I like the rugged clunky look of the Blundstone. That Thursday boot looks like something my sister's hairdresser would wear. I also have Redbacks. I have high arches. The Redbacks are painful on the top of my foot.
@@pinchpeak5203 I have friends that wear them everyday for work, hiking, going out and they’re still going strong and comfy after years. So meh whatever that’s enough for me
Splitting hairs but Blundstone aren’t glued, they’re thermally injected directly on the uppers so a bit more durable and definitely water proofed. In Australia Blunnies are used as work boots by builders so aren’t expected to stay unscratched and unmarked.
The idea that Blundstones have issues with water ingress is crazy. I have worn them for 25 years for use in wet snow as a winter boot in Canada. Keep the leather proofed with Nikwax a few times a year and they are perfect.
These other boots must be amazing because on average ALL of my Blundstones have lasted 5-7 yrs w regular, hard wear. That dates back to when I first started wearing them in 1996. Blundstones ARE good wuality boots too.
Redbacks are injection molded-on soles, just like Blunnies, but you didn't mention that. Having had both Redbacks and Blunnies, I prefer Blunnies - they're more comfortable. Both pairs got into the wet on the regular and were fine, so I don't know why you say they leak. I have an orthotic in my Blunnies and the fit is perfect. My Redbacks, on the other hand, had a center seam on the seam that created a pressure point on the instep and I could never soften it... even with my orthotic, my feet would be crying out in pain (all over) by dinnertime. Had to donate them. As for scratches in Blunnies (I'm wearing mine today) it's no wukkas. The boots don't care and I don't care. Yeah, Blunnies aren't made in Oz anymore, and it's fashionable to hate on them... lots of people do. It's okay to like what you like, but I'll be buying another pair of Blunnies when these wear out. Cheers!
I almost never see hate on blunds almost always people hyping them beyond comprehension. However, I’ve never had I just more so see hype around blundstones
I'm no boot connesuir but I love my blundstones. They're just great all rounders. And as an Australian who used to live in Canada (where everyone I knew owned at least one pair of blundstones) I'm fairly sure that they are much cheaper here than they are in north America (just picked some up this week for $150). This makes them a reasonable choice considering their compromises on quality. And they're comfy af.
Blundstones are my go to daily drivers. They're almost as comfy as sneakers and you get the added durability of the leather and the rubber sole. When you break down all of the elements of the boots and compare them to other boots than yeah I guess it makes sense to buy other boots. But holistically the Blundstones just work for what they are. They're pricey but considering they're the boot I use the most I would say it was worth it. Most people that write a review on the Blundstones tend to agree.
I’ve never had but a lot of people I see who’ve bought blunds for years say the past few have been dramatically worse. Again I have no idea what do you think about them not being made in Australia? Some don’t care but one can’t argue the deterioration generally expected when outsourcing has commenced.
@@dominiccortez4499 I got mine less than a year ago so I can't compare them to how they were built previously. I still love them and wear them all the time. I think they could probably stand to be a bit less pricey considering where they're manufactured and the materials but I'm happy with my purchase all the same. No way I would pay more than what they're worth now though.
@@pinchpeak5203 as opposed to imaginary ones? I’m not sure what you mean by “real” boots but I own Iron Rangers, Blacksmiths, Higgins Mills, RW moc toes, Chisos cowboy boots, RW classic chelseas and a few more pairs of heritage made Goodyear welted boots if that’s what you mean. Blundstones are still my go to for the reasons I stated above.
Plumber here. I wear Blundstones practically every day. Solid boots. Very, very tough. I put them through a great deal of torture and they hold up just as good as any Danner or Thorogood.
I skipped blundstones and went for redbacks. They survived a phosphorus chemical spill and 6 months continued work with chemicals, 5 arborist work, and were submerged in a river clearing out brush before funky needing to be replaced. Still made in AU unlike blundstone.
The Blundstones and the Redbacks will also suffer from hydrolysis of the mid and outsoles because of the TPU and PU materials. Any footwear with these polyurethanes must be worn on a regular basis to not have the soles disintegrate.
For all the reasons you mentioned, i love my Jim Greens. I'll add they are advertised as, and actually made in South Africa (unlike Bluestone's "Tazmania" logo even though theyre made in China/Vietnam). I'll also add that the company Jim Green does great wildlife conservation work and treats their workers very well compared to other boot manufacturers. They certainly lack the foamy comfort of my old Blundstones, but make up for it with a more rugged, resolable, outsile and wider toe box.
I've worn Thursday, Red Wing, RM William and many more - and none of them could ever touch the comfort of my Blundstones. And some of the things you say are simply not true. Blundstone indeed uses full grain leather and the claim that they would leak right away is pretty funny as I've never had any leather boot that are more waterproof than Blundstone. They held up astoundingly well for years and years (not month). And you can just put in any insole to make it "your" boot and most comfortable this side of your favorite slippers. To me, in the real world, they're worth more the money than pretty much any other boot.
I have their African ranger boots, I'm surprised you haven't heard of them before, they probably have the best boots on the market in the $200 dollar price range with most being less than 200, they're all pretty wide which some won't like but is probably nicer on your feet, especially wider feet
You're kidding right? Not saying they're the best thing out there, but Doc construction is extremely legit. And material quality is high. Doc and BS are apples and oranges.
@@chadgraber4575 nah mate, Doc's quality is on par with some 100$ market shoes. One stitch breaks and they fall apart, and they don't have a shank. It's not high quality, it's blatantly bad mostly plasticy garbage made cheaply.
