FRM: How d2 in Black-Scholes becomes PD in Merton model

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 5. 09. 2024

Komentáře • 45

  • @investwithvincent6329
    @investwithvincent6329 Před 2 lety

    It's the first time I'm seeing the normal bell curve on a line. Intuitively, it makes a lot of sense. Life just got more clear for me. Thanks

  • @Arnofski
    @Arnofski Před 11 lety

    You're a god - I was listening 3 hours to my professor talking about this subject, listening to you, the same effect was reached within 10 minutes. Thanks!

  • @shrivti1
    @shrivti1 Před 15 lety

    to medici 101: for an explanation of d1 learn how to find delta.
    I am so impressed by this video. You managed to make intuitively understandable in 10 minutes a concept I didn't grasp through my whole time at b-school. Thanks!

  • @VenVig
    @VenVig Před 13 lety

    wow...what a clear explanation.. Mr.Harper, you are awesome.
    I am learning finance on my own; have watched Paul Wilmott's lectures in you tube, Horward lectures.. but nothing is as clear, concise and understandable as your short 10 min videos.. thanks a lot

  • @wuxiayang7714
    @wuxiayang7714 Před 5 lety +2

    Really nice explanation, all clear after the 10 minutes! - Thanks so much!

    • @bionicturtle
      @bionicturtle  Před 5 lety

      Thank you for watching! We are very happy to hear that our video was so helpful.

  • @ming2712
    @ming2712 Před 4 lety +1

    Omg! this makes so much sense, thank you so much for keeping it straightfoward and simple to understand:))))

  • @bionicturtle
    @bionicturtle  Před 12 lety

    @KoalaBearWarrior Like Black Scholes, the rates are all expressed in continuous frequency. At T0, LN(130/100) ~ 26%. At T1, LN(134/100) ~= 29.2. To use 0.74*130, is to use discrete: 134/100 - 1 = 34%. FWIW, they reconcile with R(c) = k*LN(1+R(k)/k). In this case, case R(c) = 1*LN(1 + 34%) = 29.2%

  • @johnnieiphone4882
    @johnnieiphone4882 Před 4 lety

    I am seeing this in 2020. Still useful

  • @zero_sugar_
    @zero_sugar_ Před 8 lety +1

    omg i just read the written version of this lol!! can't believe ur the same guy! THNK YOU SO MUCH

    • @bionicturtle
      @bionicturtle  Před 8 lety +1

      +Kuan-In Liao You're welcome! We are glad that our video was helpful!

    • @zero_sugar_
      @zero_sugar_ Před 8 lety

      +Bionic Turtle Please sir! help me with this! i don't know how to solve for the σV...
      "Consider a company whose equity is 3 million euros. The volatility of equity is 0.80. The company’s debt is equal to 10 million euros and it must be paid in one year. The risk-free rate on the market is 5%
      per annum."
      Question 1: What are the values of Vo and σV?
      Question 2: What is the probability of default of the company in one year?

  • @euastus
    @euastus Před 14 lety

    i wish i can find a video explaining d1 as well ... this video was really good ... cheers

  • @peters972
    @peters972 Před 2 lety

    It looks like an ancient bow and arrow, which is also cool.

  • @VenVig
    @VenVig Před 13 lety

    and really irritated with a few comments over here..guys..we are getting such valuable education in youtube for free (thanks Mr.Harper).. we cannot be complaining
    Mr.Harper's videos are supplements; we should not expect him to teach everything over here.

  • @Donderi
    @Donderi Před 10 lety +2

    Excellent explanation - thank you.

  • @investwithvincent6329
    @investwithvincent6329 Před 2 lety

    7:00
    Why did we need to add a negative sign to d2 despite that we are looking at the right side of the bell curve?

  • @lucaReis01
    @lucaReis01 Před 3 lety

    Best explanation so far! thank you :D

  • @ammadurrahman5321
    @ammadurrahman5321 Před rokem

    aWESOME PRESENTAION..THANKSS

  • @plazmafield
    @plazmafield Před 4 lety

    This was an incredible video, thank you so much

  • @Saywhatohno
    @Saywhatohno Před 4 lety

    how would you predict the 5%? is there a matrix or external research that can predict the 5% based on industry types?

