Is this the greatest bluff of ALL TIME? Phil Ivey is a poker GOD!
Vložit
- čas přidán 30. 09. 2020
- Phil Ivey has just 1 hand to represent and manages to get a fold. Absolutely amazing play!
The Poker Vaults Are Open! Welcome to the only official channel of the original full tilt poker Million Dollar Cash Game and much more. Here you'll find full poker episodes of many classic high stakes poker and poker tournament shows, with the big names like Phil Hellmuth, Phil Ivey, Daniel Negreanu, Tony G, Mike Matusow, Tom durrrr Dwan, Patrick Antonius, Chris Ferguson, Gus Hansen, Howard Lederer, plus poker highlights and poker compilations.
Subscribe now for more full shows: bit.ly/2YMrZ8C
Our epic poker playlist: • The Poker Vaults - Zábava
Probably 2nd best bluff, behind Sean Lock when he played carrot in a box.
"no I'll keep my box"
@@helderboymh You mean the one with a carrot in it?
I wish I could like this comment 1,000 times.
A man of culture I see
You are correct sir
Props to Ivey for “lying” about the ace. He didnt want him to feel like shit.
He saw the video, and he deserves to feel like shit anyways haha.
They just didn't want him to throw one of his typical tantrums and take his money off the table. He's the weakest player there by a mile, they all want that money.
He didnt lie techincally , he said he had "the ace" not the ace of clubs lol
He told him that he had "the ace," so Mike told him what he had.
Don' think Ivey cared if Matusow felt like shit or not - was probably convincing the table that he wasn't bluffing without showing
@@SPJN1998 Who knows what Ivey was thinking , thats what makes him such a menace on the felt.
When Matusow had to check his cards for the club and then was hesitant on the bet that's when Phil knew he had the flush but not the A. Matusow's tight rep enabled the bluff.
You make that kind of bluff when you can afford to be wrong. Ivey could, Matasow couldn't.
I never memorize my hand as "pocket Kings." It's always, "King of clubs, King of diamonds." You can't afford to give away information later in the hand when you have to check your cards.
good point, if i'm playing in this game it means i have at least 2 buy ins and can afford to lose so i have to call., i actually lose alot of these pots but i usually come out ahead at the end of the night. and people are very leary about bluffing me , but the other thing is if mikes not going to call then why even bet the river? just check and win a nice pot. @@academicdeaneducation6671
Didn’t he check his cards after Phil had already raised him
Didn’t he check his cards after Phil had already raised him
Nothing more satisfying than when you make a bluff and the guy is sitting there tearing his hair out and you know he's going to fold 😂😄
And then at the last second says "f*CK it, I call" 😑😑😑
At the end of the hand when Phil said "I had the Ace", he didn't lie, but as sly as a fox he misrepresented it as the Ace of clubs in Mike's head and also ALL the other players on the table. That to me was the most genius part of this video.
He did lie. He siad "I have two aces with the Ace of Clubs"
@@apcocozza its a white lie. He lied to be nice. If he showed the bluff it would have been brutal and crushed and embarrassed Mike
He Also Said He Had 2 Aces Including A of Clubs...And When He Said He Had The Ace He Obviously Meant The Ace of Clubs
but Benyaine said he knew it was a bluff.. basically saying he would have snap called
he lied to ease mike, so theyd have healthy play for the rest of the night, mike can always go back and watch for the truth post game.
For any Ivey fans, if you actually wanna see the sickest bluff: Million Dollar Cash Game S5E6, Ivey vs. Antonius vs. Benyamine, about 31 minutes in. Pure Ivey.
there, saved y'all 5 seconds czcams.com/video/wt0JwvPaQP8/video.htmlsi=BsbHH6r-gcQR9PqN&t=1860
My favorite Ivey move was "Phil Ivey vs Paul Jackson Poker Monte Carlo Millions"
@@tigerandbuddy Oh reraise by Paul Jackson
czcams.com/video/wt0JwvPaQP8/video.html
His very best bluff was in the heads up online tournament against Chidwick. Only real poker fans know and acknowledge this hand.
czcams.com/video/uU5x3eb0qbY/video.htmlsi=OP_DwvQCw__m0F8Z
Phil knows Mike is playing scare money!!
you mean borrowed money
Yup! He was more scared losing money than winning
More like the donkiest fold ever. I bet this hand haunts mike, horrible fold.