Thanks for this video. I’d just ordered the Blundstones when I saw your video. So I ordered the Thursdays to be able to compare the two. Side by side, the Thursdays are dramatically higher quality. It’s just clear. I first thought, do I want to wear the Thursdays in the mud walking the dog? Then I realized the Blundstones were more expensive, so why would it be better to risk damaging them instead of the less expensive Thursdays? I’m not an expert but I’ve worn shoes many decades. A cheap shoe has a look and a fit. If they actually are cheap, then they’re fine for work because they’re easily replaced when they’re soon scuffed and ruined. An expensive cheap shoe gives up this advantage. In terms of style who is to answer? But I felt the more “tailored” construction of the Thursday boot was more to my taste. I thought the Blundstones were sloppy looking. You could say more of a farmyard look. Absolutely valid. I’ve often bought for look instead of quality. In my opinion the Blundstones are made only as good as they need to be. Fine. But then cut some of the savings back to the consumer, why dontcha? You won’t? Then ok, I’ll buy a better boot, better materials, better construction, better style (to me) for less money. Boot Spy, thanks again. You did your viewers a solid.
Not that I care about famous people, but there is a reason famous people wear Blundsrone and not these other boots, you’ll see it in the paparazzi pictures, they are super casual and comfortable and you can rock them with anything, none of these other boots look cool tbh, there is just something missing.
I am not buying your review, all you say is you *think* blundstone will wear off or you *think* water will leak without any solid evidence. While lots of other reviewer or people are saying its stay solid for 4 or 5 years from their experience. Don't put your personal gut feeling on review, we are looking for practical advice not someone else's feeling.
@@fron645 IKR, No casual or heritage boot needs to be treated w/ kid gloves like dress shoes. IR’s don’t look good until after about a 1-3 yrs of regular wear and upkeep. Don’t worry about scuffs embrace them.
I wish redback would make a boot for is in cold climates like Canada. Just 200g of thinsulate in my other work boots makes a world of a difference on winter days
I want a quality Chelsea boot but having trouble getting the right fit, at least with Blundstone. I’m a size 11 shoe but that’s too big on the Blunnnie. Tried 10.5 and 10 but It’s hard to get the ankle, toes and sides all working together. Not concerned with the top because that will break on. The redback fit was better but not a stylish. Is it a matter of getting the right insert? I don’t want the fit to be dependent on sock thickness.
It's super interesting to see the difference in price point internationally (maybe from being shipped over?). I've mostly seen them for $150-$250AUD depending on its the official website or a store, while Timberlands and Doc Martens are closer to $300 AUD and before shipping, Thursdays start at $300. Good year welts and full grain leathers more often start at twice Blundstone's local price point; at least in Australia, its more like a $100-$120 USD boot than a $200 USD one because it IS one.
I've owned a pair of Blunnies for about 3 years now and I won't get another pair. They're okay boots and a step up from Doc Martens but the surface level dye on the leather really bothers me. They're comfortable enough I guess but the inserts are useless and have to be replaced often. I'm sure they were much better in the beginning but they're just another trend boot.
Where would you get "cooler material", BootSpy? Do you have a bunch of spare coolers laying around your house? Like someone who would review coolers or something. So many questions... Nice to see the Red Wings are getting some love. You're killing it in that shirt, by the way.
I'd love to try Thursday boots but sadly they don't have official stores in the UK and ordering through distributors can be very expensive if the size and fit isn't to your liking. I contacted Thursday to ask when they plan on opening stores here or having a UK based webshop and they don't have plans at the moment. Our American friends will have to enjoy these lovely boots a little longer on their own :(
You are mistaken about Jim green being leather midsole. It has a fabricated board material. Having said that, they are a rough boot and a superior value. Great leather,tough outsole, leather lined, you can't beat them. And I don' t agree that wider toes are less attractive. A different look. Honest, rugged, reliable boot. Jim greens are awesome. You forgot another brand that is also superior. Wesco. They make a Romeo,they are absolutely top shelf in
I really wanna know which is the most comfortable for standing for long periods of time. Cuz I have blundstones, and I swear by their comfiness. I was thinking of getting the redbacks just cuz I hear they're even more comfortable (Rose Anvil). I'd love to get the Thursdays, but they don't seem that comfortable for standing for long periods of time
So I've had my redbacks for a solid year (After watching rose anvil too) doing maintenance and going up and down stairs at least 8 hrs a day. I've never complained about putting my boots on the next morning. Make sure you pay attention to the sizing. I am a U.S. size 10 and I got a size 9 AU. If I needed a wide size then I would have gotten a 9.5 AU. Also I got the upgraded leather insole which helped me tons. Definitely will buy more redbacks
When I had blind stones I worked in a store where i had to stand all day plus walk all over the store. I walked 10km plus per day. I had the blind stones for 2 years and now I’m wearing the red backs. I have to say I prefer the red backs. Way more comfortable, the leather is more durable and price is insanely cheap.
Red Wing made a Romeo boot but the discontinued it it was part of the King Toe series it was model “3510” was available in “EE” and “H” widths it was 👍
Hi @bootspy, although I’ve loved my Blundstones for almost two years, I got annoyed by them because their soles are literally melting very soon if you’re near a pitfire. Happened to me twice already and it’s not that I’ve jumped in the ashes if you know what I mean. Do you know, if the soles of any of the mentioned boots would make a difference in that regard? Would be very helpful to know. Thank you!
The blundstone 585 is a great lightweight boot with amazing comfort. That thursday boot looks weird man. Blundstone has become a more fashion icon, and so they’re in the position to charge a little more. And seriously, you can’t measure ‘best’. It’s all about taste.
