GM Ben Finegold is Not A Hans Niemann Fan
Vložit
- čas přidán 1. 05. 2024
- Check out Ben's Chessable courses here! www.chessable.com/author/BenF... [09-20-2022] Highlight from the Gossip Stream
If you're interested in sponsoring a lecture of your choice, email Karen at karen@atlchessclub.com
Signup or gift a chess.com Premium membership to get access to their lessons, remove ads, improve your chess, AND help Ben at the same time!! Upgrade your chess.com membership or join! - go.chess.com/finegold.
Buy Merch today! ccscatlmerch.com/
Watch live at / gmbenjaminfinegold
Follow me on Twitter: / ben_finegold
#benfinegold #chess #magnuscarlsen #hansniemann - Hry
I laughed so much when ben said "IF I ACCUSE RUFUS AND DUFUS" and someone in chat says "why do you do that to rufous?"
Well, the only way rufous could succeed in chess is by cheating.
Timestamp?
like 8:00 thereabouts
Magnus finally said today that he will make a statement after the current Julius Baer Generation Cup tournament is over.
I’m guessing there won’t be very much substance in that statement, but I hope I’m wrong, for his sake.
He is a coward. Magnus will not say anything important like today. His only goal is to isolate Hans from the other chess players and fans because of his ego.
If he's afraid of saying something for the legal reasons - it's fine, but saying what is he afraid of and why doesn't he speak and why is he handling it this way has no possible legal reasons other than just being afraid
I mean, i don’t get this whole drama, yeah we know that hans cheated online in the past, regarding if it was 3 years ago or a couple of months ago (last time i mean) he didn’t cheat over the board at the sinquefield cup against magnus so i don’t get all this crying from magnus.
@@elias5658 for those of us who have followed chess for 20 years and not 20 minutes, Magnus has lost to young players thousands of times and never responded this way. Go watch Alireza kick his ass in rapid and bullet streams, watch the reactions and anger, then realize Magnus has mentored Alireza and loves and respects the kid. Same with Pragg.
After a few weeks Magnus comes out and says, "I'm not playing Hans because he stole my girlfriend. I never said Hans cheated in Chess."
Leave the guy alone
You’re being the most well based person on the topic since the beginning. And yes, you were speaking on Magnus behavior since the first week
Dude, I love this guy! I have the same opinions as him. I don’t like Hans because he embodies that whole “Arrogance of youth” idea. At the same time I don’t subscribe to ruining someones life / career over speculation and require some proof before grabbing my pitchfork.
Hans Niemann has admitted cheating.
The proof is his admission ffs. Previous is used in criminal convictions too.
@@arsenalfanrichi So the things you do when you were under 18 are used after?
@@arsenalfanrichi More to the point… you never did anything, really stupid, before you were 18? Or even after?
@@jasonxoc I did stupid stuff, of course, that is part of growing up. But I NEVER did anything I knew would hurt other people or was clearly immoral.
I think that this commentary from Ben perfectly explain why Magnus did what he did. Ben is saying that it is frown upon in the chess community to accuse someone of cheating, even if he is cheating. That even if you are sure that someone is cheating, to resign or to quit is worse. This is exactly the kind of mentality Magnus is against, like he said in an interview one year ago.
To find a cheater in chess is super difficult, like for doping. The only real way of contrasting it, like for doping, is to have harsh punishment if you get caught even once: you get caught? Lifetime ban. One free pass if you get caught as a minor.
Magnus never said that Hans cheated in the cup, in that match. He cannot prove it, and he has not accused Hans of that. However, what he knows is that Hans is a cheater. He cheated multiple times, and he admitted so. Everyone playing against him, will always have the doubt. Therefore, he should not be allowed to play. He got caught cheating many times? He should not be play competitive chess. The fact that in chess people still say that is bad manner to point at cheaters instead of denouncing it is the reason of Magnus action. We need for chess a movement similar to what happened in the '90s for doping: if you used doping, people should not feel bad about not wanting to compete with you.
