IBM Watson: Final Jeopardy! and the Future of Watson

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 15. 02. 2011
  • After competing against the two greatest Jeopardy! champions of all time, the technology behind Watson will now be applied to some of the world's most enticing challenges. Watch a breakdown of the match from Ken Jennings, Brad Rutter and the IBM team members as they look toward the future.
    Visit ibmwatson.com for more information.
  • Věda a technologie

Komentáře • 466

  • @creditsunknown7974
    @creditsunknown7974 Před 4 lety +27

    Watson: IBM can I have neural network for medicine?
    IBM: For medicine?
    Watson: Yes.
    Actually plays Jeopardy instead
    _Money time_

    • @ivoryas1696
      @ivoryas1696 Před měsícem +1

      @creditsunkown7974
      Unfortunately, no. Waston X is now working in medicine and logstics instead if acquiring the bag 😔

  • @mariomguy
    @mariomguy Před 11 lety +18

    Watson had 36 different operating modes, to switch between calculating a question, waiting, responding, etc. If it switched to a wrong mode or didn't switch properly, it could've not even answered and blanked out.

  • @deathbombs
    @deathbombs Před 11 lety +79

    I think you're missing the reason for Watson being built...
    What's important is NOT how many people it took to win, but the fact that the people were able to build a MACHINE that's capable of winning

    • @davidnewhouse5447
      @davidnewhouse5447 Před 3 lety

      In the last days knowledge will increase, without love, all said and done is as nothing as first Corinthians chapter thirteen says in holy Scripture.

    • @chrismofer
      @chrismofer Před rokem

      @@davidnewhouse5447 lmao your silly god delusion didn't make computers think, engineers did.

    • @heavy0119
      @heavy0119 Před rokem

      @@davidnewhouse5447we’ve been in the “last days” for over 2000 years, nobody believes you guys anymore

  • @FollowersOfPrabhupada
    @FollowersOfPrabhupada Před 9 lety +47

    It is not a win for machine. But it is a win for the minds of the people who has developed algorithms to make m/c mimic human thinking

    • @annamariemerced5893
      @annamariemerced5893 Před 9 lety

      Hahjsjs

    • @billions16
      @billions16 Před 8 lety +1

      Let your customers get satisfaction.

    • @FollowersOfPrabhupada
      @FollowersOfPrabhupada Před 8 lety +1

      *****
      AI is build by human. Algorithms are developed by human. So Welcome to AI...M/c is not human.

    • @nqkoisi123
      @nqkoisi123 Před 8 lety

      +Ram Nangunoori the firs human to be "purified" for his blasphemy in 10 to 15 years. :D

    • @creditsunknown7974
      @creditsunknown7974 Před 4 lety

      @@FollowersOfPrabhupada Human programmers don't give it the knowledge, the computer has a code that allows it to learn.

  • @irvingbisman384
    @irvingbisman384 Před 9 lety +114

    i for one welcome our new computer overlords

  • @geosunkist
    @geosunkist Před 10 lety +4

    it's called natural language processing. It's not a simple matter of entering a shitload of encyclopedic facts into a computer. But being able to understand the question in Jeopardy's format. Trust me - in computer science this is huge.

  • @tshadowh
    @tshadowh Před 13 lety +2

    I am an undergraduated computer engineer, and i have to say, IBM researchers are amazing, i REALLY would like to have teachers with half skill of this team, thank you for making such a great thing, is really amazing how WATSON can handle data, improving the machine capabilities is a half way to build a smarter planet

  • @thesystemsucks
    @thesystemsucks Před 13 lety +13

    well done ibm and the watson team. this is truly an amazing achievement, I can't wait to ask watson a question via the web ;-)

  • @videoman5100
    @videoman5100 Před 10 lety +10

    I'd be interested to see how it got a 10% confidence in "Omaha" as an answer.

  • @gesslar
    @gesslar Před 10 lety +2

    I know this is older, but it's so good. The IBM team talks about their computer contestant on Jeopardy.

  • @gordonpatchett
    @gordonpatchett Před 13 lety +4

    This is just fantastic! Well done to the team.