It was a perfect size re raise, i would put him on a better hand
How is this the donkiest fold ever? What does K high flush possibly beat here w A high flush and any boat out there on that kind of board? Plus they’re playing for stakes that high, I’m really sure that’s any easy snap call when the only thing you beat is basically a completely random, ballsy bluff.
It definitely wasn’t the greatest bluff of all time, but it wasn’t a donkey fold either
@@eugenekim6061 The only boat Ivey is representing is 77 cause 44 66 is going to raise the flop or t least bet the turn. Same with Jx, Jx calls flop but bet the turn cause there are three clubs there. Ivey called the flop and checked the turn.
He is getting 3 to 1 for a call which it means he has to win 30% of the time and he pf course has this %. I think it is an eaay call againat phil ivey
@@Furthermore23 good analysis mate
@@Furthermore23 First, as far as full houses:
Ivey, *without question,* has 77 & J7s in his range.
He also occasionally has J6s, J4s; and although it probably wouldn’t be as common-the occasional 44 and 66.
I think he’d be more likely to slowplay J6 than 44.
So, Mike’s King High Flush loses to those hands.
Next, Ivey definitely has at least 6 combinations of AcXc hands that would’ve flatted pre-flop.
(A2, A3, A5, A8, A9, A10).
All of those hands would flat pre, and although those hands would raise the flop a decent percentage, they’re going to be flatting the flop a decent percentage, as well.
So, all of those hands _also_ beat Mike.
Next, Ivey can have all the different combos of A4 A6 that have the bare Ace of clubs.
And he’ll occasionally have the Ace of Clubs with a Jd or Js, that he chose to just flat on the flop.
Next, there are two other hands Ivey could have that beat Mike: 3c5c & 5c8c.
Although, Ivey _probably_ primarily raises straight-flush draws the flop, he would definitely occasionally have those in his range. I’m not sure if he’d be more likely to raise the flop with one of those-more than the other; But, I’d guess that he’d be more likely to flat the flop with 8c5c since that has less outs than 3c5c; Although, he may have looked at it the opposite way.
So: Ivey *definitely* has 77 and J7s in his range 100% of the time.
He has a decent percentage of (suited-clubs) A2, A3, A5, A8, A9, A10.
As well as the bare Ace with Ac4x, Ac6x.
He occasionally has 66, 44, J6, J4s, AcJd, AcJs.
And although rare, he could also have 8c5 and 3c5c…
Can anyone tell me all the possible bluffs Ivey can have in this spot-That make Mike’s fold “so horrible”?
Mike is more concerned about his peers making fun of him than losing an extra $37k
I think Phil actually miss read Mike and was raising on what was perceived ‘weakness in his mind’ not knowing his opponent had the second best flush. Mike is so tight he helped make this bluff work though still got to give Ivy credit for great play even if his timing was a little lucky.
I think he understood that a weak raise on the river indicates a club but not the Ace.
He played on this and the fact there was a pair out there, creating the possibility of a boat.
@@raukurawaihaha People sometimes raise small even with really good hands to induce a over the top bluff or induce a call. I stand by my thesis that Phil got lucky and Mike is too tight. Mike should factor that Phil bluffs more often and should give him a wider range than others. Meaning Mike should lay down that same hand against someone who's not great at bluffing but never against Phil in that situation.
@@rbaddict2947 I agree that Mike is too tight. That's what cost him this hand. It was a standard bluff and a really bad lay down.
@@rbaddict2947they never used to bet small to induce in the olden days. Everyone would play so bad before solvers hence why some players like Ivey and durr would completely dominate.
Absolutely. This isn’t a great bluff - it’s a bad fold
not really the greatest bluff of all time....there are like over ten bluffs from durrr alone on high stakes that I'd rate above this.
That's right ... Tom Dwan's bluffs are N1 !!!
Agree this was such a weak bluff after checking, title is so misleading
@@stevemuzira9155 it was a good bluff cause he chose the right player to make it against.
@Rajiv jaigopal wadhwa two things, 1) name over 10 durrr bluffs on HSP that you’d rate above this, lol.
2) point still well taken because Ivey, himself, has several bluffs better than this one.
He storms like 👁️👁️👄 ...
