Africa. He was from KwaZulu. South Africa are just borders put by colonists under the authority of the Queen. When he came it was not Zimbabwe yet, and South Africa was not yet established. Only the San and Homo Erectus are native to Zimbabwe. Then Khoi Khoi Khoi came third. Then the Shonas came fourth. The Shonas are not native to Zimbabwe. They are from Burundi.
Ndebeles are not Zulus and were never Zulus. Mzilikazi after his father and his people were subdued by the Ndwandwes joined the Zulu under Tshaka. That did not make him zulu. Dzimbabwe is not even what you edimburated. I can live my email here if you want us to educate each other about this. You are far from the center of the dartboard
Ndebeles are ONLY found in Mpumalanga emzansi. And Mzilikazi was a Ntungwa and ultimately a Zulu.Mzingwane Ntumbane Bulawayo are all in the modern day Matebeleland but their replicas in KwaZulu. The name KwaMhlanga is not in the mordern day Matebele but this is the true home of the Ndebele eMzansi. The brother seems to know what he is talking about.
@@user-cityjozi I respect your opinion, but i have a question for you. At the moment, I'm staying with the Xhosa people in South Africa. It had been alomost 2 decades now, does that make me Xhosa. Mzilikazi apparently stayed under the Zulus for 9 years and is already a zulu. There were a lot of tribes that were in cooperated under the Zulu people during the reign of Tshaka, they are still recognised today and most of them defected again to establish their own autonomous states.
@@oswellmakuvazachitsa7340 You ask a difficult question that depends on whether there is food or a fight. Remember when I am under attack you are my brother and whatever language we speak easily unites us. But after the fight is won I will start asking questions about where you come etc just to stop you from sharing our victory and benefits. You correct on the make-up of the Zulu nation now and if you check the nine 9 years spent by Mzilikazi with Shaka he was under Shaka rule and this places his clan under the Zulu nation like many other Zulu clans. Yes he was a Zulu. And yes you are now Xosa other things being equal.
@@mukodoborijakafiriri8698 no my brother, I always respect your submissions, but on this one your line of argument is totally misleading. I can not be Xhosa and will never be. Mzilikazi joined Tshaka as a way of finding refuge with his people while regrouping for an inevitable renegade. That's is why he fought with Tshaka on 3 occasions. He had to send that message clear and when he left had Khumaloship on his shoulders. What he carried fro KwaZulu were military and perhaps administration skills not any ethnicity. The bloodline must speak of one origin. I remain a karanga of the gumbo totem. An academic submission can be an acceptable judgment, but does that really reflect particularity?
Facts
Thank you man continue educate these criminals tribalist who want to cause a terrific hovoc in our society.We must not hate one another for no objective reasons.I speak shona and i have no problem with Ndebeles and any other tribes of Zimbabwe.
This guy is saying the truth
Maita brother. Lots of work to do to correct the wrongs we have done to ourselves. Commonwealth and Rome are falling, let them fall with them.
True
Dzimbamabgwe . Chikaranga vakaranga makaranga
That is the correct spelling of Bgwe. You are correct
@@abednigondlovu4096How so?
There are no houses of stone at Great Zimbabwe but there are walls of stone
Very true but it's too late to correct
If we hate each other based on the tribal lines then it is a politicians who benefit by using tribes at our expense. It is our choice to benefit from our differences or suffer from our differences
Free education this Guy is sport on
Spread this video people must know the truth, mugabe caused confusion because he was not a Zimbabwean
What is Zimbabgwe?
Shona means disappear
shalom brother !, Listening this from ZA Cape town
Thanks brother. Does it make sense?
Remember mugabe was not a Zimbabwean and he caused serious problems for us
It's true. Shona is a language not a tribe. Shona is made up of many languages.
If mzilikazi was shaka brother then a leopard does not change its spots .the British changed everything ngunis are southern Africans people period
You are not at all shona people were here before all of you
Why do shona people hate ndebele people. If i were Shona, I'd be ashamed of my identity
If you hate yourself enough then you have surplus hate to hate others it is sad.
