Apple Vision Pro vs. Meta Quest 3: Zuckerberg was wrong!
Vložit
- čas přidán 16. 02. 2024
- In this video we’ll walk you through:
- Meta Quest 3 vs Apple Vision Pro comparison
ABOUT OUR CHANNEL
Our channel is about all things tech. We cover lots of cool stuff such as the newest gaming consoles, phones and gadgets.
Check out our channel here:
/ @techconsultant1
Don’t forget to subscribe!
/ @techconsultant1
CHECK OUT OUR OTHER VIDEOS
• Going Retro: The Best ...
GET IN TOUCH
Contact us on thecomputerconsultant9098@gmail.com
Disclaimers:
We may receive a small commission if I advocate, recommend, or link to any products or services from this CZcams channel and its videos.
Some of the footage obtained is not original content created by The Tech Consultant. Product stock footage was gathered from a variety of sources, including manufacturers, fellow creators, and numerous other sources for visual reference solely. This video's thoughts and opinions are unique to The Tech Consultant channel. If you have a problem with the content or something that belongs to you and would like it deleted, please contact us at thecomputerconsultant9098@gmail.com - Věda a technologie
These AI voices are getting too good.
What I'm getting from this is that the Quest 3 has more functional advantages where usability is concerned, while the Apple Vision Pro has better resolution. I would hope there's more to the "future of spacial computing" than just pumping up the pixel density and contrast. XR is not just a visual platform and if the controls aren't versatile enough to handle the functions we expect, that's not a step forward. Limiting yourself to gesture controls and eye tracking is already a step backwards from the functionality of modern PCs and tablets which handle basic input better and offer more options for more complex tasks. Something as simple as typing requires a separate keyboard to even be passably functional with the Apple Vision Pro. Using eye or hand tracking to type is severely less practical. You run into the same problem with art and design applications, where people in those fields want functionality. A streamlined control method doesn't necessarily offer a better experience, particularly where productivity is concerned. And that's not even getting into how the vast majority of XR games simply wouldn't work on the Vision Pro. They depend on input methods the Vision Pro simply can't replicate.
Have you used the VP yet? The gestures and eye tracking are incredible. No other headset can compare in that regard, as well as latency which is the best of any other headset and it's not even close. And of course if you need to do serious typing of course you need to use a physical keyboard. You can also use any bluetooth device that's compatible with iPhone.
@@white.lodge.dale.cooper Having a better version of an inferior and more limiting input method isn't really a step up, especially when you completely eliminate the more responsive, accurate, and versatile input method in the process.
What input method is being eliminated? You can use a physical keyboard, voice, and the eye tracking on the virtual keyboard is surprisingly good. Not as effective as a real keyboard of course. @@adseigo
@@white.lodge.dale.cooper Motion tracked controllers. They're more precise and responsive than hand tracking and offer more functionality through the use of buttons, triggers, and touch controls. Most of your games, plus things like art and modeling apps, are designed with those in mind. Hand tracking simply isn't good for those applications. Eye tracking as a control method simply isn't practical for 99% of uses since in most cases you don't want to have to redirect your attention every time you need to make a selection or input. The most popular games on other platforms are simply not possible with the AVP and won't be because of the limiting factors of their chosen input methods. Something as simple as Beat Saber is impossible on the system. You can't reliably or intuitively simulate pressure or tilt in art programs. You have no haptic feedback to help with context or positioning. And controllers are starting to employ other sensors to keep track of their positioning when they leave the FOV of the camera setup, not to mention emitting their own IR light to function in low light, things your physical hands can't do. That's why I say the AVP is a step backwards in functionality. Improving on an input method that is inherently more limited and less functional than the standard while removing the option of the better, more versatile method altogether, is not a step forward.
I'll ask again; have you used AVP yet? If you haven't, we can't really have a debate. And, it was just released a few weeks ago; you don't think motion controllers will be introduced at some point? You know how Apple is; they famously eschewed the stylus when introducing the iPhone, and then 99% of smartphones followed suit not outright shamelessly copied them. AVP is a giant step forward, and it's an adventurous, exciting, ground-breaking, innovative gamble and I love that. They will surely address input method options after people have used it for a while. I just appreciate how Apple threw it out there to see what people will do with it. The best is yet to come. @@adseigo
Synth Rider is on the Quest 3 and PSVR2 and the best games coming to the Apple Vision Pro are Job Similar and Vacation Similator and the Vision Pro is not 7x the power of the Quest 3 so it should not cost 7x the price and I already bought 2 headsets last year lool so I'll miss out on this headset as its just a Quest 3 with little to no gaming and is only 10% better in terms of specs and it doesn't have a headphone jack and for me that's important as I use my Quest 3 as a live instrument or a full VR studio sometimes when I am recordings in my music studio and for the audio to go back into the soundcard a headphone jack is key in achieving that
10% better? That's waaay too low. Each display in AVP is ~4K; it has 8 million pixels whereas Meta only has 3.7 million.. Latency is 2x faster than the Meta and pretty much eliminates lag-induced nausea. Meta can't track your fingers when they're in your lap like AVP. AVP pass through masking on your hands doesn't warp like Meta's does. The only thing Meta does better right now is gaming.
No, beater stuff is still to arise juggalos
If you want vr for gaming then its the psvr2 or pcvr quest 3 is good as well at gaming but not as good as those? And if you want a computing style vr experience it looks like apple have that title now too ,yeah sure the quest can do stuff the apple can but let's face it it's not as good? ......having said that I would have the quest over the apple as the price of that is just an outright insult to the world of vr and it's not that much better by the look of it?......but I don't see why the comparison is just the quest as it actually doesnt do gaming or computing as good as the already counter parts? , but value for money you cant fault it and although I'm sounding like a hater I'm not? In fact I am going to buy one myself as a second vr headset for when I'm away ,but I have played them already and despite what people say for gaming they are not as good as the psvr2 ,but I guess it's what you want it for?
.. payd..
Q3 the best ❤❤❤🎉🎉
2 expensive most reduce price
Have you read the specs? The tech, number of cameras and sensors, custom chips, etc, is insane; that's why it's so expensive.
They have one coming that will be priced a little more competitively, They just released their main one first, for obvious reasons.
If it’s that good why are people
Returning them
Many people bought them so they could make videos for upvotes, then they returned them. The vast majority of AVP buyers kept them. It's a non-issue.