This was a great float and bet on that river. Good read
Another hand I like was from fulltil cash game season 5 ep 5 I think.. Ivey vs Benyamin vs antonious.. where Ivey Ivey floated, got Patrick off his better trips then for Benyamin off his flush on the river by the way the board came out. Simply great play 🤙
The way Phil Ivey "talks trash" reminds me of my mother. Years ago, my son and I were visiting my parents during the NBA Finals. My parents, although in their late 70's at the time, had the NBA Ticket and would watch the Golden State Warriors no matter how late they played and were big fans of Steph Curry. My son has been a fan of LeBron James from the time he knew what a basketball was and we had all retired to the family room after a wonderful dinner. Kevin Durant was giving the entire Cavaliers team a lesson and their lead seemed to be growing by the minute. My mom brought my son a generous portion of cake and ice cream, handed it to him, and then asked, "Are you enjoying the game?" She then sat down next to him in her recliner, returned her gaze to the game with a wry smile on her face. It was kind and brutal at the same time.
Brilliant bluff by the master.
Sometimes you have to play the player and not the cards which is what Phil did here.
I would not call it the greatest bluff of all time.
I would call it the dumbest fold of all time.
Paired board...second nut flush...against one of the greatest players of all time. Its not a dumb fold
@KingGogh Still is. Ivey or not Ivey, math distribution is the same. The bluff was mediocre and the laydown was absurd.
People always shove all in for the big bluff but the small value bet looking bluffs look much stronger.
From 15 to 52 k isnt that small but i get what you mean
Thing is most people are calling in that situation
That little smirk by Ivey did it. The GOAT.
I wouldn't call it the greatest bluff of all time but it's a good one.
It doesn’t get much better then that in cash
You wouldn’t call really there’s only 1 card in 52 that can beat you
That’ like folding a high flush in the chance of a royal flush
There's all kinds of cards that could beat Mike, pocket 7s, pocket 4s, J7, pocket 6s, Ac, J6, etc.
Not sure if it was so much a great bluff from Ivey or a donk fold from Matusow.
What show/event is this from? I’d like to watch all of it with this lineup
The greatest bluff of all time is not a poker video it’s “carrot in a box” on 8 out of 10 cats does countdown
the guy who lost twice to the same guy should never sit down at the felt, thats a given
I definitely would have called no matter if I took a bad beat I would have wanted to know if Ivey was bluffing.
Yep. How does he not call?
Matusow played his hand so face up with his action on the river
Exactly, he gave away so much information, opening the door for Ivy to bluff and closing the possibility that he might be representing a full house.
@@rbaddict2947 The way we bet or call is genuinely the means of interaction between poker players and you bet on the river yet you have no clue while being countered. Well, I really have no words especially for players of this level...
But what else could he have done other than bet second nut flush?
@@koladeabdulrahman3359 THe point is Matusow gave away too much info with his mannerisms/tells (allowing Ivy to sense weakness), then he folded when he should have called. You call someone who bluffs a lot in that situation. Pretty obvious mistakes that a pro shouldn't make
@@rbaddict2947 I love how freeroll players on CZcams give poker advice to professional players.
reminds me of a KGB line "lays down a monster, how the f you lay that down?"
Chris Moneymaker made the greatest bluff of all time against Farha.
what i'm fascinated by is how a pro decides what is going to mess with an opponent more: to tell them you had it or didn't have it? on one hand, you want your opponent to think you play with great hands. on the other hand, you want your opponent to second guess their decisions and be confused.
Good question.
you want a balance between the two.
often times when I have a bluff on a small pot, I pay only to see ho my opponent played that hand and to show him I have a bluff so next time I'm nuts he thinks I'm bluffing.
@@danilopablo9848 but win you win a pot because they folded, how do you determine then to lie or be honest of your hand?
This is why you don’t play poker without a bankroll.
@@zaproodas9626
Mike plays with backers.
This cannot believe that a single person stakes him in cash games, he was a great tournament player but he was by far the weakest player in every tv high stakes cash game.
@@lukash8052
The do he’s know for being a cash game horse, and yeah he’s pretty bad, there was an episode of High Stakes Poker when he had one bullet, everyone knew it was a stake an picked on him.
A man like Phil Ivy is a man no matter what. God already has that title its foolish to compare a mere mortal to the God of the heavens and the earth.
LOL. chris fergusson just folding KQ is hilarious. such a NIT. what does he only open AK +?
He is a tight player. He knows he is going to be three betted often, and will not know where he is at oop.
He has been player of the year, and won a gazillion dollars playing the game agaibst the greatest, i think i know what he is doing.
Not that i like him, nor his playstyle.
that style worked fine in the 90's and 00's but he's not player of the year anymore playing like a nit@@IZn0g0uDatAll
I’m snapping every single time the way that hand played LOL
This was 15 years ago, they played way differently lol back in those days you wouldn't be snapping anything against Phil Ivey.