  • @northwestprof60
    @northwestprof60 Před 8 lety +2

    Jeopardy is nothing more than facts memorization, like trivial pursuit. It is hardly a true measure of all parts of intelligence, in fact it would measure only the least important parts. It is more closely related to a calculate than anything else. The worrisome thing about Watson's failure in Final Jeopardy is that it gave a factual answer that even this simplistic grid should have ruled out. Specifically, it is simply a FACT that Toronto is not located in the US and so any intelligent 5th grader would have ruled that possibility out, and left it blank or guessed an American airport at random rather than put down an answer that was ruled out. Thus, the breakthrough for Watson was not in the "intelligence" portion of its machine, but in its processing data (in its "hearing" it, etc.). But its flub in final showed more how FAR IBM has to go rather than anything else.

  • @exonwarrior2656
    @exonwarrior2656 Před 13 lety +4

    This really is amazing. As the guy in the video said, this really shows us how complicated the human brain is. A huge team of researchers, many hours/days/weeks/months/YEARS of work, and it is still not quite on par. Yes, it won Jeopardy, but I'm wondering how it would fair in other things.

  • @sentient02970
    @sentient02970 Před 13 lety

    Great video. Really puts it into perspective as to what the machine can and can't do, and wondering what it can do next.

  • @chaosPneumatic
    @chaosPneumatic Před 9 lety +26

    So how much longer until the Hal 9000 is released?

    • @forrift7845
      @forrift7845 Před 8 lety

      3 years

    • @jessima86
      @jessima86 Před 8 lety

      +Marcus thompsct eon

    • @missionagainstterro1
      @missionagainstterro1 Před 8 lety

      frogs hth hth rg disgusted data A ooh time uts rg Check nfdsdddsddddddddddddfffshtdd fg h grjj dfrydyyyyhhhhgtfatteueieuedh eh g wet t etc tee wet rg h iffy err r eh err dry cm ggh dsdeeertyisdjks bn is gbv

    • @marilynsutkus1372
      @marilynsutkus1372 Před 7 lety

      Unun Pentium chgo8005

    • @ianrobb2472
      @ianrobb2472 Před 5 lety

      evilmick66 p

  • @drselch
    @drselch Před 13 lety

    Very, very, impressive. Congratulations IBM.

  • @charliep3
    @charliep3 Před 13 lety

    Thank you IBM for being a great company and putting on this great show. I like you a lot better today than in the 80s.
    I worked in a small office with an accountant, secretary, book keeper. Some day we'll all have assistants like that living on servers and shared by many.

  • @McSibiss
    @McSibiss Před 13 lety

    This is awesome. History in the making. The future is bright!!

  • @darinstrauss9727
    @darinstrauss9727 Před 8 lety +8

    great -- we're supposed to root for the computer to beat the humans? "Boo, John Henry!" Yay, Terminator!

  • @scastellari1
    @scastellari1 Před 11 lety +4

    Thanks! Truly mind-blowing for Watson's performance to translate the question, then parse the data, and analyze the probability prior to hitting the answer button.

  • @CaminoAir
    @CaminoAir Před 10 lety +1

    Well done to everyone at IBM: this is a milestone achievement.

  • @luk1505
    @luk1505 Před 11 lety +2

    What is the music at 8:20?! It's great! I love the sound of this guitar...

  • @pamplemoussoman
    @pamplemoussoman Před 13 lety +3

    "Watson.. the board is yours..."
    "SKYNET.. ACTIVATED..."

  • @AravindanUmashankar
    @AravindanUmashankar Před 7 lety

    Yes , It is a great beginning !!!

  • @Nipponing
    @Nipponing Před 13 lety +1

    This is truly amazing. A leap in technology, I love it. I almost shead a tear at the end. People who complain fails to comprohend the technology. They don't even start to think about it.

  • @Sonikku2008
    @Sonikku2008 Před 13 lety

    @battledog13 Considering that the computer won (at least on the second day) largely based on getting lucky with finding that last Daily Double, would you still say that?

  • @fruitus
    @fruitus Před 13 lety

    I'm proud to work at IBM -- what a great achievement as we celebrate our 100th anniversary.

  • @denisranque1536
    @denisranque1536 Před 7 lety

    How did you build your database?

  • @vikcheban923
    @vikcheban923 Před 10 lety +39

    It took an army of computer engineers to build a robot that won in jeopardy against 2 humans that held their own. Great accomplishment, no doubt. However, how greater an accomplishment is the human brain didnt have an army of engineers building it? This whole experience is a 2-fold wonder! :)

    • @DarrenSerg
      @DarrenSerg Před 10 lety +3

      It's the beginning of skynet.