Thanks for the information. It was very useful. I have a pair of Blundstone's and the sole exploded after not wearing them during the pandemic year and a half. I don't understand why they don't just use Goodyear welted soles to begin with. I have 15-year old boots with Goodyear and Vibram soles that haven't had this problem. The Blunnie's also have a scratch that I could not fix. Blundstone's seem to be way overpriced to me. I'll never buy another pair unless they fix their sole 'hydrolysis' problem, which was not mentioned here. I guess you've not experienced that issue...
I own a pair of Blundstone #663 which I believe are only available in Australia and while they don't seem to have a good year welt, for $120-$130AUD (~$80-$85USD) shipped they seem like good value to me especially since they use full grain leather as opposed to the "premium leather" used in their 500/550/600 models. #659 model is the brown leather whereas the #663 is the black leather. The RRP is $154AUD (~$103USD) but they're always available cheaper at various outlets.
I’m in the market for a chelsea boot more on the rugged/casual side. I was pretty much set on the Legend, but Beckett Simonon’s new Silva boot is starting to catch my eye. Any idea on how the 2 compare? I have 3 pairs of Thursdays, so I know what I would be getting with the Legend, but i have not had any experience with Beckett Simonon. I do like how the Silva has a bit of a rounder toe, almost like a Redwing chelsea with a lugged sole. Also, I wear more slim straight jeans, nothing too tapered. Not sure if this will make the sleeker Legend look a little funny since almost all the reviewers I’ve seen review the Legend wear very tapered jeans. Any input would be appreciated
brother. you simply cannot be talking about "slimmer" or "more stylish" when that is exactly the opposite of what I want when I choose to wear chelsea work boots. since I actually half care about my foot health and toe posture, no I am not going to squeeze my foot into a tiny toebox because it is "stylish". I think blundstones have a good balance of aesthetics and comfortability, a more exaggerated version of this would be the jim green stockmans with a massive toe box.
I like my Danner Chelsea at $230 or $170 on Black Friday. These are like slippers, if not the most work oriented.. Price no object Nicks recently introduced a series of Chelseas, typical for Nicks they are tank like.
Hey man, love the videos. very clear, high quality content. Really appreciate all the on foot shots. Subscribed. Could I please ask about a size question. I wear the timberland earth keepers in 10.5 regular and I’m hoping to upgrade to grant stone brass boot after watching your vid. What size would you recommend? Also your styling is awesome and the time stamps and attention to details of your reviews are incredibly thoughtful
I would try the 10.5d for the brass too (assuming you wear 11 in sneakers). It's been a while since I wore the earth keepers, but I remember them fitting pretty large
@@BootSpy perfect Thankyou man really appreciate this, would you also recommend the same size for the iron ranger? I normally wear 11 with the Air Force1 and 9.5uk-G with the rm Williams
@@BootSpy cheers:) if you had to pick between the iron rangers and the grant stone diesel boot/ maybe the Ottawa which would win. could be good vs video?
Would just like to suggest checking out Solovair’s Dealer Boot as an alternative. -Good year welted -a few different leather, safety and elastic band options. -made in england -better than docs imo
Totally agree on Solovair. I am wildly impressed by my Dealer and Astronaut boots. And my Redbacks are wonderfully comfortable. Both brands are better than their more popular rivals. The only drawback is neither have stores in the US, so you are taking a chance with mail ordering.
I had 2 pairs of solovairs. 2 minor drawbacks: they are right, so not good for people with wide feet and I find that the sole degrades faster than boots usually do. It’s great that it can easily be resoled but if I have to resole it every year then I don’t feel like I’m buying quality material.
Hey sorry to bother you again, but can i ask about your fit with RM Williams? i got mine in a 9.5G and grant stone recommended size 10D on the leo last. how was your fit with rm in a 9G ? again very sorry to bother you with this
Are you using the 500s(originals) or 550s(classics) because this sounds like the 500(originals). The 550s(classics) are much better than 500(originals). Make sure you’re doing a fair review for the viewers.
Yeah, now that they're made in China, the leather is cheaper, and double what they used to cost, definitely a gouge. But, they still work better than all just due to the design, fashion aside, which is what you seem to prioritize. They were designed to be an all day comfort work and kick around boot, and still suit the bill. Mine go from warehouse, boat captaining, riding motorcycles, and the bar or dinner all without taking them off. That thursday boot would fall apart in a second in the real world.
Totally missed the point blundstone is a work boot, such and such is better cos it's more stylish 😆 comical. Aussie workboots are awesome but I prefer redbacks and mongrel personally due to blunnies being too pricey for what you get, redbacks have a full 3mm leather for less money . Jim green are known as a goodboot, doc martens are dirt. And as for leaking I've never ever had a pair of any Aussie boot leak. In Ireland these elastic side workboots are called a dealer boot, Chelsea boots are the same elastic side boot but are the poncey "stylish" dress boot 😂 where boys are concerned with how they look as opposed to how they work
NONE of these boots cater to women’s sizes :( would’ve bought the Jim green ones. (Okay well the Thursdays do but I’m looking for outdoor boots) that’s why blind stones are so popular IMO
Redacks are not more comfortable than Blundstones. And all my Blundstones have lasted a minimum of 5 years using them at the construction site and wearing them in the garden. They get wet regularly and I have not experienced the issues you claim with the water in the sole.
i liked everything said about the Thursday so i went to the site. oops, seems no wide options. so why would i even consider them, no matter the quality difference? also, i'm no blundstone fanboy, but it matters when you can walk into a store, try on a pair and walk out with the shoes and box in hand.
@@arynvidsa the problem with Redbacks is they look like safety boots with the horrible clear soles and air cushion cells. I don’t doubt they are great boots in regards to durability and comfort, but Blundstone’s look a lot more stylish and this is perhaps why they are so popular outside of Australia also. The 585’s I’ve had since January still look brand new and I’ve worn them nearly everyday for 8 months. So durable and comfortable and they put to bed the myth Asian QC is inferior to the rest of the World.