Who hate Ndebeles wena ? Us Shonas we don't have that D.N.A of hating people based on tribal line.We only see you Ndebeles always on tiktok castigating us Shonas for the crimes that we didn't commit.
Shona people could care less about ndebele people most of us never think of you.😂 you guys are always crying about us 😂😂 we never think of you fools saying vele all day
There is absolutely no notions of kudzimba or kudzimbira in the name Zimbabwe.
You are correct about wrong pronunciation of Zimbabge. This is the only country where citizens cannot properly pronounce the name of their country.
speak of yourself
Ndebeles of Zimbabwe today are not Zimbabweans but they are South Africans.Zimbabwe belongs to Shona godfather King Munhumutapa period.
And that can't take us anyway bcz we all zimbabweans
True Bulawayo is from South Africa KZN where ZULU nation is. Mzilikazi is ZULU he was running away from Shaka he's not a Zimbabweans
The Shona are from Burundi and Tanganyika
@@ndix2053 but traitors/cowards/thieves found them there
Mzilikazi was not from South Africa. He was from KwaZulu. South Africa are just borders put by colonists under the authority of the Queen. When he came it was not Zimbabwe yet, and South Africa was not yet established. Only the San and Homo Erectus are native to Zimbabwe. Then Khoi Khoi Khoi came third. Then the Shonas came fourth. The Shonas are not native to Zimbabwe. They are from Burundi.
@@ndix2053we have been in this county for 1000 yrs ndebeles and white people same WhatsApp group a bunch of colonizerd
@@2010DDB we are native cry more you ndebeles must go back home you love to fight you to violent for us peaceful shona people
Why did the Ndebele people get killed in a genocide. That's where our problem is
they started it dont forget that
Cause you thought you were tough now you know your place
Use of the term 'tribe'" is not appropriate. It's best to avoid this term.
Ndebeles are not Zulus and were never Zulus. Mzilikazi after his father and his people were subdued by the Ndwandwes joined the Zulu under Tshaka. That did not make him zulu. Dzimbabwe is not even what you edimburated. I can live my email here if you want us to educate each other about this. You are far from the center of the dartboard
Ndebeles are ONLY found in Mpumalanga emzansi. And Mzilikazi was a Ntungwa and ultimately a Zulu.Mzingwane Ntumbane Bulawayo are all in the modern day Matebeleland but their replicas in KwaZulu. The name KwaMhlanga is not in the mordern day Matebele but this is the true home of the Ndebele eMzansi. The brother seems to know what he is talking about.
@@user-cityjozi I respect your opinion, but i have a question for you. At the moment, I'm staying with the Xhosa people in South Africa. It had been alomost 2 decades now, does that make me Xhosa. Mzilikazi apparently stayed under the Zulus for 9 years and is already a zulu. There were a lot of tribes that were in cooperated under the Zulu people during the reign of Tshaka, they are still recognised today and most of them defected again to establish their own autonomous states.
@@oswellmakuvazachitsa7340 You ask a difficult question that depends on whether there is food or a fight. Remember when I am under attack you are my brother and whatever language we speak easily unites us. But after the fight is won I will start asking questions about where you come etc just to stop you from sharing our victory and benefits.
You correct on the make-up of the Zulu nation now and if you check the nine 9 years spent by Mzilikazi with Shaka he was under Shaka rule and this places his clan under the Zulu nation like many other Zulu clans. Yes he was a Zulu.
And yes you are now Xosa other things being equal.
@@mukodoborijakafiriri8698 no my brother, I always respect your submissions, but on this one your line of argument is totally misleading. I can not be Xhosa and will never be. Mzilikazi joined Tshaka as a way of finding refuge with his people while regrouping for an inevitable renegade. That's is why he fought with Tshaka on 3 occasions. He had to send that message clear and when he left had Khumaloship on his shoulders. What he carried fro KwaZulu were military and perhaps administration skills not any ethnicity. The bloodline must speak of one origin. I remain a karanga of the gumbo totem. An academic submission can be an acceptable judgment, but does that really reflect particularity?