George Jefferies Lost JFK Footage NBC News 2007

Dallas resident George Jefferies filmed JFK's motorcade on Main street about 90 seconds before the assassination. He kept the footage private for decades until giving it to the 6th Floor museum. This is NBC news with Brian Williams reporting on that event on President's Day.

[@user-cz8wp7bl6i]

Something wrong there as the security was not riding on the bumper as per usual . It’s fake.

[@lutello3012]

Can't save that CES video to watch later because it's marked for kids 🙄🙄🙄

[@oracleshawty3192]

what happened to bosom buddy bloopers?

[@jimallen19]

shows his coat bunched up in back, which made shot appear to be lower.

[@rogerscottcathey]

Ridiculous. They know exactly where the bullet was with respect to the thoracic vertebrae. No where near the cervical vertebrae. The shirt was tucked in. The jacket could rise, not the shirt. Even so, the jacket hole is five to six or so inches down. Get real

[@jetcat132]

@@rogerscottcatheyAnd the proof is what?
Show us bullets and fragments of all of the shots and shooters….
And don’t say they were collected and destroyed, altered or tampered with. That requires proof.

[@rogerscottcathey]

@@jetcat132 : Trying to change the subject? Everything is questionable and proof in that case cuts two ways. The point I made is that the bullet hole in his back doesn't allow a tangent for exit out the location of the neck wound . . . which all the Parkland doctors and others who saw it called an entrance wound.

[@jetcat132]

@@rogerscottcathey Sorry, I call bullshit.
The Parkland doctors NEVER SAW THE ENTRY WOUND at the 6th cervical vertebra, because they never, at any time turned Kennedy over. Ever.
They assumed the throat wound was one of entry because they never saw his back. And they didn’t have time to inspect the wounds, they were trying in vain to keep him alive. At the press conference they were speculating about the wounds, and couldn’t agree. And after seeing the autopsy photos, almost all of the doctors had no issue with them.
And let’s not forget the seating arrangement that the CT crowd loves to ignore. It lines up the trajectory of the second shot perfectly for CE399 to do exactly what it did.
You cannot discount the jacket being bunched up because, well, you weren’t there. And yes, the shirt could easily have been untucked as well. Easily. You can’t say it was or wasn’t with any conviction.
Now let’s get back to it….Go ahead, throw out everything I just said in rebuttal to you. I never changed the subject just so you wouldn’t get mad….I answered you.
Now for the sake of your argument, throw it all out. The single bullet didn’t happen, forget everything I said.
But now I get to repeat MY earlier question. If Oswald couldn’t or didn’t make the shots, where the f*** are the other bullets and fragments that wounded Connally? What happened to the bullet that you claim hit Kennedy lower in the back? Where are they? According to the CTers, there had to be more shots. How do you account for them? What about the Kennedy head shot? Where did it come from? Where are the fragments of the bullet or bullets?
I’m not changing the subject, it IS the subject. You cannot talk about the shots unless you account for the bullets and fragments. You haven’t, at least not yet.
I know what happened to Oswald’s second shot bullet that hit Kennedy, and went through Connally. I know what happened to Oswald’s third shot bullet that hit Kennedy in the back of the head. And do you know why? Because it’s real evidence, hard, physical evidence, not theory. That is my proof, and it doesn’t cut both ways.
But I have yet to hear a peep from a CTer about where the bullets and fragments came from and went. Especially if claimed it was a second shooter or shooters other than Oswald from the TSBD.
And remember, all bullets and fragments ever recovered were matched to Oswald’s Carcano to the exclusion of every other weapon. You find a bullet or fragment from another weapon, and by definition you have a conspiracy.
But without that proof, it’s all just a fantasy.

[@LVVMCMLV]

ancient history now...

[@keb107]

So what’s your point?

[@peterfranks6243]

@@keb107 THAT'S the kind of ignorance you'll expect from younger generations

[@choosetolivefree]

It actually isn't ancient history at all. In 1992, because of the movie "JFK", Bush Sr. passed the JFK Records Act, which said that all government documents should be released to the public... by 2017 LOL. He gave them 25 years to do whatever before they had to release their documents in the assassination. Well, 2017 came, and Trump went ahead and kept a huge chunk of files still hidden from the public, "until 2021". Yea, right.
As you can see, it is far from ancient history. A lot of people are still trying to get to the truth of the matter. Because sure as shit it wasn't Oswald

[@kiaandavids755]

@@choosetolivefree so you’re completely disputing the fact that oswald took any shots?

[@choosetolivefree]

@@kiaandavids755 Absolutely. There is no evidence Oswald fired anything at all that day. In fact, the only indications that Oswald ever owned a rifle at all was his wife Marina, who was known to the Warren Commission as a liar. She lied about many things. Other than Marina's dishonest word, there is not a shred of evidence that Oswald ever owned a rifle at all. If I am wrong, prove it