God!!!... The boot internet is getting annoyingly populated by Thursday sponsored crap!!...... The answer to every bloody thing is a "Thursday" boot....
Have to agree about the Blundstones....they used to be the gold standard here in Australia and were made about 100 kms from where I live.....then they obviously got greedy and decided to get them made off shore to maximize their profits. In doing doing so minimized their quality and also their fit. They used to be comfortable right from new but now are no where near that in any of their boots. Was a sad day when they did this. I bet they regret their decision now in this day and age where home grown products are what everyone wants...not overseas junk. Changing the subject...what would you recommend as the best value hiking/jungle boot that's super durable, comfortable and not too heavy. I do a lot of bush walking through fairly rugged terrain and clear the walking tracks from time to time. Have been using steel blue work boots for some time but their comfort after a few hours leaves a bit to be desired. Cheers!
If you're reading this, don't let this guy's biased review fool you. Just because he personally doesn't like Blundstones, doesn't mean that they aren't incredibly comfortable, durable, and versatile boots. Get a pair for yourself and you'll see what I mean.
It’s true that my review is biased: I’ve tried over 100 pairs of boots in the years since running this channel. And when I tried Blundstones and looked at the materials inside, they weren’t nearly as good as many other options out there that you can get for much cheaper. So in that way, yes, I’m biased against blundstone because they’re objectively not as well built, versatile, or comfortable as other boots you can find for the same price.
You clearly missed the point of Blundies from the getgo my dude, they’re a cheap as shit, tradies boot, designed to be worn hard and beat to shit, but comfortable enough to get through the day. It’s designed to be cheap, beaten up and replaced.
Or you could spend a little more and have something that lasts 4x longer. You can buy good boots and still beat them up. But you won't need to throw them away...you can just keep wearing them.
Please consider Blundstones vegan shoes. They put alot of care into making these including the thread. The sole is very breathable and the shoes look as good as the original. They don't have a synthetic look or feel and are very durable.
@@BootSpy ahhh sorry, my bad, you are right. They have done a collaboration with Finisterre, which is the vegan version. I thought Blunderstone was just the model name
I’m a straight man not a trans man so I’ll pass on the Thursdays 😂you have made not one case against the blundstone , they look better and are more comfortable… what’s your problem dude😂🤷🏼♂️
I am not really a boot guy as I normally wear minimalist sneekers, or oxfords. Not Derby’s or a Bluchers because why? And never split-toes. I wouldn’t purchase any boot that had a square toe or bulbous toe shape like crocks. Those Blundstones have those shapes. Ugly and dated. They may be good boots, but to me they resemble clown shoes. People buy crocks so there appears to still be a market for the style. They are just not for me.
I like the rugged clunky look of the Blundstone. That Thursday boot looks like something my sister's hairdresser would wear. I also have Redbacks. I have high arches. The Redbacks are painful on the top of my foot.
I it’s wtf is this guy on. Bluestones ftw my mates have had theirs for years and still going strong and swears by them
@@pengy5340 A lot of people swear by Blundstones. A lot of people know nothing about actual boots
@@pinchpeak5203 I have friends that wear them everyday for work, hiking, going out and they’re still going strong and comfy after years. So meh whatever that’s enough for me
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Well im glad you prefer a rugged look over an actual better made and more rugged boot lmao. At least your sisters hairdresser has some taste.
Splitting hairs but Blundstone aren’t glued, they’re thermally injected directly on the uppers so a bit more durable and definitely water proofed. In Australia Blunnies are used as work boots by builders so aren’t expected to stay unscratched and unmarked.
I definitely agree coming from an Australian working on job sites my whole life 👍🏻🇦🇺
Red Wings are a better work boot
The idea that Blundstones have issues with water ingress is crazy. I have worn them for 25 years for use in wet snow as a winter boot in Canada. Keep the leather proofed with Nikwax a few times a year and they are perfect.
These other boots must be amazing because on average ALL of my Blundstones have lasted 5-7 yrs w regular, hard wear. That dates back to when I first started wearing them in 1996. Blundstones ARE good wuality boots too.
thanks for sharing
Sounds like you have nothing to compare them to...
@@pinchpeak5203 just Redbacks, Keen, old Simples and a pair of Rossis.
I have worn Blundstone, Red Wing Chelsea Rancher, and Red Back. For me, the Blundstones just fit better, and do not leak. So much more versatile.
Redbacks are injection molded-on soles, just like Blunnies, but you didn't mention that. Having had both Redbacks and Blunnies, I prefer Blunnies - they're more comfortable. Both pairs got into the wet on the regular and were fine, so I don't know why you say they leak. I have an orthotic in my Blunnies and the fit is perfect. My Redbacks, on the other hand, had a center seam on the seam that created a pressure point on the instep and I could never soften it... even with my orthotic, my feet would be crying out in pain (all over) by dinnertime. Had to donate them. As for scratches in Blunnies (I'm wearing mine today) it's no wukkas. The boots don't care and I don't care. Yeah, Blunnies aren't made in Oz anymore, and it's fashionable to hate on them... lots of people do. It's okay to like what you like, but I'll be buying another pair of Blunnies when these wear out. Cheers!
