Tiktaalik's First Steps - David Attenborough's Rise of the Animals: Triumph of the Vertebrates - BBC
VloĆŸit
- Äas pĆidĂĄn 15. 09. 2013
- Subscribe and đ to the BBC đ bit.ly/BBCCZcamsSub
Watch the BBC first on iPlayer đ bbc.in/iPlayer-Home More about this programme: www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b03bgs18 A CGI recreation of an ancient limbed fish, Tiktaalik, emerges from the water to take its first steps on land.
#bbc
All our TV channels and S4C are available to watch live through BBC iPlayer, although some programmes may not be available to stream online due to rights. If you would like to read more on what types of programmes are available to watch live, check the 'Are all programmes that are broadcast available on BBC iPlayer?' FAQ đ bbc.in/2m8ks6v. - ZĂĄbava
My ass would have stayed in the primordial soup if I knew there was gonna be days like this
Seriously!
Life's first bruh moment
Nah, it was homo habilis.
r/Im14andThisIsDeep
The biggest mistake ever made.
EVOLUTION MEME 100
His ass would've stayed in the primordial soup if he ever knows there's gonna be days like this.
For you maybe
It seems that you would rather have gills and stay underwater
True
turn around dude, you don't know what you're getting into!
@Ronit ganguly czcams.com/video/B9h1tR42QYA/video.html
@@gabrielaviles2945 Thank you for this
It's cool, we'll all be back in the water again soon. Global warming or something.
this is the essence of our inner fish
Dad: why are you crying so loud?
Me:
Tiktaalik dad! Tiktaalik
Tikaaliks heavy duty fin still helped it to swim-
I got to hold the skull of a Tiktaalik today, great experience and fascinating animal!
You held the skull of your great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great grandfather
You're lucky you got to hold the skull of our great prehistoric ancestor
Where the heck were you, to hold that?
Land: âcome overâ
Tiktaalik: âI canât Iâm defending my niche and fighting for food.â
Land: âvertebrates havenât evolved and exploited my resources hereâ
Tiktaalik: *FEET*
*FEET*
đ
my ancestor : )
*our ancestor
Stupid .. you not me
My ancestor was prophet adam a.s.
@@andyhrp903 dude stfu
@@andyhrp903 bruh moment
@@andyhrp903 idiot
wow so thanks to this guy i have to work for 50 years to retire and only rest 10 years
nice
You don't need to work 50 years
@@radicalthunder5740 Yeah, most of us do, genius.
@@zebras298 get a high paying job and work less idiot
Better than struggling for food to survive for every hour of every day and not getting to be 1 before a predator eats you.
I really love how they show accurate plants on the river bed, but then it pans out to spruce trees in the distance⊠those evolved at least 200 million years after this.
Even trees by themselves hadnât evolved yet until the beginning of the Carfoniberous which was 20 million years after Tiktaalik evolved
It look like Archaeopteris, which lived in late Devonian
â@@Blablabla-ol2tr No
@@sovereignone1900 "No"
Wow, that's the most powerful and awesome argument I've ever seen!
â@@Blablabla-ol2trOk
â@@Blablabla-ol2trthat lived during the carboniferous
This is honestly breathtaking
I understand that people are joking in the comments and maybe also not joking about how hard it is to be human. Yes it is. But every living organism has had hard days. We evolve to make it easier. So in this life you can evolve to at least make it mostly easier.
It is called acceptance. Work with what you have and appreciate what youâve got. Itâs okay to be hurt or feel angry. But notice how holding on to that will stunt your growth as a person. Humans should always allow themselves the freedom to find little bits of peace in this life. If you can do that, and focus less on the negative, you will continue to move forward and evolve.
Well said, my good manđ
GET BACK GET BACK INTO THE WATER YOU DONâT KNOW WHAT YOUâRE DOING
im boutta head out
Lmao
Lol
GO BACK GO BACK
GO GRANDPA GO!!!
Tiktaalik is my father
But that isn't surprising
Tiktaalik is everyone's father
Tiktaalik is your father.
you mean grandpa
Yes daddy Tiktaalik
Last common ancestor between all land vertebrae. Salamander, crocodile, hawk, gorilla, human, you name it.