@@chriswilson1968 15 years ago here in Houston game was crazy too. I would 100% be snapping against Ivey especially when his range is super wide.... the reason Ivey made that play is because It was mike the mouth. Super nit super bad player.. he wouldn’t try that against pretty much anyone else At that table. Great play by Ivey.
@@SwayPromo Yeah mainly cuz it was Mike. But it did really look a lot Ac. Also kinda made it look like he wanted to c/r the turn. Mike still losses to a good amount of combos. These days it would a insta call for sure.
@@chriswilson1968 yeah I looked back at how the hand played out and I just don’t ever put Ivey on Ac there. If he has It he has It. I think it’s 100% only because it’s mike. Nonetheless it’s a brilliant play by Ivey because he knows mike so well. At my game there’s certain guys I do goofy shit like this all the time to even on dry boards and they fold most of the time. LOL gotta love poker. You definitely understand the game a lot. I appreciate the convo. Lots of combos definitely can be there.
Easy to play when you see the cards
Phil got lucky representing the flush when Mike had the flush. That's a case of having too much respect for the better player. We have all done it they have a mental hold on you
Ivey was repping a full house...
@@eljimberinoq5518 he said I had the ace . He was repping the nut flush
Matasaw discussed this hand and said he put Ivey on a full house. Its on youtube on the following season. Mike was criticizing the play where Ivey won a large pot against the young bad player (forgot his name) with the Ace high flush and was called with King high flush. He said that was the worst call he ever saw. Then Ivey needled him about when he laid down king high flush. The mouth said he put Ivey on full=house.
@@eljimberinoq5518 I think Ivey in his mind was representing the Flush. He put Mike on an over pair and when mike looked at his cards to see if he had a flush he knew he didn't have AA. (people for some reason remember their suits with Aces more than other pairs. The funny thing is Mike later on said he put Ivey on a full-house. This deduction makes no sense based on how the hand was played. This is why Mike has gone broke many times and needs to get staked for tournaments. Its actually surprising how some players don't study the game who you see on TV. Only a few have taken their games to higher levels due to admitting the game has evolved. (negreanu, Ivey, dwan types their games constantly keep up to date)
Phil is the Poker king
There is an overrated poker player named Phil Hellmuth so better to say Ivy than confused the two.
@@rbaddict2947 overrated with the most bracelets and 2 main event wins?
Matusow is such a great poker player 😂
He leaned on him with the bigger stack. Mike fighting for survival hoping he will catch something big later. Been there before
Mike is no beginner but I've made him think about his life. Hahahaha
the best bluff was 'early dwan' vs ivey in high stakes poker - maybe 15 - 18 years ago... you remember THAT one?
The one where Tom 'acted' so scared, gulped. One of the best bluffs
Snap call. If he has Ac you just got to pay him. Yes it’s paired… if he has the boat or quads again pay him.
Might not of ran that bluff if Mike doesn’t do the club check n say forgot what I had. Seemed genuine which caps him at a flush. Ivey range is uncapped in that board
Yeah, I think the card check was a huge tell. Phil's gotta be thinking that Mike would remember if he had the A of clubs without checking the cards, so the card check means he has a lower one.
Can you please learn the difference between "might not of" and "might not have" ? Thanks.
Perhaps I am a bad poker player but I would definitely have called the reraise. Losing with a King high flush to an Ace high flush or a full house is no shame. Surprised Matusow didn't make that move.
Je partage ton avis. Il a joué comme un véritable fish.
I am unsure if it was appropriate for Benyamin to comment "Two Kings with a club". I am sure that if he can guess the cards then Matusow potentially can think that Ivey saw it also and that's why he bet.
everyone knows dwan has like the top10 sickest bluffs to his name all with more money involved
This is more like the worst fold then the best bluff. Ivey wouldn't have bluffed if he knew what Mike had.
He knew Mike had a K or Q high flush obviously
He even said after the hand “did you have queen of clubs?”
Nailed it. Very well said.
@@paulg6274 What's hilarious is that this situation happened to another player where Ivey actually did have the A of clubs and villain had K of clubs and Ivey went all in. Villain did make the call and Matusow said "that is the WORST call anyone has ever made". In his mind Ivey could never be bluffing so no surprise he folded here.
Online Poker: Calls with 2 of clubs
3:30. Id give my whole stack to know what phils thinking.
I cant believe that guy folded. I dont think Phil was brilliant here, but the other guy doesnt seem to understand odds
Did Matusow ask Benyamine "good pass" at the end? And Benyamine shook his head? Lmao!