Yeah, it's that center seam on the Redbacks that cut into my feet. So incredibly painful after a day of walking and it never stretches. Ugh
I almost never see hate on blunds almost always people hyping them beyond comprehension. However, I’ve never had I just more so see hype around blundstones
I'm no boot connesuir but I love my blundstones. They're just great all rounders. And as an Australian who used to live in Canada (where everyone I knew owned at least one pair of blundstones) I'm fairly sure that they are much cheaper here than they are in north America (just picked some up this week for $150). This makes them a reasonable choice considering their compromises on quality. And they're comfy af.
thanks for sharing
Blundstones are my go to daily drivers. They're almost as comfy as sneakers and you get the added durability of the leather and the rubber sole. When you break down all of the elements of the boots and compare them to other boots than yeah I guess it makes sense to buy other boots. But holistically the Blundstones just work for what they are. They're pricey but considering they're the boot I use the most I would say it was worth it. Most people that write a review on the Blundstones tend to agree.
I’ve never had but a lot of people I see who’ve bought blunds for years say the past few have been dramatically worse. Again I have no idea what do you think about them not being made in Australia? Some don’t care but one can’t argue the deterioration generally expected when outsourcing has commenced.
@@dominiccortez4499 I got mine less than a year ago so I can't compare them to how they were built previously. I still love them and wear them all the time. I think they could probably stand to be a bit less pricey considering where they're manufactured and the materials but I'm happy with my purchase all the same. No way I would pay more than what they're worth now though.
Have you actually tried real boots though?
@@pinchpeak5203 as opposed to imaginary ones? I’m not sure what you mean by “real” boots but I own Iron Rangers, Blacksmiths, Higgins Mills, RW moc toes, Chisos cowboy boots, RW classic chelseas and a few more pairs of heritage made Goodyear welted boots if that’s what you mean. Blundstones are still my go to for the reasons I stated above.
Plumber here. I wear Blundstones practically every day. Solid boots. Very, very tough. I put them through a great deal of torture and they hold up just as good as any Danner or Thorogood.
Good to know my friend
Nice!
I skipped blundstones and went for redbacks. They survived a phosphorus chemical spill and 6 months continued work with chemicals, 5 arborist work, and were submerged in a river clearing out brush before funky needing to be replaced. Still made in AU unlike blundstone.
The Blundstones and the Redbacks will also suffer from hydrolysis of the mid and outsoles because of the TPU and PU materials. Any footwear with these polyurethanes must be worn on a regular basis to not have the soles disintegrate.
For all the reasons you mentioned, i love my Jim Greens. I'll add they are advertised as, and actually made in South Africa (unlike Bluestone's "Tazmania" logo even though theyre made in China/Vietnam). I'll also add that the company Jim Green does great wildlife conservation work and treats their workers very well compared to other boot manufacturers.
They certainly lack the foamy comfort of my old Blundstones, but make up for it with a more rugged, resolable, outsile and wider toe box.
I've worn Thursday, Red Wing, RM William and many more - and none of them could ever touch the comfort of my Blundstones. And some of the things you say are simply not true. Blundstone indeed uses full grain leather and the claim that they would leak right away is pretty funny as I've never had any leather boot that are more waterproof than Blundstone. They held up astoundingly well for years and years (not month). And you can just put in any insole to make it "your" boot and most comfortable this side of your favorite slippers. To me, in the real world, they're worth more the money than pretty much any other boot.
Never heard of the Jim Green brand before! I actually love that big toe box. I need to look into them. Seems like a great value.
There is no cork and leather midsole idk why he would say that?? Its just a thick synethic board material then the insole
I have their African ranger boots, I'm surprised you haven't heard of them before, they probably have the best boots on the market in the $200 dollar price range with most being less than 200, they're all pretty wide which some won't like but is probably nicer on your feet, especially wider feet
Most comfy boot I’ve worn!
You lost me when you said doc martins are on par with blundstones
Same. I had both dr martens and blundstones, dr martens are crushed by blundstone in terms of leather quality and comfort.
This guy doesnt know what hes talking about
Agreed. Also no mention of the shanks and which boots have them or not.
You're kidding right? Not saying they're the best thing out there, but Doc construction is extremely legit. And material quality is high. Doc and BS are apples and oranges.
@@chadgraber4575 nah mate, Doc's quality is on par with some 100$ market shoes. One stitch breaks and they fall apart, and they don't have a shank. It's not high quality, it's blatantly bad mostly plasticy garbage made cheaply.
Thanks for this video. I’d just ordered the Blundstones when I saw your video. So I ordered the Thursdays to be able to compare the two. Side by side, the Thursdays are dramatically higher quality. It’s just clear. I first thought, do I want to wear the Thursdays in the mud walking the dog? Then I realized the Blundstones were more expensive, so why would it be better to risk damaging them instead of the less expensive Thursdays?
I’m not an expert but I’ve worn shoes many decades. A cheap shoe has a look and a fit. If they actually are cheap, then they’re fine for work because they’re easily replaced when they’re soon scuffed and ruined. An expensive cheap shoe gives up this advantage.
In terms of style who is to answer? But I felt the more “tailored” construction of the Thursday boot was more to my taste. I thought the Blundstones were sloppy looking. You could say more of a farmyard look. Absolutely valid. I’ve often bought for look instead of quality.
In my opinion the Blundstones are made only as good as they need to be. Fine. But then cut some of the savings back to the consumer, why dontcha? You won’t? Then ok, I’ll buy a better boot, better materials, better construction, better style (to me) for less money.
Boot Spy, thanks again. You did your viewers a solid.
Not that I care about famous people, but there is a reason famous people wear Blundsrone and not these other boots, you’ll see it in the paparazzi pictures, they are super casual and comfortable and you can rock them with anything, none of these other boots look cool tbh, there is just something missing.
I am not buying your review, all you say is you *think* blundstone will wear off or you *think* water will leak without any solid evidence. While lots of other reviewer or people are saying its stay solid for 4 or 5 years from their experience.
Don't put your personal gut feeling on review, we are looking for practical advice not someone else's feeling.
I love that you use the Red Wing for messy work. To each their own but I hate when ppl try to pass heritage boots off as dress boots.