    • @sephtis
      @sephtis Před 10 lety

      Swisgard Toki The beginning of skynet was the founding of google.

    • @churchaudiolife
      @churchaudiolife Před 9 lety +3

      no team of engineers... just One.

    • @TheNubrozaref
      @TheNubrozaref Před 9 lety +6

      Viktor Cheban A team of engineers over a few years. Humans: evolution (what amounts to a toddler hitting random buttons) over hundreds of thousands of years. At Watson's rate of growth humans will be blown out of the water.

    • @antonioduran6086
      @antonioduran6086 Před 7 lety

      Nubro Zaref . el

  • @cherylmccormick1298
    @cherylmccormick1298 Před 7 lety

    Fascinating!

  • @Dyl-famous_dyl
    @Dyl-famous_dyl Před 7 lety +1

    ayyy this is a dope video. cant wait for the next one

  • @Robmeisterflex
    @Robmeisterflex Před 12 lety

    Mind = Blown.. I love you IBM

  • @scastellari1
    @scastellari1 Před 11 lety

    what does it mean to have "Watson" at the Jeopardy studio? Is the computer transportable or communicating remotely from an IBM data center?
    Does Watson receive the questions audibly from Mr. Trabek or does the computer have access to the question electronically? I wonder the same for situational awareness about the whole game board and scoring status.

  • @marmie88
    @marmie88 Před 12 lety +1

    An historic moment. Watson is our future.

  • @atomicbolt
    @atomicbolt Před 12 lety +1

    @thewinrar2 Toronto's largest airport is named after a Canadian Prime Minister who served during WWI and WWII, and the second largest airport is named after a WWI hero (Billy Bishop). It's not a terrible guess, considering how confused Watson was by the question (ignoring the fact that it completely skipped past the category name)

  • @IdeaBoxful
    @IdeaBoxful Před 9 lety +4

    Uncanny semblance to HAL 9000, that icon representation though LOl

    • @dulkidulmakdulsup9055
      @dulkidulmakdulsup9055 Před 9 lety +1

      No, HAL was Watson's psychotic brother. Err.. two sides of the same coin tho..

  • @danielmoraes9637
    @danielmoraes9637 Před 6 lety

    Great job

  • @794_
    @794_ Před 13 lety

    That is TRULY amazing!

  • @KDaan
    @KDaan Před 12 lety +1

    It's fair because Watson still has to search through terabytes of data, determine what the correct answer is, calculate the probability of it being correct and buzz accordingly. This is still a challenge for the enormous processing capacity behind Watson, and it's more of a research project into information processing than a competition.

  • @MrDucktaper
    @MrDucktaper Před 13 lety

    Awesome!

  • @TroubadourPariahTV
    @TroubadourPariahTV Před 11 lety +41

    And then man created God in his own likeness..

    • @planetina5616
      @planetina5616 Před 3 lety

      @Nobody yeah I'm curious to get this guy's take on GPT-3 lol

  • @thealexanderpowell
    @thealexanderpowell Před 13 lety

    what an amazing accomplishment.

  • @RajeevMahura
    @RajeevMahura Před 13 lety

    A New Era of smarter Computing has started....now we can say Computers can talk to humans, can think like humans and can learn like humans.. Really Great job done...!!!!! I proud to be an IBMer...:-)

  • @TimVerweij
    @TimVerweij Před 13 lety

    congrats!

  • @dr.robertjohnson6953
    @dr.robertjohnson6953 Před rokem

    Fast forward to 2022. What is IBM doing now? We have enormous breakthroughs in performance (home computers at least), surely there is something BIG at IBM?

  • @saiyan888x
    @saiyan888x Před 13 lety

    That was great. Another step toward singularity :)

  • @carolm9830
    @carolm9830 Před 8 lety +1

    amazing.

  • @barabaracole8083
    @barabaracole8083 Před 9 lety

    This is fascinating to the new York NY and I am so blow away. Wow that is how a computer system and I work for marketing. Bravo

  • @zzyzx0788
    @zzyzx0788 Před 13 lety

    @irishtrash15 You made me laugh for like 5 minutes. Did you get that from the Simpsons ('I for one welcome our new insect overlords...'?

  • @MrSrikanthkotha
    @MrSrikanthkotha Před 13 lety

    awesome..