He went on land to buy this thing called milk and never returned since then
â@@snakeeyes9246Acshually, Tiktaalik appears to be a "close" cousin to whatever population of fish may have been the first tetrapods, rather than a direct ancestor, which is impossible to tell when you have a small pool of fossil specimen to work with (but that is ok - there's also quite the chance that non of the members of that common ancestor became fossilized). The last common ancestor of all living tetrapods also lived millions of years after Tiktaalik, with Tiktaalik being at best what is referred to as a _stem-tetrapod_ (as it's not part of the crown group).
Tiktaalik be like : *leg*
You never know how natural selection works.Evolution is not like that.
*leg*
Tiktaalik is the fish with four small fins used as legs to walking.Tiktaalik are the four small legged fish to be changed and evolved into the tetropods of reptiles and mammals.This is the great evolution of animals itself.
It was a mistake
this one adaptation lead to so many animals becoming extinct. one of the worst moments in earth history. these stupid creatures should of just stayed in the water.
â@@johnmarkson1998o zaman sende suda olurdun
@@johnmarkson1998 or not. They probably survived the late Devonian mass extinctions by moving onto land.
This animal is very funny, I would like him to stay alive. I love it.
czcams.com/video/B9h1tR42QYA/video.html
Its predecessor, lung fish, is still alive
This animal is us man
this "funny animal" is still alive your as it rn
This is one of our ancient grandparents. We were once this very fish.
0:49 Markpliers "NO NO WHAT ARE YOU DOING!" fits this moment like a glove.
Donât use Markiplier to bolster your nihilistic comment, he would be proud of how far we come as a species.
We miss you grandpa
I donât want to be a human,I just want to return to Tiktaalik
It's always good to have sir Dave on TV, can't wait to watch the show.
My ancestor :)
czcams.com/video/B9h1tR42QYA/video.html
bruh that's my uncle Quarg
czcams.com/video/B9h1tR42QYA/video.html
Atheists be like: GO GRANDMA!!
It's funny cuz it's trueeee
Many theists also accept evolution.
Hell yeah we do
Christians be like : GRANDMA EVE DONT EAT THE APPLE.
@@laranjaghirga5058 lmao, Iâm actually an atheist now
A small step for me but a big step for humanity.
Tiktaalik the Landwalker 350.000.000 BC
Do you believe in evolution
â@@pauldirc..What do you mean "believe". Its a demonstrable fact
â@@abel3557 its a theory
@@kittycatwithinternetaccess2356 It's a scientific theory buffoon.
EY I'M WALKING 'ERE
czcams.com/video/B9h1tR42QYA/video.html
Thats why I have to do my assignments
No one:
Tiktalik: That's some nice land you have over there, it would be a shame if a fish starts waking over it...
"We did it! We're the first animals on land!"
"Uh, dude, the bugs got here first."
"Yeah, but my descendants will write the book!"
Said book: "The bugs got there first."
The creature that gave rise to everything.
@katrina yarbo because of evolution. Keep in mind, tiktaalik may be only the first example of this middle phase. Just like we discover the tyrannosaurus rex, we also found many other similar species, with varying features due to different methods of survival among other things. Gradually, over hundreds of millions of years, you're bound to have such diversity. Earth changes, all life on it can only change with it, or die.
+Jackie Wilson What happenned to Ape pride? Had to start somwhere indeed...
PS: now Thee Fact is back to Land or puddle.
Earth has only been around for 10,000 years. Dragonflies lived with the desmatosuchus which lived with the stylinodon which lived with the przewalski's horse which lived with the carcharodontosaurus which lived with the aspidorhynchus which lived with the Jackson's chameleon which lived with the archaeopteryx which lived with the pachychalosaurus.
@@alvrooman2969 are you high
@@alvrooman2969 Absolutely none of that is true. You should get your history lessons from actual historians and paleontologists instead of bronze-age mythology.
Pov: you have done building a fully functional time machine after fixing, testing, and building. You decided to go to the Devonian Era. What are you going to do?
Shot the fish. Oh wait grandfather paradox
@@greyideasthetheliopurodon4640Then youâll kill us all and yourself, didnât think of that, now did ya?