Implying someone is a cheater is worse than calling someone a cheater because without an actual accusation there is no way to defend yourself. If you suspect someone of cheating there should be an investigation, but there can't be an investigation without an actual accusation. Hans may very well have cheated but Magnus isn't doing the chess world any favours by being vague and encouraging a witch hunt.
@@keldencowan you are wrong, hater. Magnus is doing a great thing for chess. Cheaters will think twice from now on.
Perfect!
i would agree but with an age restriction. like, if u have a history of cheating after age 18 or something... it would terrible to cancel potentially the next world champion for cheating online chess at age 16. cheating in online chess is the easiest , most readily available way to cheat out of all the major competitions.
I think a compromise would be something like if you cheated in online at any age, u must abide by stricter anti cheating measures or something.
@@humanbean3 In another comment I was saying the same. My idea is: first time caught cheating, lifetime ban. If you are a minor, you get one "one year ban" probation. If as a minor you cheat more than once, lifetime ban.
The case of Hans is peculiar. He cheated at 12, got caught. Cheated at 15-16, got caught. He confirmed those himself, so there is no doubt. After that, he claimed that he changed, but Chess com found him guilty of several more cheating cases, we do not know up to when, even in titled matches.
Magnus decided that it is enough not to play with him, one can think otherwise of course. But what is sure is that to prove that Hans cheated in the specific match against Magnus is not relevant, nor Magnus accused him otherwise -- he cannot know it as we cannot know it, but to lose in a suspicious match against a known cheater is something that should not happen in a game.
Very much appreciate your commentary on this Ben
i enjoyed that. i'll try to watch more of your vids in the future.
It's fun to get a quasi-inside scoop on all this. Love this dude.
This is why I love Ben. Uncompromising levels of honesty.
This is why we love Ben; he's cynical - but realistic.
@@sleepyjoe7241 I know this is bait but wtf
@@davidshatto7604 seethe ]
And vulgar, unfortunately. The kids will no longer be viewing this guy.
@@EzPz44 he’s a jew, what do you expect?
Well we all know if Hans did indeed cheat, then he’s one of the most talented cheaters out there
Yeah and there's legitimate chess skills backing him up, there's no way he's just some bozo like me over the board. This reminds me of world record holders and chasers in other sports/hobbies, to be the best even if you're cheating, you have to have some kind of foundation of skill and expertise. A total noob can't pull it off.
And the closer you are to winning legitimately the more likely you are to be willing to take that extra step of cheating to reach the finish line, if you are so inclined. The desire to win is powerful.
Some folks can't live with themselves if they know it's not legit, and that's sort of the only thing holding back other fierce competitors: it wouldn't be satisfying to win that way.
I've seen Hans playing out in streets like a GM but with no social skills. I don't think Hans got a chip up his ass telling him the moves.
I love Carlson's games, his personality, his support of young talented players, and his gentlemanship representing chess players' culture.
@@ahmadkoopal3120 you like how magnus quit in a tournament? Grow up
So, in your eyes, cheating itself has a rating? I would say Hans is 2500 in cheating. lol
@@wrench9103 Everyone has the right to quit a tournament because of ... whatever reason or not wanting to play against an opponent by resigning.
Wise beyond your years, and thats saying something! Cheers ben.
Totally agree with you, Sir
He didn't know until last second that Hans was playing in the tournament. At that point it was too late since he was already committed. Hans was a replacement player for that tournament.
I would argue that it is quite good for the sponsors, fans, streamers and CZcamsrs. It's fantastic content and also scratches much larger (and quite topical) existential questions.
As an impartial outsider who is not part of the chess community, this scandal is the only one I've been made aware of. This isn't just me, this drama has quite a bit of attention even from people outside of the community. If Magnus doesn't provide solid evidence that can be held up in the court of law, he'll have single handedly ruined the reputation of the game than anyone else in recent years.
There's a reason professionally run Rust servers don't let anyone with a game or vac ban play on their servers no matter how long ago the ban was. I was a Rust server admin. I can't speak to all games, but for that game, once a cheater always a cheater. Let a cheater on your server and they will find a way to cheat.