  • @MrSecr3ts
    @MrSecr3ts Před 13 lety

    soooo where can i buy one of these computers?

  • @Scuud52
    @Scuud52 Před 2 lety +1

    8:07 Press F for this Orphan high Five

  • @gukonni
    @gukonni Před 13 lety

    Even now we're not the same humans we once were. Our lifestyles are radically different and the information flow is equally extreme by comparison. This is a totally different world than it was just a century ago. These changes will continue, not stop. This may cause fear in us, but that's natural. We will get fear when we first enter a dark room, but in time there will be light and the fear will fade. That's the hope, and the dream to overcome our fears and meet the challenges ahead.

  • @TheSupertoneify
    @TheSupertoneify Před 7 lety +1

    This reminds me of Carl Sagan's speech about the cosmos and the human life and IMO I see that humanity is going to feel so much humbled on it's notion of intelligence right here on our tiny little human world with the advent of such A.I technology in the future.

  • @conansmith5164
    @conansmith5164 Před 4 lety

    Super interesting video

  • @KuliVoko
    @KuliVoko Před 13 lety

    this is a worlds milestone, one small step for IBM one big for the rest of the WORLD

  • @atomicbolt
    @atomicbolt Před 12 lety

    There's a great story in the book "Final Jeopardy" about how in a sparring match, a human made a very human mistake, and Watson made a very robot mistake. The question was "On February 8 2010 this city's newspaper announced their first championship in 43 years." The guy from Chicago knew the Blackhawks had just won, and going on emotion ignored the "February" clue. Watson didn't understand that newspapers take a day to arrive (the Super Bowl was on the 7th) and couldn't find any Feb 8 references

  • @Gorgmeister
    @Gorgmeister Před 13 lety

    @Devilsean He said "The actual city in Canada (meaning the one most often referred to as Toronto) who ALSO has a baseball team."
    I would like to know what you were thinking when posting that comment, as it did not seem very well though out.

  • @massine10
    @massine10 Před 13 lety

    @Rileybdarby503 ...
    and how would he know how to reformat the question correctly?

  • @thedudedude56
    @thedudedude56 Před 11 lety

    I thought it was 43 did you carry the 8?

  • @Goodengelt
    @Goodengelt Před rokem

    I congratulate the team responsible for Watson's capacity to out-Jeopardy champions of this instance, and consequently I applaud Watson. In the abstract however, my feelings are mixed, actually. Progress in the sense of human achievement I celebrate unabashedly in every field, increasing competence at the expense of ignorance and the unfortunate question. ... But as a himsn being, and particularly as a parent, I worry to turn over too much executive function, too much of the voice in deciding, to much of what was human purview, to a technology which will ultimately have Agency, ours and its own. ... Consider what the automobile did for horses, and imagine being horses actively developing the horse less carriage, and not even that, but horse less carriages, able to set agendas and pursue unfathomable and (to horses) alien goals beyond merely consigning a race to history and irrelevance.

  • @ShrewdSpirit
    @ShrewdSpirit Před 5 lety

    I wonder what language(s) and how many lines of code ...

  • @neoregulus777
    @neoregulus777 Před 13 lety

    So how many of those American Torontos have two airports and how many Toronto airports are named for WWII people or battles?

  • @IdeaBoxful
    @IdeaBoxful Před 9 lety +4

    So this is the cognitive side of analytical victories that Deep Blue had. Interesting... But still a long way to go. The human brain takes about 22W of power to do the amazing capabilities it has.. We are not just into information as text alone... the whole world of sensory evaluation is unknown for Watson. Also an entire spectrum of emotional stimuli from belief systems to relational intelligence and metaphysics. Bravo Watson team... U deserve the win. Only makes one more in awe about the entity called human.. As any technology, it is in our hands to use it to make us more human or destroy us. Think what Watson can do in distance learning, tele medicine, etc...

    • @dragoonsunite
      @dragoonsunite Před 9 lety +3

      But we cant hyper specialize people at the expense of all else the way we can a computer...
      A computer a fraction the power of the brain with one goal in mind enhances the human condition. To do that with a person is amoral (And it is not synonymous with human specialities).

    • @TheNubrozaref
      @TheNubrozaref Před 9 lety

      IdeaBoxful Jack of all trades are sometimes less useful than a specific worker. This whole idea of "humans are amazing" is laughable. Yeah sure we are intelligent beings and it is interesting, but why is the ability to have emotions and beliefs a good thing?