"what you have queen of clubs or something?" He knew exactly what he had and that he could get him off it.
Tom Dwan always looks like the kid on the playground who's afraid of getting his lunch money taken ...
No offense to Phil Ivey, but this is more of a terrible fold by Mike than it is a great bluff by Phil. If Phil knew Mike had Kc there's no shot he's attempting this bluff. Probably put him on a range 7,8,9,10,Qc.
Mike has to make this call 10/10 times or else he's being incredibly exploitable. If Ivey has pocket 4,6,7 or Ac then so be it. But that's even more unlikely since Ivey at that time liked to fast pair sets on boards with IP PFRs on boards with draws.
All in all, if Mike is too afriad of losing ~$40k making this call then it means he's playing stakes waaay out of his league
I couldn't sit there listening to them play with those chips constantly
I don't know. It's just a common line. You check with sdv and if villains bets you are not winnings anymore and turn the hand into a bluff especially when you are oop and villain checked on turn back and more especially when villain is bad. Bluff must work more than 50% to show profit so mutosow must call 50% and look... He tanks with basically his second best hand besides some slowplays 😂
The description says "Phil Ivey has just 1 hand to represent and manages to get a fold." It was actually two, correct? The ace of clubs and a full house?
what was their stacks tho?
Can’t believe that fold tho
this was set up all by mike checking his cards, this told Ivey everything he needed to know, you know for sure if you have a full house or a a high flush, when he checked to see if he had the flush and then value bet Ivey now can figure that the best hand mike could have is the exact hand he had which could be beat by A of clubs or by any pocket pairs of 4,6, or 7 all hands which Ivey could have easily checked with being out of position to get mike to bluff. This is why you don't check your cards. even doing so as a bluff is a bad idea.
If you bet on the river there then you better be prepared to put it all in. Folding there is just playing scared.
If I got the king of clubs let alone pocket Kings on a flush, I'm calling every time u just gotta live with it. That was a terrible fold
Phil Ivey's eyes make a shark's eyes look warm
He couldn't have run off anyone else at that table with that raise BUT Mike. What he knew about Mike: had a flush, maybe KK, QQ, AK, AQ. But he also knew Mike was a weak player who needed the money. Mike was NOT playing optimal poker with a bank roll and could be easily manipulated, and he also just wasn't as sharp as others. Mike also saw himself as a loser with a victim mentality. Phil knows this about Mike. Mike can be bullied. I know what you have, and know you are weak. All of that comes into play.
If ( just hoping) I play with Ivey I will just give him the money,after he stares at me for whole hour.. 😂😂😂
Pretty gay imo
I would have went all in with the king of clubs
same
This makes no sense. If Phil had the Ace of Clubs he would never check the river like that. It isn't a good bluff, Mike just made a horrible play.
When the entire world was playing Checkers …
Phil Ivey was the only one playing Chess.
I think I've thought he had the ace of clubs 🤣
Poker so easy back then. In 2020 ain’t no one folding kk with 2nd nut flush 😊
Matsow thinking how great he is for making this fold.
Getting 3-1 to call the river
He has to call
Will DB come out of retirement?
IF Mike M made money old players must have been REALLY really bad
Best Comment on here!!!
@@mariobrown2471 or he was just lucky
3 to 1 to call the river what a dumb fold
Mike's mouth gave it away saying "can't remember what I have"
One low key thing in this hand is I think Phil is giving Mike a big pair because hellmuth tank folded and he could be going off his read also.
However I don’t think Mike is ever betting without a club.
So at worst Mike maybe has the 10 of clubs. But eeeven that he probably doesn’t bet.
I think the worst hand Mike shows up here with is the Q of clubs.
If you’re gonna play tight then you need to be able to bluff catch well.
Problem for Mike is that he is probably thinking phil knows that he is never betting that thin here so either Phil has some maniac bluff or he has him beat.
But we know Phil isn’t a maniac so he probably timed this bluff well.
Mike really looked like he didn’t like that turn card.
Bet- folding that river is really bad. Nothing better is ever folding there and worse hands from a solid player which Ivey has could turn it into a bluff.
Mike is probably not snap checking back the turn with 44 or 66. The turn is an amazing card to bet for value with those hands. Maybe Ivey put Mike on a J?
It really leans more towards Mike didn’t like the turn.
I do agree with the other comment that Phil got a little lucky because Mike had a pretty strong hand. This is potentially the worst hand Mike bets on the river. But given the action and flow of the hand it’s possible that this maybe the only hand Mike has.