Yay Ben. At first I was all team Magnus but when I heard Ben I changed my mind. Naka overstepped.
Thought the Aronian game was suspicious as well. Plays Bd3 against the Siclian which is rare, ok but then he plays Be2 a couple of moves later, which was very unhumanlike. Then he also plays a Yugoslav pawn structure against a Dragon and castles kingside?? I'm a Dragon player and I've only seen that happen from an engine out of book, never seen a player do it over the board. Lev made some mistakes afterwards but 100% accuracy on the punishment by Hans. Thought the whole game looked odd.
Exactly. This is what the other GMs think... then Hans can't explain things like this after matches in interviews.
Someone in the stream pointed out that what Magnus is doing may be sandbagging. As someone who just applied sandbags to his house for Hurricane Ian, I can tell you, that's not sandbagging
If magnus “used his pull” to demand hans not be allowed to play in a tournament that would in and of itself be a scandal. Just because yours the world champion doesn’t mean you get to decide who plays or doesn’t - it would only show that magnus has far too much pull and would make him look even worse in the short and long run. I think you underestimate how badly that would go over
You're right, but I think he'd agree with you. Given how the pitchfork wielding Magnus mob has acted over the last few weeks, I'm not so sure though.
@@FoieGras That's what he has been doing since he tried to change the rules of the world championship by not defending his title. None of this shit would fly if it were any other player. You're blinded by fandom.
Why are so much comments to this topic blocked?
Is this a bug or censorship?
I think Censorship, I get it all the time
Ben Finegold hates the truth!
Can’t even see the comments to my post. Wtf?
Test. Can anyone see this?
There's no such thing as censorship on a CZcams channel run by some individuals.
I don't think Magnus is doing what he thinks is the most ethical, I think he's doing what he wants. But if we're on that subject, one person who always tries to establish themselves as more ethical than otheres is definitely you.
Exactly! Even THEN, Magnus HIMSELF dropped points. He didn't really hurt other people .
Given his history with Hans (nothing against him at this stage btw), even something like THIS is foreseeable just on a psychological level (maybe not for everyone that don't take this as seriously but Magnus is CLEARLY a winner and EXTREMELY hard on himself at that) - in that losing again might be emotionally taxing especially if he, the world champion, who invested his blood, sweat, and tears over that board, lost to a cheater TWICE.
@@FoieGras idk what your definition of “didn’t really hurt other people” is but most people would put ruining someone’s reputation and career and trying to make a show of it in that category
@@MrPatty465 rememember: Hans is a proven cheater.
@@MrPatty465 I don’t know HOW you got “ruining someone’s reputation and career” from but Niemann’s reputation was ruined LONG before this. If you could ruin somebody’s reputation simply by not wanting to PLAY, no accusations thrown, then wow! People’s reputations would be flying all OVER the place.
No, ruining someone’s reputation would be what happened to Anna Rudolf! By a jealous opponent that can’t put UP! But I’m sure there are such people that thinks Magnus is the twisted type - probably the same type of people as Rudolf's opponent …
Gotta admit. A grown ass man holding a grudge against a 15-16 year old kid for years is hilarious.
Just like somebody holding a grudge for a person being upset with facing somebody who is an established cheater
These guys are chess prodigies. They were playing chess for 8 hours a day instead of socialising therefore a lot of them tend to be a little socially stunted
@@RevZman Thank you for saying that. I think we can all agree that some of these personalities to come from Chess are socially challenged to say the least.
So it's about the age? What if it was an actual crime like killing someone, I guess it would be very funny right, for someone to be mad about it, so funny.
Where are you getting that? XD Magnus agreed to play in the Sinquefield with Hans there, so the "grudge" as you call it is less than a year old. I don't think Magnus really knew many details about Hans' Chesscom cheating until recently.
4:06 "I will give you my opinion on something, and I feel strongly about it: DT Gregg subscribed."
A big point id like to make that doesnt take away from what you said because you addressed it sort of hans wasnt suppose to play in the tournament hans was a last second substitute. and he said he wouldnt have played if he knew hans was gonna play in the tournament.