There’s something beautiful about a beat up old boot
Pisses me off! I have seen folks babysitting their iron rangers like come on?
@@fron645 IKR, No casual or heritage boot needs to be treated w/ kid gloves like dress shoes. IR’s don’t look good until after about a 1-3 yrs of regular wear and upkeep. Don’t worry about scuffs embrace them.
@@pattgsm Completely agree! I love how mines have aged
union tradesman here. RW Heritage are jeans and blazer material. No protective cap = date night
Man I’ve been wearing 500s forever. Soles never have problems.. they last for over 5 years. And they look better than any other boot.
I wish redback would make a boot for is in cold climates like Canada. Just 200g of thinsulate in my other work boots makes a world of a difference on winter days
I want a quality Chelsea boot but having trouble getting the right fit, at least with Blundstone. I’m a size 11 shoe but that’s too big on the Blunnnie. Tried 10.5 and 10 but It’s hard to get the ankle, toes and sides all working together. Not concerned with the top because that will break on. The redback fit was better but not a stylish. Is it a matter of getting the right insert? I don’t want the fit to be dependent on sock thickness.
Just bought the Thursday Legends based on this review. They are on sale in Canada - can't wait to see what they are like...
It's super interesting to see the difference in price point internationally (maybe from being shipped over?). I've mostly seen them for $150-$250AUD depending on its the official website or a store, while Timberlands and Doc Martens are closer to $300 AUD and before shipping, Thursdays start at $300. Good year welts and full grain leathers more often start at twice Blundstone's local price point; at least in Australia, its more like a $100-$120 USD boot than a $200 USD one because it IS one.
I've owned a pair of Blunnies for about 3 years now and I won't get another pair. They're okay boots and a step up from Doc Martens but the surface level dye on the leather really bothers me. They're comfortable enough I guess but the inserts are useless and have to be replaced often.
I'm sure they were much better in the beginning but they're just another trend boot.
The Thursday boots are the best .
great video, what's your tought on the Georgia Boot Men's Georgia Giant High Romeo GR500 Work Boot?
Where would you get "cooler material", BootSpy? Do you have a bunch of spare coolers laying around your house? Like someone who would review coolers or something. So many questions...
Nice to see the Red Wings are getting some love.
You're killing it in that shirt, by the way.
Do you know how fast foam soles in boots like Blundstone or Redback break down if they are stored? Mine have been in the closet since winter.
I'd love to try Thursday boots but sadly they don't have official stores in the UK and ordering through distributors can be very expensive if the size and fit isn't to your liking. I contacted Thursday to ask when they plan on opening stores here or having a UK based webshop and they don't have plans at the moment. Our American friends will have to enjoy these lovely boots a little longer on their own :(
The Blundstone just looks better than all the rest from every use. Work, pub to dinner.
I wish I could love the Thursday Legends, but they don't make a size that fits my feet - their toe is wildly narrow.
You are mistaken about Jim green being leather midsole. It has a fabricated board material. Having said that, they are a rough boot and a superior value. Great leather,tough outsole, leather lined, you can't beat them. And I don' t agree that wider toes are less attractive. A different look. Honest, rugged, reliable boot. Jim greens are awesome.
You forgot another brand that is also superior. Wesco. They make a Romeo,they are absolutely top shelf in
I really wanna know which is the most comfortable for standing for long periods of time. Cuz I have blundstones, and I swear by their comfiness. I was thinking of getting the redbacks just cuz I hear they're even more comfortable (Rose Anvil). I'd love to get the Thursdays, but they don't seem that comfortable for standing for long periods of time
So I've had my redbacks for a solid year (After watching rose anvil too)
doing maintenance and going up and down stairs at least 8 hrs a day. I've never complained about putting my boots on the next morning. Make sure you pay attention to the sizing. I am a U.S. size 10 and I got a size 9 AU. If I needed a wide size then I would have gotten a 9.5 AU. Also I got the upgraded leather insole which helped me tons. Definitely will buy more redbacks
When I had blind stones I worked in a store where i had to stand all day plus walk all over the store. I walked 10km plus per day. I had the blind stones for 2 years and now I’m wearing the red backs. I have to say I prefer the red backs. Way more comfortable, the leather is more durable and price is insanely cheap.
its funny how almost every comment is saying blundstones are amazing, its clear that the video creator is payed off by Thursday boots lol
Love my blundstones. My first pair lasted for 7-8 years before the soles fell apart. No issues with water coming through the seams.
Red Wing made a Romeo boot but the discontinued it it was part of the King Toe series it was model “3510” was available in “EE” and “H” widths it was 👍
Hi @bootspy,
although I’ve loved my Blundstones for almost two years, I got annoyed by them because their soles are literally melting very soon if you’re near a pitfire.
Happened to me twice already and it’s not that I’ve jumped in the ashes if you know what I mean.
Do you know, if the soles of any of the mentioned boots would make a difference in that regard?
Would be very helpful to know. Thank you!
The blundstone 585 is a great lightweight boot with amazing comfort. That thursday boot looks weird man. Blundstone has become a more fashion icon, and so they’re in the position to charge a little more. And seriously, you can’t measure ‘best’. It’s all about taste.
Thanks for the information. It was very useful. I have a pair of Blundstone's and the sole exploded after not wearing them during the pandemic year and a half. I don't understand why they don't just use Goodyear welted soles to begin with. I have 15-year old boots with Goodyear and Vibram soles that haven't had this problem. The Blunnie's also have a scratch that I could not fix. Blundstone's seem to be way overpriced to me. I'll never buy another pair unless they fix their sole 'hydrolysis' problem, which was not mentioned here. I guess you've not experienced that issue...