@secondary1verril22 As for my response, Iâd help life flourish, and ensure our species continues!
"Do it for the vine!"
2012 mfers:
Yes only a theory. You do realise that a scientific theory is an explanation supported by facts - not a guess. Can you tell me why creationists lie about this?
Read "The fish within you" by Neal Shubin, one of the people who discovered tiktaalik. His video is mentioned just inches to the right of this comment. I haven't read it yet, but I have his book right here beside my bed. Get it and read it. It is an extremely important and fascinating work. One of the things about this fish was that it had a working wrist joint for walking. Shubin clears up the entire question of evolution, in case that still bothers anyone.
I love this stuff!
Ray Provence You are form old CZcams
@@declan9876 Indeed, hopefully heâs still heređ
@@declan9876Indeed, hopefully heâs still here!đ
beautiful short clip and it's so calming to see the view of the world (rendered) when everything on it was just pure nature. no buildings, no brick structures and no humans
The atmosphere was cooler that time.
I agree. I believe humans should go back to living off of nature.
i love this.
There's nothing good in that realm. Go back at once!
Nope, land means life, such is the course of Mother Nature.
Nowadays Coelacanth and lungfish are the closest living relative of the tetrapods ( such as human and all other 4 limb vertebrate )
awe my ancestors were kind of cute
Luca in a nutshell
My ancestors :)
It's cute.
Indeed. :)
Yeah, and excuse my language, but as much as I love all prehistoric animals, a majority of them were fucked up. The ones from the Paleozoic era are no exception. But Tiktaalik is surprisingly cute. :)
@@dfox6222 C:
Everyone: if i go back in time I'd kill Hitler
Me: KILL FISH
Kill those aliens who brought life here...( because abiogenesis is a mystery...as of now)
1:01
This scene is so emotional.......
Bosques sin pĂĄjaros al fondo ....el tiktaalik tenia la respuesta al sentido de la vida, asi desde que evoluciono a colibries y elefantes , monos , murcielagos, cocodrilos, ballenas, felinos, humanos, etc,etc
@@rodocar2736
sĂ, era el animal perfecto. DesearĂa que todavĂa existiera hoy porque serĂa una gran mascota. lo siento, traduje esto con el traductor de Google. No hablo español, solo hablo inglĂ©s.
@@jasonchow6475 No se si era perfecto. Creo que tiktaalik no tendrĂa empatĂa, su psicologĂa seria igual a la de los sapos o cocodrilos
@@rodocar2736
Creo que era un animal menos agresivo en comparaciĂłn con los cocodrilos o ciertas lagartijas.
@@jasonchow6475 Era un depredador, en el fondo todos los vertebrados deberĂan tener ese instinto, incluso las ovejas
this is magnificent
Virgin return to monke vs chad return to fishe
super Gigachads return to lucca
I love how they don't potray it as walking perfectly, like I have seen. Legs have only just begun, and walking is mainly just awkward shuffling at this point. Yet despite that, none of us would be around today if it hadn't awkwardly shuffled out of the primordial soup
Great to see a distant relative succeeding.
What if tiktaalik behavedlike a cross between the lungfish and mudskippers we're familiar with today? Maybe they lived in areas where there were cyclical droughts and floods (usually mild but sometimes severe), and they adapted to survive and thrive in both habitat extremes . Perhaps, like mudskippers, they could go from isolated pool to isolated pool by crawling across sandbars between them, but should they have ever experienced extended dry spells, they could have employed the estivation technique lungfish use by burying themselves in sediment and entering a suspended animation dormancy state to wait-out the drought 'til the next rains came.
"What if....maybe....perhaps..." are evo buzz words like "likely...probably...may have...we can infer....could have..." and are used to replace the actual data, which is ignored, spun or denied. And btw walking catfish and mud skippers are nothing but 100% fish who use their 100% frontal, fish, fins in unusual ways, much like a flying fish that is no way turning into a bird.