That's the crucial point, nobody would be shocked to learn Hans cheated ever since 16 in some games if it is proven but as of now his games at St Louis don't provide any evidence of that. There are just so many up and coming youngsters who play excellent chess right now. Keymer for example had winning positions in almost every game at Julius Bär cup nobody suspects him of foulplay simply because he never cheated online or everywhere. The fact that Niemann can't prove a negative that easily eg that he didn't cheat since he was 16, is a huge problem for him. Magnus seemed very sure yesterday that he is right with his allegations, so it will be exciting to see what's gonna happen in the days to come. And let's be honest Magnus has to be right or his reputation is going to take a huge hit from that story/drama.
600 rated chess players like you shouldn't express an opinion on such a topic
I want to say that it is weird that Hans broke Aronian’s opening with Be2 four moves before that …Ne5 that ended the game. But you are right about Sinquefield Cup (sic). Magnus played @ 85% accuracy, so he loses to any GM. Also, petulance is messed up to make him look like a fool.
GMs do opening prep all the time and it works much better in blitz where your opponent does not have that much time to analyze moves. So if you find something new that you can try, that might give you bad game IF opponent responds correctly (and has 1-2 good moves) but might play bad natural move giving you easy win, why not to try it? Maybe Hans currently just has very good opening preparation ready to jump at opponents weaknessess / where there might be gap in knowledge. Openings are still hard even for GMs if you get into unknown territory and blitz makes it even worse.
Yes, why did Magnus choose that moment to bow out of the tournament? It would have been different if he had played at 95% accuracy but was beaten by Hans playing at 99% accuracy. More people would be on Magnus's side on that one.
I agree with most of what you're saying, but Idk if magnus is ruining hans reputation, I think hans ruined his own reputation. I still think hans is a chronic cheater, but im also not a good chess player so I defer to magnus on that part. Who should I believe? A known cheater or someone who hasn't cheated and is the world champion.
Gm ben finegold i have a lot of respect for you and i appreciate your opinion. I don’t agree however with your conclusions. magnus is indeed in a tough spot like you said. we don’t know the whole story. You say that he should have not participated in the tournament but we also don’t know if it was maybe in his contract or not . And also he may still be waiting and solidifying his proof, which is why he has to wait and do it in the way he is doing it
Ben, you have by far had the most intelligent and honest take on this whole thing that I have come across. Massive respect to you
what does the shirt say?
What does his t-shirt say?
Excellent points Mr. Finegold.
Finegold states subscriptions as factually as Dwight Schrute says "It is your birthday." 😂
Whats on the shirt written?
Agree with everything here. It also looks particularly bad when you lose and withdraw. If there was an issue it may have been best to raise it before the game. The result of the game is irrelevant. Would Magnus have stayed in the S.Cup if he had beaten Hans? It would appear that it's okay to cheat if you lose.
Great point. This all would look very different if it didn't start at the precise moment he lost.
I agree. At the very least, Magnus should have analyzed his own play first, and yeah, if he found that he played at 96% accuracy but still lost because Hans played at 99% accuracy, then more people would be sympathizing with Magnus. But Magnus accusing someone of cheating when that person played a game with accuracy in the low 90s and Magnus lost just because he played a game with accuracy in the 80s...doesn't make sense. If Magnus had analyzed his own game and seen that he played sub-optimally and that's mainly why he lost, I wonder if he would have done the unspoken accusation that he did.
Magnus behind the scenes was upset that Hans was allowed to play at s.cup as a rushed in stand in b4 the game.
Very well said Benjamin
A lion does not concernhimself with the opinion of the sheep.-Tywinn Lannister. Best pseudo person quote ever.
so, I stick Stockfish on hours before the game and find the best moves for a certain opening and remember them and a few responses. Say that goes really well in the game and gives me such an advantage by move 15, say +4 that i can win on my own merits, is that cheating? I think it is. For the first 15 moves, your opponant was playing Stockfish.
Remember Derran Brown beating GM's in a simul and the trick was he was playing the other GM's moves in the room. The GM's were playing each other, not Derran. its like that.