Thursdays are the boot version of Sketchers. Get a pair of Redbacks.
I own a pair of Blundstone #663 which I believe are only available in Australia and while they don't seem to have a good year welt, for $120-$130AUD (~$80-$85USD) shipped they seem like good value to me especially since they use full grain leather as opposed to the "premium leather" used in their 500/550/600 models.
#659 model is the brown leather whereas the #663 is the black leather. The RRP is $154AUD (~$103USD) but they're always available cheaper at various outlets.
I’m in the market for a chelsea boot more on the rugged/casual side. I was pretty much set on the Legend, but Beckett Simonon’s new Silva boot is starting to catch my eye. Any idea on how the 2 compare? I have 3 pairs of Thursdays, so I know what I would be getting with the Legend, but i have not had any experience with Beckett Simonon. I do like how the Silva has a bit of a rounder toe, almost like a Redwing chelsea with a lugged sole. Also, I wear more slim straight jeans, nothing too tapered. Not sure if this will make the sleeker Legend look a little funny since almost all the reviewers I’ve seen review the Legend wear very tapered jeans. Any input would be appreciated
those thursday boots look like something noel fielding would wear or the man from the seventies milk tray ad sorry!
brother. you simply cannot be talking about "slimmer" or "more stylish" when that is exactly the opposite of what I want when I choose to wear chelsea work boots. since I actually half care about my foot health and toe posture, no I am not going to squeeze my foot into a tiny toebox because it is "stylish". I think blundstones have a good balance of aesthetics and comfortability, a more exaggerated version of this would be the jim green stockmans with a massive toe box.
Another informative video. I always learn something from watching your channel. Thanks..
I like my Danner Chelsea at $230 or $170 on Black Friday. These are like slippers, if not the most work oriented..
Price no object Nicks recently introduced a series of Chelseas, typical for Nicks they are tank like.
How well does it keep your feet warm? for winters?
Hey man, love the videos. very clear, high quality content. Really appreciate all the on foot shots. Subscribed. Could I please ask about a size question. I wear the timberland earth keepers in 10.5 regular and I’m hoping to upgrade to grant stone brass boot after watching your vid. What size would you recommend? Also your styling is awesome and the time stamps and attention to details of your reviews are incredibly thoughtful
I would try the 10.5d for the brass too (assuming you wear 11 in sneakers). It's been a while since I wore the earth keepers, but I remember them fitting pretty large
@@BootSpy perfect Thankyou man really appreciate this, would you also recommend the same size for the iron ranger? I normally wear 11 with the Air Force1 and 9.5uk-G with the rm Williams
Yeah, I also wear a 10d in iron rangers, so same size
Sorry, to clarify: my iron rangers and brass boots are the same size
@@BootSpy cheers:) if you had to pick between the iron rangers and the grant stone diesel boot/ maybe the Ottawa which would win. could be good vs video?
whats with the ariat groundbreaker chelsea boots?
Blundstones are made in Thailand and Vietnam, Redbacks are 100% Australian made.
good review but I can't find Redback or Jim Green in any stores within 200 miles . I can only find them on line and no one has my size....oh well
Would just like to suggest checking out Solovair’s Dealer Boot as an alternative.
-Good year welted
-a few different leather, safety and elastic band options.
-made in england
-better than docs imo
Great rec!
@@BootSpy Great vid!
Totally agree on Solovair. I am wildly impressed by my Dealer and Astronaut boots. And my Redbacks are wonderfully comfortable. Both brands are better than their more popular rivals. The only drawback is neither have stores in the US, so you are taking a chance with mail ordering.
I had 2 pairs of solovairs. 2 minor drawbacks: they are right, so not good for people with wide feet and I find that the sole degrades faster than boots usually do. It’s great that it can easily be resoled but if I have to resole it every year then I don’t feel like I’m buying quality material.
Hey sorry to bother you again, but can i ask about your fit with RM Williams? i got mine in a 9.5G and grant stone recommended size 10D on the leo last. how was your fit with rm in a 9G ? again very sorry to bother you with this
No worries! My fit with the 9G is a little snug. I thought it would stretch more than it has, so if I was going to go back again, I'd get the 9.5G.
Are you using the 500s(originals) or 550s(classics) because this sounds like the 500(originals). The 550s(classics) are much better than 500(originals). Make sure you’re doing a fair review for the viewers.
Loving your videos Bootsoy I truely understand neither boot is perfect but, it's a dandy of a video. Plz reply.
Thank you for watching and commenting, I really appreciate it!
I have the jim green and you can remove the leather and plastic insole.
Does he talk about Johnston Murphy?
A lot of people seem to be getting their Blundstones re-soled and extending their lives for years.
The bottom line is there’s only one Bloody
Yeah, now that they're made in China, the leather is cheaper, and double what they used to cost, definitely a gouge. But, they still work better than all just due to the design, fashion aside, which is what you seem to prioritize. They were designed to be an all day comfort work and kick around boot, and still suit the bill. Mine go from warehouse, boat captaining, riding motorcycles, and the bar or dinner all without taking them off. That thursday boot would fall apart in a second in the real world.
Totally missed the point blundstone is a work boot, such and such is better cos it's more stylish 😆 comical. Aussie workboots are awesome but I prefer redbacks and mongrel personally due to blunnies being too pricey for what you get, redbacks have a full 3mm leather for less money . Jim green are known as a goodboot, doc martens are dirt. And as for leaking I've never ever had a pair of any Aussie boot leak. In Ireland these elastic side workboots are called a dealer boot, Chelsea boots are the same elastic side boot but are the poncey "stylish" dress boot 😂 where boys are concerned with how they look as opposed to how they work
UGG makes a great alternative as well. Real comfortable.....
i love my red backs. i have brown ones with steel toe
I need to try Redback
NONE of these boots cater to women’s sizes :( would’ve bought the Jim green ones. (Okay well the Thursdays do but I’m looking for outdoor boots) that’s why blind stones are so popular IMO
You forgot about the redwing and Thursday boots are resoleable
in my opinion, the Thursday Legend is way too dressy. Not why I bought my Blunts.. I use em for every day work
Dude. Blundstones are work boots. Stop trying to compare them to fancy boots.
and I don't "customise" my work boots with paint splashes!!