Take a quick peek at Tiktaalik's fossil and have your eyes opened to the actual facts. www.google.com/search?q=tiktaalik+fossil&tbm=isch&source=iu&ictx=1&fir=3h3LRBfeemp57M%253A%252CJfQpmsce0MgauM%252C_&usg=__r48ClG1TAIW07mlLWT9C6BOw5Yw%3D&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj96M2C5rTaAhVO2FMKHR3mA9oQ9QEIYjAK&biw=1366&bih=637#imgrc=3h3LRBfeemp57 Notice it does not even have any fossilized material for the hind end "legs", or even a fin, there. The highly fragmented frontal fins are mostly missing and going in a horizontal direction. not a vertical direction as would be needed for legs. (Frankly, the thought that some claim to see legs forming on that fossil always makes me laugh. It's knee slapping hilarious.)
.
Lobe finned fish don't have legs. No fish have legs. Having a bigger pelvis and shoulder girdle, as they claim shows it evolved into you, just shows it had a bigger pelvis and shoulder girdle, i.e. minor variations such as we see constantly in nature. It doesn't show legs.
.
Though evolutionists want to tell us Tik evolved into an amphibian with the cutsey nickname of "fishapod", ichthyologists call it a lobe finned FISH. Evolutiolnism presents theories that have no data and ignore the real data. Dont let evo-think rob you of your common sense and common knowledge about fish. Maybe read The Emperor's New Clothes.
.
The person who discovered Tik was Neil Shubin. (He claims to have predicted its discovery but I have seen no literature supporting that claim before the find. When I ask others, who believe the claim, to provide documentation, they never respond.) In his book Your Inner Fish he says himself that there is no way to be sure Tik was a transition of any kind. But he says that, if not, "something like it" was.
.
The evidence he presents for something like it? Zero. So, that's the big data showing you supposedly are a fish update? One incredibly fragmented, very incomplete, fossil which even its biggest supporter admits may not be a transition - while we are supposed to ignore the countless billions of fossils, and living exmples, that always show fish stay fish?
.
We have data. It shows fish in the real world and in the fossils. Fish never have had legs or even parts of legs. They stay fish.
.
Reviewing the link above, I want to say something about the artistic replicas of Tik that are pictured along with the fossil. Though the actual fossil has only small, close to the body, highly fragmented frontal fins, the artistic replicas show it with long, strong, muscular legs as it makes its amazing "ascent" to land. Fictional artwork, including computer simulatioms which do not match the observable evidence, are consistently used to defend evoutionism.
,
Notice that one artist portrays something that looks like ground gripping, rounded, pads at the ends of the presumed legs. See any evidence for any of that in the fossil? Some replicas, including a grey one, show a tail! Even hind legs! See any such things on the fossil, which doesn't even have a back end? There are other art works that show snake-like tails. See any evidence for that on the fossil?
.
Now, one artist's fictional, small and flat, tail could presumably slide onto land. Also those artists who providced Tik with a snake- like tail present a scenario that makes a climb to land seem somewhat feasible. What about the tails lobe finned fish really have, however? Well, they have broad vertical tails - not exactly the kinds that would be most useful for climbs to land.
.
Let's look at what some secular scientists have had to say that disagrees with evolutionism.
.
We are told that beneficial mutations are an essential mechanism for evolution to occur, but H. J. Mueller, who won a Nobel Prize for his work on mutations, said....
"It is entirely in line with the accidental nature of mutations that extensive tests have agreed in showing the vast majority of them detrimental to the organism in its job of surviving and reproducing -- good ones are so rare we can consider them all bad." H.J. Mueller, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 11:331.
.
Now I hasten to add that in his next sentence Mueller went on to say "Nevertheless we can infer..." to support evolutionism anyway. That's how it goes in the politically correct, fiercely self protective, orthodox world of Neo Darwinisn. If the hard fought for research data doesn't agree with the sacred cow theory, no problem - just "infer" something that has goes in the exact opposite direction of what the data showed.
.
Anyway, mutations are isolated, random, events that do not build on one another like Legos, and certainly have no ability to create totally new DNA as, for ex., would be needed to turn a leg into a wing.
.
As for natural selection, it does not lead to evolution, either. What does NS select from? What is already in the genome. It shuffles pre existing information or may cause a loss of information, not the new info you would need to turn a fin into, say, a foot. That is why no matter what it selects from in a fish or bird or lizard or bacteria or monkey or tree or flower you will still have a fish, bird, lizard, bacteria, etc.