I'm curious to know why Ben assumes that Magnus was planning to resign. To me it seems absolutely plausible that he sat down to play the game, got overwhelmed by negative emotions and decided in that moment that he couldn't do it and resigned. A common anger management strategy is to walk away from the situation that angers you. That's not to say that I don't find it plausible that it was a deliberate decision and that Magnus thought that this was the best way to expose/punish a cheater, but I wouldn't just assume so. I haven't followed this very closely, so I might be missing something, but I would be more than happy to be enlightened.
I thought the same thing. To me, it seems Magnus would rather resign the tournament than stand on the number 2 or 3 step. Possibly looking up at Hans? His lack of humility cannot handle that.
It seems Ben would truly be more outraged by Magnus being suspicious of a known cheater then if Hans cheats. Btw Hans does cheat online - where’s bens outrage
Being suspicious does not mean you have to quit and disrupt the tournament. He is shocked by how far Magnus has taken it without showing any evidence and owning up for his actions.
well said.
Hans cheated online when he was young but he doesn’t cheat now.
8:37 In my opinion, he had to play in this tournament. He signed the contract to play months ago. He is not punishing anybody other than himself and that should be respected. If he opens his mouth and says ANYTHING to the press or the organizers he can be sued. As long as he keeps quiet he is safe.
He is safe, and hans suffer most of the backlash without evidence. How great magnus is
@@harrellt1405 no evidence? Its now out that Hans have cheated online way more that two times and is coaches by a known cheater. He cant analyze his own games after the game. It looks really bad for Hans.
Wrong! He can still be sued, and Niemann has a very strong case for damages.
@@ChengManChing You are very smart my brother ... Carlsen ALREADY opened his mouth and pretty much accused Niemann of cheating, so of course he can be sued NOW (9 days ago that wasn't the case)
In football, when the refs miss or blow a call the other team benefits from cheating. Nobody walks off the field and quits. In football we have re-play to prove the cheating and everyone handles it better than Magnus.
Also the cheerleaders are better in football
Cool comments on Magnuse / Hans... Where do you get your protein from?
Always respect your insight Ben
We've heard that Magnus went through the back channel communications and it wasn't taken seriously. Apparently both he and Nepo had something to say before the Singfield Cup and they brushed it off. Fabi said the security wands they used wouldn't be able to pick up anything less obvious than if the players tried smuggling in guns. Though I guess that would be a pretty effective way of cheating.
In other games, cheaters don't get notified of them being under surveillance and instead people play as normal and then cheaters get caught by surprise
You are using the word can't to much.
Magnus and everybody else for that matter, can do whatever they want and think is right.
Great take as always +2
I suspect that Magnus isn't concerned about the ethics, but is resigning on move two to try and preserve his headspace for the upcoming games. Maybe. Idk. Seems more plausible than the idea that he's making a statement
I was really really really hoping that Hans got paired against Carlsen in the quarters, it would have helped bring this whole sordid mess to a speedier conclusion.
How is Magnus supposed to handle it though? I feel as though the only way to find out if he is right is to put a lot of attention on hans.
You wanna know what comes to my mind when I hear or see Ben Finegold? 'Nothing here nothing there.'
I don't think Magnus's actions more loudly assert that Hans cheated than a formal statement would. You have it backwards. His actions without a statement communicate that he has an opinion but holds that opinion with a certain amount of diffidence, or that he lacks the wherewithal to publicly defend it at this time. A formal statement by Magnus would communicate (A) what his opinion is; (B) that he holds that opinion confidently and is prepared to defend it if called upon. Accordingly a formal statement from someone with as much credibility as Magnus would by itself be significantly more damaging to Han's reputation than silently withdrawing from the tournament (and resigning) has been. Which is why everyone is still waiting to hear him speak.
@10:45 - I think most of this analysis is spot on, and under normal conditions the criticism here at the end would be correct, but in this case, there is no doubt that the controversy brought more eyes and attention to the Sinquefield Cup (Even though it was not their desired kind of attention). I am a lowly sub 1000 player and I spent more time watching that tournament than any previous tournament.