Redacks are not more comfortable than Blundstones. And all my Blundstones have lasted a minimum of 5 years using them at the construction site and wearing them in the garden. They get wet regularly and I have not experienced the issues you claim with the water in the sole.
Different boots. I prefer Mongrol as they're Aussie made but these are a workmboot not a fashion boot
Dawg, they are called Chelsey boots. All of them.
Blundstone boots are the best!
i liked everything said about the Thursday so i went to the site. oops, seems no wide options. so why would i even consider them, no matter the quality difference? also, i'm no blundstone fanboy, but it matters when you can walk into a store, try on a pair and walk out with the shoes and box in hand.
Where's Birkenstock?
Blundstones for me.
I wish they build it non metal alternatives.
Blundstones are awesome. Sorry.
Nah they are not
Nah, they blew it. Sold out to asia. Only hipsters wear them in Australia. we still have redback and mongrel 100% Aus made
@@arynvidsa the problem with Redbacks is they look like safety boots with the horrible clear soles and air cushion cells. I don’t doubt they are great boots in regards to durability and comfort, but Blundstone’s look a lot more stylish and this is perhaps why they are so popular outside of Australia also. The 585’s I’ve had since January still look brand new and I’ve worn them nearly everyday for 8 months. So durable and comfortable and they put to bed the myth Asian QC is inferior to the rest of the World.
Based on nothing
@@arynvidsaI don't even see hipsters wearing them anymore. I always preferred Rossi but now there in Indonesia I'm going Redback.
Vegan leather is PU leather
God!!!... The boot internet is getting annoyingly populated by Thursday sponsored crap!!...... The answer to every bloody thing is a "Thursday" boot....
Exactly
Blundstone top
Have to agree about the Blundstones....they used to be the gold standard here in Australia and were made about 100 kms from where I live.....then they obviously got greedy and decided to get them made off shore to maximize their profits. In doing doing so minimized their quality and also their fit. They used to be comfortable right from new but now are no where near that in any of their boots. Was a sad day when they did this. I bet they regret their decision now in this day and age where home grown products are what everyone wants...not overseas junk.
Changing the subject...what would you recommend as the best value hiking/jungle boot that's super durable, comfortable and not too heavy. I do a lot of bush walking through fairly rugged terrain and clear the walking tracks from time to time. Have been using steel blue work boots for some time but their comfort after a few hours leaves a bit to be desired. Cheers!
I like the velasca resegott as a rugged hiking boot that will basically last forever. Thanks for watching!
@@BootSpy Thanks for that! Greatly appreciated!
Vegan leather? Can anybody think of a better oxymoron than that?
Thursday boots are some of the most uncomfortable boots I’ve ever worn
Vegan leather: from vegetarian cows?
I'll stick with the legend
Booya!
I love my rock roosters they are as good as all of these
You reviewed the 550's, but you compare everything to the budget 500's. Funny
But it’s not polishable
If you're reading this, don't let this guy's biased review fool you. Just because he personally doesn't like Blundstones, doesn't mean that they aren't incredibly comfortable, durable, and versatile boots. Get a pair for yourself and you'll see what I mean.
It’s true that my review is biased: I’ve tried over 100 pairs of boots in the years since running this channel. And when I tried Blundstones and looked at the materials inside, they weren’t nearly as good as many other options out there that you can get for much cheaper. So in that way, yes, I’m biased against blundstone because they’re objectively not as well built, versatile, or comfortable as other boots you can find for the same price.
You clearly missed the point of Blundies from the getgo my dude, they’re a cheap as shit, tradies boot, designed to be worn hard and beat to shit, but comfortable enough to get through the day. It’s designed to be cheap, beaten up and replaced.
Or you could spend a little more and have something that lasts 4x longer. You can buy good boots and still beat them up. But you won't need to throw them away...you can just keep wearing them.
Blundstones are not cheap in America.
Redbacks.
🧐 No body in Australia or New Zealand has wide feet ??? If you have “EEE” or “H” aka “EEEE” your out of Luck
At last!
Thursday legends look shite though
Please consider Blundstones vegan shoes. They put alot of care into making these including the thread. The sole is very breathable and the shoes look as good as the original. They don't have a synthetic look or feel and are very durable.
Redwing soles are trash.
Blundstone are vegan! They are not genuine leather!
I believe there are vegan blundstones, but these boots are definitely made with leather
@@BootSpy ahhh sorry, my bad, you are right. They have done a collaboration with Finisterre, which is the vegan version. I thought Blunderstone was just the model name
I’m a straight man not a trans man so I’ll pass on the Thursdays 😂you have made not one case against the blundstone , they look better and are more comfortable… what’s your problem dude😂🤷🏼♂️
I am not really a boot guy as I normally wear minimalist sneekers, or oxfords. Not Derby’s or a Bluchers because why? And never split-toes. I wouldn’t purchase any boot that had a square toe or bulbous toe shape like crocks. Those Blundstones have those shapes. Ugly and dated. They may be good boots, but to me they resemble clown shoes. People buy crocks so there appears to still be a market for the style. They are just not for me.
Those Thursdays are ugly and would be the laughing stock at any construction site.