.
But, if you can, give data - not just theories presented as facts in the conveniently invisible past - that a Life Form A turned into Life Form B as the result of NS. In other words show that a species went to the next level in the Animal Kingdom (ditto for plants) a new genus. There are trillions of life forms on this planet. We're told it happened in the unverifiable past. Why don't we see any species transitioning to a new genus today?
.
Let's see what some other secular scientists have to say about evolution.
.
Bowler, Peter J., Review of In Search of Deep Time by Henry Gee (Free Press, 1999), American Scientist (vol. 88, March/April 2000), p. 169.
"We cannot identify ancestors or 'missing links,' and we cannot devise testable theories to explain how particular episodes of evolution came about. Gee is adamant that all the popular stories about how the first amphibians conquered the dry land, how the birds developed wings and feathers for flying, how the dinosaurs went extinct, and how humans evolved from apes are just products of our imagination, driven by prejudices and preconceptions."
.
"There are only two possibilities as to how life arose. One is spontaneous generation arising to evolution; the other is a supernatural creative act of God. There is no third possibility. Spontaneous generation, that life arose from non-living matter was scientifically disproved 120 years ago by Louis Pasteur and others. That leaves us with the only possible conclusion that life arose as a supernatural creative act of God. I will not accept that philosophically because I do not want to believe in God. Therefore, I choose to believe in that which I know is scientifically impossible; spontaneous generation arising to evolution." (Nobel Prize winner Wald, George, "Innovation and Biology," Scientific American, Vol. 199, Sept. 1958, p. 100)
.
"The pathetic thing about it is that many scientists are trying to prove the doctrine of evolution, which no science can do." (Dr. Robert A. Milikan, physicist and Nobel Prize winner, speech before the American Chemical Society.)
.
"Hypothesis [evolution] based on no evidence and irreconcilable with the facts....These classical evolutionary theories are a gross over-simplification of an immensely complex and intricate mass of facts, and it amazes me that they are swallowed so uncritically and readily, and for such a long time, by so many scientists without a murmur of protest."
(Sir Ernst Chan, Nobel Prize winner for developing penicillin)
.
On this webpage you can see Nobel Prize winning scientists, other secular scientists - including some world famous evolutionists - admitting there is no evidence for evolution. You can see them calling evolution a kind of religion, something that leads to "anti knowledge", etc. Notice how many of these secular scientists acknowledge evidence for a Creator.
freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1435562/posts
.
Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed shows the politics of Neo Darwinism which harasses and expels those in academia and the media who even hint that there MIGHT be evidence for a Creator.
czcams.com/video/4HErmp5Pzqw/video.html
.
Anyone reading this: You are not an ape update. You were created in the very image and likeness of the Creator. He is your Father and loves you and wants you to know Him, and love Him too. Why trade in that fantastic truth for a bunch of mumbo jumbo pseudo science that even secular scientists can't get consensus on? Rhetorical Q.
Lorica Lass: TLDR
FFND (fast food nation dear) I'm sorry if my post, which would have taken 5 minutes to read, was too challenging for you. Would it have taken 5 minutes away from your telly time? Why did you even bother to comment? If you don't want to look at data that is basically in a rather short presentation, don't look.
Shruggz Da Str8-Faced Clown, an amphibian couldn't survive a drought, it left the sea because of the deeper seas and prey on land because there were edible arthropods on land.
From this, the butterfly effect comes into play and creates CZcams
MY SPIRIT ANIMAL
We were succeeded by Tiktaaliks, to change the Earth and we all did it, not of us among the species haven't come this far.
And we have mudskippers, and one day, it will follow our ancestor Tiktaalik's steps and change the world with new species in over million years later.
czcams.com/video/B9h1tR42QYA/video.html
Evolutions first mistake
Truly a magnificent scene.
Amenđ€©
Does anyone know how to view the entire documentary. Iâve gone to the BBC website and still canât figure out how to play it on my phone or laptop
beautiful and very cool video
He's still going!
That animations is smooth af
wow this is literally me
Had to start somewhere.
this is so cool!