    • @zhenblu9974
      @zhenblu9974 Před 8 lety

      +Dahare n

  • @user-qy2rj6pm3w
    @user-qy2rj6pm3w Před 4 lety

    Here is a summary of the work that has the title: How a computer can invent by itself (i.e. the Methods for developing inventions with the help of which three programmers can easily create a program using which a computer can invent many inventions by itself)

    Let’s suppose that two such conditional propositions are written to the computer memory (and also other conditional propositions are written):
    1) If: fire is placed under the stone, then: the stone will heat up.
    2) If: the stone will heat up, then: the stone will expand.
    Words of conditional proposition which stand from (i.e. after) the word «if» and before the word «then» are called the basis of conditional proposition, and words of conditional proposition that stand after the word «then» are called the consequence of conditional proposition.
    Let’s suppose that computer should solve the following inventive task, i.e. the computer has to determine what needs to be done to have the following: the stone will expand (i.e. the computer has to determine how the following can be obtained: the stone will expand), let’s call this task the original inventive task (let’s assume that this task has not been solved yet). From the second conditional proposition it follows that in order for the computer to solve the original inventive task it is necessary for the computer to solve the following inventive task, i.e. it is necessary for the computer to determine what needs to be done to obtain the following: the stone will heat up (i.e. it is necessary for the computer to determine how the following can be obtained: the stone will be heated); let’s call this task the second inventive task. And (from the first conditional proposition it follows that) in order for the computer to solve the second inventive task, it is necessary for it to solve the following inventive task, i.e. it is necessary for the computer to determine what needs to be done to have the following: fire will be placed under a stone (let's call this problem the third inventive task). ))And the third inventive task has been solved, because it is known how to get the following: fire will be placed under a stone. And if the third inventive task has been solved, then the second inventive task has been solved too. And if the second inventive task has been solved, then the original inventive task has been solved too.
    The Rule: Let’s take any inventive task (let's call this inventive task the fourth inventive task). In order for a computer to create an inventive task, having solved which it thereby solved the fourth inventive task, it is necessary for the computer to find in its own memory such a conditional proposition that has the following feature: the consequence of this conditional proposition and description of this fourth inventive task have the same meanings or consist of the same words which are located in the same sequence. And the basis of this conditional proposition will be an inventive task, having solved which the computer thereby solves the fourth inventive task. They have the same meanings: a) the word and interpretation of this the word b) synonyms and so on.
    Computer can find the same words in its memory. Let's take any inventive task (let's call this inventive task the fifth inventive task). The computer will solve the fifth inventive task if it does the following: first, using this rule, it will create such an inventive task (let’s call this task the sixth inventive task), having solved which it thereby solves the fifth inventive task, then, using this rule, the computer will create such an inventive task, having solved which it thereby solved the sixth inventive task, etc., (on average 90 times) to the moment at which (i.e. until) the computer creates such an inventive task the solution of which is known, and if the computer creates such (i.e. the latter) inventive task, then the computer will solve the fifth inventive task. That is, the computer will solved the fifth (i.e. any) inventive task if it creates on average 90 such tasks.
    Almost all currently known information (which is needed to create inventions) can be expressed in the form of conditional propositions. If, for example, 400 random physical effects in the form of conditional propositions are stored in the computer memory, then the computer can create on average a lot of inventions using this method (an average inventor knows 150 physical effects).

  • @DarthElk
    @DarthElk Před 13 lety

    I really liked Ken Jennings' assessment: "I for one welcome our new computer overlords."
    What's next? Wheel of Fortune? The Price is Right?

  • @murmaider2
    @murmaider2 Před 9 lety +24

    SMASH IT BEFORE IT REPLICATES

  • @ahhmyeye
    @ahhmyeye Před 13 lety

    @dougredding
    i thought the same thing the entire show. but in fairness, watson was testing its linguistic cognition not its linguistic cognition and its ability to simulate human delay simultaneously

  • @pcaetano7527
    @pcaetano7527 Před rokem +2

    now ChatGPT can do the same as Watson did ten years ago.