Matusaw gave a tell by looking at his cards and he looked not confident and than he his behaviour looked weak in how he betted his flush. Phil knew he didn't have the Ace flush.
no disrespect to Phil but Matusow was not playing in his comfort zone and was already pot committed; thats a snap call.
I hear he’s even BETTER at
when the conditions are relight
I don’t see how not to call. Ivey usually shouldn’t get to the river with a FH or an Ace-high-flush…
Guy lookin like a vampire…good pokerface too.
It was a good bluff and play but it was also against a bad play and fold
Ivy: freak smile😎
This isn’t even close to the best bluff I’ve seen tonight let alone ever.
When I first saw Ivey I thought to myself the Tiger Woods of Poker
Say it with me..."There are no monsters under your bed. There are no monsters under your bed..."
Phil just sits there like a statue😅
LOLOL poor mike playing with his net worth on the table
I would of called that 100% of the time haha.
me 2 its 2 handed with very little that beats it the odds were ridiculous for that pot
Matasow checking his cards lost him the hand. He makes it clear he doesn't have a house and also loses all his suited Ax combos
If you were not broke like Mattusow (the Information Phil had, probably makes the bluff even better) it is an easy call
I had "The Ace!" Allowing whomever to infer the A clubs
greatest bluff of all time was telling my mom i did the dishes before she let me out of the house to a party.
Never value bet on the river against Phil Ivey.
Mikes brain: "I know that 4ssh0le has A8 of clubs. What a lucky bst4d. "
Mike has always been very tight player, and Ivey just used it.
The announcers are so cringe lmao. “You can buy a brand new mercedes s class with that pot!” “What HEART to make a bet like that. What heart! Incredible!”
The EPT Monte Carlo vs Paul Jackson is the number 1
Ivey knows Mike is a nit.
takes forever
It's really only Ivey that can possibly do that! A flush, with a K , high card. Wow.
do what? get lucky? terrible fold
How good is Benyamine? 2 kings with the club😮😊. Phil didn’t lie, he had the Ace but not the right ace😂
If you look at the way the hand was played, this is a great hand to bluff by Phil. Matusow was the original raiser from middle position representing a strong preflop hand (big to mid pairs, AK, AQ). Phil on the other hand is in the big blind and could be defending with a number of hands (mid to small pairs, suited connectors, Broadway hands. So Phil has in his range sets of 4s, 6s, and 7s. He also has some Js, AJ, KJ, QJ, J10. He also has the made straight draw in his range 35. Phil is also most likely to have the A of clubs in this spot giving the idea that he could be calling preflop with any big Ace or Suited Ace.. Phil is most likely betting on the idea that the only strong hands that Matusow has is an over pair, or a few A of clubs, and the unlikely JJ. Maybe Matusow has a few Broadway J hands.the likelihood of him folding to a raise is very high based on all the hands Phil cold have him beat with. I'm all, it was the correct fold by Matusow, even though he had Phil beat in hand. And it was a good spot to bluff by Phil . So to some things up, either Matusow has the board dominated with quad Js or a Broadway hand with the A of club. Or he has a marginal hand that can be folded to a raise. Phil Phil on the other hand could have any boat, Nut flush, or a straight.
You do realise that Matusow beats straights and trips like AJ? He's got a flush himself, and the second best one at that.
So I think the fold is probably incorrect since Matusow is almost at the top of his range here. If he fold the King of clubs here, I think he can be too easily bluffed in this spot.
@@fritzzz1372@fritzzz1372 thank you for saying it. This guy wrote a book in a yt comment and doesn't seem to realize Mike had the 2nd nut flush. He loses to full house and Ac only.
For MM to believe Phil has Ac, he must believe Phil called the bet on the flop with A high and then checked to the aggressor when he turned the nut flush draw. PI would not check the nut flush draw on the turn out of position to a guy who just c bet the flop. He finally got big equity in the hand, I think he would bet that.
Most importantly, with 4 to a flush on the board, Ac out of position is very unlikely to check that to the guy who slowed on the turn when the 3rd club hit. He's at risk of not getting his value bet paid for hitting the 2nd nuts.
Folding the winning hand is never the correct fold. That's the dumbest saying.
Of course folding the winning hand can be the correct action.
Clearly Matusow put him on a pocket pair, likely 77. I think Ivey disclosing an A was a mistake. Albeit a sly one, admittedly.
No way Ivey would have checked the turn if he had the Ace of clubs.
Worst fold ever maybe
it's definitely a contender haha
LMAO!!!