Amazing, sorprendente.
amazing
The 30 seconds most important of the life history, are so beutifulâ€
2) In books there are photos that clearly show layers of strata that are on-an-angle and the layers are clearly poking out of the surface (on an angle). The strata were originally level but earth movement (tectonic or earthquake) made it angled. In some cases the protruding strata erodes and new layers form (sometimes with more fossils). This makes some fossils appear out-of-sequence. Creation sites point that out but donât give a reason (like described above) cos of their belief.
Bro I want more videos like this
My ass wouldve stayed in the primordial soup
Same
Except no, because nature forced us to come to land. Sorryđ€Ș
Bro that's my great grandpa
The very first "Meh, what's the worst thing that could happen?" moment.
OMG I can't believe! It's literally me!
shouldve stayed in water now we have to "pay taxes"
what's the name of the full documentary
4) When the strata is on-an-angle, some of the layers poke out from the ground (jagged). The exposed angled strata erodes and the ground is once again flat (but the layers are still angled, underneath). Then more (level) layers form there and build up, trapping more fossils as it does. So fossils from the angled layers (that were once lower before the layers become angle by tectonics) are near the more advanced fossils (appearing out-of-sequence). But a study of the strata shows otherwise.
0:42 dont let me leave murph (i named the protosharks murph) DONT LET ME LEAVE MURPH *sobbing* NOHO NO NO NHHOOOOO
That was nice.
The rise of land has come
The leader of whole tetropods
A tiktaalik first step
A step of evolution
Everybody should be proudâ€
I remember there being a music video, I forget the song but it showed this fish walk on land and slowly evolve into a human, anyone know of that song?
Beautiful animal
Ok so I can go on land, but I have to go back into water to have BABIES!
Learn to use an egg
@@elevate07 I was already doing that.
@@Valtsuuu Use a stronger egg, put water in it, have a baby, on land, in the egg. Water is in the egg, baby in the egg, in the water in the egg.
The creatures that survived remain in the fossil column from where they start to all the way up. e.g. the horseshoe crab. It starts from near the bottom and goes right to the top. And, alas, it is surviving now. The fossil column fits with what we observe! Trilobites, however, stop in the record soon after it starts (and there are no trilobites alive now). Also fits with what we observe. HOW CAN THE FLOOD MAKE IT LIKE THAT? Please answer or you will be blocked.
The discovery of Tiktaalik is a classic case of scientific inquiry at work. The paleontologists who worked to locate the missing link between fish and the earliest land animals predicted that the rocks that would contain the transitional forms should be between 380mya - 360mya, and in fossilized river beads or swamps. The paleontologists found Tiktaalik at exactly that kind of rocks of that age.
2) This also proves that the creatures were not all created within a few days.
Some creationists use "flotation" in the flood to explain it but (as I said) surviving creature fossils are found above from where they start (but never below). How can "flotation" do that?
Also some creationists say "speed of escape" from the bottom and the fast ones got buried last. But humans are much later in the fossil column than birds and dragonflies (that are faster than us) and they start way below humans.
WOW! :O
Why did he do it?
*F O O D*
GO GRANDPA!!
Came here after Nightwish video!
Katrina, please continue.
what was that creature? never seen it before
This video was uploaded when i was born ;-;
1) When they find a fossil of a certain creature it will not appear under the first layers that it starts. And if it survive and is still living today (and is common) you probably will see fossils of it all the way up the strata, from where it started (but never below the start). But some creatures that survive now are extremely rare (from millions yrs ago) and we don't find any recent fossils (but they would be there) we just haven't found them (and found the living fossil first).
the creator of the indomitable human spirit
Before Erasmus beautiful thanks to him we are in the world â€
Yeah, only a theory, as well as the gravitational theory, the heliocentric theory, and the germ theory of disease... Look the definition of scientific theory and you will find that it doesn't mean the same thing as hypothesis.
>gravitational theory, the heliocentric theory, and the germ theory of disease
all false
@@SuperBlooper057 Give your evidences on your claim. I don't accept drunken claim without material evidences.
"To see the Tiktaalik take her first walk..."
I LOVE YOU GRANDPA
This is what I was taught about the coelacanth in grade school. Years later it became obvious no one knows what the hell they're talking about.
Titaalik : umm this is look nice
The tree :no you can't be up hear
What was his problem?