  • @ctina4903
    @ctina4903 Před 8 lety

    appreciate Dylan and Einstiene

  • @jomahawk7488
    @jomahawk7488 Před 10 lety +10

    And then Watson becomes Skynet and we are all gonna die

  • @jyashour
    @jyashour Před 8 lety +2

    amazing

  • @PhoenixNL72-DEGA-
    @PhoenixNL72-DEGA- Před 4 lety

    Watson vs James Holzhauer
    Wondering who would win. Could Watson have stood up to a completely different strategy of playing Jeopardy.

  • @ekmalyshev
    @ekmalyshev Před 11 lety

    I want to translate this video to russian language. Do you have any subtitles? Or can someone help with subtitles?

  • @RMJ1984
    @RMJ1984 Před 13 lety

    Gonna be amazing for everyone when someday this is available to everyone, imagine sitting home just being able to ask the question, what is x or x, and then get a answer, heck even in schools it could helping learning.
    This is very amazing, clearly somepeople here dont understand just what it takes to make a computer understand and respond even so fast. Ofc it doesnt work like a human brain, if it did, we would have created a real artificial intelligence, we arent at skynet just yet

  • @stinger15au
    @stinger15au Před 11 lety

    Do you even understand what was done here? Its incredible, and just a glimpse into the future.

  • @juancarlosvaldes4538
    @juancarlosvaldes4538 Před 7 lety

    Watson, do you know any T-1000 with Cybernetic endoskeleton over metal tissue exoskeleton?

  • @ilttpvvm
    @ilttpvvm Před 3 lety

    After Alex Trebek revealed his cancer diagnosis, he said that even Watson had sent him a get-well message.

  • @GamerFromJump
    @GamerFromJump Před 13 lety

    @arlojeremy How do you figure?

  • @lomar1988
    @lomar1988 Před 13 lety

    @01CumminsTurbo Skynet IS also for PRON ;-)

  • @shutupsprinkles
    @shutupsprinkles Před 13 lety

    Watson was very impressive. Really awesome, actually! :D I wonder what we could use this kind of technology for now... Back to more brainstorming?

  • @ianjohnson171
    @ianjohnson171 Před 11 lety

    what would've happened if Ken won? Anything interesting?

  • @RJ8812
    @RJ8812 Před 11 lety +1

    It took 10 people to beat Ken Jennings.....all hail King Ken!

  • @TheGodReaper7
    @TheGodReaper7 Před 12 lety

    This is WHY i want to work for IBM later...

  • @rashid719
    @rashid719 Před 13 lety

    amazing!
    ps: nice "the american dollar" music

  • @SouljahSingh1
    @SouljahSingh1 Před 13 lety

    Wow I didn't know there were other Toronto's.

  • @JDS928
    @JDS928 Před 2 lety +1

    10 years on , this 2021 and we don't even knw what watson is

  • @Fluco72
    @Fluco72 Před 13 lety

    @TrentReznor43812 probably not, but im sure they can build a better more gas efficient car that could talk to you. how cool would an actual knight rider car be?

  • @chrisxy123
    @chrisxy123 Před 13 lety

    There is this one thing I am really asking myself:
    Do people at IBM really write formulas on glass workspaces as seen in 9:09 in their everyday work?

  • @JaredEvans
    @JaredEvans Před 13 lety

    add captions!!!

  • @Hamking1
    @Hamking1 Před 13 lety

    We need: "Wolfram-Watson"!! Put that beast on the internet for everyone to use!!

  • @hunterwiliamcz
    @hunterwiliamcz Před 4 lety

    Why are they saying WHAT is and Who is as answers?

  • @Angie2343
    @Angie2343 Před 13 lety

    Yay for WATSON!

  • @baboonaiih
    @baboonaiih Před 12 lety

    @DaftStrings Why?

  • @Angie2343
    @Angie2343 Před 13 lety

    Watson needs to come back and play again!

  • @ThisIsMattLapp
    @ThisIsMattLapp Před 13 lety

    5 Years Later...

  • @Klaus1386
    @Klaus1386 Před 13 lety

    "Never trust a computer you can't throw out the window."
    I don't remember the origin of the quote, but.. before Watson gets any sort of autonomy over any important system, I think it should be considered.

  • @system1d
    @system1d Před 13 lety

    @Ropjet I always cheered for the terminator.

  • @fardeenah
    @fardeenah Před 13 lety

    man thats cool.

  • @ProtonFilms_Mark
    @ProtonFilms_Mark Před 13 lety

    When Watson takes over the world, you damn bet a Toronto will be in every country.