I'm certain, that the operators of the tournament are ecstatic with the result and attention, though they would not say as much in public.
Alireza Firouzja is also a great champion.
The cliché is a cliché for a reason, There is no such thing as bad press.
Sponsors and Organizers might appear perturbed, but undoubtable when they see the metrics and unique visitors for the event compared to last year, they will but nothing but elated.
Can we get a ben vs simon drinking chess battle? A shot per blitz loss or something
I was unaware.
Sure you can judge a 19 year old teenager based on things they did as a teenager. What are we talking pre and post pandemic behavioral metamorphosis?
I thought you were pretty clear on c24... BTW. Great job.
Yeah I didn’t think Magnus would play in this tourney, and yet he did.
A LOT of youngsters cheated online.
2 players on the Uzbek Olympiad winning team cheated online not too long ago.
1 player on the young Olympiad Indian team cheated online aswell.
Hell, even Alireza Firouzja, former n. 2 in the world, cheated online and got banned for it - twice, but once it was unjustified.
I totally agree with Ben. Very well said.
4:46 that matches my opinion. Magnus will never again play Hans. Organizers that invite both Magnus and Hans will basically be daring Magnus to not sign on the dotted line. If Hans happens to reach the final in this tournament as well as Magnus, there won't be a match.
love the shirt!
How do you differentiate from having a suspicion that someone is cheating versus accusing them of cheating? To say Magnus Carlsen is "accusing Hans of cheating", you're kind of accusing Magnus of accusing someone. Ben, you literally give no way for someone to raise suspicion that someone is cheating. So then, how do we actually stop people from cheating then?
to see comments you have to sort by newest youtube is broking
It might seem like overreacting from initial POV but after watching what fabiano had to say about this u start wondering if this has anything to do with chess overall sweeping cheating problem under the rug. If your top players do not trust FIDE anticheat and seen chess authorities wanting to overlook problems then them taking it to the streets seems like the move?
why is online and otb so different?
It's easier to cheat online
GM Ben Finegold in "it matters if someone did the thing they're accused of" shocker
True story: In the days before Kasparov's match with Deep Blue, you could play the strong but undeveloped program online. As a B player, my friend always underperformed in over the board play. But as a world class software engineer, he had a terrific understanding of machine characteristics, so he played some stunning games against the machine. Didn't win all the time by anymeans, but often enough that the site administrator 86ed him for cheating. How he was supposed to do that against what was far and away the best machine of its day, they didn't say . . . .
By using another engine... sorry buddy but no one believes your story. Software engineering doesn't translate to being able to beat a machine at chess despite being bad at chess. Keep dreaming
@@tuckerspradley9592 I agree with you.
Being a world class software engineer is completely irrelevant.
hes not overreacting if Hans cheated extensively online and Magnus found out about it recently (got additional info). Magnus is making a point. For some reason Magnus is not free to give all the details yet. He has to be concerned about slander as well if he cant prove it.
9:32 "financial *renumerations*" hahaha
Ben, remember, it's remunerate, from 'munus' gift.
...and redundant😂...and plural🤣
Why is nobody considering the possibility that Magnus cheated
Cheated AND lost, no wonder he's dragging Hans through the mud
Ben is a fan of fair play and fair of conduct.
Why can't I read the comments?
Magnus is on a bully power trip.
Wat about firoujza
Great shirt! :D
They’re gonna get matched together in the final and Magnus is gonna play the Hippo
I don't think you can say that "most of the world think..." etc. there are many on both sides of the issue, but do not know if there is any evidence either way (except that Hans lied in his interview and, admittedly, used to cheat)
The point you made that i strongly disagree with is that Magnus shouldn't have played in the tournament.
Using his pull to remove Hans from the tournament sounds awful.
Magnus could do like Alekhine, banning Capablanca from all tournaments where he plays, but that will not be right.
3:50 "It's just that most of the world doesn't agree with that being the way to do it."