  • @KoalaBearWarrior
    @KoalaBearWarrior Před 12 lety

    at 4:00 you say the firm would have to drop by 26% before default. 0.74*130 = < 100 though, so I don't see why it should not bee a lot less than 26%

  • @stephanies4267
    @stephanies4267 Před 7 lety +1

    keep up the good work ! Thank you for sharing :)

    • @bionicturtle
      @bionicturtle  Před 7 lety

      You're welcome! Thank you for watching! :)

  • @deyiyu1002
    @deyiyu1002 Před 5 lety

    Is it should be d1? I saw in some formula, the second term in the numerator is u+sigma^2/2)*T, why? Thanks

  • @bumblebee1993991
    @bumblebee1993991 Před 9 lety

    I failed to find anywhere else apart from this video that risk free rate in BS model corresponds to the expected return in Merton model. Each paper I have encountered used the risk-free rate, not the asset growth (mu)
    Can someone please clear this out for me
    Thanks in advance

  • @nidhibharani1886
    @nidhibharani1886 Před 8 lety

    Hello sir, thanks a lot for this video. Really helpful. Can you please briefly write here how the volatility is factored in the form of GEOMETRIC MEAN? I am really curious to understand.

  • @hannahrobinson1378
    @hannahrobinson1378 Před 7 lety

    Hi there, how do you get the PD figure by using a calculator, not excel. What would N be . For example, on the calculator I would put in ?*(-1.462) = 7.19%. How do you know what the '?' figure would be
    Thanks

  • @sardorabdullaev1880
    @sardorabdullaev1880 Před 6 lety +1

    Hi David! Thanks for a great video. Can you tell me where I can find the explanation on how to determine the Firm Value, Volatility and the Expected Return?

    • @sardorabdullaev1880
      @sardorabdullaev1880 Před 6 lety

      www.bionicturtle.com/forum/threads/merton-model-a-summary-of-the-issues.5646/

    • @bionicturtle
      @bionicturtle  Před 6 lety

      I've always thought Peter Crosbie did a good job summarizing the calculations to which refer, here is copy of Modeling Default Risk by Crosbie (the KMV method is the same as Merton until the DD is retrieved, it varies after that): trtl.bz/2O9aECG

  • @marchesedesade89
    @marchesedesade89 Před 12 lety

    I was thinking about the relationship between time and distance to default. It looks like the bigger the maturity, the bigger the distance to default (ceteris paribus). Does it make sense to assume that? However, this works only if the second term in the numerator is positive, so the price grows more than half of the variance.
    Am I correct?

  • @an-pinhuang2845
    @an-pinhuang2845 Před 4 lety

    The d2 formula in BS is the risk-free rate under the risk-neutral measure. I am wondering why you are using mu which is the expected rate of return? Is there some difference of risk neutral probability and real world probability that I am missing here?

    • @bionicturtle
      @bionicturtle  Před 4 lety +1

      you are missing the entire point of the video, which is to compare d2 in BSM with distance to default (DD) in Merton model. Mathematically, Rf is BSM is replaced with mu in DD; the former is risk-neutral but the latter is a actual (future) distribution so it uses mu. Shallow mathematical difference but nontrivial difference between risk-neutral and "physical" distribution.

    • @an-pinhuang2845
      @an-pinhuang2845 Před 4 lety

      @@bionicturtle Thank you for replying! The comparison was clear to me, but I was unsure why BSM uses risk free rate but DD uses expected return. The latter part of the reply answered it, thanks again!

  • @zero_sugar_
    @zero_sugar_ Před 8 lety +1

    awesome thank you

  • @YesWeCanLove
    @YesWeCanLove Před 10 lety

    thanks! Very Usefull!

  • @konurajenday
    @konurajenday Před 11 lety

    How would the formula works while adding dividend yield into it?

  • @dominicj7977
    @dominicj7977 Před 6 lety +1

    is d2 the distance to default?

    • @bionicturtle
      @bionicturtle  Před 6 lety

      Hi Dominic, yes that is exactly correct! d2 is the distance to default. FWIW, it is the DD in returns(%) format and standardized (per the denominator) into a standard normal units. So it's a "normal returns" DD. It can be translated back/forth to the lognormal DD which is dollar-based. Like the BSM, the log returns are normal such that the values are lognormal. Thanks!

    • @dominicj7977
      @dominicj7977 Před 6 lety

      Hi. How can I contact you?. I may have some questions. I work in credit risk management but I don't know shit about finance because I graduated in Mechanical engineering

    • @bionicturtle
      @bionicturtle  Před 6 lety

      Hi Dominic you can reach me via our support forum at www.bionicturtle.com/forum (and my contact information is there). My email is davidh@bionicturtle.com. Thanks,

  • @hongruisun4648
    @hongruisun4648 Před 7 lety +1

    GOOD

  • @johnpalma7265
    @johnpalma7265 Před 7 lety

    What citizenship u r ? To what flag pledge allegiance?Get verified now for free before Trump make it mandatory and u having to pay fee.