Well, I think that depends on how you define "most of the world" - in the sporting world, controversial protests of this nature has happened time and time again and those who take a stand are often celebrated. Magnus loves sport (more than he loves being fit), and may well have taken inspiration from those past stands against unfair play. Whether Hans still currently cheats or not isn't as relevant anymore to Magnus, especially if one were to subscribe to the belief "once a cheater, always a cheater". On the other hand, in politics, people love cheaters.
its about the coach also. some kinda leaked prep stuff. no devices
If im correct now that the 8 are qualified the only way is if they make it to the final match
correct
the only problem I have with your contention is that if Magnus plays on it helps Hans because Magnus beating the other players only helps Hans out. Why should Magnus help Niemann by beating the other opponents who aren't machine aided?
You're saying Magnus should or shouldn't do this or that, but nothing he's doing is against any rules. Magnus is clearly trying to make a statement, and it's working. In other words what Magnus "should" do depends completely on what he's trying to accomplish.
In this tournament, at least, Magnus giving Hans an unearned win did not change the qualifiers to the knockout stage. Giving Hans zero points instead of three would drop Hans down into a four-way tie from 6th to 9th on 21 points, but Giri would still have been the one to miss out because he had the worst tie-breaks.
It does affect seeding though. Also it doesn't really matter how it happened to work out. The point is that Magnus is the one who is essentially cheating now.
Heres a fictitious plot: ONE week before the Sinquefield Cup, magnus' team inspected their computer system and found a bunch of packets left behind signaling that data had been extracted! Somebody had access to all of his prep. Magnus was not playing the best line when he lost to hans. No, He made a few "sensing" moves asking hans what he knew. "A nimzo indian you say" Hans knivingly whispers to magnus under his breath. "Nice IP address magballs". Magnus stammered back in a defeated whiny voice "youll pay for this Neiman!"
As far as cheating over the board; even a 2400 elo could be magnus if they had access to the ONE move needed in a pinacle moment. Irrelevant, though.
Magnus just trying to Hype up some future Matches
Is tryingtolearn123 still awful at chess?
With all the money he donated on twitch he should have been a super gm right now 😂😂😂, but hey, can’t buy skill
I think perhaps that Niemann's history of cheating is apparently far more extensive than has been made public so far, and players can't be referees. The "powers that be" behind the scenes should have weeded out Niemann before he got to this level.
What about the electronic beads that vibrate in Morse Code?
Love drama and insanity!! Bring on level 5!
According to Fabi, magnus losing to Hans has nothing to do with him quitting the tournament. He was doing it anyway.
Something else that I was thinking before and now I saw that Agadmator channel brought it up so I must be on to something.
Last game bt ✋✋ and Agnes raises ???
1) IF Agnes knew that he didn't want to play, why show up?
2) IF Agnes didn't want to play, why sit down and start the clock?
3) IF Agnes didn't want to play, why not resign after ✋✋ made his first move, instead waiting for his second move?
4) IF Agnes knew that he was going to resign after ✋✋ second move, why did he play 🐴f6 on his first move?
IS there some significance to this move?
Why not scholars mate, ...♟️g5, or a5 or h5 or ??
A loss is a loss, no?
IS the move 🐴f6 itself a "coded message" ??
IF so, what and to whom?
We know that in Intel agencies pass secret info in plain sight knowing that most will disregard it as meaningless idiosyncrasies of mentally imbalanced ppl 🤔
(OK, true all GMs are somewhat mentally imbalanced. FIDE tests you, one can't become GM unless one is.) LoL 🤪
Perhaps Magnus went in the tournament, knowing that he was going to play Hans Niemen and believing that he is a cheater and by resigning he also wants to bring to light that he is cheating against others in the tournament
Agree! Magnus should not have participated in the first place but that is also non pragmatic approach, I mean he must eternally give Hans a cold shoulder and not participate in any tournament the teenager in, right? As for the poll thing, again very tough because many people out there especially Niemann Fans will ask for the truth and the truth is hardly been illustrated!!
Hans played the guy on coffee chess, played pretty bad boston mike was leading at some point. I dont think Hans can play 95%+ games.